Cations Catalogue Trade Law 2008

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cations Catalogue Trade Law 2008 Publications Catalogue trade law 2008 2008 areas publications catalobiodive 008 environmental ma iucn Rue Mauverney 28 1196 Gland marine Switzerland Tel +41 22 999 0000 t Fax +41 22 999 0002 [email protected] The World Conservation Union www.iucn.org logo World Headquarters IUCN PUBLICATIONS CATALOGUE IUCN PUBLICATIONS Since 1948, IUCN has published a wide array of books on conservation and sustainable development issues. It is recognized as the scientifi c authority behind many of the management guidelines, state-of-the-art assessments and conservation policies in use today. IUCN’s publications are one of the most important results of a unique global collaboration between members, Commissions, donors and partners. A PUBLICATIONS REPOSITORY To ensure that our unique scientifi c expertise is made widely available to those who need it, an online Publications Catalogue was designed in 2006. This searchable catalogue provides access to the more than 3,500 authoritative texts published by the World Conservation Union (IUCN) from 1948 to the present, plus a selection of titles from IUCN members, partners and other publishers. It holds over 600 free downloadable documents. WWW.IUCN.ORG/PUBLICATIONS This new edition of the Publications Catalogue features the most recent titles published worldwide. Some of them exist in hard copy and may be purchased, while others exist only in electronic format. Still others may be obtained directly through one of our regional or country offi ces. The online Publications Catalogue will allow you to search for less recent publications. Specifi c details on how to order hard copies may be found below. HOW TO ORDER Please use the order form in the back of this catalogue or order directly from our online catalogue at www. iucn.org/publications. Beginning in 2007 all book orders have been handled by SMI, our order fulfi llment partner in the UK, through their on-line book shop Earthprint. Orders are redirected to them automatically, and publications are sent to you as soon as possible. Most IUCN titles (English only) are distributed in North America by Island Press, publishers and distributors of an impressive range of environmental titles. IUCN publications are listed on their website (www.islandpress.com) and they are also supplied to Amazon.com. Orders may be processed on line or by sending orders to: Island Press, c/o University of Chicago Distribution Center, Dept. 3EMM, 11030 South Langley Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60628, USA; Tel: +1 800 621 2736; Fax +1 800 621 8476. IUCN titles are also featured on Google Book Search (http://books.google.com/), where they are searchable and linked directly to our website. CONTENTS 1 BIODIVERSITY 4 EDUCATION 6 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 12 FORESTS 14 LAW 20 MARINE 24 PROTECTED AREAS 30 BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINE SERIES 32 SPECIES 32 RED DATA LISTINGS 34 ACTION PLANS AND OCCASIONAL PAPERS 37 CONSERVATION 40 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 42 TRADE 43 WETLANDS AND WATER 48 IUCN NETHERLANDS COMMITTEE 50 COFFEE TABLE BOOKS 52 REGIONAL PUBLICATIONS 59 THE WORLD OF IUCN 61 IUCN OFFICES AROUND THE WORLD 63 ALPHABETICAL LISTING AND PRICES 77 ORDER FORM CONTENTS i BIODIVERSITY Biodiversity, the Next Challenge for Financial Institutions? A scoping study to assess exposure of financial institutions to biodiversity business risks and identifying options for business opportunities Mulder, Ivo While the business case for climate change is now widely recognized, the business case for biodiversity has only to a limited extent been addressed. “Biodiversity”, or the ecosystem services that support our way of life, are becoming the next challenge for financial institutions. This report focuses on the specific implications of exposure to biodiversity business risks for the commercial banking sector, asset managers and investors, and (re)insurance firms. It provides an overview of available tools and best management practices to enable financial institutions to mitigate any adverse impacts proactively. The report also identifies a number of biodiversity business opportunities for financial institutions that make both financial as well as conservation sense. A number of recommendations are presented to the financial sector, as well as to other stakeholders, such as NGOs, governments and multilateral institutions on how to further build and communicate the business case for biodiversity to the financial community. ISBN 978-2-8317-0994-9, 2007 xiii, 60p. Available in PDF format at: www.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/2007-010.pdf Mujeres indígenas, territorialidad y biodiversidad en el Contexto Latinoamericano Luz, Marina Donato; Escobar, Elsa Matilde; Escobar, Pía; Pazmiño, Aracely; Ulloa, Astrid Este texto reúne las ponencias del Segundo Seminario Internacional Mujeres indígenas, territorialidad y biodiversidad. Uno de los ejes para el desarrollo de estos seminarios ha sido partir del supuesto de que en todas las culturas, las mujeres y los hombres establecen relaciones muy distintas, no sólo con el resto de la sociedad, sino también con sus territorios y recursos, o con su biodiversidad. Se articula en torno a cinco ejes temáticos: participación política y ambiental, reconfiguraciones territoriales, conocimientos tradicionales y biodiversidad, alternativas desde lo local y, políticas globales y sus efectos locales. Estos temas se desarrollan a lo largo de 28 textos, desde la perspectiva indígena y no indígena, los cuales presentan las voces, demandas, situaciones y propuestas de las mujeres de 19 pueblos indígenas, habitantes de 11 países latinoamericanos. ISBN 958-8063-55-3, 2007 A disposición en la Oficina Regional para América del Sur. Disponible también en PDF: www.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/2007-009.pdf Good Practice Guidance for Mining and Biodiversity Starke, Linda, ed. This book was published as part of an extensive dialogue between the International Council for Mining and Metals and the World Conservation Union (IUCN), which was set up to explore different aspects of biodiversity conservation in the mining and metals sector. The guide provides an informative, accessible and highly practical reference source on biodiversity which can be used by mining companies at all stages of their operations, from Y T I initial exploration to mine closure planning and implementation. S R E ISBN 0-9549954-8-1, 2006 DIV 142p.: ill. O I Free of charge – you pay only shipping; Order no. IUCN 1500 B Also available in PDF format at: www.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/2006-026.pdf 1 Towards European Biodiversity Monitoring: Assessment, Monitoring and Reporting of Conservation Status of European Habitats and Species The latest IUCN Red List shows that a third of all amphibians, one in eight birds and a quarter of all mammals are under threat globally. Action is needed at the international level and the EU has taken a strategic approach across Europe, by implementing the Birds and Habitats Directives. The Directives are the most significant steps taken so far by the EU to meet its own target of “halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010”. Monitoring, assessing and reporting the success of this legislation is vital. The monitoring exercise presented in this report represents the valuable contribution that NGOs can make. The European Habitats Forum brings together NGOs working to implement the Directives, and represents a wide range of knowledge and expertise on many species and habitat groups as well as experience gained from involvement at the local level. This report will be of use to other European institutions, government ministries and agencies undertaking their own monitoring, assessment and reporting exercises. ISBN 3-901458-22-0, 2006 80p.: ill., maps Available in PDF format at: www.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/2006-029.pdf An Uncertain Future: Biodiversity and Livelihoods along the Mekong River in Northern Lao PDR Lazarus, Kate; Dubeau, Pierre; Bambaradeniya, Channa The Lao People’s Democratic Republic lies at the heart of the Mekong River basin. It is rich in natural resources including water, wetlands, forests and biodiversity. Managing these resources sustainably is essential to meeting its development objectives of reducing poverty while promoting economic growth. Although the upper Mekong River is internationally recognized as important for biodiversity, including large, endangered migratory fish species such as the Giant Catfish, there is currently very little information about the status of these resources. This report is a synthesis of the findings and key points of discussion drawn from three years (2003–2005) of monitoring and assessment, and identifies key areas of concern that require further monitoring and assessment as well as making recommendations for future work. ISBN 978-2-8317-0956-7, 2006 49p.: ill., maps Available in PDF format at: www.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/2006-060.pdf Guide to Sinharaja: a Biodiversity Hotspot of the World Bambaradeniya, Channa N.B.; Ekanayake, Sarath P.; Amarasinghe, Shalini This publication will serve as a concise guide to the Sinharaja rainforest, by providing tips and advice to visitors, and information with regards to its cultural importance. Descriptions and checklists have also been provided for some of the plant and animal species found in this rainforest. ISBN 955-8177-53-1, 2006 vii, 51p.: ill., maps Available from the IUCN Country Office in Sri Lanka. Saving Biodiversity for Human Lives in Northern Pakistan Edwards, Stephen R.; Hugill, Bryan; Khan, Faiz Ali This is a story about how development assistance can conserve biodiversity and improve the lives of rural people. It documents changes in the awareness and capacity of the people of the rugged mountain terrain of Northern Pakistan, and how their enhanced livelihood security has contributed to the conservation of biodiversity of the region. ISBN 969-8141-86-3, 2006 iv, 38p.: ill. Y T I Available from the IUCN Country Office in Pakistan. S R Also available in PDF format at: www.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/2006-051.pdf E DIV O I B 2 Biodiversity in European Development Cooperation: Supporting the Sustainable Development of Partner Countriesues R. Billé, ed.
Recommended publications
  • Conservation Covenants
    Law Commission Consultation Paper No 211 CONSERVATION COVENANTS A Consultation Paper ii THE LAW COMMISSION – HOW WE CONSULT About the Law Commission: The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Rt Hon Lord Justice Lloyd Jones, Chairman, Professor Elizabeth Cooke, David Hertzell, Professor David Ormerod QC and Frances Patterson QC. The Chief Executive is Elaine Lorimer. Topic of this consultation: This Consultation Paper examines the case for introducing “conservation covenants” into the law of England and Wales, and considers how a scheme of conservation covenants might be framed. A conservation covenant is a private agreement made by a landowner, for the purposes of conservation. We discuss the current law and set out a number of provisional proposals and options for reform on which we invite consultees’ views. Geographical scope: The Consultation Paper applies to the law of England and Wales. Impact assessment: In Chapter 9 of this Consultation Paper, consultees are asked also to comment on the likely costs and benefits of any changes provisionally proposed. Consultees’ responses will inform our final recommendations and a formal impact assessment document that will be published with our Report. Availability of materials: This Consultation is available on our website at: http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/consultations/conservation-covenants.htm. Duration of the consultation: We invite responses from 28 March 2013 to 21 June 2013. Comments may be sent: By email to: [email protected] or By post to: Luke Campbell, Law Commission, Steel House, 11 Tothill Street, London SW1H 9LJ Tel: 020 3334 0200 / Fax: 020 3334 0201 If you send your comments by post, it would be helpful if, whenever possible, you could send them to us electronically as well (for example, on CD or by email to the above address, in any commonly used format).
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Element of the General Plan
    General Plan Land Use Element Adopted December 15, 1993 Amended November 9, 2011 Amended July 22, 2015 Amended July 26, 2016 Amended April 26, 2017 Amended September 26, 2017 Amended December 13, 2017 Amended December 17, 2019 Amended October 6, 2020 County of Sacramento Office of Planning and Environmental Review . This page is blank County of Sacramento General Plan Land Use Element Amended October 6, 2020 Table of Contents SECTION I ..................................................................................................................................... 1 ELEMENT INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 Required Contents of the Land Use Element .............................................................................. 1 Concepts of the Land Use Element ............................................................................................. 1 Relationship to Other Elements .................................................................................................. 2 Relationship to Other County Planning Tools ............................................................................ 3 Relationship to Regional Planning Efforts ................................................................................. 6 THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DIAGRAM ......................................................................... 7 How to Use the Land Use Diagram ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Report 2020
    London Borough of Enfield Review of Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation An Addendumx to the Enfield Blue and Green Strategy Final report London Borough of Enfield Review of Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation An Addendum to the Enfield Blue and Green Strategy Version Status Prepared Checked Approved Date 1. Draft report for client comment R. Turner S. Swindlehurst S. Swindlehurst 06.11.2020 A. Coleman R. Glackin 2. Final Report R. Turner R. Turner R. Turner 17.11.2020 3. Final Report – re-issued to take R. Turner R. Turner R. Turner 01.04.2021 into consideration comments from stakeholders Bristol Land Use Consultants Ltd Landscape Design Edinburgh Registered in England Strategic Planning & Assessment Glasgow Registered number 2549296 Development Planning London Registered office: Urban Design & Masterplanning Manchester 250 Waterloo Road Environmental Impact Assessment London SE1 8RD Landscape Planning & Assessment landuse.co.uk Landscape Management 100% recycled paper Ecology Historic Environment GIS & Visualisation Contents Review of Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation November 2020 Contents Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Background 1 Chapter 2 Methods 3 Site Selection 3 Desk Review 3 Site Survey 3 Site Evaluation 4 Limitations 6 Chapter 3 Summary of the SINC Assessment 7 Summary 7 Recommendations 7 Summary of SINC Review 8 Appendix A Figure 1.1-1.3: Biodiversity Assets in the Borough and Figure 1.2 Areas of Deficiency in Access to Nature A-1 Appendix B Figure 3.1: Summary of SINC Review Recommendations B-1 Appendix C Summary of SINC Review C-1 Appendix D Proformas D-1 LUC I i Chapter- 1 Introduction Review of Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation November 2020 Chapter 1 Introduction LUC was appointed in June 2020 by Enfield London Borough Council to undertake a review of existing Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC) within the borough.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Creag Meagaidh National Nature Reserve
    Scotland’s National Nature Reserves For more information about Creag Meagaidh National Nature Reserve please contact: Scottish Natural Heritage, Creag Meagaidh NNR, Aberarder, Kinlochlaggan, Newtonmore, Inverness-shire, PH20 1BX Telephone/Fax: 01528 544 265 Email: [email protected] The Story of Creag Meagaidh National Nature Reserve The Story of Creag Meagaidh National Nature Reserve Foreword Creag Meagaidh National Nature Reserve (NNR), named after the great whalebacked ridge which dominates the Reserve, is one of the most diverse and important upland sites in Scotland. Creag Meagaidh is a complex massif, with numerous mountain tops and an extensive high summit plateau edged by a dramatic series of ice-carved corries and gullies. The Reserve extends from the highest of the mountain tops to the shores of Loch Laggan. The plateau is carpeted in moss-heath and is an important breeding ground for dotterel. The corries support unusual artic- alpine plants and the lower slopes have scattered patches of ancient woodland dominated by birch. Located 45 kilometres (km) northeast of Fort William and covering nearly 4,000 hectares (ha), the Reserve is owned and managed by Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH). Creag Meagaidh has been a NNR since 1986 and during the last twenty years SNH has worked to restore natural habitats, particularly woodland, on the Reserve. Like much of the Highlands, the vegetation has been heavily grazed for centuries, so it was decided to reduce the number of grazing animals by removing sheep and culling red deer. The aim was not to eliminate grazing animals altogether, but to keep numbers at a level that allowed the habitats, especially the woodland, to recover.
    [Show full text]
  • Working at the Landscape Scale: Lessons from the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Planning Process
    Working at the Landscape Scale: Lessons from the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Planning Process By: Anna Bengtson Alyssa Cudmore Brian Fadie David Markowitz A project report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Natural Resources and Environment) at the University of Michigan August 2016 Faculty Advisor: Professor Steven Yaffee Client: U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, California State Office Working at the Landscape Scale: Lessons from the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Planning Process Acknowledgements The authors of this report would like to express our gratitude for the mentorship and assistance of the following with this project: We would like to thank Dr. Steven Yaffee, Professor at the School of Natural Resources and Environment and Director of the Ecosystem Management Initiative at the University of Michigan. His insight and guidance were invaluable for the completion of this report. We would also like to thank Michael Sintetos, Renewable Energy Program Manager for the Bureau of Land Management in California. He was essential for setting up this project and introducing key players and sites to our team. In addition, we want to thank the Bureau of Land Management’s California state office for providing funding that allowed the team to visit the DRECP planning region and meet in-person with individuals. We are also grateful for the funding provided by the University of Michigan’s School of Natural Resources and Environment to assist with the creation and presentation of this material. Lastly, we would like to extend our gratitude to all those who allowed us to inquire about their experiences with the DRECP to allow for a more comprehensive report.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Areas Such As the Cairngorms, Taking Into Consideration the Case for Arrangements on National Park Lines in Scotland.”
    THE MOUNTAIN AREAS OF SCOTLAND -i CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT A report by the COUNTRYSIDE COMMISSION FOR SCOTLAND THE MOUNTAIN AREAS OF SCOTLAND CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT COUNTRYSIDE COMMISSION FOR SCOTLAND Opposite: Glen Affric. 2 CONTENTS CHAIRMAN’S PREFACE 3 INTRODUCTION 4-5 THE VALUE OF OUR MOUNTAIN LAND 7-9 LAND USEAND CHANGE 10-16 WHAT IS GOING WRONG 18-24 PUTTING THINGS RIGHT 25-33 MAKING THINGS HAPPEN 34-37 THE COMMISSION’S RECOMMENDATIONS 38-40 Annex 1: The World Conservation Strategy and Sustainable Development 42 Annex 2: IUCN Categories for Conservation Management and the Concept of Zoning 43 - 44 Annex 3: Outline Powers and Administration of National Parks, Land Management Forums and Joint Committees ... 45 - 47 Annex 4: THE CAIRNGORMS 48 - 50 Annex 5: LOCH LOMOND AND THE TROSSACHS 51 - 53 Annex 6: BEN NEVIS / GLEN COE / BLACK MOUNT 54 -56 Annex 7: WESTER ROSS 57 -59 Annex 8: How the Review was Carried Out 60 Annex 9: Consultees and Contributors to the Review 61 - 62 Annex 10: Bibliography 63 - 64 3 CHAIRMAN’S PREFACE The beauty of Scotland’s countryside is one of our greatest assets. It is the Commission’s duty to promote its conservation, but this can only be achieved with the co-operation, commitment and effort of all those who use and manage the land for many different purposes. The Commission has been involved with few environmental and social issues which generated so much discussion as the question of secur ing the protection of Scotland’s mountain heritage for the benefit, use and enjoyment of present and future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetland Action Plan for British Columbia
    Wetland Action Plan for British Columbia IAN BARNETT Ducks Unlimited Kamloops, 954 A Laval Crescent, Kamloops, BC, V2C 5P5, Canada, email [email protected] Abstract: In the fall of 2002, the Wetland Stewardship Partnership was formed to address the need for improved conservation of wetland ecosystems (including estuaries) in British Columbia. One of the first exercises undertaken by the Wetland Stewardship Partnership was the creation of a Wetland Action Plan. The Wetland Action Plan illustrates the extent of the province's wetlands, describes their value to British Columbians, assesses threats to wetlands, evaluates current conservation initiatives, and puts forth a set of specific actions and objectives to help mitigate wetland loss or degradation. It was determined that the most significant threats to wetlands usually come from urban expansion, industrial development, and agriculture. The Wetland Stewardship Partnership then examined which actions would most likely have the greatest positive influence on wetland conservation and restoration, and listed nine primary objectives, in order of priority, in a draft ‘Framework for Action’. Next, the partnership determined that meeting the first four of these objectives could be sufficient to provide meaningful and comprehensive wetland protection, and so, committed to working together towards enacting specific recommendations in relation to these objectives. These four priority objectives are as follows: (1) Work effectively with all levels of government to promote improved guidelines and stronger legislative frameworks to support wetlands conservation; (2) Provide practical information and recommendations on methods to reduce impacts to wetlands to urban, rural, and agricultural proponents who wish to undertake a development in a wetland area; (3) Improve the development and delivery of public education and stewardship programs that encourage conservation of wetlands, especially through partnerships; and (4) Conduct a conservation risk assessment to make the most current inventory information on the status of B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Biodiversity and Geological Conservation – a Guide to Good Practice
    Planning for Biodiversity PLANNINGand Geological Conservation: A Guide to Good Practice ISBN 13-978 185 112 852 8 ISBN 10-185 112 8522 Price: £18.00 Planning shapes the places where people live and work and the country we live in. It plays a key role in supporting the Government’s wider economic, social and environmental objectives and for sustain- able communities. Planning for Biodiversity and Geological Conservation – A Guide to Good Practice March 2006 Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: London Acknowledgement This guide has been produced by ODPM, Defra and English Nature. The Departments and English Nature wish to thank all those who assisted with the guide including those who kindly gave their permission for the use of case studies and other materials. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister Eland House Bressenden Place London SW1E 5DU Telephone: 020 7944 4400 Website: www.odpm.gov.uk © Crown Copyright, 2006 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. This publication, excluding logos, may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium for research, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to it being reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the publication specified. Any other use of the contents of this publication would require a copyright licence. Please apply for a Click-Use Licence for core material at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ system/online/pLogin.asp, or by writing to the Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich, NR3 1BQ.
    [Show full text]
  • General Plan 2040 August 2019 Draft
    General Plan 2040 August 2019 Draft TABLE OF CONTENTS How to Read this Preliminary General Plan Draft ............................................................................... 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Trends and Forecasts ........................................................................................................................ 5 Sustainability Framework ................................................................................................................ 12 Section 1: Natural Resource Planning ................................................................................................ 15 Goals ................................................................................................................................................ 15 Protecting Native Habitats & Wildlife ............................................................................................ 15 Protecting Coastal Resources ......................................................................................................... 20 Coastal Habitat .......................................................................................................................... 20 Wetland Habitat ........................................................................................................................ 22 Managing Streams and Watersheds .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Open Mosaic Habitats High Value Guidance: When Is Brownfield Land of ‘High Environmental Value’?
    Open mosaic habitats high value guidance: when is brownfield land of ‘high environmental value’? Wildlife and Countryside Link Wildlife and Countryside Link (Link) brings together 45 voluntary organisations concerned with the conservation and protection of wildlife and the countryside. Our members practise and advocate environmentally sensitive land management, and encourage respect for and enjoyment of natural landscapes and features, the historic and marine environment and biodiversity. Taken together our members have the support of over 8 million people in the UK and manage over 750,000 hectares of land. This guidance is supported by the following nine organisations: Amphibian and Reptile Conservation British Mountaineering Council Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust Butterfly Conservation Campaign to Protect Rural England Open Spaces Society Royal Society for the Protection Birds The Ramblers The Wildlife Trusts Introduction Redeveloping brownfield land can provide sustainable development opportunities, reduce pressure on the Green Belt and other undeveloped land, and offer chances to promote economic regeneration. However, a minority of previously developed sites are havens for wildlife. Two of the UK’s top sites for wildlife diversity, are brownfield land and support some of the UK’s most scarce and threatened species. In many cases they provide the last ‘wild space’ in urban areas for local communities, allowing them access to nature and consequently improving the communities’ well-being. The National Planning Policy Framework is explicit that ‘previously developed’ land, treated as synonymous with ‘brownfield’, should be prioritised for development as long as it is not of ‘high environmental value’. Further clarity on this is not provided and there is currently no definition of ‘high environmental value’.
    [Show full text]
  • Collier County, FL
    COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Prepared by Collier County Planning and Zoning Department Comprehensive Planning Section Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Adopted October, 1997 AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT SYMBOL DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. May 1, 1990 90-32 February 5, 1991 91-15 May 19, 1992 92-34 May 9, 2000 2000-25 ** May 9, 2000 2000-26 *** (I) May 9, 2000 2000-27 (II) October 22, 2002 2002-54 (III) June 19, 2002 2002-32 ***** (IV) December 16, 2003 2003-67 (V) October 26, 2004 2004-71 (VI) January 25, 2007 2007-16 # (VII) December 14, 2010 2010-49 ## (VIII) October 25, 2011 2011-40 (IX) January 8, 2013 2013-12 ### (X) January 27, 2015 2015-07 (XI) June 13, 2017 2017-20 ♦ The parenthesized Roman numeral symbols enumerated above appear throughout this Element and provide informational citations to adopted documents recorded in the Official Records of Collier County, as required by Florida law. These symbols are for informational purposes only, meant to mark entries amended after the 1997 adoption of the full Element and typically found in the margins of this document, but are not themselves adopted. Note: Amendments made by Ordinance Nos. 90-32, 91-15 and 92-34 are no longer denoted on the pages of the Element with Roman numeral symbols. * Indicates adopted portions. ** Ordinance No. 2000-25 rescinded and repealed in its entirety Collier County Ordinance No. 99-63, which had the effect of rescinding certain EAR-based (1996 EAR objectives and policies at issue in Administration Commission Case No.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Planning in the Mississippi River Alluvial Plain
    Conservation Planning in the Mississippi River Alluvial Plain Photo courtesy of Nancy Webb The Nature Conservancy 2002 Conservation Planning in the Mississippi River Alluvial Plain (Ecoregion 42) The Nature Conservancy May, 2002 For questions or comments on this document contact The Nature Conservancy at P.O. Box 4125, Baton Rouge, LA, 70821. (225) 338-1040 ii Preface The information presented herein is the result of four years of conservation planning and represents two iterations of the Mississippi River Alluvial Plain (MSRAP) ecoregional plan as developed by The Nature Conservancy (TNC) and many partners. The bulk of the text describes the process the MSRAP team undertook to: • identify important biological species, communities, and ecological systems, commonly referred to as “conservation targets,” existing in the ecoregion; and • select priority sites, or conservation areas, for biodiversity conservation based on the perceived viability of those targets. It should be noted that a considerable amount of time was spent developing data as few Heritage data, the common building blocks of TNC’s ecoregional plans, were available for the ecoregion. Much of the emphasis on data collection was focused on terrestrial targets. The dearth of aquatics data required that the team rely heavily on the use of coarse filter, abiotic information to identify aquatic systems warranting further investigation. To help fill the gap in aquatics data and better inform MSRAP conservation planning, the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation provided funding to TNC’s Southeast Conservation Science Center and Freshwater Initiative to assess freshwater biodiversity in several southeast ecoregions including the Mississippi Embayment Basin (MEB), of which MSRAP is a part.
    [Show full text]