DOCSLIB.ORG

Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests REVISED DRAFT Forest Assessments: Terrestrial Species Overviews March 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests REVISED DRAFT Forest Assessments: Terrestrial Species Overviews March 2018 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests REVISED DRAFT Forest Assessments: Terrestrial Species Overviews March 2018 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected] (link sends e-mail). USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. 2 Contents Alberta arctic butterfly (Oeneis alberta) ....................................................................................................... 5 American Bittern (Botarus lentiginosus) ....................................................................................................... 6 American Marten (Martes americana) ......................................................................................................... 8 Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) ....................................................................................................... 14 Activity-Specific Guidelines ................................................................................................................. 16 Black-footed Ferret (Mustela nigripes) ....................................................................................................... 21 Black Swift (Cypseloides niger) .................................................................................................................... 23 Boreal Owl (Aegolius funereus) ................................................................................................................... 25 Brewer’s Sparrow (Spizella breweri) ........................................................................................................... 28 Brown-capped Rosy Finch (Leucosticte australis) ....................................................................................... 36 Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia) ........................................................................................................... 39 Canada Lynx (Lynx canadensis) ................................................................................................................... 42 APPENDIX. RGNF Lynx Habitat Mapping Criteria (USDA Forest Service 2011). ...................................... 53 Cassin’s Finch (Haemorhous cassinii) S. F. Baird, 1854 ............................................................................. 54 Desert Green (Comstock’s) hairstreak (Callophrys comstocki) ................................................................... 55 Dark blue butterfly (Plebejus idas sublivens) .............................................................................................. 57 Desert Bighorn Sheep (Ovis Canadensis nelsoni) ........................................................................................ 58 Ferruginous Hawk (Buteo regalis) ............................................................................................................... 75 Flammulated Owl (Psiloscops (=Otus) flammeolus) ................................................................................... 78 Fringed Myotis (Myotis thysanodes) ........................................................................................................... 82 Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) ............................................................................................................... 87 Grace’s Warbler (Setophaga graciae) ......................................................................................................... 91 Nokomis fritillary, Great Basin Silverspot, (Speyeria Nokomis) .................................................................. 93 Gunnison sage-grouse (Centrocercus minimus) .......................................................................................... 94 Gunnison’s Prairie Dog (Cynomys gunnisoni (gunnisoni = pop. 1)) .......................................................... 105 Hoary Bat (Lasiurus cinereus) .................................................................................................................... 110 Juniper titmouse (Baeolophus ridgwayi) .................................................................................................. 115 Lewis’s Woodpecker (Melanerpes lewis) .................................................................................................. 116 Loggerhead Shrike (Lanius ludovicianus) .................................................................................................. 121 Mojave sootywing butterfly (Hesperopsis Libya) ...................................................................................... 123 Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) ...................................................................................................... 124 Northern Harrier (Circus cyaneus) ............................................................................................................ 128 3 Olive-sided Flycatcher (Contopus cooperi) ............................................................................................... 133 American peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus anatum) ............................................................................ 137 Purple Martin (Progne subis) .................................................................................................................... 140 Rhesus skipper (Polites rhesus) ................................................................................................................. 145 River Otter (Lontra canadensis) ................................................................................................................ 146 Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep (Ovis canadensis canadensis) ................................................................ 151 Sage Sparrow (= Sagebrush Sparrow) (Amphispiza belli [a.k.a. Artemisiospiza nevadensis]) .................. 164 Spotted bat (Euderma maculatum) .......................................................................................................... 167 (Pale) Townsend’s big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii (pallescens)) ............................................... 169 Uncompahgre Fritillary Butterfly (Boloria [improba] acrocnema) ........................................................... 174 Appendix. San Juan Metadata and Mapping Criteria .......................................................................... 178 Western Bumble Bee (Bombus occidentalis) ............................................................................................ 180 Appendix- Bombus occidentalis observations and data from the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory (RMBL). ............................................................................................................................................... 183 White-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys leucurus)............................................................................................ 186 Southern White-tailed Ptarmigan (Lagopus leucurus altipetens) ............................................................. 188 White-veined arctic butterfly (Oeneis bore) ............................................................................................. 192 Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii) ...................................................................................................... 194 Western Yellow-billed Cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus occidentalis) ........................................................ 195 Yellow-dotted alpine butterfly (Erebia pawlowskii) ................................................................................. 199 4 Alberta arctic butterfly (Oeneis alberta) 1. Status: Table 1 summarizes the current status of this species or subspecies by various ranking entity and defines the meaning of the status. Table 1. Current status of Alberta Arctic Entity Status Status Definition NatureServe G5 State
Load more

Recommended publications
  • University of Oklahoma Graduate College
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE POTENTIAL FIELD STUDIES OF THE CENTRAL SAN LUIS BASIN AND SAN JUAN MOUNTAINS, COLORADO AND NEW MEXICO, AND SOUTHERN AND WESTERN AFGHANISTAN A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By BENJAMIN JOHN DRENTH Norman, Oklahoma 2009 POTENTIAL FIELD STUDIES OF THE CENTRAL SAN LUIS BASIN AND SAN JUAN MOUNTAINS, COLORADO AND NEW MEXICO, AND SOUTHERN AND WESTERN AFGHANISTAN A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE CONOCOPHILLIPS SCHOOL OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS BY _______________________________ Dr. G. Randy Keller, Chair _______________________________ Dr. V.J.S. Grauch _______________________________ Dr. Carol Finn _______________________________ Dr. R. Douglas Elmore _______________________________ Dr. Ze’ev Reches _______________________________ Dr. Carl Sondergeld © Copyright by BENJAMIN JOHN DRENTH 2009 All Rights Reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..……1 Chapter A: Geophysical Constraints on Rio Grande Rift Structure in the Central San Luis Basin, Colorado and New Mexico………………………………………………………...2 Chapter B: A Geophysical Study of the San Juan Mountains Batholith, southwestern Colorado………………………………………………………………………………….61 Chapter C: Geophysical Expression of Intrusions and Tectonic Blocks of Southern and Western Afghanistan…………………………………………………………………....110 Conclusions……………………………………………………………………………..154 iv LIST OF TABLES Chapter A: Geophysical Constraints on Rio Grande Rift Structure in the Central
    [Show full text]
  • APPEAL of DECISION NOTICE, GUNNISON RANGER DISTRICT Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests
    APPEAL OF DECISION NOTICE, GUNNISON RANGER DISTRICT Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests DOUBLE HEART RANCH, ON BEHALF OF LOCAL LANDOWNERS AND INTERESTED CITIZENS APPELLANTS Notice of Appeal, Statement of Reasons and Request for Relief Regarding the Geothermal Lease Nomination COC- 73584 EA and DN v. CHARLES RICHMOND GMUG FOREST SUPERVISOR AND JOHN MURPHY GUNNISON RANGER DISTRICT RESPONDENTS NOTICE OF APPEAL STATEMENT OF REASONS AND RELIEF REQUESTED DATED this 25 th day of March, 2011 Matthew R. Jones Double Heart Ranch 7500 County Road 887 Gunnison, CO 81230 Direct: (512) 635-7814 Fax: (214) 378-7501 Email: [email protected] David Brown Ranch Manager: (970) 641-0690 1 NOTICE OF APPEAL On February 10, 2011, Forest Supervisor Charles Richmond signed the Decision Notice for Geothermal Lease Nomination COC-73584. This is a Notice of Appeal of that decision pursuant to 36 C.F.R. Part 215. The Double Heart Ranch, Local Landowners, and a great many others use and enjoy the Tomichi Dome, and the surrounding lands covered by this decision. Further, DH Ranch submitted comments at every stage of this process to every agency involved to be considered for this National Environmental Policy Act process. DH Ranch also attended every public meeting, even when notice was grossly insufficient and public comment was inappropriately restricted and prevented. This appeal is timely pursuant to 36 C.F.R. §215.14. Appellant requests that the DN be withdrawn, a proper NEPA process be conducted, and a new decision of No Action be issued, protecting our public resources. THE APPELLANTS The Double Heart Ranch is a historic Colorado property wholly situated on or around the Tomichi Dome and the property encompassed by this decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests Road - Light Duty ¤£87 Q Private Intermittent Stream 550 Disclaimer ¤£ ¤£50 114 U.S
    9 9 9 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 9 2 2 0 00 0 9000 0 0 0 9 9 000 0 2 9 0 200 9 0 96 0 2 0 00 0 ! 00 ! 90 8800 90 C o 94 ! 00 k 9600 a e 0 17 80 l e 8 9 ! 9 9 C 0 16 r 2 40 0 0 ! 00 00 13 0 0 9 r 940 9 C 14 200 0 18 e ! 15 ! ! s e k a k e l 7 l 00 4 e 90 17 15 0 r ! a 16 9400 0 00 14 C 17 D 6 C r 9 Propose13d Whitehouse Add1i8tions to the 20 ! h e ! k c a W t 8600 8 ! r t ! n x Willow i 7 7 o h 8 n e 2 9200 D 1 F i 0 D 9400 o t 0 0 t Swamp e n n 5 s 9 h Mt. Sneffels Wilderness, 2 00 8 ! 00 w 78 e ! D o o 7 u i W T t 2 ! 1 V c s ! 5 0 Moonshine y e 0 . a ! 0 h 6 60 2 n a 8 9 7 c C March 22, 2018 ! 0 A 0 e w 960 r Park ! g 9600 5 C e ! d 8 r Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre i e e 8 k ! e R ! 5 00 k 6 ! 9 ! 2 ! ! . Lake 9600 0 1 1 40 . and Gunnison 9 A ! Map depicts proLpenooresed boundaries for the Whitehouse ! 1 ! 21 5 ! ! 9 ! ! 8 8 0 ! 0 0 ! 22 9 B 0 6 National Forests Additions to the Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution, Epidemiological Characteristics and Control Methods of the Pathogen Nosema Ceranae Fries in Honey Bees Apis Mellifera L
    Arch Med Vet 47, 129-138 (2015) REVIEW Distribution, epidemiological characteristics and control methods of the pathogen Nosema ceranae Fries in honey bees Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera, Apidae) Distribución, características epidemiológicas y métodos de control del patógeno Nosema ceranae Fries en abejas Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera, Apidae) X Aranedaa*, M Cumianb, D Moralesa aAgronomy School, Natural Resources Faculty, Universidad Católica de Temuco, Temuco, Chile. bAgriculture and Livestock Service (SAG), Coyhaique, Chile. RESUMEN El parásito microsporidio Nosema ceranae, hasta hace algunos años fue considerado como patógeno de Apis cerana solamente, sin embargo en el último tiempo se ha demostrado que puede afectar con gran virulencia a Apis mellifera. Por esta razón, ha sido denunciado como un agente patógeno activo en la desaparición de las colonias de abejas en el mundo, infectando a todos los miembros de la colonia. Es importante mencionar que las abejas son ampliamente utilizadas para la polinización y la producción de miel, de ahí su importancia en la agricultura, además de desempeñar un papel ecológico importante en la polinización de las plantas donde un tercio de los cultivos de alimentos son polinizados por abejas, al igual que muchas plantas consumidas por animales. En este contexto, esta revisión pretende resumir la información generada por diferentes autores con relación a distribución geográfica, características morfológicas y genéticas, sintomatología y métodos de control que se realizan en aquellos países donde está presente N. ceranae, de manera de tener mayores herramientas para enfrentar la lucha contra esta nueva enfermedad apícola. Palabras clave: parásito, microsporidio, Apis mellifera, Nosema ceranae. SUMMARY Up until a few years ago, the microsporidian parasite Nosema ceranae was considered to be a pathogen of Apis cerana exclusively; however, only recently it has shown to be very virulent to Apis mellifera.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico
    Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico William H. Romme, M. Lisa Floyd, David Hanna with contributions by Elisabeth J. Bartlett, Michele Crist, Dan Green, Henri D. Grissino-Mayer, J. Page Lindsey, Kevin McGarigal, & Jeffery S.Redders Produced by the Colorado Forest Restoration Institute at Colorado State University, and Region 2 of the U.S. Forest Service May 12, 2009 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY … p 5 AUTHORS’ AFFILIATIONS … p 16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS … p 16 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION A. Objectives and Organization of This Report … p 17 B. Overview of Physical Geography and Vegetation … p 19 C. Climate Variability in Space and Time … p 21 1. Geographic Patterns in Climate 2. Long-Term Variability in Climate D. Reference Conditions: Concept and Application … p 25 1. Historical Range of Variability (HRV) Concept 2. The Reference Period for this Analysis 3. Human Residents and Influences during the Reference Period E. Overview of Integrated Ecosystem Management … p 30 F. Literature Cited … p 34 CHAPTER II. PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS A. Vegetation Structure and Composition … p 39 B. Reference Conditions … p 40 1. Reference Period Fire Regimes 2. Other agents of disturbance 3. Pre-1870 stand structures C. Legacies of Euro-American Settlement and Current Conditions … p 67 1. Logging (“High-Grading”) in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 2. Excessive Livestock Grazing in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 3. Fire Exclusion Since the Late 1800s 4. Interactions: Logging, Grazing, Fire, Climate, and the Forests of Today D. Summary … p 83 E. Literature Cited … p 84 CHAPTER III.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of San Bernardino County, California
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera Recorded for Imperial County California Compiled by Jeffrey Caldwell [email protected] 1-925-949-8696 Note
    Lepidoptera Recorded for Imperial County California Compiled by Jeffrey Caldwell [email protected] 1-925-949-8696 Note: BMNA = Butterflies and Moths of North America web site MPG = Moth Photographers Group web site Most are from the Essig Museum’s California Moth Specimens Database web site Arctiidae. Tiger and Lichen Moths. Apantesis proxima (Notarctia proxima). Mexican Tiger Moth. 8181 [BMNA] Ectypia clio (clio). Clio Tiger Moth. 8249 Estigmene acrea (acrea). Salt Marsh Moth. 8131 Euchaetes zella. 8232 Autostichidae (Deoclonidae). Oegoconia novimundi. Four-spotted Yellowneck Moth. 1134 (Oegoconia quadripuncta mis-applied) Bucculatricidae. Ribbed Cocoon-maker Moths. Bucculatrix enceliae. Brittlebrush Moth. 0546 Cossidae. Goat Moths, Carpenterworm Moths, and Leopard Moths. Comadia henrici. 2679 Givira mucida. 2660 Hypopta palmata. 2656 Prionoxystus robiniae (mixtus). Carpenterworm or Locust Borer. 2693 Depressariidae. Pseudethmia protuberans. 1008 [MPG] Ethmiidae. Now assigned to Depressariidae. Ethmiinae. Ethmia timberlakei. 0984 Pseudethmia protuberans. 1008 Gelechiidae. Twirler Moths. Aristotelia adceanotha. 1726 [Sighting 1019513 BMNA] Chionodes abdominella. 2054 Chionodes dentella. 2071 Chionodes fructuaria. 2078 Chionodes kincaidella. 2086 (reared from Atriplex acanthocarpa in Texas) Chionodes oecus. 2086.2 Chionodes sistrella. 2116 Chionodes xanthophilella. 2125 Faculta inaequalis. Palo Verde Webworm. 2206 Friseria cockerelli. Mesquite Webworm. 1916 Gelechia desiliens. 1938 Isophrictis sabulella. 1701 Keiferia lycopersicella. Tomato Pinworm. 2047 Pectinophora gossypiella. Pink Bollworm. 2261 Prolita puertella. 1895 Prolita veledae. 1903 Geometridae. Inchworm Moths, Loopers, Geometers, or Measuring Worms. Archirhoe neomexicana. 7295 Chesiadodes coniferaria. 6535 Chlorochlamys appellaria. 7073 Cyclophora nanaria. Dwarf Tawny Wave. W 7140 Dichorda illustraria. 7055 Dichordophora phoenix. Phoenix Emerald. 7057 Digrammia colorata. Creosote Moth. 6381 Digrammia irrorata (rubricata). 6395 Digrammia pictipennata. 6372 Digrammia puertata.
    [Show full text]
  • Within Colony Dynamics of Nosema Bombi Infections: Disease Establishment, Epidemiology and Potential Vertical Transmission Samina T
    Within colony dynamics of Nosema bombi infections: disease establishment, epidemiology and potential vertical transmission Samina T. Rutrecht, Mark J.F. Brown To cite this version: Samina T. Rutrecht, Mark J.F. Brown. Within colony dynamics of Nosema bombi infections: disease establishment, epidemiology and potential vertical transmission. Apidologie, Springer Verlag, 2008, 39 (5), pp.504-514. hal-00891946 HAL Id: hal-00891946 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00891946 Submitted on 1 Jan 2008 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Apidologie 39 (2008) 504–514 Available online at: c INRA/DIB-AGIB/ EDP Sciences, 2008 www.apidologie.org DOI: 10.1051/apido:2008031 Original article Within colony dynamics of Nosema bombi infections: disease establishment, epidemiology and potential vertical transmission* Samina T. Rutrecht1,2,MarkJ.F.Brown1 1 Department of Zoology, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland 2 Windward Islands Research and Education Foundation, PO Box 7, Grenada, West Indies Received 20 November 2007 – Revised 27 February 2008 – Accepted 28 March 2008 Abstract – Successful growth and transmission is a prerequisite for a parasite to maintain itself in its host population. Nosema bombi is a ubiquitous and damaging parasite of bumble bees, but little is known about its transmission and epidemiology within bumble bee colonies.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of the Tolman Bridge Area (2000-2011)
    LEPIDOPTERA OF THE TOLMAN BRIDGE AREA, ALBERTA, 2000-2011 Charles Bird, 8 March 2012 Box 22, Erskine, AB T0C 1G0 [email protected] The present paper includes a number of redeterminations and additions to the information in earlier reports. It also follows the up-to-date order and taxonomy of Pohl et al. (2010), rather than that of Hodges et al. (1983). Brian Scholtens, Greg Pohl and Jean-François Landry collecting moths at a sheet illuminated by a mercury vapor (MV) light, Tolman Bridge, 24 July 2003, during the 2003 Olds meetings of the Lepidopterist’s Society (C.D. Bird image). Tolman Bridge, is located in the valley of the Red Deer River, 18 km (10 miles) east of the town of Trochu. The bridge and adjoining Park land are in the north half of section 14, range 22, township 34, west of the Fourth Meridian. The coordinates at the bridge are 51.503N and 113.009W. The elevation ranges from around 600 m at the river to 800 m or so near the top of the river breaks. In a Natural Area Inspection Report dated 25 June 1982 and in the 1989 Trochu 82 P/14, 1:50,000 topographic map, the land southwest of the bridge was designated as the “Tolman Bridge Municipal Park” while that southeast of the bridge was referred to as the “Tolman Bridge Recreation Area”. In an Alberta, Department of the Environment, Parks and Protected Areas Division paper dated 9 May 2000, the areas on both sides of the river are included in “Dry Island Buffalo Jump Provincial Park”.
    [Show full text]
  • NOVITATES PUBLISHED by the AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL HISTORY CITY of NEW YORK MAY 6, 1953 NUMBER 1626 the SUBSPECIES of OENEIS ALBERTA (LEPIDOPTERA, SATYRIDAE) by F
    AVMER]ICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CITY OF NEW YORK MAY 6, 1953 NUMBER 1626 THE SUBSPECIES OF OENEIS ALBERTA (LEPIDOPTERA, SATYRIDAE) By F. MARTIN BROWN' For some years Oeneis alberta oslari Skinner has been a very rare butterfly in collections. In early June, 1951, I had the good for- tune to find it rather plentiful in South Park, Park County, Colo- rado. The circumstances leading to its rediscovery and some notes on its habitat have been published (1952, Ent. News, vol. 63, pp. 119-123). This recently captured series of oslari affords the first opportunity to compare critically the three named entities that compose the species. The first-named of these, alberta Elwes and Edwards, is found on the prairies of Alberta and Saskatche- wan and is the best known of the three. During the following year Strecker described daura from the mountains of Arizona. This subspecies remained "lost" until D. K. Duncan, then of Globe, Arizona, recovered it in the vicinity of McNary in the White Mountains of Arizona during the early thirties. Oslari was last described. So far as I know the only true oslari in museum col- lections are the two pairs sent by Oslar to Skinner. All others that I have seen have been abberant Oeneis uhleri uhleri Reakirt. The data of Oslar's specimens misled collectors; they were taken in September, 1909. With almost 100 specimens representing the species before me it is quite evident that daura is distinctive a large, pale tawny creature. The other two subspecies are much alike, smaller and grayer than daura.
    [Show full text]
  • An Abstract of the Thesis Of
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Sarah A. Maxfield-Taylor for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology presented on March 26, 2014. Title: Natural Enemies of Native Bumble Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Western Oregon Abstract approved: _____________________________________________ Sujaya U. Rao Bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) are important native pollinators in wild and agricultural systems, and are one of the few groups of native bees commercially bred for use in the pollination of a range of crops. In recent years, declines in bumble bees have been reported globally. One factor implicated in these declines, believed to affect bumble bee colonies in the wild and during rearing, is natural enemies. A diversity of fungi, protozoa, nematodes, and parasitoids has been reported to affect bumble bees, to varying extents, in different parts of the world. In contrast to reports of decline elsewhere, bumble bees have been thriving in Oregon on the West Coast of the U.S.A.. In particular, the agriculturally rich Willamette Valley in the western part of the state appears to be fostering several species. Little is known, however, about the natural enemies of bumble bees in this region. The objectives of this thesis were to: (1) identify pathogens and parasites in (a) bumble bees from the wild, and (b) bumble bees reared in captivity and (2) examine the effects of disease on bee hosts. Bumble bee queens and workers were collected from diverse locations in the Willamette Valley, in spring and summer. Bombus mixtus, Bombus nevadensis, and Bombus vosnesenskii collected from the wild were dissected and examined for pathogens and parasites, and these organisms were identified using morphological and molecular characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Bumble Bee Surveys in the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area of Oregon and Washington
    Bumble Bee Surveys in the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area of Oregon and Washington Final report from the Xerces Society to the U.S. Forest Service and Interagency Special Status/Sensitive Species Program (ISSSSP) Agreement L13AC00102, Modification 5 Bombus vosnesenskii on Balsamorhiza sagittata. Photo by Rich Hatfield, the Xerces Society. By Rich Hatfield, Sarina Jepsen, and Scott Black, the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation September 2017 1 Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Site Selection ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Site Descriptions (west to east) ................................................................................................................ 7 T14ES27 (USFS) ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Cape Horn (USFS) .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]