DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents Introduction Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Background ................................................................................................................................................. 8 SECTION ONE ........................................................................................................................................ 11 Regional Context and History ................................................................................................................ 11 History of Bronzeville ......................................................................................................................... 11 Regional Setting ................................................................................................................................. 14 Relationship to GO TO 2040 Regional Comprehensive Plan ............................................................ 15 Land use planning and zoning ........................................................................................................... 16 Planning process ................................................................................................................................. 18 SECTION TWO ....................................................................................................................................... 21 Previous Plans and Studies ..................................................................................................................... 21 SECTION THREE ................................................................................................................................... 28 Community Outreach .............................................................................................................................. 28 SECTION FOUR ..................................................................................................................................... 37 Demographic Profile ................................................................................................................................ 37 Key findings: ....................................................................................................................................... 37 Population and households ................................................................................................................. 38 Race and ethnicity............................................................................................................................... 40 Age and Income .................................................................................................................................. 41 Educational attainment ...................................................................................................................... 42 Employment status of Bronzeville residents ....................................................................................... 42 SECTION FIVE ........................................................................................................................................ 43 Economic Assessment ............................................................................................................................. 43 Key findings: ....................................................................................................................................... 43 Employment trends ............................................................................................................................. 44 Commercial property .......................................................................................................................... 49 SECTION SIX .......................................................................................................................................... 52 Land Use and Development ................................................................................................................... 52 Key findings: ....................................................................................................................................... 52 Land use in the commercial corridors ................................................................................................. 53 Zoning ................................................................................................................................................ 59 Page 3 SECTION SEVEN ................................................................................................................................... 62 Housing ..................................................................................................................................................... 62 Key findings: ....................................................................................................................................... 62 Housing type and age ......................................................................................................................... 62 Housing occupancy, tenure, value, and foreclosures .......................................................................... 63 Public-housing in the Bronzeville study area ..................................................................................... 66 SECTION EIGHT .................................................................................................................................... 68 Transportation and Circulation ............................................................................................................. 68 Key findings: ....................................................................................................................................... 68 Functional classification and design of roadways............................................................................... 69 Public Transit ..................................................................................................................................... 71 Walking and Bicycling ....................................................................................................................... 74 Transportation indicators ................................................................................................................... 76 SECTION NINE ...................................................................................................................................... 79 Natural Environment .............................................................................................................................. 79 Key findings: ....................................................................................................................................... 79 Green infrastructure ........................................................................................................................... 79 SECTION TEN ........................................................................................................................................ 82 Community Facilities and Services ....................................................................................................... 82 Key findings: ....................................................................................................................................... 82 Crime and safety ................................................................................................................................. 87 LOOKING FORWARD ......................................................................................................................... 89 Future Land Use Directions ............................................................................................................... 89 Related Recommendations for Future Consideration ......................................................................... 91 Page 4 This Existing Conditions Report is organized in the following sections: Introduction Section 1: Regional Context and History Section 2: Previous Plans and Studies Section 3: Community Outreach Section 4: Demographic Profile Section 5: Economic Assessment Section 6: Land Use Section 7: Housing Section 8: Transportation Section 9: Natural Environment Section 10: Community Facilities and Services Looking Forward Funding Acknowledgement CMAP would like to thank the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for funding the development and production of this document. This project is funded through HUD’s Sustainable Communities Regional Planning grant, which supports CMAP’s Local Technical Assistance (LTA) program Page 5 Introduction This Existing Conditions Report is derived from two years of research, analysis, and community engagement activities. It provides an overview of the current conditions in three key commercial corridors in Bronzeville: 43rd, 47th, and 51st Streets. It also outlines the current conditions in the neighborhood surrounding the study area. It is designed to provide a starting point for creating a shared vision of the future of these three retail corridors. The driving force in planning is always the need for change, the need for improved management of community assets and resources, or the need for a significantly altered pattern of land use due to changing circumstances. Planners face many challenges when developing a plan to revitalize
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planners Guide to Chicago 2013
    Planners Guide to Chicago 2013 2013 Lake Baha’i Glenview 41 Wilmette Temple Central Old 14 45 Orchard Northwestern 294 Waukegan Golf Univ 58 Milwaukee Sheridan Golf Morton Mill Grove 32 C O N T E N T S Dempster Skokie Dempster Evanston Des Main 2 Getting Around Plaines Asbury Skokie Oakton Northwest Hwy 4 Near the Hotels 94 90 Ridge Crawford 6 Loop Walking Tour Allstate McCormick Touhy Arena Lincolnwood 41 Town Center Pratt Park Lincoln 14 Chinatown Ridge Loyola Devon Univ 16 Hyde Park Peterson 14 20 Lincoln Square Bryn Mawr Northeastern O’Hare 171 Illinois Univ Clark 22 Old Town International Foster 32 Airport North Park Univ Harwood Lawrence 32 Ashland 24 Pilsen Heights 20 32 41 Norridge Montrose 26 Printers Row Irving Park Bensenville 32 Lake Shore Dr 28 UIC and Taylor St Addison Western Forest Preserve 32 Wrigley Field 30 Wicker Park–Bucktown Cumberland Harlem Narragansett Central Cicero Oak Park Austin Laramie Belmont Elston Clybourn Grand 43 Broadway Diversey Pulaski 32 Other Places to Explore Franklin Grand Fullerton 3032 DePaul Park Milwaukee Univ Lincoln 36 Chicago Planning Armitage Park Zoo Timeline Kedzie 32 North 64 California 22 Maywood Grand 44 Conference Sponsors Lake 50 30 Park Division 3032 Water Elmhurst Halsted Tower Oak Chicago Damen Place 32 Park Navy Butterfield Lake 4 Pier 1st Madison United Center 6 290 56 Illinois 26 Roosevelt Medical Hines VA District 28 Soldier Medical Ogden Field Center Cicero 32 Cermak 24 Michigan McCormick 88 14 Berwyn Place 45 31st Central Park 32 Riverside Illinois Brookfield Archer 35th
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis Locally Preferred Alternative Report
    SOUTHEAST CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DOCUMENT #9 LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REPORT PREPARED BY AUGUST 2011 METRA – SOUTHEAST CORRIDOR LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REPORT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DOCUMENTS 1. Detailed Work Scope 2. Purpose & Need 3. Initial Alternatives, Part I: Modes & Technologies 4. Evaluation Methodology 5. Initial Alternatives, Part I Screening and Part II: Conceptual Design 6. Screening of Initial Alternatives, Part II 7. Feasible Alternatives 8. Screening of Feasible Alternatives 9. Locally Preferred Alternative Report AECOM AUGUST 2011 I METRA – SOUTHEAST CORRIDOR LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 1 A. PURPOSE.................................................................................................................. 1 B. BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................... 1 II. SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS.............................................................. 5 A. INITIAL SCREENING, PART I................................................................................... 5 B. DEFINITION AND SCREENING OF INITIAL ALTERNATIVES, PART II.................. 7 C. DEFINITION OF FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES ........................................................ 10 D. DETAILED FINAL SCREENING.............................................................................. 11 III. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUMMARY.......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • High Rise Agreement by and Between Apartment
    FOR ABOMA MEMBER USE ONLY Apartment Building Owners and Managers Association of Illinois HIGH RISE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN APARTMENT BUILDING OWNERS AND MANAGERS ASSOCIATION OF ILLINOIS and SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 1 Residential Division for the period DECEMBER 1, 2014 THROUGH NOVEMBER 30, 2017 Covering Head Janitors and Other Employees as specified in Article II, Section 1(g) who are employed in ABOMA Member High Rise (Fireproof) Buildings who have authorized ABOMA to include them in this agreement. ABOMA Presidential Towers 625 West Madison Street Suite 1403 Chicago, Illinois 60661 Phone: (312) 902-2266 FAX: (312) 284-4577 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: aboma.com Apartment Building Owners and Managers Association of Illinois ABOMA SEIU LOCAL 1 JANITORIAL COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT OVERVIEW OF CHANGES EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 1, 2014 JANITORIAL EMPLOYEES—HIGH RISE BUILDINGS Pages I through III is an Overview of the changes in the terms, wages and benefits which become effective December 1, 2014 in the High Rise Agreement by and between ABOMA and Building Services Division of SEIU Local 1 for the period beginning December 1, 2014 through November 30, 2017 Covering Head Janitors and Other Employees as specified in Article II, Section 1(g) who are employed in ABOMA Member High Rise (Fireproof) Buildings who have authorized ABOMA to include them in this agreement. Please reference the full CBA to fully understand the language changes highlighted in the Overview-pages I through III This agreement does not cover non-member buildings or Member Buildings who have not authorized ABOMA to include them in the negotiations or the resulting contract.
    [Show full text]
  • EVALUATION of the URBAN INITIATIVES: Anti-Crime
    f U.u-(;(;L40b.+ Contract HC-5231 EVALUATION OF THE URBAN INITIATIVES ANTI-CRIME PROGRAM CHICAGO, IL, CASE STUDY 1984 Prepared for: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research Prepared by: Police Foundation John F. Kennedy School of Government The views and conclusions presented in this report are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Department of Housing and Urban Development or of the United States Government I This report is one in a series that comprises a comprehensive evaluation of the Public Housing Urban Initiatives Anti-Crime Demonstration. The Final Report provides an integrated analysis of the design, implementation and impact of the entire demonstration, and each of the 15 site-specific case studies analyzes the implementation and impact of the programs at individual partici­ pating local housing authorities. The complete set of reports includes: Evaluation of the Urban Initiatives Anti-Crime Program: Final Report Evaluation of the Urban Initiatives Anti-Crime Program: Baltimore, MD, Case Study Charlotte, NC, Case Study Chicago, IL, Case Study Cleveland, OH, Case Study Dade County, FL, Case Stu~ Hampton, VA, Case Study Hartford, CT, Case Stu~ Jackson,1 , Case Study Jersey City, NJ, Case Study Louisville, KY, Case Study Oxnard County, CA, Case Study San Antonio, TX, Case Study Seattle, WA, Case Study Tampa, FL, Case Study Toledo, OH, Case Study Each of the above reports is available from HUD USER for a handling charge. For information contact: HUD USER Post Office Box 280 Germantown, MD 20874 (301) 251-5154 -. II PREFACE The Urban Initiatives Anti-Crime Demonstration was created by the Public Housing Security Demonstration Act of 1978.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chicago Housing Authority 10
    the ,~ i J. Popkin,Victoria E. Gwiasda,Lynn M. Olson,[_) inis P. Rosenbaum,and LarryBuron FOREWORD BY REBECCA M. BLANK J The Hidden War 1£4/-7~ The Hidden War Crime and the Tragedy of Public Housing in Chicago SUSAN J. POPKIN VICTORIA E. GWIASDA LYNN M. OLSON DENNIS P. ROSENBAUM LARRY BURON .-- IPF~QRERYY ©f~ ~ation~l @iminal Justics Roi~o~c~ 8onii@ (t~¢jR8) Box 6000 Rockville, ~E) 20849o6000 RUTGERS UNIVERSITY PRESS New Brunswick, New Jersey, and London Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The hidden war : crime and the tragedy of public housing in Chicago / Susan J. Popkin... let al.]. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8135-2832-1 (cloth : alk. paper) -- ISBN 0-8135-2833-X (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Chicago Housing Authority. 2. Housing authorities--Illinois-- Chicago. 3. Public housing--Illinois--Chicago. I. Popkin, Susan J. HD7288.78.U52 C44 2000 363.5'85'0977311--dc21 99-056789 British Cataloging-in-Publication data for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2000 by Susan J. Popkin All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the publisher. Please contact Rutgers University Press, 100 Joyce Kilmer Avenue, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8099. The only exception to this prohibition is "fair use" as defined by U.S. copyright law. Manufactured in the United States of America - Contents LIST OF PHOTOS, FIGURES, AND TABLES VII FOREWORD BY REBECCA M.
    [Show full text]
  • EVENT GUIDE SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION: This Section Was Edited and Produced by the Chicago Architecture Foundation
    ARCHITECTUREFREE FESTIVAL This weekend, get FREE, behind-the-scenes access to 200+ buildings across Chicago. openhousechicago.org EVENT GUIDE SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION: This section was edited and produced by the Chicago Architecture Foundation. 2 PRESENTED BY ABOUT THE CHICAGO ARCHITECTURE FOUNDATION Six years ago, the Chicago Architecture Foundation (CAF) launched the first Open House Chicago. This free, citywide festival drew 23,000 people in its first year. By 2016, it grew to 100,000 attendees, making it one of the largest architecture events in the world. This year is our biggest yet, with more than 200 sites. OHC is just one of many CAF programs that inspire people to discover why design matters. Today, when you visit CAF at 224 S. Michigan Ave., you’ll find visitors embarking on tours, FIRST CHURCH OF DELIVERANCE, BRONZEVILLE (p. 15) camps for children, lectures for adults and field trip groups gathered around our 3D model of Chicago. TEN THINGS TO KNOW ABOUT In summer 2018, CAF will open the Chicago Architecture Center at CHICAGO ARCHITECTURE CENTER — OPEN HOUSE CHICAGO (OHC) COMING IN SUMMER 2018 111 E. Wacker Dr. This new location is situated above the dock for the 1. OHC is a FREE public festival with behind-the-scenes access Chicago Architecture Foundation River CAF’s 450 expert volunteer docents to 200+ buildings across Chicago—no tickets required. Cruise aboard Chicago’s First Lady will lead 85+ tours from the Center, Cruises—the city’s top-ranked tour. by boat, bus, L train and on foot for SPECIAL CHICAGO ARCHITECTURE FOUNDATION ADVERTISING SECTION | THURSDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2017 ADVERTISING SECTION | THURSDAY, SPECIAL CHICAGO ARCHITECTURE FOUNDATION 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Polling Places Nov
    City of Chicago PRELIMINARY List of ELECTION DAY Polling Places Nov. 3, 2020 General Election* (All polling place locations are subject to change.) Ward Prec ELECTION DAY Polling Place & Address ("x" indicates that the polling place is not fully accessible.) 1 1 x Yates School 1826 N Francisco Ave 1 2 x Funston School 2010 N Central Park Ave 1 3 x Wells Community Academy 936 N Ashland Ave 1 4 x Commercial Park 1845 W Rice St 1 5 x LaSalle II Magnet School 1148 N Honore St 1 6 x The Ogden Intrnl H S / Chicago 1250 W Erie St 1 7 x Haas Park 2402 N Washtenaw Ave 1 8 x Wicker Park Senior Housing 2020 W Schiller St 1 9 x The Lincoln Lodge 2040 N Milwaukee Ave 1 10 x LaSalle II Magnet School 1148 N Honore St 1 11 Wicker Pk Fieldhouse 1425 N Damen Ave 1 12 Ukranian Village Cultural Ctr 2247 W Chicago Ave 1 13 x Chase School 2021 N Point St 1 14 x De Diego Community Academy 1313 N Claremont Ave 1 15 x De Diego Community Academy 1313 N Claremont Ave 1 16 x Goethe School 2236 N Rockwell St 1 17 x Funston School 2010 N Central Park Ave 1 18 x Create Your Own Space Studio 937 N Western Ave 1 19 x Chase School 2021 N Point St 1 20 x St Sylvester 2915 W Palmer St 1 21 x LaSalle II Magnet School 1148 N Honore St 1 22 x Wright College 1645 N California Ave 1 23 x St Sylvester 2915 W Palmer St 1 24 x Erie Elementary Charter School 1405 N Washtenaw Ave 1 25 x Erie Elementary Charter School 1405 N Washtenaw Ave 1 26 x Funston School 2010 N Central Park Ave 1 27 x The Joinery 2533 W Homer St 1 28 x Windy City Field House 2367 W Logan Bv 1 29 x Bloomingdale
    [Show full text]
  • N:\JOE\RTCP\Interim Progress Report\Links\Report Cover.Tif
    Final Report Submitted to Regional Transportation Authority REGIONAL TRANSIT COORDINATION PLAN: LOCATION STUDY prepared by BOOZ·ALLEN & HAMILTON INC. in association with WELSH PLANNING July 2001 This report is confidential and intended solely for the use and information of the company to whom it is addressed Table of Contents Disclaimer Page.........................................................................................................................1 Section 1 – Project Summary...................................................................................................2 Section 2 – Study Purpose .......................................................................................................5 Section 3 – Background............................................................................................................7 3.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................7 3.2 Assessment of Transit Coordination ...................................................................8 3.2.1 Physical Coordination.............................................................................9 3.2.2 Service Coordination .............................................................................10 3.2.3 Fare Coordination ..................................................................................10 3.2.4 Information Coordination.....................................................................11 3.2.5 Other Themes and Issues......................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 2019-2022 Doormen Agreement.Pub
    FOR ABOMA MEMBER USE ONLY Issued November 2019 Apartment Building Owners and Managers Association of Illinois COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN APARTMENT BUILDING OWNERS AND MANAGERS ASSOCIATION OF ILLINOIS and SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 1 PROPERTY SERVICE DIVISION for the period DECEMBER 1, 2019 THROUGH NOVEMBER 30, 2022 Covering Doorstaff, Receiving Room Employees and Others as defined in Article I INTRODUCTION This booklet is exclusively for the use of ABOMA Members and contains the following: • Pages 1 through 27 Full Collective Bargaining Agreement by and between ABOMA and SEIU Local 1, Property Service Division Covering Doorstaff Receiving Room Employees and Others as defined in Article I for the period of December 1, 2019 through November 30, 2022 • Page 24 Letter of Agreement – Drug and Alcohol Policies • Page 25 Letter of Agreement – Subcontracting • Page 26 and 27 Memorandum of Agreement relating to Sub contracting and sample of Contractor DSMOA SCHEDULE A Pages 1-3 (NIPF) The Buildings (Employers) identified in Schedule A of this Agreement shall contribute for all regular Employees to the SEIU National Industry Pension Fund (hereinafter referred to as the "NIPF") in order to provide retirement benefits for eligible Employees in accordance with the terms of the NIPF. SCHEDULE B Pages 1-3 (401K Pension Savings Plan) The Buildings (Employers) identified in Schedule B of this Agreement shall contribute for all regular employees to the SEIU Local 1 401(k) Savings Plan in order to provide retirement benefits for eligible Employees in accordance with the terms of the 401(k) Plan. SCHEDULE C Page 1 (DSMOA NIPF) The Buildings and sub-contractors (Employers) identified in Schedule C of this Agreement shall contribute for all regular Employees to the SEIU National Industry Pension Fund (hereinafter referred to as the "NIPF") in order to provide retirement benefits for eligible Employees in accordance with the terms of the NIPF.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Housing Authority
    SCATTERED SITES NORTH CENTRAL ALTGELD GARDENS SENIOR HOUSING SOUTH SCATTERED SITES NORTH EAST BRIDGEPORT HOMES SENIOR HOUSING NORTH SCATTERED SITES SOUTH WEST DEARBORN HOMES SENIOR HOUSING CENTRAL SCATTERED SITES WEST SCATTERED SITES SOUTH EAST ICKES HOMES LATHROP HOMES LAWNDALE GARDENS LECLAIRE COURTS EXTENSION LOWDEN HOMES PHILLIP MURRAY HOMES RANDOLPH TOWERS TRUMBULL PARK HOMES WENTWORTH GARDENS LEGENDS SOUTH GRACE ABBOTT HOMES ROBERT H. BROOKS HOMES AND EXTENSION JANE ADDAMS HOMES FRANCIS CABRINI HOMES AND EXTENSIONS WILLIAM GREEN HOMES HENRY HORNER HOMES LAKE MICHIGAN HOMES MADDEN PARK HOMES IDA B. WELLS HOMES AND EXTENSION CLARENCE DARROW HOMES ROBERT TAYLOR HOMES ROCKWELL GARDENS STATEWAY GARDENS WASHINGTON PARK HOMES ROOSEVELT SQUARE DOMAIN LOFTS OLD TOWN VILLAGE EAST RIVER VILLAGE OLD TOWN VILLAGE WEST ORCHARD PARK MOHAWK NORTH RENAISSANCE NORTH MOHAWK INFILL OLD TOWN SQUARE CENTRUM I VILLAGE NORTH RAYMOND M. HILLIARD CENTER WESTHAVEN PARK LAKEFRONT REPLACEMENT HOUSING LAKE PARK CRESCENT HUTCHINSON’S ROW JAZZ ON THE BOULEVARD OAKWOOD SHORES THE LANGSTON QUINCY HOMES MOUNT VERNON ARCHER COURTS THE PERSHING PARK BOULEVARD ST. EDMUND’S MEADOWS PRAIRIE COURTS EXTENSION SOUTH PARK PLAZA DO YOU HAVE A VISION FOR CHANGE? SCATTERED SITES NORTH CENTRAL ALTGELD GARDENS SENIOR HOUSING SOUTH SCATTERED SITES NORTH EAST BRIDGEPORT HOMES SENIOR HOUSING NORTH SCATTERED SITES SOUTH WEST DEABORN HOMES SENIOR HOUSING CENTRAL SCATTERED SITES WEST SCATTERED SITES SOUTH EAST HAROLD ICKES HOMES LATHROP HOMES LAWNDALE GARDENS LECLAIRE COURTS EXTENSION LOWDEN HOMES PHILLIP MURRAY HOMES RANDOLPH TOWERS TRUMBULL PARK HOMES WENTWORTH GARDENS LEGENDS SOUTH GRACE ABBOTT HOMES ROBERT H. BROOKS HOMES AND EXTENSION JANE ADDAMS HOMES FRANCIS CABRINI HOMES AND EXTENSIONS WILLIAM GREEN HOMES HENRY HORNER HOMES LAKE MICHIGAN HOMES MADDEN PARK HOMES IDA B.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Buildings, New Views
    H VoL. 35y d N0. 1 e PublishedPa by ther Hydek Park H istoricalH Society istoWINTErr 2013y 2013 R te WIN Permit No. 85 No. Permit T Chicago, IL Chicago, oor V r 37 6 60 IL Chicago, AID P HS U.S. Postage U.S. 5529 S. Lake Park Avenue Park Lake S. 5529 ANDE V HP Org. Non-Profit Society Historical Park yde H ANCES Fr S o T o H P Tecumseh, Shawnee Indian leader, Del Prado entrance hall ceiling This Newsletter is published by the Hyde Park Historical Society, a old Buildings, Hyde Park Historical Society not-for-profit organization founded CoLLECTINg AND PrESErVINg HyDE PArk’S History in 1975 to record, preserve, and New Views Time for you to join up or renew? promote public interest in the history Fill out the form below and return it to: of Hyde Park. Its headquarters, must have walked by this building a hundred “I times but never once looked in,“ remarked The Hyde Park Historical Society located in an 1893 restored cable car Mindy Schwartz. Such were the sentiments of many 5529 S. Lake Park Avenue • Chicago, IL 60637 station at 5529 S. Lake Park Avenue, of the more than fifty history and architecture buffs touring landmark hotels on Hyde Park’s east side in ✁ houses local exhibits. It is open to late September. Mindy was eying Grecian sculptures Enclosed is my new renewal membership the public on Saturdays and Sundays of faces, pillars, and wall decorations propped against Bob Dalby examines a wall feature in the East Park Tower Hotel in the Hyde Park Historical Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Prioritizing Sidewalk Investment Near Transit Supports a More Accessible Transportation System
    JAN. 15, 2020 PRIORITIZING SIDEWALK INVESTMENT NEAR TRANSIT SUPPORTS A MORE ACCESSIBLE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Key takeaways The new CMAP sidewalk inventory can be used to identify areas where sidewalk additions are most needed in order to improve pedestrian access to transit. Sidewalks can have the biggest impact when they connect transit with existing amenities and in areas with significant population or employment. In all six counties, communities have the opportunity to improve sidewalks near Metra stations. On the CTA system, the greatest impact can be achieved through targeted and prioritized investment near rail stations with high job density and where existing infrastructure caters to vehicles rather than pedestrians. Executive Summary Sidewalk inventory supports data driven investment decisions CMAP’s regional sidewalk inventory offers the first opportunity to comprehensively analyze sidewalk availability near transit in northeastern Illinois. Making transit more competitive is a key recommendation in the region’s long- range plan, ON TO 2050. Increasing transit ridership improves air quality by reducing the number of vehicles on the road, reduces highway congestion, and connects people to jobs, education, entertainment, and other amenities. In addition, public transit access is especially crucial for those who cannot drive or do not have access to a car. Ensuring that riders can safely access bus stops and trains stations on foot is a critical way the region can make transit safer and more competitive with other modes. Chicago
    [Show full text]