DOCSLIB.ORG

Notice of Meeting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Notice of Meeting Board of Adjustment Pembroke Pines, FL January 3, 2013 The regular meeting of the BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT was called to order by Chairman Ryan on Thursday, January 3, 2013 at 6:30 P.M., in the City Commission Chambers, Pembroke Pines Municipal Center, 10100 Pines Boulevard, Pembroke Pines, Florida. Present to wit: Chairman Ryan, Members Hendry, Goggin, and Monroig, and Alternate Member Amps Absent: Vice Chairman Rodriguez-Soto, Also Present: Assistant City Attorney Stacy Weinger, Dean Piper, Zoning Administrator, and Board Secretary Katherine Borgstrom. Board Secretary declared a quorum present. LEGAL INSTRUCTION: Assistant City Attorney Stacy Weinger explained the hearing process to the audience and applicants. The hearing is quasi judicial and all testimony taken is under oath. The Board has the right to ask witnesses questions that the Board deems relevant to the application. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Board will consider testimony and evidence and enter an order. Three votes are needed to approve a variance. The decisions are appealable to the City Commission of Pembroke Pines only. [Board Secretary’s Note: Interested parties were sworn under oath to give testimony in the relevant causes by Board Secretary.] APPROVAL OF MINUTES On a motion by Member Goggin, seconded by Member Hendry, to approve the minutes of the October 4, 2012 meeting as received, the following vote was recorded: AYE: Chairman Ryan, Members Hendry, Goggin, and Monroig, Alternate Member Amps NAY: None Motion Passed NEW BUSINESS: VARIANCES: Board of Adjustment January 3, 2013 Page 1 VARIANCE FILE NUMBER: ZV 2012-38 PETITIONER: Tracey Meredith ADDRESS: 7690 NW 16 Court Pembroke Pines, FL 33024 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 7690 NW 16 Court Pembroke Pines, FL 33024 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 10, Block 8 of the BOULEVARD HEIGHTS SECTION EIGHT Plat as recorded in Plat Book 57, Page 9 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida. VARIANCE REQUESTED: Petitioner is requesting variances to allow: ZV 2012-38 (A) two accessory structures instead of the allowed one accessory structure; (B) a 360 square foot storage shed instead of the allowed 100 square foot storage shed; (C) a 200 square foot tiki hut instead of the allowed 100 square foot tiki hut; (D) a 0 foot side (west) yard setback instead of the required five (5) foot side yard setback for a storage shed; (E) a 0 foot rear yard setback instead of the required five (5) foot rear yard setback for a storage shed; (F) a 0 foot side (east) yard setback instead of the required five (5) foot side yard setback for a tiki hut; (G) a 0 foot side (east) yard setback instead of the required five (5) foot side yard setback for a deck; (H) a 0 foot side (east) yard setback instead of the required five (5) foot side yard setback for pavers; (I) a 0 foot side (west) yard setback instead of the required five (5) foot side yard setback for pavers; (J) a 0 foot rear yard setback instead of the required five (5) foot rear yard setback for pavers; and (K) 45% lot coverage for primary and accessory structures instead of the allowed 40% lot coverage for primary and accessory structures. REFERENCES: ZV 2012-38 (A – J) § 155.049 ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES; SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR CERTAIN SCREENED ENCLOSURES WITH COVERED ROOFS. (B) In residential districts, all accessory buildings and uses in a rear yard shall be located at least five feet from any plot line, at least 15 feet from any street line, and at least ten feet from any main building or other accessory building. For water front lots located within developments approved under the design criteria of (RS-7) single family zoning districts, accessory structures shall be allowed to extend to the zero setback side property line. These accessory structures shall include, but not be limited to, concrete slabs, paver decks, wood decks, pools and pool decks, and screen enclosures. (H) In all residential districts except A-1, RR, E-1, R-3, R-4, and R-6, only one accessory building is permitted which shall not exceed 100 square feet. In the A-1, RR, E-1, R-3, R-4, and R-6 districts, all accessory uses, storage sheds, and accessory buildings, except structures for housing livestock, up to 150 square feet in area shall be located at least five feet from any plot line and at least 15 feet from any street line. Also in the A-1, RR, E-1, R-3, R-4 and R-6 districts, only one storage container shall be permitted. Storage sheds and accessory buildings over 150 square feet and storage containers shall be Board of Adjustment January 3, 2013 Page 2 subject to the limitations on location of a principal building and shall not be placed in any required yard. For purposes of this section, fall-out shelters and garages shall not be deemed accessory buildings. ZV 2012-38 (K) § 155.106(C) ONE FAMILY DWELLING (R-1A THROUGH R-1C) DISTRICTS. (C) Coverage. The combined area occupied by all principal and accessory buildings shall not exceed 40% of the area of the plot. ('69 Code, App. A § 18.3) Tracey Meredith Petitioner spoke to the request. Petitioner stated she had received permission in 1988 through variance request to build a shed that was 12 x 12. She stated it was built by and permits pulled by Ted’s Sheds, and that the company is now out of business. A search for the permit and variance approval by the City did not find the paperwork. In 1999 the tiki hut put in by Seminoles. Petitioner did not get permit for building for tiki hut. Petitioner stated the pavers were already in when the home was purchased. Because of code violation for the rebuilding of the shed, which had been enlarged while rebuilding it, she requested a magistrate’s meeting but there was no ruling. Petitioner was told to seek variance through Board of Adjustment. Dean Piper stated that the permit would be considered void because the repairs were actually replacement of walls and enlarged the structure, even if the permit could be found. Petitioner had neighbors sign letter saying they have no objection to the shed and the neighbors on both sides are the same families that lived in the homes in 1988. Petitioner stated she stores medical equipment in sheds and has the paved yard because her mother, who also lives in the home, cannot walk on grass, thus this enables the mother to enjoy the entire backyard. Board members who spoke to the request were Chairman Ryan, Members Monroig, Goggin, Hendry, and Amps. Concerns focused on the fact that the rear yard has no drainage for rain water. Dean Piper stated the set back measurements were not available at time of advertising so Zero was used, but most are two and a half feet to three and a half feet. Members also had concerns that this is the most built up home in the neighborhood, questioned if property appraisal meets the same square footage of the building and with there being no HOA in Boulevard Heights that would put the property under the City’s ordinances and Petitioner is extensively over the City ordinance regulations. Dean Piper did state that the addition for the mother was permitted and that all the utilities on the property run Board of Adjustment January 3, 2013 Page 3 in the front yard only, with none in the backyard. Petitioner stated she did not believe she would be able to remove any of the sheds or pavers, as she believes she needs them for the comfort and wellbeing of her mother. No one from the audience addressed the variance request. On a motion by Member Hendry, seconded by Member Goggin, to defer the request to the February 7, 2013 meeting when Petitioner can provide exact setback measurements to the board, the following vote was recorded: AYE: Chairman Ryan, Members Hendry, Goggin, and Monroig, Alternate Member Amps NAY: None Motion Passed VARIANCE FILE NUMBER: ZV 2012-39 PETITIONER: John Zigler ADDRESS: 18885 NW 24 Court Pembroke Pines, FL 33029 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 18885 NW 24 Court Pembroke Pines, FL 33029 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Tract “A” of Big Sky Plat as recorded in Plat Book 158, Page 11 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida. AKA Lot 461 Keystone Lakes VARIANCE REQUESTED: Petitioner is requesting variances to allow: A) a 0 foot side (east) yard setback instead of the required five (5) foot side yard setback for a paver pool deck B) a 0 foot side (east) yard setback instead of the required five (5) foot side yard setback for a roofed patio. REFERENCE: Big Sky Planned Unit Development (PUD) Guidelines Petitioner John Ziegler spoke to the request. Petitioner stated the patio deck and roof have not been built yet. Petitioner is seeking to enlarge the porch to utilize full use of it and that it is attached to Board of Adjustment January 3, 2013 Page 4 the house. Petitioner stated the neighbor has signed letter of no objection and the HOA has granted approval. Board Members who spoke to the request were Chairman Ryan, Members Goggin and Hendry. Concerns focused on if the pavers, which are in sand, would be level to house, to which the Petitioner replied they will not be and that the room is not intended to be enclosed. Petitioner also stated the roof will match the existing roof – color and tile, and it will go over the pool. No members of the public came forward to speak to the variance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wyncote, Pennsylvania: the History, Development, Architecture and Preservation of a Victorian Philadelphia Suburb
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 1985 Wyncote, Pennsylvania: The History, Development, Architecture and Preservation of a Victorian Philadelphia Suburb Doreen L. Foust University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Foust, Doreen L., "Wyncote, Pennsylvania: The History, Development, Architecture and Preservation of a Victorian Philadelphia Suburb" (1985). Theses (Historic Preservation). 239. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/239 Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Foust, Doreen L. (1985). Wyncote, Pennsylvania: The History, Development, Architecture and Preservation of a Victorian Philadelphia Suburb. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/239 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wyncote, Pennsylvania: The History, Development, Architecture and Preservation of a Victorian Philadelphia Suburb Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Foust, Doreen L. (1985). Wyncote, Pennsylvania: The History, Development, Architecture and
    [Show full text]
  • Cabins, Cottages, Pole Barns, Sheds, Outbuildings & More SHELDON
    Cabins, Cottages, Pole Barns, Sheds, Outbuildings & More Spring - 2009 Copyright 2008 - Andrew Sheldon 8'-0" 8'-0" Plan #GH101 - 8' x 8' Greenhouse or Shed - $19 This little greenhouse is constructed on pressure treated skids making it mobile and in many communities it will be considered a temporary structure. It is constructed of 2x4's obtainable at any lumber yard. The roof glazing is a single sheet of acrylic, or if you prefer, the roof glass can be eliminated and the building used as a shed. A 2ft module makes the design easily expandable if the 8ft length does not fit your needs. A material list is included in the drawing. Additional or Reverse sets are $15.00 SHELDON DESIGNS, INC. Order by Phone: 800-572-5934 or by Fax: 609-683-5976 Page 1 Welcome ! My name is Andy Sheldon. I am an architect and have been designing small houses and farm buildings for over 25 years. My mission at SHELDON DESIGNS is to provide you with beautiful, economical, easy-to-build designs with complete blueprints at reasonable prices. This catalog contains some of my favorite small buildings. Each design that I offer specifies standard build- ing materials readily available at any lumber yard. When we receive your order, we will make every effort to pro- cess and ship within forty-eight hours. You should receive your detailed blueprints in approximately seven to ten days and your credit card will not be charged nor your check deposited until your plans are shipped. Your satisfaction is our highest priority. If you are dissatisfied in any way, you may return the order within 30 days for a full refund or exchange the plans for another de- sign.
    [Show full text]
  • Digging Into a Dugout House (Site 21Sw17): the Archaeology of Norwegian Immigrant Anna Byberg Christopherson Goulson, Swenoda Township, Swift County, Minnesota
    DIGGING INTO A DUGOUT HOUSE (SITE 21SW17): THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF NORWEGIAN IMMIGRANT ANNA BYBERG CHRISTOPHERSON GOULSON, SWENODA TOWNSHIP, SWIFT COUNTY, MINNESOTA \\|// \\|// \\|// \\|// TR1 North \\|// \\|// II \\|// |// \\ I IV |// | \\ VI \ // \\|// | TR2 North \\ // / Root \\|// \\|/ IVa \\|// II \\| / // \\|/ III I |// \\| \\ III VII Roots // XI \\|/ \|// XI XII / \ V IX VIII VIII VIII \\|// TU1 North \\|// IV \ \\|// \|// \\|// X V | \\|// XIII \\|/ \\|// \\ // VI III / \\|// \\|// \\|// \\|/ | \\|// VII / \\|// \\ // VIII I XIV IX III XI XII XV IV XVa II X IV Roots XVI III II VI VI V University of Kentucky Program for Archaeological Research Department of Anthropology Technical Report No. 480 May 2003 DIGGING INTO A DUGOUT HOUSE (SITE 21SW17): THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF NORWEGIAN IMMIGRANT ANNA BYBERG CHRISTOPHERSON GOULSON, SWENODA TOWNSHIP, SWIFT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Author: Donald W. Linebaugh, Ph.D., R.P.A. With Contributions by: Hilton Goulson, Ph.D. Tanya M. Peres, Ph.D., R.P.A. Renee M. Bonzani, Ph.D. Report Prepared by: Program for Archaeological Research Department of Anthropology University of Kentucky 1020A Export Street Lexington, Kentucky 40506-9854 Phone: (859) 257-1944 Fax: (859) 323-1968 www.uky.edu/as/anthropology/PAR Technical Report No. 480 ________________________________________ Donald W. Linebaugh, Ph.D., R.P.A. Principal Investigator May 15, 2003 i ABSTRACT This report presents the results of excavations on the dugout house site (21SW17) of Anna Byberg Christopherson Goulson in west-central Minnesota. The work was completed by Dr. Donald W. Linebaugh of the University of Kentucky and a group of family volunteers between June 6 and 12, 2002. Anna and Lars Christopherson reportedly moved into their dugout house ca. 1868. Lars and two of the five Christopherson children died of scarlet fever ca.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Note
    A Historical Note We have included the information on this page to show you the original procedure that the Sioux used to determine the proper tripod pole measurements. If you have a tipi and do not know what size it is (or if you lose this set up booklet) you would use the method explained on this page to find your exact tripod pole lengths. It is simple and it works every time. We include this page only as an interesting historical reference. You will not need to follow the instructions on this page. The complete instructions that you will follow to set up your Nomadics tipi begin on page 4. All the measurements you will need are already figured out for you starting on page 5. -4”- In order to establish the proper position and length for the door pole, start at A and walk around the edge of the tipi cover to point B. Walk toe-to-heel one foot in front of the other and count your steps from A to B. Let us say for instance that you count 30 steps from A to B. Simply divide 30 by 1/3. This gives you 10. That means that you start again at A and walk toe-to- heel around the edge of the tipi cover 10 steps, going towards B again. Stop at 10 steps and place the end of the door pole (D) at that point on the edge of the tipi cover. Your three tripod poles should now look like the drawing above. The north and south poles going side by side down the middle of the tipi cover, the door pole placed 1/3 of the way from A to B, and the door pole crossing the north and south poles at Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuolumne Meadows Historic District Yosemite National Park
    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 2007 Tuolumne Meadows Historic District Yosemite National Park Tuolumne Meadows Historic District Yosemite National Park Table of Contents Descriptive Information Part 1 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 3 Park Information .............................................................................................................................. 5 Property Level and CLI Number ..................................................................................................... 5 Inventory Summary ......................................................................................................................... 5 Landscape Description .................................................................................................................... 6 CLI Hierarchy Description .............................................................................................................. 7 Location Map .................................................................................................................................. 7 Boundary Description ...................................................................................................................... 8 Regional Context ........................................................................................................................... 10 Site Plans ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Rural Vernacular Habitat, a Heritage in Our Landscape
    FFuturopauturopa For a new vision of landscape and territory A Council of Europe Magazine no 1 / 2008 – English Landscape Territory Nature The rural vernacular habitat, Culture Heritage a heritage Human beings in our landscape Society Sustainable development Ethics Aesthetic Inhabitants Perception Inspiration Genius loci kg712953_Futuropa.indd 1 25/03/08 15:46:52 n o 1 – 2008 Chief Editors Robert Palmer Director of Culture and Cultural and FFuturopauturopa Natural Heritage of the Council of Europe Daniel Thérond Deputy Director of Culture and Cultural and Natural Heritage of the Council of Europe Editorial Director of publication Maguelonne Dejeant-Pons Gabriella Battani-Dragoni ..............................................................................3 Head of the Cultural Heritage, Landscape and Spatial Planning Presentation Division of the Council of Europe The vernacular rural heritage: from the past to the future With the cooperation of Alison Cardwell, Adminstrator, Franco Sangiorgi ..............................................................................................4 Cultural Heritage, Landscape and Spatial Planning Division Pascale Doré, Assistant, Cultural Rural Vernacular Heritage and Landscape in Europe Heritage, Landscape and Spatial Farms and landscape of the Netherlands: rural vernacular architecture Planning Division of the Low Countries Ellen Van Olst ...........................................................6 Concept and editing Barbara Howes The industrial architecture of the Llobregat valleys in Spain:
    [Show full text]
  • Vernacular Architecture in Michigan's Upper Peninsula
    Making Something Out of Nothing: Vernacular Architecture in Michigan's Upper Peninsula by Mary Hoefferle Scholars studying the Upper Midwest have described many characteristics of cultural life in Michigan's Upper Peninsula, including the region's foodways (Lockwood, 1991; Magnaghi, 1997), ethnic heritage (Loukinen, 1997), relationship between the Yooper dialect and identity (Remlinger, 2006, 2007), traditions of joke and storytelling (Dorson, 1952; Leary, 1991; 2001), and festival art (Hoefferle, 2009). They and other writers (Frimodig, 1983; Zechlin, 2004) generally characterize Yoopers as resourceful, independent, modest, proud people who often use self-parody to laugh at themselves and “to acknowledge who they are and who they are not” (Leary, 2001, p. 248). However, no one has examined how these and other cultural traits materialize in the U. P.'s vernacular architecture, specifically in its shacks and seasonal housing. Therefore, very few people outside the region know about the biographies of the shack builders, their construction processes, their motivations for shack production, the shack's distinct aesthetic qualities, or the social functions hosted in these humble dwellings. Although humble, vernacular architecture merits serious study and has earned at least one serious definition: Brunskill defines vernacular architecture as “a building designed by an amateur without any training in design; the individual will have been guided by a series of conventions built up in his locality, paying little attention to what may be fashionable. The function of the building would be the dominant factor, aesthetic considerations, though present to some small degree, being quite minimal. Local materials would be used as a matter of course, other materials being chosen and imported quite exceptionally” (Brunskill, 2000, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Minam-Lodge.Com Updated 11/09/2018
    BGA Iron pin with cap 45Ā21'19.9967"N 45Ā21'20.0302"N 117Ā38'05.7103"W 3d 3610.7 ft. ii 117Ā38'01.1821"W 3574.0 ft. 1a 254 Fnd BGA 5/8 w/cap 1"W 7a ii MINAM CISTERN RIVER SHED WATER LEVEL 3681.8 SABAI BGA Iron pin with cap GRAND CABIN 45Ā21'16.9405"N 253 117Ā38'01.0588"W BGA Iron pin with cap Fnd BGA 5/8 w/cap Searched for, 45Ā21'16.8023"N 3575.7 ft. not found 280 250 117Ā38'14.6696"W 115 Fnd Iron Pin w/cap 1"W APPROX CORNER 3650.8 ft. SHED TRAIL TO LAND RANCH SAWMILL 4e 115 vi 2"W 3608.573 SHED Control Point loc. tbd 112 3634.080 114 2"W 111 Control Point 3639.180 Control Point 114 3620.525 112 113 Control Point WOOD 111 1"W 113 SHED 3632.106 Control Point BURN 110 PILE 3640.486 Control Point 4e 2"W 4e iii vi 110 HOT TUB loc. tbd 108 3633.939 Control Point TIPI 108 TENT 107 TIPI 3638.874 109 Control Point 107 3625.719 HOT TUB WASHROOM Control Point 100 ASTER 3620.020 102 Control Point 3635.769 WALL TENT 109 TIPI AIR STRIP ControlYARROW Point 102 Not searched for Not searched for WALLTENT TENT 4e 101 3592.192 v Control Point FF 2631.0M CABIN M 100 103 WASHROOM103 3633.937 101 Control Point CABIN MASSAGE TENT BATHROOM & FF 2630.6 2 SHOWER MM HORSE PADDOCK LODGE FF 2629.84e104 FF 2622.8 v3624.771 LUPINE 104 Control Point 8 PAINTBRUSH WALL TENT M MM FF 2628.4 M ATTACHED CABIN CABIN X 105 3627.482 GARDEN 106BENCHMARK X 106 3636.0513635.79 Control Point NETTLE BGA Iron pin with cap 5994 X Not searched for 1606 Control Point CABINFnd BGA 5/8 w/cap ATTACHED CABIN 45Ā21'07.3313"N Fnd BGA 5/8 w/cap MM APPROX COORD 117Ā38'14.3677"W BGA Iron pin with cap FF 2633.9 45Ā21'07.6"N 3733.7 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Other Building Codes
    Other Other Other Building Building Building Other - Codes Other - Building Code Description Codes Other - Building Code Description Codes Building Code Description AL1 1S LEAN TO RS1 FR/BR UT SHED PA3 PATIO/POOL APRON AH1 1SF POULTRY HS RG2 GARAGE FIN FR DETACHED PA4 PATIO/SLAB (RAISED) RA1 ATT FR GR RG4 GARAGE FIN MAS DETACHED PC3 PAVING CONC MAT/S BT0 AUTO TELLER MACHINE RG5 GARAGE UF BL/CON DETACHED PC1 PAVING CONC-AVG AB1 BANK BARN RG1 GARAGE UF FR DETACHED PC2 PAVING CONC-HEAVY BC1 BANK CANOPY-DRIVE RG3 GARAGE UF MAS DETACHED PA2 PAVING-ASP/CONC-S BT2 BATH HOUSE RG9 GARAGE/APT FIN FR PA1 PAVING-ASPHALT PA BD1 BOAT DOCK (WOOD T RG7 GARAGE/APT UF FR PB1 PLUMBING FIXTURES BH2 BOAT HOUSE ENCLOS RG8 GARAGE/APT UF MAS AO1 POT STRG UNDGD BS2 BOAT SLIP AVERAGE GT1 GATE HOUSE RP2 PREFAB PL BS1 BOAT SLIP ECONOMY GZ1 GAZEBO AX1 PREFAB STL BLD BH1 BOATHOUSE OPEN GH2 GHOUSE PIPE METAL AQ1 QUONSET HUT BRW BRICK WALL GH3 GHOUSE PLAS FRAME TR1 RESTRM STR/FRM-CB BK1 BULKHEAD/RET.WALL GH1 GHOUSE WD FRAME SH2 SHED ALUMINUM AK1 BUNKER SILO GC4 GOLF COURSE-AV SH3 SHED FINISHED MET CB1 CABIN WITH PLUMBING GC5 GOLF COURSE-FR SH1 SHED MACHINERY-FR CB2 CABIN WITHOUT PLUMBING GC3 GOLF COURSE-GD SH4 SHED QUONSET RC2 CANOPY GC6 GOLF COURSE-PAR 3 AS5 SILO-PREFAB CP5 CANOPY ONLY RP5 GUNITE PL AB3 STABLE CP8 CANOPY RF-AVERAGE RD3 HEAVY DOC AG1 STL GRN BIN ND CP7 CANOPY RF-ECONOMY LT4 LGHT INCN-POLE & ST1 STUDIO CP9 CANOPY RF-GOOD LT2 LGHT INC-WL-MTD-F ST2 STUDIO W/FAC CP6 CANOPY ROOF/SLAB LT5 LGHT MER-POLE & B SC1 SWIMMING POOL-COM RC1 CARPORT RD1 LIGHT DOC AW2 SWINE CONFIN B CD1 COMMERCIAL WOOD DECK LD1 LOADING DOCK -CONC OR STL AV1 SWINE FARROW B RP3 CONC POOL SH5 LUMB SHED 2SIDE O TN1 TANK - ELEVATED STEEL AS1 CONC SILO W RF SH6 LUMB SHED 4SIDE O TC1 TENNIS AS CBW CONCRETE BLK WALL MH3 M.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Handy Home Avondale 10X8 Wood Storage Shed W/ Floor Manual
    16587-GEN STOP! Call Us First! DO NOT RETURN TO STORE. For immediate help with assembly or product information call our toll free number: 1-888-827-9056 or email: [email protected] Our staff is ready to provide assistance April through October M-F 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM EST Saturday 8:30 AM to 4:30 PM EST November through March M - F 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM EST (This page intentionally left blank.) 16587-GEN 02/13/2019 Backyard Products, LLC 1000 Ternes Drive ASSEMBLY MANUAL Monroe, MI 48162 GABLE 10' x 8' (305 x 244 cm) ACTUAL FLOOR SIZE IS 116-1/2 x 96" (295,9 x 243,8 cm) KEEP THIS MANUAL FOR FUTURE REFERENCE IMPORTANT! READ INSTRUCTIONS THOROUGHLY PRIOR TO BEGINNING ASSEMBLY. BEFORE YOU BEGIN • BUILDING RESTRICTIONS AND APPROVALS Be sure to check local building department and homeowners association for specific restrictions and/ or requirements before building. • ENGINEERED DRAWINGS Contact our Customer Service Team if engineered drawings are needed to pull local permits. • SURFACE PREPARATION To ensure proper assembly you must build your shed on a level surface. Recommended methods and materials to level your shed are listed on page 9. • CHECK ALL PARTS Inventory all parts listed on pages 4-6. Contact our Customer Service Team if any parts are missing or damaged. • ADDITIONAL MATERIALS You will need additional materials to complete your shed. See page 3 for required and optional materials and quantities. - CUSTOMER SERVICE - Call: 1-888-827-9056 email: [email protected] TOOLS Required Optional K K Phillips Chalk Line K Tool Belt/ Screwdriver Nail Pouch K Drill / Driver K Utility Knife K K K 3/8" Drill Bit Shingle Safety Glasses Blades K #2 Philips Drive Bit K Hammer K Caulk Gun K Nail Gun • Gun Nails K Pencil K Exterior rated Wood Glue K Gloves K Tape Measure K K Square or Ladder K Clamps K Level K Paint Tools Safety! Always use approved safety glasses during assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Shed Or Gazebo Permit
    United Lost Lake Property Owners Association 903 Missouri Drive, Dixon IL 61021 | 815-652-4491 | FAX: 815-652-8664 | [email protected] Shed or Gazebo Permit Purpose: Permit for a shed or gazebo. Fee: $150.00 (completely refundable upon successful completion of construction and final ACC/ECC inspection). NOTE: There is an automatic $250.00 fine for failure to obtain an ACC/ECC permit prior to construction. Processing: ULLPOA Board approval required if shed or gazebo is to be constructed on an adjacent lot to a house lot, and/or if the shed or gazebo is a used structure. Allow 30 days for review process to complete. Please fill in the following information completely. Please print legibly. Section ________________________ Lot Number(s)_____________ Property Owner’s Name ______________________________________ Property Address _____________________________________________________ Home Phone ____________________ Cell Phone ______________________ Email ________________________ Shed/Gazebo Dimensions: ____________________ Setbacks Front (*) ________ Back (*) ________ (*) Left_______ (*) Right_________ * Sheds and gazebos are not considered a “Dwelling House or Structure”, and therefore are not subject to the setback requirements outlined in Section 2(B)(b) of our Covenants. The Ogle County setback requirements for sheds and gazebos are the same as this permit and are considered as acceptable minimums. Please read and understand this checklist: Setbacks are to be in accordance with Ogle County and ULLPOA requirements. Submit one plot plan to scale. Provide a copy of the Ogle County permit. In no event shall any shed or gazebo ever be used as a residence or dwelling house or place for human occupancy or habitation, either temporary or permanent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cathedral and the Bicycle Shed
    83RDACSA ANNUAL MEETING HISTORY/THEORYICRITIClSM 1995 121 The Cathedral and the Bicycle Shed HOWARD DAVIS University of Oregon I believe that the call for papers to this session is intended to tion is not only hard to make, but in fact may prevent the help bring the understanding of vernacular architecture into development of important understandings about the nature the mainstream of architectural thought. The need to do this ofthe built world, understandings about how it gets built, and arises because of an attitude that is exemplified by Pevsner's what the implications of such understandings might be for famous statement at the beginning ofAn Outline ofEuropean practice. Architecture. This sentence-"A bicycle shed is a building; These overlaps and continuities happen in various ways. Lincoln Cathedral is a piece of architecture" - is representa- There are continuities of type, in which buildings share tive of an intellectual tradition that until very recently has characteristics of organization, style or construction. These divided the world of building into two quite separate parts. come about because there are also continuities ofprocess, in which buildings that are architecture, and buildings that are "Architecture" has included buildings that have been just buildings, are all done within a building world that is built by ruling elites, important civic and institutional itself continuous, in which most of the various players - buildings, buildings that have been built to last, and craftsmen, building inspectors, architects, masons-do not primarily, buildings built for explicitly religious or themselves make the same distinction that Pevsner did. spiritual reasons. It also includes buildings that have And buildings are complex enough that different parts of been able to demonstrate a good deal of architectural them may have come about in different ways, or that innovation, that can usually be attributed to particular different aspects of them are understood in different ways.
    [Show full text]