Broad Exchange Building 25 Broad Street Facade and Window Restoration New York, New York

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Broad Exchange Building 25 Broad Street Facade and Window Restoration New York, New York When it was completed in 1902, the Broad Exchange Building was the largest office building in America, with the highest estimated real estate value in Manhattan. De- signed by the architectural firm Clinton & Russell, the Financial District landmark is a tripartite composition, with a three-story granite base, a fourteen-story shaft of brick with terra cotta trim, and a three-story capital of terra cotta, with a copper cornice. At the heart of the Manhattan Financial District, 25 Broad is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and has been desig- nated a New York City Landmark. In 1997, office space was converted into condominiums, with the residential portion of the building thereafter referred to as “the Ex- change at 25 Broad.” Hoffmann Architects’ involvement with the Broad Ex- change Building began with a facade investigation pursu- ant to New York City Local Law 11 of 1998. Our architects prepared and filed a report with the Department of Buildings and developed a scope of work for emer- gency stabilization. Over the years, some of the building’s characteristic architectural features had either deteriorated or been removed deliberately, altering the appearance of the facade and roofline. Previous efforts to address deterioration at 25 Broad used materials that were incompatible with the existing structure and, often, did not match the aesthetic qualities of the original building. An initial investigation revealed severe deterioration of the existing terra cotta. Using photographic documentation found in archives, Hoffmann Architects designed replicas of lost elements, restoring the decorative features and profile of the building as it first appeared in 1902. The restoration design remediated faulty repairs and corrected poor workmanship and incorrect material selection, resolving building envelope distress while meet- ing stringent guidelines for the treatment of historic properties. The comprehensive facade restoration included repair of damaged granite, terra cotta, limestone, and brick; masonry reconstruction; copper cornice repairs; parapet reconstruction; lintel rebuilding; restoration of reinforcing steel elements; mortar joint repointing; sealant system replacement; wood window restoration; cast iron spandrel panel and pier restoration; and facade cleaning. Facade repairs were designed not only to address the water-tightness and stability of the building, but also to restore the aesthetic of the original design. Sensitive restoration of the historic structure was critical to preserving the rich architectural tapestry of one of the most prominent financial centers of the world. Given this challenge, the project team was committed to achieving restoration that not only protected against the effects of deterioration and stress, but which also resurrected original design elements that had been lost over time. Hoffmann Architects Specialists in the Rehabilitation of Building Exteriors.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Bowery - Houston - Bleecker Transportation Study (Congestion Analysis)
Bowery - Houston - Bleecker Transportation Study (Congestion Analysis) Technical Memorandum No. 1 - Existing Conditions P.I.N. PTDT11D00.H07 DRAFT December 2011 Bowery – Houston - Bleecker Transportation Study Technical Memorandum No. 1 Existing Conditions PTDT11D00.H07 The preparation of this report has been financed in part through funds from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (FTA) through the New York State Department of transportation and the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council. This document is disseminated by the New York City of transportation in the interest of information exchange. It reflects the views of the New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT) which is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented. The report does not necessarily reflect any official views or policies of the Federal Transit Administration, the federal Highway Administration or the State of New York. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. Prepared by: New York City Department of Transportation Janette Sadik-Khan, Commissioner Lori Ardito, First Deputy Commissioner Gerard Soffian, Deputy Commissioner Ryan Russo, Assistant Commissioner Margaret Forgione, Manhattan Borough Commissioner Naim Rasheed, Project Director Michael Griffith, Deputy Project Director Harvey LaReau, Project Manager Hilary Gietz, Principal Administrative Assistant Joe Li, City Planner Ali Jafri, Highway Transportation Specialist Milorad Ubiparip, Highway Transportation Specialist Eva Marin, Highway Transportation Specialist Table of Contents S.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY S.1 Introduction S.2 Demographics S.3 Zoning and Land Use S.4 Traffic and Transportation S.5 Public Transportation S.6 Parking S.7 Pedestrians and Bicycles S.8 Accidents/Safety S.9 Goods Movements S.10 Public Participation 1.
[Show full text]
DR.'Kikblill, 68 BOWERY, Cornfr CANAL ST
overseer of of FOR HAIiK. AMUKEMKNTS. AMriHK«KNTH. AMDHKMKNTH. AJIUMKMENW. jity s, Wiluam Whitley, poor Jursey ; _ litar, aged N yearn. englishman run TilEATRE. HOAHtt AV THBATRB. rpHEATRE OOM1QUB. GARDEN Ttie relatives und friends of tlie lamtlv, the meal¬ hah balk a new and to I WHITE A SPKNCEK I.'Mat amiI JABBETT A I'ALkKS Anusei ul invention, which una lately been in this BROUGHAM'STwenty fourth street, net! door to Kifth Aveeu« Hotel. B ADMISSION CBNTI. M ...Proprietors N'IKIiOK M;.n»:?w» O. 1'. of of patente1 « .(*!... Mr. W If. lilMu iKI) I.in *1 d I'. M ier* of ttic (. ruiKi Lod^e I. U. the State which there la anet on the manufactureof Uiwi! nod *...Mr. JOHN It Is with eitrriiw n-atlftuatioa that tlirwigh the courtesy of Uuiutv II open 7 'a begin* the veterans of the war of 1813 are fOanUjNOO profit ilaiibxcr Me».in. HaiteU A M. of Km KrauCMc'j, ami the TUI{ GREAT HIT OK THE SEASON. ENORMOUS HOUSES. COMPLETE HOCOBAfc Kew York and lM) to 2W per cent. The article bus met with gieut furor HUj;« Man iter lame* Brhnubarg. Gtlllough, OK THK MA'HC LYI.E uf tUa invited to attend the funeral, from Trin¬ amongst (he and of md ou the IPRONOIINCKD SUCCK8S. klrj inns* of Mile. Sm, Ui delaying their own «agli(«tne<il oue PLUTO, iMoiul i»aak of tiift tirunpbant ancagKUlMil respectfully aristocracy gentiy England week, tUe loaniuuineat m ambled to pluto 1-L.UTO njrvu. LYDIa THOMPSON ity M K. church, York street, Jersey City, this (Sun¬ Continent, and without do11 bt only requires to be well can NKW COMEDY, prsneul plutO.
[Show full text]
Manhattan Year BA-NY H&R Original Purchaser Sold Address(Es)
Manhattan Year BA-NY H&R Original Purchaser Sold Address(es) Location Remains UN Plaza Hotel (Park Hyatt) 1981 1 UN Plaza Manhattan N Reader's Digest 1981 28 West 23rd Street Manhattan Y NYC Dept of General Services 1981 NYC West Manhattan * Summit Hotel 1981 51 & LEX Manhattan N Schieffelin and Company 1981 2 Park Avenue Manhattan Y Ernst and Company 1981 1 Battery Park Plaza Manhattan Y Reeves Brothers, Inc. 1981 104 W 40th Street Manhattan Y Alpine Hotel 1981 NYC West Manhattan * Care 1982 660 1st Ave. Manhattan Y Brooks Brothers 1982 1120 Ave of Amer. Manhattan Y Care 1982 660 1st Ave. Manhattan Y Sanwa Bank 1982 220 Park Avenue Manhattan Y City Miday Club 1982 140 Broadway Manhattan Y Royal Business Machines 1982 Manhattan Manhattan * Billboard Publications 1982 1515 Broadway Manhattan Y U.N. Development Program 1982 1 United Nations Plaza Manhattan N Population Council 1982 1 Dag Hammarskjold Plaza Manhattan Y Park Lane Hotel 1983 36 Central Park South Manhattan Y U.S. Trust Company 1983 770 Broadway Manhattan Y Ford Foundation 1983 320 43rd Street Manhattan Y The Shoreham 1983 33 W 52nd Street Manhattan Y MacMillen & Co 1983 Manhattan Manhattan * Solomon R Gugenheim 1983 1071 5th Avenue Manhattan * Museum American Bell (ATTIS) 1983 1 Penn Plaza, 2nd Floor Manhattan Y NYC Office of Prosecution 1983 80 Center Street, 6th Floor Manhattan Y Mc Hugh, Leonard & O'Connor 1983 Manhattan Manhattan * Keene Corporation 1983 757 3rd Avenue Manhattan Y Melhado, Flynn & Assocs. 1983 530 5th Avenue Manhattan Y Argentine Consulate 1983 12 W 56th Street Manhattan Y Carol Management 1983 122 E42nd St Manhattan Y Chemical Bank 1983 277 Park Avenue, 2nd Floor Manhattan Y Merrill Lynch 1983 55 Water Street, Floors 36 & 37 Manhattan Y WNET Channel 13 1983 356 W 58th Street Manhattan Y Hotel President (Best Western) 1983 234 W 48th Street Manhattan Y First Boston Corp 1983 5 World Trade Center Manhattan Y Ruffa & Hanover, P.C.
[Show full text]
BROAD EXCHANGE BUILDING, 25 Broad Street (Aka 25-33 Broad Street and 44-60 Exchange Place), Manhattan
Landmarks Preservation Commission June 27, 2000, Designation List 316 LP-2074 BROAD EXCHANGE BUILDING, 25 Broad Street (aka 25-33 Broad Street and 44-60 Exchange Place), Manhattan. Built 1900-02; Clinton & Russell, architects. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 25, Lot 19. On May 16, 2000, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Broad Exchange Building and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 1). The hearing was duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Three people spoke in favor of designation, including representatives of Council member Kathryn Freed, and the Historic Districts Council. The Commission received a letter of support from the building's owner and a resolution of support from Community Board l. Summary Located in the heart of Manhattan's financial district, the Broad Exchange Building was, at the time of its construction in 1900-02, the largest office building with the highest estimated real estate value built in Manhattan. Designed by the renowned architectural firm of Clinton & Russell, the Broad Exchange Building contained 326,500 square feet of rentable floor area and was estimated to cost $3.25 million. The builders of the Broad Exchange used all the new technologies introduced during the 1890s in order to create taller structures. The twenty story high building has a steel frame, elevator, and caisson construction. The design of the building is a tripartite composition, common to many of New York's tum-of-the century skyscrapers with a base, shaft, and capital.
[Show full text]
Occupy Wall Street's Challenge to an American Public Transcript
City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 10-2014 Occupy Wall Street's Challenge to an American Public Transcript Christopher Neville Leary Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/324 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] OCCUPY WALL STREET’S CHALLENGE TO AN AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSCRIPT by Christopher Leary A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in English in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2014 This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in English in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Dr. Ira Shor ________ _ 5/21/2014 __________________ ______ Date Chair of Examining Committee __Dr. Mario DiGangi ______________ _________________________ Date Executive Officer Dr. Jessica Yood Dr. Ashley Dawson Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK ii Abstract OCCUPY WALL STREET’S CHALLENGE TO AN AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSCRIPT by Christopher Leary Adviser: Dr. Ira Shor This dissertation examines the rhetoric and discourses of the anti-corporate movement Occupy Wall Street, using frameworks from political ethnography and critical discourse analysis to offer a thick, triangulated description of a single event, Occupy Wall Street’s occupation of Zuccotti Park. The study shows how Occupy achieved a disturbing positionality relative to the forces which routinely dominate public discourse and proposes that Occupy’s encampment was politically intolerable to the status quo because the movement held the potential to consolidate critical thought and action.
[Show full text]
CITIES SERVICE BUILDING, 70 Pine Street (Aka 66-76 Pine Street, 2-18 Cedar Street, 171-185 Pearl Street), Manhattan
Landmarks Preservation Commission June 21, 2011; Designation List 443 LP-2441 CITIES SERVICE BUILDING, 70 Pine Street (aka 66-76 Pine Street, 2-18 Cedar Street, 171-185 Pearl Street), Manhattan. Built 1930-32; Clinton & Russell, Holton & George, architects. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 41, Lot 1. On May 10, 2011, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Cities Service Building and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 1). The hearing was duly advertised according to provisions of law. Six people spoke in favor of designation, including representatives of the owners, Manhattan Community Board 1, the Historic Districts Council, and the New York Landmarks Conservancy. Summary The former Cities Service Building at 70 Pine Street is a 66-story skyscraper, rising from a trapezoidal site bounded by Pine Street, Cedar Street, and Pearl Street. An icon of the lower Manhattan skyline, the building’s shaft terminates in a slender pinnacle crowned by an illuminated lantern and stainless steel spire. At the time of completion in 1932, this Art Deco style tower was the tallest structure in lower Manhattan, and at 952 feet, the third tallest structure in the world. Commissioned by a major American corporation, it was an expression of the owner’s success, escalating real estate costs, and the current zoning code that required buildings to diminish in mass as they rise. The Cities Service Company was chartered by Henry L. Doherty in 1910, and quickly grew to become one of the largest corporations in the United States, controlling approximately 150 energy firms in 38 states, including numerous oil and power suppliers.
[Show full text]
INT 84AH: Special Relativity for Pedestrians ”
Seminars are restricted to students currently enrolled in the College Honors Program through College of Letters and Science, or students in the College of Creative Studies. These two-unit courses provide an opportunity for research exploration in various disciplines and consider advanced studies beyond college. Honor seminars are 1st-2nd year students. To earn honors credit, seminars must be completed with a letter grade of B or higher. Eligible students may take 8 units maximum of INT 84 seminars and 8 units maximum. *Add codes are not required for most Honors Seminars, with a few exceptions (if you are prompted for an add code, please contact the instructor for more information) ***INT 84 Honors Seminars are lower-division and designed with first and second-year students in mind. First and second-year students in the Letters & Science Honors Program who have exceeded the "Senior" unit standing limitation for INT 84 may request an exception to bypass this restriction by emailing me at [email protected] – (Please include your PERM). Third and fourth-year students are not eligible to bypass the Senior unit standing restriction. Students who receive access to bypass the restriction must still enroll through GOLD during an active pass time while the course has space remaining. *Please note if your class is not a 10-week course the add/drop deadline may be earlier. INT 84AH - “INT 84AH: Special Relativity for Pedestrians ” • Seminar Type: Honors • Department: Physics • Instructor: Tengiz Bibilashvili • Instructor Email: [email protected] • Day - Time - Room: Wednesday 4:00-5:50 Online • Enroll Code: 52712 Course Description: The goal of the seminar is to teach Special Relativity (SR) using Einstein Notation (EN).
[Show full text]
A Town in History 1
Montoursville: a town in history 1 a town in history Contents …a snapshot in time of Montoursville history Chapter 1, Aboriginal Culture & Founding……………………………… 2 Chapter 2, Surviving the Wars…………………………………………………. 2 Chapter 3, Early Life………………………………………………………………… 3 Chapter 4, Lumber Built the Town………………………………………….. 4 Chapter 5, Rafting on the Loyalsock……………………………………….. 5 Chapter 6, Land Among the Waters Gave Us Recreation………… 5 Chapter 7, The Borough Waterworks………………………………………. 7 Chapter 8, The Water System Made Progress Possible…………… 8 Chapter 9, Schooling in Andrew’s Town………………………………….. 8 Chapter 10, Transportation……………………………………………………… 10 Chapter 11, Two Great Wars……………………………………………………. 11 Chapter 12, Visions from the Last Fifty Years………………………… 11 2 Historic Broad Street 8 Loyalsock Ave. Normal School 3 Home of Thomas Lloyd 9 First high school 3 Home of John Else 9 Montour Street School 4 Home of Gov. Shulze 9 Today’s high school 5 Park coaster 10 The “Green” bridge 5 Park Theatre 10 Old bridges 6 Indian Park today 10 Old view of the airport 6 Covered bridge 10 The airport today 7 John Hazel 12 Flight 800 memorial statue 8 Old borough building 14 Broad Street today Note: Pictures are marked as modern or historic There is a running timeline featuring key years in Montoursville history beginning on page 2 and continuing through page 11. This informational pamphlet and associated website created by Chris Garneau. Please see last page for more information. 2 Montoursville: a town in history 1. ABORIGINAL CULTURE to inhabit the land. The Susquehanna approximately 22 cents an acre. was a mecca for fisherman from Andrew Montour was twice married It was on February 19, 1850 that an act southeastern Pennsylvania and and fathered two sons, Nicholas and of the General Assembly of Delaware.
[Show full text]
Socializing Space and Politicizing Financial
Belgeo Revue belge de géographie 1-2 | 2012 Inaugural issue Socializing space and politicizing financial innovation/destruction: some observations on Occupy Wall Street Socialisation de l’espace et politisation de l’innovation/destruction financière : quelques réflexions sur le mouvement “Occupy Wall Street” Manuel B. Aalbers Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/belgeo/6155 DOI: 10.4000/belgeo.6155 ISSN: 2294-9135 Publisher: National Committee of Geography of Belgium, Société Royale Belge de Géographie Electronic reference Manuel B. Aalbers, « Socializing space and politicizing ﬁnancial innovation/destruction: some observations on Occupy Wall Street », Belgeo [Online], 1-2 | 2012, Online since 15 December 2012, connection on 19 April 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/belgeo/6155 ; DOI : 10.4000/ belgeo.6155 This text was automatically generated on 19 April 2019. Belgeo est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. Socializing space and politicizing financial innovation/destruction: some obs... 1 Socializing space and politicizing financial innovation/destruction: some observations on Occupy Wall Street Socialisation de l’espace et politisation de l’innovation/destruction financière : quelques réflexions sur le mouvement “Occupy Wall Street” Manuel B. Aalbers Introduction 1 Most protests call for specific changes in specific places. Higher wages, shorter work weeks, equal pay for men and woman, no more separated seating in buses, no more budget cuts, no more bombs, no more discrimination. Usually such demands are specific to a city or country or even to one economic sector within that city or country. In that light, the demands of Occupy Wall Street (OWS) and its offshoots around the globe are not clear.
[Show full text]
Guide to the Department of Buildings Architectural Drawings and Plans for Lower Manhattan, Circa 1866-1978 Collection No
NEW YORK CITY MUNICIPAL ARCHIVES 31 CHAMBERS ST., NEW YORK, NY 10007 Guide to the Department of Buildings architectural drawings and plans for Lower Manhattan, circa 1866-1978 Collection No. REC 0074 Processing, description, and rehousing by the Rolled Building Plans Project Team (2018-ongoing): Amy Stecher, Porscha Williams Fuller, David Mathurin, Clare Manias, Cynthia Brenwall. Finding aid written by Amy Stecher in May 2020. NYC Municipal Archives Guide to the Department of Buildings architectural drawings and plans for Lower Manhattan, circa 1866-1978 1 NYC Municipal Archives Guide to the Department of Buildings architectural drawings and plans for Lower Manhattan, circa 1866-1978 Summary Record Group: RG 025: Department of Buildings Title of the Collection: Department of Buildings architectural drawings and plans for Lower Manhattan Creator(s): Manhattan (New York, N.Y.). Bureau of Buildings; Manhattan (New York, N.Y.). Department of Buildings; New York (N.Y.). Department of Buildings; New York (N.Y.). Department of Housing and Buildings; New York (N.Y.). Department for the Survey and Inspection of Buildings; New York (N.Y.). Fire Department. Bureau of Inspection of Buildings; New York (N.Y.). Tenement House Department Date: circa 1866-1978 Abstract: The Department of Buildings requires the filing of applications and supporting material for permits to construct or alter buildings in New York City. This collection contains the plans and drawings filed with the Department of Buildings between 1866-1978, for the buildings on all 958 blocks of Lower Manhattan, from the Battery to 34th Street, as well as a small quantity of material for blocks outside that area.
[Show full text]
Street Plan of New Amsterdam and Colonial New York, Manhattan
Landmarks Preservation Commission June 14, 1983, Designation List 165 LP-1235 STREET PLAN OF NEH AMSTERDAM AND COLONIAL NEW YORK. Street Plan of New Amsterdam and Colonial New York, Manhattan. Beaver Street (incorporating Bever Graft, Princes Street, and Sloat Lane, later Merchant Street) from Broadway to Pearl Street Bridge Street (incorporating Brugh Straat, later Hull Street) from ~fuitehall Street to Broad Street Broad Street (incorporating Heere Graft, also called Prince Graft) from Wall Street to Pearl Street Broadway (incorporating Heere Straet, later Broad Way) from Wall Street to Stone Street Exchange Place (incorporating Heer dwars straet and Tuyn Straet, later Church Street, then Flatten Barrack and Garden Street) from Broadway to Hanover Street Hanover Square (incorporating the slip) from· Stone Street to Pearl Street Hanover Street (incorporating a portion of Sloat Lane) from Wall Street to Pearl Street Marketfield Street (incorporating Marckvelt Steegh, later Petticoat Lane) ·from New Street to Broad Street Mill Lane from South \>Jilliam Street to Stone Street New Street from Wall Street to Marketfield Street Pearl Street (incorporating The Strand, later Dock Street) from Whitehall Street to Wall Street South William Street (incorporating Glaziers' Street, later Slyck Steegh, Muddy Lane, Mill Street Lane, and Hill Street) from Broad Street to William Street Stone Street (incorporating Breurs Straet, later Straet van de Graft, Brouwer Straet, Stony Street, and Duke Street) from Broadway to Broad Street and from the intersection
[Show full text]
S. JARMULOWSKY BANK BUILDING, 54 Canal Street (Aka 54-58 Canal Street, 5-9 Orchard Street), Borough of Manhattan
Landmarks Preservation Commission October 13, 2009, Designation List 419 LP-2363 S. JARMULOWSKY BANK BUILDING, 54 Canal Street (aka 54-58 Canal Street, 5-9 Orchard Street), Borough of Manhattan. Built 1911-12; Rouse & Goldstone, architects. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 294, Lot 8. On June 23, 2009, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation of the S. Jarmulowsky Bank Building (Item No. 17). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Five witnesses spoke in favor of the building’s designation, including a representative of Council Member Alan J. Gerson; Joyce Mendelsohn, author of The Lower East Side Remembered and Revisited; and representatives of the Bowery Alliance of Neighbors, the Historic Districts Council, and the Museum at Eldridge Street. Two representatives of the building’s owner also testified, stating that the owner had no objection to its designation. Summary Called “the first strictly high-class tall bank and office building” on the Lower East Side, with a design “equal in every respect [to] the highest grade banking buildings throughout the city,” the S. Jarmulowsky Bank Building was completed in 1912 as the architectural showpiece of one of the neighborhood’s most prominent bankers. Born in 1841 in what was then the Russian province of Lomza, its owner, Sender Jarmulowsky, established his business on the Lower East Side in 1873 and was operating at this location by 1878. Known for his honesty and conservative financial approach, Jarmulowsky grew wealthy over the following three decades providing steamship tickets and banking services to the immigrants of the surrounding neighborhood, which was unrivaled as the world’s largest Jewish community.
[Show full text]