Molecular Simulation, Mixture Optimization and Experimental Validation in Carbonated Soft Drinks

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Molecular Simulation, Mixture Optimization and Experimental Validation in Carbonated Soft Drinks PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATOLICA DE CHILE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING ORGANOLEPTICAL PROPERTIES OF NATURAL, NON-CALORIC SWEETENERS: MOLECULAR SIMULATION, MIXTURE OPTIMIZATION AND EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION IN CARBONATED SOFT DRINKS WALDO ANDRÉS ACEVEDO CASTILLO Thesis submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor in Engineering Sciences Advisor: EDUARDO AGOSIN Santiago de Chile, November, 2017 2017, Waldo Andrés Acevedo Castillo PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATOLICA DE CHILE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING ORGANOLEPTICAL PROPERTIES OF NATURAL, NON-CALORIC SWEETENERS: MOLECULAR SIMULATION, MIXTURE OPTIMIZATION AND EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION IN CARBONATED SOFT DRINKS WALDO ANDRÉS ACEVEDO CASTILLO Members of the Committee: EDUARDO AGOSIN T. RICARDO PÉREZ C. DANILO GONZÁLEZ N. JAVIER SÁINZ L. PIERO A. TEMUSSI JORGE VÁSQUEZ P. Thesis submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor in Engineering Sciences Santiago de Chile, November, 2017 To my family, Ximena, Valentina and Sebastián. To my parent, Marlene and Sergio To my grandmother, Teresa To my brother, Aroldo i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank all people who have contributed to this work either in the research area or with everyday support. Many thanks also to everyone in the Biotechnology laboratory of the Chemical Engineering and Bioprocess Department and “Centro de Aromas y Sabores – DICTUC” for their friendship and for making the laboratory an agreeable place to work. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisor, Professor Eduardo Agosin, for his continuous support, motivation, and patience, his valuable supervision, his sharp observations and good advice throughout this thesis. His guidance helped me in all the time of research and writing of this thesis. I could not have imagined having a better advisor and mentor for my Ph.D. study. Also thanks to professors Piero A. Temussi, Danilo González, Javier Sáinz and Ricardo Pérez for their support in different stages of this thesis and for their comments and discussions to improve the final version of this manuscript and the oral presentation. In particular, I am grateful to Dr. Temussi for enlightening me the glance of research. Thanks to the Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (CONICYT), the Vicerrectoría de Investigación (VRI) and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile for providing the necessary funding to make this research possible. Last but not the least, I would like to thank my wife, Ximena, and my children, Valentina and Sebastián, for supporting me spiritually throughout writing this thesis and my life in general. ii LIST OF PUBLICATIONS This thesis is based on the following publications. Acevedo, W.A, González-Nilo, F., Agosin, E. 2016. Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Steviol Glycosides – Human Bitter Receptors Interactions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 64, 7585 – 7596. Acevedo, W.A, Ramírez-Sarmiento, C., Agosin, E. 2017. Identifying the Interactions between Natural, Non-Caloric Sweeteners and the Human Sweet Receptor by Molecular Docking. (Submitted to Journal of Food Chemistry, Manuscript ID: FOODCHEM-S-17-0923) Acevedo, W.A, Capitaine, C., Rodríguez, R., Araya, I., González-Nilo, F., Pérez- Correa, R, Agosin, E. 2017. Selecting Optimal Mixtures of Natural Sweeteners for Carbonated Soft Drinks through Multi-objective Decision Modeling and Sensory Validation. (Submitted to Food Quality and Preference Journal. Manuscript ID: FQAP_2017_5 ) iii INDEX OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................... ii LIST OF PUBLICATIONS ...................................................................................... iii INDEX OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................... iv FIGURE INDEX ..................................................................................................... viii TABLE INDEX ........................................................................................................ xii ABREVIATION INDEX ........................................................................................ xiii ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................. xv RESUMEN ............................................................................................................. xviii 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 Motivation .................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Taste Receptors .......................................................................................... 1 1.2.1 Sweetness Receptor ......................................................................... 1 1.2.2 Bitterness Receptor .......................................................................... 4 1.3 Natural, non-caloric sweeteners ................................................................. 5 1.3.1 Low-molecular-weight sweeteners .................................................. 6 1.3.2 Sweet proteins .................................................................................. 7 1.4 Optimal mixtures of sweeteners ................................................................ 9 1.5 Working hypothesis ................................................................................. 10 1.6 Objectives ................................................................................................ 10 1.7 Approach ................................................................................................. 11 2. CHAPTER I: DOCKING AND MOLECULAR DYNAMICS OF STEVIOL GLYCOSIDE - HUMAN BITTER RECEPTORS INTERACTIONS............................................................................................ 13 iv 2.1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 13 2.2 Materials and methods ............................................................................. 16 2.2.1 Template selection ......................................................................... 16 2.2.2 Modeling of bitter taste receptors .................................................. 16 2.2.3 Ligand preparation ......................................................................... 17 2.2.4 Molecular docking of "sweeeteners - bitter taste receptors" ......... 18 2.2.5 Mathematical modeling of the relationship between relative bitterness and the interaction paramter .......................................... 19 2.2.6 Analysis of protein - ligand interaction ......................................... 19 2.2.7 Molecular dynamics simulations ................................................... 20 2.2.8 Steered molecular dynamics simulations ....................................... 21 2.3 Results ...................................................................................................... 22 2.3.1 Modeling of taste receptors responsible for the bitterness of stevia .............................................................................................. 22 2.3.2 Molecular docking and binding site characterization .................... 23 2.3.3 Ligand - receptor molecular dynamics simulations ....................... 30 2.3.4 Steered molecular dynamics simulations ....................................... 31 2.4 Discussion ................................................................................................ 33 2.5 Acknowledgments ................................................................................... 36 3. CHAPTER II: IDENTIFYING THE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN NATURAL, NON-CALORIC SWEETENERS AND THE HUMAN SWEET RECEPTOR BY MOLECULAR DOCKING ....................................................... 37 3.1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 37 3.2 Materials and methods ............................................................................. 40 3.2.1 Template selection ......................................................................... 40 3.2.2 Modeling of sweet taste receptor ................................................... 40 3.2.3 Preparation of ligands .................................................................... 41 3.2.4 Molecular docking of "sweeeteners – sweet taste receptor" .......... 42 3.3 Results ...................................................................................................... 44 3.3.1 Modeling of sweet taste receptor ................................................... 44 v 3.3.2 Analisys of molecular docking ...................................................... 44 3.4 Discussion ................................................................................................ 49 3.5 Conclusions .............................................................................................. 51 3.6 Acknowledgments .................................................................................... 52 4. CHAPTER III: SELECTING OPTIMAL MIXTURES OF NATURAL SWEETENERS FOR CARBONATED SOFT DRINKS THROUGH MULTI-OBJECTIVE DECISION MODELING AND SENSORY VALIDATION ............................................................................................... 54 4.1 Introduction .............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Functional Expression of the Sweet-Tasting Protein Brazzein In
    a ISSN 0101-2061 (Print) Food Science and Technology ISSN 1678-457X (Online) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.40521 Functional expression of the sweet-tasting protein brazzein in transgenic tobacco Hyo-Eun CHOI1, Ji-In LEE1, Seon-Yeong JO1, Yun-Cheol CHAE2, Jeong-Hwan LEE3, Hyeon-Jin SUN4, Kisung KO3, Sungguan HONG1* , Kwang-Hoon KONG1* Abstract The sweet-tasting protein, brazzein, has potential as a low-calorie sugar substitute owing to its high sweetness, stability, and water solubility. In this study, the synthetic brazzein gene was expressed in the tobacco plant, Nicotiana tabacum. Three types of expression cassettes containing the brazzein gene were constructed to examine the expression and purification efficiency of the brazzein: pBI-BZ1 containing a signal sequence and His-tag, pBI-BZ2 containing a signal sequence, and pBI-BZ3 containing only the brazzein gene. Brazzein expression confirmed by ELISA was purified using ammonium sulfate precipitation, heat treatment, and CM-sepharose chromatography. The purity and conformational state of the brazzein were confirmed using SDS-PAGE, HPLC, and circular dichroism. The identity of the brazzein was confirmed by N-terminal amino acid analysis, ESI-MS/MS, and sweetness analysis. We successfully generated brazzein overexpression tobacco plants, suggesting that this method could be used as a brazzein production platform to provide an alternative to currently produced sweeteners. Keywords: alternative sweetener; brazzein; Agrobacterium-mediated transformation; transgenic tobacco plant; protein purification. Practical Application: Our study provides an economic mass-production system for this sweet-tasting protein, brazzein, with potential use as an alternative sweetener in the food industry. 1 Introduction The appeal sweet food is undeniable, however, excessive (Assadi-Porter et al., 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Sweetness and Stability of the Single Chain Monellin MNEI
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Sweeter and stronger: enhancing sweetness and stability of the single chain monellin MNEI through Received: 08 July 2016 Accepted: 07 September 2016 molecular design Published: 23 September 2016 Serena Leone1, Andrea Pica1, Antonello Merlino1, Filomena Sannino1, Piero Andrea Temussi1,2 & Delia Picone1 Sweet proteins are a family of proteins with no structure or sequence homology, able to elicit a sweet sensation in humans through their interaction with the dimeric T1R2-T1R3 sweet receptor. In particular, monellin and its single chain derivative (MNEI) are among the sweetest proteins known to men. Starting from a careful analysis of the surface electrostatic potentials, we have designed new mutants of MNEI with enhanced sweetness. Then, we have included in the most promising variant the stabilising mutation E23Q, obtaining a construct with enhanced performances, which combines extreme sweetness to high, pH-independent, thermal stability. The resulting mutant, with a sweetness threshold of only 0.28 mg/L (25 nM) is the strongest sweetener known to date. All the new proteins have been produced and purified and the structures of the most powerful mutants have been solved by X-ray crystallography. Docking studies have then confirmed the rationale of their interaction with the human sweet receptor, hinting at a previously unpredicted role of plasticity in said interaction. Sweet proteins are a family of structurally unrelated proteins that can elicit a sweet sensation in humans. To date, eight sweet and sweet taste-modifying proteins have been identified: monellin1, thaumatin2, brazzein3, pentadin4, mabinlin5, miraculin6, neoculin7 and lysozyme8. With the sole exception of lysozyme, all sweet proteins have been purified from plants, but, besides this common feature, they share no structure or sequence homology9.
    [Show full text]
  • Sweet Sensations by Judie Bizzozero | Senior Editor
    [Confections] July 2015 Sweet Sensations By Judie Bizzozero | Senior Editor By R.J. Foster, Contributing Editor For many, terms like “reduced-sugar” or “sugar-free” do not go with the word “candy.” And yet, the confectionery industry is facing growing demand for treats that offer the taste people have grown to love without the adverse health effects they’re looking to avoid. Thankfully, there is a growing palette of ingredients from which candy makers can paint a new picture of sweetness that will be appreciated by the even most discerning of confectionery critics. SUGAR ALCOHOLS Also referred to as polyols, sugar alcohols are a common ingredient in reduced-sugar and sugar-free applications, especially confections. Funny thing, they’re not sugars or alcohols. Carbohydrate chains composed of monomeric, dimeric and polymeric units, polyols resemble both sugars and alcohols, but do not contain an ethanol molecule. All but two sugar alcohols are less sweet than sugar. Being only partially digestible, though, replacing a portion of a formulation’s sugar with a sugar alcohol reduces total calories without losing bulk (which can occur when replacing sugar with high-intensity sweeteners). Unique flavoring, texturizing and moisture-controlling effects also make polyols well-suited for confectionery products. Two very common and very similar monomeric polyols are sorbitol and mannitol. Present in a variety of fruits and vegetables, both are derived from products of cornstarch hydrolysis. Sorbitol is made via hydrogenation of glucose, which is why sorbitol is sometimes referred to as glucitol. Mannitol is created when fructose hydrogenation converts fructose into mannose, for which the final product, mannitol, is named.
    [Show full text]
  • Reports of the Scientific Committee for Food
    Commission of the European Communities food - science and techniques Reports of the Scientific Committee for Food (Sixteenth series) Commission of the European Communities food - science and techniques Reports of the Scientific Committee for Food (Sixteenth series) Directorate-General Internal Market and Industrial Affairs 1985 EUR 10210 EN Published by the COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Directorate-General Information Market and Innovation Bâtiment Jean Monnet LUXEMBOURG LEGAL NOTICE Neither the Commission of the European Communities nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information This publication is also available in the following languages : DA ISBN 92-825-5770-7 DE ISBN 92-825-5771-5 GR ISBN 92-825-5772-3 FR ISBN 92-825-5774-X IT ISBN 92-825-5775-8 NL ISBN 92-825-5776-6 Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1985 ISBN 92-825-5773-1 Catalogue number: © ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels · Luxembourg, 1985 Printed in Luxembourg CONTENTS Page Reports of the Scientific Committee for Food concerning - Sweeteners (Opinion expressed 14 September 1984) III Composition of the Scientific Committee for Food P.S. Elias A.G. Hildebrandt (vice-chairman) F. Hill A. Hubbard A. Lafontaine Mne B.H. MacGibbon A. Mariani-Costantini K.J. Netter E. Poulsen (chairman) J. Rey V. Silano (vice-chairman) Mne A. Trichopoulou R. Truhaut G.J. Van Esch R. Wemig IV REPORT OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE FOR FOOD ON SWEETENERS (Opinion expressed 14 September 1984) TERMS OF REFERENCE To review the safety in use of certain sweeteners.
    [Show full text]
  • Essen Rivesta Issue 26
    ISSUE NO 27 FEB ‘19 2 ABOUT THE EDITION, 3 SWEETNER FOR SUGAR INDUSTRY SWEET NEWS FOR FARMERS: NOW, ELECTION REPORT: ‘LOAN OF A DISEASE-RESISTANT SUGARCANE ₹12,000 CRORES’ Sujakumari M Keerthiga R R Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya has The Narendra Modi government is looking at yet produced tissue culture saplings of disease-free another relief package for sugar companies, and this sugarcane plant with naturally high level of is going to be twice the size of one announced in sweetness, which will translate into good quality September 2018.This relief package facilitates the sugar in mills. This is the first time such a sapling has loan which is nearly ₹12,000 crore for which the ex- been produced. chequer will bear 5-6% interest subvention for 5 IGKV has four lakh such saplings available for sale years. The loans will be granted for enhancing at a rate of ₹8 per piece. The IGKV tissue culture lab ethanol production. The package is being finalised by developed the variety using sugarcane from the Prime Minister’s Office, Finance Ministry, Coimbatore. Lab in charge, Dr SL Verma said, Agriculture Ministry and the Food Ministry. farmers generally sow sugarcane either as a mature India is staring at a second consecutive year of step bud shoots, or by extracting buds by a chipping surplus sugar production this season. Indian Sugar machine and sowing them directly in the soil. “The Mills Association has estimated the country’s sugar practice however requires massive quantity of buds output in 2018-19 at 31.5-32 million tonnes.
    [Show full text]
  • Highly Sweet Compounds of Plant Origin T
    glrthi~eS of ~armata[ ge~earth Arch Pharm Res Vol 25, No 6, 725-746, 2002 http://apr.psk.or.kr Highly Sweet Compounds of Plant Origin t Nam-Cheol Kim I and A. Douglas Kinghorn 2 1Chemistry and Life Sciences, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, U.S.A. and 2Program for Collaborative Research in the Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. (Received October 18, 2002) The demand for new alternative "low calorie" sweeteners for dietetic and diabetic purposes has increased worldwide. Although the currently developed and commercially used highly sweet sucrose substitutes are mostly synthetic compounds, the search for such compounds from natural sources is continuing. As of mid-2002, over 100 plant-derived sweet compounds of 20 major structural types had been reported, and were isolated from more than 25 different families of green plants. Several of these highly sweet natural products are marketed as sweeteners or flavoring agents in some countries as pure compounds, compound mixtures, or refined extracts. These highly sweet natural substances are reviewed herein. Key words: Low-Calorie Natural Sweeteners, Plants, Glycyrrhizin, Mogroside V, Rebaudio- side A, Stevioside, Thaumatin, Terpenoids, Steroids, Flavonoids, Proteins INTRODUCTION Most of the currently available potently sweet, low calorie sucrose substitutes in the world market are synthetic com- The consumption of sucrose as a sweetener has been pounds, inclusive of acesulfame-K, alitame, aspartame, associated with several nutritional and medical problems, cyclamate, saccharin, and sucralose (Duffy and Anderson, with dental caries being the most widely described (Grenby, 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Stevia Leaf Reb M” (I, 2018) Suppliers: • 2017: I • 2018 C, D
    9/27/2018 1 Answer Today’s High Sugar and Clean Label Concerns with 3rd Generation Stevia Alex Woo, PhD Chief Innovation Officer Nascent SoPure Stevia 9/27/2018 2 We love it! Nascent Innovation Core Competencies • Taste • Plant-based High • Smell potency sweeteners • Sight • Non/low caloric • Sound bulk sweeteners • Touch • Natural flavors Sweeteners Neuroscience and Flavors Taste Formulation Modulation • Sweetness • Stacking modulators • Matrix • Bitterness • Beverages & Foods modulators • Enhancement without ingredients 9/27/2018 3 We love it! Executive Summary • 2nd generation stevia extracts were all about high purity RA, the higher the purity the better the taste. • Farm-based 3rd generation stevia extracts are the newer 2-way and 3-way blends of RABCDM for even more sugar like taste but at higher cost. Alternatively, fermentation and enzymology-based stevia already co-exist with farm-based stevia in 2018. • Enzymatically modified stevia extracts are sweet taste enhancers that can be used as part of the stacking strategy for sugar reduction. • Stacking is a sugar reduction strategy for building up to the required sweetness intensity and profile while staying below the off flavor thresholds for all the plant-based ingredients used 9/27/2018 4 We love it! Agenda • Sweetness neuroscience • Stevia as sweetener • Stevia as flavor • Stacking 9/27/2018 5 We love it! Re-Defining “Flavor” = Taste + Smell + More Taste (5+ primary) Smell (aroma) Somatosensation (Touch): • Mechanoreception: Touch, Pressure and Vibration (Prescott, 2015), • Thermoception: Temperature, • Nociception: Pain (Youseff, 2015), and • Up to total 30 senses? (Smith, 2016) can they all be part of somatosensation? Vision (“Seeing the flavor”.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biobrick Compatible Strategy for Genetic Modification of Plants Boyle Et Al
    A BioBrick compatible strategy for genetic modification of plants Boyle et al. Boyle et al. Journal of Biological Engineering 2012, 6:8 http://www.jbioleng.org/content/6/1/8 Boyle et al. Journal of Biological Engineering 2012, 6:8 http://www.jbioleng.org/content/6/1/8 METHODOLOGY Open Access A BioBrick compatible strategy for genetic modification of plants Patrick M Boyle1†, Devin R Burrill1†, Mara C Inniss1†, Christina M Agapakis1,7†, Aaron Deardon2, Jonathan G DeWerd2, Michael A Gedeon2, Jacqueline Y Quinn2, Morgan L Paull2, Anugraha M Raman2, Mark R Theilmann2, Lu Wang2, Julia C Winn2, Oliver Medvedik3, Kurt Schellenberg4, Karmella A Haynes1,8, Alain Viel3, Tamara J Brenner3, George M Church5,6, Jagesh V Shah1* and Pamela A Silver1,5* Abstract Background: Plant biotechnology can be leveraged to produce food, fuel, medicine, and materials. Standardized methods advocated by the synthetic biology community can accelerate the plant design cycle, ultimately making plant engineering more widely accessible to bioengineers who can contribute diverse creative input to the design process. Results: This paper presents work done largely by undergraduate students participating in the 2010 International Genetically Engineered Machines (iGEM) competition. Described here is a framework for engineering the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana with standardized, BioBrick compatible vectors and parts available through the Registry of Standard Biological Parts (www.partsregistry.org). This system was used to engineer a proof-of-concept plant that exogenously expresses the taste-inverting protein miraculin. Conclusions: Our work is intended to encourage future iGEM teams and other synthetic biologists to use plants as a genetic chassis.
    [Show full text]
  • Taste Responsiveness to Two Steviol Glycosides in Three Species of Nonhuman Primates
    Current Zoology, 2018, 64(1), 63–68 doi: 10.1093/cz/zox012 Advance Access Publication Date: 27 February 2017 Article Article Taste responsiveness to two steviol glycosides in three species of nonhuman primates a a a,b c Sandra NICKLASSON , Desire´eSJO¨ STRO¨ M , Mats AMUNDIN , Daniel ROTH , d a, Laura Teresa HERNANDEZ SALAZAR , and Matthias LASKA * aIFM Biology, Linko¨ping University, Linko¨ping, SE-581 83, bKolma˚rden Wildlife Park, Kolma˚rden, SE-681 92, cBora˚s Zoo, Bora˚s, SE-501 13, Sweden, and dInstituto de Neuro-Etologia, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, C.P. 91000, Mexico *Address correspondence to Matthias Laska. E-mail: [email protected]. Received on 23 December 2016; accepted on 21 February 2017 Abstract Primates have been found to differ widely in their taste perception and studies suggest that a co- evolution between plant species bearing a certain taste substance and primate species feeding on these plants may contribute to such between-species differences. Considering that only platyrrhine primates, but not catarrhine or prosimian primates, share an evolutionary history with the neotrop- ical plant Stevia rebaudiana, we assessed whether members of these three primate taxa differ in their ability to perceive and/or in their sensitivity to its two quantitatively predominant sweet- tasting substances. We found that not only neotropical black-handed spider monkeys, but also paleotropical black-and-white ruffed lemurs and Western chimpanzees are clearly able to perceive stevioside and rebaudioside A. Using a two-bottle preference test of short duration, we found that Ateles geoffroyi preferred concentrations as low as 0.05 mM stevioside and 0.01 mM rebaudioside A over tap water.
    [Show full text]
  • Large-Scale All-Electron Quantum Chemical Calculation Toward a Sweet-Tasting Protein, Brazzein, and Its Mutants
    Large-Scale All-Electron Quantum Chemical Calculation Toward a Sweet-Tasting Protein, Brazzein, and Its Mutants Yoichiro Yagi 1,2 and Yoshinobu Naoshima 1,2 1 Institute of Natural Science, Okayama University of Science, Japan 2 Graduate School of Informatics, Okayama University of Science, Japan 1 Introduction It had been recognized for many years that only small method program, ProteinDF. The former mutant is sweeter than molecules were capable of causing a sweet taste. The search for the brazzein and the latter mutant has a taste like water. sweeteners, however, found out naturally occurring sweet- tasting macromolecules, namely sweet proteins, in a variety of 2 Computational Methods West African and South Asian fruits. Thaumatin was first The NMR structure of brazzein was downloaded from identified as one of the sweet proteins, and then monellin, Protein Data Bank (PDB code: 2brz) and the structure of des - mabinlin, pentadin, curculin, brazzein, and neoculin were pGlu brazzein (Fig. 1(a)) obtained by removal of N-terminal isolated sequentially. Sweet-tasting proteins are expected to be a pyro-grutamate from brazzein. Since the structures of two potential replacement for natural sugars and artificial sweeteners . different mutants Glu41Lys and Arg43Ala are not available in The human sweet taste receptor is a heterodimer of two G- the Protein Data Bank, we mutated the amino acid residues protein coupled receptor subunits, T1R2 and T1R3, and broadly Glu41 and Arg43 in des -pGlu brazzein to Lys and Ala, responsive to natural sugars, artificial sweeteners, D-amino acids, respectively, by using ProteinEditor implemented in ProteinDF and sweet-tasting proteins.
    [Show full text]
  • Sweeteners and Sweet Taste Enhancers in the Food Industry Monique CARNIEL BELTRAMI1, Thiago DÖRING2, Juliano DE DEA LINDNER3*
    a OSSN 0101-2061 (Print) Food Science and Technology OSSN 1678-457X (Dnline) DDO: https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.31117 Sweeteners and sweet taste enhancers in the food industry Monique CARNOEL BELTRAMO1, Thiago DÖRONG2, Juliano DE DEA LONDNER3* Abstract The search for new sweeteners technologies has increased substantially in the past decades as the number of diseases related to the excessive consumption of sugar became a public health concern. Low carbohydrates diets help to reduce ingested calories and to maintain a healthy weight. Most natural and synthetic high potency non-caloric sweeteners, known to date, show limitations in taste quality and are generally used in combination due to their complementary flavor characteristics and physicochemical properties in order to minimize undesirable features. The challenge of the food manufacturers is to develop low or calorie-free products without compromising the real taste of sugar expected by consumers. With the discovery of the genes coding for the sweet taste receptor in humans, entirely new flavor ingredients were identified, which are tasteless on their own, but potentially enhance the taste of sugar. These small molecules known as positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) could be more effective than other reported taste enhancers at reducing calories in consumer products. PAMs could represent a breakthrough in the field of flavor development after the increase in the knowledge of safety profile in combination with sucrose in humans. Keywords: positive allosteric modulators; sweet taste receptor; sugar; non-caloric sweeteners. Practical Application: The food industry uses more and more sweeteners to supply the demand for alternative sugar substitutes in products with no added, low or sugar free claims.
    [Show full text]
  • Essen Rivesta Issue 26
    ISSUE NO 27 FEB ‘19 2 FROM THE EDITOR, 3 SWEETNER FOR SUGAR INDUSTRY SWEET NEWS FOR FARMERS: NOW, ELECTION REPORT: ‘LOAN OF A DISEASE-RESISTANT SUGARCANE ₹12,000 CRORES’ Sujakumari M Keerthiga R R Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya has The Narendra Modi government is looking at yet produced tissue culture saplings of disease-free another relief package for sugar companies, and this sugarcane plant with naturally high level of is going to be twice the size of one announced in sweetness, which will translate into good quality September 2018.This relief package facilitates the sugar in mills. This is the first time such a sapling has loan which is nearly ₹12,000 crore for which the ex- been produced. chequer will bear 5-6% interest subvention for 5 IGKV has four lakh such saplings available for sale years. The loans will be granted for enhancing at a rate of ₹8 per piece. The IGKV tissue culture lab ethanol production. The package is being finalised by developed the variety using sugarcane from the Prime Minister’s Office, Finance Ministry, Coimbatore. Lab in charge, Dr SL Verma said, Agriculture Ministry and the Food Ministry. farmers generally sow sugarcane either as a mature India is staring at a second consecutive year of step bud shoots, or by extracting buds by a chipping surplus sugar production this season. Indian Sugar machine and sowing them directly in the soil. “The Mills Association has estimated the country’s sugar practice however requires massive quantity of buds output in 2018-19 at 31.5-32 million tonnes.
    [Show full text]