Mechanistic Studies of Inhibitors of Dna Replication
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
MECHANISTIC STUDIES OF INHIBITORS OF DNA REPLICATION RESTART PATHWAYS IN NEISSERIA GONORRHOEAE Thesis Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Master of Science in Chemistry By Dasharatha Radha Krishna C. Aduri UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio December, 2013 MECHANISTIC STUDIES OF INHIBITORS OF DNA REPLICATION RESTART PATHWAYS IN NEISSERIA GONORRHOEAE Name: Aduri, Dasharatha Radha Krishna C. APPROVED BY: ________________________________________________ Matthew E. Lopper, Ph.D. Faculty Advisor Assistant Professor Department of Chemistry ________________________________________________ Garry Crosson, Ph.D. Committee Member Assistant Professor Department of Chemistry ________________________________________________ Mark B. Masthay, Ph.D. Committee Member Associate Professor, Chair Department of Chemistry ________________________________________________ Shawn M. Swavey, Ph.D. Committee Member Associate Professor Department of Chemistry ii ABSTRACT MECHANISTIC STUDIES OF INHIBITORS OF DNA REPLICATION RESTART PATHWAYS IN NEISSERIA GONORRHOEAE Name: Aduri, Dasharatha Radha Krishna C. University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. Matthew E. Lopper, Ph.D. Complete and faithful replication of a cell’s genetic information is an essential process. Many enzymes are involved in the process of successfully duplicating a cell’s genetic information. Helicases, DNA polymerases, ligases, nucleases, and DNA binding proteins all play a role in DNA replication. However, the integrity of these enzymes can be compromised when they encounter DNA damage, which in general could be caused by chemical mutagens, ionizing radiations, or reactive oxidative species. Bacterial cells use a pathway called “DNA replication restart” to resume DNA replication following a disruptive encounter of the DNA replication enzymes with DNA damage. This pathway is catalyzed by primosome proteins, including PriA, PriB, PriC, DnaT, DnaB, DnaC, and DnaG. The importance of DNA replication restart for bacterial cell survival is demonstrated by the inability of strains that carry mutations in key primosome genes to grow and resist DNA damaging agents. iii Furthermore, this pathway is specific for bacterial cells: human cells don’t use the same replication restart pathway and they don’t encode genes for the primosome proteins that function in bacteria. Since DNA replication restart pathways are essential for bacterial cell growth and survival and are notably absent in human cells, we seek to answer the following question: can bacterial DNA replication restart pathways be targeted with novel antibacterial compounds? In order to answer this question, we have developed an enzyme based assay for high-throughput inhibitor screening to identify compounds that block the function of the primosome proteins PriA and PriB. Several interesting lead compounds have already been identified from the preliminary screening. In this study, the lead compounds have been validated as legitimate inhibitors and characterized with respect to their potency and mechanism of action. iv Dedicated to my family and friends. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to my advisor, Dr Matthew E. Lopper. I attribute the successful completion of my thesis project and writing of my thesis to his invaluable guidance, effort, and encouragement. Starting life as a research student one simply could not wish for a better or friendlier supervisor. His enthusiasm for biochemistry, his communication and leadership skills will always be an inspiration to me. I would like to thank my committee numbers Dr. Mark B. Masthay, Dr. Shawn M. Swavey and Dr. Garry Crosson for their support. I am grateful to my instructors Dr. David Johnson, Dr. Shawn Swavey, Dr. Gary Crosson, Dr. Mark Masthay and Dr. Matthew Lopper for their invaluable teaching and guidance. I specially thank Dr. Kevin Church for his help in selecting courses. In addition, I would also like to offer my sincerest gratitude to Paula Keil, Dr. Rochael Swavey for helping me with my teaching duties. I sincerely appreciate Connie Schell and Margaret Goodrich for being patient with me and sending reminders whenever I forgot to complete any office formality. On the whole I would like to thank Chemistry Department at University of Dayton for supporting me throughout my masters. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ……………………………………………………………………iii DEDICATION …………………………………………………………………v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ……………………………………………………vi LIST OF FIGURES …………………………………………………………….ix LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………...xi CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………..1 CHAPTER II METHODS ……………………………………………………....6 II-1 Purification of N. gonorrhoeae PriA ………………………………….....6 II-2 Purification of N. gonorrhoeae PriB ………………………………….....7 II-3 Purification of E. coli PriA ……………………………………………....8 II-4 Construction of Fork 2 DNA…………….……………………………....8 II-5 Helicase assays…………………………………………………………...9 II-6 ATP hydrolysis assays………………….………………………………..11 II-7 Crystallization ……………………………………………….…………..13 vii II-8 Determination of IC50 value ……………………………………………14 CHAPTER III RESULTS ……………………………………………………...16 III-1 Effect of Inhibitor F0298-0039 ………………………………………..16 III-2 Effect of Inhibitor F0359-0046 ………………………………………..18 III-3 Effect of Inhibitor F0683-0441 ………………………………………..20 III-4 Effect of Inhibitor F2018-1489 ………………………………………..22 III-5 Effect of Inhibitor F0683-0207 ………………………………………..24 III-6 Mechanism of the Inhibition of DNA replication restart process of Neisseria gonorrhoeae by F0683-0207…………………………………………….26 III-6-1 ATP hydrolysis experiments- DNA titrations ………….…………….27 III-6-2 ATP hydrolysis experiments- ATP titrations…………………………30 III-7 Effect of F0683-0207 on E. coli PriA…………………………………..32 III-8 Determining the activity of F0683-0207 on E. coli (MG 1655)………..33 III-9 Crystallization ………………………………………………………….35 CHAPTER IV CONCLUSIONS ………………………………………………40 REFERENCES …………………………………………………………………42 viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: DNA replication process………………………………….……………2 Figure 2a: Unwinding of duplex DNA by PriA helicase ………………………..9 Figure 2b: Decrease in the fluorescence polarization value …………………….10 Figure 3: PriA catalyzed ATP regeneration cycle ……………………………….13 Figure 4: Structure of the Inhibitor F0298-0039 ………………………………...16 Figure 5a: Average data of the effect of F0298-0039 on N. gon PriA……..........17 Figure 5b: Average data of the effect of F0298-0039 on N. gon PriA and PriB...17 Figure 6: Structure of the Inhibitor F0359-0046………………………………….18 Figure 7a: Average data of the effect of F0359-0046 on N. gon PriA …………..19 Figure 7b: Average data of the effect of F0359-0046 on N. gon PriA and PriB…19 Figure 8: Structure of the Inhibitor F0683-0441………………………………….20 Figure 9: Average data of the effect of F0683-0441 on N. gonorrhoeae PriA ….21 Figure 10: Data showing the effect of F0683-0441 on intact DNA ……………..22 ix Figure 11: Structure of the Inhibitor F2018-1489 ………………………………..22 Figure 12: Data showing the effect of F2018-1489 on N. gon PriA……………...23 Figure 13: Data showing the effect of F2018-1489 intact DNA ………………...24 Figure 14: Structure of the Inhibitor F0683-0207 ………………………………...24 Figure 15a: Average data of the effect of F0683-0207 on N. gon PriA….………25 Figure 15b: Average data of the effect of F0683-0207 on N. gon PriA and PriB..25 Figure 16: DNA titrations…………………………………………………………29 Figure 17: ATP titrations ………………….………………………………………31 Figure 18: Plot displaying the effect of inhibitor F0683-0207 on E. coli PriA …...33 Figure 19: Plot displaying the growth rate of E. coli ……………………………...34 Figure 20: Tray setup for Hampton Crystal Screen ………………………………..36 Figure 21: Tray setup for Hampton Crystal Screen 2. …………………………….37 Figure 22: Tray setup for Hampton Index screen .……………………………..…..39 x LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Effect of mixed inhibitor on apparent Vmax and Km values……………..29 Table 2: DNA titrations: Kinetic parameters in the presence and absence of Inhibitor F0683-0207……………………………………………...……….………30 Table 3: ATP titrations: Kinetic parameters in the presence and absence of Inhibitor F0683-0207……………………………………….……………………...31 Table 4: Hampton Crystal Screen scoring sheet …………………………………..36 Table 5: Hampton Crystal Screen 2 scoring sheet……………………..…………..37 Table 6: Hampton Index Screen scoring sheet…………………………………….38 xi CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The most essential aspect for the existence, survival and propagation of life is DNA replication and this involves the duplication of cellular genome. In bacteria, this process is continually disrupted by obstructions on the DNA template such as single stranded nicks, double stranded breaks, and oxidized bases which arise due to environmental or cellular factors1. The progress of the DNA replication machinery (replisome) is hindered by these barriers, causing it to stall or derail from the DNA template2. To ensure continuation of the DNA replication process, bacteria have evolved “DNA replication restart pathways” which reload and reactivate the DNA replisome onto a repaired DNA replication fork3. In E. coli, one of the several major pathways to activate stalled replication forks is DnaA-catalyzed origin-dependent initiation of DNA replication4 (Figure 1). This is a very carefully regulated, sequence-specific event which is catalyzed by the initiator protein, DnaA. DnaA recognizes and binds to a replication origin site and recruits the replicative helicase and the helicase loader protein, DnaB and DnaC, respectively. The replicative helicase unwinds the