DOCSLIB.ORG

What Produces a History Textbook?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

What Produces a History Textbook? The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Chughtai, Mariam. 2015. What Produces a History Textbook?. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard Graduate School of Education. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:16461056 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA What Produces a History Textbook? Mariam Chughtai Richard Elmore Mark Moore Amartya Sen A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Education of Harvard University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education 2015 © 2015 Mariam Chughtai All Rights Reserved For my father i Acknowledgements This dissertation would not have been possible without the support of my doctoral advisors, Dr. Amartya Sen, Dr. Richard Elmore and Dr. Mark Moore. Specifically, I’d like to thank Dr. Sen, for giving me confidence and intellectual courage, Dr. Elmore, for showing me how to ask the right questions, and Dr. Moore for showing me the value of perseverance. I feel profoundly honored and privileged to have been their advisee. I am especially grateful to faculty assistants, Chie Ri, Tilman Feitag, and Mary Anne Baumgartner, for making sure my committee of very senior faculty remained accessible to me. The support of my doctoral writing group from the Harvard Graduate School of Education was invaluable in sustaining me through the many milestones of the doctoral program; for this, I thank Lissa Young, Lauren Elmore, and Charles Lang. For their mentorship and guidance, I thank professors Asim Khwaja, Shahab Ahmad, Parimal Patel, Tarun Khanna, Shankar Ramaswami and Ronald Heifetz. In particular, I’d like to acknowledge Professor Ayesha Jalal, whose work on the history of the 1971 separation of East Pakistan had a profound impact on me when I was a young adult. I thank my teacher Shafqat Mahmood for teaching the course in which I first recognized my calling to study education as a political tool. For their generosity with their time and guidance I am indebted to professors Fernando Reimers, Jal Mehta, Eileen McGowen and Deborah Garsen at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, and Shabnam Khan, Fouzia Saeed, Harpreet Singh, Baela Jamil and Aneela Asghar. I am also grateful to my friends, Mustafa Samdani and Beena Sarwar for refining the arguments and editing the final manuscript, respectively. For research support in data collection, I thank Aurangzeb Malik, librarian at the Punjab Textbook Board (PTB), Rehana Kausar, librarian at the Chughtai Public Library, Haji Hattar, librarian at the Library of the National Assembly, and Muhammad Usman who helped me collect old textbooks. I would also like to express my gratitude to the leadership at the Punjab Textbook Board, specifically, former chairman Shahid Ahmad Bhutta, and Finance Director Muhammad Asif, as without their support I could not have gained certain fundamental insights. I would also like to thank Sir Michael Barber ii for connecting me with the Punjab Textbook Board. I thank former PTB chairpersons Shaikh Izhar Ahmed and Dr. Fouzia Saleemi for sharing their valuable experiences. Finally, I thank the staff at Punjab Textbook Board who trusted me and candidly shared some of the most controversial aspects of making textbooks in Punjab. I am very grateful to the Jack Kent Cooke Foundation for six years of financial support. I am also thankful to the Harvard South Asia Institute for selecting me as a Graduate Student Associate (GSA) three years in a row. Some of the most transformative conversations for the ideas expressed in this dissertation came from colleagues in the GSA program, and the larger community of doctoral students studying South Asia. In particular I am thankful to Lydia Walker, Bilal Ahsan Malik and Mircea Raianu. As a young child I heard my mother say, people who do not learn from their history their geography changes. I am thankful to her for showing me that it was not about knowing the answer to every question but learning to question every answer. I am grateful to my siblings, Omar, Reem and Ali, siblings-in-law, Faisal and Sarah, and uncle Terry Shaikh for keeping me anchored every step of the way. My nephews and niece, Aahil, Maaz and Sadia, who kept the child in me alive through this difficult journey. Expressing gratitude to my father seems out of place because, in many ways, we did this dissertation together; in some ways I did this PhD for him. My dearest friend, Dr. Stephen Pierrel (late) would have been proud to see me graduate today; his parting words to me read, A reminder – celebrating transformation, freedom, struggle, new beauty. You have come a long way. Congratulations. – Dr. P. (March 9th, 2006) iii Table of Contents CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 History as an Instrument of Government Power ................................................................... 2 Research Question ............................................................................................................................ 3 Religious Political Extremism and Religious Fundamentalism ........................................ 3 Hypothesis ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Roadmap .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Three Bodies of Data: A Multidimensional Picture ............................................................... 8 Location in Current Research .................................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER II. EDUCATION POLICIES ................................................................................ 12 Variable 1: Religious ideology ................................................................................................... 12 Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 14 Analysis ............................................................................................................................................. 16 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................ 61 CHAPTER III. HISTORY TEXTBOOKS .............................................................................. 62 Variables 2 and 3: Identity Politics and Military Revisionism ........................................ 62 Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 64 Analysis ............................................................................................................................................. 72 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................... 115 CHAPTER IV. THE POLITICS OF MAKING TEXTBOOKS ......................................... 117 Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 117 Roadmap ......................................................................................................................................... 125 Textbook Beltway ........................................................................................................................ 126 Changes After the 18th Amendment to the Constitution ................................................. 129 Variable 4: Political Power ....................................................................................................... 130 Kingdon’s Model of Agenda Formation ................................................................................. 136 2002 Curriculum: A Case Study in Agenda Formation .................................................... 141 2006 Curriculum: Additional aspects to Agenda Formation ......................................... 150 Variable 5: Financial vulnerabilities ..................................................................................... 166 Variable 6: Systemic Inefficiencies ......................................................................................... 181 Variable 7: Past History Textbooks ....................................................................................... 187 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................... 199 CHAPTER V. SUMMARY AND IMPLICATIONS ............................................................ 200 Summary of Findings .................................................................................................................. 200 Implications ................................................................................................................................... 203 Future Research ..........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Defining Shariʿa the Politics of Islamic Judicial Review by Shoaib

    Defining Shariʿa the Politics of Islamic Judicial Review by Shoaib

    Defining Shariʿa The Politics of Islamic Judicial Review By Shoaib A. Ghias A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Malcolm M. Feeley, Chair Professor Martin M. Shapiro Professor Asad Q. Ahmed Summer 2015 Defining Shariʿa The Politics of Islamic Judicial Review © 2015 By Shoaib A. Ghias Abstract Defining Shariʿa: The Politics of Islamic Judicial Review by Shoaib A. Ghias Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy University of California, Berkeley Professor Malcolm M. Feeley, Chair Since the Islamic resurgence of the 1970s, many Muslim postcolonial countries have established and empowered constitutional courts to declare laws conflicting with shariʿa as unconstitutional. The central question explored in this dissertation is whether and to what extent constitutional doctrine developed in shariʿa review is contingent on the ruling regime or represents lasting trends in interpretations of shariʿa. Using the case of Pakistan, this dissertation contends that the long-term discursive trends in shariʿa are determined in the religio-political space and only reflected in state law through the interaction of shariʿa politics, regime politics, and judicial politics. The research is based on materials gathered during fieldwork in Pakistan and datasets of Federal Shariat Court and Supreme Court cases and judges. In particular, the dissertation offers a political-institutional framework to study shariʿa review in a British postcolonial court system through exploring the role of professional and scholar judges, the discretion of the chief justice, the system of judicial appointments and tenure, and the political structure of appeal that combine to make courts agents of the political regime.
  • Ucd-2005 (Deposits List)

    Ucd-2005 (Deposits List)

    NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN UN-CLAIMED DEPOSITS-2005 EMPLOYEES BENEFITS, DISBURSEMENTS TRUSTEES DIVISION Amount Nature of reported Name of Account in form XI Amount Branch Province where Account current,s FOR THE Name of Branch Name Address transferred to Code Branch is No. aving, YEAR SBP located fixed or ENDED other 31 Dec. 2004 2 MAIN BRANCH KARACHI. SIND 26369-7 Karachi 1 200.00 OTHERS 2 MAIN BRANCH KARACHI. SIND 3234-5 Karachi 2 1000.00 OTHERS 2 MAIN BRANCH KARACHI. SIND 0966-1 Karachi 3 1710.00 OTHERS 2 MAIN BRANCH KARACHI. SIND 2116 Karachi 4 100.00 OTHERS 2 MAIN BRANCH KARACHI. SIND 8525-2 Karachi 5 250.57 OTHERS 2 MAIN BRANCH KARACHI. SIND 9661 Karachi 6 620.00 OTHERS 2 MAIN BRANCH KARACHI. SIND 00623-4 Karachi 7 1643.20 OTHERS 2 MAIN BRANCH KARACHI. SIND 18348 Karachi 8 500.00 OTHERS 2 MAIN BRANCH KARACHI. SIND 13345 Karachi 9 2500.00 OTHERS 2 MAIN BRANCH KARACHI. SIND 7086224 Karachi 10 150.00 OTHERS 2 MAIN BRANCH KARACHI. SIND TRV 10067-10840 MASOOD 7086-Karachi 11 2250.00 OTHERS 2 MAIN BRANCH KARACHI. SIND CREDIT TO SUNDY DEPOSIT Karachi 12 28.00 OTHERS 2 MAIN BRANCH KARACHI. SIND KHILIL HAMID Karachi 13 200.00 OTHERS 2 MAIN BRANCH KARACHI. SIND 05322 Karachi 14 1000.00 OTHERS 2 MAIN BRANCH KARACHI. SIND ISMAIL Karachi 15 50.00 OTHERS 2 MAIN BRANCH KARACHI. SIND ASAD 8021 Karachi 16 9.35 OTHERS 2 MAIN BRANCH KARACHI. SIND ASAD 8021 Karachi 17 3.74 OTHERS 2 MAIN BRANCH KARACHI.
  • In Pakistan Salman Hussain the Graduate Center, City University of New York

    In Pakistan Salman Hussain the Graduate Center, City University of New York

    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Graduate Center 2-2018 Together Without Consensus: Class, Emotions and the Politics of the Rule of Law in the Lawyers’ Movement (2007-09) in Pakistan Salman Hussain The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Follow this and additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Hussain, Salman, "Together Without Consensus: Class, Emotions and the Politics of the Rule of Law in the Lawyers’ Movement (2007-09) in Pakistan" (2018). CUNY Academic Works. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2489 This Dissertation is brought to you by CUNY Academic Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of CUNY Academic Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TOGETHER WITHOUT CONSENSUS: CLASS, EMOTIONS AND THE POLITICS OF THE RULE OF LAW IN THE LAWYERS’ MOVEMENT (2007-09) IN PAKISTAN by SALMAN HUSSAIN A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Anthropology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, City University of New York. 2018 © 2018 Salman Hussain All Rights Reserved ii Together Without Consensus: Class, Emotions and the Politics of the Rule of Law in the Lawyers’ Movement (2007-09) in Pakistan by Salman Hussain This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Anthropology in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
  • USPCAS-E Final Project Report, 2014-2019

    USPCAS-E Final Project Report, 2014-2019

    Cooperative Agreement FINAL No: AID-391-A-15-00001 REPORT 2014 – 2019 U.S.-Pakistan Centers for Advanced Studies in Energy 2 U.S.-PAKISTAN CENTERS FOR ADVANCED STUDIES IN ENERGY Fortunately, I was able to secure the USAID scholarship Muneeza so I could focus on my education without having to Ahmad worry about money. Even as a young girl, Muneeza “They used to say girls were not “I had been thinking about getting Ahmad always enjoyed science and cut out for engineering and will a master’s degree for some time mathematics, so when it was time not contribute to the field in the but due to the financial burden of for college, engineering seemed future. But I had the support of my my siblings’ education, I couldn’t like the best fit. teachers and was able to convince ask my parents to pay for me. I “I like to solve problems and look at them with my performance in the saved up for a year to cover the things from new perspectives.” classroom and lab,” Muneeza says. application fee, first-semester Muneeza was working at a tuition fees and hostel rent for But Muneeza faced skepticism my master’s program. Fortunately, from her classmates about her manufacturing supply firm in Lahore when she heard about I was able to secure the USAID decision to pursue engineering. scholarship so I could focus on my Around the world, people still have the Center for Advanced Study in Energy at NUST, but it was a long education without having to worry a hard time picturing about money.” women when they hear the journey that involved saving enough word “engineer.” money to pay the fees.
  • The Murder of History in Pakistan by K

    The Murder of History in Pakistan by K

    The Murder of History in Pakistan by K. K. AZIZ Reproduced by Sani H. Panhwar THE MURDER OF HISTORY IN PAKISTAN A critique of history textbooks used in Pakistan K.K. Aziz Reproduced by Sani H. Panhwar To the late Uncle Hakim Jan of blessed memory More than a brother to my father, a benefactor of my family, whose mind, lit by the flame of virtue, was a miracle of equilibrium CONTENTS Preface .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 1 The Prescribed Myths .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 8 2 The Calamity of Errors .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 106 3 The Road to Ruin .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 152 4 The Burden of Responsibility .. .. .. .. .. .. 198 Appendix — A .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 213 Appendix — B .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 214 Appendix — C .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 223 PREFACE In this book I have scrutinized 66 textbooks on Social Studies, Pakistan Studies and History in use in the schools and colleges of Pakistan by students of classes 1 to 14, discussed their contents at full length, and explored the dimensions. implications and ramifications of their errors, faults and deficiencies. This study has taken its rise from a series of adventitious circumstances, not all agreeable or gratifying. In 1989-90 I wrote a book on the Pakistani historian which contained one chapter of 82 pages. the longest of all, on the textbooks written by the historians of the country and in use in the schools and colleges. (The book has since been published by Vanguard under the title of The Pakistani Historian, and I advise the reader to look through it to understand why such books have been written by the country's historians). The typescript was handed over to a Lahore publisher on 25 March 1990, and two weeks later I went away to Cambridge for an 8-month spell of teaching and writing.