European Parliament

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

European Parliament EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ««« « « « « 1999 « « 2004 ««« Session document FINAL A5-0190/2002 Par1 24 May 2002 REPORT on the state of enlargement negotiations (COM(2001) 700 – C5-0024/2002 – 2002/2023(COS)) Part 1: Motion for a resolution Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy Rapporteur: Elmar Brok Co-rapporteurs: Jacques F. Poos, Jürgen Schröder, Gunilla Carlsson, Luís Queiró, Elisabeth Schroedter, Ioannis Souladakis, Ursula Stenzel, Jas Gawronski, Jan Marinus Wiersma, Demetrio Volcic, Geoffrey Van Orden, Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne RR\469983EN.doc PE 309.662 EN EN PE 309.662 2/129 RR\469983EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page PROCEDURAL PAGE ..............................................................................................................4 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION .............................................................................................6 Countries aiming at accession in 2004.................................................................................10 Cyprus (Jacques F. Poos)......................................................................................................10 Czech Republic (Jürgen Schröder) .......................................................................................12 Estonia (Gunilla Carlsson)....................................................................................................13 Hungary (Luís Queiró) .........................................................................................................15 Latvia (Elisabeth Schroedter) ...............................................................................................16 Lithuania (Ioannis Souladakis).............................................................................................18 Malta (Ursula Stenzel)..........................................................................................................20 Poland (Jas Gawronski)........................................................................................................21 Slovakia (Jan Marinus Wiersma) .........................................................................................23 Slovenia (Demetrio Volcic)..................................................................................................25 Countries aiming at accession after 2004 ............................................................................26 Bulgaria (Geoffrey Van Orden)............................................................................................26 Romania (Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne) ................................................................28 Published separately: EXPLANATORY STATEMENT........................................................ (Part 2 – A5-0190/2002) OPINIONS OF THE OTHER COMMITTEES .................................. (Part 3 – A5-0190/2002) RR\469983EN.doc 3/129 PE 309.662 EN PROCEDURAL PAGE By letter of 15 November 2001, the Commission forwarded to Parliament its Strategy Paper and Report on the progress towards accession by each of the candidate countries (COM(2001) 700 – 2002/2023(COS)). At the sitting of 4 February 2002 the President of Parliament announced that he had referred this report to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy as the committee responsible and to all committees concerned for their opinions (C5-0024/2002). The Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy had appointed Elmar Brok rapporteur at its meeting of 12 December 2001. At the same meeting, it confirmed the appointment of co-rapporteurs Jacques F. Poos (Cyprus), Jürgen Schröder (Czech Republic), Gunilla Carlsson (Estonia), Luís Queiró (Hungary), Elisabeth Schroedter (Latvia), Ioannis Souladakis (Lithuania), Ursula Stenzel (Malta), Jas Gawronski (Poland), Jan Marinus Wiersma (Slovakia), Demetrio Volcic (Slovenia), Geoffrey Van Orden (Bulgaria), and Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne (Romania). The committee considered the draft report at its meetings of 25 March and 21-22 May 2002. At the latter meeting it adopted the motion unanimously. The following were present for the vote: Elmar Brok, chairman and rapporteur, Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne (co-rapporteur), Geoffrey Van Orden (co-rapporteur), and Christos Zacharakis, vice-chairmen; Alexandros Baltas, Bastiaan Belder, Gunilla Carlsson (co-rapporteur), Michael Cashman (for Sami Naïr), Daniel Marc Cohn-Bendit, Paul Coûteaux, Rosa M. Díez González, Andrew Nicholas Duff (for Ole Andreasen), Pernille Frahm (for André Brie), Michael Gahler, Gerardo Galeote Quecedo, Jas Gawronski (co- rapporteur), Vitaliano Gemelli (for John Walls Cushnahan), José María Gil-Robles Gil- Delgado (for Alain Lamassoure pursuant to Rule 153(2)), Alfred Gomolka, Vasco Graça Moura (for Franco Marini), Ulpu Iivari (for Magdalene Hoff), Giorgos Katiforis (for Glyn Ford), Joost Lagendijk, Catherine Lalumière, Armin Laschet, Jules Maaten (for Claudio Martelli), Cecilia Malmström, Pedro Marset Campos, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez (for Véronique De Keyser), Linda McAvan, Emilio Menéndez del Valle, Philippe Morillon, Pasqualina Napoletano, Arie M. Oostlander, Doris Pack (for José Pacheco Pereira), Jacques F. Poos (co-rapporteur), Luís Queiró (co-rapporteur), Jacques Santer, Amalia Sartori, Jürgen Schröder (co-rapporteur), Elisabeth Schroedter (co-rapporteur), Ioannis Souladakis (co- rapporteur), Ursula Stenzel (co-rapporteur), David Sumberg, Ilkka Suominen, Hannes Swoboda, Charles Tannock, Maj Britt Theorin (for Klaus Hänsch), Antonios Trakatellis (for José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra), Bob van den Bos, Johan Van Hecke, Paavo Väyrynen, Luigi Vinci, Demetrio Volcic (co-rapporteur), Karl von Wogau, Jan Marinus Wiersma (co-rapporteur), and Matti Wuori. The explanatory statement will be published separately (Part 2 – A5-0190/2002). PE 309.662 4/129 RR\469983EN.doc EN The opinions of the Committees on Budgetary Control, on Citizens’ Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs, on Economic and Monetary Affairs, on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market, on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy, on Employment and Social Affairs, on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy, on Agriculture and Rural Development, on Fisheries, on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism, on Culture, Youth, Education, the Media and Sport, on Women’s Rights and Equal Opportunities, and on Petitions will be published separately (Part 3 – A5-0190/2002). The report was tabled on 24 May 2002. The deadline for tabling amendments will be indicated in the draft agenda for the relevant part-session. RR\469983EN.doc 5/129 PE 309.662 EN MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION European Parliament resolution on the state of enlargement negotiations (COM(2001) 700 – C5-0024/2002 – 2002/2023(COS)) The European Parliament, – having regard to the Commission’s Strategy Paper and Report (COM(2001) 700 – C5-0024/2002), – having regard to the conclusions of the Laeken European Council in December 2001, – having regard to its previous resolutions and reports since the start of the accession negotiations, – having regard to the Mendez De Vigo-Seguro report on the Treaty of Nice and the future of the European Union1 and the Mendez De Vigo-Leinen report on the future of the Union2, – having regard to Rule 47(1) of its Rules of Procedure, – having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy and the opinions of the Committees on Budgetary Control, on Citizens’ Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs, on Economic and Monetary Affairs, on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market, on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy, on Employment and Social Affairs, on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy, on Agriculture and Rural Development, on Fisheries, on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism, on Culture, Youth, Education, the Media and Sport, on Women’s Rights and Equal Opportunities, and on Petitions (A5-0190/2002), A. whereas this report aims to encourage the Commission, the Member States and the candidate countries to accomplish their tasks during this crucial year of the accession process, 1. Underlines the fact that the enlargement of the European Union is a historical necessity for the peoples of Europe in order to make peaceful and prosperous coexistence possible on the European continent and to ensure further economic and social progress; considers that the elaborate and steady process of reforms undertaken by the candidate countries and supported by the EU’s pre-accession strategy has demonstrated its positive effect for the stability of the whole continent; 1 Adopted on 31 May 2001. 2 Adopted on 29 November 2001. PE 309.662 6/129 RR\469983EN.doc EN 2. Points out that accession ascribes to the new Member States a high degree of political responsibility for the future of the EU and the world and that all Member States – both old and new – must be aware that modes of behaviour dating from the last century and from the one before that must not be extrapolated into the future; feels sure that the wounds of many historic disputes can be healed by enlargement of the EU and that the various peoples will involve themselves in the common construction of the new European house, in order to guarantee a durable peace, the common values and the welfare of the people of Europe; 3. Is of the firm conviction that, as in the case of previous accessions, differing views about historic events do not constitute a barrier to accession but
Recommended publications
  • List of Members
    Special Committee on Terrorism Members Nathalie GRIESBECK Chair Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe France Mouvement Démocrate Elena VALENCIANO Vice-Chair Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Spain Partido Socialista Obrero Español Judith SARGENTINI Vice-Chair Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance Netherlands GroenLinks Jeroen LENAERS Vice-Chair Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Netherlands Christen Democratisch Appèl Geoffrey VAN ORDEN Vice-Chair European Conservatives and Reformists Group United Kingdom Conservative Party Heinz K. BECKER Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Austria Österreichische Volkspartei Ivo BELET Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Belgium Christen-Democratisch & Vlaams Caterina CHINNICI Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Italy Partito Democratico Anna Maria CORAZZA BILDT Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Sweden Moderaterna Javier COUSO PERMUY Member Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left Spain Independiente 27/09/2021 1 Edward CZESAK Member European Conservatives and Reformists Group Poland Prawo i Sprawiedliwość Arnaud DANJEAN Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) France Les Républicains Gérard DEPREZ Member Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Belgium Mouvement Réformateur Agustín
    [Show full text]
  • ROMA and LUXEMBOURGERS There Are People Who Love And
    ROMA AND LUXEMBOURGERS There are people who love and people who hate Europe. I happen to be a fan. The European Union ended wars, queuing up for the customs and it gave a voice to even the smallest member-states, like Luxemburg with 500.000 residents. Yet millions of other EU citizens have no say in the matter, no Commissioner of their own and no MEPs in Brussels, for the mere reason that they are an ethnic minority, like Roma and Sinti, Europe's largest minority. Why double standards? Is it because Luxembourgers are all white and Roma all dark? They are not. Thousand years ago, Roma left India and went to Russia, Persia, Turkey and Europe. Some intermarried with Jews and other non-Roma, or they lost their tan in Scandinavian countries. Even the Nazis noticed that racial purity is a difficult thing. They decided that 12.5 % of Roma or Jewish blood was enough to be deported. Gadje, non-Roma, also have mixed blood. New archeological findings reveal that only 10 up to 20 % of Europeans descend from the original tribes, the others have DNA from the Middle East or Asia. The major difference between Luxembourgers and Roma does not stem from ethnicity but from something that used to be very important in Europe: borders. Luxembourgers have them, Roma don't. The political relevance of the term "ethnic minority" is rather dubious. It means counting people in, not seldom to count them out. The reunification of Europe has deprived a whole nation from fundamental rights and this mainly happened because the 12 million Roma, present in larger numbers than Belgians, Swedes, Finns, Bulgarians, Czechs, Greeks, Danish, or Luxembourgers, did not live together in their own nation-state.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2000-2001
    europe activity 8 Oct. 2000 - 23 Oct. 2001 ilga report www.ilga-europe.org europe activity ilga report THANKS & ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank everybody who HIVOS (the Netherlands), Homosexuelle supported the work of the Board over the Selbsthilfe e. V. (Germany), and the City of last twelve months. Without the commit- Rotterdam for generously funding specific ment and donations of many people and projects and activities of ILGA-Europe; the financial and other support of many (member) organisations this work would ◗ Homosexuelle Initiative (HOSI) Wien not have been possible. We cannot mention (Austria), UNISON, the public sector them all here but special thanks have to go union in the United Kingdom, and Fede- to the following: ratie Werkgroepen Homoseksualiteit (Bel- gium) for substantial financial contribu- ◗ Steffen Jensen who, as outgoing treasurer, tions to our work; The European Region of the continued to take care of ILGA-Europe’s International Lesbian and Gay finances and accounts until the end of the ◗ the European Commission for granting us Association calendar year 2000. Together with other core funding and its anti-discrimination activists of the Danish national gay and unit for the good co-operation; Avenue de Tervueren/ lesbian association LBL he also continued Tervurenlaan 94/1 to publish the Euro-Letter on behalf of ◗ MEPs Michael Cashman, Joke Swiebel, B-1040 Brussels ILGA-Europe, and on top of that Patsy Sörensen, Lousewies van der Laan, phone +32 2 732 54 88 remained in charge of our web-site; and Baroness
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal C 174 E Volume 44 of the European Communities 19 June 2001
    ISSN 0378-6986 Official Journal C 174 E Volume 44 of the European Communities 19 June 2001 English edition Information and Notices Notice No Contents Page I (Information) EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT WRITTEN QUESTIONS WITH ANSWER (2001/C 174 E/001) P-2575/99 by Alexandros Alavanos to the Commission Subject: Lack of infrastructures and facilities at Patras Port (Supplementary Answer) ................. 1 (2001/C 174 E/002) E-2783/99 by Alexandros Alavanos to the Commission Subject: Shortcomings of public works in Greece (Supplementary Answer) ....................... 2 (2001/C 174 E/003) E-0951/00 by Bart Staes to the Commission Subject: The Objective 2 region of Hainaut (Supplementary Answer) .......................... 3 (2001/C 174 E/004) E-2666/00 by Elly Plooij-van Gorsel to the Commission Subject: Safety of nuclear power stations in the applicant countries ........................... 5 (2001/C 174 E/005) E-2682/00 by Matti Wuori to the Commission Subject: Nuclear safety Temelin power station ..................................... 6 (2001/C 174 E/006) E-2736/00 by Charles Tannock to the Commission Subject: Consistency in the application of the precautionary principle ......................... 7 (2001/C 174 E/007) E-2743/00 by Monica Frassoni to the Commission Subject: Sewage plant in Sarroch, Sardinia (Supplementary Answer) ........................... 8 (2001/C 174 E/008) E-2776/00 by Avril Doyle to the Council Subject: Torture in Turkish prisons ............................................. 9 (2001/C 174 E/009) E-2795/00 by Lord Inglewood to the Commission Subject: Top rate of tax on personal incomes in each country of the European Union ................ 10 (2001/C 174 E/010) E-2796/00 by Lord Inglewood to the Commission Subject: Top rate of personal inheritance tax in each country of the European Union ...............
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2014
    European Parliament Elections 2014 Updated 12 March 2014 Overview of Candidates in the United Kingdom Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 CANDIDATE SELECTION PROCESS ............................................................................................. 2 3.0 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS: VOTING METHOD IN THE UK ................................................................ 3 4.0 PRELIMINARY OVERVIEW OF CANDIDATES BY UK CONSTITUENCY ............................................ 3 5.0 ANNEX: LIST OF SITTING UK MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ................................ 16 6.0 ABOUT US ............................................................................................................................. 17 All images used in this briefing are © Barryob / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-3.0 / GFDL © DeHavilland EU Ltd 2014. All rights reserved. 1 | 18 European Parliament Elections 2014 1.0 Introduction This briefing is part of DeHavilland EU’s Foresight Report series on the 2014 European elections and provides a preliminary overview of the candidates standing in the UK for election to the European Parliament in 2014. In the United Kingdom, the election for the country’s 73 Members of the European Parliament will be held on Thursday 22 May 2014. The elections come at a crucial junction for UK-EU relations, and are likely to have far-reaching consequences for the UK’s relationship with the rest of Europe: a surge in support for the UK Independence Party (UKIP) could lead to a Britain that is increasingly dis-engaged from the EU policy-making process. In parallel, the current UK Government is also conducting a review of the EU’s powers and Prime Minister David Cameron has repeatedly pushed for a ‘repatriation’ of powers from the European to the national level. These long-term political developments aside, the elections will also have more direct and tangible consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Members
    Subcommittee on Security and Defence Members Anna FOTYGA Chair European Conservatives and Reformists Group Poland Prawo i Sprawiedliwość Christian EHLER Vice-Chair Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Germany Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands Jaromír ŠTĚTINA Vice-Chair Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Czechia TOP 09 a Starostové Clare MOODY Vice-Chair Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament United Kingdom Labour Party Sabine LÖSING Vice-Chair Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left Germany DIE LINKE. Laima Liucija ANDRIKIENĖ Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Lithuania Tėvynės sąjunga-Lietuvos krikščionys demokratai Johannes Cornelis VAN BAALEN Member Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Netherlands Volkspartij voor Vrijheid en Democratie Brando BENIFEI Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Italy Partito Democratico Klaus BUCHNER Member Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance Germany Ökologisch-Demokratische Partei Jerzy BUZEK Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Poland Platforma Obywatelska 30/09/2021 1 Aymeric CHAUPRADE Member Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy Group France Les Français Libres Javier COUSO PERMUY Member Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left Spain Independiente Arnaud DANJEAN Member Group of the European People's Party
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2001 Lesbian/Gay Law Project Partners Will Have to Relevant Web-Sites: Notes, Usa/Legal/Lgln
    europe news Vol. 1, issue 2, August 2001 ilga letter www.ilga-europe.org Belgrade Gay Pride Activists under attack Photo: Associated Press First row: Claudia Roth; second row, left: Lousewies van der Laan, David Geer and Hein Verkerk; right: Mette Vadstrup, Michael Cashman and Joke Swiebel LGBT “embassy” opened On 27 June 2001, the new ILGA- many friends and supporters Verkerk und David Geer. And attend our opening party. Since Europe office in Brussels, rent- from the Platform of European Griffith Vaughan Williams, who her groundbreaking 1994 EP ed and in use already since Social NGOs and its member made the journey from London report “on equal rights for February, was finally opened organisations, but also from just for these two occasions. homosexuals and lesbians in officially. Around 80 people fol- Human Rights Watch. And of Other ILGA veterans such as the EC” she has become some- lowed the invitation, and at the course many lesbian and gay Hartmut Schönknecht and Ernst thing like an “icon” for the peak of the party, our 70 square activists showed up. We were Strohmeyer travelled extra from European LGBT movement. She metres at Tervurenlaan 94 got glad to welcome former ILGA Germany and Austria to take gave a short speech emphasis- quite packed. Members of the secretary-general Inge Wallaert, part in these events. Hilde ing the great achievement that European Parliament – Joke Tom Hoemig, administrator of Vossen, chair of the Dutch the opening of this “embassy of Swiebel, Lousewies van der the ILGA World office, Bernard Bisexual Network that had just LGBT people in Brussels” is Laan and Michael Cashman, Lonnoy from EGALITE, all the organised the first European after all the years of struggle who also made a short speech – representatives from the move- bisexuals conference in Rotter- and lobbying.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards an Eu Strategy for Collective Security
    THE TRANSATLANTIC SOLUTION FOR NATO AGS EADS · GALILEO AVIONICA · GENERAL DYNAMICS CANADA · INDRA · NORTHROP GRUMMAN · THALES TOWARDS AN EU STRATEGY FOR COLLECTIVE SECURITY With media support from An international one day conference organized by the New Defence Agenda, EADS, TIPS and the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung. Towards an EU Strategy for Collective Security 3 February 2005, Palais d’Egmont, Brussels I am EADS My name is Aurora del Castillo. I’m in charge of Integrated Logistics Support for military aircraft at EADS CASA, the Spanish partner in the Eurofighter programme. A modern air force isn’t just aircraft, but a complex package of logistics services that range from pilot training and flight simulators to spare parts. My role is to liaise with senior officers from customers’ air forces, determine their needs and ensure these are fulfilled. I remain their key contact long after the aircraft has been delivered. I’m Spanish and European. I’m a woman in what is no longer a man’s world. I am EADS. www.eads.com AIRBUS EUROCOPTER EUROFIGHTER A400M METEOR GALILEO ARIANE The views expressed in this Report are personal opinions and not necessarily the views of the organisations they represent, nor of the New Defence Agenda, its members or sponsors. Contents Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted, providing that full attribution is made to the New Defence Agenda and INTRODUCTION 5 to the source(s) in question, and provided that any such reproduction, whether in whole or in part, is not sold unless Giles Merritt, Director, New Defence Agenda incorporated in other works.
    [Show full text]
  • A5-0206/2004
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT GGG G G G G 1999 G G 2004 G G G Session document FINAL A5-0206/2004 22 March 2004 REPORT containing a proposal for a European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the application by Croatia for accession to the European Union 2003/2254(INI)) Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy Rapporteur: Alexandros Baltas RR\529809EN.doc PE 329.364 EN EN PE 329.364 2/15 RR\529809EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page PROCEDURAL PAGE.............................................................................................................. 4 PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL .................................................................................................................................. 5 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT............................................................................................ 11 PROPOSAL FOR A RECOMMENDATION B5-0476/2003 ................................................. 14 RR\529809EN.doc 3/15 PE 329.364 EN PROCEDURAL PAGE At the sitting of 17 November 2003 the President of Parliament announced that he had referred the proposal for a recommendation on the application of Croatia for accession to the EU (B5-0476/2003), tabled by Alexandros Baltas on behalf of the PSE Group pursuant to Rule 49(1) of the Rules of Procedure, to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy as the committee responsible. At its meeting of 26 November 2003 the committee decided to draw up a report on the subject
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Audit: European Elections 2019: What Will Happen in the East of England Region? Page 1 of 6
    Democratic Audit: European elections 2019: what will happen in the East of England region? Page 1 of 6 European elections 2019: what will happen in the East of England region? Traditionally this is a Conservative region at Westminster elections. Yet the East of England is strongly Eurosceptic and UKIP came top here in the last European Parliament elections in 2014, although the Tories hung on (just) to three seats. The Brexit Party now look certain to take over the UKIP vote and comfortably come first: on current polls they are guaranteed three of the region’s seven seats, and possibly one more. The latest polling indicates that Labour and the Liberal Democrats look assured of a single seat each. So the main uncertainty hangs on just how dominant the Brexit Party vote will be, whether the Tories’ slump means that they lose all of their seats here, and whether the Greens can pick up a seat. With voters able to cast only a single vote for a party list, the Democratic Audit team reviews likely outcomes for the parties and the main potentially electable candidates. Norwich cathedral. Picture: MemoryCatcher / 3041 images The East of England region juts into the North Sea and covers East Anglia down to the northern fringes of London. People here voted 56.5% to 43.5% for Leave in the Brexit referendum. Yet the area also includes some anti-Brexit cities such as Norwich and Cambridge. Last time UKIP won 35% of the vote and gained three MEPs (two of whom subsequently defected to other parties).
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union Symbols and Their Adoption by the European Parliament
    The European Union Symbols and their Adoption by the European Parliament Standard Note: SN/IA/4874 Last updated: 22 October 2008 Author: Vaughne Miller Section International Affairs and Defence Section This Note considers the symbols traditionally used by the European Union institutions and the recent formal adoption of them by the European Parliament. This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual. It should not be relied upon as being up to date; the law or policies may have changed since it was last updated; and it should not be relied upon as legal or professional advice or as a substitute for it. A suitably qualified professional should be consulted if specific advice or information is required. This information is provided subject to our general terms and conditions which are available online or may be provided on request in hard copy. Authors are available to discuss the content of this briefing with Members and their staff, but not with the general public. Contents 1 The Symbols of the EU 3 1.1 Flag 3 1.2 Anthem 4 1.3 Europe Day 4 1.4 Motto 5 1.5 Euro 5 2 Attempts to formalise the symbols through Treaty change 6 2.1 The Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe 6 2.2 The Treaty of Lisbon 6 3 European Parliament amendment to Rules of Procedure 7 3.1 Constitutional Affairs Committee report 7 3.2 The Plenary adopts the symbols 7 4 Implications and reaction 9 2 1 The Symbols of the EU The process for the adoption of the EU single currency in three stages was enshrined in the 1991 Treaty on European Union (Maastricht Treaty), although the aim of economic and monetary union (EMU) had been acknowledged at the 1969 European Council summit at The Hague.1 The EU flag, anthem and Europe Day were adopted by the European Council in Milan in 1985, while the “United in Diversity” motto was adopted in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 0 1 8 a N N U a L R E P O
    A N N U A L R E P O R T R E P O R T B Y 2 0 1 8 T H E A T L A N T I C T R E A T Y A S S O C I A T I O N A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 A publication of Atlantic Treaty Association Club Prince Albert Rue des Petits Carmes, 20-24 B- 1000 Bruxelles Tel: +32 2 502 31 60 Email: [email protected] Web: www.atahq.org 1 CONTENTS MISSION & VISION FOREWORDS ATA President ATA Secretary General NATO PUBLICATION GENERAL ASSEMBLY BUCHAREST ATA MEMBERS Albania Italy Armenia Lithuania Austria Montenegro Azerbaijan Netherlands Bosnia & Herzegovina North Macedonia Bulgaria Norway Canada Portugal Croatia Romania Estonia Serbia Georgia Slovakia Germany Slovenia Greece Spain Hungary Ukraine Iceland United States (US) Israel 2 MISSION & VISION The Atlantic Treaty Association (ATA) is an organization of 37 national chapters that, since 1954, has been conducting research, analyses, training, education, and information activities on foreign policy, security and defense issues relevant to the Atlantic Alliance. Relying on its extended and highly qualified network, ATA produces top- notch knowledge on strategic themes and promotes a variety of programs and events. ATA initiatives draw together government and institutional authorities, political leaders, decision-makers, diplomats, civilian and military officers, academics, economic actors, media representatives, as well as young professionals and researchers, in an effort to further a cooperative approach to security and international relations. 3 ATA has established cooperation programs with likeminded organizations in countries of the NATO Partnership for Peace, Mediterranean Dialogue and Istanbul Cooperation Initiative.
    [Show full text]