DOCSLIB.ORG

Improvements for Operational Performance in Baggage Handling Systems Regarding Mishandled Baggage Author: V

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FACULTY OF MECHANICAL, MARITIME AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING Delft University of Technology Department of Marine and Transport Technology Mekelweg 2 2628 CD Delft the Netherlands Phone +31 (0)15-2782889 Fax +31 (0)15-2781397 www.mtt.tudelft.nl Specialization: Transport Engineering and Logistics Report number: 2016.TEL.8072 Title: Improvements for Operational Performance in Baggage Handling Systems regarding Mishandled Baggage Author: V. Groeneweg Title (in Dutch) Verbeteringen voor operationele prestatie van bagage systemen met betrekking tot verkeerd afgehandelde bagage Assignment: literature Confidential: no Supervisor: Dr. Ir. Y. Pang Date: Nov. 28, 2016 This report consists of 62 pages. It may only be reproduced literally and as a whole. For commercial purposes only with written authorization of Delft University of Technology. Requests for consult are only taken into consideration under the condition that the applicant denies all legal rights on liabilities concerning the contents of the advice. FACULTY OF MECHANICAL, MARITIME AND TUDelft MATERIALS ENGINEERING Delft University of Technology Department of Marine and Transport Technology Mekelweg 2 2628 CD Delft the Netherlands Phone +31 (0)15-2782889 Fax +31 (0)15-2781397 www.mtt.tudelft.nl Student: V. Groeneweg Assignment type: Literature Supervisor: Dr. Ir. Y. Pang Report number: 2016.TEL.8072 Specialization: TEL Confidential: NO Creditpoints (EC) 10 Subiect: Improvement for Operational Performance in Baggage Handling Systems regarding Mishandled Baggage Airports are in general struggling to stay profitable while an increasing demand of flights results in the increase in pressure to handle more passengers. The baggage handling of airports can be considered to be one of the limiting factors to increase the capacity and to improve the service. With respect to the operational performance of the baggage handling systems, one key performance indicator is the number of mishandled baggage. The delayed, damaged and even lost baggage have significant impact to the service quality, the customer satisfaction, the compensation costs and the throughput of airports. This literature assignment is to get insight in the causes of mishandled baggage concerning airports, airlines and baggage handlers. The survey will provide the state of the art solutions to improve the operational efficiency by reducing the amount of mishandled baggage in baggage handling processes. The main tasks of this assignment is the following: • to understand the functions of baggage handling systems and the relative equipment » to study the indicators for the operational performance of baggage handling • to explore the factors and the current trends of mishandled baggage • to list the root-causes and to summarize the solutions for mishandled baggage This report should be arranged in such a way that all data is structurally presented in graphs, tables, and lists with belonging descriptions and explanations in text. The report should comply with the guidelines of the section. Details can be found on the website. Dr. Ir. Y. Pang Improvements for Operational Performance in Baggage Handling Systems regarding Mishandled Baggage V. Groeneweg [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Abstract 5 Abstract The process of baggage handling tends to be one of the limiting factors for the extension of airports. Furthermore the need for travelling increases, as well as the world’s population. However the airlines are currently struggling to stay profitable, what results is a focus of airlines to reduce costs. Furthermore the competition increases between the airlines to get the loyalty from the passengers to being able to provide their flight. As a result of this given trend, the airlines and airports focus to improve the throughput of the system, decrease the costs and improve the delivered quality to the customer. One of the important factors in the industry for this is the factor of Mishandled Baggage, because every mishandled bag increases the costs for the airline. This research focuses on methods to improve the operational efficiency of a Baggage Handling System regarding Mishandled Baggage. The whole procedure of baggage handling is defined with the available equipment. The process boundaries are set to be from the moment the passenger is decoupled from the baggage at the check-in desk until the pick up at the reclaim area. To see the operational efficiency of the system in a broader perspective its share in the overall operational performance is determined. It is found that the term operational efficiency is often incorrectly interchanged with productivity and performance. The difference between these terms is defined clearly as performance being the overarching umbrella of all terms, what describes the performance against a benchmark or goal. Below this the profitability defines how well a company operates in the market concerning the input and output price, while productivity only takes into account the amount of output for the amount of used resources. Efficiency and effectiveness are also important terms in these categories. The two terms split the factors for the different categories into two groups. Efficiency concerns about how well the resources are used, while effectiveness is about how a process fulfills the wish of the customer. The different methods of improvement are listed for the different causes what are in short: Human errors Tracing errors Fallen bags Lack of resources A wide variety of improvements is found for the process briefly it concerns: Training and creation of awareness of the check-in agents to prevent the wrong placement of the bags into the system. This should also concern about the mistypes and correct attachment of the tags to the bags. RFID implementation to have better tracking capabilities, what results in less staff members required to scan unreadable tags, while the ability of sorting optimized. The system design has to be such that it prevents bags from falling. Some examples are a cart-based system, reduction of inclinations an declinations to an angle below 18° and by using slowly start and stop system consisting dynamic braking or clutches. Efficient use of resources by implementation of preventive maintenance and adjustment of the flow principle from push to pull. This can be reached by having early arrival of bags in combination with an early baggage storage. Besides this the staff availability can be improved by (semi-)automation of the process and having shorter working days. To finalize the staff can work more efficient by improving communication and coordination. Literature study V. Groeneweg 6 Table of Contents Table of Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................. 5 Table of Contents .................................................................................................................... 6 List of Figures.......................................................................................................................... 8 List of Tables ........................................................................................................................ 10 Glossary ............................................................................................................................... 11 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 Problem description................................................................................................. 12 1.2 Research objective .................................................................................................. 12 1.3 Report outline ......................................................................................................... 13 2. Analysis of the BHS ....................................................................................................... 14 2.1 Traveling facts ......................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Different kinds of Baggage ....................................................................................... 14 2.3 Flow diagram of a BHS ............................................................................................ 15 2.4 Equipment for different BHS functions ....................................................................... 17 2.4.1 In-feed............................................................................................................. 17 2.4.2 Identification ..................................................................................................... 18 2.4.3 Screening ........................................................................................................ 18 2.4.4 Transportation .................................................................................................. 18 2.4.5 Sorting ............................................................................................................ 19 2.4.6 Storage ........................................................................................................... 20 2.4.7 Make-up .......................................................................................................... 20 2.4.8 Outlet .............................................................................................................. 21 2.5 Stakeholders ..........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • \Qjjm .2 O 3J) JUN 0 2 2003 @2003 Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    \Qjjm .2 O 3J) JUN 0 2 2003 @2003 Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Reducing the Air Travel Hassle Factor Through Self-Service Check-in Process Improvements By Jared Keith Miller S.B. Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1998 Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and the Sloan School of Management in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees of Master of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering and Master of Science in Management In Conjunction with the Leaders for Manufacturing Program at the MASSACHUSETTS INSfi iii OF Massachusetts Institute of Technology TECHNOLOGY May 2003 \QjJM .2 o 3J) JUN 0 2 2003 @2003 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. LIBRARIES ... J , ,1 A / /M Signature of Author_ Departmeit of Civil and Environmental Engineering 7 MIT Sloan School of Management May 7, 2003 Certified by_ R. John Hansman, Thesis Advisor Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Certified by_ Thomas Kochan, Thesis Advisor MIT Sloan School of Management Certified by Cynthia Barnliart, Thesis Reader Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Accepted by Margaret Andfews, Executive irector of Master's Program /Sloan School of Management Accepted by Oral Buyukozturk, Chairman Departiental Committee on Graduate Studies Room 14-0551 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 Ph: 617.253.2800 MITLibraries Email: [email protected] Document Services http://Iibraries.mit.eduldocs DISCLAIMER OF QUALITY Due to the condition of the original material, there are unavoidable flaws in this reproduction. We have made every effort possible to provide you with the best copy available. If you are dissatisfied with this product and find it unusable, please contact Document Services as soon as possible. Thank you.
  • Iaps2cern 2017 Geneva Survival Guide Things You Should Know

    Iaps2cern 2017 Geneva Survival Guide Things You Should Know

    iaps2CERN 2017 Geneva survival guide Things you should know: • Book your flights as soon as possible! We suggest that you arrive in Geneva on April 27th between 12:00 and 15:00, or no later than 18:00 if you haven't booked the UN visit. After the visit of the History of Science Museum on April 30th (ending at about 12:00), participants will be welcome to leave. We suggest that you take into account that you might need to go back to the Hostel to collect your luggage (which might take one more hour). The optinal city tour will end at about 4 pm, but you are free to leave at any time. • Make sure that you have a VISA if you need it! Remember that we will be crossing the Swiss-French border at CERN. • The CERN campus offers eduroam access. Things you need to bring: • Passport or ID, and if you need it a visa (for France and Switzerland) • Enough money to buy food and other necessities during your stay. We suggest at least CHF 100 (Switzerland is not famous for its cheap shops). (1CHF is about 0.94 e ) • Rain jacket and/or umbrella • Photo camera Schedule 1 We will be leaving the hotel/ hostel at 7:50 am. Late comers will have to find the way to CERN by themselves according to the description on these pages. So plan your wake-up time accordingly to have a good breakfast which is available from 6:30 am on. A detailed program for April 28th and 29th which are spent at CERN can be seen in an additional file.
  • Elimination Or Reduction of Baggage Recheck for Arriving International Passengers TRB

    Elimination Or Reduction of Baggage Recheck for Arriving International Passengers TRB

    96+ pages; Perfect Bind with SPINE COPY or 65–95 pages; Perfect Bind (NO SPINE COPY) REQUESTED ADDRESS SERVICE Washington, DC 20001 500 Fifth Street, NW BOARD TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH ACRP Report 61 AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH Elimination or Reduction of Baggage Recheck for Arriving International Passengers ACRP PROGRAM REPORT 61 Sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration Elimination or Reduction of Baggage Recheck for Arriving International Passengers Washington, DC Permit No. 8970 ISBN 978-0-309-21395-0 Non-profit Org. U.S. Postage 9 0 0 0 0 PAID TRB 9 780309 213950 ACRP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE* TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2012 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* Abbreviations and acronyms used without definitions in TRB publications: CHAIR OFFICERS AAAE American Association of Airport Executives James Wilding CHAIR: Sandra Rosenbloom, Professor of Planning, University of Arizona, Tucson AASHO American Association of State Highway Officials Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority VICE CHAIR: Deborah H. Butler, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO, Norfolk Southern AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (retired) Corporation, Norfolk, VA ACI–NA Airports Council International–North America EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board ACRP Airport Cooperative Research Program VICE CHAIR ADA Americans with Disabilities Act Jeff Hamiel MEMBERS APTA American Public Transportation Association Minneapolis–St. Paul J. Barry Barker, Executive Director, Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, KY ASCE American Society of Civil Engineers Metropolitan Airports Commission ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers William A.V. Clark, Professor of Geography and Professor of Statistics, Department of Geography, ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials MEMBERS University of California, Los Angeles ATA Air Transport Association James Crites Eugene A.
  • The Opening of Heathrow Terminal 5

    The Opening of Heathrow Terminal 5

    House of Commons Transport Committee The opening of Heathrow Terminal 5 Twelfth Report of Session 2007–08 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 22 October 2008 HC 543 Published on 3 November 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Department for Transport and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman MP (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chairman) Mr David Clelland MP (Labour, Tyne Bridge) Clive Efford MP (Labour, Eltham) Mr Philip Hollobone MP (Conservative, Kettering) Mr John Leech MP (Liberal Democrat, Manchester, Withington) Mr Eric Martlew MP (Labour, Carlisle) Mr Mark Pritchard MP (Conservative, The Wrekin) David Simpson MP (Democratic Unionist, Upper Bann) Mr Graham Stringer MP (Labour, Manchester Blackley) Mr David Wilshire MP (Conservative, Spelthorne) The following were also members of the Committee during the period covered by this report: Mrs Gwyneth Dunwoody MP (Labour, Crewe and Nantwich) Mr Lee Scott (Conservative, Ilford North) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/transcom.
  • 210401-Ground-Vehicle-Operations-Program.Pdf

    210401-Ground-Vehicle-Operations-Program.Pdf

    Table of Contents Topic Page General 3 Definitions 5 Airfield Driver Authorization 9 Rules and Regulations for Movement and Non-movement Drivers 11 Rules and Regulations for Movement Drivers Only 12 Airfield Lighting and Marking and Signage 13 Enforcement / Penalties and Control 16 Airfield Hazards 16 Accidents and Emergencies 17 Security 17 Wildlife Hazard Management Program Security 17 Appendices Phonetic Alphabet 18 Audio Communications 19 Lost Communication Procedures 20 Common Radio Terminology 21 Attachments Section One: General The purpose of this program is to maintain control of all vehicle movement on the airfield. Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 139 requires airports to limit and maintain effective control of ground vehicles operating on movement areas. All vehicles operating on the airfield are required to meet certain liability insurance requirements, register with the airport, and display vehicle identification acceptable to the Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport Authority (CMAA). All personnel having a need to operate on the airfield will be required to undergo training conducted by CMAA before receiving authorization to drive on the airfield, although access may be limited due to security measures. References: Federal Aviation Regulations Part 139 Federal Aviation Advisory Circular 150 Series CMAA Rules and Regulations Federal Aviation Administration Guide “Airport Ground Vehicle Operations” Applicability This plan applies to any and all persons operating motorized ground vehicles on the airfield of the Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport. This plan prohibits the use of bicycles and other vehicle types (golf carts etc.) unless specifically authorized by CMAA. Persons operating vehicles on the airfield are obligated to obey the procedures outlined herein as well as applicable state and local laws.
  • Appendix G Baggage Handling System Study

    Appendix G Baggage Handling System Study

    Appendix G Baggage Handling System Study BAGGAGE HANDLING SYSTEM STUDY G TABLE OF CONTENTS EXHIBITS TABLES G.1 Inventory.................................................................................... 1 Exhibit G.1-1 | Baggage Screening Process ............................................. 2 Table G.1-1 | Overview of Terminals and Boarding Areas ..................... 2 Exhibit G.1-2 | CTX Explosives Detection System ................................... 3 Table G.1-2 | Terminal 1 Baggage Handling Systems Inventory .......... 5 G.2 Facility Requirements and Design Basis ............................. 14 Exhibit G.1-3 | SFO Overall Existing Baggage Handling System Table G.1-3 | Terminal 2 Baggage Handling Systems Inventory .......... 7 Locations ............................................................................. 4 G.3 Alternative Analysis ............................................................... 27 Table G.1-4 | Terminal 3 Baggage Handling Systems Inventory .......... 9 Exhibit G.1-4 | Terminal 1 Baggage Handling System ........................... 5 G.3.1 Project Drivers .............................................................................. 27 Table G.1-5 | International Terminal Building Boarding Areas Exhibit G.1-5 | Terminal 2 Baggage Handling System ........................... 7 A and G – Existing Baggage Handling System G.3.2 Common Themes Among Alternatives .................................... 30 Operational Capacities ...................................................... 14 Exhibit G.1-6 | Terminal 3 Baggage
  • WASHINGTON AVIATION SUMMARY March 2009 EDITION

    WASHINGTON AVIATION SUMMARY March 2009 EDITION

    WASHINGTON AVIATION SUMMARY March 2009 EDITION CONTENTS I. REGULATORY NEWS................................................................................................ 1 II. AIRPORTS.................................................................................................................. 5 III. SECURITY AND DATA PRIVACY ……………………… ……………………….……...7 IV. E-COMMERCE AND TECHNOLOGY......................................................................... 9 V. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT............................................................................... 10 VI. U.S. CONGRESS...................................................................................................... 13 VII. BILATERAL AND STATE DEPARTMENT NEWS .................................................... 15 VIII. EUROPE/AFRICA..................................................................................................... 16 IX. ASIA/PACIFIC/MIDDLE EAST .................................................................................18 X. AMERICAS ............................................................................................................... 19 For further information, including documents referenced, contact: Joanne W. Young Kirstein & Young PLLC 1750 K Street NW Suite 200 Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 331-3348 Fax: (202) 331-3933 Email: [email protected] http://www.yklaw.com The Kirstein & Young law firm specializes in representing U.S. and foreign airlines, airports, leasing companies, financial institutions and aviation-related
  • IATA Catalog of Standards, Manuals and Guidelines

    IATA Catalog of Standards, Manuals and Guidelines

    Version 2.0 – December 2018 IATA Catalog of Standards, Manuals and Guidelines Cargo, Safety And Operations, Passenger, Finance And Statistics IATA offers the air transport industry a comprehensive suite of products on a multitude of topics. Ranging from regulations and standards to guidance material, these publications are designed to promote safety and optimize efficient operations. IATA Catalog of Standards, Manuals and Guidelines 1 Contents Cargo Passenger Cargo Agency Conference Resolution Manual (CACRM) 2 A4A/IATA Reservations Interline Message Cargo Claims and Loss Prevention Handbook (CCHB) 2 Procedures (AIRIMP) 10 CargoLink 2 Airline Coding Directory (ACD) 10 Cargo Services Conference Resolution Manual (CSCRM) 2 City Code Directory (CCD) 10 Cargo Tariff Coordinating Conferences Mileage Manual (MPM) 10 Resolutions Manual 2 Multilateral Interline Traffic Agreements (MITA) Cargo-XML Toolkit 2 and Bilateral Interline E-Ticketing Agreements (BIETA) 10 Dangerous Goods Regulations (DGR) 3 Passenger Fare Construction Toolkit (PFCT) 10 Infectious Substances Shipping Guidelines (ISSG) 3 Passenger Services Conference Resolutions Manual (PSCRM) 11 IATA Cargo Handling Manual 3 Passenger Tariff Coordinating Lithium Battery Shipping Guidelines (LBSG) 3 Conference Composite and Worldwide Live Animals Regulations (LAR) 4 Resolution Manual - The Composite Manual 11 Perishable Cargo Regulations (PCR) 4 Reservations Handbook (RHB) 11 Temperature Control Regulations (TCR) 4 Standard Schedules Information Manual (SSIM) 11 The Air Cargo Tariff and Rules
  • Airport Service Quality Benchmarking the Global Airport Industry

    Airport Service Quality Benchmarking the Global Airport Industry

    Best Practice Report Baggage Carts Conference Program AIRPORT SERVICE QUALITY BENCHMARKING THE GLOBAL AIRPORT INDUSTRY Best Practice Report Baggage Carts AIRPORTS COUNCIL INTERNATIONAL Introduction Airport Service Quality (ASQ) is a comprehensive ACI Contents initiative to help airports in their continuing efforts to improve the quality of service experienced by Landside baggage carts 2 passengers. Pricing 3 The Best Practice Report is a new service offered by the ASQ Survey and is part of the programme’s commitment Baggage cart features 4 to identifying and disseminating best practices from top- performing airports around the world. Baggage cart management 5 The report focuses on a specific topic, aiming to provide Airside baggage carts 6 a comprehensive picture of practices at participating airports as well as to serve as the basis for further discussions between ASQ participants. The report is based on information collected from Survey Participants airports participating in the ASQ Survey using an on- line questionnaire. The present document is a short Africa / Middle East - Asia presentation of the main results of the research and has Bangkok, Christchurch, Doha, Hong Kong, Kuala Lumpur, been rendered anonymous. ASQ participants received the Muscat, Nagoya, Nairobi, New Delhi, Seoul ICN, Sydney, full report along with individual profiles for all airports Tel Aviv which participated in the online survey. Americas The topic of the first Best Practice Report is Baggage Atlanta, Austin, Calgary, Cancun, Cleveland, Detroit, Carts. The following
  • Emirates Azerbaijan Oberoi Group

    Emirates Azerbaijan Oberoi Group

    LUXURY AND LIFESTYLE TRAVEL MAGAZINE Volume 20 | Issue 04 | May 2020 | ì250 / $8 US A Profiles Media Network Publication www.travelspan.in Emirates sets industry- leading safety standard for customers nes and Airli s face mask Azerbaijan unveils plan to revive tourism Oberoi Group rolls out enhanced health, safety programme across all hotels EXPerieNce THE BEST OF TRAVEL AT YOUR FINGERTIPS SUBSCRIBE TO THE DIGITAL ISSUE Scan this QR code to AVAILABLE ON get the latest issue of TravelSpan Magazine @travelspanindia travelspan1 on your tablet or mobile device! travel span @travelspan1 LUXURY AND LIFESTYLE TRAVEL MAGAZINE A PROFILES MEDIA NETWORK PUBLICATION www.travelspan.in JANUARY 2019 | Rs.250/- SETS NEW CONFERENCE RECORD MUZIRIS PADDLE EXPLORES THE OLDEST SPICE ROUTE OF THE PERFECT WARM WINTER KERALA HOLIDAY DESTINATION Top reasons travelers The can't keep away from BEST THINGS 20 TO DO IN 18TH YEAR OF PUBLICATION January February March April LUXURY AND LIFESTYLE TRAVEL MAGAZINE LUXURY AND LIFESTYLE TRAVEL MAGAZINE Volume 19 | Issue 04 | May 2019 | ì250 / $8 US Volume 19 | Issue 05 | June 2019 | ì250 / $8 US A Profiles Media Network Publication A Profiles Media Network Publication www.travelspan.in www.travelspan.in The Hot List 2019 Your guide to the rise of best resort wear The World’s SUNDRESS Best Hotels 2019 Collection Places To Stay Designer Resort Wear May Traveling June LUXURY AND LIFESTYLE TRAVEL MAGAZINE Through LUXURY AND LIFESTYLE TRAVEL MAGAZINE Volume 19 | Issue 06 | July 2019 | ì250 / $8 US Volume 19 | Issue 07 | August
  • Airport Landside Sustainable Capacity and Level of Service of Terminal Functional Subsystems

    Airport Landside Sustainable Capacity and Level of Service of Terminal Functional Subsystems

    sustainability Article Airport Landside Sustainable Capacity and Level of Service of Terminal Functional Subsystems Paola Di Mascio * , Laura Moretti and Massimiliano Piacitelli Department of Civil, Building and Environmental Engineering, Sapienza-University of Rome, Via Eudossiana 18, 00186 Rome, Italy; [email protected] (L.M.); [email protected] (M.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 3 September 2020; Accepted: 19 October 2020; Published: 22 October 2020 Abstract: The airport terminal is a complex building composed of many functional subsystems dimensioned to host passenger traffic, considering an appropriate level of service (LoS). The most widely known method to assess the LoS and design the terminal areas is the Airport Development Reference Manual by the International Air Transport Association (IATA). Based on this, a calculation tool in Microsoft Excel® was implemented to assess the capacity and dimension of the facilities for each functional subsystem of the terminal. The tool, composed of nine correlated spreadsheets, is a useful model to design new structures, evaluate the LoS currently offered, plan interventions, and face the new rules of passenger distancing due to the COVID-19 emergency. An international airport terminal with 20 million/year including Schengen and extra-Schengen passengers was studied. The LoS of the terminal subsystems was assessed and the areas needed for each subsystem were calculated. In the analyzed case study, most subsystems (departure hall, check-in, boarding gates, baggage claim, and arrival halls) were over-designed, according to the definition of the IATA LoS. This means that available spaces for queues and holding are sufficiently large to easily face the new rules of social distancing for passengers due to the recent COVID-19 emergency.
  • Vanquishing the V/PD: Quarterly Publication from the Safety Section

    Vanquishing the V/PD: Quarterly Publication from the Safety Section

    Vanquishing the V/PD 1st Quarter 2015 A quarterly publication from the Safety Section Federal Aviation Administration Airports Division Western-Pacific Region This publication is directed primarily towards airport management to be disseminated to all levels of personnel working at your airfield. Vanquishing the V/PD can be accomplished through a solid partnership between the FAA and airport management. The responsibility of making sure that the proper safeguards are in place; however, lies squarely on the shoulders of airport management. Please use this information and all that follows as a guide by which to provide a safer environment at your airfield. 2014 is now in the history books. Western-Pacific Certification Safety Inspectors investigate all the vehicle/pedestrian deviations (V/PDs) that occur in our region. The investigation information is recorded and sorted into statistical data. The statistical data is used to identify V/PD trends developing in our region. What kind of V/PD statistical data and trends did we see in the Western-Pacific Region in CY 2014? In calendar year 2014 the Western Pacific Region experienced 101 V/PDs. 51 V/PDs were experienced at general aviation airports and 50 at certificated airports. 50 of the V/PDs resulted in runway incursions and 51 resulted in surface incidents. The CY 2014 total V/PD count was higher than in years past. Factors contributing to this year’s higher V/PD count were: • An increased trend in self reporting by sponsors • Unannounced operations in the non-movement sections of runway safety areas now counted as V/PD runway incursions • No tolerance V/PD reporting policy by the air traffic control towers • Baggage cart break-aways, displaced baggage containers and other equipment malfunctions now counted as V/PDs • Air traffic control towers are focusing attention on reporting specific operations • Aircraft cut-offs by vehicles on service roads are initially recorded as V/PDs The biggest trend we have noticed in CY 2014 is that guests and visitors at GA airports are not being escorted properly.