DOCSLIB.ORG

Restoring Riparian and Wetland Habitat in the Colorado River Delta

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A DELTA ONCE MORE: RESTORING RIPARIAN AND WETLAND HABITAT IN THE COLORADO RIVER DELTA Daniel F. Luecke Jennifer Pitt ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND Boulder, Colorado Chelsea Congdon Boulder, Colorado Edward Glenn, Ph.D. Environmental Research Laboratory, University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona Carlos Valdés-Casillas, Ph.D. Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey Guaymas, Mexico Mark Briggs Sonoran Institute Tucson, Arizona June 1999 ISBN 1-58144-356-0 © 1999 Environmental Defense Fund The Environmental Defense Fund is a leading, national, New York-based, private, non-profit, research and advocacy organization with more than 300,000 members nationwide. EDF’s staff includes scientists, economists, engineers, and attorneys who seek practical solutions to a broad range of environmental and human health problems. Copies of this report may be obtained from: EDF Publications 1875 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20009 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS EDF gratefully acknowledges the contributors who have generously supported its work in the Colorado River Delta region, including the Compton Foundation, the General Service Foundation, the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, the Catto Foundation, and the Environmental Protection Agency. Thanks to Elena Chavarria for her intelligent translation of the executive summary. In addition, credit is due to Osvel Hinojosa, Yamilett Carrillo, Jaqueline Garcia and Francisco Zamora for their contributions to research in the Colorado River Delta. ABOUT THE AUTHORS: Daniel F. Luecke is an environmental scientist and Edward Glenn is a professor in the Soil, Water, and regional director with the Environmental Defense Environmental Science Department at the University Fund in Boulder, Colorado. Over the past two of Arizona. He has studied the vegetation and water decades he has been involved in a number of river- quality of the delta in collaboration with Mexican ine and aquatic habitat protection projects. scientists over the past decade. Jennifer Pitt is a senior resource analyst with the Carlos Valdés-Casillas is the director of the Center Environmental Defense Fund in Boulder, Colorado. for Conservation of Natural Resources (CECARENA), From 1994 to 1998 she worked on river restoration and head of research of the Instituto Tecnológico y for the National Park Service and American Heritage de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM), Rivers. Campus Guaymas. He has published several reports on assessment and planning of coastal areas in Chelsea Congdon was a senior resource analyst with Mexico, in particular on the Sea of Cortez. the Environmental Defense Fund for 11 years. From 1995 to 1998 she worked in EDFs Rocky Mountain Mark Briggs is the director of research at the Sonoran office, leading the organizations efforts in the Institute, Tucson, Arizona. His area of focus is on Colorado River delta. She continues to work on delta evaluating the health of riparian ecosystems and restoration as a consultant and documentary film developing strategies for improving their overall eco- producer. logic condition. iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Historically, the Colorado River fed one of the deserve greater consideration in the allocation greatest desert estuaries in the world. The of Colorado River resources, the deltas mini- Colorados delta consisted of vast riparian, mum requirements are surprisingly modest. freshwater, brackish, and tidal wetlands that This report outlines the deltas natural and covered 1,930,000 acres (780,000 ha) and cultural history, documents recent scientific supported a legendary richness of plant, bird, findings about the deltas partial recovery, and marine life. Today, conditions are changed. reviews its current political context, and makes Decades of dam construction and water recommendations for securing, assuring, and diversions in the United States and Mexico have managing existing flows to further benefit and reduced the delta to a remnant system of small sustain the deltas remnant wetland ecosystems. wetlands and brackish mudflats. The authors assessed habitat values in the Recently, however, the delta has begun to deltas vegetated riparian areas and wetlands, make a comeback. In the last two decades, and found relatively large areas of dense, floodwater, releases from reservoirs in the woody vegetation capable of supporting signifi- United States, agricultural return flows from cant bird populations. In addition, the authors both countries, and municipal wastewater from measured the quantity and rate of water flows Mexico have proved beneficial. Although flood needed to sustain delta vegetation, and found flows are extremely unreliable and irregular, that annual flows of 32,000 acre-feet (4 x 107 m3), and wastewater is high in salinity and pollut- supplemented by periodic (once every four ants, this water has begun to restore some areas years on average) flood flows of 260,000 of the delta. Current conditions have allowed acre-feet (3.2 x 108 m3), should suffice. Research wetlands to flourish on about 150,000 acres documenting flows needed to support the (60,000 ha). fisheries of the delta and the near-shore marine The authors believe that key areas of the delta environment of the Gulf of California has not might be saved through more efficient use of yet been conducted. water that now flows into the delta. This could Finally, the authors outline recommendations be accomplished without adverse effects on to manage existing flows for the benefit of delta other Colorado basin water users. While ecosystems; change international institutions demand for water by irrigators, cities, and other and agreements to support delta ecosystems; important constituencies makes it unlikely that establish market mechanisms and funding a natural flow regime can be restored to the sources for delta preservation; increase public delta, deliberate management of existing water participation; conduct further research; and resources, such as agricultural drainage, waste- implement site-specific restoration. water, and floodwater, could make a significant difference. Although the deltas ecosystems iv RESUMEN EJECUTIVO Por tiempos inmemorables, el río Colorado mejores consideraciones en la distribución de alimentó uno de los mayores estuarios recursos del Río Colorado, los requerimientos desérticos del mundo. El delta del Colorado mínimos del delta son sorprendentemente consistía en más de 781,060 ha. (1,930,000 acres) modestos. cubiertas por bastos humedales riparios de agua Este reporte describe la historia natural y dulce, agua salobre y de mareas, que sustentaba cultural del delta, documenta los hallazgos una riqueza legendaria de plantas, aves y vida científicos mas recientes referentes a la marina. Hoy las condiciones han cambiado; recuperación parcial del delta, revisa el contexto décadas de construcción de presas y desviación político actual y ofrece recomendaciones para de agua en Estados Unidos y México, han asegurar y orientar el manejo de los flujos reducido el delta a un sistema remanente de existentes hacia el beneficio y sustentabilidad pequeños humedales y lodazales salobres. de los ecosistemas de humedales remanentes Recientemente, sin embargo, el delta ha iniciado del delta. su regreso. En las dos últimas décadas, la Los autores evaluaron los valores del hábitat liberación de flujos de agua de las presas de en la vegetación riparia del delta y encontraron Estados Unidos, las aguas residuales agrícolas áreas relativamente extensas de densa de ambos países y el agua de desecho munici- vegetación de galería y boscosa capaz de pal de México, han probado ser benéficas. A soportar poblaciones significativas de aves. Del pesar de que los flujos de inundación resultan mismo modo, los autores realizaron mediciones ser extremadamente aleatorios e irregulares, y sobre la cantidad y tasa de flujos de agua que las aguas residuales tienen elevada requeridos para soportar la vegetación del delta salinidad y contaminación, esta agua ha y encontraron que flujos anuales de 4 x 107 m3 empezado a restaurar algunas áreas del delta. (32,000 acres-pie), acrecentados por flujos de Las condiciones actuales han permitido el inundación de 3.2 x 108 m3 (260,000 acres-pie) establecimiento de 54,725 ha. (150,000 acres) de cada 4 años en promedio , será suficiente. Aun humedales. no se ha llevado a cabo la investigacion para Los autores confían en que ciertas áreas del delta establecer los flujos necesarios para las podrían ser salvadas mediante un uso mas pesquerias en el delta y en el litoral del Golfo eficiente del agua que fluye ahora a través del de California. él. Esto puede lograrse sin efectos adversos Finalmente, los autores enlistan reco- sobre los otros usos del agua del cauce del mendaciones para el manejo del flujo existente Colorado. Dado que la demanda de agua para para beneficio de los ecosistemas del delta: irrigación, ciudades y otros usuarios de cambiar instituciones y acuerdos inter- importancia, hace remota la posibilidad de que nacionales para apoyar los ecosistemas del un régimen de flujo natural pueda restaurarse delta, establecer mecanismos de mercadotecnia para el delta, el manejo deliberado de los y recaudar recursos para la preservación del recursos hidráulicos, como drenes agrícolas, delta; incrementar la participación pública, aguas residuales y flujos de inundación, avanzar la investigación e implementar podrían lograr una diferencia significativa. A restauración en sitios específicos. pesar de que los ecosistemas del delta merecen v TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Using Observed Residual Error Structure Yields the Best Estimates of Individual Growth Parameters

    Using Observed Residual Error Structure Yields the Best Estimates of Individual Growth Parameters

    fishes Article Using Observed Residual Error Structure Yields the Best Estimates of Individual Growth Parameters Marcelo V. Curiel-Bernal 1,2, E. Alberto Aragón-Noriega 2 , Miguel Á. Cisneros-Mata 1,* , Laura Sánchez-Velasco 3, S. Patricia A. Jiménez-Rosenberg 3 and Alejandro Parés-Sierra 4 1 Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura, Calle 20 No. 605-Sur, Guaymas 85400, Sonora, Mexico; [email protected] 2 Unidad Guaymas del Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S.C. Km 2.35 Camino a El Tular, Estero de Bacochibampo, Guaymas 85454, Sonora, Mexico; [email protected] 3 Instituto Politécnico Nacional-Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional s/n, Playa Palo de Santa Rita, La Paz 23096, Baja California Sur, Mexico; [email protected] (L.S.-V.); [email protected] (S.P.A.J.-R.) 4 Departamento de Oceanografía Física, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Carretera Tijuana-Ensenada 3918, Ensenada 22860, Baja California, Mexico; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +52-622-22-25925 Abstract: Obtaining the best possible estimates of individual growth parameters is essential in studies of physiology, fisheries management, and conservation of natural resources since growth is a key component of population dynamics. In the present work, we use data of an endangered fish species to demonstrate the importance of selecting the right data error structure when fitting growth models in multimodel inference. The totoaba (Totoaba macdonaldi) is a fish species endemic to the Gulf of Citation: Curiel-Bernal, M.V.; California increasingly studied in recent times due to a perceived threat of extinction.
  • 2019 Data Report for Oneida Lake, Livingston County

    2019 Data Report for Oneida Lake, Livingston County

    Michigan Lakes– Ours to Protect 2019 Data Report for Oneida Lake, Livingston County Site ID: 470573 42.4676°N, 83.8488°W The CLMP is brought to you by: 1 About this report: This report is a summary of the data that have been collected through the Cooperative Lakes Monitoring Program. The contents have been customized for your lake. The first page is a summary of the Trophic Status Indicators of your lake (Secchi Disk Transparency, Chlorophyll-a, Spring Total Phosphorus, and Summer Total Phosphorus). Where data are available, they have been summarized for the most recent field season, five years prior to the most recent field season, and since the first year your lake has been enrolled in the program. If you did not take 8 or more Secchi disk measurements or 4 or more chlorophyll measurements, there will not be summary data calculated for these parameters. These numbers of measurements are required to ensure that the results are indicative of overall summer conditions. If you enrolled in Dissolved Oxygen/Temperature, the summary page will have a graph of one of the profiles taken during the late summer (typically August or September). If your lake stratifies, we will use a graph showing the earliest time of stratification, because identifying the timing of this condition and the depth at which it occurs is typically the most important use of dissolved oxygen measurements. The back of the summary page will be an explanation of the Trophic Status Index and where your lake fits on that scale. The rest of the report will be aquatic plant summaries, Score the Shore results, and larger graphs, including all Dissolved Oxygen/Temperature Profiles that you recorded.
  • Endangered Species (Protection, Conser Va Tion and Regulation of Trade)

    Endangered Species (Protection, Conser Va Tion and Regulation of Trade)

    ENDANGERED SPECIES (PROTECTION, CONSER VA TION AND REGULATION OF TRADE) THE ENDANGERED SPECIES (PROTECTION, CONSERVATION AND REGULATION OF TRADE) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Preliminary Short title. Interpretation. Objects of Act. Saving of other laws. Exemptions, etc., relating to trade. Amendment of Schedules. Approved management programmes. Approval of scientific institution. Inter-scientific institution transfer. Breeding in captivity. Artificial propagation. Export of personal or household effects. PART I. Administration Designahem of Mana~mentand establishment of Scientific Authority. Policy directions. Functions of Management Authority. Functions of Scientific Authority. Scientific reports. PART II. Restriction on wade in endangered species 18. Restriction on trade in endangered species. 2 ENDANGERED SPECIES (PROTECTION, CONSERVATION AND REGULA TION OF TRADE) Regulation of trade in species spec fled in the First, Second, Third and Fourth Schedules Application to trade in endangered specimen of species specified in First, Second, Third and Fourth Schedule. Export of specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Importation of specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Re-export of specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Introduction from the sea certificate for specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Export of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Import of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Re-export of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Introduction from the sea of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Export of specimens of species specified in Third Schedule. Import of specimens of species specified in Third Schedule. Re-export of specimens of species specified in Third Schedule. Export of specimens specified in Fourth Schedule. PART 111.
  • Current Insights Into the Effectiveness of Riparian Management, Attainment of Multiple Benefits, and Potential Technical Enhancements

    Current Insights Into the Effectiveness of Riparian Management, Attainment of Multiple Benefits, and Potential Technical Enhancements

    Published March 8, 2019 Journal of Environmental Quality SPECIAL SECTION RIPARIAN BUFFER MANAGEMENT Current Insights into the Effectiveness of Riparian Management, Attainment of Multiple Benefits, and Potential Technical Enhancements Marc Stutter,* Brian Kronvang, Daire Ó hUallacháin, and Joachim Rozemeijer iparian buffers have been one of the most widely Abstract used management options worldwide when dealing Buffer strips between land and waters are widely applied with protection of surface waters from agricultural dif- measures in diffuse pollution management, with desired Rfuse pollution. Appropriately managed riparian areas offer mul- outcomes across other factors. There remains a need for tiple functions related to improving water quality, biodiversity, evidence of pollution mitigation and wider habitat and societal benefits across scales. This paper synthesizes a collection of 16 and climate adaptation. First, riparian areas offer possibilities new primary studies and review papers to provide the latest for protecting watercourses and lakes from inputs of sediments, insights into riparian management. We focus on the following nutrients, pesticides, and other contaminants by intercepting areas: (i) diffuse pollution removal efficiency of conventional surface runoff, tile drainage, and groundwater from adjoining and saturated buffer strips, (ii) enhancing biodiversity of buffers, agricultural fields. Second, riparian areas also offer unique bio- (iii) edge-of-field technologies for improving nutrient retention, and (iv) potential reuse of nutrients and biomass from buffers. diversity (in turn affecting in-field and in-stream biodiversity) Although some topics represent emerging areas, for other including structurally complex layers of vegetation, making well-studied topics (e.g., diffuse pollution), it remains that them attractive to many wildlife species (Naiman et al., 1993).
  • Maritime Swamp Forest (Typic Subtype)

    Maritime Swamp Forest (Typic Subtype)

    MARITIME SWAMP FOREST (TYPIC SUBTYPE) Concept: Maritime Swamp Forests are wetland forests of barrier islands and comparable coastal spits and back-barrier islands, dominated by tall trees of various species. The Typic Subtype includes most examples, which are not dominated by Acer, Nyssa, or Fraxinus, not by Taxodium distichum. Canopy dominants are quite variable among the few examples. Distinguishing Features: Maritime Shrub Swamps are distinguished from other barrier island wetlands by dominance by tree species of (at least potentially) large stature. The Typic Subtype is dominated by combinations of Nyssa, Fraxinus, Liquidambar, Acer, or Quercus nigra, rather than by Taxodium or Salix. Maritime Shrub Swamps are dominated by tall shrubs or small trees, particularly Salix, Persea, or wetland Cornus. Some portions of Maritime Evergreen Forest are marginally wet, but such areas are distinguished by the characteristic canopy dominants of that type, such as Quercus virginiana, Quercus hemisphaerica, or Pinus taeda. The lower strata also are distinctive, with wetland species occurring in Maritime Swamp Forest; however, some species, such as Morella cerifera, may occur in both. Synonyms: Acer rubrum - Nyssa biflora - (Liquidambar styraciflua, Fraxinus sp.) Maritime Swamp Forest (CEGL004082). Ecological Systems: Central Atlantic Coastal Plain Maritime Forest (CES203.261). Sites: Maritime Swamp Forests occur on barrier islands and comparable spits, in well-protected dune swales, edges of dune ridges, and on flats adjacent to freshwater sounds. Soils: Soils are wet sands or mucky sands, most often mapped as Duckston (Typic Psammaquent) or Conaby (Histic Humaquept). Hydrology: Most Maritime Swamp Forests have shallow seasonal standing water and nearly permanently saturated soils. Some may rarely be flooded by salt water during severe storms, but areas that are severely or repeatedly flooded do not recover to swamp forest.
  • PESHTIGO RIVER DELTA Property Owner

    PESHTIGO RIVER DELTA Property Owner

    NORTHEAST - 10 PESHTIGO RIVER DELTA WETLAND TYPES Drew Feldkirchner Floodplain forest, lowland hardwood, swamp, sedge meadow, marsh, shrub carr ECOLOGY & SIGNIFICANCE supports cordgrass, marsh fern, sensitive fern, northern tickseed sunflower, spotted joe-pye weed, orange This Wetland Gem site comprises a very large coastal • jewelweed, turtlehead, marsh cinquefoil, blue skullcap wetland complex along the northwest shore of Green Bay and marsh bellflower. Shrub carr habitat is dominated three miles southeast of the city of Peshtigo. The wetland by slender willow; other shrub species include alder, complex extends upstream along the Peshtigo River for MARINETTE COUNTY red osier dogwood and white meadowsweet. Floodplain two miles from its mouth. This site is significant because forest habitats are dominated by silver maple and green of its size, the diversity of wetland community types ash. Wetlands of the Peshtigo River Delta support several present, and the overall good condition of the vegetation. - rare plant species including few-flowered spikerush, The complexity of the site – including abandoned oxbow variegated horsetail and northern wild raisin. lakes and a series of sloughs and lagoons within the river delta – offers excellent habitat for waterfowl. A number This Wetland Gem provides extensive, diverse and high of rare animals and plants have been documented using quality wetland habitat for many species of waterfowl, these wetlands. The area supports a variety of recreational herons, gulls, terns and shorebirds and is an important uses, such as hunting, fishing, trapping and boating. The staging, nesting and stopover site for many migratory Peshtigo River Delta has been described as the most birds. Rare and interesting bird species documented at diverse and least disturbed wetland complex on the west the site include red-shouldered hawk, black tern, yellow shore of Green Bay.
  • Etched Magazine, January 2015 Issue

    Etched Magazine, January 2015 Issue

    MAGAZINE ([SHULHQFH7KH6RXWKZHVWFRP OUTDOOR Finding Common Ground 2015 PRESERVATION &2//$%25$7,21RECREATION $3.95 U.S. #theevolutionofelan Finding Common Ground PRESERVATION&2//$%25$7,21 RECREATION contents options art lovers a conversation with greg istock 18 creating art, music, and life in abstracts the art of interior design 22 artisans who bring function and style to life the allure of watercolor 26 an historical perspective through the eyes (and brush) of roland lee soul searchers the dark night of the soul 30 a space in time where new life begins let’s try some civility 32 the longing for meaningful (and civil) conversation adventure in wellness 34 a “dream” vacation that truly benefits mind, body, and soul adventure seekers the day we set the colorado river free 41 a grand experiment in ecological restoration boots and burgers 50 a deliciously novel hiking and dining guide concrete to canyons 58 when inner city students step foot into zion desert dwellers building ice age park 62 a prehistoric venture takes shape in urban style story keepers 66 expectations historic structures: in every issue the mouthpiece of history the green that turned golden 70 etched in time 8 the 50th anniversary of leaving their mark 10 dixie red hills golf course #theevolutionofelan 12 experiencethesouthwest.com 13 saving an oasis 74 meditations 14 the collaboration of preservation snapshots 92 and recreation in southern utah culture creators the hills are alive 80 a journey through the years of making music on our cover community arts and Writer, Rowan Jacobsen events information 84 Photography By: Fred Phillips the people, the places, the dates, the vibe...the culture of southern utah leaving their mark FINDING COMMON GROUND EXPERIENCE volume 9 – issue 1 ENJOY THE OUTDOOR ISSUE AWARENESS EDUCATE 2015 PRESERVE Darci Hansen Founder Editor in Chief │ │ Laurie James Design Editor ROWAN JACOBSEN writes about place and how it shapes ecosystems, │ │ cultures, cuisines, and us.
  • A Synthesis of Information I

    A Synthesis of Information I

    Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program * A Synthesis of Information I U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTEXIOR National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Minerals Management Service National Ocean Service Alaska OCS Region Office of Oceanography and Marine Assessment . .:.% y! Ocean Assessments Division ' t. CU ' k Alaska Office OCS Study, MMS 89-0081 . '.'Y. 4 3 --- NOTICES This report has been prepared as part of the U.S. Department bf Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program, and approved for publication. The inter- pretation of data and opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors. Approval does not necessarily signify that the contents reflect the views and policies of the Department of Commerce or those of the Department of the Interior. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) does not approve, recommend, or endorse any proprietary material mentioned in this publication. No reference shall be made to NOAA or to this publication in any advertising or sales promotion which would indicate or imply that NOAA approves, recommends, or endorses any proprietary product or proprietary material mentioned herein, or which has as its purpose or intent to cause directly or indirectly the advertised product to be used or purchased because of this publication. Cover: LandsatTMimage of the Yukon Delta taken on Julg 22, 1975, showing the thamal gradients resulting from Yukon River discharge. In this image land is dqicted in sesof red indicating warmer temperatures versus the dark blues (colder temperatures) of Bering Sea waters. Yukon River water, cooh than the surround- ing land but wanner than marine waters, is represented bg a light aqua blue.
  • Verdura® Native Planting

    Verdura® Native Planting

    Abronia maritime Abronia maritima is a species of sand verbena known by the common name red (Coastal) sand verbena. This is a beach-adapted perennial plant native to the coastlines of southern California, including the Channel Islands, and northern Baja California. Abronia villosa Abronia villosa is a species of sand-verbena known by the common name desert (Inland) sand-verbena. It is native to the deserts of the southwestern United States and northern Mexico and the southern California and Baja coast. Adenostoma Adenostoma fasciculatum (chamise or greasewood) is a flowering plant native to fasciculatum California and northern Baja California. This shrub is one of the most widespread (Coastal/Inland) plants of the chaparral biome. Adenostoma fasciculatum is an evergreen shrub growing to 4m tall, with dry-looking stick-like branches. The leaves are small, 4– 10 mm long and 1mm broad with a pointed apex, and sprout in clusters from the branches. Arctostaphylos Arctostaphylos uva-ursi is a plant species of the genus Arctostaphylos (manzanita). uva-ursi Its common names include kinnikinnick and pinemat manzanita, and it is one of (Coastal/Inland) several related species referred to as bearberry. Arctostaphylos Arctostaphylos edmundsii, with the common name Little Sur manzanita, is a edmundsii species of manzanita. This shrub is endemic to California where it grows on the (Coastal/Inland) coastal bluffs of Monterey County. Arctostaphylos Arctostaphylos hookeri is a species of manzanita known by the common name hookeri Hooker's manzanita. Arctostaphylos hookeri is a low shrub which is variable in (Coastal/Inland) appearance and has several subspecies. The Arctostaphylos hookeri shrub is endemic to California where its native range extends from the coastal San Francisco Bay Area to the Central Coast.
  • Imperial Irrigation District Final EIS/EIR

    Imperial Irrigation District Final EIS/EIR

    Contents Contents Section Page Preface/Abstract.................................................................................................................................iii List of Tables .....................................................................................................................................xv List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. xxi Acronyms.......................................................................................................................................xxvii Glossary ..........................................................................................................................................xxxv Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................ES-1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................ES-1 Project Background and History...................................................................................ES-2 Project Overview .............................................................................................................ES-3 Project Purpose, Need, and Objectives ........................................................................ES-6 Other Proposed Agreements, Plans, and Projects Related to Resources Affected by the Proposed Project..........................................................................ES-9
  • Pdf Clickbook Booklet

    Pdf Clickbook Booklet

    97 Rosac Adenostoma sparsifolium red shanks X 98 Rosac Prunus fasciculata var. fasciculata desert almond X Checklist of the Vascular Flora of the White Wash Area 99 Rosac Prunus fremontii desert apricot X 99 #Plants 100 Rosac Prunus ilicifolia ssp. ilicifolia hollyleaf cherry X # Family Scientific Name (*) Common Name CR HC WW Galium angustifolium ssp. 101 Rubia narrowleaf bedstraw 3 Ferns angustifolium 1 Pteri Cheilanthes covillei beady lipfern 30 102 Rutac Thamnosma montana turpentine broom X 25 2 Pteri Pellaea mucronata var. mucronata bird's-foot fern 1 103 Salic Populus fremontii ssp. fremontii Fremont cottonwood X 20 Gymnosperms 104 Salic Salix exigua narrowleaf willow X 3 Cupre Juniperus californica California juniper X 99 105 Salic Salix exigua var. exigua narrowleaf willow 10 4 Ephed Ephedra californica desert tea X 99 106 Salic Salix laevigata red willow X 5 5 Pinac Pinus monophylla pinyon pine X 107 Salic Salix lasiolepis arroyo willow X Eudicots 108 Simmo Simmondsia chinensis jojoba X 20 6 Adoxa Sambucus nigra ssp. caerulea blue elderberry X 109 Solan Datura wrightii sacred datura X 7 Anaca Rhus ovata sugar bush X 5 110 Solan Lycium andersonii Anderson's desert-thorn 1 8 Aster Adenophyllum porophylloides San Felipe dogweed X 5 111 Tamar Tamarix ramosissima *saltcedar X 1 9 Aster Ambrosia acanthicarpa bur-ragweed X 20 112 Visca Phoradendron bolleanum dense mistletoe 99 10 Aster Ambrosia salsola var. salsola cheesebush X 50 113 Visca Phoradendron californicum desert mistletoe X 15 11 Aster Artemisia dracunculus wild tarragon X 114 Zygop Larrea tridentata creosote bush X 99 12 Aster Artemisia tridentata big sagebrush X Monocots 13 Aster Baccharis salicifolia ssp.
  • Colorado River Slideshow Title TK

    Colorado River Slideshow Title TK

    The Colorado River: Lifeline of the Southwest { The Headwaters The Colorado River begins in the Rocky Mountains at elevation 10,000 feet, about 60 miles northwest of Denver in Colorado. The Path Snow melts into water, flows into the river and moves downstream. In Utah, the river meets primary tributaries, the Green River and the San Juan River, before flowing into Lake Powell and beyond. Source: Bureau of Reclamation The Path In total, the Colorado River cuts through 1,450 miles of mountains, plains and deserts to Mexico and the Gulf of California. Source: George Eastman House It was almost 1,500 years ago when humans first tapped the river. Since then, the water has been claimed, reclaimed, divided and subdivided many times. The river is the life source for seven states – Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming – as well as the Republic of Mexico. River Water Uses There are many demands for Colorado River water: • Agriculture and Livestock • Municipal and Industrial • Recreation • Fish/Wildlife and Habitat • Hydroelectricity • Tribes • Mexico Source: USGS Agriculture The Colorado River provides irrigation water to about 3.5 million acres of farmland – about 80 percent of its flows. Municipal Phoenix Denver About 15 percent of Colorado River flows provide drinking and household water to more than 30 million people. These cities include: Las Vegas and Phoenix, and cities outside the Basin – Denver, Albuquerque, Salt Lake City, Los Angeles, San Diego and Tijuana, Mexico. Recreation Source: Utah Office of Tourism Source: Emma Williams Recreation includes fishing, boating, waterskiing, camping and whitewater rafting in 22 National Wildlife Refuges, National Parks and National Recreation Areas along river.