DOCSLIB.ORG

Intercity East Coast Franchise

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Intercity East Coast Franchise House of Commons Transport Committee Intercity East Coast Franchise Fifth Report of Session 2017–19 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 5 September 2018 HC 891 Published on 12 September 2018 by authority of the House of Commons Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Transport and its associated public bodies. Current membership Lilian Greenwood MP (Labour, Nottingham South) (Chair) Jack Brereton MP (Conservative, Stoke-on-Trent South) Ronnie Cowan MP (SNP, Inverclyde) Steve Double MP (Conservatives, St Austell and Newquay) Paul Girvan MP (DUP, South Antrim) Huw Merriman MP (Conservatives, Bexhill and Battle) Grahame Morris MP (Labour, Easington) Luke Pollard MP (Labour, Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport) Iain Stewart MP (Conservatives, Milton Keynes South) Graham Stringer MP (Labour, Blackley and Broughton) Daniel Zeichner MP (Labour, Cambridge) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/transcom and in print by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the inquiry publications page of the Committee’s website. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Gordon Clarke (Committee Clerk), Ed Faulkner (Second Clerk), James Clarke (Committee Specialist), Nerys Davies (Committee Specialist), Andrew Haylen (Committee Specialist), Deborah Courtney (Senior Committee Assistant), Michelle Owens, (Committee Assistant), Estelle Currie (Senior Media Officer) and Simon Horswell (Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Transport Committee, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 3266; the Committee’s email address is [email protected]. Intercity East Coast Franchise 1 Contents Executive Summary 3 1 Introduction 6 Virgin Trains East Coast franchise 6 2 What went wrong with the franchise? 8 VTEC’s management of the franchise 8 The bid process and contractual arrangements 8 Revenue projections led to default 8 The DfT encouraged overbidding 14 Stress-testing of bids by the DfT was insufficient 15 There need to be more appropriate risk sharing mechanisms 16 The Department had no other option than to let the franchise default 17 The taxpayer has not bailed out Stagecoach and Virgin 18 Network Rail’s role 18 Delayed infrastructure works on the East Coast Mainline not to blame for default 18 Network Rail performance poor but not significantly contributable to default 21 3 Interim operating arrangements 23 4 The East Coast Partnership 26 5 Wider franchising issues 30 Conclusions and recommendations 33 Formal minutes 37 Witnesses 38 Published written evidence 39 List of Reports from the Committee during the current Parliament 40 Intercity East Coast Franchise 3 Executive Summary The Intercity East Coast (ICEC) franchise has a troubled history. The joint-venture between Stagecoach and Virgin, operated as Virgin Trains East Coast (VTEC), is the third time in just over a decade that this franchise has failed. The actual day-to-day operations of the franchise were managed successfully by VTEC. Based on passenger satisfaction, it was amongst the highest performing long-distance franchises on the network. In terms of VTEC’s operational finances, the franchise was performing well and VTEC made an operational profit of around £260 million in the financial year prior to its termination. Despite this, the operating surplus generated did not fully cover the premium obligations it had with the Department for Transport (DfT) as part of its franchise contract. To cover the revenue shortfalls, VTEC had to forego the £165 million parent company guarantee it committed to the DfT when the franchise was let. By the end of January 2018, the last parent company support was drawn down and the franchise went into technical default. The latest ICEC franchise therefore failed because the revenue projections underpinning the VTEC bid were over-optimistic and it simply ran out of money. Revenue fell short of expectations from day one and passenger growth that was anticipated never materialised; the franchise eventually failed after just three years of operation. Franchises should be able to withstand normal fluctuations in the economic cycle. The fact that this franchise did not suggests that Stagecoach and Virgin built very little resilience into their bid. Their assessment of the financial risk associated with their bid was wholly inadequate and VTEC’s bid for the franchise was over-optimistic. This was naïve, and it should have been more aware of the financial risks involved, particularly given the history of this franchise and Stagecoach and Virgin’s long history of bidding for and running franchises in this country. We conclude that Stagecoach and Virgin bear prime responsibility for the failure of this franchise. The DfT must also take responsibility for not managing the bid process effectively enough. The DfT encouraged overbidding by setting unrealistic benchmarks in the Invitation to Tender, and the bid process lacked the necessary boundaries to temper over-optimistic bidding. Specifically, the DfT’s financial stress-testing of the bids was not robust enough. If the DfT had conducted appropriate due diligence and identified weaknesses in the assumptions underpinning the bid, it may not have been in this position today. Network Rail do not bear any responsibility for the early termination of this franchise. To date, Network Rail have provided all the infrastructure upgrades that it had formally committed to when this franchise was let. A series of other upgrades were assumed to occur by the DfT and VTEC to deliver an enhanced timetable from 2019 onward; though there was no formal funding commitment to these upgrades when the franchise was let. The delivery of these enhancements will now occur but later than was initially anticipated by the DfT and VTEC. This delay would have undermined assumed revenue growth from 2019 onward but did not directly contribute to the early termination of this franchise. While Network Rail’s performance in managing the ECML had not been up to standard, and this clearly undermined franchise performance, it was not on a scale that led to VTEC defaulting on their contract. Further, compensation for revenue losses are dealt with through normal industry mechanisms. 4 Intercity East Coast Franchise Knowing that the financial picture was bleak from day one of this franchise, it might have been a simpler for the DfT to find an early contractual solution to this problem. One option might have been to rebase the revenue forecasts at the beginning of the franchise. At the time the franchise was let, the DfT had a policy of not renegotiating franchises once they had been let. This was to preserve the financial interests of the taxpayer and to preserve the integrity of the franchising market. Given this policy and the fact that there were no material changes in the wider economic environment (e.g. a recession), renegotiation of the contract with VTEC may have set a precedent for other operators in similar financial positions. The DfT therefore had no alternative but to let the contract run its course to default. Various reports of a bail-out emerged after it appeared, and was then confirmed, that the VTEC contract would be terminated prematurely. The franchise has not delivered the premiums to the taxpayer that were originally envisaged when the franchise was let. Because of the contract termination, the tax-payer will no longer receive the entirety of the £2 billion that had been expected over the remainder of the franchise. It is important to note, however, that based on the contract that was originally agreed with the Government, the taxpayer has not bailed out Stagecoach and Virgin. This is because Stagecoach and Virgin had their liability capped at £165 million, which was the amount of their parent company guarantee. The Secretary of State terminated VTEC’s contract on 24 June 2018 and transferred operations to the operator of last resort, under the brand ‘London North Eastern Railway’. While it is too early to know whether the decision to transfer control to the operator of last resort was the right one, we are critical of the Secretary of State for a lack of a clear plan and timescales upon which the interim operator will run the franchise. We recommend that the Secretary of State set out how long he expects the operator of last resort to run the franchise and clarify exactly how the DfT will manage any operational and investment risks until the longer-term arrangements are in place. We are not aware of the existence of formal obligations and targets for the operator of last resort for the Intercity East Coast franchise. We recommend that whenever the operator of last resort arrangement is invoked, the DfT should revise and publish obligations and targets for the operation of the failed franchise by the operator of last resort, in order to provide passengers, taxpayers, Parliament and industry certainty of its business plan, strategy and development plans. This should be done within six months of assuming responsibility for a franchise. The DfT are developing plans to launch the ‘East Coast Partnership’ in 2020, though the exact date remains uncertain. This new operating model, where both track and train operators will be managed ‘under one roof’, is designed to encourage a more integrated and joined up approach to running this franchise. We conclude that greater joint-working and clear lines of accountability through a single person responsible for track and trains offers potential for significant improvement in services.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cytundeb Diffiniadau
    TO BE EXECUTED AS A DEED DEFINITIONS AGREEMENT SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT (1) and WELSH MINISTERS (2) 1 45763.11 THIS DEFINITIONS AGREEMENT is dated 2018 BETWEEN (1) THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT whose principal address is Great Minster House, 33 Horseferry Road, London SW1P 4DR (the “Secretary of State”); and (2) WELSH MINISTERS whose principal place of business is Crown Building, Cathays Park, Cardiff CF10 3NQ ("Welsh Ministers)" (including, as appropriate, Affiliates or subsidiaries of Welsh Ministers acting on its behalf), each a “Party” and together the “Parties”. WHEREAS: (A) The Secretary of State and Welsh Ministers propose to enter into a number of agreements (the “Wales & Borders Agreements”) in connection with Welsh Ministers acting as agent for the Secretary of State in respect of certain English services which are specified in a Welsh franchise agreement. (B) The Secretary of State and Welsh Ministers wish to set out in this Agreement, definitions of the terms used in the Wales & Borders Agreements. NOW IT IS AGREED as follows: 1. CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATION In the Wales & Borders Agreements, except to the extent the context otherwise requires: (a) words and expressions defined in the Railways Act have the same meanings when used therein provided that, except to the extent expressly stated, “railway” shall not have the wider meaning attributed to it by Section 81(2) of the Act; (b) words and expressions defined in the Interpretation Act 1978 have the same meanings when used in the Wales & Borders Agreements;
    [Show full text]
  • Railfuture Response to Consultations on the Proposed East Coast Main Line Timetable May 2022
    RAILFUTURE RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS ON THE PROPOSED EAST COAST MAIN LINE TIMETABLE MAY 2022 From: Railfuture Passenger Group & Branches: East Anglia, East Midlands, Lincolnshire, London & South East, North East, North West, Yorkshire & Scotland Submitted to: CrossCountry, Great Northern/Thameslink, LNER, Northern, TransPennine Express Copied to: East Midlands Railway, First East Coast Trains, Grand Central, Hull Trains, Network Rail & ScotRail Index Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary....................................................................................................................................... 2 Strategic Interventions .................................................................................................................................. 3 LNER ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 Responses to LNER Questionnaire ............................................................................................ 6 TransPennine Express .................................................................................................................................. 9 CrossCountry ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Lincs 67
    Has Grantham event delivered a rail asset? The visit of record breaking steam locomotive, A4 pacific Mallard, to Grantham at the RailRail LincsLincs beginning of September, has been hailed an outstanding success by the organisers. Number 67 = October 2013 = ISSN 1350-0031 LINCOLNSHIRE With major sponsorship from Lincolnshire County Council, South Kesteven District Lincolnshire & South Humberside Branch of the Council and Carillion Rail; good weather and free admission, the event gave Grantham Railway Development Society N e w s l e t t e r high profile media interest, attracting in excess of 15,000 visitors (some five times the original estimate). Branch has a busy weekend at One noticeable achievement has been the reconstruction of a siding resulting in the clearing of an ‘eyesore’ piece of land at Grantham station, which forms a gateway to the Grantham Rail Show town. The success of the weekend has encouraged the idea for a similar heritage event Thank you to everyone who helped us The weekend was also a very in the future. over the Grantham Rail Show weekend. successful fund raising event which has However, when the piece of land was cleared and the Up side siding reinstated, it This year, the Rail Show was held in left our stock of donated items very became apparent that Grantham had, possibly, unintentionally received a valuable association with the Mallard Festival of depleted. If you have any unwanted items commercial railway asset. Here is a siding connected to the national rail network with Speed event at Grantham station, with a that we could sell at future events, we easy road level access only yards from main roads, forming the ideal location for a small free vintage bus service linking the two would like to hear from you.
    [Show full text]
  • 31645 Highspeed Rail Bill.Indd
    31645 HighSpeed Rail Bill Modified—26 July 2013 4:45 AM Public Bill Committee HIGH SPEED RAIL (preparation) BILL WRITTEN EVIDENCE PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDON – THE STATIONERY OFFICE LIMITED PBC (Bill 010) 2013 - 2014 31645 HighSpeed Rail Bill Modified—26 July 2013 4:45 AM © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2013 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] Distributed by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online The Houses of Parliament Shop www.tsoshop.co.uk 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square London SW1A 2JX Mail, Telephone, Fax & E-mail Telephone orders: 020 7219 3890 TSO General enquiries: 020 7219 3890 PO Box 29, Norwich NR3 1GN Fax orders: 020 7219 3866 Telephone orders/General enquiries: 0870 600 5522 Email: shopwparliament.uk Order through the Parliamentary Hotline Lo-call 0845 7 023474 Internet: Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 http://www.shop.parliament.uk E-mail: customer.serviceswtso.co.uk Textphone: 0870 240 3701 TSOwBlackwell and other Accredited Agents 31645 31645 HighSpeed Rail Bill Modified—26 July 2013 4:45 AM High Speed Rail (Preparation) Bill: Written evidence 3 Contents Camden London Borough Council (HSR 01) Dr Paul Hoad (HSR 02) Dr Chris Eaglen LLB (HSR 03) Andrew Bodman (HSR 04) Wendover HS2 action group (WHS2) (HSR 05) HS2 Action Alliance (HSR 06) Greengauge
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Issues Update
    Briefing Paper to the Energy and Infrastructure Overview and Scrutiny Commission 4th March 2014 Rail Issues Update Briefing Paper of the City Regeneration and Policy Manager 1. Purpose of the Briefing Note This report is an interim position statement on rail issues following the rail themed meeting of this commission with rail industry representatives in June 2013. Rail industry representatives have been invited to attend this commission to answer questions and give further updates. 2. Rail Issues for Consideration 2.1. Electrification 2.1.1. First Hull Trains (FHT) have submitted a proposal to the Government in which they would raise the funding to deliver electrification of the route between the East Coast Main Line (North of Doncaster) through to Hull via Selby. This could potentially bring electrification forward to 2016/17 (The Government currently does not plan to electrify this section until some unspecified time after 2019). FHT‟s proposal appears to depend on the Government releasing the funding to „buy-back‟ the completed electric infrastructure. Exactly how much (and when) the Government agree to pay is critical to FHT‟s fund raising and to any request for public funding support. FHT have requested a grant from the LEP (Local Growth fund) and a loan (Public Works Loan Board) from the LEP / Council towards the total scheme cost which is believed to be around £94m 2.1.2. The Council, business leaders and MP‟s have been lobbying ministers for early scheme funding and they have agreed to meet a delegation from the City and the East Riding on the 25th February (verbal update to be given).
    [Show full text]
  • United States GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS Monthly Catalog ISSUED by the Superintendent of Documents
    United States GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS Monthly Catalog ISSUED BY THE Superintendent of Documents no . 608 SEPTEMBER I 945 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 194$ FOR SALE BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS, U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 25, D. C., PRICE 20 CENTS PER COPY SUBSCRIPTION PRICE $2.25 PER YEAR FOREIGN SUBSCRIPTION $2.85 PER YEAR Contents Page Abbreviations, Explanation_________ iv Alphabetical List of Government Authors________________________ v General Information_______________ 927 Notes of General Interest__________ 930 New Classification Numbers, etc____ 931 Congressional Set_________________ 932 Monthly Catalog__________________ 933 m Abbreviations Amendment, amendments_____ amdt., amdts. Paragraph, paragraphs---------------- par., pars. Appendix---------------------------------------------- app. Part, parts------------------------------------- pt., pts. Article, articles________________________ art. Plate, plates____________________________ pi. Chapter, chapters_____________________ chap. Portrait, portraits_____________________ por. Congress-------------------------------------------- Cong. Quarto___________________________________40 Department__________________________Dept. Report_________________________________ rp. Document_____________________________ doc. Saint----------------------------------------------------- st. Facsimile, facsimiles_______________ facsim. Section, sections_______________________ sec. Folio____________________________________fo Senate, Senate bill______________________
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Routes and Ticket Acceptance During Disruption on Virgin Trains West Coast See Map Page 2
    Alternative routes and ticket acceptance during disruption on Virgin Trains West Coast see map page 2 Virgin route Alternative route Operator Euston - West Midlands Marylebone - West Midlands Chiltern Railways Paddington - Reading / Oxford First Great Western Reading / Oxford - West Midlands CrossCountry Euston - North Wales Birmingham / Crewe / Wrexham - Holyhead Arriva Trains Wales Euston - Manchester St Pancras - Sheffield East Midlands Trains Sheffield - Manchester TransPennine Express / Northern King’s Cross - Leeds - Manchester Virgin Trains East Coast / TransPennine Express / Northern Euston - Liverpool Birmingham - Liverpool London Northwestern Chester - Liverpool Merseyrail Euston - Preston and Scotland King’s Cross - Newcastle / Scotland Virgin Trains East Coast West Midlands - York - Scotland CrossCountry Birmingham - Preston and Scotland West Midlands - York - Scotland CrossCountry Virgin WC alternative routes 6 29/11/17 www.projectmapping.co.uk Dyce Kingussie Spean Aberdeen Glenfinnan Bridge Mallaig Blair Atholl Fort Stonehaven William Rannoch Montrose Pitlochry Arbroath Tyndrum Oban Dalmally Alternative Crianlarichroutes and ticket acceptancePerth Dundee Gleneagles Cupar Dunblane during disruptionArrochar & Tarbet on Virgin Trains West Coast Stirling Dunfermline Kirkcaldy Larbert Alloa Inverkeithing Garelochhead Falkirk Balloch Grahamston EDINBURGH Helensburgh Upper Polmont Waverley Milngavie North Berwick Helensburgh Central Lenzie Falkirk Bathgate Dunbar High Dumbarton Central Maryhill Haymarket Westerton Springburn Cumbernauld
    [Show full text]
  • Midnight Train to Georgemas Report Final 08-12-2017
    Midnight Train to Georgemas 08/12/2017 Reference number 105983 MIDNIGHT TRAIN TO GEORGEMAS MIDNIGHT TRAIN TO GEORGEMAS MIDNIGHT TRAIN TO GEORGEMAS IDENTIFICATION TABLE Client/Project owner HITRANS Project Midnight Train to Georgemas Study Midnight Train to Georgemas Type of document Report Date 08/12/2017 File name Midnight Train to Georgemas Report v5 Reference number 105983 Number of pages 57 APPROVAL Version Name Position Date Modifications Claire Mackay Principal Author 03/07/2017 James Consultant Jackson David Project 1 Connolly, Checked Director 24/07/2017 by Alan Director Beswick Approved David Project 24/07/2017 by Connolly Director James Principal Author 21/11/2017 Jackson Consultant Alan Modifications Director Beswick to service Checked 2 21/11/2017 costs and by Project David demand Director Connolly forecasts Approved David Project 21/11/2017 by Connolly Director James Principal Author 08/12/2017 Jackson Consultant Alan Director Beswick Checked Final client 3 08/12/2017 by Project comments David Director Connolly Approved David Project 08/12/2017 by Connolly Director TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 6 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 6 2.1 EXISTING COACH AND RAIL SERVICES 6 2.2 CALEDONIAN SLEEPER 7 2.3 CAR -BASED TRAVEL TO /FROM THE CAITHNESS /O RKNEY AREA 8 2.4 EXISTING FERRY SERVICES AND POTENTIAL CHANGES TO THESE 9 2.5 AIR SERVICES TO ORKNEY AND WICK 10 2.6 MOBILE PHONE -BASED ESTIMATES OF CURRENT TRAVEL PATTERNS 11 3. STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION 14 4. PROBLEMS/ISSUES 14 4.2 CONSTRAINTS 16 4.3 RISKS : 16 5. OPPORTUNITIES 17 6. SLEEPER OPERATIONS 19 6.1 INTRODUCTION 19 6.2 SERVICE DESCRIPTION & ROUTING OPTIONS 19 6.3 MIXED TRAIN OPERATION 22 6.4 TRACTION & ROLLING STOCK OPTIONS 25 6.5 TIMETABLE PLANNING 32 7.
    [Show full text]
  • SEA CONTAINERS LTD. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    QuickLinks −− Click here to rapidly navigate through this document UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10−K (Mark One) Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 or Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from to to Commission File Number 1−7560 SEA CONTAINERS LTD. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) BERMUDA 98−0038412 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 41 CEDAR AVENUE, P.O. BOX HM 1179 HAMILTON HM EX, BERMUDA (Address of principal executive offices) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (441) 295−2244 SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: Name of each exchange Title of each class on which registered 1 9 /2% Senior Notes Due 2003 New York Stock Exchange 1 10 /2% Senior Notes Due 2003 New York Stock Exchange 3 10 /4% Senior Notes Due 2006 New York Stock Exchange 7 7 /8% Senior Notes Due 2008 New York Stock Exchange 1 12 /2% Senior Subordinated Debentures Due 2004, Series A and B New York Stock Exchange Class A and Class B Common Shares, $0.01 par value each New York Stock Exchange Pacific Exchange Preferred Share Purchase Rights New York Stock Exchange Pacific Exchange SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: None. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plan for Passenger Information During Disruption (PIDD)
    SERVICE DELIVERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Local Plan for Passenger Information During Disruption (PIDD) Document Author: Synopsis & Briefing Note: This document outlines how Virgin Trains East Coast is working to improve information to customers in times of disruption. Service Delivery This document details the response of Virgin Trains East Coast aligned to Project Manager the ATOC Approved Code of Practice (July 2014 version). This document also acts as a status report on Virgin Trains East Coast’s Authorised by: progress against industry recommendations. Implementation Date: 30 September 2015 Head of Service Delivery Published by the Safety & Environment Section. If printed this document is UNCONTROLLED and not subject to update. Issue Number 01 Issue Date September 2015 Contents Page Section Description 1 Document History 2 Purpose 3 Scope 4 References 5 Aims and Objectives 6 Interfaces with Network Rail 7 Compliance 8 Key Requirements 9 Definitions and Glossary Appendices A On Call Checklists B Hub /Satellite Station Information C Virgin Trains East Coast On Call Structure D Virgin Trains East Coast On Call Information Flows E Industry PIDD Action Plan F Virgin Trains East Coast Website / App Screenshot Document Local Plan for Passenger Information During Disruption (PIDD) Issue No. 01 Issue Date September 2015 Page 2 of 31 1 Document History Issue Number Page Numbers Date Amended Details Initial Issue of document aligned to ATOC ACOP 1 All September 2015 format (July 2014 version) Document Local Plan for Passenger Information During Disruption (PIDD) Issue No. 01 Issue Date September 2015 Page 3 of 31 2 Purpose The below item is provided in compliance with PIDD recommendation 41: 2.0.1 Virgin Trains East Coast recognizes the importance of providing good information to customers in order to make informed travel decisions and the needs for this to be coordinated amongst the industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Recreating the Golden Age of Rail Travel
    Features Railways and Tourism Recreating the Golden Age of Rail Travel Odette Anderson Introduction The Orient-Express Group, the epitome of luxury and style, was founded by James B. Sherwood, as a subsidiary of British Sea Containers Limited in 1976. Since then, the Group has expanded to encom- pass 16 luxury hotels in some of the most beautiful locations in the world, three ‘nostalgic’ trains (with another coming into operation at the end of 1998), a unique river cruiser, four safari lodges and two award-winning restaurants. The Golden Age of Travel In 1883, the Compagnie Internationale Venice Simplon-Orient-Express winding through Alps (VSOE) des Wagons-Lits (CIWL), founded by the Belgian engineer Georges Nagelmackers, route and, with the later addition of sleep- world, a reputation which Mr Sherwood launched its first and most famous luxury ing carriages, extended the service to has been keen to maintain. train, the Orient-Express. The Orient- Belgrade, Sofia, Athens and the famous The next major breakthrough, which has Express service set an unparalleled stan- destination of Constantinople (Istanbul), significance in today’s market, was the dard for de luxe trans-European train which has evoked so many romantic addition of the London-to-Paris sector in travel. With the opening of the Simplon novels and films. For a while, during the 1889. A beautifully appointed Pullman Tunnel at the Swiss-Italian border in heady 1920s and 30s, the Paris-Venice train made the journey from London to 1906, the Simplon-Orient-Express began sector of this service was deemed to be Dover, where passengers crossed the operating its historic Paris–Milan–Venice the most luxurious train journey in the Channel before joining Wagons-Lits car- riages in Calais to take them on to Paris.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Britain Passenger Rail: the Current Expected Timetable
    Great Britain passenger rail: the current expected timetable Franchise Current operator 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Onwards DJFMA MJJASONDJFMA MJJASONDJFMA MJJASOND South West Stagecoach West Midlands Govia East Midlands Stagecoach O I South Eastern Govia O I Wales & Borders Arriva InterCity W.C./W.C. Partnership Virgin/Stagecoach O I Cross Country Arriva OI Great Western First Group OI Apr. Chiltern Chiltern OITo Dec. 2021 To Jul. 2022 TSGN Govia O I To Sep. 2021 To Sep. 2023 East West n/a Potential development and competition period InterCity East Coast Stagecoach/Virgin To Mar. 2023 To Mar. 2024 ScotRail Abellio To Apr. 2022 To Apr. 2025 TransPennine Express First Group To Apr. 2023 To Apr. 2025 Northern Arriva To Apr. 2025 To Apr. 2026 East Anglia Abellio To Oct. 2025 To Oct. 2026 Caledonian Sleeper Serco To Apr. 2030 Essex Thameside Trenitalia To Nov. 2029 To Jun. 2030 Concession London Rail Arriva To Apr. 2024 To Apr. 2026 Tyne and Wear PTE Nexus Crossrail MTR To May 2023 To May 2025 MerseyRail Serco/Abellio To Jul. 2028 Based on publicly available information as at 1 April 2017 Key Existing franchise/concession term O OJEU notice expected Extension/direct award I ITT expected Max. length at discretion of DfT/TS Contract award expected New franchise/concession Operated by PTE Nexus Rail Finance Firm Rail Finance Firm Rail Finance Firm Rail Finance Firm Band 1 for Rail Band 1 for Rail Band 1 for Rail of the Year of the Year of the Year of the Year Finance Franchising Global Transport Global Transport Global Transport Global Transport Chambers UK 2015 The Legal 500 Chambers UK 2017 Finance 2016 Finance 2015 Finance 2014 Finance 2013 UK 2016 Stephenson Harwood LLP is a law firm of over 900 people worldwide, including 150 partners.
    [Show full text]