DOCSLIB.ORG

Archaea and Bacteria Chapter 27

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archaea and Bacteria Chapter 27 Archaea and Bacteria Chapter 27 Study the wall structure of gram positive and gram negative bacteria. Understand the functions and differences between fimbrae, pili and flagella in bacteria. Study the structure and action of bacterial flagellum. Study the organization of DNA in chromosome (nucleoid) and plasmid. Describe role of endospore and binary fission in bacteria. Explain transduction or transformation or conjugation. Important terms include F plasmid, Hfr bacterium, donor and recipient bacteria, and role of R plasmid in resistance. Study the phylogenetic tree of 3 domains and table registering characters of 3 domains. Study the table registering Major Nutritional Modes. Five Groups in Bacteria 1. Prtoeobacteria is large diverse clade of gram negative bacteria and has 5 subgroups: a. Alpha Prtoeobacteria includes many species of bacteria living inside eukaryotic organisms. Rhizobium is N-fixing bacteria in root nodules of legumes. Agrobacterium makes tumors in plant cells. Scientists use it to deliver foreign genes in cells of crop plants. Mitochondria evolved from alpha Prtoeobacteria. + - b. Beta proteobacteria is diverse group. Nitrosomonas lives in soil and converts NH4 to NO3 c. Gamma proteobacteria is another diverse group. Autotrophic sulfur bacteria Thiomargaria namibiensis, Salmonella causes food poisoning, Vibrio cholerae causes cholera and Escherichia coli lives in colon. d. Delta proteobacteria includes slime secreting myxobacteria. When soil gets dry these bacteria aggregate into fruiting body and release myxospores. Bdellobacteria attack other bacteria and bore into at great speed. e. Epsilon proteobacteria include pathogenic bacteria. Campylobacter causes blood poisoning and intestinal inflammation. Heliobacter pylori causes stomach ulcers. 2. Chlamydeas are parasites and can only survive in animal cells. Chlamydia trachomatis is most common cause of blindness in world and also causes STD, nongonococcal urethritis. 3. Spirochetes are helical heterotrophs. These use internal flagellum to rotate and locomote. Many are free living but others cause serious diseases; Treponema pallidum causes syphilis and Borrelia sps causes Lyme disease spread by ticks. 4. Cyanobacteria are unicellular or multicellular photoautotrophs. Cyanobacteria have Chlorophyll a for photosynthesis like algae and plants. Oscillatoria has a trichome of photosynthetic cells. Nostoc has mostly photosynthetic cells but also Heterocysts, swollen cells that fix atmospheric N2 to NH3. In Anabena photosynthetic cells and Heterocysts undergo metabolic cooperation by exchanging materials produced by them. Cyanobacteria are among most nutritionally independent organisms and are pioneers (first colonizers) to colonize bare places like rocks. 5. Gram Positive Bacteria rival the proteobacteria in diversity. 1 a. Actinomycetes form colonies having branched fungus like bodies and like them form chains of spores. Most of them are free living decomposers in soil and are responsible for earthy odor of rich soil. Pharmaceutical companies cultivate Streptomycetes to procure many antibiotics (bactericidal drugs). Two species of actinomycetes cause tuberculosis and leprosy. b. Gram positive bacteria include solitary species like Bacillus anthracis which causes Anthrax and Clostridium botulinum which causes food poisoning. Streptococcus and Staphylococcus are gram +. c. Mycoplasmas have the smallest cells (0.1μm diameter). Mycoplasmas are only known bacteria without cell walls. These have very small genomes (517 genes in Mycoplasma genitalium). Many are free living soil bacteria but others are pathogens. ARCHAEA: multiple kingdoms a. These prokaryotic organisms of ancient origin discovered first living in extreme environments. b. Archaea lack peptidoglycan in cell wall. c. Like bacteria archaea are prokaryotes, divide by fission and have circular DNA. d. Like Eukarya, some Archaea have histones associated with DNA e. Introns in genes and many kinds of RNA polymerases f. Their growth is not slowed by antibiotics like streptomycin or chloramphenicol. These include: Extremophiles: 6. Halophiles – these can tolerate very high concentrations of salts (Greek halo means salt) and live in places like the Great Salt Lake and the Dead Sea. Some can tolerate high salinity but others need many times salinity than sea water (3.5%) and die if gets lower. Halobacterium dies below 9% salinity. These have special proteins and cell wall to tolerate high salinity. 7. Thermophiles – these can tolerate very high temperatures >90⁰C. These have branched hydrocarbons in cell membrane. Sulfolobus archaea live in sulfur rich volcanic springs at 90⁰C. Geogemma barossi lives at 121⁰C around hydrothermal vents. Ordinary organisms die at high temperatures because their DNA loses its double helical structure and proteins get denatured and lose their important functions. DNA polymerase from archaea is used in PCR technology to magnify concentration of desired DNA. Moderate Archaea: are archaea living at normal conditions of temperature or salinity. Methanogens – These use CO2 as source of oxygen to oxidize H2 and produce methane, CH4, the marsh gas as bye-product in marshes. Other species live in gut of cattle, termites or other herbivores. Methanogens are strict anaerobes and very little amount of O2 kills them. 8. Euryarchaeota (Eury = wide range) include most extreme halophiles and methanogens and also some extreme thermophiles. 9. Crenarchaeota (Cren = spring) include most extreme thermophiles. 10. Recently many species of both euryarchaeota and crenarchaeota have been discovered in ordinary habitats like farm soil, lake sediments or surface waters in open seas. 11. New clades discovered recently include Nanoarchaeota, very tiny archaea in hydrothermal vents and other habitats. Korarchaeota discovered in hot springs in yellow stone national park do not seem to belong to either euryarchaeota or crenarchaeota. 2 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geomicrobiological Processes in Extreme Environments: a Review
    202 Articles by Hailiang Dong1, 2 and Bingsong Yu1,3 Geomicrobiological processes in extreme environments: A review 1 Geomicrobiology Laboratory, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, 100083, China. 2 Department of Geology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, 45056, USA. Email: [email protected] 3 School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, 100083, China. The last decade has seen an extraordinary growth of and Mancinelli, 2001). These unique conditions have selected Geomicrobiology. Microorganisms have been studied in unique microorganisms and novel metabolic functions. Readers are directed to recent review papers (Kieft and Phelps, 1997; Pedersen, numerous extreme environments on Earth, ranging from 1997; Krumholz, 2000; Pedersen, 2000; Rothschild and crystalline rocks from the deep subsurface, ancient Mancinelli, 2001; Amend and Teske, 2005; Fredrickson and Balk- sedimentary rocks and hypersaline lakes, to dry deserts will, 2006). A recent study suggests the importance of pressure in the origination of life and biomolecules (Sharma et al., 2002). In and deep-ocean hydrothermal vent systems. In light of this short review and in light of some most recent developments, this recent progress, we review several currently active we focus on two specific aspects: novel metabolic functions and research frontiers: deep continental subsurface micro- energy sources. biology, microbial ecology in saline lakes, microbial Some metabolic functions of continental subsurface formation of dolomite, geomicrobiology in dry deserts, microorganisms fossil DNA and its use in recovery of paleoenviron- Because of the unique geochemical, hydrological, and geological mental conditions, and geomicrobiology of oceans. conditions of the deep subsurface, microorganisms from these envi- Throughout this article we emphasize geomicrobiological ronments are different from surface organisms in their metabolic processes in these extreme environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Dominio Archaea
    FILOGENIA DE LOS SERES VIVOS: DOMINIO ARCHAEA Nuria Garzón Pinto Facultad de Farmacia Universidad de Sevilla Septiembre de 2017 FILOGENIA DE LOS SERES VIVOS: DOMINIO ARCHAEA TRABAJO FIN DE GRADO Nuria Garzón Pinto Tutores: Antonio Ventosa Ucero y Cristina Sánchez-Porro Álvarez Tipología del trabajo: Revisión bibliográfica Grado en Farmacia. Facultad de Farmacia Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología (Área de Microbiología) Universidad de Sevilla Sevilla, septiembre de 2017 RESUMEN A lo largo de la historia, la clasificación de los seres vivos ha ido variando en función de las diversas aportaciones científicas que se iban proponiendo, y la historia evolutiva de los organismos ha sido durante mucho tiempo algo que no se lograba conocer con claridad. Actualmente, gracias sobre todo a las ideas aportadas por Carl Woese y colaboradores, se sabe que los seres vivos se clasifican en 3 dominios (Bacteria, Eukarya y Archaea) y se conocen las herramientas que nos permiten realizar estudios filogenéticos, es decir, estudiar el origen de las especies. La herramienta principal, y en base a la cual se ha realizado la clasificación actual es el ARNr 16S. Sin embargo, hoy día sedispone de otros métodos que ayudan o complementan los análisis de la evolución de los seres vivos. En este trabajo se analiza cómo surgió el dominio Archaea, se describen las características y aspectos más importantes de las especies este grupo y se compara con el resto de dominios (Bacteria y Eukarya). Las arqueas han despertado un gran interés científico y han sido investigadas sobre todo por su capacidad para adaptarse y desarrollarse en ambientes extremos.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (PDF)
    a 50 40 DSB 30 DSS HSB OTUs 20 10 HSS 0 REB 0 20406080RES Number of clones 20 DSB b 15 DSS 10 HSB OTUs 5 HSS 0 REB 0 204060 RES Number of clones Fig. S1. Rarefaction curves for bacterial (a) and archaeal (b) clone libraries. 1 Fig. S2. Communities clustered using normalized weighted-UniFrac PCA for bacterial communities (a). Each point represents an individual sample. 2 a b Jaccard Chao cd Jaccard Chao Fig. S3. Communities clustered using multidimensional scaling method for bacterial (a and b, Jaccard- and Chao-indices, respectively) and archaeal communities (c and d, Jaccard- and Chao-indices, respectively). Each point represents an individual sample. 3 Table S1. Summary of archaeal 16S rRNA gene clone sequences identified from the Yamagawa coastal hydrothermal field. Number of clones Pylogenetic group Representative clone Closest match (NCBI BLAST) Source Accession no. Similarity (%) HSS HSB DSS DSB RES REB Crenarchaeota Desulfurococcacae DSB_A38 1 Aeropyrum camini strain SY1 deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimney NR_040973 95 HSB_A50 1 Aeropyrum camini strain SY1 deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimney NR_040973 95 HSB_A77 6 Aeropyrum camini strain SY1 deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimney NR_040973 96 HSS_A02 1 10 Aeropyrum camini strain SY1 deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimney NR_040973 97 HSB_A38 2 clone HTM1036Pn-A124 microbial mats on polychaete nests at the Hatoma Knoll AB611454 99 HSB_A68 1 clone HTM1036Pn-A124 microbial mats on polychaete nests at the Hatoma Knoll AB611454 93 Pyrodictiaceae HSB_A20 2 Geogemma indica strain 296 deep-sea hydrothermal vent sulfide chimney DQ492260 98 HSB_A46 1 clone TOTO-A1-15 Pacific Ocean, Mariana Volcanic Arc AB167480 95 HSB_A23 1 clone F99a113 nascent hydrothermal chimney DQ228527 99 Thermoproteaceae HSB_A18 3 Pyrobaculum aerophilum str.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbiology and Geochemistry of Smith Creek and Grass Valley Hot
    Journal of Earth Science, Vol. 21, Special Issue, p. 315–318, June 2010 ISSN 1674-487X Printed in China Microbiology and Geochemistry of Smith Creek and Grass Valley Hot Springs: Emerging Evidence for Wide Distribution of Novel Thermophilic Lineages in the US Great Basin Jeremy A Dodsworth, Brian P Hedlund* School of Life Sciences, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, 89154, USA INTRODUCTION the Southern Smith Creek Valley springs region and The endorheic Great Basin (GB) region in the GVS1 is just southeast of Hot Spring Point, as desig- western US is host to a variety of non-acidic geother- nated by the Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology mal spring systems. Heating of the majority of these website (http://www.nbmg.unr.edu/geothermal/ systems is due to their association with range-front gthome. tm). Sample collection, DNA extraction, field faults, in contrast to caldera-associated hot springs in measurements and water chemistry analysis were per- systems such as Yellowstone National Park and formed with source pool samples essentially as de- Kamchatka (Faulds et al., 2006). Previous characteri- scribed (Vick et al., 2010). 16S rRNA gene libraries zation of two geothermal systems in the GB, Great were constructed using PCR forward primers 9bF Boiling/Mud Hot springs (Costa et al., 2009) and Lit- (specific for Bacteria; L2) or 8aF (specific for Ar- tle Hot Creek (Vick et al., 2010), indicated that they chaea; L4) in conjunction with reverse primer 1406uR host several novel deep lineages of potentially abun- as described in Costa et al. (2009). 48 clones from dant Bacteria and Archaea.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing and Classifying Prokaryotes
    PowerPoint® Lecture Presentations prepared by Mindy Miller-Kittrell, North Carolina State University C H A P T E R 11 Characterizing and Classifying Prokaryotes © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Bacteria as Plastic Recyclers http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/11/world/b acteria-discovery-plastic/index.html http://www.the- scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/4 5556/title/Microbial-Recycler-Found/ © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. General Characteristics of Prokaryotic Organisms • Reproduction of Prokaryotic Cells • All reproduce asexually • Three main methods • Binary fission (most common) • Snapping division • Budding © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 11.3 Binary fission. 1 Cell replicates its DNA. Cell wall Cytoplasmic Nucleoid membrane Replicated DNA 2 The cytoplasmic membrane elongates, separating DNA molecules. 3 Cross wall forms; membrane invaginates. 4 Cross wall forms completely. 5 Daughter cells may separate. © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 11.4 Snapping division, a variation of binary fission. Older, outer portion of cell wall Newer, inner portion of cell wall Rupture of older, outer wall Hinge © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 11.6 Budding Parent cell retains its identity © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. General Characteristics of Prokaryotic Organisms • Arrangements of Prokaryotic Cells • Result from two aspects of division during binary fission • Planes in which cells divide • Separation of daughter cells © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 11.7 Arrangements of cocci. Plane of division Diplococci Streptococci Tetrads Sarcinae Staphylococci © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 11.8 Arrangements of bacilli. Single bacillus Diplobacilli Streptobacilli Palisade V-shape © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Modern Prokaryotic Classification • Currently based on genetic relatedness of rRNA sequences • Three domains • Archaea • Bacteria • Eukarya © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Appl
    University of Massachusetts Amherst From the SelectedWorks of Derek Lovley November 2, 2007 Growth of Thermophilic and Hyperthermophilic Fe(III)-Reducing Microorganisms on a Ferruginous Smectite as the Sole Electron Acceptor Derek Lovley, University of Massachusetts - Amherst Kazem Kashefi Evgenya S Shelobolina W. Crawford Elliott Available at: https://works.bepress.com/derek_lovley/100/ Growth of Thermophilic and Hyperthermophilic Fe(III)-Reducing Microorganisms on a Ferruginous Smectite as the Sole Electron Acceptor Kazem Kashefi, Evgenya S. Shelobolina, W. Crawford Elliott and Derek R. Lovley Downloaded from Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74(1):251. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01580-07. Published Ahead of Print 2 November 2007. Updated information and services can be found at: http://aem.asm.org/ http://aem.asm.org/content/74/1/251 These include: REFERENCES This article cites 53 articles, 28 of which can be accessed free at: http://aem.asm.org/content/74/1/251#ref-list-1 on March 14, 2013 by Univ of Massachusetts Amherst CONTENT ALERTS Receive: RSS Feeds, eTOCs, free email alerts (when new articles cite this article), more» Information about commercial reprint orders: http://journals.asm.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml To subscribe to to another ASM Journal go to: http://journals.asm.org/site/subscriptions/ APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, Jan. 2008, p. 251–258 Vol. 74, No. 1 0099-2240/08/$08.00ϩ0 doi:10.1128/AEM.01580-07 Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Growth of Thermophilic and Hyperthermophilic Fe(III)-Reducing Microorganisms on a Ferruginous Smectite as the Sole Electron Acceptorᰔ Kazem Kashefi,1* Evgenya S.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbial Distribution in Different Spatial Positions Within the Walls of a Black Sulfide Hydrothermal Chimney
    Vol. 508: 67–85, 2014 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published August 4 doi: 10.3354/meps10841 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Microbial distribution in different spatial positions within the walls of a black sulfide hydrothermal chimney Jiangtao Li1, Huaiyang Zhou1,*, Jiasong Fang1,2,*, Yannan Sun1, Shamik Dasgupta1 1State Key Laboratory of Marine Geology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, PR China 2Department of Natural Sciences, Hawaii Pacific University, Kaneohe, Hawaii 96744, USA ABSTRACT: Deep-sea hydrothermal chimneys encompass diverse niches for different micro- bial communities with steep environmental gradients. An active sulfide hydrothermal structure was recovered from the Dudley site of the Main Endeavour Field in the Juan de Fuca Ridge. Subsamples were taken from different spatial positions within the chimney wall and analyzed for mineral composition and microbial biomass and community structure to illustrate the char- acteristics of microbial distribution and environmental constraints. Mineral analysis showed that the chimney was mainly composed of various Fe-, Zn-, and Cu-rich sulfides, with mineral composition and abundance varying with spatial position. Microbial populations in the chimney predominantly consisted of archaeal members affiliated with the deep-sea hydrothermal vent Euryarchaeota group, Thermococcales, and Desulfurococcales, as well as bacterial members of the Gamma-, Epsilon-, and Deltaproteobacteria. Microbial biomass and composition shifted dramatically and formed different microbial zones within the chimney walls, from predomi- nantly mesophilic, sulfur-oxidizing bacterial communities at the outer surfaces to thermophilic or hyperthermophilic, archaeal sulfur-reducers in the inner layers of the chimney. Based on microbial physiological characteristics and their distribution profiles, we inferred that tempera- ture, fluid geochemistry, and organic compounds probably play an important role in selecting for and sustaining microbial communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Isolation, Characterization, and Ecology
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, Oct. 2007, p. 6669–6677 Vol. 73, No. 20 0099-2240/07/$08.00ϩ0 doi:10.1128/AEM.01321-07 Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Isolation, Characterization, and Ecology of Sulfur-Respiring Crenarchaea Inhabiting Acid-Sulfate-Chloride-Containing Geothermal Springs in Yellowstone National Parkᰔ† Eric S. Boyd,1* Robert A. Jackson,1 Gem Encarnacion,1 James A. Zahn,2‡ Trevor Beard,1 William D. Leavitt,1,3 Yundan Pi,4 Chuanlun L. Zhang,4 Ann Pearson,3 and Gill G. Geesey1 Department of Microbiology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 597171; DowAgro Sciences, Indianapolis, Indiana 462682; Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 021383; and Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina 298024 Received 13 June 2007/Accepted 13 August 2007 Elemental sulfur (S0) is associated with many geochemically diverse hot springs, yet little is known about the phylogeny, physiology, and ecology of the organisms involved in its cycling. Here we report the isolation, characterization, and ecology of two novel, S0-reducing Crenarchaea from an acid geothermal spring referred to as Dragon Spring. Isolate 18U65 grows optimally at 70 to 72°C and at pH 2.5 to 3.0, while isolate 18D70 grows optimally at 81°C and pH 3.0. Both isolates are chemoorganotrophs, dependent on complex peptide- containing carbon sources, S0, and anaerobic conditions for respiration-dependent growth. Glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (GDGTs) containing four to six cyclopentyl rings were present in the lipid fraction of isolates 18U65 and 18D70. Physiological characterization suggests that the isolates are adapted to the phys- icochemical conditions of Dragon Spring and can utilize the natural organic matter in the spring as a carbon and energy source.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing and Classifying Prokaryotes
    PowerPoint® Lecture Presentations prepared by Mindy Miller-Kittrell, North Carolina State University C H A P T E R 11 Characterizing and Classifying Prokaryotes © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. General Characteristics of Prokaryotic Organisms • Reproduction of Prokaryotic Cells • All reproduce asexually • Three main methods • Binary fission (most common) • Snapping division • Budding © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 11.3 Binary fission. 1 Cell replicates its DNA. Cell wall Cytoplasmic Nucleoid membrane Replicated DNA 2 The cytoplasmic membrane elongates, separating DNA molecules. 3 Cross wall forms; membrane invaginates. 4 Cross wall forms completely. 5 Daughter cells may separate. © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 11.4 Snapping division, a variation of binary fission. Older, outer portion of cell wall Newer, inner portion of cell wall Rupture of older, outer wall Hinge © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 11.6 Budding Parent cell retains its identity © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. General Characteristics of Prokaryotic Organisms • Arrangements of Prokaryotic Cells • Result from two aspects of division during binary fission • Planes in which cells divide • Separation of daughter cells © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 11.7 Arrangements of cocci. Plane of division Diplococci Streptococci Tetrads Sarcinae Staphylococci © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 11.8 Arrangements of bacilli. Single bacillus Diplobacilli Streptobacilli Palisade V-shape © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Modern Prokaryotic Classification • Currently based
    [Show full text]
  • Microorganisms from Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vents
    Marine Life Science & Technology (2021) 3:204–230 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42995-020-00086-4 REVIEW Microorganisms from deep‑sea hydrothermal vents Xiang Zeng1,3 · Karine Alain2,3 · Zongze Shao1,3 Received: 23 June 2020 / Accepted: 17 November 2020 / Published online: 22 January 2021 © Ocean University of China 2021 Abstract With a rich variety of chemical energy sources and steep physical and chemical gradients, hydrothermal vent systems ofer a range of habitats to support microbial life. Cultivation-dependent and independent studies have led to an emerging view that diverse microorganisms in deep-sea hydrothermal vents live their chemolithoautotrophic, heterotrophic, or mixotrophic life with versatile metabolic strategies. Biogeochemical processes are mediated by microorganisms, and notably, processes involving or coupling the carbon, sulfur, hydrogen, nitrogen, and metal cycles in these unique ecosystems. Here, we review the taxonomic and physiological diversity of microbial prokaryotic life from cosmopolitan to endemic taxa and emphasize their signifcant roles in the biogeochemical processes in deep-sea hydrothermal vents. According to the physiology of the targeted taxa and their needs inferred from meta-omics data, the media for selective cultivation can be designed with a wide range of physicochemical conditions such as temperature, pH, hydrostatic pressure, electron donors and acceptors, carbon sources, nitrogen sources, and growth factors. The application of novel cultivation techniques with real-time monitoring of microbial diversity and metabolic substrates and products are also recommended. Keywords Deep-sea hydrothermal vents · Cultivation · Diversity · Biogeochemical cycle Introduction hydrothermal plumes (∼2 °C), low-temperature hydrother- mal fuids (∼5–100 °C), high-temperature hydrothermal The discovery of deep-sea hydrothermal vents in the late fuids (∼150–400 °C), sulfde rock, basalt, and pelagic and 1970s expanded our knowledge of the extent of life on Earth metalliferous sediments.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbe-Mineral Relationships and Biogenic Mineral Transformations in Actively Venting Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Sulfide Chimneys
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses Spring August 2014 MICROBE-MINERAL RELATIONSHIPS AND BIOGENIC MINERAL TRANSFORMATIONS IN ACTIVELY VENTING DEEP-SEA HYDROTHERMAL SULFIDE CHIMNEYS TZIHSUAN J. LIN University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Biogeochemistry Commons, and the Environmental Microbiology and Microbial Ecology Commons Recommended Citation LIN, TZIHSUAN J., "MICROBE-MINERAL RELATIONSHIPS AND BIOGENIC MINERAL TRANSFORMATIONS IN ACTIVELY VENTING DEEP-SEA HYDROTHERMAL SULFIDE CHIMNEYS" (2014). Doctoral Dissertations. 110. https://doi.org/10.7275/dqch-0n18 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/110 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MICROBE-MINERAL RELATIONSHIPS AND BIOGENIC MINERAL TRANSFORMATIONS IN ACTIVELY VENTING DEEP-SEA HYDROTHERMAL SULFIDE CHIMNEYS A Dissertation Presented by TZI-HSUAN JENNIFER LIN Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2014 Microbiology Department © Copyright by Tzi-Hsuan Jennifer Lin 2014 All Rights Reserved MICROBE-MINERAL RELATIONSHIPS
    [Show full text]
  • Bacterial and Archaeal Diversity in an Iron-Rich Coastal Hydrothermal Field in Yamagawa, Kagoshima, Japan
    Microbes Environ. Vol. 28, No. 4, 405–413, 2013 https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/browse/jsme2 doi:10.1264/jsme2.ME13048 Bacterial and Archaeal Diversity in an Iron-Rich Coastal Hydrothermal Field in Yamagawa, Kagoshima, Japan SATOSHI KAWAICHI1, NORIHIRO ITO1, TAKASHI YOSHIDA1, and YOSHIHIKO SAKO1* 1Laboratory of Marine Microbiology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606–8502, Japan (Received April 8, 2013—Accepted July 20, 2013—Published online November 21, 2013) Physicochemical characteristics and archaeal and bacterial community structures in an iron-rich coastal hydrothermal field, where the temperature of the most active hot spot reaches above 100°C, were investigated to obtain fundamental information on microbes inhabiting a coastal hydrothermal field. The environmental settings of the coastal hydrothermal field were similar in some degree to those of deep-sea hydrothermal environments because of its emission of H2, CO2, and sulfide from the bottom of the hot spot. The results of clone analyses based on the 16S rRNA gene led us to speculate the presence of a chemo-synthetic microbial ecosystem, where chemolithoautotrophic thermophiles, primarily the bacterial order Aquificales, function as primary producers using H2 or sulfur compounds as their energy source and CO2 as their carbon source, and the organic compounds synthesized by them support the growth of chemoheterotrophic thermophiles, such as members of the order Thermales and the family Desulfurococcaceae. In addition, the dominance of members of the bacterial genus Herbaspirillum in the high temperature bottom layer led us to speculate the temporal formation of mesophilic zones where they can also function as primary producing or nitrogen-fixing bacteria.
    [Show full text]