DOCSLIB.ORG

US Foreign Assistance to the Middle East

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
US Foreign Assistance to the Middle East U.S. Foreign Assistance to the Middle East: Historical Background, Recent Trends, and the FY2022 Request Updated September 7, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46344 SUMMARY R46344 U.S. Foreign Assistance to the Middle East: September 7, 2021 Historical Background, Recent Trends, and the Jeremy M. Sharp FY2022 Request Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs This report is an overview of U.S. foreign assistance to the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). It includes a brief historical review of foreign aid levels, a description of specific Carla E. Humud country programs, and analysis of current foreign aid issues. It also provides analysis of the Analyst in Middle Eastern Administration’s FY2022 budget request for State Department and U.S. Agency for International Affairs Development (USAID) Foreign Operations and Related Programs (SFOPS) appropriations in the MENA region. Sarah R. Collins The foreign aid data in this report are compiled by the Congressional Research Service from a Research Assistant number of resources, including USAID’s U.S. Overseas Loans and Grants (also known as the “Greenbook”), CRS communications with the State Department and USAID, executive branch agencies’ notifications to Congress, and annual State Department and USAID Congressional Budget Justifications. For foreign aid terminology and abbreviations, see Appendix A. Since 1946, the United States has provided an estimated total of $351 billion (obligations in current dollars) in foreign assistance to the MENA region. For FY2022, overall aid requested for the MENA region amounts to $7.6 billion, or about 13% of the State Department’s International Affairs budget request. The State Department estimates that the Middle East stands to receive 39% of the geographically specific assistance in the overall budget request, more than any other region. As in previous years, assistance for Israel, Egypt, and Jordan constitute the majority of the Middle East funding request. The region also receives a sizable portion of annual humanitarian assistance appropriations, which are not included in the region- specific aid figures. The Biden Administration’s FY2022 request of $7.6 billion for the MENA region is $0.1 billion more than what Congress appropriated for FY2021 ($7.5 billion) and approximately $1.1 billion more than the previous Administration’s request for FY2021 ($6.5 billion). Congress regularly appropriated more in foreign assistance than the Trump Administration requested. Of the total FY2022 request, the Administration is seeking $1.9 billion (25%) in bilateral economic assistance. Another point of departure between the two Administration requests concerns the Palestinians. In the spring of 2021, the Biden Administration resumed various forms of aid to the Palestinians that had been discontinued under the Trump Administration. For FY2022, the Biden Administration is requesting a total of $219 million in bilateral aid for the Palestinians, which its budget justification asserts will further “the Administration's goals for peace and stability in the region.” In order to more accurately compare the Administration’s FY2022 foreign assistance request to previous years' appropriations, aid figures in this report (except where otherwise indicated) refer only to funding that is administered by the State Department or USAID and requested for individual countries or regional programs. While this represents the majority of U.S. assistance to the Middle East, several other sources of U.S. aid to the region exist, such as Transition Initiatives (TI) and the aforementioned humanitarian aid provided through the Food for Peace Act, Title II (FFP), International Disaster Assistance (IDA), and Migration and Refugee Assistance (MRA) accounts. Other U.S. federal entities—such as the Departments of Defense, Commerce, and the Treasury, and the Millennium Challenge Corporation—administer additional types of assistance. Funding for such activities is generally not requested for individual countries and regions, and it is largely excluded here. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to severe public health and economic consequences in the Middle East and North Africa region, in many cases exacerbating the region’s numerous pre-existing challenges. In April 2021, the Biden Administration stated that it had allocated over $225 million in emergency humanitarian assistance to the region in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Congressional Research Service U.S. Foreign Assistance to the Middle East Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Foreign Aid to Support Key U.S. Policy Goals ............................................................................... 2 COVID-19 in the MENA Region .................................................................................................... 5 Economic Impact ...................................................................................................................... 5 Selected U.S. Government Responses ...................................................................................... 6 The Biden Administration’s FY2022 Aid Budget Request for the MENA Region ......................... 7 Selected Country Summaries ........................................................................................................ 10 Israel ........................................................................................................................................ 10 Egypt ........................................................................................................................................ 11 Jordan ...................................................................................................................................... 12 Iraq .......................................................................................................................................... 13 Tunisia ..................................................................................................................................... 14 Lebanon ................................................................................................................................... 15 Regional Program Aid ................................................................................................................... 16 Funding for Complex Humanitarian Crises .................................................................................. 17 Select Foreign Aid Issues .............................................................................................................. 19 Resumption of U.S. Aid to the Palestinians ............................................................................ 19 Lebanon’s Economic Crisis .................................................................................................... 20 Stabilization in Areas Liberated from the Islamic State .......................................................... 21 Human Rights and Foreign Aid to MENA .............................................................................. 23 FY2022 MENA Legislative Summary .......................................................................................... 25 Figures Figure 1. FY2022 Request for Regional Bilateral Aid .................................................................... 1 Figure 2. U.S. Foreign Aid to MENA Countries: FY1946-FY2019 ................................................ 2 Figure 3. Bilateral MENA Aid Budget Requests vs. Appropriations: FY2018-FY2022 ................. 8 Figure 4. U.S. Cash Transfers to Jordan ........................................................................................ 12 Figure 5. Select U.S. Humanitarian Funding to Certain Middle East Crises ................................ 18 Tables Table 1. U.S. Bilateral Aid to MENA Countries: FY2017 - FY2022 .............................................. 9 Table 2. Bilateral Aid to Israel ....................................................................................................... 10 Table 3. Bilateral Aid to Egypt ....................................................................................................... 11 Table 4. Bilateral Aid to Jordan ..................................................................................................... 12 Table 5. Bilateral Aid to Iraq ......................................................................................................... 13 Table 6. Bilateral Aid to Tunisia .................................................................................................... 14 Table 7. Bilateral Aid to Lebanon .................................................................................................. 15 Table 8. Relief and Recovery Fund ............................................................................................... 22 Table 9. FY2022 MENA Foreign Operations Appropriations ....................................................... 26 Congressional Research Service U.S. Foreign Assistance to the Middle East Appendixes Appendix A. Common Foreign Assistance Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................... 29 Contacts Author Information ........................................................................................................................ 30 Congressional Research Service U.S. Foreign Assistance to the Middle East Introduction This report
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 6 Balkanism in Political Context
    Balkanism in Political Context: From the Ottoman Empire to the EU Andrew Hammond Swansea Institute, University of Wales Keywords: Balkanism, Eastern Europe, Travel Writing, European Union, Ottoman Empire Abstract This article investigates the British tradition of balkanism, paying particular attention to the forms of power that representation of South-East Europe has supported. Using travel writing as a source material, I shall exemplify the tradition through the study of two periods in which balkanist discourse – with its motifs of discord, savagery, backwardness and obfuscation – has been especially powerful. During the nineteenth century, firstly, such discourse legitimised British assistance for the Ottoman Empire against the threat of Russian expansion. In contemporary times, secondly, the denigration of the entire Central and Eastern European region has worked to endorse the systematic interference of the European Union. For the Balkans, this has entailed wide-ranging EU control of economic structures and political frameworks, repeating the nineteenth-century concept of the peninsula as a borderland available for Western intervention and control. Introduction The debate about what the term ‘Europe’ signifies has acquired increasing urgency in recent years. Since the end of the Cold War, questions about the nature and constitution of European civilisation – what it believes, what its borders are, what you need to get in – have become a staple ingredient of political speeches, newspaper editorials and academic publications. Far from reassuring Western European populations, the defeat of communism seems to have initiated a profound crisis of identity. On the one hand, commentators have outlined the difficulties of defining this small, multifarious, expansionist region that is, after all, merely an appendage to the vast continental landmass of Eurasia.
    [Show full text]
  • Nile Valley-Levant Interactions: an Eclectic Review
    Nile Valley-Levant interactions: an eclectic review The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Bar-Yosef, Ofer. 2013. Nile Valley-Levant interactions: an eclectic review. In Neolithisation of Northeastern Africa, ed. Noriyuki Shirai. Studies in Early Near Eastern Production, Subsistence, and Environment 16: 237-247. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:31887680 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP In: N. Shirai (ed.) Neolithization of Northeastern Africa. Studies in Early Near Eastern: Production, Subsistence, & Environment 16, ex oriente: Berlin. pp. 237-247. Nile Valley-Levant interactions: an eclectic review Ofer Bar-Yosef Department of Anthropology, Harvard University Opening remarks Writing a review of a prehistoric province as an outsider is not a simple task. The archaeological process, as we know today, is an integration of data sets – the information from the field and the laboratory analyses, and the interpretation that depends on the paradigm held by the writer affected by his or her personal experience. Even monitoring the contents of most of the published and online literature is a daunting task. It is particularly true for looking at the Egyptian Neolithic during the transition from foraging to farming and herding, when most of the difficulties originate from the poorly known bridging regions. A special hurdle is the terminological conundrum of the Neolithic, as Andrew Smith and Alison Smith discusses in this volume, and in particular the term “Neolithisation” that finally made its way to the Levantine literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Africa Western Asia Fact Sheet MA
    Arab States and Northern Africa fact sheet – 2020 GEM Report Please note that this factsheet only contains some of the mentions from the region. The full Report and all regional mentions can be found here: Bit.ly/2020gemreport Embargo : 23 June Headline statistic: 20% of countries in the region did not target the marginalised in their education response to Covid-19 Persistent exclusion • 17 million children and youth are entirely excluded from education in the region, with poverty the main constraint to access. • The stateless bidoon in the Gulf countries have difficulty gaining access to education • Pre-primary: Djibouti has the world’s lowest early childhood education participation rate. Morocco lacks a public pre-primary education system; the share of private institutions, mostly attached to mosques, in total enrolment was 87% in 2018, and enrolment levels have stagnated over the past two decades. • Refugees are taught in parallel education systems. Sahrawi refugees in Algeria have a separate education system and curriculum. Malian refugees in refugee camps in Mauritania still follow the Malian curriculum • Exclusion can happen inside school walls as well: In Yemen, children of the Muhamasheen, a historically marginalized social group associated with garbage collection, face persistent discrimination, abuse by teachers and bullying by peers • Over 30% of children feel like outsiders in school in Jordan and Qatar • 57% of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth felt unsafe in school Inequitable foundations: Alongside today’s new Report, the GEM Report has launched a new website, PEER, with descriptions of laws and policies on inclusion in education for every country in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade and Commerce at Sepphoris, Israel
    Illinois Wesleyan University Digital Commons @ IWU Honors Projects Sociology and Anthropology 1998 Trade and Commerce at Sepphoris, Israel Sarah VanSickle '98 Illinois Wesleyan University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/socanth_honproj Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation VanSickle '98, Sarah, "Trade and Commerce at Sepphoris, Israel" (1998). Honors Projects. 19. https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/socanth_honproj/19 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Commons @ IWU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this material in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This material has been accepted for inclusion by Faculty at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. Trade and Commerce At Sepphoris, Israel Sarah VanSickle 1998 Honors Research Dr. Dennis E. Groh, Advisor I Introduction Trade patterns in the Near East are the subject of conflicting interpretations. Researchers debate whether Galilean cities utilized trade routes along the Sea of Galilee and the Mediterranean or were self-sufficient, with little access to trade. An analysis of material culture found at specific sites can most efficiently determine the extent of trade in the region. If commerce is extensive, a significant assemblage of foreign goods will be found; an overwhelming majority of provincial artifacts will suggest minimal trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Misconceptions and Stereotypes About the Middle East
    Common Misconceptions and Stereotypes about the Middle East The Middle East does not have clear-cut boundaries. There are cross-cultural connections that stretch from North Africa through Western Asia into Central Asia. The most basic map of the Middle The Middle East is a clearly defined East includes Bahrain, Cyprus, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, the Palestinian Territories, Qatar, Saudi place. Arabia, Syria, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, and Yemen. People in the Middle East live as nomads. Very few people in the Middle East live as nomads. The Middle East is quite urbanized and has some of the oldest cities in the world. There is nothing but desert and oil in 60% of the region’s population lives in major cities such as the Middle East. Damascus, Istanbul and Cairo. Ancient Middle Eastern kingdoms such as Sumer, Babylon and Egypt were all cradles for western The Middle East and the Islamic World civilization. are the same. Everyone in the Middle East speaks There is more than desert and oil in the Middle East. The geography of the Middle East is diverse and includes everything from fertile Arabic. river deltas and forests, to mountain ranges and arid plateaus. Some Everyone in the Middle East is Muslim. countries in the Middle East are oil rich, while others have little or no All Arabs are Muslim. oil reserves. Violence in the Middle East is The Middle East and the Islamic World are not the same. While inevitable. Islam first developed in the Arabian Peninsula and Arabic is its Everyone in the Middle East hates the liturgical language, the majority of the world’s Muslims are not Arab and live outside the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation and Climate History of the Southern Levant During the Last 30,000 Years Based on Palynological Investigation
    Vegetation and climate history of the southern Levant during the last 30,000 years based on palynological investigation Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades (Dr. rer. nat.) der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität zu Bonn vorgelegt von Vera Schiebel aus Troisdorf Bonn, März 2013 Angefertigt mit Genehmigung der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Thomas Litt 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Dietmar Quandt Tag des Promotionskolloquium: 06. Juni 2013 Erscheinungsjahr: 2013 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Current state of research 6 2.1 Paleoclimate since the Last Glacial Maximum 6 2.2 Paleo-vegetation in the Levant 7 2.3 Settlement history in the Levant 8 3 Area of work 11 3.1 Topography 12 3.2 Geology 14 3.3 Modern climate conditions 15 3.4 Vegetation 18 3.5 Coring Sites 22 4 Material and methods 24 4.1 Coring campaign 24 4.2 Lake Kinneret 24 4.3 Birkat Ram 31 4.4 Reconstruction of vegetation based on pollen data 37 4.5 Dating of Late Pleistocene/Holocene lake sediments 38 5 Results 41 5.1 Lake Kinneret 41 5.2 Birkat Ram 47 6 Discussion 56 6.1 The Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) 56 6.2 The Late Glacial 58 6.3 The Younger Dryas (YD) 60 6.4 The Holocene 61 7 Summary 72 8 Zusammenfassung 74 9 Résumé 76 10 Appendix 78 11 Table of figures and charts 89 12 References 90 1 Introduction Understanding the relations between variations of paleo-climate and its effects on the paleo-vegetation is of particular interest to a broad range of scientific disciplines.
    [Show full text]
  • Water and Insecurity in the Levant by Ido Bar and Gerald Stang
    15 2016 Rafael Ben-Ari/Cham/NEWSCOM/SIPA Ben-Ari/Cham/NEWSCOM/SIPA Rafael Water and insecurity in the Levant by Ido Bar and Gerald Stang The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) is a series of multi-year droughts, leading to increased the most water-stressed area in the world. In the stress on groundwater reserves. A 2016 NASA study Levant sub-region, Jordan, Syria, West Bank/Gaza, calculated that 1998-2012 was the driest period to and Israel are already water scarce while two other strike the region in 900 years. countries – Iraq and Lebanon – are ‘water stressed’. This water challenge is a major problem for more This drought has had a serious impact on regional than simple development reasons – the domestic economies, particularly in the agricultural sector: instability that led into the Syria conflict was par- the number of people employed in agriculture has tially driven by drought effects, and now the over- plummeted, as has the portion of population living flow of refugees is placing greater stress on dry in rural areas and the contribution of agriculture neighbours. to the economy. These trends are global, but have been accelerated in the Levant, most notably in For a region that is expected to become drier yet Syria, where an estimated 1.3 million people were due to a changing climate, the potential for further pushed from rural to urban areas during 2006- water-driven instability is significant. Responding 2010 as their crops and livelihoods dried up. These to this will require more than improved water sup- shifts contributed to social and economic disrup- plies.
    [Show full text]
  • Marten Stol WOMEN in the ANCIENT NEAR EAST
    Marten Stol WOMEN IN THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST Marten Stol Women in the Ancient Near East Marten Stol Women in the Ancient Near East Translated by Helen and Mervyn Richardson ISBN 978-1-61451-323-0 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-1-61451-263-9 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-1-5015-0021-3 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. Original edition: Vrouwen van Babylon. Prinsessen, priesteressen, prostituees in de bakermat van de cultuur. Uitgeverij Kok, Utrecht (2012). Translated by Helen and Mervyn Richardson © 2016 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin Cover Image: Marten Stol Typesetting: Dörlemann Satz GmbH & Co. KG, Lemförde Printing and binding: cpi books GmbH, Leck ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Table of Contents Introduction 1 Map 5 1 Her outward appearance 7 1.1 Phases of life 7 1.2 The girl 10 1.3 The virgin 13 1.4 Women’s clothing 17 1.5 Cosmetics and beauty 47 1.6 The language of women 56 1.7 Women’s names 58 2 Marriage 60 2.1 Preparations 62 2.2 Age for marrying 66 2.3 Regulations 67 2.4 The betrothal 72 2.5 The wedding 93 2.6
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Near East and North Africa Regional Overview of Food Security
    2 018 Near East and North Africa REGIONAL OVERVIEW OF FOOD SECURITY AND NUTRITION RURAL TRANSFORMATION-KEY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE NEAR EAST AND NORTH AFRICA COVER PHOTOGRAPH A Farmer cultivating crops. ©FAO/Franco Mattioli 2 018 REGIONAL OVERVIEW OF FOOD SECURITY AND NUTRITION RURAL TRANSFORMATION-KEY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE NEAR EAST AND NORTH AFRICA Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Cairo, 2019 RECOMMENDED CITATION: FAO. 2019. Rural transformation-key for sustainable development in the near east and North Africa. Overview of Food Security and Nutrition 2018. Cairo. 80 pp. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. ISBN 978-92-5-131348-0 © FAO, 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial -Share Alike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/ 3.0/igo/legalcode/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited.
    [Show full text]
  • The Levant and Europe: Shipping and Trade -- Networks of People and Knowledge
    H-SAE CfP: The Levant and Europe: Shipping and Trade -- Networks of People and Knowledge. 2nd International Conference of The Levantine Heritage Foundation Discussion published by Axel Corlu on Tuesday, October 20, 2015 Type: Call for Papers Date: November 2, 2016 to November 4, 2016 Location: United Kingdom Subject Fields: Architecture and Architectural History, Economic History / Studies, Immigration & Migration History / Studies, Maritime History / Studies, Middle East History / Studies Call for Papers The Levant and Europe: Shipping and Trade -- Networks of People and Knowledge The Levantine Heritage Foundation 2 – 4 November, 2016 Europe House and the Hellenic Centre, London In November 2016, the Levantine Heritage Foundation is organizing its second interdisciplinary conference, entitled “The Levant and Europe: Shipping and Trade – Networks of People and Knowledge,” in London, at Europe House and the Hellenic Centre. Building on the success of the groundbreaking first international conference on Levantines in Istanbul, 2014, this conference will emphasize the theme of trade as the central dynamic in the creation of a Levantine world, with complex economic networks giving rise to equally complex social, cultural, political, and material interactions and syntheses. Although the Levant has been part of Eurasian trade networks for millennia, it played an increasingly central role, and provided a formative geocultural space for exchanges, during the creation of the modern world: the economic expansion of capitalism, accompanied by imperialism, nationalism, and the movement of people through the Levant shaped the Middle East as we know it. The essential “engine of history” in most of these historical dynamics was trade, providing the material exchanges and networks, which in turn generated an array of social and cultural interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Effects of Potential Deep Trade Integration in the Levant
    Missed Opportunities: Economic Effects of Potential Deep Trade Integration in the Levant Elena Ianchovichina and Maros Ivanic. Abstract On the eve of the Arab Spring, economies in the Levant region were considering options for deep regional trade integration, but the spread of unrest that culminated into the Syrian civil war interrupted this process. Using new data for six Levant economies, including Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and Turkey, set within a database suitable for global general equilibrium analysis, the paper assesses the medium-term economic effects of potential deep trade reforms in the Levant. The results suggest that all Levant economies could have gained considerably had they continued strengthening their trade ties. In per capita terms, Iraq could have gained the most, followed by Syria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, and Turkey. Services liberalization would have led to greatest benefits, estimated to contribute between 70% and 95% of the overall estimated welfare gains from deeper trade integration. Other measures, including further liberalization of agricultural trade with Turkey, reduction in non-tariff barriers, and improved transport logistics, would have led to modest welfare gains. However, the effects on exports vary by country, sector, and reform instrument, and are estimated to be sizable for some sectors. These results are indicative of some of the opportunity costs of the political conflict in the Levant and should be factored into assessments of its long-term costs on the Levant economies. JEL classification: F13, F15 Keywords: Trade integration, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Turkey, Levant, Mashreq, Middle East, Syrian civil war, long-term costs We would like to thanks Sibel Kulaksiz and Jorge Araujo for comments on earlier versions of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • An Action Research Approach Prepared by Adrianne B. Everton
    1 Where in the World is the Middle East? An Action Research Approach Prepared by Adrianne B. Everton Time: One Week Level: Grades 6-12 Rationale: This is an Action Research on geography of the Middle East. This approach will allow teachers to know what is actually happening in the classrooms, what students are thinking, why students are reacting in the way they do, and what aspects of the classroom teachers should focus on to develop our teaching most effectively, how we should change in these aspects, and what the effects of such a change are. The Action Research encompasses four components: The Quantitative Analysis, The Qualitative Analysis, Cultural Connection as well as Technology. Quantitative Analysis: Gather individual student and group data based on their understanding of what is and what is not considered Middle East via Pre-test and Post-test. Qualitative Analysis: Gather individual and group data based on their interpretation of the dichotomy of how the region of Middle East is divided. Cultural Connection: Student creates a region using a self-chosen map of i.e., a city, state, home country, and rationalize its dichotomy. Materials: -Internet connection, overhead projector for using maps of the Middle East (see link below) -Class set of background information (handout #1) -Class set of Student Activity Worksheet #1 and #2 -Class set of Political Outline Map of the Middle East (see link below) -World map for each group or Map of the World in textbook Common Core State Standards: -CCSS.ELA-LITERACY RH.6-8.1 Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources.
    [Show full text]