DOCSLIB.ORG

House of Commons Official Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
House of Commons Official Report Tuesday Volume 637 6 March 2018 No. 105 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 6 March 2018 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2018 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 145 6 MARCH 2018 146 Helen Hayes: I have been raising concerns about the House of Commons closure of Lambeth county court for the past two years, and the court finally closed in December. My constituents facing the repossession of their homes must now attend Tuesday 6 March 2018 Clerkenwell county court, which lawyers report to be a chaotic environment, which is impossible to contact by The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock telephone, where cases and files frequently go missing and where the number of respondents failing to attend is rocketing. When will the Justice Secretary take action PRAYERS to address this unacceptable situation? Mr Gauke: The reality is that we are undertaking a [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] series of reforms, making much greater use of digital technology and increasing access to online ways of dealing with this. This is an important modernisation Oral Answers to Questions that the courts system needs. Mr Philip Hollobone (Kettering) (Con): Very sadly, we have lost our magistrates court in Kettering, which, I have to say to the Government, was a mistake. It means JUSTICE that magistrates, the police and witnesses are all having to travel further. The closure of court sends a poor signal to the magistracy that they are not valued. Can The Secretary of State was asked— we get rid of this ridiculous age limit, whereby magistrates Court Closures have to retire at the age of 70? 1. Ruth George (High Peak) (Lab): What recent Mr Gauke: I am grateful to my hon. Friend for assessment his Department has made of the effect of raising this point, on which I have received representations. court closures on access to justice. [904186] This is consistent with what happens elsewhere within the judiciary, but I am conscious that it will continue to 2. Helen Hayes (Dulwich and West Norwood) (Lab): be a matter of some debate. What recent assessment his Department has made of the effect of court closures on access to justice. [904188] Yasmin Qureshi (Bolton South East) (Lab): The Government are continuing to cut court staff, close The Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor courts and sign contracts worth millions of pounds for (Mr David Gauke): Maintaining access to justice is a their digitisation programme. These are huge changes, key principle when changes to the estate are proposed. which will have an impact on our courts for decades. Before issuing our consultation on court closures in Will the Minister promise not to close any more courts January, we assessed the impact on access to justice— or sign contracts until the courts Bill is published and principally, the changes in travel time for court users. the matter has been debated fully in this Chamber? The decision to close a court is never taken lightly, and is made only after full public consultation and where we Mr Gauke: I hope to be able to bring forward further are satisfied that access to justice is maintained. Our news on the courts Bill in the near future, but I am not reform programme will improve access to justice for going to give the undertaking the hon. Lady seeks. It is many users, while allowing many needs to be met without important that we continue to look to get the best out the need to attend court. Online solutions and video of the resources we have. If that means reforms here in hearings will make access to justice easier. making greater use of digital technology and ensuring that our court estate is as rational and efficient as Ruth George: The Minister’sexperience is not happening possible, we will need to continue to do that. in my constituency, where Buxton court closed in 2016. Some of my constituents now have to travel 40 miles on Vulnerable Witnesses a one-and-a-half-hour trip to Chesterfield court. The police say that it now takes them a whole day to take 3. Tony Lloyd (Rochdale) (Lab): What assessment his someone to court, whereas it used to take less than half Department has made of the time taken to bring to a day, and that is having an impact on the number of court criminal cases involving vulnerable witnesses. offenders they can bring to court and on justice in my [904189] area. Please will the Minister take this into account in the current consultation? The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Lucy Frazer): I understand that the hon. Gentleman Mr Gauke: I am grateful to the hon. Lady for her has a great interest in this area and did a lot of work comments, but we also have to take into account the when he was the police and crime commissioner of fact that 41% of courts and tribunals used less than half Greater Manchester, calling for a review of how victims their available hearing capacity during the financial and witnesses are treated in the criminal justice system. year 2016-17, and across the country courts are utilised It is right that cases come to court as quickly as possible, at 58% of their capacity. In those circumstances, where and timeliness in the criminal courts system is improving. resources are scarce we have to make decisions about The average mean number of days from listing to the reforms we undertake. completion is down from 33 in 2015 to 27 in the third 147 Oral Answers 6 MARCH 2018 Oral Answers 148 quarter of 2017. Unfortunately, as he will know, there made to relive harrowing experiences. Will the Minister are particular challenges in relation to sex offences, be responding directly to the Spicer review’s where it does take longer for cases to come to court. recommendations? Tony Lloyd: The Minister is absolutely right that Dr Lee: I thank the hon. Lady for her question. The there are complexities in cases of, for example, child Department is of course aware of that serious case sexual abuse or rape.Nevertheless,constant, even legitimate, review of the sexual exploitation of children. The details adjournments in cases can lead to months of delay. are shocking. Like all the agencies involved, we are Sometimes, it takes years before victims come to court. looking into ways to continuously improve our service. Victims who are already traumatised by what has happened I shall write to the hon. Lady about whether we will to them deserve better than to be traumatised by the respond directly to that review. process. Can we make them a priority? Patrick Grady (Glasgow North) (SNP): Is the Minister Lucy Frazer: The hon. Gentleman is absolutely right aware of new regulations that the Scottish Government that we need to be extremely careful with vulnerable are introducing to exempt domestic abuse victims,recipients witnesses and witnesses in sex cases and ensure that of crisis welfare support and those on low incomes from they get justice. We are bringing in and rolling out civil court fees? What discussions is he having with the measures on the taking of their evidence to ensure that Scottish Government about what lessons he might learn they can do that pre-trial and therefore safely, which from that process? will speed up justice. As the hon. Gentleman knows and as the Secretary of State has mentioned, we are hoping Dr Lee: We have plenty to learn from what is to introduce the courts Bill, which will ensure the happening in Scotland with regard to the way we deal streamlining of justice and do away with unnecessary with women who are victims of domestic abuse, and hearings. Hopefully, that will speed up access to justice. indeed offenders who have been victims of domestic abuse. As the Justice Minister with responsibility for the Jim Shannon (Strangford) (DUP): Will the Minister devolvedAdministrations,mydiscussionscontinueregularly. further outline what training lawyers receive in the I look forward to learning from Scotland in future. handling of vulnerable witnesses? Does the Department intend to make updates to such training compulsory? Sir Edward Davey (Kingston and Surbiton) (LD): The Government had plans to legislate to ban alleged Lucy Frazer: In the family court, all judges have domestic abusers from cross-examining their victims in training on dealing with vulnerable witnesses. I am sure the family courts. Is that still Government policy? If so, that the Crown Prosecution Service has training as well. when will such a provision be put before the House? Every day that there is a delay, more vulnerable people Victims and Witnesses: Court Experience get tormented in court. 4. Alan Mak (Havant) (Con): What steps his Department Dr Lee: The right hon. Gentleman is spot on in his is taking to improve the court experience for victims analysis. The abuse and coercion of females, invariably and witnesses. [904190] by males, through the court process is wrong and not acceptable. We will bring forward details on how we The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice intend to address that in the Bill that is coming later this (Dr Phillip Lee): We are committed to improving the year. experiences of those who have become victims of crime, which is why, by the summer, we will publish our victims Gloria De Piero (Ashfield) (Lab): The court experience strategy, a key aspect of which is how we can improve can be a bewildering one—it can often feel like a support for victims as they interact with the criminal different planet.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Vision for Social Housing
    Building for our future A vision for social housing The final report of Shelter’s commission on the future of social housing Building for our future: a vision for social housing 2 Building for our future: a vision for social housing Contents Contents The final report of Shelter’s commission on the future of social housing For more information on the research that 2 Foreword informs this report, 4 Our commissioners see: Shelter.org.uk/ socialhousing 6 Executive summary Chapter 1 The housing crisis Chapter 2 How have we got here? Some names have been 16 The Grenfell Tower fire: p22 p46 changed to protect the the background to the commission identity of individuals Chapter 1 22 The housing crisis Chapter 2 46 How have we got here? Chapter 3 56 The rise and decline of social housing Chapter 3 The rise and decline of social housing Chapter 4 The consequences of the decline p56 p70 Chapter 4 70 The consequences of the decline Chapter 5 86 Principles for the future of social housing Chapter 6 90 Reforming social renting Chapter 7 Chapter 5 Principles for the future of social housing Chapter 6 Reforming social renting 102 Reforming private renting p86 p90 Chapter 8 112 Building more social housing Recommendations 138 Recommendations Chapter 7 Reforming private renting Chapter 8 Building more social housing Recommendations p102 p112 p138 4 Building for our future: a vision for social housing 5 Building for our future: a vision for social housing Foreword Foreword Foreword Reverend Dr Mike Long, Chair of the commission In January 2018, the housing and homelessness charity For social housing to work as it should, a broad political Shelter brought together sixteen commissioners from consensus is needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Antisemitism in the Radical Left and the British Labour Party, by Dave Rich
    Kantor Center Position Papers Editor: Mikael Shainkman January 2018 ANTISEMITISM IN THE RADICAL LEFT AND THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY Dave Rich* Executive Summary Antisemitism has become a national political issue and a headline story in Britain for the first time in decades because of ongoing problems in the Labour Party. Labour used to enjoy widespread Jewish support but increasing left wing hostility towards Israel and Zionism, and a failure to understand and properly oppose contemporary antisemitism, has placed increasing distance between the party and the UK Jewish community. This has emerged under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn, a product of the radical 1960s New Left that sees Israel as an apartheid state created by colonialism, but it has been building on the fringes of the left for decades. Since Corbyn became party leader, numerous examples of antisemitic remarks made by Labour members, activists and elected officials have come to light. These remarks range from opposition to Israel’s existence or claims that Zionism collaborated with Nazism, to conspiracy theories about the Rothschilds or ISIS. The party has tried to tackle the problem of antisemitism through procedural means and generic declarations opposing antisemitism, but it appears incapable of addressing the political culture that produces this antisemitism: possibly because this radical political culture, borne of anti-war protests and allied to Islamist movements, is precisely where Jeremy Corbyn and his closest associates find their political home. A Crisis of Antisemitism Since early 2016, antisemitism has become a national political issue in Britain for the first time in decades. This hasn’t come about because of a surge in support for the far right, or jihadist terrorism against Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Realignment of British Jews: Testing Competing Explanations
    The University of Manchester Research Political realignment of British Jews: Testing competing explanations DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102063 Document Version Accepted author manuscript Link to publication record in Manchester Research Explorer Citation for published version (APA): Barclay, A., Sobolewska, M., & Ford, R. (2019). Political realignment of British Jews: Testing competing explanations. Electoral Studies, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102063 Published in: Electoral Studies Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on Manchester Research Explorer is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Proof version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Explorer are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Takedown policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please refer to the University of Manchester’s Takedown Procedures [http://man.ac.uk/04Y6Bo] or contact [email protected] providing relevant details, so we can investigate your claim. Download date:09. Oct. 2021 Political Realignment of British Jews: Testing Competing Explanations. Andrew Barclay School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester Prof. Maria Sobolewska School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester Prof. Robert Ford School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester Manuscript accepted for publication by Electoral Studies How to cite: Barclay, Andrew. Sobolewska, Maria. & Ford, Robert (2019) “Political Realignment of British Jews: Testing Competing Explanations” Electoral Studies, 61 1 Political realignment of British Jews: testing competing explanations.
    [Show full text]
  • Housebuilder & Developer
    Grenfell Tower: The Social Network: Housebuilding sector Industry reaction as Patrick Mooney says offers words of the investigation gets lessons must be encouragement to underway learned from Grenfell new Housing Minister Page 05 Page 20 Page 08 07.17 Housebuilder & Developer A NEW WAY OF LIVING Report predicts £70bn growth in Build to Rent by 2020, with renters benefitting from a much wider range of extra amenities (see Industry News) The sound good factor is here and you can For your customers, this means enjoying build it into every property with Isover every room to the full without the worry acoustic insulation. of noise disturbing anyone else. Use Isover in your next build and see for yourself how This means you can create homes that sound the sound good factor can enhance build as good as they look, while not just passing quality and increase sales. acoustic regulations but surpassing them. Find out about turning sound into sales at soundgoodfactor.co.uk 07.17 CONTENTS 19 25 COMMENT CASE STUDY A CULTURE OF COLLABORATION COULD KODA BE THE ANSWER? As the dust begins to settle after the General A sustainable factory-made modular home has Election, those working in construction have had been launched in partnership with the BRE, an almighty challenge working out just what a which is hoped to provide a new answer to the hung Parliament might mean. growing UK housing crisis. FEATURES: 29 45 AIR CONDITIONING & VENTILATION SOCIAL HOUSING ALSO IN FAST RECOVERY NEW AGE BATHROOMS Martin Passingham of Daikin UK explores how a Martin Walker of Methven UK considers the role THIS ISSUE: 960 mm parapet wall nearly ruined air played by technology and design in the creation conditioning plans for a listed five-storey house of usable bathrooms for the country’s ageing 04-15 in Hyde Park, London.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Journey of Recovery Needs Assessment
    A Journey of Recovery Supporting health & wellbeing for the communities impacted by the Grenfell Tower fire disaster This report This report The report considers the primary impacts on the health and wellbeing of those affected by the Grenfell disaster, and makes a number of recommendations to support the journey to recovery. In doing so, it has attempted to draw on a range of evidence and insights, to help those involved with recovery at any level in the work they are doing. It brings together evidence about: ñ The characteristics of the communities prior to the fire. ñ Evidence from the impact of other disasters both from the UK and internationally to learn from the experience of elsewhere. ñ Analysis of data on the impact of Grenfell one year one to try and understand both the nature and scale of the impact. ñ The voice of people in the community on what matters most to those who have been affected and what is important in recovery to them. Report authors and contributors Jason Strelitz, Chris Lawrence, Clare Lyons-Amos, Tammy Macey Acknowledgements We would like to thank all the residents and those working across North Kensington who have contributed to this report in many ways, and in particular to Natasha Elcock and Bilal Elguenuni from Grenfell United for sharing their insights and reflections. We would also like to thank many colleagues in Kensington and Chelsea Council, West London Clinical Commissioning Group and Central and North West London (CNWL) NHS Foundation Trust who have helped developed this report. Thank you also to Shane Ryan from Working with Men, for his support in reaching out to young people to inform this work, Rajaa Bouchab and Hamza Taouzzale who led the young people’s peer research project, and William Degraft Johnson and Tayshan Hayden Smith, who carried out the interviews for the boys and young men research.
    [Show full text]
  • Jamie Stern-Weiner Tis Ebook Edition Published by Verso 2019
    anti-semitism and the labour party Anti-Semitism and the Labour Party Edited by Jamie Stern-Weiner Tis ebook edition published by Verso 2019 All rights reserved Te moral rights of the authors have been asserted Verso UK: 6 Meard St, London, W1F 0EG US: 20 Jay St, Suite 1010, Brooklyn, NY 11201 versobooks.com Verso is the imprint of New Lef Books ISBN-13: 978-1-78960-671-3 ‘Corbyn Under Fire’ and ‘Te Never Ending Story’, © Daniel Finn 2018, frst appeared in Jacobin. ‘Jeremy Corbyn is an Anti-Racist, Not an Anti-Semite’ © Jospehn Finlay, 2019, frst appeared in Times of Israel. 'Smoke Without Fire: Te Myth of the 'Labour Antisemitism Crisis’ © Jamie Stern-Weiner and Alan Maddison, 2019. ‘Te Chimera of British Anti-Semitism (and How Not to Fight It if it Were Real)’, frst appeared on Verso Blog © Norman Finkelstein, 2019; ’60 Times Jeremy Corbyn Stood with Jewish People’ © @ToryFibs; ‘Briefng for Canvassers: Challenging false allegations of antisemitism’ and ‘Te Riverside Scandal’ with permission from Jewish Voice for Labour; ‘A Disinformation Campaign’ © Media Reform Coalition, 2019; ‘Te Fake News Nazi: Corbyn, Williamson and the Anti-Semitism Scandal’ from Medians © David Edwards, 2019; ‘Is the Guardian Institutionally Antisemitic?’ and ‘Labour Party Conference or Nuremberg Rally? Assessing the Evidence’ from author’s blog, © Jamie Stern-Weiner 2019; ‘Hue and Cry over the UCU’ © Richard Kuper 2019; with permission of OpenDemocracy; ‘Why the Labour Party Should Not Adopt the IHRA Defnition or Any Other Defnition of Antisemitism’ from author’s
    [Show full text]
  • Defence Committee Formal Minutes Session 2017–19
    House of Commons Defence Committee Formal Minutes Session 2017-19 TUESDAY 12 SEPTEMBER2017 Members present: Rt Hon Dr JulianLewis, in the Chair1 Leo Docherty Gavin Robinson Martin Docherty-Hughes Ruth Smeeth Rt Hon Mark Francois Rt Hon John Spellar Graham P Jones Phil Wilson 1. Declaration of interests Members declared their interests, in accordance with the Resolution of the House of 13 July 1992 ( see Appendix). 2. Committee working methods The Committee considered this matter. Ordered, That the public be admitted during the examination of witnesses unless the Committee orders otherwise. Resolved, That the Committee examine witnesses in public, except where it otherwise orders. Resolved, That witnesses who submit written evidence to the Committee are authorised to publish it on their own account in accordance with Standing Order No. 135, subject always to the discretion of the Chair or where the Committee orders otherwise. Resolved, That the Committee shall not consider individual cases. Ordered, That John Spellar take the Chair of the Committee, if present, in the absence ofthe Chair. 3. F-35 Procurement The Committee considered this matter. 4. Future programme The Committee considered this matter. 5. Oral evidence: F-35 Procurement Deborah Haynes, Defence Editor, The Times, Alexi Mostrous, Head of Investigations, The Times and Justin Bronk, Research Fellow, RUSI, gave oral evidence. In the absence of the Chair, Mr John Spellar was called to the chair. Justin Bronk, Research Fellow, RUSI, gave further oral evidence. [Adjourned until Wednesday 13 September at 2:30pm. 1Electedbythe House (Standing Order No. 122B ) 12 July 201 7, see Votes and Proceedings 12 July201 7 TUESDAY 7NOVEMBER2017 Members present: Rt Hon Dr Julian Lewis, in the Chair Rt Hon Mr Mark Francois Rt Hon John Spellar Ruth Smeeth Phil Wtl.son I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Corbyn Years
    The Corbyn years John Booth Left Out: The Inside Story of Labour Under Corbyn Gabriel Pogrund and Patrick Maguire London: The Bodley Head, 2020, £18.99 This Land: The Story of a Movement Owen Jones London: Allen Lane, 2020, £20.00 When back in 2015 newly elected Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn was first hit by critical abuse, Benjamin Netanyahu had just warned President Barack Obama of the power of the friends of Israel in Washington DC.1 Hundreds of members of the US Congress afforded Israel’s prime minister repeated standing ovations for assertively undermining their president’s Iran nuclear deal.2 Anyone with a weather eye to the West could forecast what was to descend on the peace-campaigning MP for Islington North. If the US President could be so vilified a mile from the White House, what chance had a life-long critic of US foreign policy – his children’s Chilean-born mother was a refugee from the Kissinger-backed Pinochet coup – who had landed the task of leading a party of diminished and largely demoralised members after two general election defeats?3 This perspective is not one embraced by the authors of these two books on Corbyn’s travails. It’s disappointing as Left Out joint author Gabriel Pogrund enjoyed a Laurence Stern journalism fellowship (now the Stern- 1 <https://tinyurl.com/nsvwssf> or <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/ wp/2015/03/03/full-text-netanyahus-address-to-congress/> 2 <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KMVhb57RqI&> 3 <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/election2010/results/> <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2015/results> <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2017/results> Bryan fellowship) at The Washington Post.4 In my experience of working at the Post in DC it’s hard not to be aware of the powerful influence of Israel’s supporters in US politics and journalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland (Executive Formation and Exercise of Functions) Bill
    1 House of Commons Wednesday 24 October 2018 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE HOUSE New Amendments handed in are marked thus Amendments which will comply with the required notice period at their next appearance Amendments tabled since the last publication: 23 and 24 NORTHERN IRELAND (EXECUTIVE FORMATION AND EXERCISE OF FUNCTIONS) BILL NOTE This document includes all amendments tabled to date and includes any withdrawn amendments at the end. The amendments have been arranged in the order in which they relate to the Bill. Nigel Mills 15 Clause 1,page1, line 16, at end insert— “(4A) If the period mentioned in section 16(A)(3) of the Northern Ireland Act 1998, as modified by subsection (1), ends without the Ministerial offices having been filled section 32 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 has effect as if for subsection (3) there were substituted— “(3) The Secretary of State shall within 7 calendar days of the end of the period mentioned in in section 16(A)(3) set a date for the poll for the election of the next Northern Ireland Assembly. The date set shall be no later than 3 calendar months after the end of the period mentioned in section 16(A)(3).” Member’s explanatory statement This amendment would require elections in Northern Ireland to be called if Ministerial offices are not filled by 26 March 2019. 2 Committee of the whole House: 24 October 2018 Northern Ireland (Executive Formation and Exercise of Functions) Bill, continued Dr Andrew Murrison 1 Clause 2,page2, line 20, leave out paragraph (b) Member’s explanatory statement This amendment would prevent the Secretary of State from extending the deadline for appointment of Northern Ireland Ministers without the approval of Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Corbyn Disciplinary Letter.Key
    ) [email protected] x +44 (0)330 822 0321 = www.antisemitism.uk Tom Watson MP Deputy Leader Labour Party By e-mail only 23rd September 2016 Dear Mr Watson, We are writing to you pursuant to Chapter 1, Clause IX (2) (B) of the Labour Party’s Rule Book to complain about the conduct of Jeremy Corbyn. We request that you present our disciplinary complaint to the Party’s National Executive Committee, for consideration by the Party’s National Constitutional Committee. We charge that Mr Corbyn has breached the Party’s Conditions of Membership as set out in Chapter 2, Clause I (8) of the Party’s Rule Book by committing acts that are grossly detrimental to the Party, namely characterising Jewish people as dissembling and dishonest in their reporting of antisemitism, and by using the influence and prestige of his office to disseminate and normalise that lie, contrary to Chapter I, Clause IV (2) (B) of the Party’s Constitutional Rules, as contained in the Party’s Rule Book. The allegation that Jews lie and deceive in order to further hidden agendas is an age-old antisemitic trope. It has now been manifestly deployed by Mr Corbyn in his leadership campaign video. It falls under the definition of antisemitism used by decent nations around the world — including our own — by “making mendacious...allegations about Jews”. The definition can be found on our website at www.antisemitism.uk/definition. Although Mr Corbyn and his allies have a long history of association with antisemites, it was not until 5th April this year that he crossed the line and made an antisemitic statement.
    [Show full text]
  • Antisemitism in the UK
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Antisemitism in the UK Tenth Report of Session 2016–17 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 13 October 2016 HC 136 Published on 16 October 2016 by authority of the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership James Berry MP (Conservative, Kingston and Surbiton) Mr David Burrowes MP (Conservative, Enfield, Southgate) Nusrat Ghani MP (Conservative, Wealden) Mr Ranil Jayawardena MP (Conservative, North East Hampshire) Tim Loughton MP (Conservative, East Worthing and Shoreham) (Interim Chair) Stuart C. McDonald MP (Scottish National Party, Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East) Naz Shah MP (Labour, Bradford West) Mr Chuka Umunna MP (Labour, Streatham) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) [Victoria Atkins has been appointed to a Government post and is taking no further part in Committee activities. She will be formally discharged from the Committee by a Motion of the House, and a replacement appointed, in due course] The following were also members of the Committee during the Parliament: Keir Starmer MP (Labour, Holborn and St Pancras) Anna Turley MP (Labour (Co-op), Redcar) Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk.
    [Show full text]