Office & Lab Space: Available for Lease in the Illinois
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
CAMPBELL PARK DR PAGE 1 of 1 3D TOUR: Real.Vision/2250-West-Campbell-Park-Drive-2 CHICAGO, IL 60612, USA
2250 W CAMPBELL SINGLE TENANT PARK OFFICE & LAB SPACE DRIVE BUILDING AVAILABLE PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS AVAILABLE 3,000 SF NOW LAB SPACE AMPLE PARKING EMERGENCY AVAILABLE LAB SHOWER (25 SPACES) 2250 W CAMPBELL PARK DR PAGE 1 OF 1 3D TOUR: real.vision/2250-west-campbell-park-drive-2 CHICAGO, IL 60612, USA OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE 11,900 SF 11'2" × 11'8" 14'8" × 11'8" 11'5" × 11'8" CONFERENCE ROOM 27'6" × 15'4" OFFICE SPECS: 12' × 21'4" OPEN OFFICE - 14 Offices 23'2" × 68'6" STAFF LOUNGE - Lab Space 28' × 15'1" OFFICE - Conference Room 12' × 14'9" - Kitchen COPY ROOM 15' × 11'4" PWD PWD - Workshop Area OFFICE 12' × 11'11" WORKSHOP FOYER 50'11" × 16'1" 19'1" × 16'1" UTILITY OFFICE 11'11" × 19'4" OFFICE OFFICE 11'11" × 11' 11'8" × 16'5" LABORATORY 39'9" × 73'7" OFFICE 11'7" × 10'9" OFFICE 11'8" × 9'8" OFFICE 11'4" × 10'2" PWD PWD OFFICE 8'2" × 12'2" OFFICE UTIL 11'4" × 20'4" 11582 sq ft Larry Cohn Broker @properties D: 312-401-8966 0 24 ft CAPTURED ON: 20 MAY 2019 [email protected] DIMENSIONS, AREAS, LAYOUTS AND DETAILS ARE APPROXIMATE real.vision AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY. http://www.atproperties.com/agents/LarryCohn jackson 2250 W van buren CAMPBELL CTA BLUE LINE CTA CTA BLUE LINE CTA WESTERN STATION IMD STATION PARK EISENHOWER EXPY DRIVE congress HARRISON Parking Available CTA BUS ROUTE 7 at 701 S Leavitt Rush University Medical Center John H. Stroger, Jr. BUS ROUTE 7 CTA Hospital of Cook County CTA PINK LINE POLK STATION POLK CTA BUS ROUTE 157 OGDEN laflin DAMEN OAKLEY PAULINA ASHLAND WESTERN University of Illinois MARSHFIELD Jesse Brown VA Hospital and Health Medical Center Sciences System CTA BUS ROUTE 12 taylor STREET CORRIDOR taylor CTA BUS ROUTE 9 CTA CTA BUS ROUTE 50 CTA WOOD WOLCOTT ROOSEVELT CTA BUS ROUTE 12 washburne 13th ALLISON OLSZTA SARAH WARE First Vice President Ware Realty Group, LLC +1 312 935 1428 +1 312 376 1448 x101 [email protected] [email protected] © 2020 CBRE, Inc. -
Multimodal Transportation Plan Existing Conditions Report
1 Multimodal Transportation Plan Existing Conditions Report DRAFT - February 2014 The Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP) is the region’s official comprehensive planning organization. Its GO TO 2040 planning campaign is helping the region’s seven counties and 284 communities to implement strategies that address transportation, housing, economic development, open space, the environment, and other quality-of-life issues. This project was supported through CMAP’s Local Technical Assistance (LTA) program, which is funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), and the Chicago Community Trust. The UIC Office of Sustainability and CMAP would like to thank these funders for their support for this project. See www.cmap.illinois.gov for more information. iii Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Regional Context 5 3. Previous Plans, Studies, and Reports 13 4. Community Outreach 23 5. Demographics 31 6. UIC’s Transportation Network 35 7. Commuting and Mobility Patterns 57 8. Land Use and Development 65 9. Looking Forward 75 iv UIC Multimodal Transportation Plan - Existing Conditions SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 1 Section 1 Introduction One of the GO TO 2040 plan’s central goals is to create livable communities. Livability is primarily created at the local level, through planning and development decisions made by communities, developers, and individuals. Purpose of the Existing Conditions Report The existing conditions report is a critical first step in any planning process – laying the groundwork from which recommendations will ultimately be made. To properly address the transportation needs and challenges for the campus, it is important to understand what is happening on the ground and what the ideal goals for transportation are. -
Transit at a Crossroads
Transit at a Crossroads President’s 2007 Budget Recommendations Chicago Transit Authority Transit at a Crossroads Chicago Transit Board Carole L. Brown, Chairman Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Susan A. Leonis, Vice Chairman Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Carole L. Brown Chairman Henry T. Chandler, Jr. Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Cynthia A. Panayotovich Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Charles E. Robinson Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Alejandro Silva Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Nicholas C. Zagotta Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Frank Kruesi, President www.transitchicago.com 1-888-YOUR CTA Transit at a Crossroads CTA Organization Chart . .1 CTA Mission and Values . .2 Letter from the President . .3 Introduction . .7 Accomplishments & Plans . .8 2006 Operating Budget Performance 2006 Operating Budget Schedule . .30 2006 Operating Budget Performance Summary . .31 President’s 2007 Proposed Operating Budget President’s 2007 Proposed Operating Budget Schedule . .38 2007 Major Budget Assumptions . .39 President’s 2007 Proposed Operating Budget Summary . .40 President’s 2007 Proposed Operating Budget Schedules Department Budget Schedule . .48 Department By Line Item Schedule . .49 Department Budgeted positions . .50 President’s 2008 – 2009 Proposed Operating Financial Plan President’s 2008 – 2009 Proposed Operating Financial Plan Summary . .51 President’s 2008 – 2009 Proposed Operating Financial Plan Schedule . .61 Business Units Business Unit - Overview . .62 Business Unit - Activities by Unit . .63 President’s 2007 – 2011 Capital Improvement Plan & Program Introduction . .73 Sources of Funds . .77 Uses of Funds . .80 Detailed Capital Improvement Project Descriptions . .90 Appendices . .96 Chicago Transit Authority Organization Chart 1 Chicago Transit Authority Our Mission We deliver quality, affordable transit services that link people, jobs and communities. -
Chicago Transit Authority Circle Line Alternatives Analysis Study
Chicago Transit Authority Circle Line Alternatives Analysis Study Screen 2 Public Involvement Responses to Public Comments and Questions 24 February 2007 Written questions and comments regarding the Circle Line Alternatives Analysis Study were submitted by a variety of individuals and groups from throughout the Chicago region at the study’s Screen 2 Public Meetings held on September 26, 27 and 28, 2006. In addition, public comments and questions on Screen 2 were submitted directly to the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) via e-mail and postal mail through October 27, 2006. All of the questions and comments have been collected and compiled to provide a comprehensive review of the issues raised along with CTA’s responses. Every question, comment, and suggestion, submitted during the public comment period has been compiled in the “Outreach Comment Database” (see separate document). Each question has been recorded verbatim and assigned a number that corresponds with the answers provided in this document, ensuring every question or comment submitted has been reviewed and answered or acknowledged. Collectively, the public comments and preferences will be considered in the evaluation of alternatives and concepts introduced through the public involvement process and may be evaluated and/or reflected in advancing alternatives as appropriate. Many of the comments received were very similar in nature. As a result, similar comments and their responses have been grouped by topic and “General Comment” heading below to avoid duplicative responses. Questions or comments requiring individual or specific responses are also included below along with unique responses. In order to understand some terms used in the Comments and Responses, it may be necessary to review the original Screen 1 and Screen 2 presentation materials (including Screen 1 Comments and Responses), which are posted on CTA’s Web site www.transitchicago.com. -
Annual Ridership Report Calendar Year 2017
Annual Ridership Report Calendar Year 2017 Prepared by: Chicago Transit Authority Ridership Analysis and Reporting 1/31/2018 Table of Contents How to Read this Report ........................................................................................ i Annual Notes ......................................................................................................... ii Average Daily Ridership Methodology ................................................................. iii Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………………………...iv Annual Summary ........................................................................................................................1 Bus Ridership by Route ........................................................................................ 2 Rail Ridership by Entrance ................................................................................... 9 How to Read This Report Introduction This report shows how many customers used the CTA bus and rail systems for the year. Ridership statistics are given on a system-wide and route/station-level basis. Ridership is primarily counted as boardings, that is, customers boarding a transit vehicle (bus or rail). On the rail system, there is a distinction between station entries and total rides, or boardings. The official totals on the Annual Summary report show the total number of boardings made to CTA vehicles. How are customers counted? Rail On the rail system, a customer is counted as an entry each time he or she passes through a turnstile to enter a station. -
2014 Report 5 201 & Technology
201 4 Report REGIONAL RIDERSHIP September 2015 Prepared by Department of Finance, Innovation, & Technology 2014 Regional Ridership Report CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Ridership Results ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Market Analysis ......................................................................................................................................... 4 REGIONAL ECONOMY ................................................................................................................................... 6 REGIONAL RIDERSHIP .................................................................................................................................... 9 RTA System ............................................................................................................................................... 9 CTA RIDERSHIP RESULTS ............................................................................................................................. 10 CTA Bus ................................................................................................................................................... 10 CTA Rail .................................................................................................................................................. -
Noise Assessment of the Chicago Transit Authority Rapid Rail
. HL 18.5 .A3 7 no Port no UMTA-MA-06-0025-79-8 D 0 T - TSC- T A “ NOISE ASSESSMENT ui,: i n OF THE CHICAGO TRANSIT 78-52 AUTHORITY RAIL RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM Marshall L. Silver Robert C. Bachus Roland Priemer University of Illinois at Chicago Circle Box 4348 Chicago IL 60680 JANUARY 1979 FINAL REPORT DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC THROUGH THE NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE, SPRINGFIELD VIRGINIA 22161 prepared for U.S, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION Research and Education Division Washington DC 20590 . NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern- ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse pro- ducts or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are con- sidered essential to the object of this report. Technical Report Documentation Page 1 . Report No. 2 Go vernment Acc#»»ion No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. UMTA-MA-06-0025-79-8 4. Title and Subtitls 5. Report Data Noise Assessment of the Chicago Transit Authority January 1979 Rail Rapid Transit System 6. Performing Orgonizotion Code 8. Performing Organization Report No. 7. Authors) Silver, M.L., Bachus, R.C., and Priemer, R. DOT-TSC-UMTA-78- 52 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) University of Illinois at Chicagp-€4re4^^”'^ R9743/1 1MQ4Q 11. Controct or Grant No. Box 4348 l DEPARTMENT OF Chicago, Illinois - 60680 | TRANSPORTATION U.S- DOT- I I 0 007 13. -
Circle Line Screen 3 Responses to Public
Chicago Transit Authority Circle Line Alternatives Analysis Study Screen 3 Public Involvement Responses to Public Comments and Questions Written questions and comments regarding the Circle Line Alternatives Analysis Study were submitted by individuals and groups from throughout the Chicago region at the study’s Screen 3 Public Meetings held on September 29, 30 and October 1, 2009. In addition, public comments and questions on Screen 3 were submitted directly to the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) via e-mail through October 30, 2009. All of the questions and comments have been collected and compiled to provide a comprehensive review of the issues raised along with CTA’s responses. Every question, comment, and suggestion, submitted during the public comment period has been compiled in the “Outreach Comment Database” (see separate document). Each question has been recorded verbatim and assigned a number that corresponds with the answers provided in this document, ensuring every question or comment submitted has been reviewed and answered or acknowledged. Collectively, the public comments and preferences will be considered in the evaluation of alternatives and concepts introduced through the public involvement process and may be evaluated and/or reflected in advancing alternatives as appropriate. Many of the comments received were very similar in nature. As a result, similar comments and their responses have been grouped by topic and “General Comment” heading below to avoid duplicative responses. In order to understand some terms used in the Comments and Responses, it may be necessary to review the original Screen 1 and Screen 2 presentation materials (including Screen 1 Comments and Responses), which are posted on CTA’s Web site at www.transitchicago.com. -
Annual Ridership Report Calendar Year 2016
Annual Ridership Report Calendar Year 2016 Prepared by: Chicago Transit Authority Ridership Analysis and Reporting 2/1/2017 Table of Contents How to Read this Report ........................................................................................ i Annual Notes ......................................................................................................... ii Average Daily Ridership Methodology ................................................................. iii Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………………………...iv Annual Summary ........................................................................................................................1 Bus Ridership by Route ........................................................................................ 2 Rail Ridership by Entrance ................................................................................... 9 How to Read This Report Introduction This report shows how many customers used the CTA bus and rail systems for the year. Ridership statistics are given on a system-wide and route/station-level basis. Ridership is primarily counted as boardings, that is, customers boarding a transit vehicle (bus or rail). On the rail system, there is a distinction between station entries and total rides, or boardings. The official totals on the Annual Summary report show the total number of boardings made to CTA vehicles. How are customers counted? Rail On the rail system, a customer is counted as an entry each time he or she passes through a turnstile to enter a station.