DOCSLIB.ORG

THE Reconstruction ERA and the FRAGILITY of Democracy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE Reconstruction ERA and the FRAGILITY of Democracy Facing History and Ourselves is an international educational and professional development organization whose mission is to engage students of diverse backgrounds in an examination of racism, prejudice, and antisemitism in order to promote the development of a more humane and informed citizenry. By studying the historical development of the Holocaust and other examples of genocide, students make the essential connection between history and the moral choices they confront in their own lives. For more information about Facing History and Ourselves, please visit our website at www.facinghistory.org. Copyright © 2015 by Facing History and Ourselves National Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved. Facing History and Ourselves® is a trademark registered in the US Patent & Trademark Office. The photograph used in the background of our front cover depicts the African American and Radical Republican members of the South Carolina legislature in the 1870s. South Carolina had the first state legislature with a black majority. This photo was created by opponents of Radical Reconstruction, and intended to scare the white population. See Lesson 8, “Interracial Democracy” for suggestions about how to use this image in the classroom. Photo credit: Library of Congress (1876). ISBN: 978-1-940457-10-9 Acknowledgments Primary writer: Daniel Sigward This publication was made possible by the support of the Richard and Susan Smith Family Foundation. Developing this guide was a collaborative effort that required the input and expertise of a variety of people. Many Facing History and Ourselves staff members made invaluable contributions. The guidance of Adam Strom was essential from start to finish. Jeremy Nesoff played a critical role through his partnership with Dan Sigward and, along with Denny Conklin and Jocelyn Stanton, helped to shape the curriculum by providing feedback on numerous drafts. Margot Stern Strom, Marc Skvirsky, and Marty Sleeper served as a thoughtful editorial team. Anika Bachhuber, Brooke Harvey, and Samantha Landry kept the writing and production process moving forward. Catherine O’Keefe and Ariel Perry attended to countless details and transformed the manuscript into this beautiful and polished publication. Erin Kernen carefully managed to secure all license contracts. Rob Tokanel, Alexia Prichard, Wilkie Cook, and Liz Kelleher creatively adapted and extended this resource as they developed the companion videos and website. We also benefited greatly from the experience and advice of the ninth-grade history teachers in the Boston Public Schools—under the leadership of Robert Chisholm and James Liou—who piloted two versions of this curriculum in successive years. Additional feedback from Facing History staff members and teachers who conducted pilots in Cleveland, Memphis, Denver, and San Francisco helped us fine-tune the curriculum before final publication. Finally, we are grateful to have received guidance and feedback from distinguished historians and experts in history education. We owe special thanks to Eric Foner, Chad Williams, Steven Cohen, Chandra Manning, and Heather Cox Richardson. AcknowledGments iii Table of Contents Acknowledgments ........................................................... iii Introduction: The Fragility of Democracy ....................................vii Teaching This Unit.......................................................... viii Addressing Dehumanizing Language from History ......................... xiv Section 1 • The Individual and Society . 1 LESSON 1 The Power of Names ............................................... 2 Introducing the Writing Prompts ............................................ 15 Section 2 • We and They . 19 LESSON 2 Differences That Matter .......................................... 20 LESSON 3 Defining Freedom ................................................ 35 CLOSE READING A: Letter from Jourdon Anderson: A Freedman Writes His Former Master . 49 Connecting to the Writing Prompt ........................................... 57 Section 3 • Healing and Justice After War . 59 LESSON 4 The Devastation of War ........................................... 60 CLOSE READING B: Speech by President Lincoln: Second Inaugural Address . 72 LESSON 5 Healing and Justice .............................................. 84 LESSON 6 The Union as It Was .............................................. 97 Connecting to the Writing Prompt .......................................... 110 Section 4 • Radical Reconstruction and Interracial Democracy . 111 LESSON 7 Radical Reconstruction and the Birth of Civil Rights ................ 112 LESSON 8 Interracial Democracy ........................................... 125 LESSON 9 Equality for All? ................................................ 140 CLOSE READING C: Speech by Susan B. Anthony: Is It a Crime for Women to Vote? . 154 Connecting to the Writing Prompt .......................................... 166 Section 5 • Backlash and the Fragility of Democracy . .167 LESSON 10 Backlash and the Ku Klux Klan .................................. 168 LESSON 11 Shifting Public Opinion ........................................ 185 LESSON 12 Reflections of Race in Nineteenth-Century Media ................. 197 Connecting to the Writing Prompt .......................................... 207 LESSON 13 Violence, Race, and “Redemption” ............................... 208 CLOSE READING D: Speech by Senator Charles Hays Reaffirming the Rights of African Americans . 243 LESSON 14 The Coming of Segregation ..................................... 255 Connecting to the Writing Prompt .......................................... 262 TABLE OF CONTENTS v Section 6 • Memory and Legacy . 263 LESSON 15 The Power of Myth and the Purpose of History ................... 264 CLOSE READING E: Excerpt from “The Propaganda of History” by W. E. B. Du Bois . 274 LESSON 16 The Unfinished Revolution ..................................... 286 Connecting to the Writing Prompt .......................................... 297 Appendix . 299 Fostering a Reflective Classroom ............................................ 300 Journals in a Facing History Classroom ...................................... 302 vi Table of Contents INTRODUCTION The Fragility of Democracy by Marty Sleeper, Associate Executive Director, Facing History and Ourselves In Facing History and Ourselves classrooms, students learn that democracy, among the most fragile of human enterprises, is always a work in progress and can only remain vital through the active, thoughtful, and responsible participation of its citizens. Its ideals of freedom, equality, and justice require constant vigilance and sustenance. Those moments in history when these ideals were assaulted and democracy was put at risk, if not destroyed, need close and rigorous examination in the school curriculum. This unit provides teachers and students with opportunities to look closely at one such moment in American history: the era of Reconstruction after the Civil War. The core Facing History resource, Facing History and Ourselves: Holocaust and Human Behavior, explores the failure of democracy in Germany in the 1920s and 1930s, when such institutions as law, education, and civil legislation collapsed in the face of deep-seated prejudice, hatred, and violence. While Facing History rejects simple comparisons in history, the parallels between the Weimar Republic in Germany and the Reconstruction era in America are striking in their illumination of the fragility of democracy as both a means of governance and a set of societal ideals. The question of how a society heals and rebuilds after extraordinary division and trauma, when the ideals and values of democracy may be most vulnerable, can be explored in histories addressed by other Facing History resources as well, such as the history of South Africa after apartheid, the struggles in Cambodia, Bosnia, or Rwanda after genocides, and the writing of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights after World War II. But this unit on Reconstruction in America reveals how memory and history are themselves vulnerable and can be used by leaders in later generations to unleash racial hatred, justify discrimination, and deny liberty and equality to racial or religious minorities. New scholarship and perspectives on the past must constantly be brought to bear on how we understand the present. Examining the era of Reconstruction is a prime example. Few would deny that this history has been poorly and insufficiently taught. Its dilemmas deserve the close and rigorous attention that this unit offers. Moreover, themes of identity, membership, individual and group choice, responsibility, and denial—all components of human behavior that Facing History uses as a conceptual framework and vocabulary to help students enter into the past—permeate the era of Reconstruction, and their elaboration in this unit will assist students in understanding Reconstruction’s legacy today. Exploring this history in all its complexity offers young people a critical opportunity to exercise their capacity for emotional growth and ethical judgment as they connect its lessons to the issues and the choices faced in their own world and the world of the future. INTRODUCTION vii Teaching This Unit This curriculum is designed to guide you and your students through a Facing History and Ourselves unit about the Reconstruction era of American history. In this unit, students will investigate the challenges of creating a just democracy in a time of deep division. The resources included
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Social Studies Mini-Unit the Reconstruction Era
    Social Studies Mini-Unit The Reconstruction Era Goal: These lessons focus on both national and local personal narratives from the Reconstruction Period. Let these stories help you decide what characteristics a community, a leader or an individual would need during this time period. Materials: Computer with internet, writing materials Instruction: Following the Civil War, the Reconstruction Period began within our country an immense new chapter for social reform with the definition of freedom for debate. People began to rebuild the South and try to unite the states, but newly freed persons were seeking ways to build their own futures in a still hostile environment. Dive into these lessons to learn more about individuals of the time. Lesson 1: Lincoln Originals This online exhibition features digital scans of primary historical documents in Abraham Lincoln’s hand, or signed by him, drawn from the diverse manuscript holdings at Cincinnati Museum Center. 1. Explore the Lincoln Originals Online Exhibit 2. Read the Emancipation Proclamation Fact Sheet [linked here] a. Extension: Review the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments which are considered the Reconstruction Amendments. 3. Journal Entry: What characteristics defined President Lincoln? a. Write a persuasive argument in the form of a letter addressed to a past president (or the current administration) outlining an important issue and what you believe the correct course of action is and why. Cite evidence to support your case. 4. Extension Option: Research Lincoln’s Ten-Percent Plan, a plan for reconstruction, versus the Wade-Davis Bill, which was a Radical Republican plan for reconstruction. Explore the similarities and differences of these two documents.
    [Show full text]
  • H.Doc. 108-224 Black Americans in Congress 1870-2007
    “The Negroes’ Temporary Farewell” JIM CROW AND THE EXCLUSION OF AFRICAN AMERICANS FROM CONGRESS, 1887–1929 On December 5, 1887, for the first time in almost two decades, Congress convened without an African-American Member. “All the men who stood up in awkward squads to be sworn in on Monday had white faces,” noted a correspondent for the Philadelphia Record of the Members who took the oath of office on the House Floor. “The negro is not only out of Congress, he is practically out of politics.”1 Though three black men served in the next Congress (51st, 1889–1891), the number of African Americans serving on Capitol Hill diminished significantly as the congressional focus on racial equality faded. Only five African Americans were elected to the House in the next decade: Henry Cheatham and George White of North Carolina, Thomas Miller and George Murray of South Carolina, and John M. Langston of Virginia. But despite their isolation, these men sought to represent the interests of all African Americans. Like their predecessors, they confronted violent and contested elections, difficulty procuring desirable committee assignments, and an inability to pass their legislative initiatives. Moreover, these black Members faced further impediments in the form of legalized segregation and disfranchisement, general disinterest in progressive racial legislation, and the increasing power of southern conservatives in Congress. John M. Langston took his seat in Congress after contesting the election results in his district. One of the first African Americans in the nation elected to public office, he was clerk of the Brownhelm (Ohio) Townshipn i 1855.
    [Show full text]
  • Elias Hill and The
    RAC0010.1177/0306396815608357Race & ClassKelly 608357research-article2015 SAGE Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC Jubilee and the limits of African American freedom after Emancipation BRIAN KELLY Abstract: Scholarship generated in the post-civil rights US underpins a growing consensus that any honest confrontation with the American past requires an acknowledgment both of the nation’s foundations in racially-based slave labour and of the critical role that the enslaved played in ending that system. But scholars equally need to examine why the end of slavery did not deliver freedom, but instead – after a short-lived ‘jubilee’ during which freedpeople savoured their ‘brief moment in the sun’ – opened up a period of extreme repression and violence. This article traces the political trajectory of one prominent ex-slave and Republican party organiser, Elias Hill, to assess the constraints in which black grassroots activists operated. Though mainly concerned with the dashed hopes of African Americans, their experience of a steep reversal is in many ways the shared and profoundly significant legacy of ex-slaves across the former plantation societies of the Atlantic world. Brian Kelly, reader in US history at Queen’s University Belfast, has published widely on the prob- lem of racial antagonism and its impact on working-class politics in the US. His first book, Race, Class and Power in the Alabama Coalfields, 1908–1921 (Illinois, 2001), won the Isaac and Tamara Deutscher Memorial Prize. Former director of the After Slavery Project, he is co-editor with Bruce Baker of After Slavery: race, labor and citizenship in the Reconstruction South (Florida, 2013), and is completing an extended monograph on grassroots black political mobilisation in Reconstruction South Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 587 by Matheny a RESOLUTION to Honor Frederick Douglass for His Legacy of Advancing and Protecting Civi
    HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 587 By Matheny A RESOLUTION to honor Frederick Douglass for his legacy of advancing and protecting civil rights. WHEREAS, Frederick Douglass was born Frederick Augustus Washington Bailey near Easton, Maryland, in February of 1818, and lived the first twenty years of his life as a slave before escaping to freedom in 1838 through the Underground Railroad; and; WHEREAS, with the assistance of abolitionists, he resettled in New Bedford, Massachusetts and changed his name to avoid recapture by fugitive slave bounty hunters; he thus began a new life as Frederick Douglass and worked tirelessly to help other slaves flee north through the Underground Railroad; and WHEREAS, Frederick Douglass, who had no formal education and taught himself to read and write, would go on to become one of the Nation’s leading abolitionists; his seminal autobiographical work, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, explained with unsurpassed eloquence and detail how slavery corrupts the human spirit and robs both master and slave of their freedom; and WHEREAS, Frederick Douglass was not only prominent as an uncompromising abolitionist, but he also defended women’s rights; and WHEREAS, Frederick Douglass, through his writings, lectures, speeches, activism, and relationship with President Abraham Lincoln helped the Nation summon the will to accept civil war as the price to abolish slavery and emancipate millions from bondage; and WHEREAS, Frederick Douglass was a strong advocate for African American service in the Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction What Went Wrong?
    M16_UNGE0784_04_SE_C16.qxd 1/25/10 11:39 AM Page 355 16 Reconstruction What Went Wrong? 1863 Lincoln announces his Ten-Percent Plan for reconstruction 1863–65 Arkansas and Louisiana accept Lincoln’s conditions, but Congress does not readmit them to the Union 1864 Lincoln vetoes Congress’s Wade–Davis Reconstruction Bill 1865 Johnson succeeds Lincoln; The Freedmen’s Bureau overrides Johnson’s veto of the Civil Rights Act; Johnson announces his Reconstruction plan; All-white southern legislatures begin to pass Black Codes; The Thirteenth Amendment 1866 Congress adopts the Fourteenth Amendment, but it is not ratified until 1868; The Ku Klux Klan is formed; Tennessee is readmitted to the Union 1867 Congress passes the first of four Reconstruction Acts; Tenure of Office Act; Johnson suspends Secretary of War Edwin Stanton 1868 Johnson is impeached by the House and acquitted in the Senate; Arkansas, North Carolina, South Carolina, Alabama, Florida, and Louisiana are readmitted to the Union; Ulysses S. Grant elected president 1869 Woman suffrage associations are organized in response to women’s disappointment with the Fourteenth Amendment 1870 Virginia, Mississippi, Texas, and Georgia are readmitted to the Union 1870, 1871 Congress passes Force Bills 1875 Blacks are guaranteed access to public places by Congress; Mississippi redeemers successfully oust black and white Republican officeholders 1876 Presidential election between Rutherford B. Hayes and Samuel J. Tilden 1877 Compromise of 1877: Hayes is chosen as president, and all remaining federal troops are withdrawn from the South By 1880 The share-crop system of agriculture is well established in the South 355 M16_UNGE0784_04_SE_C16.qxd 1/25/10 11:39 AM Page 356 356 Chapter 16 • Reconstruction n the past almost no one had anything good to say about Reconstruction, the process by which the South was restored to the Union and the nation returned to peacetime pursuits and Irelations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reconstruction Era And
    Facing History and Ourselves is an international educational and professional development organization whose mission is to engage students of diverse backgrounds in an examination of racism, prejudice, and antisemitism in order to promote the development of a more humane and informed citizenry. By studying the historical development of the Holocaust and other examples of genocide, students make the essential connection between history and the moral choices they confront in their own lives. For more information about Facing History and Ourselves, please visit our website at www.facinghistory.org. Copyright © 2015 by Facing History and Ourselves National Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved. Facing History and Ourselves® is a trademark registered in the US Patent & Trademark Office. The photograph used in the background of our front cover depicts the African American and Radical Republican members of the South Carolina legislature in the 1870s. South Carolina had the first state legislature with a black majority. This photo was created by opponents of Radical Reconstruction, and intended to scare the white population. See Lesson 8, “Interracial Democracy” for suggestions about how to use this image in the classroom. Photo credit: Library of Congress (1876). ISBN: 978-1-940457-10-9 Acknowledgments Primary writer: Daniel Sigward This publication was made possible by the support of the Richard and Susan Smith Family Foundation. Developing this guide was a collaborative effort that required the input and expertise of a variety of people. Many Facing History and Ourselves staff members made invaluable contributions. The guidance of Adam Strom was essential from start to finish. Jeremy Nesoff played a critical role through his partnership with Dan Sigward and, along with Denny Conklin and Jocelyn Stanton, helped to shape the curriculum by providing feedback on numerous drafts.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction & the Legacy of the Civil War Bibliography Stephen V
    Reconstruction & the Legacy of the Civil War Bibliography Stephen V. Ash, A Massacre in Memphis: The Race Riot that Shook the Nation One Year After the Civil War (Hill & Wang, 2013) Edward Ayers, The Promise of the New South (Oxford University Press, 2007) Edward Ayers, America’s War: Talking About the Civil War and Emancipation on Their 150th Anniversaries. (American Library Association, 2011). Ira Berlin, The Long Emancipation: The Demise of Slavery in the United States. (Harvard University Press, 2015) David Blight, Race and Reunion: The Civil War in American Memory (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001) David Blight, Beyond the Battlefield: Race, Memory, and the American Civil War (University of Massachusetts Press, 2002). James Broomall and William Link, eds. Rethinking American Emancipation: Legacies of Slavery and the Quest for Black Freedom (Cambridge University Press, 2015) Thomas Brown, Civil War Canon: Sites of Confederate Memory in South Carolina (University of North Carolina Press, 2015) Thomas Brown, ed. Remixing the Civil War: Meditations on the Sesquicentennial. (Johns Hopkins Press, 2011) Fitzhugh Brundage, The Southern Past: A Clash of Race and Memory. (Belknap Press, 2008) Fitzhugh Brundage, Lynching in the New South: Georgia and Virginia, 1880-1930. (University of Illinois Press, 1993) Victoria Bynum, The Long Shadow of the Civil War: Southern Dissent and Its Legacies. (UNC Press, 2013) Jane Turner Censer, The Reconstruction of White Southern Womanhood, 1865-1895. (LSU Press, 2003) Paul Cimbala, Under the Guardianship of the Nation: The Freedmen’s Bureau and the Reconstruction of Georgia, 1865-1870. (UGA, 2003) Paul Cimbala, Veterans North and South: The Transition from Soldier to Civilian After the American Civil War (Praeger, 2015) Paul Cimbala and Randall Miller, eds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Freedmen'sbureau's Judicial
    Louisiana Law Review Volume 79 Number 1 The Fourteenth Amendment: 150 Years Later Article 6 A Symposium of the Louisiana Law Review Fall 2018 1-24-2019 “To This Tribunal the Freedman Has Turned”: The Freedmen’sBureau’s Judicial Powers and the Origins of the FourteenthAmendment Hon. Bernice B. Donald Pablo J. Davis Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev Part of the Law Commons Repository Citation Hon. Bernice B. Donald and Pablo J. Davis, “To This Tribunal the Freedman Has Turned”: The Freedmen’sBureau’s Judicial Powers and the Origins of the FourteenthAmendment, 79 La. L. Rev. (2019) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol79/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “To This Tribunal the Freedman Has Turned”: The Freedmen’s Bureau’s Judicial Powers and the Origins of the Fourteenth Amendment Hon. Bernice B. Donald* and Pablo J. Davis** TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................................................... 2 I. Wartime Genesis of the Bureau ....................................................... 5 A. Forerunners ................................................................................ 6 B. Creation of the Bureau ............................................................... 9 II. The Bureau’s Original Judicial Powers .......................................... 13 A. Judicial Powers Under the First Freedmen’s Bureau Act ............................................................................... 13 B. Cession and Reassertion of Jurisdiction .................................. 18 III. The Battle Over the Second Freedmen’s Bureau Act .................... 20 A. Challenges to the Bureau’s Judicial Powers ............................ 20 B.
    [Show full text]
  • H.Doc. 108-224 Black Americans in Congress 1870-2007
    FORMER MEMBERS H 1870–1887 ������������������������������������������������������������������������ Robert Smalls 1839 –1915 UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE H 1875–1879; 1882–1883; 1884–1887 REPUBLICAN FROM SOUTH CAROLINA n escaped slave and a Civil War hero, Robert Smalls publication of his name and former enslaved status in A served five terms in the U.S. House, representing northern propaganda proved demoralizing for the South.7 a South Carolina district described as a “black paradise” Smalls spent the remainder of the war balancing his role because of its abundant political opportunities for as a spokesperson for African Americans with his service freedmen.1 Overcoming the state Democratic Party’s in the Union Armed Forces. Piloting both the Planter, repeated attempts to remove that “blemish” from its goal which was re-outfitted as a troop transport, and later the of white supremacy, Smalls endured violent elections and a ironclad Keokuk, Smalls used his intimate knowledge of the short jail term to achieve internal improvements for coastal South Carolina Sea Islands to advance the Union military South Carolina and to fight for his black constituents in the campaign in nearly 17 engagements.8 face of growing disfranchisement. “My race needs no special Smalls’s public career began during the war. He joined defense, for the past history of them in this country proves free black delegates to the 1864 Republican National them to be equal of any people anywhere,” Smalls asserted. Convention, the first of seven total conventions he “All they need is an equal chance in the battle of life.”2 attended as a delegate.9 While awaiting repairs to the Robert Smalls was born a slave on April 5, 1839, in Planter, Smalls was removed from an all-white streetcar Beaufort, South Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Horses: the Army’S Achilles’ Heel in the Civil War Plains Campaigns of 1864- 1865
    Horses: The Army’s Achilles’ Heel in the Civil War Plains Campaigns of 1864- 1865 (Article begins on page 2 below.) This article is copyrighted by History Nebraska (formerly the Nebraska State Historical Society). You may download it for your personal use. For permission to re-use materials, or for photo ordering information, see: https://history.nebraska.gov/publications/re-use-nshs-materials Learn more about Nebraska History (and search articles) here: https://history.nebraska.gov/publications/nebraska-history-magazine History Nebraska members receive four issues of Nebraska History annually: https://history.nebraska.gov/get-involved/membership Full Citation: James E Potter, “Horses: The Army’s Achilles’ Heel in the Civil War Plains Campaigns of 1864- 1865, Nebraska History 92 (2011): 158-169 Article Summary: Civil War armies relied heavily on horses. Armies in the field equipped with artillery, cavalry, and supply trains required one horse or mule, on average, for every two men. Horses fit for service became scarce by the war’s final years. Far from the major eastern battlefields, regiments such as the First Nebraska Volunteer Cavalry felt the brunt of the equine shortage. Cataloging Information: Names: Henry Sibley, Alfred Sully, Robert B Mitchell, Robert Livingston, Patrick Connor, Grenville Dodge, August Scherneckau, John Pope, Henry Halleck Place Names: Fort Kearny and Fort Cottonwood, Nebraska; Fort Leavenworth, Kansas; Julesburg, Colorado; Fort Laramie, Wyoming; St. Louis, Missouri Keywords: Grenville Dodge, John Pope, First Nebraska Volunteer Cavalry, supply lines, Confederacy, Union, Powder River Expedition Photographs / Images: Custer’s supply train, Black Hills Expedition, 1874; Pvt. Luther North, Second Nebraska Volunteer Cavalry, 1863; “Cavalry Charge of Sully’s Brigade at the Battle of White Stone Hill, September 3, 1863,” Harper’s Weekly, October 31, 1863; District of Nebraska commander Brig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Americans
    INTERACT WITH HISTORY The year is 1861. Seven Southern states have seceded from the Union over the issues of slavery and states rights. They have formed their own government, called the Confederacy, and raised an army. In March, the Confederate army attacks and seizes Fort Sumter, a Union stronghold in South Carolina. President Lincoln responds by issuing a call for volun- teers to serve in the Union army. Can the use of force preserve a nation? Examine the Issues • Can diplomacy prevent a war between the states? • What makes a civil war different from a foreign war? • How might a civil war affect society and the U.S. economy? RESEARCH LINKS CLASSZONE.COM Visit the Chapter 11 links for more information about The Civil War. 1864 The 1865 Lee surrenders to Grant Confederate vessel 1864 at Appomattox. Hunley makes Abraham the first successful Lincoln is 1865 Andrew Johnson becomes submarine attack in history. reelected. president after Lincoln’s assassination. 1863 1864 1865 1864 Leo Tolstoy 1865 Joseph Lister writes War and pioneers antiseptic Peace. surgery. The Civil War 337 The Civil War Begins MAIN IDEA WHY IT MATTERS NOW Terms & Names The secession of Southern The nation’s identity was •Fort Sumter •Shiloh states caused the North and forged in part by the Civil War. •Anaconda plan •David G. Farragut the South to take up arms. •Bull Run •Monitor •Stonewall •Merrimack Jackson •Robert E. Lee •George McClellan •Antietam •Ulysses S. Grant One American's Story On April 18, 1861, the federal supply ship Baltic dropped anchor off the coast of New Jersey.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, som e thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of com puter printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 UMI EDWTN BOOTH .\ND THE THEATRE OF REDEMPTION: AN EXPLORATION OF THE EFFECTS OF JOHN WTLKES BOOTH'S ASSASSINATION OF ABRAHANI LINCOLN ON EDWIN BOOTH'S ACTING STYLE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Michael L.
    [Show full text]