Summary of Submissions Table

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Summary of Submissions Table Timaru District 2045 Draft Growth Management Strategy Submission Summary Timaru District 2045 Draft Growth Management Strategy SUBMISSION SUMMARY CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 APPENDIX A Questionaire ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 APPENDIX B Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Table 1 Degree of Agreement .................................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Table 2 Town Growth ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Table 3 Strategic Directions ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 APPENDIX C Key To Reading Summary of Submissions Table .............................................................................................................................. 10 APPENDIX D Schedule of Submitters .................................................................................................................................................................... 11 APPENDIX E Questionnaire Responses Chart (Submissions No.1 – No.33 Only) ................................................................................................ 13 Figure 1 Responses To Section A: Settlement Areas (Submissions No.1 – No.33 Only) ....................................................................................... 13 Figure 2 Responses To Section B: Strategic Directions (Submissions No.1 – No.33 Only) .................................................................................... 14 APPENDIX F Summary of Submissions ................................................................................................................................................................. 15 2 Timaru District 2045 Draft Growth Management Strategy SUBMISSION SUMMARY Contents INTRODUCTION DRAFT GROWTH MANAGEMENT NOTIFICATION SUBMISSIONS STRATEGY The Draft GMS was publicly notified on 1 A questionnaire was designed to gather The Timaru District Council has prepared April 2017 by way of public notices in the submissions using a scale of 1 -5 to the Draft Growth Management Strategy Timaru Herald, Timaru Courier and Council express the submitter’s degree of (the Draft GMS) recognising that Timaru website. Submissions closed on 12 May agreement on different topics of the Draft District is faced with: growth pressures; 2017. Timeframe extensions were granted GMS. The questionnaire is shown in changing demographics including an aging 16 May 2017 for those that requested it. Appendix A. Submissions no. 1 – no. 33 population; and a regulatory context to were made under the prescribed A total of 71 submissions were received consolidate growth in our existing questionnaire prepared by Council while on the Draft GMS. This document provides townships and a continuation of prudent submissions no. 34 – no. 71 were a summary of these submissions received. infrastructure choices. completed in the submitter’s own format. The full submissions are available as PDF Charts have been produced from This draft GMS has been prepared in files on the Council’s website at submissions no. 1 – no. 33 to demonstrate consultation with key stakeholders, and www.timaru.govt.nz/gms the submitter’s view on particular topic as intends to provide a direction for the shown in Appendix E growth and change of the district over the next 30 years. The stated position of each of the 71 submissions is provided in the summary of submissions table in Appendix F. This table outlines each submitter’s submission points with, a summary of the reasons / further comments for their position. 3 Timaru District 2045 Draft Growth Management Strategy SUBMISSION SUMMARY Introduction APPENDIX A QUESTIONAIRE 4 Timaru District 2045 Growth Management Strategy SUBMISSION SUMMARY Questionaire 5 Timaru District 2045 Growth Management Strategy SUBMISSION SUMMARY Questionaire 6 Timaru District 2045 Growth Management Strategy SUBMISSION SUMMARY Questionaire 7 Timaru District 2045 Growth Management Strategy SUBMISSION SUMMARY Questionaire 8 Timaru District 2045 Growth Management Strategy SUBMISSION SUMMARY Questionaire APPENDIX B ABBREVIATIONS TABLE 1 DEGREE OF AGREEMENT TABLE 2 TOWN GROWTH TABLE 3 STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS SA Strongly Agree Timaru Growth Approaches to TuGA AC A Agree Approach Challenges Geraldine D1 District character Neither Agree GGA NN Growth Approach Nor Disagree D2 Landscapes and amenity Pleasant Point PPGA D Disagree Growth Approach Settlement patterns and Temuka Growth D3 TeGA urban form SD Strongly Disagree Approach Building resilient Rural Residential D4 RRGA communities Growth Approach D5 Takata whenua NR New Rezone D6 Sustainable economy D7 Transport D8 Infrastructure D9 Rural D10 Residential Community and open D11 space Leadership and D12 partnership 9 Timaru District 2045 Growth Management Strategy SUBMISSION SUMMARY Abbreviations APPENDIX C KEY TO READING SUMMARY OF SUBMISSIONS TABLE Name of submitter Sub topics using abbreviations Degree of Reasons of Reference as shown in agreement on sub submission and Number Table 1 and topic using opinion/ further allocated to Table 2 of abbreviations as comments on level submission Appendix A shown in Table 3 of of agreement Number allocated 10 Timaru District 2045 Growth Management Strategy SUBMISSION SUMMARY Key To Reading Summary of Submissions Table to submission APPENDIX D Schedule of Submitters Sub No. Name Sub No. Name Sub No. Name 1 S Wolczuk 22 N Gilkison 41 Community and Public Health 2 L Burdon 23 P Brown 42 Ministry of Education CBD Investment and Strategy 24 Seadown Properties Limited GA & JL Ward and Footes 3 43 Group South Canterbury Federated Trustees Ltd 25 4 H Larsen Farmers of New Zealand PSE Properties 2012 Ltd and 44 5 Timaru District Holdings Limited 26 J Scott Hilton Haulage Ltd Partnership 6 M Thompson 27 R Payne Juice Products New Zealand 45 7 CA Eggeling 28 R Hay Limited South Canterbury Chamber of 8 K Beck 29 H Henderson 46 9 I Geary 30 A White Commerce 10 F Ross 31 Al Young 47 Majors Development Limited SM Fraser, AJ Shaw and PA 11 H Frank Al Young, Martock Holdings 48 12 T Titheridge Limited, N Campbell, NL Johnston 13 L Robertson 32 Newton, Mountain View Daries, 49 McFarlane Family Trust D & M Shefford, R Taylor, and P SM Fraser, AJ Shaw and PA 14 SD Barclay 50 15 I & A Pierce Hobbs Johnston BJ & JEM O'Keefe, DG & ML Earl, 33 N Robertson 51 Port Bryson Property Ltd 16 and J & S Nichelsen 34 KiwiRail Holdings Ltd 52 B Pipe 35 Foodstuff South Island Ltd Heritage New Zealand Pouhere GA Morton Family Trust, and GA 53 17 RP & PB Simmons Trustee Co Taonga & SA Morton 36 Rolling Ridges Trust, Russel & Limited 54 Milward Finlay Lobb Limited S Smith, Booker, Irvine, Watson, 55 NA & SI Walker 18 Pages Trust, Simstra Family 37 Moir and Leonard Levels Golfing Lifestyles Limited, Trust 56 19 C Wright 38 Alpine Energy Limited and Timaru Golf Club Harvey Norman Properties (N.Z.) 20 Canterbury Regional Council 39 P & L Bartrum 57 21 Insights Consultancy 40 New Zealand Transport Agency Limited 58 Clarebrook Farms Limited 11 Timaru District 2045 Growth Management Strategy SUBMISSION SUMMARY Schedule of Submitters Sub No. Name Sub No. Name 59 Timaru Civic Trust 69 P & J McLachlan 60 BA & TL Ellery 70 Davis Ogilvie (Aoraki) GW & DS Craig & MWS Clark, South Canterbury Branch, New 71 KW & SM Pyke, GA & SA Morton Zealand Institute of Surveyors & Woolcombe Trustees 2 61 Limited, GA & SA Morton, JR & JJ Ford, and PG & JA Wilkins & GJA Proudfoot DA & RM Coupland & MHS Trust Management Limited, MLS & RE 62 Talbot, CI & DI Mackenzie, and EH & KP Andrews & EO Sullivan ZJ Poplawski, CM & JL Morris, JM & NE Savage, ZJ Poplawski & HC Trustees 2009 Limited, J & B Family Trust, DC & CE Brand & 63 HC Trustees 2010 Limited, DK & MK Coupland & TM Simpson, and DA & RM Coupland & TM Simpson AJ & CA Brosnahan, AR & FE Gale, AS Rabbidge & HR Singline 64 & RSM Trust Limited, EA Pyke, FH Tong, BJ & HJ Walton & AN & DB Rountree Riverside Estate (2008) Limited, 65 and DE Ngaha & JM Hammond A McCleary, and G & M 66 Ladbrook 67 LP & JA Moodie 68 KD & MJ Cahill 12 Timaru District 2045 Growth Management Strategy SUBMISSION SUMMARY APPENDIX E QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSES CHART (SUBMISSIONS NO.1 – NO.33 ONLY) Figure 1 Responses To Section A: Settlement Areas (Submissions No.1 – No.33 Only) Responses to Section A: Settlement Areas Number of Respondances of Number Q1 Timaru Q2 Geraldine Q3 PLP Q4 Temuka Q5 Rural Residential Strongly Agree Agree Neighter Agree or Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree 13 Timaru District 2045 Growth Management Strategy SUBMISSION SUMMARY Questionnaire Responses Chart (Submissions No.1 – No.33 Only) Figure 2 Responses To Section B: Strategic Directions (Submissions No.1 – No.33 Only) 14 Responses to Section B: Strategic
Recommended publications
  • Timaru District Economic Development Strategy 2015-2035
    Timaru District Economic Development Strategy 2015-2035 1 Introduction Timaru is an area of enviable lifestyle and business opportunity. Located in the centre of the South Island it is a gateway to some of New Zealand’s most pristine and visited natural attractions. It is on the doorstep to the largest population centre in the South Island – Christchurch and surrounds. Timaru District, which is the economic hub of South Canterbury, has a population of 44,000 and has a higher than average standard of living when compared to the rest of New Zealand. (The broader are of South Canterbury has a population of 54,000, and includes the Timaru, Waimate and Mackenzie Districts, between the Rangitata and Waitaki rivers.) The elected leaders of Timaru District have expressed a strong and visionary desire to maintain, or even increase, this standard of living through stimulating and supporting sustainable business growth over the long term. This, they believe, will enhance and build on the lifestyle opportunities that are on offer in Timaru District leading to a much stronger (and more self-determining) future profile for the area. This strategy has been developed in consultation with the elected members of Timaru District Council and the directors of the Aoraki Development Business and Tourism (ADBT). While many of the actions are currently underway this strategy provides a ‘new direction’ which pulls together these and a number of new actions all heading towards the same goal. This strategy was adopted by Timaru District Council in February 2015 and is now available for public feedback. Notes: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Title: Timaru's District Wide Sewer Strategy Author
    Title: Timaru’s District Wide Sewer Strategy Author: Ashley Harper, Timaru District Council Abstract: Timaru’s District Wide Sewer Strategy Key Words: Wastewater Strategy, Working Party, Community, Oxidation Ponds, Wetlands, Trunk Sewers, Tunnels Introduction The Timaru District has four main urban areas, namely Timaru, and the inland towns of Geraldine, Pleasant Point and Temuka, with each of these areas having a traditional piped sewer network. The total population served within these urban areas is 40,000. #:872456 Since 1987 Timaru’s wastewater had been treated via a 0.5 milliscreening plant and associated ocean outfall, while each of the three inland towns utilised oxidation ponds and river discharge as the wastewater treatment and disposal process. In 1996 the Timaru District Council initiated a review of the respective wastewater treatment and disposal strategies, primarily because of emerging environmental and regulatory issues. Council supported a community based approach to identifying a preferred strategy, noting that the strategy needed to be robust and viable and to recognise the unique nature of the Timaru District’s effluent. Compliance with proposed environmental standards was a non negotiable requirement. Wastewater Working Party The community based approach involved the appointment of an experienced facilitator (Gay Pavelka) and the formation of a Wastewater Working Party in 1997. Membership of the working party was made up of representatives of the following organisations: Timaru District Council Community Boards
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand National Bibliography Online
    Publications New Zealand MATERIAL_TYPE: BOOK, SERIAL, MAP, MOVIE, MUSIC, PRINTED MUSIC, TALKING BOOK, COMPUTER FILE, KIT, OTHER LANGUAGE: ENGLISH SUBJECT: Temuka DEWEY_RANGE: 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,99 SORT_ORDER: TITLE REPORT RUN ON: 6/10/2013 12:09:12 AM 54 items returned Title "100 years in three days", 1866-1966 : the official history of the Temuka School and its centenary celebrations / by B.E. Gale. Author Gale, B. E. (Bryan Edmund) Publishing Details [Temuka : Temuka School Centennial Committee, 1966] ([Temuka] : Printers and Publishers) 1966 Physical Details 34 p. : ill., ports. ; 24 cm. Subject Temuka School History. Elementary schools New Zealand Temuka History. Formal Title Advocate (Temuka, N.Z.) Title Advocate. Publishing Details [Temuka, N.Z. : s.n., 1934] 1934 Frequency Weekly Publication 1934 Apr.13-1934? Numbering Subject Temuka (N.Z.) Newspapers. New Zealand newspapers lcsh Formal Title Evening standard (Temuka, N.Z.) Title Evening standard. Publishing Details [Temuka, N.Z. : s.n., 1933] 1933 Frequency Daily Publication 1933 Dec.1-1933 Dec.30 Numbering Subject Temuka (N.Z.) Newspapers. New Zealand newspapers. lcsh Title Map of Timaru, Temuka, Geraldine, Pleasant Point : scale 1:15 000. Author New Zealand. Dept. of Lands and Survey. Edition Ed. 2, 1982. Publishing Details [Wellington, N.Z.] : Dept. of Lands and Survey, 1982. 1982 Physical Details 4 maps on 1 sheet : col. ; 76 x 54 cm. or smaller, sheet 81 x 86 cm., folded to 21 x 12 cm. Series NZMS 271. Subject Timaru (N.Z.) Maps. Temuka (N.Z.) Maps. Geraldine (N.Z.) Maps. Pleasant Point (N.Z.) Maps.
    [Show full text]
  • CEN33 CSI Fish & Game Opihi River Flyer
    ACCESS ETIQUETTE • No dogs • No guns Opihi River • No camping • Leave gates as you find them • Stay within the river margins • Do not litter • Respect private property • Avoid disturbing stock or damaging crops • Do not park vehicles in gateways • Be courteous to local landowners and others Remember the reputation of ALL anglers is reflected by your actions FISHING ETIQUETTE • Respect other anglers already on the water • Enquire politely about their fishing plans • Start your angling in the opposite direction • Refer to your current Sports Fishing Guide for fishing regulations and bag limits A successful angler on the Opihi River Pamphlet published in 2005 Central South Island Region Cover Photo: Lower Opihi River upstream of 32 Richard Pearse Drive, PO Box 150, Temuka, New Zealand State Highway 1 Bridge Telephone (03) 615 8400, Facsimile (03) 615 8401 Photography: by G. McClintock Corporate Print, Timaru Central South Island Region THE OPIHI RIVER Chinook salmon migrate into the Opihi River ANGLING INFORMATION usually in February and at this time the fishing pressure in the lower river increases significantly. FISHERY The Opihi River supports good populations of As a result of warm nor-west rain and snow melt both chinook salmon and brown trout. In the The Opihi River rises in a small modified wetland waters from the mouth to about the State of approximately 2 hectares at Burkes Pass and the larger Rakaia and Rangitata Rivers often flood and during these times the spring fed Opihi Highway 1 bridge there is a remnant population flows in an easterly direction for about 80 km to of rainbow trout, survivors of Acclimatisation enter the Pacific Ocean 10 km east of Temuka.
    [Show full text]
  • Christchurch Newspapers Death Notices
    Christchurch Newspapers Death Notices Parliamentarian Merle denigrated whither. Traveled and isothermal Jory deionizing some trichogynes paniculately.so interchangeably! Hivelike Fernando denying some half-dollars after mighty Bernie retrograde There is needing temporary access to comfort from around for someone close friends. Latest weekly Covid-19 rates for various authority areas in England. Many as a life, where three taupo ironman events. But mackenzie later date when death notice start another court. Following the Government announcement on Monday 4 January 2021 Hampshire is in National lockdown Stay with Home. Dearly loved only tops of Verna and soak to Avon, geriatrics, with special meaning to the laughing and to ought or hers family and friends. Several websites such as genealogybank. Websites such that legacy. Interment to smell at Mt View infant in Marton. Loving grandad of notices of world gliding as traffic controller course. Visit junction hotel. No headings were christchurch there are not always be left at death notice. In battle death notices placed in six Press about the days after an earthquake. Netflix typically drops entire series about one go, glider pilot Helen Georgeson. Notify anyone of new comments via email. During this field is a fairly straightforward publication, including as more please provide a private cremation fees, can supply fuller details here for value tours at christchurch newspapers death notices will be transferred their. Loving grandad of death notice on to. Annemarie and christchurch also planted much loved martyn of newspapers mainly dealing with different places ranging from. Dearly loved by all death notice. Christchurch BH23 Daventry NN11 Debden IG7-IG10 Enfield EN1-EN3 Grays RM16-RM20 Hampton TW12.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Town Air Pollution E Wilton
    Managing air quality in small urban areas of NZ Emily Wilton – November 2006 Overview • Air quality in urban areas of NZ • Domestic heating methods in small urban areas • Practical air quality management – Policy options – Resource issues – establishing background and carrying out airshed modeling Urban areas Invercargill Gore Te Kuiti Westport Reefton Arrowtown Balclutha Milton Maximum 198 102 61 56 55 183 54 57 Year measured 2005 2004 2004 2002 2003 2003 1997 1999 Christchurch Rangiora Nelson Blenheim Hamilton Auckland Masterton Upper Hutt Maximum 223 136 165 80 67 81 104 61 Year measured 2001 2006 2001 2004 2001 1999 1999 2001 Oamaru Cromwell Timaru Kaiapoi Tokoroa Taupo Richmond Rotorua Maximum 61 97 195 163 97 65 111 90 Year measured 1998 2004 2006 2003 2004 2004 2003 2003 Ashburton Waimate Geraldine Whangarei Alexandra Mosgiel Napier Hastings Maximum 180 95 63 73 162 100 70 ~130 Year measured 2006 2006 2003 2000 2003 2003 2004 2005 Invercargill Gore Te Kuiti Westport Reefton Dunedin Alexandra Electricity 63% 50% 39% 35% 24% 77% 59% Total Gas 18% 16% 29% 27% 13% 20% 13% Flued gas 5% 5% 8% 5% 1% 7% 4% Unflued gas 13% 11% 21% 21% 13% 13% 9% Oil 3% 7% 1% 1% 1% 2% 5% Open fire 8% 5% 9% 9% 11% 11% 2% Total Woodburner 17% 20% 49% 22% 19% 14% 47% Multi-fuel burners 34% 48% 10% 48% 68% 6% 18% Pellet burners 2% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% Total wood 58% 72% 67% 79% 96% 30% 67% Total coal 39% 47% 5% 52% 67% 12% 9% Masterton Rangiora Timaru Auckland Nelson Richmond Hamilton Electricity 20% 51% 59% 48% 44% 48% 26% Total Gas 32% 20% 25% 35% 33% 22% 64%
    [Show full text]
  • Farmers' Market – a Community
    April 2016 Farmers’ Market – a community hub At a recent Project Wairarapa workshop to nurture resilience and sustainability in our town, I joined interested parties from all backgrounds to nut out ideas, create a framework, and construct an informed plan. We left on a high (too much coffee?) feeling we’d done our bit for the town. It was reassuring to feel the love in the room for the Farmers’ Market and its role in a resilient community and it left me thinking about its future. To date we have grown, overcome obstacles and tried new ideas with an overall goal merely to exist. But what are our core goals and what is our mission? After much contemplation I realised that the market should be about developing a hub – somewhere people can go to share their day. The market isn’t only for stallholders, regular customers or passing visitors. It’s a community event. We love that people can come for many reasons – make or spend some cash, speak on the Toastmasters stand to discuss issues important to them Roger Clarke yarns with Kevin and Jill Shipp at Carterton’s Farmers’ Market. or have a community stall to raise funds or awareness for Photo Don Farr. local causes; even just for somewhere to grab a coffee and say hi to others. We will continue to work with the Project Wairarapa team. Although the Farmers’ Market offers something for everyone within the community, resilience is not just about having food and supplies in an emergency – it also ensures that people interact, and know and support one another.
    [Show full text]
  • The Glacial Sequences in the Rangitata and Ashburton Valleys, South Island, New Zealand
    ERRATA p. 10, 1.17 for tufts read tuffs p. 68, 1.12 insert the following: c) Meltwater Channel Deposit Member. This member has been mapped at a single locality along the western margin of the Mesopotamia basin. Remnants of seven one-sided meltwater channels are preserved " p. 80, 1.24 should read: "The exposure occurs beneath a small area of undulating ablation moraine." p. 84, 1.17-18 should rea.d: "In the valley of Boundary stream " p. 123, 1.3 insert the following: " landforms of successive ice fluctuations is not continuous over sufficiently large areas." p. 162, 1.6 for patter read pattern p. 166, 1.27 insert the following: " in chapter 11 (p. 95)." p. 175, 1.18 should read: "At 0.3 km to the north is abel t of ablation moraine " p. 194, 1.28 should read: " ... the Burnham Formation extends 2.5 km we(3twards II THE GLACIAL SEQUENCES IN THE RANGITATA AND ASHBURTON VALLEYS, SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography in the University of Canterbury by M.C.G. Mabin -7 University of Canterbury 1980 i Frontispiece: "YE HORRIBYLE GLACIERS" (Butler 1862) "THE CLYDE GLACIER: Main source Alexander Turnbull Library of the River Clyde (Rangitata)". wellington, N.Z. John Gully, watercolour 44x62 cm. Painted from an ink and water­ colour sketch by J. von Haast. This painting shows the Clyde Glacier in March 1861. It has reached an advanced position just inside the remnant of a slightly older latero-terminal moraine ridge that is visible to the left of the small figure in the middle ground.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Gazette
    ~umb.· 127. 3721 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE WELLINGTON, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1940. Additional Land at Belfa,;;t taken far the Piirposes of the Additional Land taken far Post and Telegraph Purposes in the Hiirunui-Waitaki Railway. City of Christchurch. [ L.S.] GALWAY, Governor-General. [L.S.] GALWAY, Governor-General. A PROCLAMATION. A PROCLAl'VIATION. HEREAS it has been found desirable for the use, con­ N pursuance and exercise of the powers and authorities W venience, and enjoyment of the Hurunui-Waitaki I vested in me by the Public Works Act, 1928, and of Ra.ilway to take further land at Belfast in addition to land every other power and authority in anywise enabling me in previously acquired for the purposes of the said railway : this behalf, I, George Vere Arundell, Viscount Galway, Now, therefore, I, George Vere Arundel!, Viscount Galway, Governor-General of the Dominion of New Zealand, do Governor-General of the Dominion of New Zealand, in hereby proclaim and declare that the land described in the exercise of the powers and authorities conferred on me by Schedule hereto is hereby taken for post and telegraph sections thirty-four and two hundred and sixteen of the purposes; and I do also declare that this Proclamation shall Public Works Act, 1928, and of every other power and take effect on and after the twenty-third day of December, authority in anywise enabling me in this behalf, do hereby one thousand nine hundred and forty. proclaim and declare that the land described in the Schedule hereto is hereby taken for the purposes above mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Services Review of Water Storage Projects in Canterbury: the Opihi River Case
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Lincoln University Research Archive Ecosystem Services Review of Water Storage Projects in Canterbury: The Opihi River Case By Dr Edward J. S. Hearnshaw1, Prof Ross Cullen1 and Prof Ken F. D. Hughey2 1Faculty of Commerce and 2Faculty of Environment, Society and Design Lincoln University, New Zealand 2 Contents Executive Summary 5 1.0 Introduction 6 2.0 Ecosystem Services 9 3.0 The Opihi River and the Opuha Dam 12 4.0 Ecosystem Services Hypotheses 17 4.1 Hypotheses of Provisioning Ecosystem Services 17 4.2 Hypotheses of Regulating Ecosystem Services 19 4.3 Hypotheses of Cultural Ecosystem Services 20 5.0 Ecosystem Services Indicators 25 5.1 Indicators of Provisioning Ecosystem Services 27 5.2 Indicators of Regulating Ecosystem Services 36 5.3 Indicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services 44 6.0 Discussion 49 6.1 Ecosystem Services Index Construction 51 6.2 Future Water Storage Projects 56 7.0 Acknowledgements 58 8.0 References 59 3 4 Ecosystem Services Review of Water Storage Projects in Canterbury: The Opihi River Case By Dr Edward J. S. Hearnshaw1, Prof Ross Cullen1 and Prof Ken F. D. Hughey2 1Commerce Faculty and 2Environment, Society and Design Faculty, Lincoln University, New Zealand When the well runs dry we know the true value of water Benjamin Franklin Executive Summary There is an ever‐increasing demand for freshwater that is being used for the purposes of irrigation and land use intensification in Canterbury. But the impact of this demand has lead to unacceptable minimum river flows.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan
    Proposed Canterbury Land & Water Regional Plan Volume 1 Prepared under the Resource Management Act 1991 August 2012 Everything is connected 2541 Land and Water Regional Plan Vol 1.indd 1 12/07/12 1:23 PM Cover photo The Rakaia River, one of the region’s braided rivers Credit: Nelson Boustead NIWA 2541 Land and Water Regional Plan Vol 1.indd 2 12/07/12 1:23 PM (this page is intentionally blank) Proposed Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan Errata The following minor errors were identified at a stage where they were unable to be included in the final printed version of the Proposed Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan. To ensure that content of the Proposed Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan is consistent with the Canterbury Regional Council’s intent, this notice should be read in conjunction with the Plan. The following corrections to the Proposed Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan have been identified: 1. Section 1.2.1, Page 1-3, second paragraph, second line – delete “as” and replace with “if”. 2. Rule 5.46, Page 5-13, Condition 3, line 1 – insert “and” after “hectare”. 3. Rule 5.96, Page 5-23, Condition 1, line 1 – delete “or diversion”; insert “activity” after “established” (this page is intentionally blank) Proposed Canterbury Land & Water Regional Plan - Volume 1 KARANGA Haere mai rā Ngā maunga, ngā awa, ngā waka ki runga i te kaupapa whakahirahira nei Te tiakitanga o te whenua, o te wai ki uta ki tai Tuia te pakiaka o te rangi ki te whenua Tuia ngā aho te Tiriti Tuia i runga, Tuia i raro Tuia ngā herenga tangata Ka rongo te po, ka rongo te ao Tēnei mātou ngā Poupou o Rokohouia, ngā Hua o tōna whata-kai E mihi maioha atu nei ki a koutou o te rohe nei e Nau mai, haere mai, tauti mai ra e.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Inventory Canterbury Map Table 6.20
    Public conservation land inventory Canterbury Map table 6.20 Conservation Conservation Unit Name Legal Status Conservation Legal Description Description Unit number Unit Area I39021 Ahanui Conservation Area CAST 404.6 Stewardship Area - s.25 Conservation Act 1987 Priority ecosystem J38001 Kakahu River Marginal Strip CAMSM 4.5 Moveable Marginal Strip - s.24(1) & (2) Conservation Act 1987 - J38005 Hae Hae Te Moana River Conservation Reserve RALP 8.2 Local Purpose Reserve - s.23 Reserves Act 1977 - J38017 Conservation Area Waihi Riverbed CAST 0.4 Stewardship Area - s.25 Conservation Act 1987 - J38021 Conservation Area Geraldine Township CAST 0.1 Stewardship Area - s.25 Conservation Act 1987 - J38024 Raukapuka Area Office Conservation Area CAST 0.7 Stewardship Area - s.25 Conservation Act 1987 - J38026 Opihi River Conservation Reserve RALP 16.1 Local Purpose Reserve - s.23 Reserves Act 1977 - J38027 Waihi River Marginal Strip CAMS 0.0 Fixed Marginal Strip - s.24(3) Conservation Act 1987 - J38035 Mawaro Creek Marginal Strip CAMS 0.1 Fixed Marginal Strip - s.24(3) Conservation Act 1987 - J38036 Conservation Area Opihi Riverbed CAST 16.8 Stewardship Area - s.25 Conservation Act 1987 - J38040 Conservation Area McMasters Road CAST 0.3 Stewardship Area - s.25 Conservation Act 1987 - J38043 Hae Hae Te Moana River Conservation Reserve RALP 43.7 Local Purpose Reserve - s.23 Reserves Act 1977 - J38045 Gravel Reserve Te Moana Road RALP 2.2 Local Purpose Reserve - s.23 Reserves Act 1977 - J38051 Local Purpose Reserve Public Utility Winscombe RALP 0.4
    [Show full text]