South African Sugar Association
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
South Africa
Safrica Page 1 of 42 Recent Reports Support HRW About HRW Site Map May 1995 Vol. 7, No.3 SOUTH AFRICA THREATS TO A NEW DEMOCRACY Continuing Violence in KwaZulu-Natal INTRODUCTION For the last decade South Africa's KwaZulu-Natal region has been troubled by political violence. This conflict escalated during the four years of negotiations for a transition to democratic rule, and reached the status of a virtual civil war in the last months before the national elections of April 1994, significantly disrupting the election process. Although the first year of democratic government in South Africa has led to a decrease in the monthly death toll, the figures remain high enough to threaten the process of national reconstruction. In particular, violence may prevent the establishment of democratic local government structures in KwaZulu-Natal following further elections scheduled to be held on November 1, 1995. The basis of this violence remains the conflict between the African National Congress (ANC), now the leading party in the Government of National Unity, and the Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP), the majority party within the new region of KwaZulu-Natal that replaced the former white province of Natal and the black homeland of KwaZulu. Although the IFP abandoned a boycott of the negotiations process and election campaign in order to participate in the April 1994 poll, following last minute concessions to its position, neither this decision nor the election itself finally resolved the points at issue. While the ANC has argued during the year since the election that the final constitutional arrangements for South Africa should include a relatively centralized government and the introduction of elected government structures at all levels, the IFP has maintained instead that South Africa's regions should form a federal system, and that the colonial tribal government structures should remain in place in the former homelands. -
The Cholera Outbreak
The Cholera Outbreak: A 2000-2002 case study of the source of the outbreak in the Madlebe Tribal Authority areas, uThungulu Region, KwaZulu-Natal rdsn Edward Cottle The Rural Development Services Network (RDSN) Private Bag X67 Braamfontein 2017 Tel: (011) 403 7324 www.rdsn.org.za Hameda Deedat International Labour and Research Information Group (ILRIG) P.O. Box 1213 Woodstock 7915 Tel: (021) 447 6375 www.aidc.org.za/ilrig Edited by Dudley Moloi Sub-edited by Nicolas Dieltiens Funders: Municipal Services Project SOUTH AFRICAN MUNICIPAL WORKERS’ UNION Acknowledgements A special word of thanks to: Fieldworkers Dudu Khumalo and Sikhumbuso Khanyile from SAMWU KZN, for their help with the community interviews. And to our referees: Dr. David Hemson (Human Science Research Council) Dr. David Sanders (Public Health Programme, University of the Western Cape) Sue Tilley (Social Consultant) Stephen Greenberg (Social Consultant) Contents Executive summary 1 Section 1: Introduction 7 1.1 Objectives of the study 9 Section 2: Methodology 10 2.1 Research methods 10 2.1.1 Transepts 10 2.1.2 In-depth Interviews 11 2.1.3 Interviews in Ngwelezane 11 2.1.4 Interviews in the rural areas 12 2.1.5 Interviews with municipal officials 12 2.2 Limitations of the research 13 Section 3: The Policy Context 14 Section 4: The Geographic Context 16 4.1 A description of the area under Investigation 16 4.1.1 Introduction 16 4.1.2 Brief History 16 4.1.3 Demographic information 17 4.1.4 Economic Expansion 18 4.1.5 Climate & Disease 20 4.1.6 Water & Sanitation 20 4.2 Post-apartheid -
Ward 23 Has an Estimated Population of 10701 As Per Census 2011
WARD BASE PLAN 2017/2018 23 1 | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 4 2. WARD VISION – DESIRED FUTURE .................................................................................................. 4 3. WARD CHALLENGIES – CURRENT REALITY ...................................................................................... 4 4. SIZE OF THE WARD .......................................................................................................................... 5 5. WARD COMMITTEE STRUCTURE ..................................................................................................... 5 5.1 War Room Representatives .................................................................................................... 6 6. DEMOGRAPHICS .............................................................................................................................. 7 6.1 Population ............................................................................................................................... 7 6.2 Age and Gender Profile ........................................................................................................... 8 6.3 Language ................................................................................................................................. 8 6.4 Age Groups in 5 years by Population group and Gender........................................................ 9 -
Draft IDP 2019 2020
MTHONJANENI MUNICIPALITY 2019/2020 FINANCIAL YEAR DRAFT REVIEWED IDP 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION A: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................... 10 1.1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.- 1.2. WHO ARE WE .................................................................................................................... 10 1.3. CURRENT SITUATION .................................................................................................. 11 1.4. CURRENT EMPLOYMENT STATISTICS ................................................................... 11 1.5. TRADITIONAL AUTHORITIES ................................................................................... 13 1.6. WHAT ARE THE CHALLENGES WE FACE ............................................................... 14 1.7. MTHONJANENI MUNICIPAL VISION ...................................................................... 14 1.8. WHAT ARE WE DOING TO IMPROVE OURSELVES ............................................ 14 1.9. HOW WILL OUR PROGRESS BE MEASURED ......................................................... 19 1.10. SPATIAL VISION FOR THE MUNICIPALITY .......................................................... 19 1.11 PREPARATION – HOW WAS THIS IDP DEVELOPED .......................................... 21 1.11.1 THE PROCESS PLAN ....................................................................................................... 21 1.11.2. THE IDP ALIGNMENT PROCESS -
Umlalazi Strategic Planning Session
UMLALAZI STRATEGIC PLANNING SESSION INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Lizette Dirker IDP Coordination Business Unit INFORMANTS OF THE IDP SOUTH AFRICAN PLANNING SYSTEMS National Provincial Local District wide PGDS Vision 2030 DGDP (Vision 2035) (Vision 2035) National IDP PGDP Development 5 years Plan National Provincial Municipal Planning Planning Council Commission Commission WARD BASED SDGs SDGs PLANS “KZN as a prosperous Province with healthy, secure and skilled population, living in dignity and harmony, acting as a gateway to Africa and the World” Sustainable Development Goals AGENDA 2063 50 Year Vision • Agenda 2063 is a strategic framework for the socio-economic transformation of the continent over the next 50 years. It builds on, and seeks to accelerate the implementation of past and existing continental initiatives for growth and sustainable development Adopted in January 2015 • Adopted in January 2015, in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia by the 24th African Union (AU) Assembly of Heads of State and Government 10 Year implementation cycle • Five ten year implementation plan – the first plan 2014-2023 1. A prosperous Africa based on inclusive growth and sustainable 5. An Africa with a strong cultural development identity, common heritage, shared values and ethics 2. An integrated continent, politically united and based on the ideals of Pan-Africanism and the 6. An Africa whose development vision of Africa’s Renaissance is people-driven, relying on the potential of African people, especially its women and youth, and caring for children 3. An Africa of good governance, democracy, respect for human rights, justice and the rule of law 7. Africa as a strong, united and influential global player and partner 4. -
Provincial Clinic, CHC and Hospital Distances from Pietermaritzburg
Provincial Clinic, CHC and Hospital Distances from Pietermaritzburg Institution Name Distance (km) Health District Suburb Tel Code Tel Number A.E. Haviland Clinic 120.2 DC23 WEENEN 036 354 1872 Addington Clinic 81.97 Durban DURBAN 031 332 2111 Addington Hospital 81.97 Durban DURBAN 031 327 2000 Altona Clinic 421.29 DC26 PONGOLA 034 413 1707 Amakhabela Clinic 117.93 DC24 KRANSKOP 033 444 0662 Amaoti Clinic 84.17 Durban MOUNT EDGECOMBE 031 519 5967 Amatikulu Chronic Sick Home Hospital 163.93 DC29 AMATIKULU 032 453 0057 Amatimatolo Clinic 90.74 DC24 GREYTOWN 033 445 9319 Appelsbosch Hospital 65.45 DC22 OZWATHINI 032 294 0002 Assisi Clinic 155.58 DC21 PORT SHEPSTONE 039 695 9476 Ballito Clinic 116.72 DC29 BALLITO 032 946 8000 Baniyena Clinic 77.62 DC22 MOBENI 039 974 9004 Baphumile Clinic 153.24 DC21 PORT SHEPSTONE 039 684 7000 Beatrice Street Clinic 79.07 Durban CONGELLA 031 309 6222 Benedictine Hospital 294.83 DC26 NONGOMA 035 831 0314 Bethesda Hospital 369.42 DC27 UBOMBO 035 595 1004 Bhekumthetho Clinic 244.17 DC26 VRYHEID 038 933 0162 Bhekuzulu Clinic 270.39 DC26 VRYHEID 034 981 4892 Bhomela Clinic 189.18 DC21 PORT SHEPSTONE 039 685 0176 Bhoybhoyi Clinic 182.18 DC21 PORT SHEPSTONE 039 687 7831 Boom Street Clinic 3.86 DC22 PIETERMARITZBURG 033 395 1339 Bramhill Building Env. Health 2.83 DC22 PIETERMARITZBURG 033 394 1901 Bruntville CHC 64.42 DC22 MOOI RIVER 033 263 1545 Busingatha Clinic 201.87 DC23 ESTCOURT 036 438 6180 Buxdene Clinic 308.92 DC26 NONGOMA 035 838 0296 Caluza Clinic 11.66 DC22 PIETERMARITZBURG 033 399 3561 Catherine Booth -
Reconnaissance Study UAP Phase 2 UKDM
UNIVERSAL ACCESS PLAN (FOR WATER SERVICES) PHASE 2 PROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF A REGIONAL CONCEPT PLAN - UMKHANYAKUDE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY CONTRACT NO. 2015/178 RECONNAISSANCE STUDY FINAL JUNE 2016 Prepared for: Compiled by: Umgeni Water BIGEN AFRICA Services (Pty) Ltd 310 Burger Street, PMB Block B, Bellevue Campus, PO Box 9, PMB 5 Bellevue Road, Kloof, 3610 Tel: (033) 341 1111 PO Box 1469, Kloof, 3640 Fax: (033) 341 1084 Tel: +27(0) 31 717 2571 Attention: Mr Vernon Perumal Fax: +27(0) 31 717 2572 e-mail: [email protected] Enquiries: Ms Aditi Lachman In Association with: Universal Access Plan for Water Services Phase 2 Reconnaissance Study - uMkhanyakude District Municipality June 2016 REPORT CONTROL PAGE Report Control Client: Umgeni Water Project Name: Universal Access Plan (For Water Services) Phase 2: Progressive Development of a Regional Concept Plan Project Stage: Reconnaissance Study Report title: Progressive Development of a Regional Concept Plan – UKDM: Reconnaissance Study Report status: Final Project reference no: 2663-00-00 Report date: June 2016 Quality Control Written by: Njabulo Bhengu – Bigen Africa Reviewed by: Aditi Lachman – Bigen Africa Approved by: Robert Moffat – Bigen Africa Date: June 2016 Document Control Version History: Version Date changed Changed by Comments F:\Admin\2663\Reconnaissance Study Reports\UKDM\Reconnaissance Study_UAP Phase 2_UKDM_FINAL.docx i Universal Access Plan for Water Services Phase 2 Reconnaissance Study - uMkhanyakude District Municipality June 2016 Water Availability EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Water for domestic and commercial usage within the district is sourced from both surface and This report is the Reconnaissance Study for the Universal Access Plan Phase 2 – Progressive groundwater. -
Land Restitution and Protected Areas in Kwazulu Natal South Africa: Challenges to Implementation
University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2005 Land restitution and protected areas in KwaZulu Natal South Africa: Challenges to implementation Laurie Ashley The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Ashley, Laurie, "Land restitution and protected areas in KwaZulu Natal South Africa: Challenges to implementation" (2005). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 4801. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/4801 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY The University of Montana Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports. **Please check "Yes" or "No" and provide signature** Yes, I grant permission No, I do not grant permission Author's Signature: u___________ Date: ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's explicit consent. 8/98 Land Restitution and Protected Areas in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa: Challenges to Implementation Laurie Ashley B.A. Biology The University of Montana, 1998 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Resource Conservation Department of Society and Conservation The University of Montana May 2005 Approved by: Dean of Graduate School Date UMI Number: EP40265 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. -
Vision Statement “A MUNICIPALITY THAT PROVIDES SUSTAINABLE SERVICE DELIVERY, SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT and BETTER LIFE for ALL.”
Vision Statement “A MUNICIPALITY THAT PROVIDES SUSTAINABLE SERVICE DELIVERY, SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND BETTER LIFE FOR ALL.” Mission Statement “TO BE A PROFESSIONAL, EFFECTIVE, AN EFFICIENT AND RESULT ORIENTATED MUNICIPALITY THAT, THROUGH INTEGRATED EFFORT, CONTINUALLY PROMOTES THE SOCIAL WELFARE AND ECONOMIC PROSPERITY OF ALL ITS RESIDENTS, INVESTORS AND TOURISTS”. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1.1 Mayor’s Foreword 4 1.2 Council Speaker’s Message 6 1.3 Municipal Manager’s Overview 7 1.4 STATUTORY ANNUAL REPORT PROCESS PLAN 8 CHAPTER 2 – GOVERNANCE 9 2.1 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 10 2.2 BACKGROUND 18 2.3 SPATIAL ANALYSIS 21 2.4 DEMOGRAPHICS 30 CHAPTER 3 – SERVICE DELIVERY PERFORMANCE REPORT 36 3 Basic Services 36 3.1 Rural roads 36 3.2 Electrification 38 3.3.1 Role of the Developer/ Jozini Local Municipality 39 3.3.2 Role of the Funder/ Department of Human Settlements (DHS) 39 3.3.3 Current projects & Challenges 40 3.3.4 Current housing back log 41 3.3.5 Proposed packaging of housing project 42 3.4 Community Facilities 42 3.4.1 Renovations of community facilities 43 3.5 Waste removal 43 3.5.1 Mkuze 43 3.5.2 UBombo 44 3.5.3 Jozini 44 3.5.4 Bhambanana 44 3.5.5 Ndumo 44 3.5.6 Ingwavuma 44 3.5.7 Recycling Centre 44 3.5.8 Dumpsites 44 3.5.9 Addressing Illegal dump sites 44 3.6 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 45 3.6.1 IDP and Public Participation: 45 3.6.2 Jozini Town Nodal Expansion Plan: 45 3.6.3 Land Use Schemes for Jozini, Ingwavuma, Mkhuze, Bhambanana, Ubombo and Ndumo: 45 3.6.4 Building Plans 46 CHAPTER 4 - ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT -
Threatened Ecosystems in South Africa: Descriptions and Maps
Threatened Ecosystems in South Africa: Descriptions and Maps DRAFT May 2009 South African National Biodiversity Institute Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism Contents List of tables .............................................................................................................................. vii List of figures............................................................................................................................. vii 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 8 2 Criteria for identifying threatened ecosystems............................................................... 10 3 Summary of listed ecosystems ........................................................................................ 12 4 Descriptions and individual maps of threatened ecosystems ...................................... 14 4.1 Explanation of descriptions ........................................................................................................ 14 4.2 Listed threatened ecosystems ................................................................................................... 16 4.2.1 Critically Endangered (CR) ................................................................................................................ 16 1. Atlantis Sand Fynbos (FFd 4) .......................................................................................................................... 16 2. Blesbokspruit Highveld Grassland -
KZN Kcsub 022018 Mthonjan
!C !C^ ñ!.!C !C $ !C^ ^ ^ !C !C !C!C !C !C !C ^ ^ !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C !C $ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ^ ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C ^ ^ !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C $ !C !C ^ !C ^ !C !C !C ñ !C !C !C ^ !C !.ñ ñ!C !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C ^ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C ñ^ !C !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ñ !C !C ^ ^ !C !C !C !. !C ñ ^!C ^ !C ñ!C !C ^ ^ !C !C $ ^ $!C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C !.^ $ ñ !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C $ !C ^ !C !C $ !C !C ñ $ !. !C !C !C !C !C !C !. ^ ñ!C ^ ^ !C $!. ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !. !C !C ñ!C !C !C !C ^ñ !C !C ñ !C !C !. ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ñ ^ $ ^ !C ñ !C !. ñ!C ^ !C !. !C !C ^ ^ ñ !. !C !C $^ ^ñ ^ !C ^ ñ ^ ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C ^ !C $ !. ñ!C !C !C ^ ñ!C. ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C $!C ^!. !. !. !C !C !C !. ^ !C !C ^ !C ^ !C !C ñ !C !. -
Profile: King Cetshwayo District
01/52 King Cetshwayo District 2 PROFILE: KING CETSHWAYO DISTRICT PROFILE: KING CETSHWAYO DISTRICT 3 CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................... 5 2. Brief Overview .................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Historical Perspective ............................................................................................................... 6 2.2. Location .................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3. Spatial integration .................................................................................................................... 7 2.4. Land Ownership ....................................................................................................................... 7 3. Social Development Profile ............................................................................... 8 3.1. Key Social Demographics ......................................................................................................... 8 3.1.1. Population ............................................................................................................................. 8 3.1.2. Gender, Age and Race ........................................................................................................... 9 3.1.3. Household Profile ...............................................................................................................