DOCSLIB.ORG

Applying Theories of Digital Rhetoric, Procedural Rhetoric, and Electracy To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Applying Theories of Digital Rhetoric, Procedural Rhetoric, and Electracy To University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2018-01-01 Rethinking Multimodality In First-Year Composition: Applying Theories Of Digital Rhetoric, Procedural Rhetoric, And Electracy To Multimodal Assignments Jennifer Falcon University of Texas at El Paso, jennifer.a.falcon@gmail.com Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the Rhetoric Commons Recommended Citation Falcon, Jennifer, "Rethinking Multimodality In First-Year Composition: Applying Theories Of Digital Rhetoric, Procedural Rhetoric, And Electracy To Multimodal Assignments" (2018). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 1426. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/1426 This is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact lweber@utep.edu. RETHINKING MULTIMODALITY IN FIRST-YEAR COMPOSITION: APPLYING THEORIES OF DIGITAL RHETORIC, PROCEDURAL RHETORIC, AND ELECTRACY TO MULTIMODAL ASSIGNMENTS JENNIFER ANDREA FALCON Doctoral Program in Rhetoric and Composition APPROVED: Beth Brunk-Chavez, Ph.D., Chair Laura Gonzales, Ph.D. William Robertson, Ph.D. Charles Ambler, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © by Jennifer Andrea Falcon 2018 Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to my grandfather, José Franco Sandoval. Grandpa, your devotion to hard work and education will always guide me. RETHINKING MULTIMODALITY IN FIRST-YEAR COMPOSITION: APPLYING THEORIES OF DIGITAL RHETORIC, PROCEDURAL RHETORIC, AND ELECTRACY TO MULTIMODAL ASSIGNMENTS by JENNIFER ANDREA FALCON, M.F.A. DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of English THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO May 2018 Acknowledgements This, and any accomplishment of mine are the result of the hard work and sacrifice of my parents, Magdalena and Joe Falcon. Thank you to the Sandoval, Falcon, Arredondo, Workman, and Ahten families. Thank you Jonah, Maddie, Marissa, Emma, Owen, Eli, and Justin, for giving me seven reasons to keep working towards my goals. Thank you to Dr. Anisa Shomo, Dr. Kong Li, Dr. Dre Montes, Sarah Lerma, Jasmine Villa, and Sarah de le Garza for your friendship and support. This dissertation took shape under the guidance of Dr. Beth Brunk-Chavez, and would not have been completed without her constant encouragement and support. Beth, I thank you for being generous with your time, advice, and friendship. You are one of the reasons my time at UTEP was so enjoyable. I hope to one day be in a position to pay it forward and help a graduate student who asks too many questions. I’d like to thank Dr. Kate Mangelsdorf, Dr. Isabel Baca, Dr. Theresa Donovan, Dr. Judith Fourzan, Dr. Gustav, Dr. Maggie Smith, Dr. Helen Foster, and Dr. Lucia Dura for allowing me to learn and grow in their classrooms. Thank you to Dr. William Robertson and Dr. Laura Gonzales for their time and commitment to helping me complete this dissertation. v Table of Contents Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... viii List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ ix Chapter 1: Digital Multiliteracies and Multimodal Composition in First-Year Composition ........ 1 Definition of Terms ................................................................................................................ 3 Literacy and Digital Technology ........................................................................................... 8 Purpose of the Study ............................................................................................................ 13 Procedures ............................................................................................................................ 13 Significance of the Study ..................................................................................................... 15 Limitations of the Study ....................................................................................................... 15 Organization of the Study .................................................................................................... 15 Chapter 2: Review of Literature ................................................................................................... 17 Multiliteracies and Digital Literacies ................................................................................... 17 Rhetoric and Technology ..................................................................................................... 23 Multimodal Composition ..................................................................................................... 28 Digital Rhetoric .................................................................................................................... 34 Digital and Cultural Rhetoric ............................................................................................... 40 Procedural Rhetoric ............................................................................................................. 40 Electracy .............................................................................................................................. 41 Chapter 3: Methodology and Findings: Presentation of Data Collected from Surveys and Interviews ............................................................................................................................. 44 Qualitative Research Approach ........................................................................................... 44 Participants ........................................................................................................................... 46 Data Collection Tools .......................................................................................................... 46 Procedures ............................................................................................................................ 47 Thematic Analysis ............................................................................................................... 50 Ethical Considerations and Limitations ............................................................................... 51 Survey and Interview Findings ............................................................................................ 52 Standard Curriculum in First-Year Composition ................................................................. 57 Multimodal Composition Assignments in First-Year Composition Curriculum ................. 58 Assessment ........................................................................................................................... 67 Introducing Multimodal Practices ........................................................................................ 68 vi Pedagogy and Practices ........................................................................................................ 72 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 74 Chapter 4: Analysis of Common Approaches to Teaching Multimodal Assignments in First- Year Composition ................................................................................................................ 77 Review and Summary of Findings ....................................................................................... 80 Approach 1: Genre Theory .................................................................................................. 84 Approach 2: Rhetorical theory ............................................................................................. 86 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 88 Chapter 5: Recommendations for Incorporating Digital Rhetoric, Procedural Rhetoric, and Electracy in Teaching Digital Multimodal Assignments ..................................................... 91 Applying Procedural Rhetoric ............................................................................................. 95 Applying Electracy and Participatory Composition ............................................................ 97 Low-Stakes Multimodal Assignments in First-Year Composition .................................... 100 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 101 Future Research ................................................................................................................. 103 References ................................................................................................................................... 104 Appendix ..................................................................................................................................... 107 Vita 108 vii List of Tables Table 1 Summary of Survey Participants ....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Digital Humanities Pedagogy: Practices, Principles and Politics
    To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/161 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. Digital Humanities Pedagogy: Practices, Principles and Politics Edited by Brett D. Hirsch http://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2012 Brett D. Hirsch et al. (contributors retain copyright of their work). Some rights are reserved. The articles of this book are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported Licence. This license allows for copying any part of the work for personal and non-commercial use, providing author attribution is clearly stated. Details of allowances and restrictions are available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ As with all Open Book Publishers titles, digital material and resources associated with this volume are available from our website at: http://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/161 ISBN Hardback: 978-1-909254-26-8 ISBN Paperback: 978-1-909254-25-1 ISBN Digital (pdf): 978-1-909254-27-5 ISBN Digital ebook (epub): 978-1-909254-28-2 ISBN Digital ebook (mobi): 978-1-909254-29-9 Typesetting by www.bookgenie.in Cover image: © Daniel Rohr, ‘Brain and Microchip’, product designs first exhibited as prototypes in January 2009. Image used with kind permission of the designer. For more information about Daniel and his work, see http://www.danielrohr.com/ All paper used by Open Book Publishers is SFI (Sustainable Forestry Initiative), and PEFC (Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification Schemes) Certified.
    [Show full text]
  • Collin College in May 20162—
    Appellate Case: 18-6102 Document: 010110085921 Date Filed: 11/19/2018 Page: 1 Case No. 18-6102/ 18-6165 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ___________________ DR. RACHEL TUDOR, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. SOUTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY AND REGIONAL UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF OKLAHOMA, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants ___________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, Case No. 5:15-cv-324-C, Hon. Robin Cauthron ___________________ PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE DR. RACHEL TUDOR’S APPENDIX VOLUME 3 OF 9 ___________________ EZRA ISHMAEL YOUNG BRITTANY M. NOVOTNY LAW OFFICE OF EZRA YOUNG NATIONAL LITIGATION LAW GROUP 30 Devoe Street, #1A PLLC Brooklyn, NY 11211 2401 NW 23rd St., Ste. 42 (949) 291-3185 Oklahoma City, OK 73107 ezra@ezrayoung.com (405) 896-7805 bnovotny@nationlit.com MARIE EISELA GALINDO LAW OFFICE OF MARIE E. GALINDO Wells Fargo Bldg. 1500 Broadway, Ste. 1120 Lubbock, TX 79401 (806) 549-4507 megalindo@thegalindofirm.com Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee Case No. 18-6102/ 18-6165 Appellate Case: 18-6102 Document: 010110085921 Date Filed: 11/19/2018 Page: 2 VOLUME 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 15-CV-324-C – Relevant Docket Entries Appendix Filer Date of Doc Title of Pleading Pg. # Filing # 001-010 Plaintiff 12/29/2017 271 Reply to Defendants’ Opposition to Reinstatement 011-026 Plaintiff 12/29/2017 271- Reply to Response to 1 Motion for Order for Reinstatement Exhibit 1 Tudor Declaration 027-116 Plaintiff 12/29/2017 271- Reply
    [Show full text]
  • Composition Studies 42.1 (2014) from the Editor Hat’S the Best Part of Your Job?” a Student in Advanced Composition “Wasked Me This Question Last Week
    Volume 42, Number 1 Spring 2014 composition STUDIES composition studies volume 42 number 1 Composition Studies C/O Parlor Press 3015 Brackenberry Drive Anderson, SC 29621 New Releases First-Year Composition: From Theory to Practice Edited by Deborah Coxwell-Teague & Ronald F. Lunsford. 420 pages. Twelve of the leading theorists in composition stud- ies answer, in their own voices, the key question about what they hope to accomplish in a first-year composition course. Each chapter, and the accompanying syllabi, pro- vides rich insights into the classroom practices of these theorists. A Rhetoric for Writing Program Administrators Edited by Rita Malenczyk. 471 pages. Thirty-two contributors delineate the major issues and questions in the field of writing program administration and provide readers new to the field with theoretical lenses through which to view major issues and questions. Recently Released . Writing Program Administration and the Community College Heather Ostman. The WPA Outcomes Statement—A Decade Later Edited by Nicholas N. Behm, Gregory R. Glau, Deborah H. Holdstein, Duane Roen, & Edward M. White. Writing Program Administration at Small Liberal Arts Colleges Jill M. Gladstein and Dara Rossman Regaignon. GenAdmin: Theorizing WPA Identities in the Twenty-First Century Colin Charlton, Jonikka Charlton, Tarez Samra Graban, Kathleen J. Ryan, & Amy Ferdinandt Stolley and with the WAC Clearinghouse . Writing Programs Worldwide: Profiles of Academic Writing in Many Places Edited by Chris Thaiss, Gerd Bräuer, Paula Carlino, Lisa Ganobcsik-Williams, & Aparna Sinha International Advances in Writing Research: Cultures, Places, Measures Edited by Charles Bazerman, Chris Dean, Jessica Early, Karen Lunsford, Suzie Null, Paul Rogers, & Amanda Stansell www.parlorpress.com 2013–2014 Reviewers A journal is only as good as its reviewers.
    [Show full text]
  • Multimodality in Malaysian Schools: the Case for the Graphic Novel
    The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science 2015 (Volume 3 - Issue 2) [1] thusharanee@gmail.com Multimodality in Malaysian Schools: The Faculty of Languages and Linguistics University of Malaya, MALAYSIA Case for the Graphic Novel Thusha Rani Rajendra [1] ABSTRACT This paper aims at exploring the benefits of including graphic novels as a wholesome supplement in Malaysian schools. Research has indicated that the mono‐modality of traditional linear texts may impede comprehension. The emphasis on multi‐literacies clearly scaffold the need to employ multimodality in the classrooms; hence the suggestion of introducing graphic novels. Once placed at the bottom of the literary heap and viewed as a light reading material, this medium has been enjoying much popularity especially in the West. Graphic novels are able to stimulate reluctant readers’ interests besides being a challenge to students familiar with traditional literature. As part of an on‐going research which investigates how verbal and textual elements are represented in graphic novels, this paper discusses the advantages of including graphic novels especially in Malaysian schools. With the advent of multimodality through various platforms, graphic novels are interesting as an alternative mainstream multimodal medium. As an innovative and creative pedagogic supplement, graphic novels offer a multitude of learning and teaching experiences Keywords: Graphic novels; Comics; Visual literacy; Multimodality; Multi‐ literacies INTRODUCTION The constant evolvement of literacy is truly challenging and there is an urgent need to embrace changes that comes with this development. As progressive educators, the challenge is to face this reality and the need to implement pedagogical practices that support these dynamic changes.
    [Show full text]
  • ENC 1136: Multimodal Writing & Digital Literacy ENC1136
    ENC 1136: Multimodal Writing & Digital Literacy ENC1136 (Section 9122, Class 23684, SP20) Brandon Murakami MWF:3 (9:35-10:25a) dmurakami@ufl.edu Room: M: WEIL 408D / WF: WEIL 408E OH: TBA COURSE DESCRIPTION Multimodal Composition teaches digital literacy and digital creativity. This course teaches students to compose and circulate multimodal documents in order to convey creative, well- researched, carefully crafted, and attentively written information through digital platforms and multimodal documents. This course promotes digital writing and research as central to academic, civic, and personal expression. COURSE OBJECTIVES Multimodal writing objectives are designed to teach students how to compose, revise, and circulate information in digital forms. The course emphasizes: • Applying composing processes in digital forms • Demonstrating invention/creativity approaches when working with digital resources and tools • Choosing which digital tools best serve contextual needs • Creating documents in six different forms that contribute to multimodal production (see below) • Using problem-solving methods to navigate digital tools • Appraising methods for self-guided learning about emerging digital tools (i.e. learning how to learn) REQUIRED MATERIALS Note: Many of the “readings” assigned in this class will be online tutorials for using the digital tools needed to compose, produce, and circulate the assigned documents. Because the course focuses on hands-on, active production, the focus of readings often will be tutorials and student work for critique. All texts will be provided on our course website on Canvas. GENERAL EDUCATION OBJECTIVES: COMPOSITION (C) Composition courses provide instruction in the methods and conventions of standard written English (i.e. grammar, punctuation, usage) and the techniques that produce effective texts.
    [Show full text]
  • Meaning Making and Communication in the Multimodal Age: Ideas for Language Teachers Construcción De Significados Y Comunicació
    RESEARCH ARTICLES Meaning making and communication in the multimodal age: ideas for language teachers Construcción de significados y comunicación en la era multimodal: ideas para profesores del lenguaje José Aldemar Álvarez Valencia1 Citation/ Para citar este Artículo: Álvarez, J. (2016). Meaning Making and Communication in the Multimodal Age: Ideas for Language Teachers. Colomb. Appl.Linguist.J., 18(1), pp 98-115 Received: 11-Apr-2015 / Accepted: 23-Feb-2016 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14483/calj.v18n1.8403 Abstract Contemporary societies are grappling with the social changes caused by the current communication landscape and complex textual habitats. To account for this complexity in meaning-making practices, some scholars have proposed the multimodal approach. This paper intends to introduce the core concepts of multimodality including semiotic resources, modes of communication, and intersemiotic relationships. It provides practical applications of multimodal analyses by examining printed and digital pages of educational materials. The final section proposes a set of recommendations to integrate the multimodal perspective in language classes, highlighting the need to make students aware of the new dynamics of meaning making, meaning negotiation, and meaning distribution. Keywords: intersemiotic relationships, meaning making, mode of communication, multimodality, semiotic resources Resumen Las sociedades contemporáneas están enfrentándose a los cambios sociales provocados por el paisaje de comunicación actual y las complejidades de los hábitats textuales. Para dar cuenta de la complejidad en la construcción de significados, algunos académicos han propuesto el enfoque multimodal. Este escrito tiene la intención de introducir los conceptos básicos de la multimodalidad, tales como recursos semióticos, modos de comunicación y relaciones intersemióticas.
    [Show full text]
  • ULMER - Introduction: Electracy 1 to Comment on SPECIFIC PARAGRAPHS, Click on the Speech Bubble Next to That Paragraph
    ULMER - Introduction: Electracy 1 To comment on SPECIFIC PARAGRAPHS, click on the speech bubble next to that paragraph. There is an analogy for what we are doing when we collaboratively explore the possibilities of new media. We are to the Internet what students of Plato and Aristotle were to the Academy and Lyceum. When the Greeks invented alphabetic writing they were engaged in a civilizational shift from one apparatus to another (from orality to literacy). They invented not only alphabetic writing but also a new institution (School) within which the practices of writing were devised. Here is the salient point: all the operators of “science” as a worldview had to be invented, by distinguishing from religion a new possibility of reason. Electracy similarly is being invented, not to replace religion and science (orality and literacy), but to supplement them with a third dimension of thought, practice, and identity. “Electracy” is to digital media what literacy is to alphabetic writing: an apparatus, or social machine, partly technological, partly institutional. We take for granted now the skill set that orients literate people to the collective mnemonics that confront anyone entering a library or classroom today. Grammatology (the history and theory of writing) shows that the invention of literacy included also a new experience of thought that led to inventions of identity as well: individual selfhood and the democratic state. Thus there are three interrelated invention streams forming a matrix of possibilities for electracy, only one of which is technological. There is no technological determinism, other than the fundamental law of change: that everything is mutating together into something other, different, with major losses and gains.
    [Show full text]
  • View Bad Ideas About Writing
    BAD IDEAS ABOUT WRITING Edited by Cheryl E. Ball & Drew M. Loewe BAD IDEAS ABOUT WRITING OPEN ACCESS TEXTBOOKS Open Access Textbooks is a project created through West Virginia University with the goal of produc- ing cost-effective and high quality products that engage authors, faculty, and students. This project is supported by the Digital Publishing Institute and West Virginia University Libraries. For more free books or to inquire about publishing your own open-access book, visit our Open Access Textbooks website at http://textbooks.lib.wvu.edu. BAD IDEAS ABOUT WRITING Edited by Cheryl E. Ball and Drew M. Loewe West Virginia University Libraries Digital Publishing Institute Morgantown, WV The Digital Publishing Institute believes in making work as openly accessible as possible. Therefore, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This license means you can re-use portions or all of this book in any way, as long as you cite the original in your re-use. You do not need to ask for permission to do so, although it is always kind to let the authors know of your re-use. To view a copy of this CC license, visit http://creative- commons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. This book was set in Helvetica Neue and Iowan Old Style and was first published in 2017 in the United States of America by WVU Libraries. The original cover image, “No Pressure Then,” is in the public domain, thanks to Pete, a Flickr Pro user.
    [Show full text]
  • Students with Disabilities in the Honors Program
    SETTING THE TABLE FOR DIVERSITY Editors Lisa L. Coleman and Jonathan D. Kotinek Jeffrey A. Portnoy Georgia Perimeter College jeffrey.portnoy@gpc.edu General Editor, NCHC Monograph Series Published in 2010 by National Collegiate Honors Council 110 Neihardt Residence Center University of Nebraska-Lincoln 540 N. 16th Street Lincoln, NE 68588-0627 (402) 472-9150 FAX: (402) 472-9152 Email: nchc@unlserve.unl.edu http://www.NCHChonors.org © Copyright 2010 by National Collegiate Honors Council International Standard Book Number 978-0-9825207-2-7 Managing Editor: Mitch Pruitt Production Editor: Cliff Jefferson Wake Up Graphics, Birmingham, AL Printed by EBSCO Media, Birmingham, AL TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements. 5 Foreword . 9 Jonathan D. Kotinek Introduction: Changing Our Selves, Changing the World: Setting the Table for Diversity . 11 Lisa L. Coleman Part I: Defining Diversity in Honors Setting the Table for Diversity . 21 Ellen Riek and Kathryn Sheridan African American Males and Honors Programs: Why Are Enrollments So Low? What Can Be Done? . 31 Bridal Pearson and Deborah Kohl Welcoming Einstein: Students with Disabilities in the Honors Program . 41 Doreen Arcus Mira al Espejo: A Reflection on Serving Latina/o Honors Students in Texas . 61 Michael R. DeLeon International Students and the Challenges of Honors. 77 Gergana Yaneva, John Zubizarreta, and Natalia Miteva Part II: Diversity Challenges and Opportunities African American Males in Honors Programs: Suggestions and Best Practices for Success . 91 Esther Materón-Arum How Honors Programs Can Assist in the Transition of Gifted First-Generation and African American College Students . 99 Lisa Brockenbrough Sanon-Jules The Dominican University Honors Program and Service Learning: Case Studies Focusing on Engaged Learning and Social Responsibility in Diverse Communities .
    [Show full text]
  • A Socio-Semiotic Multimodal Analysis of Emojis As Used in Text Messaging
    A SOCIO-SEMIOTIC MULTIMODAL ANALYSIS OF EMOJIS AS USED IN TEXT MESSAGING JARED OTIENO SADIA A Research Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Award of the Degree of Masters of Arts in Linguistics University of Nairobi 2018 i DECLARATION ii DEDICATION For Damianus Sadia Recently departed, You are immortalized in print iii ACKNOWLEGMENTS No ingenious work of research is ever done in complete isolation. The completion and success of this work was realized due to the contributions, guidance, support, advice and motivation accorded to me by a great number of people and in whose gesture, I wish to express my heartfelt gratitude. I acknowledge with lots of appreciation the patience, scholarly advice and guidance of my supervisor, Dr. Catherine Agoya. In addition I am truly grateful to all the members of the linguistic and language department of The University of Nairobi, and more particularly, those who walked me through the various courses at the university. I extend my appreciation to my family members whose endurance, resilience and mettle remains unshaken even in times of vicissitudes. My indefatigable mother, Pamela Adoyo Sadia- you whose strength and will, I draw immensely from, my siblings Naphtali, Gladys, Maureen, Robert, Cynthia, Grace, George, Lawrence and Samantha. Thank you for always believing in me. iv ABSTRACT The goal of this study was the analysis of emojis using socio semiotic multimodal theory by Kress & Leeuwen (2006). Many studies on emojis have largely specialized in examining them purely on the basis of provision of emotions in computer mediated communication (CMC) more specifically, online writing.
    [Show full text]
  • An Interview with Gregory L. Ulmer
    SERGIO C. FIGUEIREDO Kennesaw State University THEOPRAXESIS AND THE FUTURE OF H’MMM IN THE UNIVERSITY: AN INTERVIEW WITH GREGORY L. ULMER n early 2015, Craig Saper and Victor Vitanza, in consultation with Gregory Ulmer, edited a collection essays by Ulmer addressing the social, cultural, political and institutional changes underway in the apparatus, or “social machine”, shift from literacy to electracy, Electracy: Gregory L. Ulmer’s Textshop Experiments. As Saper and Vitanza explain in the preface, the significance of Ulmer’s work is the re-motivation of theoretical knowledge into applied knowledge: “Ulmer takes us from Derrida’s Grammatology (knowing) to an Applied Grammatology (doing and making)”1. Many of the essays in this collection are preambles to his book projects, such Applied Grammatology (1985), Teletheory (1989), Heuretics (1994), Internet Invention (2003), Electronic Monuments (2005), and, most recently, Avatar Emergency (2012). As early as 1981, Ulmer recognized the coming influence of electronic media on culture and society, writing that “the humanities disciplines are in a state of transition that is leading them, however gradually, to a complete redefinition, a reapportionment of boundaries. […] The consequence of the theories of deconstruction, écriture, semiotics, and so forth for academic work are clear, at least in general terms—the dissolution of the boundaries separating the officially recognized educational institution from the culture as a whole: from the mass media and the entertainment industry. In epistemic terms this means that the educational institution is entering the television age”2. In contemporary parlance, the “television age” has given way to networks facilitated by and enhanced by computing technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Multimodality in Discussion Sessions: Corpus Compilation and Pedagogical Mercedes Querol-Julián 1-26
    Language Value December 2010, Volume 2, Number 1 http://www.e-revistes.uji.es/languagevalue Copyright © 2010, ISSN 1989-7103 Table of Contents From the editors Mari Carmen Campoy Cubillo and Miguel F. Ruiz Garrido i-iv Articles Multimodality in discussion sessions: corpus compilation and pedagogical Mercedes Querol-Julián 1-26 An approach to corpus-based language and multimodal features in communicative exchanges at early age for adapted hypermedia content design Alejandro Curado Fuentes 27-50 Sounding natural: improving oral presentation skills Maria Grazia Busà 51-67 Changing Spaces, Expanding Mindsets: Towards L2 literacies on a multimodal reading comprehension course Heidi Vaarala and Juha Jalkanen 68-99 Multimodality and listening comprehension: Testing and implementing classroom material Elena Domínguez Romero and Carmen Maíz Arévalo 100-139 Book and Multimedia Reviews Gena R. Bennet. Using CORPORA in the Language Learning Classroom: Corpus Linguistics for Teachers. Nur Yigitoglu 140-143 Andre Gillet. Using English for Academic Purposes. A Guide for Students in Higher Education. Mónica-Stella Cárdenas-Clarós 144-151 Copyright © 2010 Language Value, ISSN 1989-7103. Articles are copyrighted by their respective authors Language Value December 2010, Volume 2, Number 1 pp. i-iv http://www.e-revistes.uji.es/languagevalue Copyright © 2010, ISSN 1989-7103 From the Editors MULTIMODALITY IN ELT This issue addresses Multimodality in English Language Teaching. Multimodality refers to the combination of various communicative modes (sound, images such as graphs or pictures, video, written text, transcribed speech, etc.) within one text. We talk of multimodal text because understanding that text implies understanding the interaction among all its components in the different formats.
    [Show full text]