Habitat Regulations Assessment Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Habitat Regulations Assessment Of ED.3.17 Habitats Regulations Assessment of the Stratford-on-Avon District Council Core Strategy Screening Report Client: Stratford-on-Avon District Council Report Title: Habitats Regulations Assessment of the Stratford-on-Avon Core Strategy Status: Final Version: 1 Filename: LC-0026_Stratford_Core_Strategy_HRA_2_060712MGP Date: 6th July 2012 Author: Mike Paginton Checked: Nick Hargreaves Approved: Neil Davidson Habitats Regulations Assessment of the Stratford-on-Avon Core Strategy July, 2012 LC-0026_Stratford_Core_Strategy_HRA_2_060712MGP Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 2 About the Core Strategy ..................................................................................................... 5 3 Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 11 4 Determination of Need ..................................................................................................... 15 5 European Sites ................................................................................................................... 17 6 Screening: Initial Appraisal ............................................................................................... 25 7 Screening: Further Assessment ........................................................................................ 41 8 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................ 49 References ................................................................................................................................. 51 Appendix A European Site Record .......................................................................................... 53 Lepus Consulting Habitats Regulations Assessment of the Stratford-on-Avon Core Strategy July, 2012 LC-0026_Stratford_Core_Strategy_HRA_2_060712MGP List of Tables and Figures Figure 1.1: Location of Stratford-on-Avon District Figure 3.1: The 13 Key Stages of the Habitats Regulations Appraisal Process Figure 4.1: Determining if a plan should be subject to a Habitats Regulations Appraisal Figure 5.1: Location of European sites within proximity to Stratford-on-Avon District Figure 7.1: Water Quality in the Warwickshire Avon Catchment Table 2.1: Core Strategy Policies Table 3.1: Stages of HRA Table 3.2: Dealing with Uncertainty Table 5.1: Criteria for identification of European sites Table 5.2: European sites within the vicinity or connected to Stratford District Table 5.3: Identified vulnerabilities of European sites Table 6.1: Screening Matrix Table 6.2: In-combination matrix of Stratford Draft Core Strategy 2012 policies Table 6.3: In-combination matrix of Stratford Draft Core Strategy with other plans and strategies Table 7.1: Warwickshire Avon Catchment Key Statistics Table 7.2: WwTW without Consented Headroom (Source URS, 2012) Table 8.1: Potential Impacts of Policy CS16 upon European Sites Table 8.2: Potential Impacts of Policy CS22 upon European Sites Table 8.3: Potential Impacts of Policy CS23 upon European Sites Table 8.4: Potential Impacts of Policy CS24 upon European Sites Table 8.5: Potential Impacts of Policy CS26 upon European Sites Table 8.6: Potential Impacts of Policy CS28 upon European Sites Table 9.1: Mitigation measures for potential impacts upon European sites Lepus Consulting Habitats Regulations Assessment of the Stratford-on-Avon Core Strategy July, 2012 LC-0026_Stratford_Core_Strategy_HRA_2_060712MGP Abbreviations AQMA Air Quality Management Area CAMS Catchment Area Management Strategy CLG Department of Communities and Local Government CO2 Carbon dioxide GI Green Infrastructure HRA Habitats Regulations Assessment IROPI Imperative Reason for Overriding Public Interest NPPF National Planning Policy Framework RBMP River Basin Management Plan RoC Review of Consent SAC Special Area of Conservation SFRA Strategic Flood Risk Assessment SPA Special Protection Areas SPD Supplementary Planning Document SSSI Site of Special Scientific Importance STW Severn Trent Water SuDS Sustainable Drainage Systems WFD Water Framework Directive WRMP Water Resource Management Plan WwTW Waste Water Treatment Works Lepus Consulting Ltd Habitats Regulations Assessment of the Stratford-on-Avon Core Strategy July, 2012 LC-0026_Stratford_Core_Strategy_HRA_2_060712MGP This page is intentionally blank for the purposes of double-sided printing. Lepus Consulting Ltd Habitats Regulations Assessment of the Stratford-on-Avon Core Strategy July, 2012 LC-0026_Stratford_Core_Strategy_HRA_2_060712MGP Executive Summary E1 Introduction E1.1 Lepus Consulting on behalf of Stratford-on-Avon District Council is preparing an initial screening report for Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) of the Stratford- on-Avon District third Draft Core Strategy (February, 2012). The initial screening assessment focuses on the likely significant effects of the Core Strategy on the nature conservation interests of European-protected areas within 20km or connected to the Stratford-on-Avon District. It seeks to establish whether or not there could be any adverse effects on the ecological integrity of these European sites as a result of proposals in the plan. This initial screening assessment is designed to act as an early warning system that identifies any potential HRA issues at this early stage which could arise as a result of the proposals within the Core Strategy. E1.2 European sites are areas of international nature conservation importance that are protected for the benefit of the habitats and species they support. The report explores how the integrity of European sites within, close to or connected to the district has a bearing on core strategy principles. E1.3 This report identifies: European sites within proximity to the assessment area; European sites unlikely to suffer significant effects of the Draft Core Strategy; European sites likely to be effected by the policies of the Draft Core Strategy; Policies that will not lead to likely significant effects upon European sites; In-combination assessment of policies and their interaction with other plans and programmes; Assessment of the likely significant effects of Stratford-on-Avon District Draft Core Strategy policies upon European sites; and Appropriate avoidance and mitigation measures. E2 Scope E2.1 The following European sites were identified using a 20km area of search around Stratford District including sites which are potentially connected (e.g. hydrologically): Bredon Hill SAC; Dixton Wood SAC; Fens Pools SAC; Lyppard Grange Ponds SAC; Lepus Consulting Ltd i Habitats Regulations Assessment of the Stratford-on-Avon Core Strategy July, 2012 LC-0026_Stratford_Core_Strategy_HRA_2_060712MGP Oxford Meadows SAC; Severn Estuary SAC; Severn Estuary SPA; Severn Estuary Ramsar; and Wye Valley SAC. E3 Findings E3.1 Of the nine European sites identified, four were screened out. Assessment of their vulnerabilities coupled with absence of obvious links (e.g. hydrologically) by which impacts could be transferred, distance from Stratford-on-Avon District and small size are all reasons for this conclusion. The screened out sites are as follows: Bredon Hill SAC; Dixton Wood SAC; Fens Pools SAC; and Oxford Meadows SAC. E3.2 The five sites where potential significant effects could not be ruled out due to uncertainties in regards to impacts from a water resources and water quality perspective. These sites include: Lyppard Grange Ponds SAC; Severn Estuary SAC; Severn Estuary SPA; Severn Estuary Ramsar; and River Wye SAC. E3.3 The initial screening assessment identified that the following policies can be screened out as having no likely significant effects upon European sites: Policy CS1: Sustainable Development; Policy CS2: Climate Change and Sustainable Energy; Policy CS3: Safeguarding the Water Environment; Policy CS4: Managing Waste; Policy CS5: Minerals; Policy CS6: Green Belt; Policy CS7: Areas of Restraint; Policy CS8: Cotswolds AONB; Policy CS9: Vale of Evesham Control Zone; Policy CS10: Landscape; Policy CS11: Natural Features; Policy CS12: Heritage Assets; Policy CS13: Green Infrastructure; Policy CS14: Earlswood Lakes Country Park; Lepus Consulting Ltd ii Habitats Regulations Assessment of the Stratford-on-Avon Core Strategy July, 2012 LC-0026_Stratford_Core_Strategy_HRA_2_060712MGP Policy CS15: Design and Distinctiveness; Policy CS17: Affordable Housing; Policy CS18:Protection and Adaptation of the Existing Housing Stock; Policy CS19: Specialised Accommodation; Policy CS20: Housing Mix and Type; Policy CS21: Provision for Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople; Policy CS25: Countryside and Villages; Policy CS27: Community Facilities; and Policy CS29: Infrastructure for Growth and Developer Contributions. E3.4 Six policies were assessed in further detail to explore potential significant effects upon the integrity of European sites. These policies were as follows: Policy CS16: Spatial Distribution of Development; Policy CS22: Economic Development; Policy CS23: Retail Development – Town and Local Centres; Policy CS24: Tourism Development; Policy CS26: Large Rural Brownfield Sites; and Policy CS28: Transport and Communication. E3.5 Besides these six policies the following area policy profiles were appraised: APP1: Stratford-upon-Avon;
Recommended publications
  • Journey 400 Repaired.Indd
    A journey across 400 million yearsA journey 400 million years across The story of geology & landscape 610 570 510 440 410 360 290 245 210 145 65 0 Ediacaran Cambrian Ordovician Silurian Devonian Carboniferous Permian inTriassic SouthJurassic GloucestershireCretaceous Caenozoic Era 1 Palaeozoic Era Mesozoic Era Skull and front flipper of an Ichthyosaurus © Copyright South Gloucestershire Council (x0.2) � � All rights reserved LA100023410, 2007 � One of the early Jurassic marine reptiles � � ��������� known as ‘Sea Dragons’ (Bristol Museum) � �������� �������� � �� A journey 400 million years across � ��������� N � ��������� � �� � � ��������� �� �� � � � � � � � ������������ �������� �������� � � � ���� � � ������� � � � �� �� ����������� �� �� ���������� ������ ����� ����� ������� ����������� � � � � � ���� � Introduction ����� �������� � ��������� � ������� ��� � �������� � � ��������� ������� � ������� This booklet tells the story of Some sites, such as Aust Cliff, will �� ����� ������������ �� the geological history of South require an hour or two to explore �������� ���� � � � � ������� � ����� �������������� Gloucestershire, spanning some fully. Others – where the rocks � ����� � ������� � � ��������� 400 million years. are physically inaccessible or in a ����� � � dangerous location, like a working ������ � � �������� � �� � � It involves vast, almost unimaginable quarry – can only be viewed from a � � ������������ ������� �������� earth movements and dramatic, specific, safe vantage point. ����� radical changes in continents, ������
    [Show full text]
  • BRSUG Number Mineral Name Hey Index Group Hey No
    BRSUG Number Mineral name Hey Index Group Hey No. Chem. Country Locality Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-37 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] U.K., 17 Basset Mines, nr. Redruth, Cornwall Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-151 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] U.K., 17 Phoenix mine, Cheese Wring, Cornwall Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-280 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] U.K., 17 County Bridge Quarry, Cornwall Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and South Caradon Mine, 4 miles N of Liskeard, B-319 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] U.K., 17 Cornwall Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-394 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] U.K., 17 ? Cornwall? Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-395 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] U.K., 17 Cornwall Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-539 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] North America, U.S.A Houghton, Michigan Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-540 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] North America, U.S.A Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan, Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-541 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] North America, U.S.A Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan, Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu,
    [Show full text]
  • JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team
    Coasts and seas of the United Kingdom Region 11 The Western Approaches: Falmouth Bay to Kenfig edited by J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson, S.S. Kaznowska, J.P. Doody, N.C. Davidson & A.L. Buck Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House, City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY UK ©JNCC 1996 This volume has been produced by the Coastal Directories Project of the JNCC on behalf of the project Steering Group and supported by WWF-UK. JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team Project directors Dr J.P. Doody, Dr N.C. Davidson Project management and co-ordination J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson Editing and publication S.S. Kaznowska, J.C. Brooksbank, A.L. Buck Administration & editorial assistance C.A. Smith, R. Keddie, J. Plaza, S. Palasiuk, N.M. Stevenson The project receives guidance from a Steering Group which has more than 200 members. More detailed information and advice came from the members of the Core Steering Group, which is composed as follows: Dr J.M. Baxter Scottish Natural Heritage R.J. Bleakley Department of the Environment, Northern Ireland R. Bradley The Association of Sea Fisheries Committees of England and Wales Dr J.P. Doody Joint Nature Conservation Committee B. Empson Environment Agency Dr K. Hiscock Joint Nature Conservation Committee C. Gilbert Kent County Council & National Coasts and Estuaries Advisory Group Prof. S.J. Lockwood MAFF Directorate of Fisheries Research C.R. Macduff-Duncan Esso UK (on behalf of the UK Offshore Operators Association) Dr D.J. Murison Scottish Office Agriculture, Environment & Fisheries Department Dr H.J. Prosser Welsh Office Dr J.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing the Relationship Between Marine Transgression and Evolving Island Palaeogeography Using 3D GIS: an Example from the Late Triassic of SW England
    Downloaded from http://jgs.lyellcollection.org/ at University of Bristol Library on April 27, 2021 Research article Journal of the Geological Society https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2020-158 | Vol. 178 | 2021 | jgs2020-158 Testing the relationship between marine transgression and evolving island palaeogeography using 3D GIS: an example from the Late Triassic of SW England Jack Lovegrove1, Andrew J. Newell2, David I. Whiteside1,3 and Michael J. Benton1* 1 School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK 2 British Geological Survey, Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford OX10 8BB, UK 3 The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK DIW, 0000-0003-1619-747X; MJB, 0000-0002-4323-1824 * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The Rhaetian transgression marked a major change in landscape. The Permian and Triassic had been a time of terrestrial conditions across Europe, including much of mainland UK, as well as the North Sea and Irish Sea, represented by red bed clastic successions. Seas flooded across Europe at 205.7 Ma and the shift from terrestrial to marine environments is marked in the UK by the switch from the red beds of the Mercia Mudstone Group to the black mudstones and shelly limestones and sandstones of the Penarth Group. The area around Bristol was marked by a complex landscape in which an archipelago of islands of Carboniferous limestone was formed in the new shallow seas. The application of new methods in geographical information systems allows a detailed exploration of a number of conformable surfaces, the unconformity between the underlying Paleozoic rocks and the overlying Mesozoic strata, as well as levels within the latest Triassic sediments, marking the advance of the sea and interactions with the coeval tectonics, which caused some islands to rise and some basins to descend.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Report
    Integrated Impact Assessment of WECA Spatial Development Strategy Scoping Report November 2020 5200286 Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely as information for and use in relation to scoping the IIA of the WECA Spatial Development Strategy Atkins Limited assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. Document history Document title: IIA Scoping Report Document reference: 5200286 Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Rev 1.0 Working draft for comment/ PMcE/LUC AM CW AM October 2020 contextual understanding Rev 2.0 For Issue PMcE/LUC AM CW AM October 2020 Rev 3.0 For Consultation PMcE/LUC AM AM / CW AM November 2020 Client signoff Client West of England Combined Authority Project IIA of WECA Spatial Development Strategy Job number 5200286 Client signature/date 5200286 | 3 | November 2020 Atkins | WECA SDS Scoping Report v3.0 Page 2 of 59 Contents Chapter Page Glossary 5 1. Introduction 9 1.1. Purpose of this document 9 1.2. Scoping Report Consultation 9 2. West of England Spatial Development Strategy 11 2.1. West of England Combined Authorities 11 2.2. Spatial Development Strategy 11 2.3. The geographical area and timeframe to which the SDS applies 11 2.4. Relationship of SDS to Local Plans 13 3. Approach to the IIA 15 3.1. Introduction 15 3.2. IIA Methodology 15 4. Relevant Plans, Programmes and Environmental Protection Objectives 20 4.1. Environmental Themes 20 4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds in Avon – an Annotated Report
    Birds in Avon An annotated checklist A checklist of species in the Avon recording area with details of how their status has changed over time Expanded third edition, December 2020 This is the third edition of this checklist, now updated to the end of 2019, with extra detail, particularly of scarce species and pre 1950 records, and a number of corrections. I have removed most of the previous appendices, those relating to species not on the Avon list, and put them in a separate Supplement. I need to thank Rich Andrews for allowing me to use his line drawing to illustrate the latest text. I also need to thank a number of people for allowing me access to their reference material, in particular Nigel Milbourne for access to his archive of Somerset Bird reports back to 1924, Martyn Hayes for his input on the birds of south Glos, Harvey Rose and Andy Davis, and various others for helping clarify individual records. Richard Mielcarek December 2020 Species are divided between regular, scarce and rare and each is treated differently. Regular species Full details of these, and their recent local status, can be found in Bland and Dadds (2012) and there is no point in duplicating that information; instead, their status at five points in time is shown; 1874 – taken from Wheeler (1874) which covers the undefined ‘Bristol district’ (although it includes the estuaries of the rivers Avon and Severn, and Steep Holm) 1899 – taken from ‘The Birds of the Bristol District’, an article included in the 1899 BNS Proceedings. This defined the boundaries as follows;
    [Show full text]