Searching for Homeric Fandom in Greek Tragedy Lynn Kozak McGill University
[email protected] Abstract This article proposes an application of fan studies, and particularly a refined model of Suzanne Scott’s “fanboy auteur,” to reconsider Homeric creative response, with a spe- cial focus on the parodos of Euripides’s Iphigenia in Aulis. Keywords fandom – reception – epic – tragedy – affect Fan studies, and particularly the model of the fanboy auteur, can offer a new framework for thinking about Classical receptions of the Homeric poems and for Classical receptions more generally.* Fan studies combines several distinct issues that we wrestle with in Classics and Classical reception, including audi- ence response, intertextuality, metapoetics, authorship, and affect. While the means of production and cultural contexts of contemporary fandoms around twentieth- and twenty-first-century transmedia texts vastly diverge from those of the Athenian tragedians,1 a fan studies approach can still illuminate modes of engagement between authors and audiences around established texts like the Homeric epics. The term “fans” assumes some sort of an affective community (cf. Wilson 2016: 1.2): fans as individuals are emotionally invested in those things (includ- ing, but not limited to, storyworlds, characters, actors, auteurs, and texts) that * Many thanks to Jonathan Ready and Christos Tsagalis, to my anonymous reviewers for their bibliographic and conceptual suggestions, and to audiences at Greek Drama V at UBC in July 2017, who gave valuable feedback, particularly George Kovacs, whose work on Aristophanes as a Euripides fan dovetails with this work. Thanks also to Alex Martalogu for his close eye and his help with formatting.