DOCSLIB.ORG

The Future of Schubert Interpretation: What Is Really Needed? Author(S): Malcolm Bilson Reviewed Work(S): Source: Early Music, Vol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Future of Schubert Interpretation: What Is Really Needed? Author(S): Malcolm Bilson Reviewed Work(S): Source: Early Music, Vol The Future of Schubert Interpretation: What Is Really Needed? Author(s): Malcolm Bilson Reviewed work(s): Source: Early Music, Vol. 25, No. 4, 25th Anniversary Issue; Listening Practice (Nov., 1997), pp. 715-722 Published by: Oxford University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3128415 . Accessed: 01/12/2012 20:37 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Oxford University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Early Music. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.82.215 on Sat, 1 Dec 2012 20:37:16 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Observations Malcolm Bilson The futureof Schubertinterpretation: what is reallyneeded? URING the 1991Mozart Conferenceat Lincoln aries.' In an age when most mainstream perfor- Center in New York City1 a recording was mances are very far from the kind of creative,ima- played of Serge Rachmaninoffperforming the first ginative playing of which in the case of SergeRach- movement of Mozart's A major sonata, K331.2To maninoff we have direct witness and in the case of describe Rachmaninoff'sperformance as not heed- Wolfgang Mozart well-founded suppositions, such ing the text would be superfluous;it was so free in thinking can only be detrimental.Our principalgoal this regard that the penultimate Adagio variation should be to get into the passion and emotion of the was actuallyfaster than the Allegro that followed it. music as deeply and richly as possible. This is not This gave rise to a great deal of controversyamong merely a romantic notion; it is what every late 18th- the participants;there were those who were outraged and early19th-century treatise known to me stresses at the 'utter lack of respectfor the composer and the above all else (see below). To me the study of perfor- text', while others proclaimed,'But who today plays mance practice always promised More from the as flexiblyand gorgeouslyas Rachmaninoff?' greatestworks, not Less.The subjectof study is, to be Indeed, who does play the piano today as gor- sure, to ascertainjust what kind of More (i.e. the os- geously as Rachmaninoff, according to some the tensible differences between what Mozart would greatestpianist of his generation?Yet if Mozart,pos- have played and what we have from Rachmaninoff). sibly the greatest keyboard player of his day, had Montgomery's article addressestwo main issues: made a recording of that movement on his own the appropriateness(or lack thereof) of adding free Walter fortepiano, it would have been equally as ornamentationto Schubert'sinstrumental composi- wonderfulas Rachmaninoff's,equally as flexible,but tions, and the proper use of giving way in tempo, very different.My own goals as a pianist and musi- commonly called rubato. Montgomery admits that cian have alwaysbeen to glean as much information none of the tutors of Schubert'stime list him as one as I can from the pertinent sources, and then hope of the 'approved'composers for whom the particu- that I can transform that information into some- lar treatisemight be applicable,as Schubert'spublic thing as imaginativeand creativeas did Rachmani- publishing and performinglife was far too short to noff, albeit of a differentnature. make any impact until quite a few years after his Many aspects of David Montgomery's article death.Nevertheless,says Montgomery, by studying 'Modern Schubertinterpretation in the light of the as many treatises as possible from the period one pedagogicalsources of his day' in Earlymusic, xxv/1 should be able to arrive at some understandingof (Feb 1997)fill me with dismay.Such an articlerepre- general performance practices of the time, and sents a recent kind of performancepractice scholar- should thereforebe able to correlatethese to a par- ship that leads us in just the opposite direction from ticularcomposer living at that time and in that place. the one I think we should be taking.It says:'Find out I am in complete agreementwith this concept. what was permitted,and don't exceed those bound- The protagonist and apparent impetus for MalcolmBilson has beenfocusing on the Viennesefortepiano repertory for 30 years,and is currently recordingall the Schubertsonatas for Hungaroton. EARLY MUSIC NOVEMBER 1997 715 This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.82.215 on Sat, 1 Dec 2012 20:37:16 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Montgomery'sarticle is pianist RobertLevin, who in [Hethen quotes the 'most esteemed music director Ttlrk']... a recording of Schubert's A minor sonata, D537 Whoeverpresents a pieceof musicso thatthe affect [charac- in it is Vivarte, SK53364)introduced a few variants ter] accuratelyexpressed in everypassage, and where (Sony thetones are turned into a the of that and lead-ins. cites an earlierreview of 'languageof emotions', Montgomery manwe say,he hasa goodVortrag.8 this CD by Susan Kagan, who was so offended by Levin's accretions that she suggested that a WARN- Virtually every treatise known to me proffers a ING! label might well have been affixedto the cover similar First Rule. These invariably come before of the CD.3 Montgomery is equally affronted by those passages that instruct us on the proper use Levin'sfreedoms, and has taken the trouble to write of the bow, rendition of unmarked notes, tempo them out (occupying in all half a page). It must be rubato,etc. To put it in the simplestterms: the player pointed out that neither Susan Kagan nor David must be himself moved, and must be able, through Montgomery offer any precise critique of how and his art, to make manifest that which moves him what Levinactually plays; their common objectionis through his execution. The 'language of the emo- that he takes such libertiesat all!4 tions' is basic and central.9 Now, the PerformancePractice Movement is sup- But I was intrigued by the rather fascinating posedly interestedin 'how it was or might have been notion that WARNING! labels might be affixed to ideally'.Yet all over the world young musicians are CDs and concert programmes. To quote Susan being taught,from the best Urtext editions, the art of Kagan:'Perhaps the most importantissue here is the Thoushalt not: 'Thou shalt not departfrom the writ- obligation of Levin, in making such additions and ten text.' (Evenwhen we know from the treatisesand changes, to inform his audience. An unsuspecting other sources that this is precisely what was ex- listener who is not familiar with the original score pected.) 'Thou shalt observe stylistic differences.' cannot have the slightestidea that what he is hearing (Eventhough it is tabu to investigatewhat those dif- is not what Schubertcomposed. This recordneeds a ferencesmay have been.) WARNING! label ...,'o Most treatises of the time, Montgomery quotes me as saying: 'I believe that including those quoted by Montgomery,"1tell us, every measure of every piece in this repertoire with regard to such free extemporizing, that there (Schubert) has to be understood and interpreted.' should be very little of it and that it must be appro- Later on the same page: 'Robert Levin, Malcolm priateto the characterof the composition and intro- Bilson and Paul Badura-Skodaare not alone in the duced at the proper place. The most we get from opinion that Schubert'smusic requiresconsiderable Kaganis that Levin'sembellishments 'trivialize' the personal interpretation.'sNote that the word 'per- music; there are no specific critiques of particular sonal' has been added by Montgomery,but I gladly passages she considers awkwardor non-Schubert- take it on. I believe that personal interpretationis ian. In a 66- minute disc Levinhas some 20 seconds intrinsic to the First Rule of every treatise (in all of free ornamentation;is this the kind of 'excess'the following excerptsthe italics are mine): treatisesspeak out against? But if such WARNING! labels are indeed LeopoldMozart: One must take pains to discoverthe affect appro- intendedby the composer,and executeit correctly.Because priate, to what of kind of performancesmight they the sorrowfuloften alternates with the joyous,so one mustas- be applied? siduouslyendeavour to performeach accordingto its man- I recentlyheard on the radio a performanceof the ner. In a word, one must everythingin such a way that play SchubertB6 Piano Sonata, D960, by one of our lead- one is oneselfmoved by it.6 ing mainstreamperformers, on modern piano.This Ttirk:Whoever performs a composition so that the affect is a noted Schubert and Beethoven player, is most faith- pianist (character,etc.), even in everysingle passage, and his have interna- (made and thatthe tonesbecome recordings garnered many fullyexpressed perceptible) I listened and would venture at the sametime a languageof feelings, of this personit is said tional prizes. carefully, that he is a to that one bar of what he was cor- good executant.7 say hardly playing to what Schuberthad notated, Starke: Strong and weak, and all the different nuances, are responded carefully for our senses as the moon is for the tides of the sea. accordingto every late 18th- and early 19th-century 716 EARLY MUSIC NOVEMBER 1997 This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.82.215 on Sat, 1 Dec 2012 20:37:16 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions source known to me. LeopoldMozart and others tell of Mozart's specific performanceinstructions were us that all notes under a slur are to be played dimin- followed;everything was playedsmoothly and legato uendo, that is, gently tapering.Thisparticular pianist in a dynamic rangebetween piano and mezzo-piano; played every bar crescendo, as is the common mod- fulminating, bubbling, brilliant virtuosity was ern way, in order to promote the famous 'long line'.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Antonio Salieri's Revenge
    Antonio Salieri’s Revenge newyorker.com/magazine/2019/06/03/antonio-salieris-revenge By Alex Ross 1/13 Many composers are megalomaniacs or misanthropes. Salieri was neither. Illustration by Agostino Iacurci On a chilly, wet day in late November, I visited the Central Cemetery, in Vienna, where 2/13 several of the most familiar figures in musical history lie buried. In a musicians’ grove at the heart of the complex, Beethoven, Schubert, and Brahms rest in close proximity, with a monument to Mozart standing nearby. According to statistics compiled by the Web site Bachtrack, works by those four gentlemen appear in roughly a third of concerts presented around the world in a typical year. Beethoven, whose two-hundred-and-fiftieth birthday arrives next year, will supply a fifth of Carnegie Hall’s 2019-20 season. When I entered the cemetery, I turned left, disregarding Beethoven and company. Along the perimeter wall, I passed an array of lesser-known but not uninteresting figures: Simon Sechter, who gave a counterpoint lesson to Schubert; Theodor Puschmann, an alienist best remembered for having accused Wagner of being an erotomaniac; Carl Czerny, the composer of piano exercises that have tortured generations of students; and Eusebius Mandyczewski, a magnificently named colleague of Brahms. Amid these miscellaneous worthies, resting beneath a noble but unpretentious obelisk, is the composer Antonio Salieri, Kapellmeister to the emperor of Austria. I had brought a rose, thinking that the grave might be a neglected and cheerless place. Salieri is one of history’s all-time losers—a bystander run over by a Mack truck of malicious gossip.
    [Show full text]
  • Leopold and Wolfgang Mozart's View of the World
    Between Aufklärung and Sturm und Drang: Leopold and Wolfgang Mozart’s View of the World by Thomas McPharlin Ford B. Arts (Hons.) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy European Studies – School of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Adelaide July 2010 i Between Aufklärung and Sturm und Drang: Leopold and Wolfgang Mozart’s View of the World. Preface vii Introduction 1 Chapter 1: Leopold Mozart, 1719–1756: The Making of an Enlightened Father 10 1.1: Leopold’s education. 11 1.2: Leopold’s model of education. 17 1.3: Leopold, Gellert, Gottsched and Günther. 24 1.4: Leopold and his Versuch. 32 Chapter 2: The Mozarts’ Taste: Leopold’s and Wolfgang’s aesthetic perception of their world. 39 2.1: Leopold’s and Wolfgang’s general aesthetic outlook. 40 2.2: Leopold and the aesthetics in his Versuch. 49 2.3: Leopold’s and Wolfgang’s musical aesthetics. 53 2.4: Leopold’s and Wolfgang’s opera aesthetics. 56 Chapter 3: Leopold and Wolfgang, 1756–1778: The education of a Wunderkind. 64 3.1: The Grand Tour. 65 3.2: Tour of Vienna. 82 3.3: Tour of Italy. 89 3.4: Leopold and Wolfgang on Wieland. 96 Chapter 4: Leopold and Wolfgang, 1778–1781: Sturm und Drang and the demise of the Mozarts’ relationship. 106 4.1: Wolfgang’s Paris journey without Leopold. 110 4.2: Maria Anna Mozart’s death. 122 4.3: Wolfgang’s relations with the Weber family. 129 4.4: Wolfgang’s break with Salzburg patronage.
    [Show full text]
  • Leopold Mozart, the Rationalist? Humanism and Good Taste in Eighteenth-Century Musical Thought Katherine H
    Yale Journal of Music & Religion Volume 3 | Number 2 Article 4 2017 Leopold Mozart, the Rationalist? Humanism and Good Taste in Eighteenth-Century Musical Thought Katherine H. Walker Hobart and William Smith Colleges Follow this and additional works at: http://elischolar.library.yale.edu/yjmr Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Walker, Katherine H. (2017) "Leopold Mozart, the Rationalist? Humanism and Good Taste in Eighteenth-Century Musical Thought," Yale Journal of Music & Religion: Vol. 3: No. 2, Article 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17132/2377-231X.1084 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale. It has been accepted for inclusion in Yale Journal of Music & Religion by an authorized editor of EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Leopold Mozart the prolific voices of the pre-Kantian rationalistic Enlightenment, provides undeniable evidence Rationalist? of secularization. Nonetheless, as recent his- Humanism and Good Taste in toriographies have shown, the assumption that the Philosophes’ writings reflect the broader Eighteenth-Century Musical intellectual climate of the Enlightenment is Thought simply not supported by evidence.3 Notwith- Katherine Walker standing the tenor of those writings, the Enlightenment was, it turns out, deeply and Twenty years after Dale Van Kley’s The broadly informed by religion. Religious Origins of the French Revolution, which The religious turn in eighteenth-century situated Catholic theology, in general, and studies has created opportunities to revisit and Jansenist-related controversies, in specific, at refine some of our most entrenched narratives the heart of French Revolutionary politics, it is about this period in history.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Chapter
    WOLFGANG GOES A.W.O.L Leopold Mozart knew there was going to be trouble when his young son, Wolfgang, ten years old at the time, threw a tantrum just before a performance at Baron Somebody or Other’s castle. Wolfgang jumped up and down and ranted, “I’m NOT going to play that dumb Scarlatti sonata one more time! I’m NOT going to wear this silly silk suit anymore, and I’m NOT going to be chucked under the chin by fat old ladies with bad breath wearing forty kilos of brocade!!” Patiently, Leopold let the temper run its course, and after informing his son that his behavior was putting his weekly allowance of kronen at risk, the performance went on as planned. That, of course, was not to be the end of the story. Several days later Wolfgang sat at the harpsichord dutifully practicing his scales and exercises (slipping in a cadenza here and there to break the monotony). A window next to the harpsichord looked down into the Strasse below, and he glanced wistfully at the comings and goings of a busy Salzburg. He particularly liked the fine black carriages pulled by magnificent teams of horses that carried the gentry about their daily business. Wolfgang was overcome by a great longing. Like all boys his age he was preoccupied with the idea of obtaining his beginning carriage driver’s permit so that he too could enjoy the freedom of the streets. If he quietly put aside a few kronen a week from his allowance, he might be able to pay for carriage driving lessons.
    [Show full text]
  • DUEPPEN-DISSERTATION-2012.Pdf (2.279Mb)
    © Copyright by Timothy M. Dueppen December 2012 THE TROMBONE AS SACRED SIGNIFIER IN THE OPERAS OF WOLFGANG AMADEUS MOZART _______________ A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Moores School of Music University of Houston _______________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Musical Arts _______________ By Timothy M. Dueppen December 2012 THE TROMBONE AS SACRED SIGNIFIER IN THE OPERAS OF WOLFGANG AMADEUS MOZART ____________________________________ Timothy M. Dueppen APPROVED: ____________________________________ Jeffrey Sposato, Ph.D. Committee Chair ____________________________________ Andrew Davis, Ph.D. ____________________________________ Noe Marmolejo ____________________________________ Brian Kauk ____________________________________ John W. Roberts, Ph.D. Dean, College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences Department of English ii THE TROMBONE AS SACRED SIGNIFIER IN THE OPERAS OF WOLFGANG AMADEUS MOZART _______________ An Abstract of a Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Moores School of Music University of Houston _______________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Musical Arts _______________ By Timothy M. Dueppen December 2012 iii Abstract The Trombone as Sacred Signifier in the Operas of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Timothy M. Dueppen The trombone was understood during the eighteenth century and earlier in Germany as an instrument with important sacred significance. This association developed because of its appearance in German translations of the Bible by Martin Luther and Catholic theologians and its presence in encyclopedias and treatises of the period. This, along with the trombone’s vast use in church music of the period, helped it to be understood as an instrument of sacred significance by the German musical public. It was this social understanding of the sacerdotal qualities of the trombone that propelled Mozart to use the instrument in his operas Idomeneo, Don Giovanni, and Die Zauberflöte to enhance some of the most important sacred elements of each work.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756-1791) String Quartet in a Major, K. 464
    Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756-1791) String Quartet in A major, K. 464 - Allegro Menuetto-Trio Andante Allegro non troppo This A major quartet is one of the six quartets that Mozart dedicated to Haydn and which are the result of a wonderfully productive interaction between the two composers. In the course of the five years from 1768 to 1772, his 40th year, Haydn published three sets of quartets the Op 9, 17 and 20, in which the older Divertimento form evolved into the true classical string quartet with free and independent parts among the four instruments. The following year, 1773, the 21-year old Mozart wrote a set of six quartets, his so-called Viennese quartets (K. 169 – 173, now little performed), which incorporated many of the features and even some of the themes of Haydn’s works. But then, curiously, neither composer produced another quartet for 10 years. Eventually, in 1782 Haydn announced his set of six Op 33 quartets and they fired up Mozart, so that between 1782 and 1785 he worked unusually hard at his own set of six quartets. These “six sons... the fruit of a long and laborious study” he dedicated to “his very dear friend” Haydn. Haydn in turn after hearing the last three of these quartets said to Leopold, Mozart’s father, “I say to you before God, on my word of honour, your son is the greatest composer whom I know personally or by name; he has taste and the greatest skill in composition as well”. The A major quartet is one of these latter three, all of which benefit from the learning process that Mozart had gone through with the first three.
    [Show full text]
  • PROGRAM NOTES Wolfgang Mozart – Piano Concerto No. 18 in B-Flat
    PROGRAM NOTES Wolfgang Mozart – Piano Concerto No. 18 in B-flat Major, K. 456 Wolfgang Mozart Born January 27, 1756, Salzburg, Austria. Died December 5, 1791, Vienna, Austria. Piano Concerto No. 18 in B-flat Major, K. 456 In 1785, Leopold Mozart spent ten weeks in Vienna visiting his son. It is clear from his letters home to Nannerl, Wolfgang’s sister, that he was thrilled by it all, enjoyed being introduced around town as Wolfgang’s father, and felt relief, mingled with surprise, to see that his son had made a success of it without him. Leopold arrived on February 11, just in time for a bitter cold snap that lasted till the first of March, leaving the streets piled with snow and several people dead of frostbite. Leopold soon saw that his son’s life in Vienna was a whirlwind of public appearances. “Since my arrival,” he later wrote to Nannerl, “your brother’s fortepiano has been taken at least a dozen times from the house to the theater or to some other house.” The night Leopold arrived, Friday the eleventh, he heard Wolfgang play the great D minor piano concerto for the first time; the next evening he listened to Wolfgang’s three new string quartets, and with even greater delight to the famous remark Joseph Haydn made that night: “Before God, and as an honest man, I tell you that your son is the greatest composer known to me in person or by name.” And this was only Saturday. On Sunday, February 13, Wolfgang played “a masterful concerto that he wrote for Paradis.
    [Show full text]
  • Janser- Thesis
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE SCHOOL OF MUSIC A FATHER’S ROLE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPOSITIONAL TECHNIQUE: A STUDY OF TWO CONCERTOS EMILY JANSER Spring 2011 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Music Education with honors in Music Reviewed and approved* by the following: Marie Sumner Lott Assistant Professor, Musicology Thesis Supervisor Joanne Rutkowski Professor, Music Education Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. Abstract This thesis investigates paternal influence in the compositional techniques of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756-1791) and Richard Strauss (1864-1949). Although the two composers lived a century apart, similarities in their relationship with their fathers, Leopold Mozart and Franz Strauss are apparent. In Part One, research demonstrates paternal involvement in both composers’ upbringing and education. Part Two of this thesis will analyze two concertos, one by each composer: Wolfgang Mozart’s Violin Concerto No. 1 in B-flat Major, K. 207 (1773) and Richard Strauss’s Horn Concerto No. 1 in E-flat Major, Op. 11 (1883). In each concerto, similarities between the compositional techniques of the composer and his respective father show the extent of paternal influence in composition. Finally, comparisons examine the similarities and differences between the two father-son relationships. Through the investigation of these relationships, we may acquire a clearer understanding of their music, making performance
    [Show full text]
  • Music Manuscripts and Books Checklist
    THE MORGAN LIBRARY & MUSEUM MASTERWORKS FROM THE MORGAN: MUSIC MANUSCRIPTS AND BOOKS The Morgan Library & Museum’s collection of autograph music manuscripts is unequaled in diversity and quality in this country. The Morgan’s most recent collection, it is founded on two major gifts: the collection of Mary Flagler Cary in 1968 and that of Dannie and Hettie Heineman in 1977. The manuscripts are strongest in music of the eighteenth, nineteenth, and early twentieth centuries. Also, the Morgan has recently agreed to purchase the James Fuld collection, by all accounts the finest private collection of printed music in the world. The collection comprises thousands of first editions of works— American and European, classical, popular, and folk—from the eighteenth century to the present. The composers represented in this exhibition range from Johann Sebastian Bach to John Cage. The manuscripts were chosen to show the diversity and depth of the Morgan’s music collection, with a special emphasis on several genres: opera, orchestral music and concerti, chamber music, keyboard music, and songs and choral music. Recordings of selected works can be heard at music listening stations. Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756–1791) Der Schauspieldirektor, K. 486. Autograph manuscript of the full score (1786). Cary 331. The Mary Flagler Cary Music Collection. Mozart composed this delightful one-act Singspiel—a German opera with spoken dialogue—for a royal evening of entertainment presented by Emperor Joseph II at Schönbrunn, the royal summer residence just outside Vienna. It took the composer a little over two weeks to complete Der Schauspieldirektor (The Impresario). The slender plot concerns an impresario’s frustrated attempts to assemble the cast for an opera.
    [Show full text]
  • Mozart Biography
    Mozart Cliff Eisen According to a possibly apocryphal story, when the conductor Otto Klemperer was asked to list his favourite composers, Mozart was not among them. On being taxed with his, Klemperer is said to have replied, 'Oh, I thought you meant the others'. This anecdote illustrates how Mozart is often regarded, almost as a matter of course: as a pre-eminent (some would say 'the' pre-eminent) composer of operas, concertos, symphonies and chamber music.[1] His life and works can conveniently be divided into three distinct periods: 1756- 1773 when, as a child prodigy, he toured much of Western Europe and composed his first works; 1773-1780, when he was largely based in Salzburg in the employ of the Salzburg court (with a significant interruption from September 1777 to January 1779, when he quit service in search of a position at either Mannheim or Paris); and 1781-1791, when he was permanently resident in Vienna and during which time he composed the works for which he is best remembered. Most Mozart biographers see in this three-fold division a pattern that, even if its dates do not exactly correspond with the traditional, Rousseauian model of a creative life - apprenticeship (which for Mozart is said to extend from 1763 to the late 1770s), maturity (the late 1770s to about 1788), and decline (about 1788-1791) - is nevertheless more or less consistent with how other composers' lives, including Palestrina, Beethoven and Rossini, are usually represented. The one significant difference, perhaps, is that Mozart's alleged decline is 'redeemed' by the composition, in his final year, of two transcendent works: the sacred Requiem and the secular The Magic Flute.
    [Show full text]
  • MOZART – a SHORT BIOGRAPHY YOUNG MOZART WAYS Mozart
    YOUNG MOZART WAYS European level through meetings, competitions, travels to MOZART – A SHORT BIOGRAPHY Court Chapel. First Italian journey of father and son to Milan 1782 Premiere of the singspiel The Abduction from the Seraglio; other partner cities along the Mozart Ways. Not only does with numerous excursions to other towns. Commission to com- Mozart marries Constanze Weber, Aloysia’s sister. this channel effectively assist in spreading knowledge about pose the first Milanese opera Mitridate, Re di Ponto. Admission Young Mozart Ways Mozart, but it also disseminates the positive resonance of 1756 Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart is born on January 27 in to the Accademia Filarmonica di Bologna (Padre Martini) and 1783 Last stay of Wolfgang (together with Constanze) in Salz- On the way to & with Mozart Mozart’s music, individually and collectively, in the direct Salzburg. He is the seventh child of Anna Maria (née Pertl awarding of the Order of the Golden Spur in Rome by the burg. Mozart’s first son Raimund Leopold lives only two months. In the field of music education and pedagogy, projects have experience of performance. 1720-1778) from St. Gilgen and Leopold Mozart (1719-1787) Pope. Second journey to Italy. Second opera commission for On the way back to Vienna, he writes the Linz Symphony “head been developed under the heading “Young Mozart Ways”. from Augsburg. Five of their children die, only Wolfgang Milan, Ascanio in Alba. over heels”. Their aim is to inspire the younger generations in the discov- • Choir “Amadeo” Salzburg, Austria and his older sister Maria Anna (1751-1829), called Nannerl, 1784-1785 Mozart starts to keep a catalogue of all his works; ery of Mozart’s life and work as well as his pioneering Euro- • Boys’ Choir “Les Pastoureaux”, Waterloo, Belgium survive.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spoken Text CD 1 1 Leopold Mozart: Sinfonia Di Caccia No
    The Spoken Text CD 1 1 Leopold Mozart: Sinfonia di caccia No, there's nothing wrong, either with your equipment or your ears (those barking dogs are part of the score); and no, that music isn't by Mozart. By a Mozart, yes; but if he hadn't been the father of the Mozart, the chances are that most of us would never have heard of him. And though he was a man with a high opinion of himself, that wouldn't have surprised him in the least. He never expected immortality. Leopold Mozart was an intelligent and cultured man, a very respectable composer, a fine violinist, and the author of an influential treatise on playing the violin. For a musician of his time – middle of the eighteenth century – he was exceptionally well educated. Headed originally for the priesthood, he studied logic and jurisprudence at the University of Salzburg in Austria, and it was there that he spent the whole of his professional life as a court and church musician in the service of the Prince-Archbishop. Well I say 'all' of it – in fact there were some years that he spent away from the court, carting his two prodigiously gifted children around Europe, and making a pot of money in the process. His daughter Maria Anna was a child virtuoso on the harpsichord and fortepiano , and an excellent singer, and his son Wolfgang was quite simply the most staggering prodigy in the history of music. At the age of three he was picking out pleasing combinations of notes on the harpsichord, and by the time he was four he could already play a number of short pieces from memory – and faultlessly.
    [Show full text]