DOCSLIB.ORG

Canon Law Society of America Proceedings of the Sixty-Third

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Canon Law Society of America Proceedings of the Sixty-Third CANON LAW SOCIETY OF AMERICA PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTY-THIRD ANNUAL CONVENTION ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO OCTOBER 8-11,2001 ©Copyright 2001 by Canon Law Society of America ISBN 0-943616-91-3 SAN 237-6296 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner without permission of the copyright holder, except for brief quotations in critical reviews and articles. Printed in the United States of America Canon Law Society of America The Catholic University of America Caldwell Hall, 431 Washington, D.C. 20064 TABLE OF CONTENTS ADDRESSES One Church, Many Cultures Rev. Drew Christiansen S.J. 1 Many Peoples Living in One Church Most Rev. Donald Pelotte, S.S.S. 11 Law in the Service of Church in America Very Rev. John A. Renken 17 SEMINARS Canonical Issues in Due Process Rev. Thomas T. Brundage 37 Bishops and the Apostolates of Religious Rev. James J. Conn, S.J. 49 Pastoral Care of Migrants and The Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches Chorbishop John D. Faris 85 Error Rev. Msgr. James Graham 101 Use of the Computer and Internet Resources for Canon Law Rev. PaulHartmann Ill Ministry to the Sick and Dying in view of the Shortage of Priests Rev. John Huels, O.S.M. 127 Elements of a Judicial Sentence Rev. John G. Johnson 147 Communicatio in Sacris: An Effort to Express the Unity of Christians or Simply an Exercise in Politeness? Rev. Aidan McGrath, O.F.M. 173 Canonical Ministry to Migrants Most Rev. Ricardo Ramirez, C.S.B 215 Sr. Catherine Darcy, R.S.M. Anointing of the Sick - Theological Issues Sr. Susan K. Woods, S.C.L 233 in OFFICERS' REPORTS President Rev. Msgr. Robert P. Deeley 255 Treasurer Sr. Margaret Stallmeyer, C.D.P. 261 Auditors' Report 262 Budget FY 2001-2001 279 Executive Coordinator Rev. Arthur J. Espelage, O.F.M. 287 COMMITTEE REPORTS CONSTITUTIONAL COMMITTEES Budget 299 Convention Planning 299 Nominations 303 Professional Responsibility 305 Resolutions 305 ON-GOING COMMITTEES Advisory Opinions • 307 American Jurisprudence 309 Canon Law Digest 310 Civil and Canon Law 310 Electronic Media 312 Investment Review 313 Marriage Research 314 Publications Committee 315 Roman Replies 317 Scholarship Fund 318 Translation of Legislative Texts 320 PROJECTS Annotated Bibliography 321 Canonical Advocacy Study 321 Eastern Canon Law 322 Ex Corde Ecclesiae Application 323 Festschrift in Honor of Lawrence Wrenn 324 Parish Life Handbook 325 Parish Viability 325 iv Revisions of the English Translation of the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches 326 Rome 2005 Convention Committee 327 Selection of Bishops 327 CONVENTION General Convention 328 Convention Liturgies 328 Tribunal Statistics 2000 331 BUSINESS MEETING Minutes 345 MISCELLANEOUS Homily Most Rev. Michael J. Sheehan 363 Citation for the Role of Law Award Rev. Msgr. Robert P. Deeley 365 Response, Role of Law Award Rev. Ellsworth Kneal 367 Contributors : 371 FORWARD The Canon Law Society of America annually publishes CLSA Proceedings to members and others in the canonical community from the major addresses and seminars presented at the annual convention. The request consistently existed over the years that publication take place as soon as possible after the convention. The proceedings of the sixty-third annual convention, October 8-11, 2001 at Albuquerque, New Mexico represent an attempt to meet that request. In the collection of materials for this manuscript, I wish to express my gratitude to the presenters who provided their final texts in a most timely fashion. Each of the presenters in this volume of CLSA Proceedings performs many tasks in their day to day ministry in the Church; their contributions represent both their mastery of the material and skill in presenting their topic as well as a commitment to make their presentations available in written form. Preparation of the texts for publication was facilitated this year by the submission of electronic versions of the presentations. In the preparation of texts, every attempt was made to maintain consistency by relying on both The Chicago Manual of Style and the style of previous issues of CLSA Proceedings. Those who attended the Albuquerque convention will notice two seminar omissions in the written proceedings. Due to circumstances beyond CLSA control, the final text of "The Role of Canon Law and Civil Law in the Protection of Ecclesiastical Goods of Catholic Institutes" by Sr. Melanie DiPietro, SC will not be available until the Summer of 2002. The Reverend Michael P. Hilbert, SJ. choose not to submit a manuscript for his seminar "Recent Developments in Rotal Jurisprudence." I wish to also express my gratitude to Joy Harrell, project assistant at the Office of the Executive Coordinator who collated, formatted, and prepared the camera ready text of this year's proceedings. CLSA Proceedings 63 (2001) becomes an additional professional resource offered by the Canon Law Society of America. The text contains a high degree of consistency and accuracy which further scholarly research would confirm in individual instances. Additional copies of this volume may be found at CLSA PUBLICATIONS, P.O. Box 463, Annapolis Junction, MD 20701-0463. Arthur J. Espelage, O.F.M. Office of the Executive Coordinator Canon Law Society of America Washington, DC 20064 CLSA PROCEEDINGS 63 (2001) 1-10 ONE CHURCH, MANY CULTURES REV. DREW CHRISTIANSEN, S.J. My thanks for that welcome, and to Art Espelage who made the contact, and to Ann Rehrauer, who put in the first telephone call. As you know, Gus DiNoia and I are in a way exchanging positions. He is in the role of 'expert' now, laboring in Rome, and I am in his place giving the keynote because I was an expert at the Synod of America. Being a peritus for a synod is rather like being a graduate student. Most of the experts are there taking notes on specified themes during the various presentations of the bishops and auditors to help prepare the first document that goes out to the members of synod attempting to delineate the lines of thinking that have been developing during the first week or so of presentations. In my case I also found myself pressed into unexpected service to do a fair amount of translation. I protested that the language I had indicated as my second language was French, not Spanish. Archbishop George, one of the secretaries of the synod replied, "Someone's decided you're going to be a translator. You are translating." So my weekends were given to translating, and just as I began to breathe a sigh of relief that I might get an afternoon off, I was seconded to the message committee to assist in their work. The only advantage to that was that the person who recruited me was Dennis Schnurr, then our general secretary, now the bishop of Dulufh, and Dennis said to me, "Drew, as long as you're willing to do some drafting, I will do all the typing, all the copying, anything that needs to be done." So, for that week or so that we did the message, the general secretary was my assistant. I hope that all of you will join in the discussion later. I do not come here with canonical expertise. I do no have even a sophisticated understanding of the theology of Koinonia which Gus DiNoia might have had in relation to some of the deeper issues of ecclesiology. But I do bring a firsthand experience of the synod and I hope that will help fill in some of the background, of the dynamics, and of unresolved questions that still stand before all the Church in America. I have to say, too, that I come here with a bit of trepidation. I am used to questioning foreign ministers in my work for the bishops, meeting with presidents, and occasionally receiving a demarche from a minister of religion, but it puts me a little on my guard that I am addressing five hundred canonists. So I hope you'll be understanding. 1 Introductory: A Question of Geography In the beginning, and actually for some time on, there was a question, particularly among the English-speakers: Why is this the Synod for America! Our English language, and especially our American usage, talks of the Americas, not of America in the singular. Richard Neuhaus, in his book Appointment in Rome, which is a memoir of his time with us at the Synod, recalls running into my Jesuit brother, Tom Reese, who as you know has a slightly jaundiced view of some things, having written a book called Inside the Vatican. When asked about the synod's title, Tom quipped, "Well, they're just using old atlases in the Vatican." As I learned later, as we worked with the experts and later with the message committee, the English language really has a different geography than the Romance languages. The French, and especially the Spanish, speak of one continent. What we call 'the Hemisphere,', they call El Continente. And when you try to talk about hemisphere, they say, "No, no, no. There's only east-west; there's no north-south" in terms of hemispheres. And so eventually the Anglicophones had to yield, and say, "Okay, we talk about America, plain and simple." In Ecclesia America, no.5, the Holy Father wrote, "On the threshold of third Christian millennium, and at a time when ideological barriers have fallen, the Church feels absolutely duty-bound to bring into still deeper spiritual union the peoples who compose this great continent, and also to stir among these people a spirit of solidarity." He continues, "The decision to speak of America in the singular was an attempt to speak not only of the unity which is in some way already existent, but also to point to the closer bond which the peoples of the continent seek and which the Church fosters as part of her own mission." The Holy Father then looked back to the 1992 general meeting of CELAM, at the time of the quincentennial, when he first proposed a single meeting to address, as he said, "Problems relating to justice and solidarity among all the nations of America." Later, in Tertio Millennium Adveniente, he called for a new evangelization, and went on to call for a discussion on issues of justice and of international economic relations in view of the enormous gap between north and south.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Centrality of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass at Christendom College
    THE CENTRALITY OF THE HOLY SACRIFICE OF THE MASS AT CHRISTENDOM COLLEGE The Church teaches that the Eucharist is “the source and summit of the Christian life”1 and that the celebration of the Mass “is a sacred action surpassing all others. No other action of the Church can equal its efficacy.”2 That is why “as a natural expression of the Catholic identity of the University. members of this community . will be encouraged to participate in the celebration of the sacraments, especially the Eucharist, as the most perfect act of community worship.”3 Those central truths are taught and lived at Christendom College, a “Catholic coeducational college institutionally committed to the Magisterium”4 of the Church, in the following ways: The Celebration of the Sacred Liturgy The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass • Mass is offered frequently: twice daily Monday through Thursday, three times on MONDAY (Friday), twice on Saturday, and once on Sunday (the day on which we gather as one family). • Mass in the Roman Rite is celebrated in all the ways offered by the Church: in the Ordinary Form in both English and Latin, and in the Extraordinary Form from one to three times per week, as circumstances permit. • The Ordinary Form of the Mass is celebrated with the solemnity appropriate to each feast, utilizing worthy sacred vessels and vestments, and drawing upon the Church’s rich tradition of chant, polyphony, and hymnody. • The Ordinary Form of the Mass is celebrated reverently and with rubrical fidelity. • No classes or other activities are scheduled during Mass times. • The majority of the College community attends daily Mass regularly and with great devotion.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolutions to Censure the President: Procedure and History
    Resolutions to Censure the President: Procedure and History Updated February 1, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45087 Resolutions to Censure the President: Procedure and History Summary Censure is a reprimand adopted by one or both chambers of Congress against a Member of Congress, President, federal judge, or other government official. While Member censure is a disciplinary measure that is sanctioned by the Constitution (Article 1, Section 5), non-Member censure is not. Rather, it is a formal expression or “sense of” one or both houses of Congress. Censure resolutions targeting non-Members have utilized a range of statements to highlight conduct deemed by the resolutions’ sponsors to be inappropriate or unauthorized. Before the Nixon Administration, such resolutions included variations of the words or phrases unconstitutional, usurpation, reproof, and abuse of power. Beginning in 1972, the most clearly “censorious” resolutions have contained the word censure in the text. Resolutions attempting to censure the President are usually simple resolutions. These resolutions are not privileged for consideration in the House or Senate. They are, instead, considered under the regular parliamentary mechanisms used to process “sense of” legislation. Since 1800, Members of the House and Senate have introduced resolutions of censure against at least 12 sitting Presidents. Two additional Presidents received criticism via alternative means (a House committee report and an amendment to a resolution). The clearest instance of a successful presidential censure is Andrew Jackson. The Senate approved a resolution of censure in 1834. On three other occasions, critical resolutions were adopted, but their final language, as amended, obscured the original intention to censure the President.
    [Show full text]
  • 1700 Faculties
    Book IV The Sanctifying Office of the Church Part I Sacramental Life §1700 FACULTIES The following faculties or permissions apply to all priests who are in good standing and who are incardinated in the Diocese or who have been approved by the Bishop to minister within the Diocese, even if they may be retired. In a spirit of trust and in keeping with the principle of subsidiarity, every effort has been made to extend the discretionary authority of priests in the exercise of their ministry. Whatever special faculties or permissions have been given to pastors apply also to parochial administrators (c. 540, §1). These faculties and permissions are effective August 15, 1986 and remain in effect until revoked. Special Note The information contained in this section is, in many cases, repetitious of that in previous sections and has been included here for purposes of quick reference. Users are encouraged to consult specific sections for a more complete statement of Diocesan Policy and Procedures regarding sacramental matters. §1701 BAPTISM1 1701.1. Faculty To baptize those who are fourteen years of age or older. Procedures a) Canon 862 provides that outside the case of necessity, it is not lawful to confer baptism in the territory of another without permission. b) Without this faculty it would be necessary to refer such cases to the diocesan bishop (c. 863). c) As a rule, an adult is to be baptized in his or her own parish church (c. 857, §2). d) The sacrament of baptism is not to be conferred outside a legitimate canonically erected parish church or chapel, except in the case of necessity (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Pope Names Bishop Kevin Vann to Orange, California; Accepts Resignations of Bishops of Orange, Rochester, N.Y.; Names Apostolic Administrator for Rochester
    POPE NAMES BISHOP KEVIN VANN TO ORANGE, CALIFORNIA; ACCEPTS RESIGNATIONS OF BISHOPS OF ORANGE, ROCHESTER, N.Y.; NAMES APOSTOLIC ADMINISTRATOR FOR ROCHESTER WASHINGTON—Pope Benedict XVI has named Bishop Kevin W. Vann of Fort Worth, Texas, 61, to be bishop of Orange, California, and accepted the resignation of Bishop Tod D. Brown, 75, from the pastoral government of the diocese. The pope also accepted the resignation of Bishop Matthew H. Clark of Rochester, New York, 75, from the pastoral governance of the Rochester diocese and named Bishop Robert J. Cunningham of Syracuse, New York, 69, as apostolic administrator of the Rochester diocese until the appointment and installation of a new bishop there. The appointments were publicized in Washington September 21, by Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, apostolic nuncio to the United States. Kevin Vann was born May 10, 1951, in Springfield, Illinois and was ordained a priest for the diocese of Springfield in 1981. He earned a doctorate in canon law in 1985 from the Pontifical University of St. Thomas (Angelicum) in Rome. In the Springfield Diocese he served as associate pastor, pastor, and on the staff of the diocesan tribunal. In 2005, he was named coadjutor bishop of Fort Worth, Texas, to succeed Bishop Joseph Delaney, who died one day before Bishop-designate Vann was ordained bishop. Bishop Brown, a native of San Francisco, was ordained priest of the Diocese of Monterey-Fresno, California, in 1962. He was named bishop of Boise, Idaho in 1988, and Bishop of Orange in 1998. Bishop Clark, a native of Troy, New York, was ordained a priest of the Diocese of Albany, New York, in 1962.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Philip Benizi Catholic Church 235 South Pine Drive, Fullerton, CA 92833 Tel
    St. Philip Benizi Catholic Church 235 South Pine Drive, Fullerton, CA 92833 Tel. (714)871-3610 FAX (714) 871-5827 e-mail: [email protected] www.benizi.us I rejoiced when they said to me, “Let us go to the house of the LORD” -- Psalm 122:1 June 6, 2020 Dear Brothers and Sisters in the Lord, On Friday, May 22, the Diocese of Orange announced that “public masses can begin in Orange County on the solemnity of Corpus Christi, Sunday, June 14 in a phased-in approach with measures in place to safeguard public health.” Since then the Diocese has informed us that it fully intends to respect the State of California’s COVID-19 Industry Guidance for Places of Worship released on May 25th. The most significant of its restrictions is that “Places of worship must limit attendance to 25% of building capacity or a maximum of 100 attendees, whichever is lower. This limitation will be in effect for the first 21-days of a county public health department’s approval of religious services … at places of worship within their jurisdictions.”.” In subsequent weekly meetings with the Pastors and Business Managers of the Parishes of the Diocese, our Bishop, Most Rev. Kevin Vann, has made it abundantly clear that his over-riding interest is in protecting the Common Good, that is, in the health and welfare of our parishioners, especially “the weakest among us,” our Seniors and those with underlying health conditions. Further, Bishop Vann has made it clear that he is not being guided by politics of any kind, but rather and above all by the medical experts at the world-class St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Subjective Element of Crime: a Comparison Between Ecclesiastical, and Belgian Criminal Law
    The Subjective Element of Crime: a Comparison between Ecclesiastical, and Belgian Criminal Law Word count: 36,697 Raphael Maesschalck Student number: 01204319 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Jan Verplaetse Co-supervisor: Prof. Dr. Tom Vander Beken A dissertation submitted to Ghent University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Laws Academic year: 2017 - 2018 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS — DUTCH Een woord van dank gaat uit naar: - Mijn promotor, Prof. dr. Jan Verplaetse, wiens ideeën mij lieten durven denken, voor het interessante onderwerp; - Dr. William Richardson, voor het aanreiken van een literatuurlijst, het beantwoorden van mijn (vele) chaotische vragen en het ter beschikking stellen van verhelderende inzichten tijdens onze gesprekken; - Prof. em. dr. Ruud Huysmans, voor het delen zijn expertise en visie en de tijd die hij daarvoor vrijmaakte; - Mr. Eric De Wilde, voor het mij wegwijs maken in het doolhof van de bijzondere faculteit kerkelijk recht te Leuven en het gebruikelijke kopje koffie; - Mr. Philippe Tobback, niet alleen voor het ter beschikking stellen van een geairconditioneerde werkplaats in de moordende zomerhitte, maar vooral voor alle steun en hulp die mij steeds opnieuw werd aangeboden; - Dr. Nigel Coles, mr. Martin Jones en mr. Nils Van Damme, voor het nalezen dit werk; - Mijn vader, voor de economische en morele steun; - En tenslotte mijn moeder, voor veel meer dan dat wat een louter dankwoord verdient. !2 !3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS — DUTCH____________________________________ 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS______________________________________________ 4 GENERAL INTRODUCTION___________________________________________ 7 CHAPTER I: Introduction to the Legal and Institutional Frameworks____________ 9 1 The Church and Ecclesiastical Criminal Law.................................................................. 9 1.1 The Church as a Spiritual and Governing Institution..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Petrus Vallis Caernaii - Historia Albigensium Et Sacri Belli in Eos AD 1209 Migne - Patrologia Latina - Volumen 213: Col 0543 - 0711
    Cooperatorum Veritatis Societas Excerpta ex Documenta Catholica Omnia 1209-1218- Petrus Vallis Caernaii - Historia Albigensium Et Sacri Belli In Eos AD 1209 Migne - Patrologia Latina - Volumen 213: Col 0543 - 0711 [0543] PETRI MONACHI COENOBII VALLIUM CERNAII HISTORIA ALBIGENSIUM ET SACRI BELLI IN EOS ANNO 1209 SUSCEPTI DUCE ET PRINCIPE SIMONE DE MONTEFORTI. (DUCHESNE, Script. Rer. Franc. t. V, pag. 544, ex editione Nicolai Camusati, canonici Trecensis,collata cum ms. codice domni Martini Marier, S. Martini Parisiensis monachi.) EPISTOLA NUNCUPATORIA AUCTORIS AD INNOCENTIUM III PONTIFICEM ROMANUM. Sanctissimo Patri et beatissimo domino INNOCENTIO Dei gratia universalis Ecclesiae summo pontifici, humilis licet immeritus servus ejus, frater PETRUS qualiscunque Vallium Cernay monachus, non solum oscula pedum, sed et ipsa pedum ejus vestigia humiliter deosculari. Benedictus Dominus Deus Sabaoth, qui novissime diebus nostris, sanctissime Pater, cooperante vestra sollicitudine non pigra, Ecclesiam suam in partibus Provinciae, inter persequentes haereticorum procellas, jam quasi penitus naufragantem, per ministrorum suorum manus, de ore leonum misericorditer eripuit, de bestiarum manibus liberavit. Verum, ne tam gloriosum et tam mirabile factum per evolutiones temporum successivas, possit in oblivionem venire, sed nota fiant in gentibus magnalia Dei nostri, seriem facti, qualicunque modo in scriptum redactam, vestrae, beatissime Pater, offero majestati, humiliter supplicans ne deputetur praesumptioni quod puer elementarius manum misit ad fortia:
    [Show full text]
  • Censure of Board Members Policy Code: 2118
    Censure of Board Members Policy Code: 2118 It is the policy of the Board of Education that all Board members conduct themselves in a professional manner and in accordance with the Code of Ethics adopted by the Board. A "censure" under this policy is the process by which the Board of Education, acting by a two-thirds majority vote (i.e. five affirmative votes), can reprimand or condemn the actions of a member for any violation of law or policy or any other conduct committed by a Board member which tends to injure the good name of the Buncombe County Board of Education and/or undermines the effectiveness of the Buncombe County Schools or the Board of Education. A censure is an expression of formal disapproval by the Board. The Board, in addition to or in lieu of censure, may vote to 1) ask the member to resign or 2) refer possible misconduct by a Board member to the District Attorney as provided by law and/or 3) issue the Board member an official warning regarding future conduct. The Board of Education does not have the legal authority to remove a Board member from office. Therefore, any legal consequences or punitive sanctions related to a Board member’s actions shall be in accordance with applicable law and shall be separate and distinct from any censure proceeding under this Policy. In the event that a member of the Board of Education believes that a fellow Board member should be formally censured by the Board, the following protocol shall apply: 1) All Board proceedings related to a censure motion, with the exception of the disclosure of confidential information as permitted by the Open Meetings Law, shall be conducted in an open meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Gerard Mannion Is to Be Congratulated for This Splendid Collection on the Papacy of John Paul II
    “Gerard Mannion is to be congratulated for this splendid collection on the papacy of John Paul II. Well-focused and insightful essays help us to understand his thoughts on philosophy, the papacy, women, the church, religious life, morality, collegiality, interreligious dialogue, and liberation theology. With authors representing a wide variety of perspectives, Mannion avoids the predictable ideological battles over the legacy of Pope John Paul; rather he captures the depth and complexity of this extraordinary figure by the balance, intelligence, and comprehensiveness of the volume. A well-planned and beautifully executed project!” —James F. Keenan, SJ Founders Professor in Theology Boston College Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts “Scenes of the charismatic John Paul II kissing the tarmac, praying with global religious leaders, addressing throngs of adoring young people, and finally dying linger in the world’s imagination. This book turns to another side of this outsized religious leader and examines his vision of the church and his theological positions. Each of these finely tuned essays show the greatness of this man by replacing the mythological account with the historical record. The straightforward, honest, expert, and yet accessible analyses situate John Paul II in his context and show both the triumphs and the ambiguities of his intellectual legacy. This masterful collection is absolutely basic reading for critically appreciating the papacy of John Paul II.” —Roger Haight, SJ Union Theological Seminary New York “The length of John Paul II’s tenure of the papacy, the complexity of his personality, and the ambivalence of his legacy make him not only a compelling subject of study, but also a challenging one.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecclesiae Sanctae’
    Cooperatorum Veritatis Societas Excerpta ex «Documenta Catholica Omnia» 1966-08-06 – SS Paulus VI – Motu Proprio ‘Ecclesiae Sanctae’ LITTERAE APOSTOLICAE MOTU PROPRIO DATAE* ECCLESIAE SANCTAE NORMAE AD QUAEDAM EXSEQUENDA SS. CONCILII VATICANI II DECRETA STATUUNTUR PAULUS PP. VI Ecclesiae Sanctae regimen sane postulat, ut, post celebratum Oecumenicum Concilium Vaticanum II, novae condantur normae novaeque rerum temperationes statuuntur, quae necessitatibus ab ipso inductis respondeant, atque magis magisque accommodentur novis apostolatus finibus ac provinciis, quae eiusdem Concilii opera Ecclesiae patuerunt in mundo huius temporis, qui, valde commutatus, radianti lumine eget ac supernaturalem caritatis ardorem desiderat. Quam ob rem, hisce ducti consiliis, ubi primum Oecumenica Synodus ad exitum pervenit, studiorum Commissiones constituimus, quae doctrinam ac rerum usum pro sua parte in id conferrent, ut certae definirentur normae ad Concilii Decreta exsequenda, quibus quaedam legis vacatio iam data erat. Huiusmodi Commissiones, sicut Litteris motu proprio datis die X superioris mensis Iunii, a verbis incipientibus Munus Apostolicum, libentes scripsimus, in commissum officium sedulo incubuerunt, Nobisque suas conclusiones tempore constituto fecerunt notas. Quas cum attento animo consideraverimus, rensemus tempus nunc esse commemoratas normas edi. Attamen, cum de materia agatur ad disciplinam pertinente, de qua rerum experientia plura adhuc suggerere potest, cumque ceterum propria Commissio operam det Codici Iuris Canonici recognoscendo
    [Show full text]
  • Esortazione Apostolica Post-Sinodale
    ESORTAZIONE APOSTOLICA POST-SINODALE ECCLESIA IN AMERICA DEL SANTO PADRE GIOVANNI PAOLO II AI VESCOVI AI PRESBITERI E AI DIACONI AI CONSACRATI ED ALLE CONSACRATE ED A TUTTI I FEDELI LAICI SULL'INCONTRO CON GESÙ CRISTO VIVO VIA PER LA CONVERSIONE, LA COMUNIONE E LA SOLIDARIETÀ IN AMERICA INTRODUZIONE 1. La Chiesa in America, piena di gioia per la fede ricevuta e riconoscente a Cristo per questo immenso dono, ha da poco celebrato il quinto centenario dell'inizio della predicazione del Vangelo sul proprio territorio. Questa commemorazione ha reso tutti i cattolici americani più coscienti del desiderio di Cristo di incontrare gli abitanti del cosiddetto Nuovo Mondo per incorporarli alla sua Chiesa e così rendersi presente nella storia del Continente. L'evangelizzazione dell'America non è soltanto un dono del Signore; è anche sorgente di nuove responsabilità. Grazie all'azione di quanti hanno evangelizzato in lungo e in largo il Continente, sono nati dalla Chiesa e dallo Spirito innumerevoli figli.(1) Nei loro cuori, nel passato come nel presente, continuano a risuonare le parole dell'Apostolo: « Non è infatti per me un vanto predicare il Vangelo; per me è un dovere: guai a me se non predicassi il Vangelo! » (1 Cor 9, 16). Tale dovere si fonda sul mandato conferito dal Signore risorto agli Apostoli prima della sua Ascensione al cielo: « Predicate il Vangelo ad ogni creatura » (Mc 16, 15). Questo mandato riguarda tutta la Chiesa, e la Chiesa che è in America, in questo particolare momento della sua storia, è chiamata ad accoglierlo e a rispondere con amorosa generosità al fondamentale compito dell'evangelizzazione.
    [Show full text]
  • A Long-Simmering Tension Over 'Creeping Infallibility' Published on National Catholic Reporter (
    A long-simmering tension over 'creeping infallibility' Published on National Catholic Reporter (http://ncronline.org) A long-simmering tension over 'creeping infallibility' May. 09, 2011 Vatican [1] ordinati.jpg [2] Priests lie prostrate before Pope Benedict XVI during their ordination Mass in St. Peter's Basilica at the Vatican May 7, 2006. (CNS/Chris Helgren) Rome -- When Pope Benedict XVI used the word "infallible" in reference to the ban on women's ordination in a recent letter informing an Australian bishop he'd been sacked, it marked the latest chapter of a long-simmering debate in Catholicism: Exactly where should the boundaries of infallible teaching be drawn? On one side are critics of "creeping infallibility," meaning a steady expansion of the set of church teachings that lie beyond debate. On the other are those, including Benedict, worried about "theological positivism," meaning that there is such a sharp emphasis on formal declarations of infallibility that all other teachings, no matter how constantly or emphatically they've been defined, seem up for grabs. That tension defines the fault lines in many areas of Catholic life, and it also forms part of the background to the recent Australian drama centering on Bishop William Morris of the Toowoomba diocese. Morris was removed from office May 2, apparently on the basis of a 2006 pastoral letter in which he suggested that, in the face of the priest shortage, the church may have to be open to the ordination of women, among other options. Morris has revealed portions of a letter from Benedict informing him of the action, in which the pope says Pope John Paul II defined the teaching on women priests "irrevocably and infallibly." In comments to the Australian media, Morris said that turn of phrase has him concerned about "creeping infallibility." Speaking on background, a Vatican official said this week that the Vatican never comments on the pope's correspondence but has "no reason to doubt" the authenticity of the letter.
    [Show full text]