Identification and Characterisation of Lgr4/Β-Catenin Signalling in Acute Myeloid Leukaemic Stem Cells

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Identification and Characterisation of Lgr4/Β-Catenin Signalling in Acute Myeloid Leukaemic Stem Cells Identification and Characterisation of Lgr4/β-catenin Signalling in Acute Myeloid Leukaemic Stem Cells Hangyu Yi Bachelor of Medical Science (Honours Class 1) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Women’s and Children’s Health Faculty of Medicine University of New South Wales February 2016 PLEASE TYPE THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Surname or Family name: Yi First name: Hangyu Other name/s: Abbreviation for degree as given in the University calendar: PhD School: School of Women’s and Children’s Health Faculty: Medicine Title: Identification and characterisation of Lgr4/β- catenin signalling in acute myeloid leukaemic stem cells Abstract 350 words maximum: (PLEASE TYPE) Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a deadly form of leukaemia resulting in the highest number of leukaemia-associated deaths. The high mortality rate is due to frequent relapse caused by the persistence of drug-resistant leukaemic stem cells (LSCs). We have previously demonstrated an essential role for β-catenin signalling in regulating LSCs in AML. Leucine-rich repeat containing G protein-coupled receptor 4 (Lgr4) has recently been identified as the receptor for R-spondin (Rspo) proteins to activate β-catenin. This study showed that Rspo2/Rspo3 cooperating with Wnt3a potently potentiated β-catenin activation in haematopoietic stem cell (HSC)-derived pre-LSCs. Overexpression of Lgr4 augmented activation of Wnt/β-catenin signalling and promoted leukaemogenesis in vivo. Inhibition of Lgr4 reduced β-catenin activity, completely abolished Rspo3/Wnt3a/β-catenin signalling and prevented leukaemia development. A microarray experiment of 104 AML patient samples showed that high Lgr4 expression was associated with poor outcomes of AML patients. Altogether, these findings provide strong evidence demonstrating Lgr4 to be a critical regulator of β-catenin signalling in AML. Gene expression profiling identified Rgs1 (regulator of G protein signalling 1) to be a major component of Lgr4 signalling. Rgs1 has been shown to bind directly to G protein subunits Gαq and Gαi (Moratz et al., J Immunol, 2000), and treatment of pre-LSCs with Gαq and Gαi inhibitors indicated Gαq to be a key downstream effector of Lgr4/Rgs1 signalling. Further functional studies showed that Gαq knockdown reduced β-catenin expression, attenuated the effect of Wnt3a/Rspo3-potentiated β-catenin activation and impaired LSC self-renewal, recapitulating the role of Lgr4 in LSC regulation. These data support the view that Gαq is an integral component of Lgr4 signalling in LSCs. Gene expression analysis also showed that Lgr4 knockdown increased expression of Gadd45a (growth arrest and DNA damage- inducible gene) and repressed several mitochondrial associated genes. Functional studies showed that Gadd45a deletion significantly increased in vivo LSC self-renewal and enhanced AML progression. Blockade of Lgr4 signalling inhibited mitochondrial energy metabolism, on which LSCs rely for survival. Collectively, this study has identified a novel Wnt3a/Rspo2/Rspo3-Lgr4Gαqβ-catenin signalling pathway governing LSCs and interference with components of this pathway may represent a promising therapeutic approach for eradicating LSCs in AML. Declaration relating to disposition of project thesis/dissertation I hereby grant to the University of New South Wales or its agents the right to archive and to make available my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in the University libraries in all forms of media, now or here after known, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. I retain all property rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation. I also authorise University Microfilms to use the 350 word abstract of my thesis in Dissertation Abstracts International (this is applicable to doctoral theses only). …………………………………………………… ……………………………………..……… ……….……………………...… Signature Witness Date The University recognises that there may be exceptional circumstances requiring restrictions on copying or conditions on use. Requests for restriction for a period of up to 2 years must be made in writing. Requests for a longer period of restriction may be considered in exceptional circumstances and require the approval of the Dean of Graduate Research. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date of completion of requirements for Award: THIS SHEET IS TO BE GLUED TO THE INSIDE FRONT COVER OF THE THESIS Originality statement ‘I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. Any contribution made to the research by others, with whom I have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the project's design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged.’ Signed ……………………………………… Date ……………………………………… i Copyright statement ‘I hereby grant the University of New South Wales or its agents the right to archive and to make available my thesis or dissertation in whole or part in the University libraries in all forms of media, now or here after known, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. I retain all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation. I also authorise University Microfilms to use the 350 word abstract of my thesis in Dissertation Abstract International (this is applicable to doctoral theses only). I have either used no substantial portions of copyright material in my thesis or I have obtained permission to use copyright material; where permission has not been granted I have applied/will apply for a partial restriction of the digital copy of my thesis or dissertation.' Signed ……………………………………… Date ……………………………………… Authenticity statement ‘I certify that the Library deposit digital copy is a direct equivalent of the final officially approved version of my thesis. No emendation of content has occurred and if there are any minor variations in formatting, they are the result of the conversion to digital format.’ Signed ……………………………………… Date ……………………………………… ii Abstract Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a deadly form of leukaemia resulting in the highest number of leukaemia-associated deaths. The high mortality rate is due to frequent relapse caused by the persistence of drug-resistant leukaemic stem cells (LSCs). We have previously demonstrated an essential role for β-catenin signalling in regulating LSCs in AML. Leucine-rich repeat containing G protein-coupled receptor 4 (Lgr4) has recently been identified as the receptor for R-spondin (Rspo) proteins to activate β-catenin. This study showed that Rspo2/Rspo3 cooperating with Wnt3a potently potentiated β-catenin activation in haematopoietic stem cell (HSC)-derived pre-LSCs. Overexpression of Lgr4 augmented activation of Wnt/β-catenin signalling and promoted leukaemogenesis in vivo. Inhibition of Lgr4 reduced β-catenin activity, completely abolished Rspo3/Wnt3a/β-catenin signalling and prevented leukaemia development. A microarray experiment of 104 AML patient samples showed that high Lgr4 expression was associated with poor outcomes of AML patients. Altogether, these findings provide strong evidence demonstrating Lgr4 to be a critical regulator of β-catenin signalling in AML. Gene expression profiling identified Rgs1 (regulator of G protein signalling 1) to be a major component of Lgr4 signalling. Rgs1 has been shown to bind directly to G protein subunits Gαq and Gαi (Moratz et al., J Immunol, 2000), and treatment of pre-LSCs with Gαq and Gαi inhibitors indicated Gαq to be a key downstream effector of Lgr4/Rgs1 signalling. Further functional studies showed that Gαq knockdown reduced β-catenin expression, attenuated the effect of Wnt3a/Rspo3-potentiated β-catenin activation and impaired LSC self-renewal, recapitulating the role of Lgr4 in LSC regulation. These data support the view that Gαq is an integral component of Lgr4 signalling in LSCs. iii Gene expression analysis also showed that Lgr4 knockdown increased expression of Gadd45a (growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible gene) and repressed several mitochondrial associated genes. Functional studies showed that Gadd45a deletion significantly increased in vivo LSC self-renewal and enhanced AML progression. Blockade of Lgr4 signalling inhibited mitochondrial energy metabolism, on which LSCs rely for survival. Collectively, this study has identified a novel Wnt3a/Rspo2/Rspo3-Lgr4Gαqβ- catenin signalling pathway governing LSCs and interference with components of this pathway may represent a promising therapeutic approach for eradicating LSCs in AML. iv 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Acute myeloid leukaemia .................................................................................. 2 1.1.1 Heterogeneity of AML ............................................................................... 4 1.1.1.1 Favourable genetic features ................................................................
Recommended publications
  • DNA Damage Activates a Spatially Distinct Late Cytoplasmic Cell-Cycle Checkpoint Network Controlled by MK2-Mediated RNA Stabilization
    DNA Damage Activates a Spatially Distinct Late Cytoplasmic Cell-Cycle Checkpoint Network Controlled by MK2-Mediated RNA Stabilization The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Reinhardt, H. Christian, Pia Hasskamp, Ingolf Schmedding, Sandra Morandell, Marcel A.T.M. van Vugt, XiaoZhe Wang, Rune Linding, et al. “DNA Damage Activates a Spatially Distinct Late Cytoplasmic Cell-Cycle Checkpoint Network Controlled by MK2-Mediated RNA Stabilization.” Molecular Cell 40, no. 1 (October 2010): 34–49.© 2010 Elsevier Inc. As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.018 Publisher Elsevier B.V. Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/85107 Terms of Use Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. Molecular Cell Article DNA Damage Activates a Spatially Distinct Late Cytoplasmic Cell-Cycle Checkpoint Network Controlled by MK2-Mediated RNA Stabilization H. Christian Reinhardt,1,6,7,8 Pia Hasskamp,1,10,11 Ingolf Schmedding,1,10,11 Sandra Morandell,1 Marcel A.T.M. van Vugt,5 XiaoZhe Wang,9 Rune Linding,4 Shao-En Ong,2 David Weaver,9 Steven A. Carr,2 and Michael B. Yaffe1,2,3,* 1David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02132, USA 2Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02132, USA 3Center for Cell Decision Processes,
    [Show full text]
  • Genome-Wide Prediction of Small Molecule Binding to Remote
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.04.236729; this version posted August 5, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Genome-wide Prediction of Small Molecule Binding 2 to Remote Orphan Proteins Using Distilled Sequence 3 Alignment Embedding 1 2 3 4 4 Tian Cai , Hansaim Lim , Kyra Alyssa Abbu , Yue Qiu , 5,6 1,2,3,4,7,* 5 Ruth Nussinov , and Lei Xie 1 6 Ph.D. Program in Computer Science, The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York, 10016, USA 2 7 Ph.D. Program in Biochemistry, The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York, 10016, USA 3 8 Department of Computer Science, Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, 10065, USA 4 9 Ph.D. Program in Biology, The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York, 10016, USA 5 10 Computational Structural Biology Section, Basic Science Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, 11 Frederick, MD 21702, USA 6 12 Department of Human Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel 13 Aviv, Israel 7 14 Helen and Robert Appel Alzheimer’s Disease Research Institute, Feil Family Brain & Mind Research Institute, Weill 15 Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, 10021, USA * 16 [email protected] 17 July 27, 2020 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.04.236729; this version posted August 5, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer
    Edinburgh Research Explorer International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXVIII. G protein-coupled receptor list Citation for published version: Davenport, AP, Alexander, SPH, Sharman, JL, Pawson, AJ, Benson, HE, Monaghan, AE, Liew, WC, Mpamhanga, CP, Bonner, TI, Neubig, RR, Pin, JP, Spedding, M & Harmar, AJ 2013, 'International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXVIII. G protein-coupled receptor list: recommendations for new pairings with cognate ligands', Pharmacological reviews, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 967-86. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.112.007179 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1124/pr.112.007179 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Pharmacological reviews Publisher Rights Statement: U.S. Government work not protected by U.S. copyright General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 1521-0081/65/3/967–986$25.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/pr.112.007179 PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS Pharmacol Rev 65:967–986, July 2013 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • 0.5) in Stat3∆/∆ Compared with Stat3flox/Flox
    Supplemental Table 2 Genes down-regulated (<0.5) in Stat3∆/∆ compared with Stat3flox/flox Probe ID Gene Symbol Gene Description Entrez gene ID 1460599_at Ermp1 endoplasmic reticulum metallopeptidase 1 226090 1460463_at H60c histocompatibility 60c 670558 1460431_at Gcnt1 glucosaminyl (N-acetyl) transferase 1, core 2 14537 1459979_x_at Zfp68 zinc finger protein 68 24135 1459747_at --- --- --- 1459608_at --- --- --- 1459168_at --- --- --- 1458718_at --- --- --- 1458618_at --- --- --- 1458466_at Ctsa cathepsin A 19025 1458345_s_at Colec11 collectin sub-family member 11 71693 1458046_at --- --- --- 1457769_at H60a histocompatibility 60a 15101 1457680_a_at Tmem69 transmembrane protein 69 230657 1457644_s_at Cxcl1 chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 14825 1457639_at Atp6v1h ATPase, H+ transporting, lysosomal V1 subunit H 108664 1457260_at 5730409E04Rik RIKEN cDNA 5730409E04Rik gene 230757 1457070_at --- --- --- 1456893_at --- --- --- 1456823_at Gm70 predicted gene 70 210762 1456671_at Tbrg3 transforming growth factor beta regulated gene 3 21378 1456211_at Nlrp10 NLR family, pyrin domain containing 10 244202 1455881_at Ier5l immediate early response 5-like 72500 1455576_at Rinl Ras and Rab interactor-like 320435 1455304_at Unc13c unc-13 homolog C (C. elegans) 208898 1455241_at BC037703 cDNA sequence BC037703 242125 1454866_s_at Clic6 chloride intracellular channel 6 209195 1453906_at Med13l mediator complex subunit 13-like 76199 1453522_at 6530401N04Rik RIKEN cDNA 6530401N04 gene 328092 1453354_at Gm11602 predicted gene 11602 100380944 1453234_at
    [Show full text]
  • Expression Profiling of KLF4
    Expression Profiling of KLF4 AJCR0000006 Supplemental Data Figure S1. Snapshot of enriched gene sets identified by GSEA in Klf4-null MEFs. Figure S2. Snapshot of enriched gene sets identified by GSEA in wild type MEFs. 98 Am J Cancer Res 2011;1(1):85-97 Table S1: Functional Annotation Clustering of Genes Up-Regulated in Klf4 -Null MEFs ILLUMINA_ID Gene Symbol Gene Name (Description) P -value Fold-Change Cell Cycle 8.00E-03 ILMN_1217331 Mcm6 MINICHROMOSOME MAINTENANCE DEFICIENT 6 40.36 ILMN_2723931 E2f6 E2F TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 6 26.8 ILMN_2724570 Mapk12 MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE 12 22.19 ILMN_1218470 Cdk2 CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE 2 9.32 ILMN_1234909 Tipin TIMELESS INTERACTING PROTEIN 5.3 ILMN_1212692 Mapk13 SAPK/ERK/KINASE 4 4.96 ILMN_2666690 Cul7 CULLIN 7 2.23 ILMN_2681776 Mapk6 MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE 4 2.11 ILMN_2652909 Ddit3 DNA-DAMAGE INDUCIBLE TRANSCRIPT 3 2.07 ILMN_2742152 Gadd45a GROWTH ARREST AND DNA-DAMAGE-INDUCIBLE 45 ALPHA 1.92 ILMN_1212787 Pttg1 PITUITARY TUMOR-TRANSFORMING 1 1.8 ILMN_1216721 Cdk5 CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE 5 1.78 ILMN_1227009 Gas2l1 GROWTH ARREST-SPECIFIC 2 LIKE 1 1.74 ILMN_2663009 Rassf5 RAS ASSOCIATION (RALGDS/AF-6) DOMAIN FAMILY 5 1.64 ILMN_1220454 Anapc13 ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX SUBUNIT 13 1.61 ILMN_1216213 Incenp INNER CENTROMERE PROTEIN 1.56 ILMN_1256301 Rcc2 REGULATOR OF CHROMOSOME CONDENSATION 2 1.53 Extracellular Matrix 5.80E-06 ILMN_2735184 Col18a1 PROCOLLAGEN, TYPE XVIII, ALPHA 1 51.5 ILMN_1223997 Crtap CARTILAGE ASSOCIATED PROTEIN 32.74 ILMN_2753809 Mmp3 MATRIX METALLOPEPTIDASE
    [Show full text]
  • Metabolite Sensing Gpcrs: Promising Therapeutic Targets for Cancer Treatment?
    cells Review Metabolite Sensing GPCRs: Promising Therapeutic Targets for Cancer Treatment? Jesús Cosín-Roger 1,*, Dolores Ortiz-Masia 2 , Maria Dolores Barrachina 3 and Sara Calatayud 3 1 Hospital Dr. Peset, Fundación para la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana, FISABIO, 46017 Valencia, Spain 2 Departament of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; [email protected] 3 Departament of Pharmacology and CIBER, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; [email protected] (M.D.B.); [email protected] (S.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-963851234 Received: 30 September 2020; Accepted: 21 October 2020; Published: 23 October 2020 Abstract: G-protein-coupled receptors constitute the most diverse and largest receptor family in the human genome, with approximately 800 different members identified. Given the well-known metabolic alterations in cancer development, we will focus specifically in the 19 G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which can be selectively activated by metabolites. These metabolite sensing GPCRs control crucial processes, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, and survival after their activation. In the present review, we will describe the main functions of these metabolite sensing GPCRs and shed light on the benefits of their potential use as possible pharmacological targets for cancer treatment. Keywords: G-protein-coupled receptor; metabolite sensing GPCR; cancer 1. Introduction G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are characterized by a seven-transmembrane configuration, constitute the largest and most ubiquitous family of plasma membrane receptors, and regulate virtually all known physiological processes in humans [1,2]. This family includes almost one thousand genes that were initially classified on the basis of sequence homology into six classes (A–F), where classes D and E were not found in vertebrates [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Functional Norrin Is a Ligand for the LGR4 Receptor
    2060 Research Article Multi-functional norrin is a ligand for the LGR4 receptor Cheng Deng1, Pradeep Reddy1, Yuan Cheng1, Ching-Wei Luo2, Chih-Lun Hsiao2 and Aaron J. W. Hsueh1,* 1Program of Reproductive and Stem Cell Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5317, USA 2Department of Life Sciences and Institute of Genome Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan *Author for correspondence ([email protected]) Accepted 25 January 2013 Journal of Cell Science 126, 2060–2068 ß 2013. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd doi: 10.1242/jcs.123471 Summary Mammalian LGR4, 5 and 6 are seven-transmembrane receptors that are important for diverse physiological processes. These receptors are orthologous to DLGR2, a Drosophila receptor activated by the burs/pburs heterodimer important for morphogenesis. Although recent studies indicated that four R-spondin proteins are cognate ligands for LGR4, 5 and 6 receptors, several BMP antagonists in vertebrates have been postulated to be orthologous to burs and pburs. Using newly available genome sequences, we showed that norrin is a vertebrate ortholog for insect burs and pburs and stimulates Wnt signaling mediated by LGR4, but not by LGR5 and 6, in mammalian cells. Although norrin could only activate LGR4, binding studies suggested interactions between norrin and LGR4, 5 and 6. Norrin, the Norrie disease gene product, is also capable of activating Wnt signaling mediated by the Frizzled4 receptor and serves as a BMP antagonist. Mutagenesis studies indicated that different norrin mutations found in patients with Norrie disease can be categorized into subgroups according to defects for signaling through the three distinct binding proteins.
    [Show full text]
  • G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Stem Cell Maintenance and Somatic Reprogramming to Pluripotent Or Cancer Stem Cells
    BMB Reports - Manuscript Submission Manuscript Draft Manuscript Number: BMB-14-250 Title: G protein-coupled receptors in stem cell maintenance and somatic reprogramming to pluripotent or cancer stem cells Article Type: Mini Review Keywords: G protein-coupled receptors; stem cell maintenance; somatic reprogramming; cancer stem cells; pluripotent stem cell Corresponding Author: Ssang-Goo Cho Authors: Ssang-Goo Cho1,*, Hye Yeon Choi1, Subbroto Kumar Saha1, Kyeongseok Kim1, Sangsu Kim1, Gwang-Mo Yang1, BongWoo Kim1, Jin-hoi Kim1 Institution: 1Department of Animal Biotechnology, Animal Resources Research Center, and Incurable Disease Animal Model and Stem Cell Institute (IDASI), Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 143-701, Republic of Korea, UNCORRECTED PROOF 1 G protein-coupled receptors in stem cell maintenance and somatic reprogramming to 2 pluripotent or cancer stem cells 3 4 Hye Yeon Choi, Subbroto Kumar Saha, Kyeongseok Kim, Sangsu Kim, Gwang-Mo 5 Yang, BongWoo Kim, Jin-hoi Kim, and Ssang-Goo Cho 6 7 Department of Animal Biotechnology, Animal Resources Research Center, and 8 Incurable Disease Animal Model and Stem Cell Institute (IDASI), Konkuk University, 9 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 143-701, Republic of Korea 10 * 11 Address correspondence to Ssang-Goo Cho, Department of Animal Biotechnology and 12 Animal Resources Research Center. Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin- 13 gu, Seoul 143-701, Republic of Korea. Tel: 82-2-450-4207, Fax: 82-2-450-1044, E-mail: 14 [email protected] 15 16 17 18 19 1 UNCORRECTED PROOF 20 Abstract 21 The G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) compose the third largest gene family in the 22 human genome, representing more than 800 distinct genes and 3–5% of the human genome.
    [Show full text]
  • G Protein-Coupled Receptors
    S.P.H. Alexander et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: G protein-coupled receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology (2015) 172, 5744–5869 THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: G protein-coupled receptors Stephen PH Alexander1, Anthony P Davenport2, Eamonn Kelly3, Neil Marrion3, John A Peters4, Helen E Benson5, Elena Faccenda5, Adam J Pawson5, Joanna L Sharman5, Christopher Southan5, Jamie A Davies5 and CGTP Collaborators 1School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK, 2Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK, 3School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK, 4Neuroscience Division, Medical Education Institute, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK, 5Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Abstract The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16 provides concise overviews of the key properties of over 1750 human drug targets with their pharmacology, plus links to an open access knowledgebase of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. The full contents can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ 10.1111/bph.13348/full. G protein-coupled receptors are one of the eight major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being: ligand-gated ion channels, voltage-gated ion channels, other ion channels, nuclear hormone receptors, catalytic receptors, enzymes and transporters. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside key references and suggestions for further reading.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Functionality of Proteins Involved in GPCR and G Protein Signaling: Making Sense of Structure–Function Continuum with In
    Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2019) 76:4461–4492 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-019-03276-1 Cellular andMolecular Life Sciences REVIEW Multi‑functionality of proteins involved in GPCR and G protein signaling: making sense of structure–function continuum with intrinsic disorder‑based proteoforms Alexander V. Fonin1 · April L. Darling2 · Irina M. Kuznetsova1 · Konstantin K. Turoverov1,3 · Vladimir N. Uversky2,4 Received: 5 August 2019 / Revised: 5 August 2019 / Accepted: 12 August 2019 / Published online: 19 August 2019 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Abstract GPCR–G protein signaling system recognizes a multitude of extracellular ligands and triggers a variety of intracellular signal- ing cascades in response. In humans, this system includes more than 800 various GPCRs and a large set of heterotrimeric G proteins. Complexity of this system goes far beyond a multitude of pair-wise ligand–GPCR and GPCR–G protein interactions. In fact, one GPCR can recognize more than one extracellular signal and interact with more than one G protein. Furthermore, one ligand can activate more than one GPCR, and multiple GPCRs can couple to the same G protein. This defnes an intricate multifunctionality of this important signaling system. Here, we show that the multifunctionality of GPCR–G protein system represents an illustrative example of the protein structure–function continuum, where structures of the involved proteins represent a complex mosaic of diferently folded regions (foldons, non-foldons, unfoldons, semi-foldons, and inducible foldons). The functionality of resulting highly dynamic conformational ensembles is fne-tuned by various post-translational modifcations and alternative splicing, and such ensembles can undergo dramatic changes at interaction with their specifc partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Gadd45a Regulates B-Catenin Distribution and Maintains Cell–Cell Adhesion/ Contact
    Oncogene (2007) 26, 6396–6405 & 2007 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0950-9232/07 $30.00 www.nature.com/onc ORIGINAL ARTICLE Gadd45a regulates b-catenin distribution and maintains cell–cell adhesion/ contact JJi1, R Liu1, T Tong, Y Song, S Jin, M Wu and Q Zhan State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China Gadd45a,a growth arrest and DNA-damage gene,plays 1999;Jin et al., 2000;Tong et al., 2005). Gadd45a important roles in the control of cell cycle checkpoints, also plays roles in negative regulation of cell malig- DNA repair and apoptosis. We show here that Gadd45a is nancy. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) derived involved in the control of cell contact inhibition and cell– from Gadd45a-null mice exhibited genomic instability, cell adhesion. Gadd45a can serve as an adapter to enhance single oncogene-mediated transformation, loss of nor- the interaction between b-catenin and Caveolin-1,and in mal cellular senescence, increased cellular proliferation, turn induces b-catenin translocation to cell membrane for centrosome amplification and reduced DNA repair maintaining cell–cell adhesion/contact inhibition. This is (Hollander et al., 1999;Smith et al., 2000). Gadd45a- coupled with reduction of b-catenin in cytoplasm and null mice have an increased frequency of tumorigenesis nucleus following Gadd45a induction,which is reflected by by ionizing radiation (IR), ultraviolet radiation (UVR) the downregulation of cyclin D1,one of the b-catenin and dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA), although these targeted genes. Additionally,Gadd45a facilitates ultra- mice do not develop spontaneous tumors (Hollander violet radiation-induced degradation of cytoplasmic and et al., 1999, 2001;Hildesheim et al., 2002).
    [Show full text]