DOCSLIB.ORG

What Kind of Church Is This?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What Kind of Church Is This? WHY I BELONG T O T HE C HRISTIA N C HURC H I STAYI NG C ONNE CT ED I B EYON D S LOG ANS ® RESOURCING CHRISTIAN CHURCHES SPECIAL EDITION What kind of church is this? www.christianstandard.com What kind of church is this? BY LEROY LAWSON One thing is certain—there is no shortage of churches. You can take your pick among the hundreds of different kinds, from the proud old denominations like the Episcopalian and Presbyterian to the newer, more energetic Assembly of God or Seventh Day Adventists, to say nothing of those amazingly numerous and various cults that keep springing up. In the midst of such diversity, what is special about our church? What kind of a church is it, anyway? A Paradox and a Challenge Our Roots We answer paradoxically. !e distinc- Christian churches and churches of tive about this Christian church is that it Christ trace their modern origins to the has no distinctives. In fact we deliberately early 19th-century American frontier, a seek not to be di#erent, because our goal period of militancy among denominations. Barton W. Stone, some Presbyterian leaders is unity, not division. Christianity has America’s pioneers brought their deeply in Kentucky published e Last Will and su#ered long enough from deep divi- rooted religious convictions to the new Testament of the Spring#eld Presbytery , sions separating denomination from de- land and perpetuated their old animosities. putting to death their denominational nomination, Christian from Christian. Presbyterian squared o# against Anglican connections. !ey said, “We will, that When Jesus prayed “that all of them may who defended himself against Baptist who this body die, be dissolved, and sink into be one, Father, just as you are in me and I had no toleration for Lutheran. A reaction union with the Body of Christ at large; for am in you. May they also be in us” (John to this mutual animosity was inevitable. there is but one body, and one Spirit . .” 17:21), he had us in mind. In the spirit of When it came, the reaction was sponta- !e early leaders of what later came to be his prayer we seek unity with all others in neous. A group of New England Christians called the Restoration Movement believed Christ. Obviously that desire is di$cult to broke out of denominationalism, announc- unity in Christ was—and is—possible. achieve. Human nature resists oneness. ing their intention to follow the Bible only. To achieve it required letting go of human We seem to believe with Robert Frost that Another group in Kentucky, and still traditions and loyalties to dynamic per- “good fences make good neighbors,” even another in Pennsylvania, each independent sonalities. Christ alone could be exalted. though something within us “doesn’t love of the others, felt the spirit of unity mov- !e ideal of the church that emerges from a wall, [but] wants it down.” God desires ing them to stand with, not against, fellow the pages of the New Testament must be 2 unity, however, so it must be possible. Christians. Under the leadership of minister the standard for today’s congregations. Left: Northside Christian Church in Spring, Texas. Below: Southwest Christian Church in Austin, Texas. the Stone movement, another Presbyterian 2. !at . there ought to be no schisms, minister, !omas Campbell, published his no uncharitable divisions among [local now famous Declaration and Address in 1809. congregations]. He had earlier migrated to Pennsylvania from his home in Ireland. While still there, 3. !at . nothing ought to be inculcated he had grown restless with the strictures upon Christians as articles of faith; of his denomination, the Old-Light Anti- nor required of them as terms of Burgher Seceder Presbyterian Church, communion; but what is expressly a splinter of a split of a division in the taught and enjoined upon them, in the denomination. Word of God. When he found the divisions caused 4. !at . the New Testament is as per- by local grievances in Scotland separat- fect a constitution for the worship, dis- ing Presbyterians in America, he rebelled. cipline, and government of the New He would not exclude nonmembers of his Testament church, and as perfect a rule denomination from Communion in his of the particular duties of its mem- church. He was expelled from his presby- bers, as the Old Testament was for the tery. It was really a question of who %red worship, discipline, and government whom, for by this time Campbell could of the Old Testament church. not carry out policies he deplored. His son Alexander, meanwhile, had 5. !at . [no] human authority [has] reached similar conclusions in his stud- power to impose new commands or ies in Ireland and Scotland and, when fa- ordinances upon the church, which ther and son were reunited in America in our Lord Jesus Christ has not en- 1809, each embraced the other’s position. joined. In time, the son surpassed the father as the leader of their unity movement. !ere are more propositions, but these are enough to show Campbell’s Principles for Today unusual good judgment. From his day In his Declaration , !omas Campbell until now, millions of others have de- set forth principles that sound as modern cided they also wanted to be Christians The ideal of the church that as today to New Testament Christians: only, without the complications of denomination. emerges from the pages 1. !at the church of Christ upon earth of the New Testament must is essentially, intentionally, and consti- LeRoy Lawson is international consultant with CMF tutionally one; consisting of all those International and professor of Christian ministries at be the standard for today’s Emmanuel Christian Seminary in Johnson City, Tennessee. in every place that profess their faith He also serves as a C HRISTIAN STANDARD contriButing editor congregations. in Christ and obedience to him in all and memBer of Standard PuBlishing’s PuBlishing things according to the Scriptures. Committee. Studying the Ideal While gratefully acknowledging their debt to great reformers like Martin Luther, John Calvin, John Knox, and others, these “Christians only” believed their reforms remained unfinished. The only way to determine what the church should be and how Christians should behave is to study New Testament documents in which the churches of Christ are presented in splendor —and in shortcomings. While there is no single church that we should imitate, the ideal of the church as the body of Christ, the household of faith, the temple of the Holy Spirit, and the people of God is clear- ly pictured. In a unity e#ort initially separated from 3 “What church are you with?” “Christian.” “No, I mean what denomination.” “Christian. We just call ourselves Christians.” “Oh.” I BelongWhy to the Christian Church BY RALPH KINNEY BENNETT I could not begin to count how many times I have engaged in such an exchange, and I am sure it is familiar to many in our fellowship. By insisting that Christians should call themselves just that, the 19th-century American religious leader Alexander Campbell clearly signaled a return to fundamentals and equipped us with a marvelous intellectual “foot-in- the-door.” Simplicity Once we begin to explain why we call ourselves “Christians only,” once we intro- duce the biblical foundation, the logic, the simplicity of it, we have opened the way to the very roots and heart of what the strive to remove all the manmade clutter baptism and partaking at the Lord’s table church is and is supposed to be. It is the between me and the worship of the Lord. —are presented in the simplest, most body of Christ on earth. It is supposed In that, these congregations cleave to the straightforward and unornamented way. to be—despite all the well-intentioned New Testament ideal. !at ideal is charac- It is clear that they are not rituals but rather additions and accretions we humans have terized by simplicity. dynamic acts of participation. put upon it—nothing more or less than Is there anything so spare in its outlines Baptism is the indelible benchmark of spiritually reborn people worshipping yet so rich in its reality as the New Testament a sacred transaction between an individual God and living by his Word. church? !e New Testament picture of soul and God himself. Why am I a member of the church of Christians congregating portrays nothing !e Lord’s table is the continuing living Christ? Because I believe independent elaborate—just people praying, praising, link with the historical act of Christ’s 4 Christian churches and churches of Christ and preaching. !ese essential elements— sacri%ce. and their congregations were often addressed as “churches of Christ.” 5. An apostolic church The church, Ephesians 2:20 states, is “built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the chief cornerstone.” Whatever we know about Christ and the church we learned from Jesus’ closest companions, the apostles. 6. A thinking church In the same Ephesian letter, Paul prays that God will give a “Spirit of wisdom and revelation, so that you may know him better. .” Christian faith demands the best our minds can give, so we are a studying church, seeking to apply biblical truth intelligently. 7. A feeling church Ours is not a dryly intellectual approach to God, however. We rejoice and praise and pray and love and serve from the heart. We are unashamed of the gospel Our Position and not embarrassed to let our Variety excitement be seen. On the other hand, the New Testament How shall we summarize what kind picture of Christian living is a rich tapestry of church we are talking about? 8.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Enter Your Title Here in All Capital Letters
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by K-State Research Exchange THE BATTLE CRY OF PEACE: THE LEADERSHIP OF THE DISCIPLES OF CHRIST MOVEMENT DURING THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR, 1861-1865 by DARIN A.TUCK B. A., Washburn University, 2007 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS Department of History College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2010 Approved by: Major Professor Robert D. Linder Copyright DARIN A. TUCK 2010 Abstract As the United States descended into war in 1861, the religious leaders of the nation were among the foremost advocates and recruiters for both the Confederate and Union forces. They exercised enormous influence over the laity, and used their sermons and periodicals to justify, promote, and condone the brutal fratricide. Although many historians have focused on the promoters of war, they have almost completely ignored the Disciples of Christ, a loosely organized religious movement based on anti-sectarianism and primitive Christianity, who used their pulpits and periodicals as a platform for peace. This study attempts to merge the remarkable story of the Disciples peace message into a narrative of the Civil War. Their plea for nonviolence was not an isolated event, but a component of a committed, biblically-based response to the outbreak of war from many of the most prominent leaders of the movement. Immersed in the patriotic calls for war, their stance was extremely unpopular and even viewed as traitorous in their communities and congregations. This study adds to the current Disciples historiography, which states that the issue of slavery and the Civil War divided the movement North and South, by arguing that the peace message professed by its major leaders divided the movement also within the sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Unity in Stone-Campbell Movement
    M. Horvatek: New Testament Paradigm of the Unity of Christians Christian Unity in Stone-Campbell Movement Douglas A. FOSTER Abilene Christian University, USA UDK: 261.8 Original scientific paper Received: February 15, 2008. Accepted: March 15, 2008. Abstract Author offers review of the backgrounds to Stone-Campbell concepts of Christian unity, insides on the early unity impulse in the Stone-Camp- bell Movement, as well as the development of the idea of unity in the Post-Bellum Period. A valuable explanation is offered on the twentieth- century understandings of unity in the Three Streams, and on the efforts at internal unity in the Stone-Campbell Movement. Introduction In the western church the divisions resulting from the Protestant Reformation became a source of deep concern for some leaders. Lutheran Philipp Melanch- thon proposed compromise in the area of adiaphora, indifferent or non-essential matters, if it would maintain the church’s visible unity. George Calixtus suggested that only heresy, defined as denial of an essential truth of Christianity believed by the church in the first five centuries, could be the basis for breaking fellow- ship. Calvin and other Reformed theologians insisted that the true church was invisible, ultimately known only to God, thus lessening the severity of the visible divisions. I. Backgrounds to Stone-Campbell Concepts of Christian Unity The transplanting of European Christianity to America exacerbated its divisions as religious freedom led to schism in existing bodies and the creation of new ones. For many Americans the developing system of denominationalism appeared to be the desired and normal condition of the church.
    [Show full text]
  • Journalism's Deep Roots in the Stone-Campbell Movement
    Journal of Discipliana Volume 74 Issue 1 Journal of Discipliana Volume 74 Article 2 2021 Journalism’s Deep Roots in the Stone-Campbell Movement John M. Imbler Phillips Theological Seminary, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.discipleshistory.org/journalofdiscipliana Part of the Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, History of Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Imbler, John M. (2021) "Journalism’s Deep Roots in the Stone-Campbell Movement," Journal of Discipliana: Vol. 74 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.discipleshistory.org/journalofdiscipliana/vol74/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Disciples History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Discipliana by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Disciples History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Imbler: Journalism’s Deep Roots in the Stone-Campbell Movement Journalism’s Deep Roots in the Stone-Campbell Movement John M. Imbler As the recently constituted nation was expanding beyond the settled northeast, in- formation on a variety of subjects was carried by an increasing number of newly estab- lished local presses. Presidential historian Doris Kearns Goodwin observes, “With few public entertainments in rural America (c. 1850s), villages and farmers regarded the spo- ken word and political debates as riveting spectator sports.” She continues, “Following such debates, the dueling remarks were regularly printed in their entirety in newspapers then reprinted in pamphlet form…where they provoked discourse over a wide space and prolonged time.”1 While her analysis refers to the general population, it also reflects the character of the Stone-Campbell people who were heavily invested in publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Stone-Campbell Biography Edwin R. Errett: Martyr to a Lost Cause
    Leaven Volume 7 Issue 1 Missions and the Church Article 21 1-1-1999 Stone-Campbell Biography Edwin R. Errett: Martyr to a Lost Cause Henry Webb Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/leaven Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Webb, Henry (1999) "Stone-Campbell Biography Edwin R. Errett: Martyr to a Lost Cause," Leaven: Vol. 7 : Iss. 1 , Article 21. Available at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/leaven/vol7/iss1/21 This Biography is brought to you for free and open access by the Religion at Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Leaven by an authorized editor of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Webb: Stone-Campbell Biography Edwin R. Errett: Martyr to a Lost Cause 48 Leaven, Winter, 1999 Stone-Campbell Biography EDWIN R. ERRETT: Martyr to a Lost Cause Henry Webb Edwin R. Errett, editor of the writer of Bible school materials, and a conservative institution for ministe- Christian Standard from 1929 until his in the latter year he was made editor- rial education, the Cincinnati Bible death in 1944, is known primarily for in-chief of all Bible school publica- Institute. When that school was merged the leadership he provided to Christian tions. In 1929 he was named editor of with McGarvey Bible Institute in 1924 Churches/Churches of Christ during a the Christian Standard. For the next to form Cincinnati Bible Seminary, critical period in their history.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodicals of the Disciples of Christ and Related Religious Groups
    Disciples of Christ Historical Society Digital Commons @ Disciples History Stone-Campbell Movement Periodical Indexes 1943 Periodicals of the Disciples of Christ and Related Religious Groups Claude E. Spencer Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.discipleshistory.org/all_periodical_indexes PERIODICALS OF The Disciples of Christ SPENCER " NORTH CAROLINA HRISTIAN MISSIONARY CONVENTION C.C.WARE WILSON.N.C. Jlvcnivist !1iW iPii^PHiii PERIODICALS of the DISCIPLES OF CHRIST and RELATED RELIGIOUS GROUPS compiled by Claude E. Spencer Disciples of Christ Historical Society- Canton,, Missouri 1943 DISCIPLIANA LIBRARY CHRISTIAN COLLEGE «5 ^3 jp ATLANTIC WILSON, N. C. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/periodicalsofdisOOclau DISCIPLES OF CHRIST HISTORICAL SOCIETY OFFICERS J, Edward Moseley President W, H. Hanna Vice-president A. T. DeGroot Secretary- treasurer Claude E. Spencer Curator EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Term Expiring 1943 Term Expiring 1944 Warner Muir W. H. Hanna Merl R. Eppse A. T. DeGroot Walter C. G-ibbs Edgar C. Riley Richard L. James W. E, Garrison George N. Mayhew Eva Jean Wrather Stephen J. England Claude E, Spencer James DeForest Murch J, Edward Moseley Term Expiring 1945 C. C. Ware Colby D. Hall Henry K. Shaw Enos E. Dowling Reuben Butchart Mrs. W. D. Barnhart Dwight E. Stevenson - li- FORWORD Periodicals of the Disciples of Christ and related reli gious groups, made possible through the cooperation of Culver- Stockton college with the Disciples of Christ Historical Society, is the first attempt at a comprehensive list of the periodicals of the Disciples of Christ, the Christian church, and the churches of Christ. In this work I have attempted to list the title of every periodical designed for more than individual church circulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Churches of Christ and Christian Churches in Early Oregon, 1842-1882 Jerry Rushford Pepperdine University
    Pepperdine University Pepperdine Digital Commons Churches of Christ Heritage Center Jerry Rushford Center 1-1-1998 Christians on the Oregon Trail: Churches of Christ and Christian Churches in Early Oregon, 1842-1882 Jerry Rushford Pepperdine University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/heritage_center Part of the Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Rushford, Jerry, "Christians on the Oregon Trail: Churches of Christ and Christian Churches in Early Oregon, 1842-1882" (1998). Churches of Christ Heritage Center. Item 5. http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/heritage_center/5 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Jerry Rushford Center at Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Churches of Christ Heritage Center by an authorized administrator of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHRISTIANS About the Author ON THE Jerry Rushford came to Malibu in April 1978 as the pulpit minister for the University OREGON TRAIL Church of Christ and as a professor of church history in Pepperdine’s Religion Division. In the fall of 1982, he assumed his current posi­ The Restoration Movement originated on tion as director of Church Relations for the American frontier in a period of religious Pepperdine University. He continues to teach half time at the University, focusing on church enthusiasm and ferment at the beginning of history and the ministry of preaching, as well the nineteenth century. The first leaders of the as required religion courses. movement deplored the numerous divisions in He received his education from Michigan the church and urged the unity of all Christian College, A.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between James A. Garfield and the Disciples of Christ" (1977)
    Pepperdine University Pepperdine Digital Commons Churches of Christ Heritage Center Jerry Rushford Center 8-1-1977 Political Disciple: The Relationship Between James A. Garfield nda the Disciples of Christ Jerry Rushford Pepperdine University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/heritage_center Part of the Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Rushford, Jerry, "Political Disciple: The Relationship Between James A. Garfield and the Disciples of Christ" (1977). Churches of Christ Heritage Center. Item 7. http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/heritage_center/7 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Jerry Rushford Center at Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Churches of Christ Heritage Center by an authorized administrator of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. From the Personal Library of Jerry Rushford Escomb Saxon Church, County Durham, England. Built c. A.D, 670 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Po litic a l Disciple: The Relationship Between James A. Garfield and the Disciples of C hrist A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Religion in America by Jerry Bryant Rushford Committee in charge: Professor Robert Michaelsen, Chairman Professor Roderick Nash Professor Carl V. Harris August 1977 The dissertation of Jerry Bryant Rushford is approved: August 1977 PUBLICATION OPTION I hereby reserve a ll rights of publication, including the right to reproduce this disser­ tation, in any form for a period of three years from the date of submission. Sig n e d FOR L O R I, who sha re d i t a l l iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to thank members of the sta ffs of the follow­ ing institutions for their help in locating materials: the Williams College Library, Williamstown, Massachusetts; the Manuscript Division of the Library of Congress; the Bethany College Library, Bethany, West Virginia; the Hiram College Library, Hiram, Ohio; the James A.
    [Show full text]
  • From Segregation to Independence: African Americans in Churches of Christ
    FROM SEGREGATION TO INDEPENDENCE: AFRICAN AMERICANS IN CHURCHES OF CHRIST By Theodore Wesley Crawford Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Religion August, 2008 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Dr. Dennis C. Dickerson Dr. Kathleen Flake Dr. John S. McClure Dr. Lucius Outlaw To my father, who helped make this possible but did not live to see its completion and To my wife, Kim, whose support is responsible for this project ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page DEDICATION……………………………………………………………………. ii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS…………………………………………………….. v INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………… vii Chapter I. UNDERSTANDING CHUCHES OF CHRIST……………..……………. 1 Denominational Organization…………………………………………. 1 Churches of Christ Journals………………………………………….... 7 Churches of Christ Schools………………………………………...….. 21 Churches of Christ Lectureships………………………………………. 34 Conclusion……………………………………………………………... 38 II. SEGREGATION…………………………………………………………... 40 White-Imposed Segregation…………………………...……………… 41 The Life and Ministry of Marshall Keeble…………...……………….. 61 Conclusion…………………………………………………………….. 83 III. INDEPENDENCE………………………………………………………… 84 The Foundation of Independence..……….…………………………… 85 African American Independence……………………………………… 98 White Responses to the Civil Rights Movement……………………… 117 A United Effort: The Race Relations Workshops…………………….. 128 Conclusion…………………………………………………………….. 134 iii IV. THE CLOSING OF NASHVILLE CHRISTIAN INSTITUTE…………… 137
    [Show full text]
  • Inclusion As a Nonviolent Necessity: an Appeal to Stone-Campbell Movement Ideals
    INCLUSION AS A NONVIOLENT NECESSITY: AN APPEAL TO STONE-CAMPBELL MOVEMENT IDEALS Michael Shepherd, MA, MS While discussing violence in the Hebrew Bible1, it is tempting to consider the practice of spiritually-motivated violence from a distance. Obscured by the fog of cultural differences and a belief in human progress, we can ascribe these instances to primitive ethical and spiritual understandings. We have a sense that who we believe ourselves to be (rational) and what we believe about the early and persisting Christian witness (loving) create a religious tradition that is not fixated on violent expressions of divine commands. Nevertheless, spiritually-motivated violence persists within contemporary Christianity--including within the Stone-Campbell Movement--through the exclusion of the LGBTQ+ community and enforcement of sanctified cisheteronormativity.2 Violence, in this context, is not limited to physical harm or outright hate-crimes. The spiritually-motivated violence that is inflicted upon LGBTQ+ Christians is expressed in physical, psychological, relational, and economic forms and manifests both directly and indirectly to diminish, distance, dehumanize, and discard people who are made in the image of God. To justify this violence, the few biblical texts pertaining to sexuality have been largely maintained as literal and universal precepts. Two verses in particular are used as a foundation to support this violent posture against LGBTQ+ people: Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 both specify men having sex with other men as a taboo. The penalties for this offense are that the men are to be “cut off from their people” (18:29) and to be executed (20:13). These texts come from within the “Holiness Code” which are most likely post-exilic elaboration on Hebrew rituals and morality.3 Additional stories, such as the destruction of Sodom, exist in the imaginations of many 1 Presented as part of the 2021 Stone-Campbell Journal Conference on the theme of “Violence of God in the Old Testament”.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration Women Who Responded to the Spirit Before 1900
    Leaven Volume 16 Issue 1 Your Sons and Your Daughters Shall Article 5 Prophesy 1-1-2008 Restoration Women Who Responded to the Spirit Before 1900 Bonnie Miller Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/leaven Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Miller, Bonnie (2008) "Restoration Women Who Responded to the Spirit Before 1900," Leaven: Vol. 16 : Iss. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/leaven/vol16/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Religion at Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Leaven by an authorized editor of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Miller: Restoration Women Who Responded to the Spirit Before 1900 Restoration Women Who Responded to the Spirit Before 1900 BONNIE MILLER n1841 the Christian Palladium published a statement from Elder J. Chadwick that women could "tell the story of Calvary, and invite sinners to Christ," but not as preachers. "The ministerial and pastoral Ioffice implies authority," he wrote, "and as such, is given exclusively to men."! An opposite view was expressed by George T. Smith in the Christian Standard in 1893, "Can a woman do good by speaking in the churches? ... If so, she is under obligation to use her talent God has given her. He will call her to account if she does not.'? Some, such as Elder Chadwick, opposed women preachers on the basis of the authority associated with the office.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration Church History 2021
    RESTORATION CHURCH HISTORY 2021 Bibliographical tools of special interest to the Restoration Movement, which includes the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) [usually referred to as Disciples of Christ], Christian Churches/Churches of Christ [usually referred to as the Christian Church or Independent Christian Church] and Churches of Christ. Since Leroy Garrett’s The Stone-Campbell Movement: An Anecdotal History of Three Churches (1981), those who see it more as a unity movement than a Restoration Movement refer to it as the Stone- Campbell Movement. *R.R.286.6/E56. Foster, Douglas A., Paul M. Blowers, Anthony L. Dunnavant, and D. Newell Williams, eds. The Encyclopedia of the Stone-Campbell Movement. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2004. Contains almost 600 articles (most with bibliographies) by over 300 contributors on individuals, events, places, institutions, publications, and theological tenets of the American Restoration Movement. Illustrated by over 200 photographs. Contains an index. *R.R.286.609/S877g. Williams, D. Newell, Douglas A. Foster, and Paul M. Blowers, eds. The Stone- Campbell Movement: A Global History. St. Louis: Chalice Press, 2013. A synchronous history of the different branches of the Restoration Movement, including the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ); Christian Churches/Churches of Christ; Churches of Christ; and Church of Christ, Disciples of Christ [African American]. Presents a history of each group by era and/or area. The 14 contributors represent the different groups, except the Church of Christ, Disciples of Christ: 7 from the Disciples of Christ, 2 from the Christian Church, and 5 from the Churches of Christ. Includes extensive end notes (382-436) and index.
    [Show full text]
  • Apostasy and Restoration
    February/2006 Volume XXXVII, No. 2 $14.00 per year;2 years $24.00 FOR THOSE WHO LOVE THE TRUTH AND HATE ERROR APOSTASY AND RESTORATION Ian McPherson Christ established His church in the New Testament 50-117) thought that it would be more advantageous to call era through the power of the Holy Spirit on the Jewish Day the chairman of the board of elders a “bishop”. “Elder” of Pentecost just fifty days from his death. When people meant an older distinguished person, and “bishop” meant were baptized for the remission of their sins the Lord added “overseer”. These both refer to the same office. (II Timo- those who were saved from their sins to His church (Acts thy 3:1-8, Titus 1:5-9) The Greek words which describe 2:38, 41, 47). The Apostle’s doctrine formed the basis of them are used interchangeably (Acts 20:28). After the its teaching (Acts 2:42). The church continued to grow in trend introduced by Ignatius, the church gradually became Jerusalem, and when persecution came it scattered. The centralized. gospel spread from Jerusalem to Judea and then Samaria First, Bishops from local congregations began meeting and to the uttermost parts of the earth (Acts 1:8). Ulti- together and making decisions on behalf of their allotted mately, within the first century the gospel was preached to areas known as a diocese. every person under heaven (Colossians 1:23). Second, people began trying to trace a fictitious line The church that was established was not a denomina- of bishops back to the apostolic era, and power hungry tion but it was planned in the eternal, omniscient, and bishops began pointing to Peter as the Chief Apostle and omnipotent mind of God (Ephesians 3:10), purchased by to Rome as the seat of religious power in the Church.
    [Show full text]