Pogonichthys Macrolepidotus) in the San Francisco Estuary: a Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pogonichthys Macrolepidotus) in the San Francisco Estuary: a Review UC Davis San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science Title Biology and Population Dynamics of Sacramento Splittail (Pogonichthys macrolepidotus) in the San Francisco Estuary: A Review Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/61r48686 Journal San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 2(2) ISSN 1546-2366 Authors Moyle, Peter B Baxter, Randall D Sommer, Ted et al. Publication Date 2004 DOI 10.15447/sfews.2004v2iss2art3 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California MAY 2004 SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARYESTUARYESTUARY&WAT & WATERSHED&WATERSHEDERSHED Published for the San Francisco Bay-Delta SCIENCEScience Consortium by the John Muir Institute of the Environment Biology and Population Dynamics of Sacramento Splittail (Pogonichthys macrolepidotus) in the San Francisco Estuary: A Review Peter B. Moyle1, Randall D. Baxter2, Ted Sommer3, Ted C. Foin4, and Scott A. Matern5 1 Dept. of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, CA. 2 California Dept. of Fish and Game, Stockton, CA. 3 California Dept. of Water Resources, Sacramento, CA. 4 Dept. of Agronomy and Range Science, University of California, Davis, CA. 5 Dept. of Biological Science, Diablo Valley College, Pleasant Hill, CA. ABSTRACT examine how the timing, magnitude, and duration of high flows contribute to the generation of strong year The Sacramento splittail (Pogonichthys macrolepidotus) classes, (2) to describe differences in YOY survival on is a cyprinid fish endemic to the Central Valley of the floodplain and in river margins from hatching to California with a range that centers on the San down-river migration, (3) explore the possible trophic Francisco Estuary. It is a state Species of Special effects of new invaders such as the overbite clam and Concern and was only recently (2003) delisted as a Siberian prawn, and (4) determine the response of threatened species by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife splittail populations to climate change and sea level Service. Splittail live 7-9 years, tolerate a wide range rise. of environmental conditions, and have high fecundity. Typically, adults migrate upstream in January and February and spawn on seasonally inundated flood- KEYWORDS plains in March and April. In May the juveniles Sacramento River, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, migrate back downstream to shallow, brackish water Sutter Bypass, Yolo Bypass, floodplain, endangered rearing grounds, where they feed on detritus and fishes, Cyprinidae. invertebrates for 1-2 years before migrating back upstream to spawn. Seven long-term sampling pro- SUGGESTED CITATION grams in the estuary indicate that the splittail popula- tion is maintained by strong year classes resulting Moyle PB, Baxter RD, Sommer T, Foin TC, Matern SA. from successful spawning in wet years, although some 2004. Biology and population dynamics of Sacramento spawning occurs in all years. Modeling shows them to splittail (Pogonichthys macrolepidotus) in the San be resilient, but managing floodplains to promote fre- Francisco Estuary: a review. San Francisco Estuary quent successful spawning is needed to keep them and Watershed Science [online serial]. abundant. Additionally, it is important to provide safe Vol. 2, Issue 2 (May 2004), Article 3. migration corridors between spawning and rearing http://repositories.cdlib.org/jmie/sfews/vol2/iss2/art3 grounds as well as abundant high-quality brackish water rearing habitat. Key research needs are (1) to SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY & WATERSHED SCIENCE INTRODUCTION Such tests should provide an excellent opportunity for the application of adaptive management, a major The Sacramento splittail (Pogonichthys component of CALFED Ecosystem Restoration Plan macrolepidotus) is a cyprinid fish endemic to the (ERP) projects. Therefore an important purpose of this Central Valley of California with a range that centers paper is to provide background and guidance for the on the San Francisco Estuary (Map 1, 2). Until 2003, design of modeling and management experiments. it was listed as a threatened species by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and is considered to be a Species of Special Concern by the California HISTORY AND TAXONOMY Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). Therefore, managing processes and habitats in ways that favor Official History splittail is a high priority of the California Bay-Delta Splittail evolved in the Central Valley over millions of Authority’s (CALFED) Ecosystem Restoration Program years. They were harvested in small numbers by Native Plan (ERPP) and Multi-species Conservation Strategy. Americans for a few thousand years. Their formal his- The species is also a focus of various modeling efforts tory in relation to Western culture, however, does not to predict the impact of changing flow regimes on begin to be described until 1854 (Ayers 1854). The fol- native species. Therefore, the objectives of this paper lowing are milestones in their official history: are to: 1854 W. O. Ayres, a physician, formally describes, 1. Summarize what is known about the biology of in a San Francisco newspaper, Sacramento Sacramento splittail, including (a) history and tax- splittail as a new species based on fish pur- onomy, (b) distribution and abundance, and (c) chased from a local market. ecology and life history. 1908 C. Rutter finds splittail to be widespread in 2. Provide a conceptual model of splittail life history. the Central Valley, from the Sacramento River at Redding to the lower Merced River 3. List uncertainties in our knowledge of splittail, (Figure 1, Central Valley Map). expressed as a series of hypotheses. 1931 L. A. Walford describes splittail as being taken 4. Present a simulation model of splittail population in small numbers in commercial fisheries. dynamics to explore limiting factors, based on pres- ent knowledge. 1963-64 A 1-year CDFG survey captures 536 splittail in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and 5. Discuss potential effects of climate change and 291 in Suisun Bay (mostly adults). The study earthquakes on splittail. finds them to be common and widely dis- 6. Discuss management options. tributed but devotes only 10 lines of text to their biology in the published report (Turner The peer-reviewed literature on splittail is limited, so and Kelley 1966). this review depends heavily on unpublished data from various agency surveys, reports in the grey literature, 1973 J. Hopkirk describes the Clear Lake splittail and the on-going studies by three of the co-authors: as a separate species (P. ciscoides) but it is T. Sommer, R. Baxter, and P. Moyle. While an enor- apparently already extinct by the time the mous amount has been learned about splittail in the description is published. past few years, we are still in the hypothesis stage as 1974 M. Caywood finishes his M.S. thesis on split- to limiting factors, especially those related to human tail in the Delta, the first study of its life impacts on the San Francisco Estuary and its water- history, which remains unpublished. shed. Some of the key hypotheses relating to splittail management need to be tested with both hydrody- 1983 The first peer-reviewed life history study, namic models and large-scale field experiments con- based on splittail captured in Suisun Marsh, ducted in association with habitat restoration projects. is published (Daniels and Moyle 1983). Los Angeles Aqueduct Lake Tahoe Aqueduct r e v i R California . i n R u . oaq d J e n Lake c a Almanor S r ne R ne Folsom Lake e M Lake Oroville R. Cosumnes Tuolumne R. okelum Stanislaus R. Stanislaus M American R. American Feather River r Shasta e Lake v Sa Ri cramen to San Luis Reservoir SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY & WATERSHED SCIENCE Central Valley watershed of California. Map 1. SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY & WATERSHED SCIENCE RIVER AMERICAN Sacramento ss a yp B lo o Y Cosumnes R. NORTH BAY AQUEDUCT N Suisun P a e p Marsh r ta a e R iv lu Montezuma River Mokelumne R m iv Rio a e R r Suisun Vista • iv Marsh e Slough Salinity r Grizzly Control ento Bay Gates San Joaquin River San Pablo Honker Sacram Bay Bay Bay Sherman Suisun Island Chipps CANALIsland • Pittsburg Big Break • Antioch COSTA ✬ Stockton CONTRA Central San Francisco Bay Clifton Court Forebay Harvey O. Banks Delta Pumping Plant (SWP) Tracy Pumping San Francisco Plant (CVP) Pacific Ocean . s R au isl San Joaquin Rivern ta South S Bay Tu ol um n Riv e er N COYOTE CREEK Map 2. San Francisco Estuary and Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta of California. SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY & WATERSHED SCIENCE 1989 January. USFWS included splittail as a 1998 December. In response to a suit by Category 2 Candidate Species for possible Southwest Center for Biological Diversity, a listing as endangered or threatened (Annual federal court orders USFWS to take action Notice of Review 54 FR 554). on splittail listing. 1989 The splittail is listed as a Species of Special 1999 February. USFWS lists splittail as threatened Concern by CDFG (Moyle and others 1995). species (USFWS 1999). 1992 Status and Trends Report from San 2000 June. In response to a lawsuit by San Luis Francisco Estuary Project documents wide- and Delta-Mendota Water Authority, a feder- spread decline of native species in estuary, al court determines that the splittail listing is including splittail (Herbold and others 1992). not justified and orders the USFWS to reverse the listing. The legal status of the 1992 November. USFWS receives a petition from splittail remains under review. G. A. Thomas of the Natural Heritage Institute and eight co-petitioning organiza- 2001 January, May, August. Comment period for tions to list splittail under the Endangered listing of splittail as a threatened species re- Species Act and to designate critical habitat opened three times by USFWS. based on information eventually published in Meng and Moyle (1995) (Natural Heritage 2002 March, October. Comment period for listing Institute 1992).
Recommended publications
  • Tennessee Fish Species
    The Angler’s Guide To TennesseeIncluding Aquatic Nuisance SpeciesFish Published by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Cover photograph Paul Shaw Graphics Designer Raleigh Holtam Thanks to the TWRA Fisheries Staff for their review and contributions to this publication. Special thanks to those that provided pictures for use in this publication. Partial funding of this publication was provided by a grant from the United States Fish & Wildlife Service through the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Authorization No. 328898, 58,500 copies, January, 2012. This public document was promulgated at a cost of $.42 per copy. Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency is available to all persons without regard to their race, color, national origin, sex, age, dis- ability, or military service. TWRA is also an equal opportunity/equal access employer. Questions should be directed to TWRA, Human Resources Office, P.O. Box 40747, Nashville, TN 37204, (615) 781-6594 (TDD 781-6691), or to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office for Human Resources, 4401 N. Fairfax Dr., Arlington, VA 22203. Contents Introduction ...............................................................................1 About Fish ..................................................................................2 Black Bass ...................................................................................3 Crappie ........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to List the Clear Lake Hitch Under the Endangered Species
    Petition to List the Clear Lake Hitch (Lavinia exilicauda chi) As Endangered or Threatened Under the Endangered Species Act Submitted To: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office 2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2605 Sacramento, CA 95825 Secretary of the Interior Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20240 Submitted By: Center for Biological Diversity Date: September 25, 2012 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Center for Biological Diversity petitions the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to list the Clear Lake hitch (Lavinia exilicauda chi) as an endangered or threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act. The Clear Lake hitch is a fish species endemic to Clear Lake, California and its tributaries. A large minnow once so plentiful that it was a staple food for the original inhabitants of the Clear Lake region, the Clear Lake hitch has declined precipitously in abundance as the ecology of its namesake lake has been altered and degraded. Clear Lake hitch once spawned in all of the tributary streams to Clear Lake. The hitch life cycle involves migration each spring, when adults make their way upstream in tributaries of Clear Lake, spawning, and then return to Clear Lake. The biologically significant masses of hitch were a vital part of the Clear Lake ecosystem, an important food source for numerous birds, fish, and other wildlife. Hitch in “unimaginably abundant” numbers once clogged the lake’s tributaries during spectacular spawning runs. Historical accounts speak of “countless thousands” and “enormous” and “massive” numbers of hitch. The Clear Lake basin and its tributaries have been dramatically altered by urban development and agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Systematics of Western North American Cyprinids (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae)
    Zootaxa 3586: 281–303 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0EFA9728-D4BB-467E-A0E0-0DA89E7E30AD Molecular systematics of western North American cyprinids (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) SUSANA SCHÖNHUTH 1, DENNIS K. SHIOZAWA 2, THOMAS E. DOWLING 3 & RICHARD L. MAYDEN 1 1 Department of Biology, Saint Louis University, 3507 Laclede Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA. E-mail S.S: [email protected] ; E-mail RLM: [email protected] 2 Department of Biology and Curator of Fishes, Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 3 School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The phylogenetic or evolutionary relationships of species of Cypriniformes, as well as their classification, is in a era of flux. For the first time ever, the Order, and constituent Families are being examined for relationships within a phylogenetic context. Relevant findings as to sister-group relationships are largely being inferred from analyses of both mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Like the vast majority of Cypriniformes, due to an overall lack of any phylogenetic investigation of these fishes since Hennig’s transformation of the discipline, changes in hypotheses of relationships and a natural classification of the species should not be of surprise to anyone. Basically, for most taxa no properly supported phylogenetic hypothesis has ever been done; and this includes relationships with reasonable taxon and character sampling of even families and subfamilies.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    13.0 LITERATURE CIT TABLE OF CONTENTS 13.0 LITERATURE CITED AND PREPARATION STAFF ..................................................... 13-1 13.1 PREPARATION STAFF ............................................................................................ 13-1 13.1.1 Solano County Water Agency ........................................................................ 13-1 13.1.2 Plan Participants ............................................................................................. 13-1 13.1.3 LSA Associates, Inc. ...................................................................................... 13-1 13.2 LITERATURE CITED ............................................................................................... 13-2 ED AND PREPARATION S TAFF 13-i Oct 2012 This page intentionally left blank ND PREPARATION STAFF ED A 13.0 LITERATURE CIT Oct 2012 13-ii 13.0 LITERATURE CIT 13.0 LITERATURE CITED AND PREPARATION STAFF 13.1 PREPARATION STAFF 13.1.1 Solano County Water Agency General Manager: David Okita Supervising Environmental Scientist: Chris Lee ED AND PREPARATION S 13.1.2 Plan Participants • City of Dixon: ○ David Dowswell, ○ Justin Hardy ○ Rebecca Van Burren • City of Fairfield: Erin Beavers • City of Rio Vista: Tom Bland • City of Suisun City: ○ Gary Cullen TAFF ○ Jake Raper • City of Vacaville: ○ Fred Buderi ○ Scott Sexton • City of Vallejo: Brian Dolan • Dixon Resource Conservation District (Dixon RCD): John Currey • Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District (FSSD): Larry Bahr • Maine Prairie Water District (MPWD): Don Holdener
    [Show full text]
  • Cyprinidae: Pogonichthys Macrolepidotus) in a Managed Seasonal Floodplain Wetland
    UC Davis San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science Title Habitat Associations and Behavior of Adult and Juvenile Splittail (Cyprinidae: Pogonichthys macrolepidotus) in a Managed Seasonal Floodplain Wetland Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/85r15611 Journal San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 6(2) ISSN 1546-2366 Authors Sommer, Ted R. Harrell, William C. Matica, Zoltan et al. Publication Date 2008 DOI https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2008v6iss2art3 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California JUNE 2008 Habitat Associations and Behavior of Adult and Juvenile Splittail (Cyprinidae: Pogonichthys macrolepidotus) in a Managed Seasonal Floodplain Wetland Ted R. Sommer, California Department of Water Resources* William C. Harrell, California Department of Water Resources Zoltan Matica, California Department of Water Resources Frederick Feyrer, California Department of Water Resources *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT veys showed that early stages (mean 21-mm fork length [FL]) of young splittail produced in the wet- Although there is substantial information about the land were strongly associated with shallow areas benefits of managed seasonal wetlands to wildlife, lit- with shoreline emergent terrestrial vegetation and tle is known about whether this habitat can help sup- submerged aquatic vegetation, but moved offshore port “at risk” native fishes. The Sacramento splittail to deeper areas with tules and submerged terrestrial Pogonichthys macrolepidotus, a California Species of vegetation at night. Larger juveniles (mean 41-mm Special Concern, does not produce strong year classes FL) primarily used deeper, offshore habitats during unless it has access to floodplain wetlands of the San day and night.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Species List
    Appendix P List of Fish Species Found in the CHSJS Estuary 5-1 Species list of fishes, decapod crustaceans and bivalve molluscs collected from the CHSJS Estuary. Species are listed in phylogenetic order. Common name Scientific name Common name Scientific name Scallops Argopecten spp. Sand perch Diplectrum formosum Bay scallop Argopecten irradians Belted sandfish Serranus subligarius Eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica Sunfishes Lepomis spp. Pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus duorarum Redbreast sunfish Lepomis auritus Brackish grass shrimp Palaemonetes intermedius Bluegill Lepomis macrochirus Riverine grass shrimp Palaemonetes paludosus Dollar sunfish Lepomis marginatus Daggerblade grass shrimp Palaemonetes pugio Redear sunfish Lepomis microlophus Longtail grass shrimp Periclimenes longicaudatus Spotted sunfish Lepomis punctatus Florida grass shrimp Palaemon floridanus Largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides Snapping shrimp Alpheidae spp. Warmouth Lepomis gulosus Zostera shrimp Hippolyte zostericola Swamp darter Etheostoma fusiforme Peppermint shrimp Lysmata wurdemanni Bluefish Pomatomus saltatrix Rathbun cleaner shrimp Lysmata rathbunae Cobia Rachycentron canadum Arrow shrimp Tozeuma carolinense Live sharksucker Echeneis naucrates Squat grass shrimp Thor dobkini Whitefinsharksucker Echeneis neucratoides Night shrimp Ambidexter symmetricus Crevalle jack Caranx hippos Blue crab Callinectes sapidus Horse-eye jack Caranx latus Ornate blue crab Callinectes ornatus Atlantic bumper Chloroscombrus chrysurus Swimming crab Portunus spp. Leatherjack Oligoplites
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Locus Fossil-Calibrated Phylogeny of Atheriniformes (Teleostei, Ovalentaria)
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 86 (2015) 8–23 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Multi-locus fossil-calibrated phylogeny of Atheriniformes (Teleostei, Ovalentaria) Daniela Campanella a, Lily C. Hughes a, Peter J. Unmack b, Devin D. Bloom c, Kyle R. Piller d, ⇑ Guillermo Ortí a, a Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA b Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Australia c Department of Biology, Willamette University, Salem, OR, USA d Department of Biological Sciences, Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, LA, USA article info abstract Article history: Phylogenetic relationships among families within the order Atheriniformes have been difficult to resolve Received 29 December 2014 on the basis of morphological evidence. Molecular studies so far have been fragmentary and based on a Revised 21 February 2015 small number taxa and loci. In this study, we provide a new phylogenetic hypothesis based on sequence Accepted 2 March 2015 data collected for eight molecular markers for a representative sample of 103 atheriniform species, cover- Available online 10 March 2015 ing 2/3 of the genera in this order. The phylogeny is calibrated with six carefully chosen fossil taxa to pro- vide an explicit timeframe for the diversification of this group. Our results support the subdivision of Keywords: Atheriniformes into two suborders (Atherinopsoidei and Atherinoidei), the nesting of Notocheirinae Silverside fishes within Atherinopsidae, and the monophyly of tribe Menidiini, among others. We propose taxonomic Marine to freshwater transitions Marine dispersal changes for Atherinopsoidei, but a few weakly supported nodes in our phylogeny suggests that further Molecular markers study is necessary to support a revised taxonomy of Atherinoidei.
    [Show full text]
  • Macroinvertebrate Prey Availability and Fish Diet Selectivity in Relation
    Peer Reviewed Title: Macroinvertebrate Prey Availability and Fish Diet Selectivity in Relation to Environmental Variables in Natural and Restoring North San Francisco Bay Tidal Marsh Channels Journal Issue: San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 12(1) Author: Howe, Emily R., University of Washington Simenstad, Charles A., University of Washington Toft, Jason D., University of Washington Cordell, Jeffrey R., University of Washington Bollens, Stephen M., Washington State University Publication Date: 2014 Permalink: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/0p01q99s Acknowledgements: We wish to thank S. Avent, D. Gewant, S. Cohen, and members of the Wetland Ecosystem Team for their assistance in the field, J. Cordell, E. Armbrust, S. Heerhartz, A. Gray, and B. Riedesel for their laboratory assistance identifying benthic and neustonic macroinvertebrates, and to J. Breckenridge and D. Gewant for sharing environmental metrics generated for the study marsh sites. Funding was provided by the Bay-Delta CALFED program to C. A. Simenstad and S. M. Bollens. Author Bio: School of Aquatic and Fishery SciencesPost doctoral researcher School of Aquatic and Fishery SciencesResearch Professor School of Aquatic and Fishery SciencesResearch Scientist School of Aquatic and Fishery SciencesResearch Scientist School of the EnvironmentDirector, Professor Keywords: Tidal marsh, macroinvertebrate ecology, fish ecology, estuarine ecology, community composition, tidal marsh restoration, San Francisco estuary, Ecology, Fisheries eScholarship provides open access, scholarly publishing services to the University of California and delivers a dynamic research platform to scholars worldwide. Local Identifier: jmie_sfews_17062 Abstract: Tidal marsh wetlands provide important foraging habitat for a variety of estuarine fishes. Prey organisms include benthic–epibenthic macroinvertebrates, neustonic arthropods, and zooplankton. Little is known about the abundance and distribution of interior marsh macroinvertebrate communities in the San Francisco Estuary (estuary).
    [Show full text]
  • Suisun Marsh Fish Report 2011 Final.Pdf
    SUISUN MARSH FISH STUDY Trends in Fish and Invertebrate Populations of Suisun Marsh January 2011 - December 2011 Annual Report for the California Department of Water Resources Sacramento, California Teejay A. O'Rear and Peter B. Moyle Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology University of California, Davis July 2012 SUMMARY Suisun Marsh, at the geographic center of the San Francisco Estuary, is important habitat for introduced and native fishes. With funding from the California Department of Water Resources (DWR), the University of California, Davis, Suisun Marsh Fish Study has systematically monitored the marsh's fish populations since 1980. The purpose of the study has been to determine the environmental factors affecting fish abundance and distribution within the context of evolving water management. In 2011, we conducted 259 otter trawls and 74 beach seines. Our catches of plankton- feeding macroinvertebrates and fishes were strongly influenced by the interaction of high Delta outflows, low salinities, and the cold winter and spring. The prolonged low salinities severely reduced the population of overbite clams (Potamocorbula amurensis) in the southwest marsh, in addition to delaying the appearance of Black Sea jellyfish (Maeotias marginata) medusae until very late in the year. Species that ultimately benefit from high flows for spawning, due to either increased floodplain inundation [e.g., Sacramento splittail (Pogonichthys macrolepidotus)] or reduced salinities [e.g., white catfish (Ameiurus catus)], recruited to the marsh in high numbers. Additionally, delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus) reached their highest abundance in the marsh since 2001, which was likely due to the combination of (1) high flows both reducing entrainment and promoting plankton blooms, (2) colder water during spring creating more favorable spawning conditions, and (3) appropriate temperatures and salinities occurring in the marsh during autumn.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Suisun Marsh Fish Report 2018 Final.Pdf
    Trends in Fish and Invertebrate Populations of Suisun Marsh January 2018 - December 2018 Annual Report for the California Department of Water Resources Sacramento, California Teejay A. O'Rear*, Peter B. Moyle, and John R. Durand Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology Center for Watershed Sciences University of California, Davis October 2020 *Corresponding author: [email protected] SUMMARY Suisun Marsh, at the geographic center of the northern San Francisco Estuary, is important habitat for native and non-native fishes. The University of California, Davis, Suisun Marsh Fish Study, in partnership with the California Department of Water Resources (DWR), has systematically monitored the marsh's fish populations since January 1980. The study’s main purpose has been to determine environmental and anthropogenic factors affecting fish distribution and abundance. Abiotic conditions in Suisun Marsh during calendar-year 2018 returned to fairly typical levels following the very wet year of 2017. Delta outflow was generally low, with higher-than- average outflows only occurring in April when Yolo Bypass flooded. Salinities in 2018 were about average, in part because of Suisun Marsh Salinity Control Gates operations in late summer. Water temperatures were mild, being higher than average in winter and autumn and slightly below average during summer. Water transparencies were typical in winter and spring but, as has become a pattern since the early 2000s, were higher than average in summer and autumn. Dissolved-oxygen concentrations were consistent throughout the year, with only two instances of low values being recorded, both in dead-end sloughs. Fish and invertebrate catches in Suisun Marsh in 2018 told two main stories: (1) many fishes benefit from higher flows and lower salinities in Suisun Marsh while some invasive invertebrates do not; and (2) Suisun Marsh is disproportionately valuable to fishes of conservation importance.
    [Show full text]