Envision-Kermit-Plan-DRAFT-August
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The project team is grateful for the contributions of the residents of Kermit, Texas who gave their time, ideas, and expertise for the cre- ation of this plan. It is only with their assistance and direction that this plan gained the necessary depth to truly represent the spirit of the community, and it is with their commitment that the plan will be implemented. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL STEERING COMMITTEE Jerry Phillips – Mayor Yvette Trevino – West Texas State Bank Bobby Slaughter – Council Member District 4 Laura Snyder – Shell Oil Norma Hernandez – Council Member District 5 Julio Pena – Citizen Connie Carpenter – Citizen CONSULTING TEAM CITY STAFF Denise Shetter – KISD RDG PLANNING & DESIGN Gabe Espino – KISD Omaha and Des Moines Frankie Davis – City Manager Oscar Pena – Citizen www.RDGUSA.com Diana Franco – City Secretary Greg Edwards – HiCrush Sylvester Alarcon – Assistant Public Works Director John Leavitt – Winkler County Golf Course Jaime Dutton – Chief of Police Shawna Doran – WesTex Community Credit Union Amy Haase, AICP Stephanie Rouse, AICP TABLE of CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 6 CHAPTER 1: DISCOVER KERMIT 9 CHAPTER 2: GUIDING PRINCIPLES 21 Foundation CHAPTER 3: LAND USE 25 CHAPTER 4: HOUSING 51 CHAPTER 5: TRANSPORTATION 63 CHAPTER 6: PARKS 79 CHAPTER 7: COMMUNITY PRIDE 91 Elements CHAPTER 8: DOWNTOWN 99 CHAPTER 9: PUBLIC FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE 109 Next Steps CHAPTER 10: IMPLEMENTATION 123 CHAPTER 1 DISCOVER KERMIT WHY PLAN? TO CRAFT A SHARED VISION FOR A JOINT LEGAL BASIS FOR LAND USE REGULATIONS FUTURE In 1997, the Texas Legislature added Chapter establish the rules that govern how land is used 213 to the Local Government Code which allows and developed within the municipality and its ex- The Envision Kermit Plan is simply a road map to all municipalities in Texas to develop and adopt traterritorial jurisdiction. Therefore, the plan cre- help Kermit most efficiently navigate to its best comprehensive plans on an optional basis. The ates a vision for how the community should de- future. Change is not new to Kermit which has statute requires at a minimum that a comprehen- velop and must therefore be used to by elected seen both tremendous growth and decline re- sive plan address land use, transportation and and appointed officials when making land use flective of the local oil economy. This reality ne- public facilities, establish procedures for adop- decisions. cessitates consideration of what the future of tion and amendment, and requires a statement Kermit should look like. In times of growth it is distinguishing between land use plans and zon- easy to move forward in a rush, but the Envision ing regulations. Kermit Plan affords community members the op- portunity to step back and look at the direction GUIDANCE FOR DECISION MAKERS in which their community is going. Plans may and should go beyond these basic First, the plan provides the legal basis for land minimum standards in order to accurately and use regulations such as zoning and subdivision comprehensively plan for the future of the com- regulations. Second, a modern comprehensive munity. Land use regulations, such as zoning or- plan presents a unified and compelling vision for dinances, recognize that people live coopera- the community, built from the aspirations of its tively within their community and have certain citizens, with recommended actions to accom- responsibilities to one another. These regulations plish that vision. 6 ENVISION KERMIT CHAPTER 1 DISCOVER KERMIT NAVIGATING THE PLAN GUIDING ELEMENTS The Envision Kermit Plan is designed as a rallying DISCOVER IMPLEMENTATION A review of the public PRINCIPLES The structure of the plan An ongoing process that uses point around the community’s vision for the fu- engagement process and is organized around six The principles of the and updates the plan. strategic elements, each trends indicated by previous plan emerged through ture, the actions necessary to make that future a providing goals and initiatives plans, reports, and studies. the public engagement for public policy. reality, and how to get involved. As such, the plan process, and established the desirable conditions for is written to educate the reader on the basics Kermit’s future. of land and community development, articulate the vision and recommendations for Kermit, and provide an implementation framework to iden- tify priorities, partnerships, and potential funding mechanism. The plan is organized as follows: CHAPTER 1: DISCOVER KERMIT CHAPTERS 4 - 9: ELEMENTS A review of existing conditions with special at- These six elements provide detailed guidance tention to demographic, population, and eco- on key topic areas that contribute to the health nomic trends. Results of the community en- and function of the city and will make the vision gagement done throughout the process are also a reality. included. » Housing » Community Pride CHAPTER 2: GUIDING PRINCIPLES » Transportation » Downtown Envision Kermit is built upon guiding principles » Parks and » Public Facilities and developed from public engagement and review Recreation Infrastructure of the data in Chapter 1. CHAPTER 10: IMPLEMENTATION CHAPTER 3: LAND USE A guide on exactly how to begin implementing the plan including priorities, partnerships, and A framework for the physical development of the funding mechanisms. community with respect to existing neighbor- hoods and business districts, the transportation system (existing and future), and the creation of amenity nodes. ENVISION KERMIT 7 CHAPTER 1 DISCOVER KERMIT 8 ENVISION KERMIT CHAPTER DISCOVER 1KERMIT This chapter includes a summary of input from the Steering Committee, residents, students, and city staff. In addition, a deep dive into the historic and current population trends, economic data, and commuting patterns will help inform the elements in Chapters 4 through 9. KERMIT TODAY: ANALYSIS OF TRENDS MAJOR THEMES POPULATION HISTORY AND CHARACTERISTICS » Kermit experienced a declining population until 2010 when population growth spiked To better understand the city’s future population dynamics it is important to look at historic to 12.2% trends. Kermit saw rapid rates of growth from 1940 through 1960, jumping from a small commu- nity of 2,584 to its peak population of 10,465 residents. After 1960 however, the community has An increasing number of residents » struggled to maintain population, seeing decline in almost every decade until 2010. Estimates from identified as Caucasian (87.4%) with 63% of 2017 show a population nearing the levels seen in 1990. Despite the decline, Kermit has continued the population identified as Hispanic to hold a large share of the Winkler County population, remaining constant at approximately 80% » Median household incomes are rising, but since 1970. unlike national trends where incomes rise with age, Kermit residents between 25 and POPULATION 44 years of age make significantly more » The economic boom has driving up the population in Kermit since the 2010 Census. The than those 45 to 64 American Community Survey estimated the 2017 population to be 6,405 people, however » Kermit has a shortage of workers, with a using current water hook-up data from January 2019 and an average people per household of very low unemployment rate 3.5 a better estimate of the current population is 7,756 people. » The workforce commutes from all over the » Kermit’s population declined by 38% from 1990 to 2010, a loss of 4,060 residents. region, but 45% reside in Kermit » From 2010 to 2017 the population grew by a total of 697 residents or 12.2%, the greatest increase seen since the 1960's. HISTORIC POPULATION CHANGE 1960-2017 11,000 10,465 10,000 9,000 8,000 8,015 7,884 Number of of Residents Number 7,000 6,875 6,405 6,000 5,714 5,708 5,000 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2017 CHAPTER 1 DISCOVER KERMIT 1500 STUDENT ENROLLMENT 2013-2019 » Student enrollment numbers show the highest levels of enrollment since 2013, with 1480 a dip in levels taking place in the 2016-2017 school year. Total enrollment for the 2018- 1460 2019 school year was 1,485 students. » During the period when the population loss 1440 halted (2000 and 2010) the population under the age of 15 grew the most, reflecting a 1420 higher birth rate than predicted. Interestingly, an out-migration of residents between 20 Number ofStudents 1400 and 34 years of age occurred, the typical demographic that starts families. 1380 » The predicted versus actual 2017 population showed higher birth rates. Population growth 1360 of those under 15 was support by the greater than predicted number of 25 to 44 year old's. RACE AND ETHNICITY 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 » Most residents in 2010 identified as Caucasian (70.8%) with a high rate of residents identifying as some other race (22.3%). In 2017, the percentage of Caucasian PREDICTED VS. ACTUAL POPULATION residents rose to 87.4% with 4.1% identifying as Black or African American. 1,800 +356 1,600 » In 2010, 58.6% of the population identified as 1,400 Hispanic, rising to 63% in 2017. 1,200 1,000 +148 +65 +26 800 +154 -39 600 -9 -54 400 -55 200 +39 0 0-15 15-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+ 2017 Predicted 2017 Actual ENVISION KERMIT 11 CHAPTER 1 DISCOVER KERMIT ECONOMIC FACTORS » Median household income rose by $6,259 between 2010 and 2017, but was still Kermit’s economy has experienced strong outpaced by Odessa, which grew by an growth over the past decade, with declining un- additional $13,638. employment and increasing household incomes. The number of jobs continues to increase, pro- » Median income is $8,306 higher for viding opportunities for attracting new residents. households of Hispanic or Latino origin than those identifying as white alone. INCOME » Households between 25 and 44 years old make over $25,000 more per year than those Figure 1.1 describes the income distribution for between the ages of 45 and 64.