DOCSLIB.ORG

Folder: 13-11-HR Haldeman

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Folder: 13-11-HR Haldeman Richard Nixon Presidential Library Contested Materials Collection Folder List Box Number Folder Number Document Date No Date Subject Document Type Document Description 13 11 4/27/1972Campaign Memo From Strachan to Haldeman RE: Gallup Surveys. 2 pgs. 13 11 4/26/1972Campaign Memo From Strachan to Haldeman RE: Campaign Meetings. 5 pgs. 13 11 4/25/1972Campaign Memo From Strachan to Haldeman RE: Massachusetts and Pennsylvania Primary Returns. 3 pgs. 13 11 4/17/1972Campaign Memo From Strachan to Haldeman RE: Meeting with John Mitchell and Bob Teeter - April 17, 1972. 2 pgs. Wednesday, May 06, 2015 Page 1 of 4 Box Number Folder Number Document Date No Date Subject Document Type Document Description 13 11 4/17/1972White House Staff Memo From Strachan to Haldeman RE: Charlie McWhorter. 1 pg. 13 11 4/15/1972Campaign Memo From Strachan to Haldeman RE: RNC Convention. 1 pg. 13 11 4/13/1972Campaign Memo From Strachan to Haldeman RE: San Diego RNC Convention. 1 pg. 13 11 4/12/1972Campaign Memo From Strachan to Haldeman RE: Announcement of John Mitchell as Campaign Director. 1 pg. 13 11 4/12/1972Personal Memo From Strachan to Haldeman RE: President's Papers and Estate Plan. 2 pgs. Wednesday, May 06, 2015 Page 2 of 4 Box Number Folder Number Document Date No Date Subject Document Type Document Description 13 11 4/10/1972Personal Memo From DeMarco to Dean RE: RMN Estate Plan - Need for Immediate "Stop-gap" Will. 2 pgs. 13 11 4/12/1972Campaign Memo From Strachan to Haldeman RE: Gallup Surveys. 1 pg. 13 11 4/7/1972Campaign Memo From Strachan to Haldeman RE: Gallup Popularity and Trial Heat Figures. 4 pgs. 13 11 4/6/1972White House Staff Memo From Strachan to Haldeman RE: Names for 350. 1 pg. 13 11 4/4/1972Campaign Memo From Strachan to Haldeman RE: Wisconsin Primary Returns. 4 pgs. Wednesday, May 06, 2015 Page 3 of 4 Box Number Folder Number Document Date No Date Subject Document Type Document Description 13 11 4/3/1972Personal Memo From Strachan to Haldeman RE: George Elkins Company. 1 pg. 13 11 4/3/1972Campaign Memo From Strachan to Haldeman RE: Democratic Candidates in California Primary. 1 pg. Wednesday, May 06, 2015 Page 4 of 4 Presidential Materials Review Board Review on Contested Documents Collection: H. R. Haldeman Box Number: 237 Folder: Strachan Chron-HRH only April 1972 Book I Document Disposition 134 Retain Open 135 Retain Open 136 Retain Open 137 Retain Open 138 Return Private/Political ~Y'tIO S\Y'Ct.(!:~(ti'\ m ~B 14 '-\ \:).11 1 ~ 139 Retain Open 140 Retain Open 141 Retain Open , , \ r. 142 Return Private/Political 1\\t'{Y\O 'St<-uch:' 'j to 't4 143 Return Private/Personal l\l\c.\'Vd) S~C<.(~~!c'}/\ +0 Jl~H 1.11 144 Retain Open 145 Return .1"'1 I' e,l_,>,"'- \1~'e 146 Retain Open 147 Retain Open 148 Retain Open 149 Retain Open 150 Retain Open 151 Retain Open 152 Return Private/Political t-.\..c'N\O ,::::>~(.o...I ~'\CV\'\ ~ ~t:u.~ 1..111111d­ 153 Return Private/Political N\eA'l'lo S~(.;.(kt,\ 11) t-\-tJ"H ~d 1'1 \1.;­ 154 Return Private/Political \'t\cI'I'J) St'!'c.\.d"Y:u' \o.t+RH '-1\1 i 155 Retain Open 156 Return Private/Political \'.lUlVd) '~k~ ft·:,; 111~,~\'. \./','1")1).. 157 Retain Close Invasion of Privacy 1\\..H'Y'..u ':)\1 0.(' ,',!t" '" 1-1-,\, "" I ..../ Presidential Materials Review Board Review on contested Documents Collection: H. R. Haldeman Box Number: 237 158 Return Private/Political \\/,,::,.,'0 159 Return Private/Personal i¥\cvy\() 160 Return Private/Political \V\t 'f\\() 161 Retain Open 162 Retain Open 163 Retain Open 164 Return Private/Political \Yu'(\'l() 165 Retain Open 166 Return Private/Political \Y'V,,\"\'~ v 167 Retain Open 168 Retain Open y 1,-1/ '1;j­ , ro t-\RH 169 Return Private/Political \v~w,o h'! ',' (D t-+-i~ r\ y J;3 ! ~i;;' 170 Return Private/Personal {Yurf\(l 4 tC.l t-\- }¢­ 171 Return Private/Political \Y\C'1 , c (~"CLn r-n+ I..II~; RICHARD NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL RECORD DOCUMENT DOCUMENT SUBJECTfTlTLE OR CORRESPONDENTS DATE RESTRICTION NUMBER TYPE 1 Memo Strachan to Haldeman re: Maryland 04/26/1972 G I ncome Taxes. 1 pg COLLECTION TITLE BOX NUMBER Contested Documents 10 FOLDER TITLE WHSF: SMOF: H.R. Haldeman: Strachan Chron - HRH Only April 1972 Book I Box 237 PRMPA RESTRICTION CODES: A, Release would violate a Federal statute or Agency Policy, E, Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or B, National security classified information, financial information, C, Pending or approved claim that release would violate an individual's F, Release would disclose investigatory information compiled for law rights, enforcement purposes, D, Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy G, Withdrawn and return private and personal material. or a libel of a living person, H, Withdrawn and returned non·historical material. DEED OF GIFT RESTRICTION CODES: D·DOG Personal privacy under deed of gift NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION 'U S, GPO; 1989·235·064/00024 NA 14021 (4-86) April 27/J 1972 MEMORANDUM FORz H. R. HALDEMAN FROM, GORDON STRACHAN SUBJECTs Gallup SurveyII MI'. &ad Mrll. John Davie. joined me for lunch in the Whit. Houae M ••s today with Jolm Scali and Ham Dent. The dhcu.alon developed ••verat matters of interest: 1) The Gallup trial heata teattns the Pl"ealdent asamat Humphrey Kennedy and McGovern rev.aled the foUbving "approximate" fil'h'.a: Nixon Hwn~reI Wallac. N.O. G-Apt" 22... 23 46 35 12 7 Nlxoa Kenne!!I Wallace N.O. 46 35 14 S Nt.OD. McGovern Wallace N.O. 47 31 12 10 No rel•••• d.te baa been set: Z) In the Well Street JO\1.l'Jlal on M.onday, May 1, th.re will b. a lead arUcle OA Kennedy baaed on a au.rvey conducted by !tone ot Gallup's aftU1a~a." The ardel. will ~te that in .pite of the very high awar....a of Chapplqw.dic:k (95*'-) more people are forgiving Kennedy ae dme goea by. Women more eaally forgive Kennedy for hia actionll thea men. Gallup has been under extreme pre.sure not to conduc:t it. Chappiquidtck Amdveraary poll this yeal'. ,R. W • .Apple and Tom Wicker have been e.pecially inalatent in trying to get Gallup not to conduct the poll this y.ar~ 3) Gallup is currently conducting an "image" study of all the Democratic caD.didate. and Pre.ident Nixon. Several of the questionl will focul on aineerity. tl"uthfuln••• and experience. The raault. will be avaUable aboat one month from now; 4) Daviea bellev•• that the amne.ty que.tiOD. 18 analOSOtU to bu••inlln the a...e that very few (1••• th.aa US) favor amDe.toy. Davi•• bellev.a that it could become anUnportaDt vot...,.tttaa 1••a {Ol" tha PJoealdent, e.ped.a11y in U,ht of MeGove:ra'a poaUlon; 5) Th. Pre,lel_tla baale appJ'ovallevel of aroand 50'f0 pub him in a. atroDl po.iUon fol' r .....l.ctloG. The...e hal not betm the 8roaloo all other Pre.identa have .1Ilfered. The PJoe.ldeat'. pabUe I'elatiou opentloll hal _.viMeeI the people that hi. vte... corre.pond with their. thereby 1l.,.tUac the il'Opol'taAc. 01. charbma; 6) Davie. b.u",., Gallup" Wlp\lW'b.4td I'....rch .how. that the I'lr.t Lady II probably W. atr0Alelt UDUpped ....O\I.rc.. Sh. b mol'. vaiu.bl. than any Vlee Pl-••lde:Dtlall'UDDf.n, mate. Sh. haa em.rleel after the Afriea aacl Chtaa trip', t ?, McGovern • Rpport b weaka. tkaa the 15 polat poMtion below the P:r••ld_t ladlea..e 'beeau•• hi, poKey atanda al'. '0 out 01. toach with the Americaa people; 8) 111 dilCWJ.IOll. aboat the I'Het HaUap bomblq q....UOD." Seall made .ev.ra! IAlII".on. to Da..t•• 1'".1'&, follow-up q9t.tioa. OIl the iJlva,tOll. doml.aoe t.IMory aad aee..ml,alOll.'. Dttvt•• , ..med receptive aa4 1 wl11 prepare queadoll' for your :revi..... to .ead to blm. 9) Davte••X'pl"e••e4 aom_ cOilcem a'bout the political ....0Il aad the iIlerea." preenr. for lnfol'matioa by Dem.ocftU aDd ••pu'b11c&Jl8. I a'8111'M him that I woald coatin.e to be Id. oaty CODtact at the White Hou...... that iDlonnation ..oul. be kept v-n c10'.. He ..emed ple.eed. aad invlted. mAl to Priae.toD to m4Mt OttO"'_ Oallup, Jr. and to _miDe tIleil" IacUUl... He a.ked. me to ...,. kello to Doa aum.f.lel beeau.•• he wa. 0.0••• Gan"pl. ela••mate at Prine.toIl ....d an 01. friend.. ADMINISTRATXVELY CONFIDENTIAL w April 26, 1972 MEMORANDUM FOR: H. R. ltALDEMAN FROM: OORDON STRACHAN SUBJECT: Maqruder proposea a new campaign .~ra~egy meeeing to Mitchell in the memorandum attached at Tab A. M! tahell has approved the meetinq and par1:,1clpanta (Miller, Magruder, LaRue, Marik. Dailey, Teeter, Pinkalateln). The first meeting will be this week on Key Stat... There 1s currently no agreement on Key Statea within the Committee to Re-Elec~ the President, .s Maqruder's memorandum a~tached at Tab B indicAtes. In liqht ot the importance of ,ettin9 Mitchell'. views on Key States and campaign atrateqy for you, I aalted Maqruder if I could attend. Maqruder s.id be was oppottad and would not. raiae the question of my attendance with Mitchell.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A List of the Records That Petitioners Seek Is Attached to the Petition, Filed Concurrently Herewith
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE PETITION OF STANLEY KUTLER, ) AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION, ) AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR LEGAL HISTORY, ) Miscellaneous Action No. ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN HISTORIANS, ) and SOCIETY OF AMERICAN ARCHIVISTS. ) ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR ORDER DIRECTING RELEASE OF TRANSCRIPT OF RICHARD M. NIXON’S GRAND JURY TESTIMONY OF JUNE 23-24, 1975, AND ASSOCIATED MATERIALS OF THE WATERGATE SPECIAL PROSECUTION FORCE Professor Stanley Kutler, the American Historical Association, the American Society for Legal History, the Organization of American Historians, and the Society of American Archivists petition this Court for an order directing the release of President Richard M. Nixon’s thirty-five-year- old grand jury testimony and associated materials of the Watergate Special Prosecution Force.1 On June 23-24, 1975, President Nixon testified before two members of a federal grand jury who had traveled from Washington, DC, to San Clemente, California. The testimony was then presented in Washington, DC, to the full grand jury that had been convened to investigate political espionage, illegal campaign contributions, and other wrongdoing falling under the umbrella term Watergate. Watergate was the defining event of Richard Nixon’s presidency. In the early 1970s, as the Vietnam War raged and the civil rights movement in the United States continued its momentum, the Watergate scandal ignited a crisis of confidence in government leadership and a constitutional crisis that tested the limits of executive power and the mettle of the democratic process. “Watergate” was 1A list of the records that petitioners seek is attached to the Petition, filed concurrently herewith.
    [Show full text]
  • John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan Pacific Cgem Orge School of Law
    University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship 2010 The akM ing of the Attorney General: John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan Pacific cGeM orge School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/facultyarticles Part of the Legal Biography Commons, and the President/Executive Department Commons Recommended Citation 41 McGeorge L. Rev. 311 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Book Review Essay The Making of the Attorney General: John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan* I. INTRODUCTION Shortly after I resigned my position as General Counsel of the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department in 1971, I was startled to receive a two-page letter from Attorney General John Mitchell. I was not a Department of Justice employee, and Mitchell's acquaintance with me was largely second-hand. The contents were surprising. Mitchell generously lauded my rather modest role "in developing an effective and professional law enforcement program for the District of Columbia." Beyond this, he added, "Your thoughtful suggestions have been of considerable help to me and my colleagues at the Department of Justice." The salutation was, "Dear Jerry," and the signature, "John." I was elated. I framed the letter and hung it in my office.
    [Show full text]
  • Nixon - Papers Access Authorizations (2)” of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 28, folder “Nixon - Papers Access Authorizations (2)” of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 28 of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library J ' WASHif'JGTO:>J August 1, l97L1: JvlEMORANDUM FOR: H. STUART KNIGHT DIRECTOR OF SECRET SERVICE / FROM: GEOFFREY S:E-IEPARD~>. - SUBJECT: Access to Files This is to authorize Mr. George Williams to have access to the files of Mr. H. R. Haldern.c.n in Room 522 of the Executive Office "Building for the purpose of searching for documents subpoenaed by the Special Prosecutor. / .• THE \VH!TE HOUS2: WAShiNGTON August 6, 1974 MElvf.ORi\::\D 'J.Nl FOR: H. STUART Y>-L'41GHT DIRECTOR OF SECRET SERVICE FROM: GEOFFREYSHEPAF~~~ SUBJECT: Access to Files This is to authorize Mr. George Williams to have access to the files of Mr. John Dean in Room 84 and Room 522 of the Executive Oiiice Building for the purpose of searching for documents subpoenaed by the Special Prosecutor.
    [Show full text]
  • WSPF Prosecutor (Neal)
    ¯ Ii,55-= CLOSING ARGUMENT ON BEHALF OF THE G°VERNMENT 3) MR. NEAL: Ladies and gentlemen!~°f the jury, may it please the court: After twelve weeks you know who I am. I do stand up to represent the United States of America- I have done it many times, I always do it with pride; and at the same time, a sense of not quite being as competent as the man who representS his country should be. I feel that way in this case particularly because of the array of fine legal talent representing the DefendantS- They are all excellent and capable lawyers,.I am sure you have seen that, and I congratulate them on their effortS in this lawsuit- In the course of this argument, I will refer to the DefendantS as Mitchell, Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Mardian, and Parkinson- I don’t mean any lack of respect, I respect every being. I leave off the Mister simply to save time and try to move on with the argument- I want it clear that what I say up here is not eviden( It is not evidence of anything" It is an argument based on the Government’S contention as to the evidence- If I inadvertently, and it wil! be inadvertently, say anything that in your mind is not in the record, you have not heard from the witness stand here or you have seen as an exhibl then "it will be inadvertent and your recollection of what the 11,556 evidence is must pertain. Now, I am sure defense counsel, when they.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents (Click on Index Item to Locate)
    Contents (Click on index item to locate) Subject Page Foreword iii Introductory Note xi Statement of Information 1 Statement of Information and Supporting Evidence 69 As-- ~~ on y 35 780 0 STATEMENT O19 INFORMATION H E A R I N G S BEFORE THE COMMITTEE OWN THE JUDICIARY HOI:TSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NINETY-THIRD CONGRESS SECOND SESSION PIJR61JANT TO H. Res. 803 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY TO INVESTIGATE WHETHER SUFFICIENT GROUNDS EXIST FOR THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO EXERCISE ITS CONSTITUTIONAL POWER TO IMPEACH RICHARD M. NIXON PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BOOK II EVENTS FOLLOWING THE WATERGATE BREAK-IN June 17,1972-February 9,1973 MAY—JUNE 1974 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1974 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. Price $6.10. COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY PETER W. RODINO, JO., New Jersey, Chairman HAROLD D. DONOHUE, Massachusetts EDWARD HUTCHINSON, Michigan JACK BROOKS, Texas ROBERT MCeLORY, Illinois ROBERT W. KASTENMEIER, Wisconsin HENRY P. SMITH III, New York DON EDWARDS, California CHARLES W. SANDMAN, Jo., New Jersey WILLIAM L. HUNGATE, Missouri ~~A. JOHN CONFERS, JR., Michigan JOSHUA EILBERG, Pennsylvania JEROME R. WALDIE, California WALTER FLOWERS, Alabama JAMES R. MANN, South Carolina PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland JOHN F. SEIBERLING, Ohio GEORGE E. DANIELSON, California ROBERT F. DRINAN, Massaehusetts CHARLES B. RANGEL, New York BARBARA JORDAN, Texas RAY THORNTON, Arkansas ELIZABETH HOLTZMAN, New York WAYNE OWENS, Utah EDWARD MEZVINSRY, Iowa TOM RAILS BACK, Illinois CHARLES E. WIGGINS, California DAVID W. DENNIS, Indiana HAMILTON FISH, JH., New York WILEY MAYNE, Iowa LAWRENCE J.
    [Show full text]
  • The President's Conservatives: Richard Nixon and the American Conservative Movement
    ALL THE PRESIDENT'S CONSERVATIVES: RICHARD NIXON AND THE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE MOVEMENT. David Sarias Rodriguez Department of History University of Sheffield Submitted for the degree of PhD October 2010 ABSTRACT This doctoral dissertation exammes the relationship between the American conservative movement and Richard Nixon between the late 1940s and the Watergate scandal, with a particular emphasis on the latter's presidency. It complements the sizeable bodies ofliterature about both Nixon himself and American conservatism, shedding new light on the former's role in the collapse of the post-1945 liberal consensus. This thesis emphasises the part played by Nixon in the slow march of American conservatism from the political margins in the immediate post-war years to the centre of national politics by the late 1960s. The American conservative movement is treated as a diverse epistemic community made up of six distinct sub-groupings - National Review conservatives, Southern conservatives, classical liberals, neoconservatives, American Enterprise Institute conservatives and the 'Young Turks' of the New Right - which, although philosophically and behaviourally autonomous, remained intimately associated under the overall leadership of the intellectuals who operated from the National Review. Although for nearly three decades Richard Nixon and American conservatives endured each other in a mutually frustrating and yet seemingly unbreakable relationship, Nixon never became a fully-fledged member of the movement. Yet, from the days of Alger Hiss to those of the' Silent Majority', he remained the political actor best able to articulate and manipulate the conservative canon into a populist, electorally successful message. During his presidency, the administration's behaviour played a crucial role - even if not always deliberately - in the momentous transformation of the conservative movement into a more diverse, better-organised, modernised and more efficient political force.
    [Show full text]
  • F:\Nixon -- Move to Former Staff on 9.2\Declarations
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE PETITION OF STANLEY KUTLER, ) AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION, ) AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR LEGAL HISTORY, ) Miscellaneous Action No. ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN HISTORIANS, ) and SOCIETY OF AMERICAN ARCHIVISTS. ) ___________________________________________) DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR ORDER DIRECTING RELEASE OF TRANSCRIPT OF RICHARD M. NIXON’S GRAND JURY TESTIMONY OF JUNE 23-24, 1975, AND ASSOCIATED MATERIALS OF THE WATERGATE SPECIAL PROSECUTION FORCE Allison M. Zieve (D.C. Bar No. 424786) Michael T. Kirkpatrick (D.C. Bar No. 486293 Public Citizen Litigation Group 1600 20th Street NW Washington, DC 20009 (202) 588-1000 Counsel for Petitioners TABLE OF CONTENTS Tab Declaration of Stanley Kutler.................................................... A Declaration of Julian Helisek (including exhibits) ................................... B Declaration of Richard J. Davis .................................................. C Declaration of John W. Dean III ................................................. D Declaration of David M. Dorsen ................................................. E Declaration of Mark Feldstein ................................................... F Declaration of Don Fulsom ..................................................... G Declaration of David Greenberg ................................................. H Declaration of Kenneth J. Hughes, Jr. .............................................. I Declaration of Thomas Long ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NFS Form 10-900 (Rev. 11-90) Y5&2&\ \Opafto.l0024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties or districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to compete all items. 1. Name of Property______________________________________________ Historic name: Watergate______________________________________________ Other names/site number:_________________________________________________ 2. T vocation____________________________________________________ Street fc Number 2500^ 7.6003 2650. 7.600 Virginia Avemie3 N.W.; 6003 700 New Hampshire Avenue., N.W.__________________________________[ ] Not for Publication_____ City or town: Washington_____________________[ ] Vicinity___________________ State: DC________Code- 001 County_________Code:______Zip Code: 20037______ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification__________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Nixon Presidential Returned Materials Collection White House Central Files (WHCF)
    Nixon Presidential Returned Materials Collection White House Central Files (WHCF) Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum National Archives and Records Administration Processed by Nixon Presidential Materials Staff, Yorba Linda, California, 2007 Contact Information Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum ATTN: Archives 18001 Yorba Linda Boulevard Yorba Linda, California 92886 Phone: (714) 993-5075 Fax: (714) 528-0544 E-mail: [email protected] 2 Table Of Contents Descriptive Summary [pg 3] Administrative Information [pg 3] Administrative History [pg 4] Scope and Content Summary [pg 5] Folder Title List [pg 7] 3 Descriptive Summary Title: Nixon Presidential Returned Materials Collection: White House Central Files (WHCF) Creator: Office of the White House Central Files National Archives and Records Administration Extent: 101 boxes, Approximately 43 Linear Feet Repository: Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum 18001 Yorba Linda Boulevard Yorba Linda, California 92886 Abstract: The Nixon Presidential Returned Materials Collection: White House Central Files consist of materials returned to the estate of former President Richard Nixon by archivists from the Nixon Presidential Materials Project. The archivists considered certain documents to be ‘Returnable’ to the Nixon estate if the subject matter of the documents were viewed as personal or personal/political. The Nixon estate began to receive the returned materials in April 1994. Administrative Information Access: Open, exceptions for Personal Privacy Publication Rights: The Richard Nixon Library and Birthplace Foundation has deeded all copyrights which it has in the materials to the United States of America and those materials are in the public domain. Copyright restrictions may exist for commercial materials included in the collection. Preferred Citation: Folder title.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents (Click on Index Item to Locate)
    Contents (Click on index item to locate) Subject Page Statement of Information -Part 2 689 Statement of Information and Supporting Evidentiary Material - Part 2 721 NOTE: Book III is published in two parts. Part 1 contains the entire statement of information and supporting evidentiary material for paragraphs 1-47. Part 2 contains copies of paragraphs 48-75 and the supporting evidentiary material for those paragraphs. I STATEMENT OF INFORMATION HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NINETY-THIRD CONGRESS SECOND SESSION PURSUANT TO H. Res. 803 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY TO INVESTIGATE WHETHER SUFFICIENT GROUNDS EXIST FOR THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO EXERCISE ITS CONSTITUTIONAL POWER TO IMPEACH RICHARD 51. NIXON PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Boots III—PART 2 EVENTS FOLLOWING THE WATERGATE BREAK-IN June 20, 1972—March 22, l973 MAY-JUNE 1974 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON 1974 }'or sale by the Superillte ldel t of Documents, U.S. (loverllmellt Printing Of lice Washington, D.C. 20402 - Pnce $11.50 per set HAROLD D. DONOHUE, Massachusetts JAeK BROOKS, Texas ROBERT W. KASTENMEIER, Wisconsin DON EDWARDS, California WILLIAM L. lIT NGATE, Missouri JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan JOSHUA EILBERG, Pennsylvania JEROME R. WALDIE, California WALTER FLOWERS, Alabama JAMES R. MANN, South Carolina PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland JOEIN F. SEIBERLING, Ohio GEORGE E. DANIELSON, California ROBERT F. DRINAN, Massachusetts CHARLES B. RANGEL, New York BARBARA JORDAN, Texas RAY THORNTON, Arkansas ELIZABETH HOLTZMAN, New York WAYNE OWENS, Utah EDWARD MEZVINS33Y, Iowa CO5INIITTEE ONT To IE JITDICIARY PETER W. RODINO, JR,, New Jersey, Chairman EDWARD HUTCHINSON, Michigan ROBERT McCLORY, Illinois HENRY P.
    [Show full text]
  • Urgent Public Interest
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE: PETITION OF ) ) BENJAMIN WITTES ) P.O. Box 33226 ) Washington, D.C. 20033; ) ) JACK GOLDSMITH ) Misc. Case No. ____________ 1563 Massachusetts Avenue ) Cambridge, MA 02138; ) ) and ) ) STEPHEN BATES ) 269 Canyon Spirit Dr. ) Henderson, NV 89012. ) ) ) PETITION FOR ORDER DIRECTING RELEASE OF THE “ROAD MAP” TRANSMITTED BY THE WATERGATE GRAND JURY TO THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IN 1974 Benjamin Wittes, Jack Goldsmith, and Stephen Bates (hereinafter, collectively, “Petitioners”) hereby petition this Court to order disclosure of the impeachment referral report known as the “Road Map” that the Watergate grand jury transmitted to the House Judiciary Committee in 1974. Specifically, Petitioners seek an order disclosing the Road Map pursuant to this Court’s inherent supervisory authority to release grand jury materials or, alternatively, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)(6). The Road Map is located at the National Archives and Records Administration in College Park, Maryland, as part of Record Group 460, Records of the Watergate Special Prosecution Force, Special Prosecutor’s File, Records Relating to Richard Nixon. PETITIONERS 1. Benjamin Wittes is a journalist, focusing on issues of national security and American law. Mr. Wittes is Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Lawfare.1 Mr. Wittes is also a Senior Fellow in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution. 2. Jack Goldsmith is the Henry L. Shattuck Professor at Harvard Law School, Co-Founder of Lawfare, and Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution. Professor Goldsmith served as Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel from 2003-2004, and Special Counsel to the General Counsel of the Department of Defense from 2002-2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum for Sharon Fawcett, Assistant Archivist, Office of Presidential Libraries, National Archives and Records Administration
    MEMORANDUM FOR SHARON FAWCETT, ASSISTANT ARCHIVIST, OFFICE OF PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARIES, NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION From: Ronald H. Walker, Chairman and President, Richard Nixon Foundation Date: August 2, 2010 Subject: Response to Draft Watergate Exhibit We appreciate the opportunity to offer review and comment on Dr. Timothy Naftali’s proposed Watergate exhibit. When finalized, this exhibit will occupy the largest space devoted to a single issue in the Nixon Library. The content and design of the exhibit are obviously of great interest to the National Archives, the Nixon Foundation, the history community, the media, and the general public. It is likely true that no new exhibit in any presidential library will attract the level of scrutiny and attention that this new exhibit is likely to receive. Accordingly, we have devoted considerable time and resources to reviewing the proposed material. Our goal has been to offer a specific and constructive set of comments for your consideration. To pull together such a response I asked several people to review the material. Serving on the team were Bob Bostock, Dwight Chapin, Frank Gannon, Tod Hullin, and Sandy Quinn. We also benefited from the independent submission by Geoff Shepard. The review team has spent countless hours analyzing the proposed exhibit, performing independent research, and developing the comments we present in this memo. Our response is organized as follows: • Identify our shared goals for the exhibit; • Comments on the process used in drafting the exhibit; • General comment on the proposed exhibit as a whole; • Discussion of the “special environment” in which the Nixon Library operates; • Suggestions for collaboration on future exhibits; and • An alternate approach to the Watergate exhibit We also attach our specific comments regarding the proposed exhibit text to this memo for your consideration.
    [Show full text]