DOCSLIB.ORG

Watergate in Court

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Watergate in Court Nixon A Guide to Mitchell Haldeman Ehrlichman Mardian Parkinson Magruder Krogh WATERGATE Liddy CIA Colson McCord Hunt IN COURT Connolly Jacobsen Rebozo Strachan IRS Ulasewicz Kalmbach LaRue Barker Sturgis Kleindienst Gray FBI Dean Silbert Woodward Bernstein Richardson Cox Jaworski Neal THE OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPTS OF THE COURT PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOUR Hart MAJOR WATERGATE TRIALS, Sirica INCLUDING INDICTMENTS & EXHIBITS. A Guide to WATERGATE IN COURT A MICROFILM PROJECT OF UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA, INC. 2523 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA 22201 Copyright 0 1975 by University Publications of America, Inc. All rights reserved. ISBN 0-89093-039-2 - ISBN 0-89093-040-6 ISBN 0-89093-041-4 - ISBN 0-89093-042-2 Putted jitate* ^tstrttt (Eourt for i\\t ^Btstritt of Columbia Page 3 Criminal No. 1827-72 United States v. George Gordon Liddy, Everette Howard Hunt, James W. McCord, Bernard L. Barker, Eugenia R. Martinez, Frank A. Sturgis, VirgiKo R. Gonzalez Page 9 Criminal No. 74-116 United States v. John D. Ehrlichman, Charles W. Colson, G. Gordon Liddy, Bernard L. Barker, Felipe DeDiego, Eugenia R. Martinez Page 13 Criminal No. 74-110 United States v. John N. Mitchell, Harry R. Haldeman, John D. Ehrlichman, Robert C. Mardian, Kenneth W. Parkinson Page 25 Criminal No. 74-440 United States v. JohnB. Connolly Pmted ^States ^Btstrict (Eourt for i{\t District of Columbia Criminal No. 1827-72 United States v. George Gordon Liddy, Everette Howard Hunt, James W. McCord, Bernard L. Barker, Eugenia R. Martinez, Frank A. Sturgis, Virgilio R. Gonzalez Proceedings before the Honorable John J. Sirica, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Columbia Appearances on behalf of the United States: Earl Silbert, Assistant U.S. Attorney; Seymour Glanzer, Assistant U.S. Attorney; Donald Camp- bell, Assistant U.S. Attorney. Appearances on behalf of Defendant Liddy: Peter L. Maroulis, Esq.; Thomas A. Kennelly, Esq. Appearances on behalf of Defendant Hunt: William 0. Bittman, Esq.; Austin S. Mittler, Esq. Appearances on behalf of Defendant McCord: Gerald Alch, Esq.; Ber- nard Shankman, Esq. Appearances on behalf of Defendants Barker, Martinez, Sturgis, and Gonzalez: Henry B. Rothblatt, Esq.; Donald Cope, Esq. Reell January 10,1973 Voir dire examination of: Theodore Herrera 3 Virgilio Gonzalez 8 Opening statement on behalf of the United States 15 Opening statement on behalf of Defendant McCord 76 Opening statement on behalf of Defendants Barker, Gonzalez, Martinez, and Sturgis 79 January 11,1973 Plea of Defendant Hunt 106 WITNESSES: Colon Alford 158 George C. Mumford, Jr 165 Eric M. Jaffe 172 Robert B. Fletcher 181 Thomas Gregory 210 January 12,1973 Proceedings, pages 302-352, ordered sealed by the Court. January 15,1973 Plea of Defendants Barker, Martinez, Sturgis, and Gonzalez 357 Arguments on motion for mistrial 426 Rulings by the Court 440 WITNESSES: Thomas Gregory 452 January 16,1973 WITNESSES: Thomas Gregory 522 Frank Wills 575 John B. Barrett 586 Paul W. Leeper 710 Carl M. Shoffler 721 Richard A. Hamilton 727 Larry Linville 736 January 17,1973 WITNESSES: Robert E. Denell 756 Donald G. Cherry 831 John B. Barrett 849 Paul W. Leeper 853 Carl M. Shoffler 857 Richard A. Hamilton 862 Larry Linville 865 Donald G. Cherry 868 Lawrence Cunningham 873 Larry K. Muncy 875 Carlos J. Neal 885 Paul Chapman 909 Alfred C. Baldwin, III 914 January 19,1973 WITNESSES: Alfred C. Baldwin, III 1028 January 22,1973 WITNESSES: Robert A. Wait 1094 Michael D. Caddy 1106 Alfred C. Baldwin, III 1225 Voirdire examination of Michael D. Caddy 1244 Reel 2 January 23,1973 Bond hearing re Barker, Sturgis, Martinez, and Gonzalez 1279 WITNESSES: Robert F. Bennett 1323 Robert C. Olde, Jr 1346 Jeb Magruder 1400 Herbert Porter 1423 Hugh W. Sloan, Jr 1431 Ectore Reynaldo 1472 January 24,1973 WITNESSES: Roysanford Scherrer 1512 John S. Wilburn, Jr 1519 Dora Wilt 1528 David P. Quinn 1535 Judith R. Aldock 1538 Joseph B. Parsons 1561 Linda L. Jones 1599 Morton B. Jackson 1604 Stanley R. Greigg 1619 Harry A. Collot 1627 Melvin J. Stern 1634 January 26,1973 Proceedings, pages 1676-1690, ordered sealed by the Court. Proceedings in chambers 1691 WITNESSES: Michael Richardson 1760 Kathleen A. Chenow 1771 Richard H. Everett 1780 Leonard Glasser 1792 Michael J. Brennan 1811 Miguel A. Suarez 1820 Franco Rovere 1830 Margaret Schiller 1837 Bruce Kehrli 1847 Daniel C. Mahan 1859 Thomas H. Murphy 1865 Ida M. Wells 1874 January 29,1973 WITNESSES: Fred Fielding 1903 Robert S. Oliver 1909 Michael D. Caddy 1946 Robert L. Houston 1949 Sister Mary Riley 1957 Rev. Archie S. Oliver, Jr 1962 Rev. Walter C. Smith, Jr 1965 Robert C. Olde 1971 Roger V. Earth 1973 William D. Novelli 1996 Dennis J. McClure 1999 Michael D. Caddy 2002 Frank B. Shemanski 2004 Angelo J. Lano 2008 Closing argument on behalf of the United States 2028 January 30,1973 Closing argument on behalf of Defendant Liddy 2076 Closing argument on behalf of Defendant McCord 2108 Rebuttal argument on behalf of the United States 2160 Court's charge to the jury 2184 Verdict 2247 March 22,1973 Sentencing 1-47 Putted jitates District Court for tip ^Btdrtct of Columbia Criminal No. 74-116 United States v. John D. Ehrlichman, Charles W. Colson, G. Gordon Liddy, Bernard L. Barker, Felipe DeDiego, Eugenio R. Martinez Proceedings before the Honorable Gerhard A. Gesell, Judge, United States District Court for the District of Columbia Appearances on behalf of the United States: William Merrill, Associate Special Prosecutor; Philip J. Bakes and Charles Breyer, Assistant Spe- cial Prosecutors. Appearances on behalf of Defendant Ehrlichman: John J. Wilson, Esq.; Frank H. Strickler, Esq.; William S. Frates, Esq. Appearances on behalf of Defendant Colson: Sidney Dickstein, Esq.; David Shapiro, Esq. Appearances on behalf of Defendant Liddy: Peter L. Maroulis, Esq.; Charles F. Barker, Esq. Appearances on behalf of Defendants Barker and Martinez: Daniel E. Schultz, Esq. Appearances on behalf of Defendant DeDiego: Dana Brigham, Esq.; Henry Rothblatt, Esq. Reell March 14,1974 Arraignments and Status Conference 3 June 26,1974 Voir dire examination of the jury 3 June 27,1974 Voir dire examination of the jury 299 June 28,1974 Opening statement on behalf of the United States 537 Opening statement on behalf of Defendant Ehrlichman 586 Opening statement on behalf of Defendant Liddy 597 Opening statement on behalf of Defendants Barker and Martinez . 603 WITNESSES: Michael Haigwood 666 Clinton Brickley 672 Lewis J. Fielding 680 E. Howard Hunt, Jr 729 July 1,1974 WITNESSES: E. Howard Hunt, Jr 848 David R. Young 938 July 2,1974 WITNESSES: David R. Young 1094 Kathleen A. Chenow 1219 EgilKrogh, Jr 1261 Reel 2 July 3,1974 WITNESSES: EgilKrogh, Jr 1328 Charles W. Colson 1381 Joseph D. Baroody 1448 Robert E. Cushman, Jr 1454 Charles A. Regan 1526 Earl J. Silbert 1546 July 5,1974 WITNESSES: Gertrude B. Frye 1580 Cecil Emerson 1596 Geoff Shepard 1602 Karen Sheinberg 1611 Jana Hruska 1712 Todd Hullin 1748 Bernard M. Malloy 1771 Arthur Fletcher 1789 JulyS, 1974 WITNESSES: William J. Wilkins 1807 Paul Patton 1813 John D. Ehrlichman 1815 July 9,1974 WITNESSES: John D. Ehrlichman 2033 William M. Treadwell 2118 Eugenio R. Martinez 2147 Bernard L. Barker 2184 Guy Vanderjagt 2223 Renirdo Blanco 2225 July 10,1974 WITNESSES: Manuel F. Artime 2247 Luis Conte-Aguero 2251 Max L. Menendez 2255 Henry A. Kissinger 2292 July 11,1974 Closing argument on behalf of the United States 2313 Closing argument on behalf of Defendant Ehrlichman 2377 Closing argument on behalf of Defendant Liddy 2429 Closing argument on behalf of Defendants Barker and Martinez ... 2444 Rebuttal argument on behalf of the United States 2478 July 12,1974 Court's charge to the jury 2506 Court's discussion with counsel 2547 Verdict 2557 Putted ^tate0 Jtatrtct Court for tlje *9t£trttt of (Columbia Criminal No. 74-110 United States v. John N. Mitchell, Harry R. Haldeman, John D. Ehrlichman, Robert C. Mardian, Kenneth W. Parkinson Proceedings before the Honorable John J. Sirica, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Columbia Appearances on behalf of the United States: James Neal, Associate Special Prosecutor; Richard Ben-Veniste, Jill Wine Volner, George Frampton, Gerald Goldman, Peter Rient, Larry Isian, and Carl Feld- baum, Assistant Special Prosecutors. Appearances on behalf of Defendant Mitchell: William Hundley, Esq.; Plato Cacheris, Esq. Appearances on behalf of Defendant Haldeman: John J. Wilson, Esq.; Frank Strickler, Esq.; Ross O'Donoghue, Esq.; John Brennan, Esq. Appearances on behalf of Defendant Ehrlichman: William Frates, Esq.; Andrew Hall, Esq.; Spencer Jones, Esq. Appearances on behalf of Defendant Mardian: Davis Bress, Esq.; Thom- as Green, Esq. Appearances on behalf of Defendant Parkinson: Jacob Stein, Esq.; Nicholas McConnell, Esq. Proceedings, pages 1-2260, consisting of voir dire of the jury, ordered sealed by the Court. Reell October 14,1974 Opening statement on behalf of the United States 2264 October 15,1974 Opening statement on behalf of Defendant Ehrlichman 2416 Opening statement on behalf of Defendant Mardian 2466 October 16,1974 Opening statement on behalf of Defendant Parkinson 2568 WITNESSES: John W. Dean, III 2612 October 17,1974 WITNESSES: John W. Dean, III 2816 October 18,1974 WITNESSES: John W. Dean, III 2976 October 21,1974 WITNESSES: John W. Dean, III 3139 October 22,1974 WITNESSES: John W. Dean, III 3253 October 23,1974 WITNESSES: John W. Dean, III 3421 Reel 2 October 24,1974 WITNESSES: John W. Dean, III 3621 October 25,1974 WITNESSES: John W. Dean, III 3831 October 28,1974 WITNESSES: E. Howard Hunt 4104 October 29,1974 WITNESSES: E. Howard Hunt 4307 Jeb Stuart Magruder 4502 October 30,1974 WITNESSES: Jeb Stuart Magruder 4528 October 31,1974 WITNESSES: Jeb Stuart Magruder 4767 November 1,1974 WITNESSES: Jeb Stuart Magruder 4936 Reel 3 November 4,1974 WITNESSES: Jeb Stuart Magruder 5248 Robert A.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A List of the Records That Petitioners Seek Is Attached to the Petition, Filed Concurrently Herewith
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE PETITION OF STANLEY KUTLER, ) AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION, ) AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR LEGAL HISTORY, ) Miscellaneous Action No. ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN HISTORIANS, ) and SOCIETY OF AMERICAN ARCHIVISTS. ) ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR ORDER DIRECTING RELEASE OF TRANSCRIPT OF RICHARD M. NIXON’S GRAND JURY TESTIMONY OF JUNE 23-24, 1975, AND ASSOCIATED MATERIALS OF THE WATERGATE SPECIAL PROSECUTION FORCE Professor Stanley Kutler, the American Historical Association, the American Society for Legal History, the Organization of American Historians, and the Society of American Archivists petition this Court for an order directing the release of President Richard M. Nixon’s thirty-five-year- old grand jury testimony and associated materials of the Watergate Special Prosecution Force.1 On June 23-24, 1975, President Nixon testified before two members of a federal grand jury who had traveled from Washington, DC, to San Clemente, California. The testimony was then presented in Washington, DC, to the full grand jury that had been convened to investigate political espionage, illegal campaign contributions, and other wrongdoing falling under the umbrella term Watergate. Watergate was the defining event of Richard Nixon’s presidency. In the early 1970s, as the Vietnam War raged and the civil rights movement in the United States continued its momentum, the Watergate scandal ignited a crisis of confidence in government leadership and a constitutional crisis that tested the limits of executive power and the mettle of the democratic process. “Watergate” was 1A list of the records that petitioners seek is attached to the Petition, filed concurrently herewith.
    [Show full text]
  • John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan Pacific Cgem Orge School of Law
    University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship 2010 The akM ing of the Attorney General: John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan Pacific cGeM orge School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/facultyarticles Part of the Legal Biography Commons, and the President/Executive Department Commons Recommended Citation 41 McGeorge L. Rev. 311 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Book Review Essay The Making of the Attorney General: John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan* I. INTRODUCTION Shortly after I resigned my position as General Counsel of the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department in 1971, I was startled to receive a two-page letter from Attorney General John Mitchell. I was not a Department of Justice employee, and Mitchell's acquaintance with me was largely second-hand. The contents were surprising. Mitchell generously lauded my rather modest role "in developing an effective and professional law enforcement program for the District of Columbia." Beyond this, he added, "Your thoughtful suggestions have been of considerable help to me and my colleagues at the Department of Justice." The salutation was, "Dear Jerry," and the signature, "John." I was elated. I framed the letter and hung it in my office.
    [Show full text]
  • Nixon - Papers Access Authorizations (2)” of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 28, folder “Nixon - Papers Access Authorizations (2)” of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 28 of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library J ' WASHif'JGTO:>J August 1, l97L1: JvlEMORANDUM FOR: H. STUART KNIGHT DIRECTOR OF SECRET SERVICE / FROM: GEOFFREY S:E-IEPARD~>. - SUBJECT: Access to Files This is to authorize Mr. George Williams to have access to the files of Mr. H. R. Haldern.c.n in Room 522 of the Executive Office "Building for the purpose of searching for documents subpoenaed by the Special Prosecutor. / .• THE \VH!TE HOUS2: WAShiNGTON August 6, 1974 MElvf.ORi\::\D 'J.Nl FOR: H. STUART Y>-L'41GHT DIRECTOR OF SECRET SERVICE FROM: GEOFFREYSHEPAF~~~ SUBJECT: Access to Files This is to authorize Mr. George Williams to have access to the files of Mr. John Dean in Room 84 and Room 522 of the Executive Oiiice Building for the purpose of searching for documents subpoenaed by the Special Prosecutor.
    [Show full text]
  • WSPF Prosecutor (Neal)
    ¯ Ii,55-= CLOSING ARGUMENT ON BEHALF OF THE G°VERNMENT 3) MR. NEAL: Ladies and gentlemen!~°f the jury, may it please the court: After twelve weeks you know who I am. I do stand up to represent the United States of America- I have done it many times, I always do it with pride; and at the same time, a sense of not quite being as competent as the man who representS his country should be. I feel that way in this case particularly because of the array of fine legal talent representing the DefendantS- They are all excellent and capable lawyers,.I am sure you have seen that, and I congratulate them on their effortS in this lawsuit- In the course of this argument, I will refer to the DefendantS as Mitchell, Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Mardian, and Parkinson- I don’t mean any lack of respect, I respect every being. I leave off the Mister simply to save time and try to move on with the argument- I want it clear that what I say up here is not eviden( It is not evidence of anything" It is an argument based on the Government’S contention as to the evidence- If I inadvertently, and it wil! be inadvertently, say anything that in your mind is not in the record, you have not heard from the witness stand here or you have seen as an exhibl then "it will be inadvertent and your recollection of what the 11,556 evidence is must pertain. Now, I am sure defense counsel, when they.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents (Click on Index Item to Locate)
    Contents (Click on index item to locate) Subject Page Foreword iii Introductory Note xi Statement of Information 1 Statement of Information and Supporting Evidence 69 As-- ~~ on y 35 780 0 STATEMENT O19 INFORMATION H E A R I N G S BEFORE THE COMMITTEE OWN THE JUDICIARY HOI:TSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NINETY-THIRD CONGRESS SECOND SESSION PIJR61JANT TO H. Res. 803 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY TO INVESTIGATE WHETHER SUFFICIENT GROUNDS EXIST FOR THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO EXERCISE ITS CONSTITUTIONAL POWER TO IMPEACH RICHARD M. NIXON PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BOOK II EVENTS FOLLOWING THE WATERGATE BREAK-IN June 17,1972-February 9,1973 MAY—JUNE 1974 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1974 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. Price $6.10. COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY PETER W. RODINO, JO., New Jersey, Chairman HAROLD D. DONOHUE, Massachusetts EDWARD HUTCHINSON, Michigan JACK BROOKS, Texas ROBERT MCeLORY, Illinois ROBERT W. KASTENMEIER, Wisconsin HENRY P. SMITH III, New York DON EDWARDS, California CHARLES W. SANDMAN, Jo., New Jersey WILLIAM L. HUNGATE, Missouri ~~A. JOHN CONFERS, JR., Michigan JOSHUA EILBERG, Pennsylvania JEROME R. WALDIE, California WALTER FLOWERS, Alabama JAMES R. MANN, South Carolina PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland JOHN F. SEIBERLING, Ohio GEORGE E. DANIELSON, California ROBERT F. DRINAN, Massaehusetts CHARLES B. RANGEL, New York BARBARA JORDAN, Texas RAY THORNTON, Arkansas ELIZABETH HOLTZMAN, New York WAYNE OWENS, Utah EDWARD MEZVINSRY, Iowa TOM RAILS BACK, Illinois CHARLES E. WIGGINS, California DAVID W. DENNIS, Indiana HAMILTON FISH, JH., New York WILEY MAYNE, Iowa LAWRENCE J.
    [Show full text]
  • The President's Conservatives: Richard Nixon and the American Conservative Movement
    ALL THE PRESIDENT'S CONSERVATIVES: RICHARD NIXON AND THE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE MOVEMENT. David Sarias Rodriguez Department of History University of Sheffield Submitted for the degree of PhD October 2010 ABSTRACT This doctoral dissertation exammes the relationship between the American conservative movement and Richard Nixon between the late 1940s and the Watergate scandal, with a particular emphasis on the latter's presidency. It complements the sizeable bodies ofliterature about both Nixon himself and American conservatism, shedding new light on the former's role in the collapse of the post-1945 liberal consensus. This thesis emphasises the part played by Nixon in the slow march of American conservatism from the political margins in the immediate post-war years to the centre of national politics by the late 1960s. The American conservative movement is treated as a diverse epistemic community made up of six distinct sub-groupings - National Review conservatives, Southern conservatives, classical liberals, neoconservatives, American Enterprise Institute conservatives and the 'Young Turks' of the New Right - which, although philosophically and behaviourally autonomous, remained intimately associated under the overall leadership of the intellectuals who operated from the National Review. Although for nearly three decades Richard Nixon and American conservatives endured each other in a mutually frustrating and yet seemingly unbreakable relationship, Nixon never became a fully-fledged member of the movement. Yet, from the days of Alger Hiss to those of the' Silent Majority', he remained the political actor best able to articulate and manipulate the conservative canon into a populist, electorally successful message. During his presidency, the administration's behaviour played a crucial role - even if not always deliberately - in the momentous transformation of the conservative movement into a more diverse, better-organised, modernised and more efficient political force.
    [Show full text]
  • F:\Nixon -- Move to Former Staff on 9.2\Declarations
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE PETITION OF STANLEY KUTLER, ) AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION, ) AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR LEGAL HISTORY, ) Miscellaneous Action No. ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN HISTORIANS, ) and SOCIETY OF AMERICAN ARCHIVISTS. ) ___________________________________________) DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR ORDER DIRECTING RELEASE OF TRANSCRIPT OF RICHARD M. NIXON’S GRAND JURY TESTIMONY OF JUNE 23-24, 1975, AND ASSOCIATED MATERIALS OF THE WATERGATE SPECIAL PROSECUTION FORCE Allison M. Zieve (D.C. Bar No. 424786) Michael T. Kirkpatrick (D.C. Bar No. 486293 Public Citizen Litigation Group 1600 20th Street NW Washington, DC 20009 (202) 588-1000 Counsel for Petitioners TABLE OF CONTENTS Tab Declaration of Stanley Kutler.................................................... A Declaration of Julian Helisek (including exhibits) ................................... B Declaration of Richard J. Davis .................................................. C Declaration of John W. Dean III ................................................. D Declaration of David M. Dorsen ................................................. E Declaration of Mark Feldstein ................................................... F Declaration of Don Fulsom ..................................................... G Declaration of David Greenberg ................................................. H Declaration of Kenneth J. Hughes, Jr. .............................................. I Declaration of Thomas Long ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NFS Form 10-900 (Rev. 11-90) Y5&2&\ \Opafto.l0024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties or districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to compete all items. 1. Name of Property______________________________________________ Historic name: Watergate______________________________________________ Other names/site number:_________________________________________________ 2. T vocation____________________________________________________ Street fc Number 2500^ 7.6003 2650. 7.600 Virginia Avemie3 N.W.; 6003 700 New Hampshire Avenue., N.W.__________________________________[ ] Not for Publication_____ City or town: Washington_____________________[ ] Vicinity___________________ State: DC________Code- 001 County_________Code:______Zip Code: 20037______ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification__________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Nixon Presidential Returned Materials Collection White House Central Files (WHCF)
    Nixon Presidential Returned Materials Collection White House Central Files (WHCF) Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum National Archives and Records Administration Processed by Nixon Presidential Materials Staff, Yorba Linda, California, 2007 Contact Information Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum ATTN: Archives 18001 Yorba Linda Boulevard Yorba Linda, California 92886 Phone: (714) 993-5075 Fax: (714) 528-0544 E-mail: [email protected] 2 Table Of Contents Descriptive Summary [pg 3] Administrative Information [pg 3] Administrative History [pg 4] Scope and Content Summary [pg 5] Folder Title List [pg 7] 3 Descriptive Summary Title: Nixon Presidential Returned Materials Collection: White House Central Files (WHCF) Creator: Office of the White House Central Files National Archives and Records Administration Extent: 101 boxes, Approximately 43 Linear Feet Repository: Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum 18001 Yorba Linda Boulevard Yorba Linda, California 92886 Abstract: The Nixon Presidential Returned Materials Collection: White House Central Files consist of materials returned to the estate of former President Richard Nixon by archivists from the Nixon Presidential Materials Project. The archivists considered certain documents to be ‘Returnable’ to the Nixon estate if the subject matter of the documents were viewed as personal or personal/political. The Nixon estate began to receive the returned materials in April 1994. Administrative Information Access: Open, exceptions for Personal Privacy Publication Rights: The Richard Nixon Library and Birthplace Foundation has deeded all copyrights which it has in the materials to the United States of America and those materials are in the public domain. Copyright restrictions may exist for commercial materials included in the collection. Preferred Citation: Folder title.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents (Click on Index Item to Locate)
    Contents (Click on index item to locate) Subject Page Statement of Information -Part 2 689 Statement of Information and Supporting Evidentiary Material - Part 2 721 NOTE: Book III is published in two parts. Part 1 contains the entire statement of information and supporting evidentiary material for paragraphs 1-47. Part 2 contains copies of paragraphs 48-75 and the supporting evidentiary material for those paragraphs. I STATEMENT OF INFORMATION HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NINETY-THIRD CONGRESS SECOND SESSION PURSUANT TO H. Res. 803 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY TO INVESTIGATE WHETHER SUFFICIENT GROUNDS EXIST FOR THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO EXERCISE ITS CONSTITUTIONAL POWER TO IMPEACH RICHARD 51. NIXON PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Boots III—PART 2 EVENTS FOLLOWING THE WATERGATE BREAK-IN June 20, 1972—March 22, l973 MAY-JUNE 1974 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON 1974 }'or sale by the Superillte ldel t of Documents, U.S. (loverllmellt Printing Of lice Washington, D.C. 20402 - Pnce $11.50 per set HAROLD D. DONOHUE, Massachusetts JAeK BROOKS, Texas ROBERT W. KASTENMEIER, Wisconsin DON EDWARDS, California WILLIAM L. lIT NGATE, Missouri JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan JOSHUA EILBERG, Pennsylvania JEROME R. WALDIE, California WALTER FLOWERS, Alabama JAMES R. MANN, South Carolina PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland JOEIN F. SEIBERLING, Ohio GEORGE E. DANIELSON, California ROBERT F. DRINAN, Massachusetts CHARLES B. RANGEL, New York BARBARA JORDAN, Texas RAY THORNTON, Arkansas ELIZABETH HOLTZMAN, New York WAYNE OWENS, Utah EDWARD MEZVINS33Y, Iowa CO5INIITTEE ONT To IE JITDICIARY PETER W. RODINO, JR,, New Jersey, Chairman EDWARD HUTCHINSON, Michigan ROBERT McCLORY, Illinois HENRY P.
    [Show full text]
  • Urgent Public Interest
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE: PETITION OF ) ) BENJAMIN WITTES ) P.O. Box 33226 ) Washington, D.C. 20033; ) ) JACK GOLDSMITH ) Misc. Case No. ____________ 1563 Massachusetts Avenue ) Cambridge, MA 02138; ) ) and ) ) STEPHEN BATES ) 269 Canyon Spirit Dr. ) Henderson, NV 89012. ) ) ) PETITION FOR ORDER DIRECTING RELEASE OF THE “ROAD MAP” TRANSMITTED BY THE WATERGATE GRAND JURY TO THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IN 1974 Benjamin Wittes, Jack Goldsmith, and Stephen Bates (hereinafter, collectively, “Petitioners”) hereby petition this Court to order disclosure of the impeachment referral report known as the “Road Map” that the Watergate grand jury transmitted to the House Judiciary Committee in 1974. Specifically, Petitioners seek an order disclosing the Road Map pursuant to this Court’s inherent supervisory authority to release grand jury materials or, alternatively, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)(6). The Road Map is located at the National Archives and Records Administration in College Park, Maryland, as part of Record Group 460, Records of the Watergate Special Prosecution Force, Special Prosecutor’s File, Records Relating to Richard Nixon. PETITIONERS 1. Benjamin Wittes is a journalist, focusing on issues of national security and American law. Mr. Wittes is Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Lawfare.1 Mr. Wittes is also a Senior Fellow in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution. 2. Jack Goldsmith is the Henry L. Shattuck Professor at Harvard Law School, Co-Founder of Lawfare, and Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution. Professor Goldsmith served as Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel from 2003-2004, and Special Counsel to the General Counsel of the Department of Defense from 2002-2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum for Sharon Fawcett, Assistant Archivist, Office of Presidential Libraries, National Archives and Records Administration
    MEMORANDUM FOR SHARON FAWCETT, ASSISTANT ARCHIVIST, OFFICE OF PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARIES, NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION From: Ronald H. Walker, Chairman and President, Richard Nixon Foundation Date: August 2, 2010 Subject: Response to Draft Watergate Exhibit We appreciate the opportunity to offer review and comment on Dr. Timothy Naftali’s proposed Watergate exhibit. When finalized, this exhibit will occupy the largest space devoted to a single issue in the Nixon Library. The content and design of the exhibit are obviously of great interest to the National Archives, the Nixon Foundation, the history community, the media, and the general public. It is likely true that no new exhibit in any presidential library will attract the level of scrutiny and attention that this new exhibit is likely to receive. Accordingly, we have devoted considerable time and resources to reviewing the proposed material. Our goal has been to offer a specific and constructive set of comments for your consideration. To pull together such a response I asked several people to review the material. Serving on the team were Bob Bostock, Dwight Chapin, Frank Gannon, Tod Hullin, and Sandy Quinn. We also benefited from the independent submission by Geoff Shepard. The review team has spent countless hours analyzing the proposed exhibit, performing independent research, and developing the comments we present in this memo. Our response is organized as follows: • Identify our shared goals for the exhibit; • Comments on the process used in drafting the exhibit; • General comment on the proposed exhibit as a whole; • Discussion of the “special environment” in which the Nixon Library operates; • Suggestions for collaboration on future exhibits; and • An alternate approach to the Watergate exhibit We also attach our specific comments regarding the proposed exhibit text to this memo for your consideration.
    [Show full text]