Conoco Phillips Annual Report 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conoco Phillips Annual Report 2021 Conoco Phillips Annual Report 2021 Form 10-K (NYSE:COP) Published: February 16th, 2021 PDF generated by stocklight.com 2020 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K (Mark One) [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 202 0 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commissio n file number:001-32395 ConocoPhillip s (Exact name of registrant as specified in its chart er) Delaware 01-0562944 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 925 N. Eldridge Parkway Houston, TX 77079 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Cod e) Registrant's telephone number, including area co2d8e1:-293-1000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading symbols Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, $.01 Par Value COP New York Stock Exchange 7% Debentures due 2029 CUSIP—718507BK1 New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. [x] Yes [ ] Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of tNhoe Act. [ ] Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 o[rx 1] 5(d) of the SEexchuarintiegse Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file sreupcohrts), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 dYaeys .[ ] I[nx]dicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every INnoteractive Data File required to be spubrsmuiattnetd to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period thaet registrant was required to submit such [x] Yes [ ] f iles). No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a srempaolrletinr g company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “rsempoarltlienrg company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated [x] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting [ ] Emerging fgilreorwth compan y[ ] company If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period fcoormplying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of tehfefectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7b2y 6th2e(b r)e)gistered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit rexp ]ort. [ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). [ ] NYoes [x] The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2020, the last business day of trheegistrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, based on the closing price on that date of $424.50.21 ,b willaiosn. T$he registrant ha1d,354,734,72 7shares of common stock outstanding at January 31, 2021. Documents incorporated by Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Arenfneuraeln Mce:eting of Stockholders to be held on May 11, 2021 (Part III) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Commonly Used Abbreviations………………………………………………………………………. 1 Item PART I 1 and 2. Business and Properties ..................................................................................................2.... Corporate Structure ......................................................................................................2.. Segment and Geographic Information .........................................................................2.. Alaska .....................................................................................................................4.. Lower 48 .................................................................................................................7.. Canada ...................................................................................................................9... Europe, Middle East and North Africa ....................................................................1. 0 Asia Pacific .............................................................................................................1..2 Other International ..................................................................................................1..5 Competition ................................................................................................................1..8. Human Capital Management ......................................................................................1..8. General ........................................................................................................................2..2. 1A. Risk Factors ....................................................................................................................2..3.. 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments ...........................................................................................3..2.. 3. Legal Proceedings ...........................................................................................................3..2.. 4. Mine Safety Disclosures ..................................................................................................3..3. Information About our Executive Officers ........................................................................3. 3 PART II 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities ........................................................................3..5.. 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ..................................................................................................3..7. 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk ...........................................7. 7 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data ...............................................................8..0.. 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure ...................................................................................................1..7..9 9A. Controls and Procedures ................................................................................................1..7..9. 9B. Other Information ...........................................................................................................1..7..9 PART III 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance ..............................................1..8..0 11. Executive Compensation ................................................................................................1..8..0 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters ......................................................................................1..8..0 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence...............1..8..0. 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services ........................................................................1..8..0. PART IV 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules .......................................................................1..8..1. Signatures ......................................................................................................................1..9..1. Commonly Used Abbreviations The following industry-specific, accounting and other terms, and abbreviations may be commonly used in this report. Currencies Accounting $ or USD U.S. dollar ARO asset retirement obligation CAD Canadian dollar ASC accounting standards codification EUR Euro ASU accounting standards update GBP British pound DD&A depreciation, depletion and amortization Units of Measurement FASB Financial Accounting Standards BBL barrel Board BCF billion cubic feet FIFO first-in, first-out BOE barrels of oil equivalent G&A general and administrative MBD thousands of barrels per day GAAP generally accepted accounting MCF thousand cubic feet principles MBOD thousand barrels of oil per day LIFO last-in, first-out MM million NPNS normal purchase normal sale MMBOE million barrels of oil equivalent PP&E properties, plants and equipment MMBOD million barrels of oil per day SAB staff accounting bulletin MBOED thousands of barrels of oil VIE variable interest entity equivalent per day MMBOED millions of barrels of oil equivalent per day Miscellaneous MMBTU million British thermal units EPA Environmental Protection Agency MMCFD million cubic feet per day ESG Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance EU European Union Industry FERC Federal Energy Regulatory CBM coalbed methane Commission E&P exploration and production GHG greenhouse gas FEED front-end engineering and designHSE health, safety and environment FPS floating production system ICC International Chamber of FPSO floating production,
Recommended publications
  • 2019 Annual Report Are Commission-Free
    Table of Contents 1 Letter to Our Shareholders 4 Financial Highlights 6 Our Businesses Midstream Chemicals Refining Marketing and Specialties 7 Our Value Chain 8 Our Strategy Operating Excellence Growth Returns Distributions High-Performing Organization 28 Board of Directors 30 Executive Leadership Team 31 Non-GAAP Reconciliations 32 Form 10-K | ON THE COVER AND TABLE OF CONTENTS Lake Charles Refinery WESTLAKE, LA In 2019, Lake Charles Manufacturing Complex achieved a sustained safety record of more than 55 months, equivalent to 7.5 million safe work hours. 2019 PHILLIPS 66 ANNUAL REPORT 1 To Our Shareholders We have the right strategy in place to create shareholder value, and our employees are executing it well. Phillips 66 achieved 34% total shareholder return during 2019, which exceeded our peer group average and the S&P 100. In 2019, we delivered earnings of $3.1 billion and earnings per share of $6.77. Adjusted earnings were $3.7 billion or $8.05 per share. During the year, we generated $4.8 billion of operating cash flow. We reinvested $3.9 billionback into the business and returned $3.2 billion of capital to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. We increased our quarterly dividend 12.5% and announced a $3 billion increase to our share repurchase program. Since our formation, we have returned $26 billion to shareholders through dividends, share repurchases and exchanges, reducing our initial shares outstanding by 33%. Operating excellence is our No. 1 priority and core to everything we do. Our goal is zero incidents, zero accidents and zero injuries. We believe this is attainable, and we strive for it daily.
    [Show full text]
  • Poncan Theatre
    A Directory of Cultural Sites and Museums in Ponca City , Oklahoma Purpose of Directory Guidebook A tour guide or docent is usually available for assistance. Th is person is knowledgeable Th is “Adventures in History & Heritage” directory guidebook is intended to be a about the museums and collections. Listen and respect them and follow their lead. resource for teachers and citizens. It represents each cultural and/or historic site in Th ey have a wealth of knowledge to share. the Ponca City area and contains information to assist those interested in planning Show respect for the valuable artifacts and treasured items in a museum or a cultural educational visits. We hope you will fi nd the content informative and useful in site. Most items could not be replaced if destroyed. A “hands off ” policy is best when scheduling fi eld trips, group tours or individual visits. Enjoy the adventure and what touring. can be discovered along the way. At the end of the visit, be sure to show your appreciation and thank your guide. Why Cultural Heritage Field Trips are important… Table of Contents • Th ey help others discover the history and roots of a community. City Hall, Centennial Plaza, and Historic Downtown . 4 • Th ey create community awareness. Conoco Museum. 6 • Th ey enhance community pride. Marland Estate Mansion. 8 • Th ey encourage community involvement. Marland’s Grand Home.. 10 • Th ey generate partnerships between local schools, cultural heritage sites, Pioneer Woman Museum. 12 students and citizens. Ponca City Art Center. 14 Ponca City Library Matzene Art Collection. 16 Poncan Th eatre.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Qtr17 Spirit-Magazine.Pdf
    CONOCOPHILLIPS Third Quarter 2017 Providing energy for the world while staying committed to our values. ConocoPhillips is proud to be an industry leader in fi nding and producing the oil and gas the world needs. At the foundation of our work is the commitment we have to our SPIRIT Values—Safety, People, Integrity, Responsibility, Innovation and Teamwork. To learn more, visit www.conocophillips.com © ConocoPhillips Company. 2017. All rights reserved. SHARING INSIGHTS From the desk of Ryan Lance Chairman & CEO AS THE HOUSTON AREA RECOVERS from the devastating aftermath of Hurricane Harvey, I continue to be impressed by the incredible compassion and resilience of our ConocoPhillips workforce. We are forging ahead on many fronts, including the completion of this special issue of spirit Magazine featuring the annual SPIRIT of Performance Awards. One of the most important responsibilities of my job is meeting with ConocoPhillips employees and listening to their ideas and concerns. During the past quarter, I visited China, Malaysia and Indonesia and saw the amazing work our people are doing on projects such as additional development phases at the Peng Lai field in Bohai Bay; production rampup and an active exploration program in Malaysia; and an initiative to sell more gas in Indonesia. During a visit to Alaska, I heard excitement around our Willow discovery in the National Petroleum Reserve and the active upcoming winter drilling campaign. In July, the company’s board of directors joined me on a visit to our Bakken operations in North Dakota, where the team patiently answered all our questions and showed why ConocoPhillips is recognized as an operator of choice in that important region.
    [Show full text]
  • Phillips Petroleum Company 2001 Annual Report
    Phillips Petroleum Company 2001 Annual Report NEW EXPECTATIONS PHILLIPS’ MISSION IS TO PROVIDE SUPERIOR RETURNS FOR SHAREHOLDERS THROUGH TOP PERFORMANCE IN ALL OUR BUSINESSES. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CONTENTS COMPANY IN BRIEF 2 PHILLIPS’WORLDWIDE OPERATIONS Phillips Petroleum Company is a 4 LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS major integrated U.S. oil and gas CEO Jim Mulva describes Phillips’ journey and explains why the company has company. It is headquartered in new expectations for increased shareholder returns. Bartlesville, Oklahoma. The company 7 THE CHAIRMAN’S PERSPECTIVE was founded in 1917. Phillips’ core Jim Mulva responds to questions about the company as it prepares to enter a new era. activities are: 9 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ■ Petroleum exploration and produc- Phillips remains financially strong despite a challenging economic climate. tion on a worldwide scale. 10 EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION (E&P) ■ Petroleum refining, marketing and Phillips anticipates increased oil and gas output from existing projects, and is transportation, primarily in the carrying out a balanced and focused exploration program. United States. 18 REFINING, MARKETING AND TRANSPORTATION (RM&T) ■ Chemicals and plastics production Following its acquisition of Tosco, Phillips is capturing synergies and taking advantage and distribution worldwide through of its expanded capabilities as one of the largest U.S. refiners and marketers. a 50 percent interest in Chevron 24 CHEMICALS Phillips Chemical Company Chevron Phillips Chemical Company is weathering a difficult market, holding down (CPChem). costs and carrying out growth projects. ■ Natural gas gathering, processing 26 GAS GATHERING, PROCESSING AND MARKETING and marketing in North America Phillips’ midstream joint venture is making the most of its strengths while through a 30.3 percent interest in pursuing growth opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Faces of the Future: Conocophillips and Phillips 66 Emerge Spirit Magazine First Quarter 2012 “Energy Production Creates Jobs.”
    CONOCOPHILLIPS ConocoPhillips First Quarter 2012 Faces of the Future: ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66 emerge spirit Magazine First Quarter 2012 “Energy production creates jobs.” “We need to protect the environment.” Each wants the best for our country. So how can we satisfy both — right now? At ConocoPhillips, we’re helping to power America’s economy with cleaner, affordable natural gas. And the jobs, revenue and safer energy it provides. Which helps answer both their concerns. In real time. To find out why natural gas is the right answer, visit PowerInCooperation.com © ConocoPhillips Company. 2011. All rights reserved. Sharing Insights Five years ago, I wrote the first Sharing Insights letter for the new spirit Magazine. Since then, the magazine has documented a pivotal time in our company’s history, consistently delivering news and information to a wide-ranging audience. More than 7,000 employees have appeared in its pages. Remarkably, as the magazine grew, so did the number of employees who volunteered to contribute content. When your audience is engaged enough to do that, you know you are making a difference. Now, as we approach the completion of our repositioning effort, I am writing in what will be the final issue of spirit Magazine for Jim Mulva Chairman and CEO the integrated company. I have little doubt that both ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66 will continue to offer robust and engaging internal communications. But it seems fitting that this final issue includes a variety of feature articles, news stories and people profiles that reflect the broad scope of our work across upstream and downstream and the rich heritage of our history.
    [Show full text]
  • Exxon Bayway Refinery Co, Linden, New Jersey
    ExxonMobil Bayway Refinery CA750 Page 1 of 40 DOCUMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR DETERMINATION RCRA Corrective Action Environmental Indicator (EI) RCRIS code (CA750) Migration of Contaminated Groundwater Under Control Facility Name: ExxonMobil Bayway Refinery Facility Address: 1400 Park Avenue, Linden, New Jersey Facility EPA ID #: NJD062037031 BACKGROUND Definition of Environmental Indicators (for the RCRA Corrective Action) Environmental Indicators (EI) are measures being used by the RCRA Corrective Action program to go beyond programmatic activity measures (e.g., reports received and approved, etc.) to track changes in the quality of the environment. The two EI developed to-date indicate the quality of the environment in relation to current human exposures to contamination and the migration of contaminated groundwater. An EI for non-human (ecological) receptors is intended to be developed in the future. Definition of “Migration of Contaminated Groundwater Under Control” EI A positive “Migration of Contaminated Groundwater Under Control” EI determination (“YE” status code) indicates that the migration of “contaminated” groundwater has stabilized, and that monitoring will be conducted to confirm that contaminated groundwater remains within the original “area of contaminated groundwater” (for all groundwater “contamination” subject to RCRA corrective action at or from the identified facility (i.e., site-wide)). Relationship of EI to Final Remedies While Final remedies remain the long-term objective of the RCRA Corrective Action program the EI are near-term objectives which are currently being used as Program measures for the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993, GPRA). The “Migration of Contaminated Groundwater Under Control” EI pertains ONLY to the physical migration (i.e., further spread) of contaminated ground water and contaminants within groundwater (e.g., non-aqueous phase liquids or NAPLs).
    [Show full text]
  • Technology Delivers a Competitive Advantage New Directions in Deepwater Gulf of Mexico
    CONOCOPHILLIPS Fourth Quarter 2012 Technology delivers a competitive advantage New directions in deepwater Gulf of Mexico The power of collaboration elevates performance Sharing Insights As energy resources become more complex to access, develop and produce, technology plays an increasingly pivotal role in our future new growth and competitive position. Over the next several years, ConocoPhillips’ biggest new growth areas will be unconventional reservoirs and deepwater, complementing our existing growth plans in oil sands and LNG. To ensure we unlock maximum value and optimize our efforts in these areas, we will need strong technological innovation and collaboration across the organization. Leading the way is new Chief Technology Officer Ram Shenoy, who is applying a strategic management approach to technology with a clear line of sight to corporate strategy. In this issue of spirit Magazine, Al Hirshberg Executive Vice President we take a close look at how Ram and the Technology organization are defining Technology & Projects our future of Smart Growth and Superior Returns. The Technology cover story (Page 10) examines how we are creating a new culture of technological innovation and creativity and how we are identifying and pursuing future growth opportunities. Ultimately, it’s about “doing the right technology projects” and “doing our technology projects right.” We also profile Technology employees who are leading the way through patents that improve heavy oil recovery, pilot programs that support and optimize field development and simula tions that identify problems before they occur. These exciting profiles reveal people with a true passion for innovation and excellence with the common thread of collaboration, integration and teamwork.
    [Show full text]
  • Lacour Electrical Engineer 908-239-1897 | [email protected] | 100 Timberlake Ct, Borger, TX 79007
    John M. LaCour Electrical Engineer 908-239-1897 | [email protected] | 100 Timberlake Ct, Borger, TX 79007 Objective Begin a new career as an educator, using technical, leadership and business skills acquired during my 31-year career as an engineer and manager in the petroleum refining industry. Experience Phillips 66, Borger Refinery, TX 2013-2017 Capital Projects & Automation/Electrical Manager Led Capital Projects Engineering team, responsible for managing a $100 million annual capital budget and executing individual projects ranging from $0.5 to $40 million. Concurrently supervised Automation and Electrical Engineering team, responsible for technical support of refinery safety shutdown systems, process control systems and electrical infrastructure. ConocoPhillips/Phillips 66, Bayway Refinery, NJ 2009-2013 Reliability Engineering Manager Assembled and led multi-disciplined Reliability team, responsible for engineering support of refinery rotating equipment, instrumentation, process control systems and electrical power infrastructure. ConocoPhillips, Headquarters, Houston, TX 2008-2009 Business Development & Strategy Manager Conducted market analysis and valuation for potential business acquisitions and divestments. Prepared weekly operations updates of the Downstream businesses (Refining, Marketing and Transportation) for the CEO and Board of Directors. Researched and developed presentations for Executive Vice President - Downstream, for internal/external communication, especially the annual Wall Street Analysts meeting. LaCour - resume
    [Show full text]
  • The Petroleum Industry: Mergers, Structural Change, and Antitrust
    Federal Trade Commission TIMOTHY J. MURIS Chairman MOZELLE W. THOMPSON Commissioner ORSON SWINDLE Commissioner THOMAS B. LEARY Commissioner PAMELA JONES HARBOUR Commissioner Bureau of Economics Luke M. Froeb Director Mark W. Frankena Deputy Director for Antitrust Paul A. Pautler Deputy Director for Consumer Protection Timothy A. Deyak Associate Director for Competition Analysis Pauline M. Ippolito Associate Director for Special Projects Robert D. Brogan Assistant Director for Antitrust Louis Silvia Assistant Director for Antitrust Michael G. Vita Assistant Director for Antitrust Denis A. Breen Assistant Director for Economic Policy Analysis Gerard R. Butters Assistant Director for Consumer Protection This is a report of the Bureau of Economics of the Federal Trade Commission. The views expressed in this report are those of the staff and do not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Trade Commission or any individual Commissioner. The Commission has voted to authorize staff to publish this report. Acknowledgments This report was prepared by the Bureau of Economics under the supervision of David T. Scheffman, former Director; Mary T. Coleman, former Deputy Director and Mark Frankena, Deputy Director; and Louis Silvia, Assistant Director. Bureau economists who researched and drafted this report were Jay Creswell, Jeffrey Fischer, Daniel Gaynor, Geary Gessler, Christopher Taylor, and Charlotte Wojcik. Bureau Research Analysts who worked on this project were Madeleine McChesney, Joseph Remy, Michael Madigan, Paul Golaszewski, Matthew Tschetter, Ryan Toone, Karl Kindler, Steve Touhy, and Louise Sayers. Bureau of Economics staff also acknowledge the review of drafts and many helpful comments and suggestions from members of the staff of the Bureau of Competition, in particular Phillip L.
    [Show full text]
  • Documentation of Environmental Indicator Determination
    ExxonMobil Bayway Refinery CA725 Page 1 of 21 DOCUMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR DETERMINATION RCRA Corrective Action Environmental Indicator (EI) RCRIS code (CA725) Current Human Exposures Under Control Facility Name: Bayway Refinery Facility Address: 1400 Park Avenue, Linden, New Jersey Facility EPA ID #: NJD062037031 BACKGROUND Definition of Environmental Indicators (for the RCRA Corrective Action) Environmental Indicators (EI) are measures being used by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Corrective Action program to go beyond programmatic activity measures (e.g., reports received and approved, etc.) to track changes in the quality of the environment. The two EIs developed to-date indicate the quality of the environment in relation to current human exposures to contamination and the migration of contaminated groundwater. Definition of “Current Human Exposures Under Control” EI A positive “Current Human Exposures Under Control” EI determination (“YE” status code) indicates that there are no “unacceptable” human exposures to “contamination” (i.e., contaminants in concentrations in excess of appropriate risk-based levels) that can be reasonably expected under current land- and groundwater-use conditions (for all “contamination” subject to RCRA corrective action at or from the identified facility (i.e., site-wide)). Relationship of EI to Final Remedies While Final remedies remain the long-term objective of the RCRA Corrective Action program the EI are near-term objectives which are currently being used as Program measures for the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993, GPRA). The “Current Human Exposures Under Control” EI are for reasonably expected human exposures under current land- and groundwater-use conditions ONLY, and do not consider potential future land- or groundwater-use conditions or ecological receptors.
    [Show full text]
  • Delivering Energy. Building Value
    2007 Annual Report Delivering Energy. Building Value. Worldwide Operations ConocoPhillips operates responsibly in nearly 40 countries throughout the world, providing reliable and sustainable energy supply that powers modern life. Trinidad Alaska Venezuela Equador Canada Peru United States (Lower 48) Argentina Puerto Rico Exploration and Production (E&P) five refineries outside the United States, with an aggregate crude oil Profile: E&P explores for, produces, transports and markets crude oil, processing capacity of 669,000 net BD. Marketing – At year-end natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL) worldwide. Key focus areas 2007, the group sold gasoline, distillates and aviation fuel through include developing legacy assets – large producing projects that can approximatel y 10,500 outlets in the United States and Europe. In the provide strong financial returns over long periods of time – and explor- United States, products were marketed primarily under the Phillips ing for new reserves in promising areas. E&P also extracts bitumen from 66 ®, Conoco ® and 76 ® brands and in Europe primarily under the oil sands deposits in Canada and upgrades it into synthetic crude oil. JET ® brand. The group also sold and marketed lubricants, commercial Operations: At year-end 2007, E&P held a combined 68.5 million fuels and liquid petroleum gas. Additionally, the company participated net developed and undeveloped acres in 23 countries and produced in the specialty products business directly and through joint ventures. hydrocarbons in 16, with proved reserves in three additional countries. Refined products sales totaled 3.2 million BD in 2007. Crude oil production in 2007 averaged 854,000 barrels per day (BD), Transportation – At year-end 2007, the company held interests in natural gas production averaged 5.09 billion cubic feet per day approximately 28,000 miles of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • LUKOIL Background
    LUKOIL Background Russia was, and still is one of the most important energy producer states in the world, however in parallel possesses the peculiarity to be the only country that had to change radically its political environment. The transition from communism to democratic and market based values was bitter and kept many surprises for everyone. The communist economic model had to be renovated or radically changed, something that had a striking effect on Russia’s most important sector, the energy complex. All of today’s Russian energy giants started life as divisions of the Soviet Ministry of Oil. Each held responsibility for developing a compact geographic region, while they relied on other state ministries for their inputs (exploration, construction, equipment, supplies) and provided crude oil to yet another ministry to be refined and distributed to consumers and other clients. Not only the system was cumbersome, but it was highly centralized and relied on decisions that most of the times destroyed in some extent the production capacity. However, as the USSR fragmented and production numbers declined dangerously, Moscow started to allow some slack for economic experimentation. That was the environment that permitted few people to become billionaires, while it highlighted the path to the future. Less control form the central government meant radical proposals, and one of them permitted the creation of what would become Lukoil. The managements of three West Siberian producing associations (Langepasneftegaz, Uranyneftegaz and Kogalymneftegaz) asked to secede from the oil ministry and form a joint stock company. Lukoil was established in November 1991 as a state owned oil and gas concern, while each of the producing associations gave an initial letter to form the company name At the time, the new company reflected the ambition of the Soviet Ministry of Oil and Gas, led by Vagit Alekperov 1, to create a vertically integrated energy major modeled on Italy’s ENI.
    [Show full text]