Conservation Assessment for Arctic Raspberry (Rubus acaulis) Michx. USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region May 2002 This Conservation Assessment/Approach was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on the subject taxon or community; or this document was prepared by another organization and provides information to serve as a Conservation Assessment for the Eastern Region of the Forest Service. It does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service. Though the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if you have information that will assist in conserving the subject taxon, please contact the Eastern Region of the Forest Service Threatened and Endangered Species Program at 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 580 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. Conservation Assessment for Artic Raspberry (Rubus acaulis) Michx. 2 Table Of Contents INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES .........................................................................4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................5 NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY..............................................................6 SPECIES DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................7 GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION .........................................................................8 RANGE-WIDE DISTRIBUTION ..........................................................................8 HABITAT AND ECOLOGY..................................................................................9 LIFE HISTORY.....................................................................................................14 POPULATION BIOLOGY AND VIABILITY...................................................17 POTENTIAL THREATS......................................................................................18 SUMMARY OF EXISTING HABITAT PROTECTION .................................19 MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION ISSUES.........................................19 PRACTICAL USES...............................................................................................20 RESEARCH AND MONITORING .....................................................................21 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................22 REFERENCES.......................................................................................................22 Conservation Assessment for Artic Raspberry (Rubus acaulis) Michx. 3 INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on Rubus acaulis Michx. (arctic raspberry or nagoonberry). This is an administrative study only and does not represent a management decision or direction by the U. S. Forest Service. Though the best scientific information available was gathered and reported in preparation of this document, then subsequently reviewed by subject experts, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if the reader has information that will assist in conserving the subject taxon, please contact the Eastern Region of the Forest Service Threatened and Endangered Species Program at 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. The National Forest Management Act and USDA Forest Service policy and require that National Forest Service lands be managed to maintain viable populations of all native plant and animal species. A viable population is one that has established populations and a distribution of reproductive individuals sufficient to ensure the continued existence of the species throughout its range within a given planning area. In addition to those species listed as Endangered or Threatened under the Endangered Species Act, or Species of Concern by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Forest Service lists species that are sensitive within each region – Regional Forester Sensitive Species (RFSS). A designation of “sensitive” affords some additional regulatory protection. Rubus acaulis is a Regional Forester Sensitive Species (RFSS) in the Eastern Region of the National Forests. It is listed as an R9 (Region 9) Sensitive Species on the Hiawatha National Forest. As this is a Conservation Assessment for the Eastern Region, the emphasis in this document is focused on that area. However, information for Colorado and Wyoming is included also, because R. acaulis is rare in those states as well. Little to no information could be found regarding occurrences of R. acaulis in the other states/provinces where it is found, though the information that was found was included in this document. The objectives of this document are to: 1. Provide an overview of current scientific knowledge for this species. 2. Provide a summary of the distribution and status of this species, both rangewide and within the Eastern Region of the National Forests. 3. Provide the available background information needed to prepare a subsequent Conservation Approach. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Rubus acaulis Michx. (nagoonberry) is a boreal species found in northern Alaska, throughout most of Canada from the Yukon and Northwest Territories to Ontario and Quebec primarily between 50o and 60oN latitude. It also occurs from the mountains of British Columbia and Alberta south to the Rocky Mountains (elev. 7000-9700) of Montana, Wyoming, and Colorado. In the mid-west it grows in Minnesota, and Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. Confusion has persisted as to whether R. acaulis is a species or merely a subspecies of Rubus arcticus. Conservation Assessment for Artic Raspberry (Rubus acaulis) Michx. 4 Currently Rubus arcticus is described from Europe and Asia along with Alaska. Studies done on Rubus arcticus may help us understand about the life history of Rubus acaulis. The major threat in our area may be climate warming as R. acaulis is likely a remnant of colder climates; its normal range is further north in Canada. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Outside Reviewers – We would like to thank our academic reviewers and agency reviewers outside of the U. S. Forest Service for their helpful comments and corrections on this manuscript. Hanes Trust Fund – We thank the Hanes Trust for their support in funding this project. Initial Draft – We are grateful to Beverly Braden, contract botanist, for her efforts in providing us with an original draft for this Conservation Assessment. Herbarium and Heritage Data – We appreciate the sharing of occurrence information for this species from Heritage personnel both in the United States and Canada, along with the helpful assistance of Herbarium personnel. See Contacts section at end of report for a complete list. Editorial Committee – We thank Jan Schultz, of the Hiawatha National Forest, for her suggestions and patience through numerous revisions. Literature Search - We thank Laura Hutchinson of the North Central Research Library for performing initial species inquires and sending us relevant research articles, Jan Schultz, of the Hiawatha National Forest, for use of her extensive library of materials to begin to compile information on this species, Donna Peppin, a contract horticulturist, for additional literature searches at the Northern Michigan University in Marquette and Beverly Braden, a contract botanist, for additional literature searches at Michigan State University in East Lansing and the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, and for the preparation of an initial draft of this conservation assessment. Conservation Assessment for Artic Raspberry (Rubus acaulis) Michx. 5 NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY (USDA NRCS Plant profile 2001, W-20). Order: Rosales Family: Rosaceae Subgenus: Cylactis Scientific name: Rubus acaulis Michx. USDA NRCS Plant Code: RUAC Common names: nagoonberry, short-stemmed raspberry, dwarf raspberry, northern dwarf raspberry, arctic raspberry, northern blackberry Synonym: Rubus arcticus ssp. acaulis Focke Cylactis arctica (L.) ssp. acaulis W.A. Weber Rubus arcticus var. acaulis (Michx.) Boivin Rubus arcticus var. grandiflorus Ledeb. Rubus arcticus ssp. stellatus var. acaulis [Michx.] B. Boi Taxonomy notes This species is sometimes included in the circumpolar Rubus arcticus L., from which it differs in relatively minor attributes. Narrower stipiles, single flower below the leaves, an absence of gland on the peduncles, and longer petals on R. acaulis are the distinguishing characteristics (Soper & Heimburger 1982). Rubus arcticus ssp. arcticus is described by Hultén as having 1-3 flowers, the uppermost usually overtopping the leaves; peduncles often glandular; calyx tube pubescent, petals short and broad (Hultén 1968). R. arcticus is also described as having richly flavored fruit which is used for jam and flavoring liqueur (Hultén 1968) whereas Rubus arcticus ssp. acaulis is edible but not as richly flavored (Ryynanen 1972). Welsh (1974) commented on western varieties and subspecies, “attempts have been made to segregate R. arcticus into varieties or subspecies”. Criteria such as sepal form or pubescence, flower number and height were variable so Welsh (1974) recommended only recognizing Rubus arcticus for Alaska and western Canada. Hultén considers the complex of arcticus, acaulis, and stellatus (Alaskan bramble)