DOCSLIB.ORG

Modelling Risk Management Process According to ISO Standard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modelling Risk Management Process According to ISO Standard International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-8 Issue-2, July 2019 Modelling Risk Management Process According to ISO Standard Ikram Akkiyat, Nissrine Souissi section we present an overview of the different approaches Abstract: Risk management is defined as an essential step in that describe the activities of several risk management the improvement process proposed under the standard ISO 9001: processes. A comparative analysis of these approaches is 2015. The guidelines to the process of risk management have been presented in the third section. The fourth section concerns the proposed since 2009 by the International Standardization building of our risk management process meta-model. We Organization (ISO). But before, organization and institutions have their own way to manage risk. An analysis of risk finish this paper by a conclusion and perspectives. management processes in the literature has been realized in order to identify the standard process. Unified Modeling language II. OVERVIEW OF RISK MANAGEMENT (UML) was used to present this meta model. The purpose of this APPROACHES paper is to propose a risk management process model based on ISO 31000: 2018 and following the recommendations of ISO In this section, we present the main approaches addressing 9001: 2015 by integrating risk management modeling in process the risk management, such as: the standards ISO 9001: 2015, modeling. ISO 21500: 2012, ISO 27001: 2013, ISO 20000-1: 2011 and ISO 31000: 2018 risk management standard. In addition to Index Terms: Process Modelling; Model; UML; Risk these standards, we are presenting demarches proposed by Management Process; ISO Standards; ISO 31000:2018; ISO PMBOK 6th Edition, NIST (National Institute of Standards 9001:2015; and technology - USA) and HSE (Health and Safety Executive - UK). The ISO 31000 standard provides I. INTRODUCTION principles and guidelines on risk management. This standard The term ―risk in an organization represents the effect of has become a generic and recognized reference for risk uncertainty on objectives [1], and its management is an management. The standard ISO 31000: 2018 can be used for essential step in order to optimize and improve the processes any field, it is not specific to an industry or a sector [2] composing the whole system. Risk management is part of the [3].The international community involved in its review process of the strategic management in an organization, recognizes its importance and its positioning with regard to taking into account the importance of the contributions and its guidelines and its unifying purpose. It seems to be the influence of the environment. Risk management is complementary to the different standards applicable to any defined as the set of coordinated activities to direct and sector, such as ISO 9001, and can easily allow the control an organization with regard to risk [1]. Before that implementation of a risk management system. ISO (International Standardization Organization) offered a Other ISO standards, which at the base are not dedicated to standard of management of risk in 2009, agencies had used risk management, had integrated in their latest editions, a different methods to manage risks within their entities. In risk-based approach. 2015, the risk management has been recommended by the The concept of risk in the ISO 9001 standard has been ISO9001: 2015 as being an important step in the implicit in previous editions, and it is explicit in the 2015 improvement process of an organization. It relies on the edition [4]. We emphasize here that ISO 9001: 2015 provides definition, assessment and implementation of corrective requirements for quality management systems, and is aligned actions in order to avoid or correct the consequences of the with the changes that organizations face, focusing more on risk. In this paper, we propose a meta-model of risk performance, reflection based on risk and activation of the management process, based on the standard ISO 31000: cycle Plan-Do-Check-Act at all levels of the organization [4]. 2018, which will facilitate the implementation of the risk In the same way as the ISO 9001:2015, ISO 21500:2012 management process in any type of business process and in provides a process for risk management in the framework of any field and in any domain of organizations. We suggest in the project lifecycle [5]. This international standard provides this sense to follow the recommendations of ISO 9001: 2015 a high-level description of the concepts and processes and integrate risk modelling in business process modelling. considered as good practices in project management. This This work is organized into five sections; in the second standard is included as Part II of the PMBOK. It is admitted that the PMBOK Guide [6] had a great influence on the Revised Manuscript Received on July 30, 2019. development of the ISO 21500. In this context, as in PMBOK, Ikram Akkiyat, SIWEB Team, Ecole Mohammadia Des Ingénieurs, risk management is present during the process of planning, Mohammad V University of Rabat, Rabat, Morocco; implementation, and control of the project lifecycle. Nissrine Souissi, Computer Science Department Rabat School of Mines, Rabat, Morocco & SIWEB Team, Mohammadia School of Engineering, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco Published By: Retrieval Number: B3751078219/19©BEIESP Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering DOI: 10.35940/ijrte.B3751.078219 5830 & Sciences Publication Modelling Risk Management Process According to ISO Standard The process of assessment and treatment of risks related to III. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS information security in ISO/IEC 27001 aligns also with the In this section, we present a comparative analysis of principles and guidelines in the ISO 31000. ISO / IEC 27001 the approaches presented in the previous section, and we is the most well-known of the standards of the family ISO discuss the results of this analysis. 27000, which aims to assist organizations in the field of information security. ISO/IEC 27001 provides the A. Analysis requirements for an information security management system, A comparative analysis of standards covering the and includes people, processes and information systems by management of risks has been presented in [2], where it was applying a risk management process [7]. question to compare the activities of the risk management ISO/IEC 20000-1 which is a service management system process in the standards ISO 9001, ISO 21500, ISO/IEC standard, cites ISO 31000 as the generic reference to risk management [2]. The requirements that provide ISO 27001 and ISO/IEC 20000-1, and show that an approach of 20000-1:2011[8]include design, transition, delivery and risk management based on the process approach may improvement of services to meet the agreed requirements. constitute a basis for the improvement, coordination and The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) interoperability of the activities of risk management in IT, in [9]proposes a method of risk management through the order to achieve several aspects, such as: project proposal of several activities similar to those proposed in the management, quality management and the security of framework of ISO 31000:2018 [9]. It’s about framing risk, information systems. We present in what follows an enriched assessing, proposing solutions and finally risk monitoring. version which compares all approaches cited in the previous The Health and Safety Executive [11] proposes a risk section, with the process of management of the risks defined assessment process consisting of five activities: Identification in ISO 31000:2018. of probabilities, assessment of risks and proposal of solutions The standard ISO 31000:2018 contains 10 chapter, and precautions, saving important data and finally reviewing th the assessment and repeating the process if necessary. we are here focusing on the 6 chapter which is ―Process‖, since this new release in organized as a High Level Standard (HLS). Table 1 shows the comparative analysis: Table I: Comparison of different risk management processes Risk Management processes ISO ISO ISO ISO ISO/IEC PMBOK NIST HSE - UK 31000:2009 9001:2015 21500:2013 20000-1:2011 27001:2013 6th Edition 4.2 4.2 6.2 Understanding 4.3.40 Understanding Communicatio the needs and Manage the needs and n and expectations of communicatio expectations of consultation interested ns interested parties parties 4.1 5.3 1. Plan Risk Understanding 1. Frame the Scope, Context Managemen the organization risk Processes’activities and criteria t and its context 6.3.2 Defining 3.11 Project the scope constraints 4.1 Understanding the organization and its context 6.3.3 External and Internal A.8 Control of Context externally 3.5.2 Factors provided outside the processes, organizational products and boundary services 6.3.4 Defining risk criteria Published By: Retrieval Number: B3751078219/19©BEIESP Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering DOI: 10.35940/ijrte.B3751.078219 5831 & Sciences Publication International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-8 Issue-2, July 2019 6.1.2 Information security risk 6.3.1 Service assessment continuity and 6.2 Information 5.4 availability security 2. Assess the Risk requirements objectives and risk assessment 6.6.1 plans to achieve Information them security policy 8.2 Information security risk assessment (operation) 6.1 6.6.3 Actions to 6.1.2 6.4.2 Information 1. Identify address risks 4.3.28 Information 2. Identify Risk security the and Identify risks security risk Risks identification changes and hazards opportunities assessment (c) incidents (6.1.1) 3. Perform Qualitative 6.1.2 Risk 2. Decide 9.1.3 6.4.3 4.3.29 Information Analysis who might Analysis and Risk analysis Assess risks security risk 4. Perform be harmed evaluation assessment (d) Quantitative and how Risk Analysis 3. Evaluate 6.1.2 9.1.3 the risks 6.4.4 4.3.29 Information Analysis and and decide Risk evaluation Assess risks security risk evaluation on assessment (e) precaution s 6.1.3 6.1 Information Actions to security risk 6.5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CVIT-2021-Traning-Ca
    ICT TRAINING, SOLUTIONS & EXAMS TESTING CENTER CORPORATE HEAD OFFICE 212 Ikorodu Road Palmgroove Bus Stop Lagos Nigeria [email protected] www.cvitnigeria.com cvitnigeria cvitnigeria cvitnigeria ABOUT US CVIT Nigeria is a premier training and certification company that provides a wide range of IT training tools and resources that are committed to maximize the functionality and efficiency of professionals technologically. At CVIT Nigeria, we believe that training should be positive and productive with sound quality and well planned with clear objectives to enhance the professional. We have been providing training to individuals and corporate organizations from small, medium and large-scale organizations by our certified and experienced facilitators that have years of industries based knowledge, as they all seek and strive to boast and improve their productivity, efficiency and capacity to enhance a high definitive output in their various field of endeavors. Our experience in training covers all sectors as we have wide range of courses on ICT. MICROSOFT DESKTOP TECHNOLOGIES DESKTOP ENTRY LEVEL: IT INFRASTRUCTURE - TAKE THIS COURSE AND EARN A MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATE (MTA) CERTIFICATION COURSE NAME DURATION COST JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV Course 40349A: Windows Operating 5 Days 18-22 15-19 12-16 7-11 9-13 11-15 6-10 System Fundamentals: MTA Exam 98-349 ASSOCIATE LEVEL: WINDOWS 10 Course 20698A: Installing and 5 Days 22-26 5-9 14-17 16-20 2-6 3-7 Configuring Windows 10 Course 20697-1C: Implementing and Managing Windows 10
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Management Engineering Editors: Hernández, Cesáreo (Ed.)
    © 2017 Advances in Management Engineering Editors: Hernández, Cesáreo (Ed.) El libro recoge el texto final de ponencias presentadas al Workshop: THE NEW INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION: CHALLENGES IN THE XXI CENTURY 23th October, 2015 Valladolid, Spain. Escuela de Ingenierías Industriales, Promovido por INSISOC, el Workshop, tenía por objetivo facilitar el intercambio de ideas entre colegas del campo de la Ingeniería de Organización para el diseño de una Nueva Organización Industrial que pueda ser útil para resolver los retos del siglo XXI. El libro se divide en cuatro partes, acomodando el currículo histórico de Ingeniería de Organización en la Ingeniería Industrial. Part I Management Engineering and Organizational Sciences. Part II The Governance System of the Firm. Part III Heuristics, Intelligent Systems and Agent Based Modelling. Part IV Innovative Teaching Activities in Management Engineering. En la página del libro http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319558882 puede descargarse gratuitamente el Prefacio y la relación de capítulos. El libro es la parte académica de un día inolvidable para el editor, que tuvo también su parte cultural y gastronómica. Como Editor, felicito a los compañeros que me sorprendieron con este homenaje de jubilación y a todos los que compartieron ese día y nos regalaron sus ideas. Mi agradecimiento se extiende a quienes respondieron a la convocatoria con su presencia o con su adhesión y a quienes han compartido a lo largo de los años enseñanzas y amistad. Cesáreo Hernández Iglesias INSISOC Valladolid Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering Cesáreo Hernández Editor Advances in Management Engineering Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering Series editor Adolfo López-Paredes, Valladolid, Spain This bookseries provides a means for the dissemination of current theoretical and applied research in the areas of Industrial Engineering & Engineering Management.
    [Show full text]
  • Insights Risk Resilience
    Insights Risk Resilience ISSUE 01 / APRIL 2016 When Standards MatterMatter. Insights 22 Intro ISSUE 01 / APRIL 2016 They say that there is nothing more important than being fully equipped with the right knowledge, expertise, and resources to provide your customers satisfactory products and/ or services. But what is more important is the recognition of the dedication and hard work your 28 organization invests day-in and 10 day-out to not only meet customer expectations, but also exceed them. Everyday PECB is one step closer 34 to our vision of a world where best practices are widely disseminated, accessible, affordable, known and used. Our mission to enhance the accessibility of standards, compliance and education for people and organizations by 04 Why Risk Resilience? reducing the certification costs and widening the range for education and certification programs is 06 Risk Assessment in project Management gradually being accomplished. We will continue our journey to 10 Information Security in Banks and Financial Institutions support worldwide professionals that want to differentiate themselves, and follow best 14 Replacing OHSAS 18001 what will ISO 45001 Bring? practices based on internationally recognized standards. 18 Are You Metting Customer Expectations? Eric Lachapelle 22 Social Engineering and Risk From Cyber-Attacks CEO at PECB 14 28 Risk Assessment in Different Disciplines 30 Business Continuity with Cybersecurity 32 The Weakest Link in Information Security 34 News Flash 18 35 What’s Happening on Twitter In recent years, a rapid Before entering such market, it is very important to understand the needs, rules and strategies increase in foreign which help you to grow and increase profitability.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance on Project Management and PMBOK 6Th Guide
    Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, volume 108 5th IPMA SENET Project Management Conference (SENET 2019) Analysis and comparison of ISO 21500 - Guidance on project management and PMBOK 6th Guide Jovana Čabarkapa Faculty of Organisational Sciences Belgrade, Serbia [email protected] Abstract—In today’s fast-changing environment, resources efficiently, bring results. There are too many changes are necessary if a company wants to survive on tools and practices that can be used. Difference the market. The ability of organisations to make and between different project management standards implement changes can be the key factor of success. exists, and many scientists and experts are constantly Projects and project management have a big role in this trying to bring something new in the field of project process. Many organisations have introduced different management. Labriet [1] highlighted the biggest standards for project management. So, today, there are differences and communalities between ISO and ANSI a few project management standards that can help standards. They have one common purpose, and that is organisations in directing a project into a regular and to help organisations to manage their projects. systematic framework. The main goal of this paper is to analyse and make a comparison between two of the most According to the problem, subject, objectives and popular versions of project management standards: ISO various requirements, research methods are also 21500 and PMBOK 6th Guide. A general overview of defined. All theory, or theoretical analysis, is based on differences and similarities, definitions of important the theories of mainly international professional terms of project management, project management literature (professional journals, articles, books, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Deployment Package – Software Requirements Analysis
    Deployment Package Integration Systems Engineering Basic Profile Notes: This document is the intellectual propriety of its author’s organization. However, information contained in this document is free of use. The distribution of all or parts of this document is authorized for non commercial use as long as the following legal notice is mentioned: © International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) Commented [J1]: Why is the footer dated 2013? Commercial use of this document is strictly forbidden. This document is distributed in order to enhance exchange of technical and scientific information. This material is furnished on an “as-is” basis. The author(s) make(s) no warranties of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to any matter including, but not limited to, warranty of fitness for purpose or merchantability, exclusivity, or results obtained from use of the material. The process described in this Deployment Package is not intended to preclude or discourage the use of additional processes that Very Small Entities may find useful. Author(s) Name, - INCOSE, name of country Claude Y. LAPORTE – École de technologie supérieure (ÉTS), (Canada) Editors Martin GEISREITER – INCOSE, Germany To be completed Creation date Day-Month-year (e.g. 12 June 2012) Last update Day-Month-year Version X.X © INCOSE 2013 Deployment Package - Integration Page 2 / 21 Version <X.X> Version History Date Version Description Author (dd/mm/yyyy) <dd/mmm/yy> <x.x> Initial Release <name> Abbreviations/Acronyms Abre./Acro. Definitions DP Deployment Package - a set of artefacts developed to facilitate the implementation of a set of practices, of the selected framework, in a Very Small Entity.
    [Show full text]
  • ICT Terminology Handbook
    BICSI's ICT Terminology Handbook Version 2.0 We welcome all comments about BICSI's ICT Terminology Handbook. If you have any questions about BICSI and its services, please contact our office at 800.242.7405 (USA/Canada toll free); +1 813.979.1991; fax +1 813.971.4311; e-mail [email protected]; website www.bicsi.org. BICSI®, Tampa, FL 33637 © 2017 BICSI® All rights reserved. Version 2.0 published 2017 First printing January 2015 Printed in the United States of America All rights reserved ISBN (Electronic) 1-928886-68-X All brand names, trademarks, and registered trademarks are the property of their respective holders. No part of this publication may be used, reproduced, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without prior agreement and written permission from BICSI. The contents of this publication are subject to revision without notice due to continued progress in information and communications technology (ICT) systems methodology, design, and manufacturing. THIS PUBLICATION IS SOLD AS IS, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, RESPECTING THE CONTENTS OF THIS PUBLICATION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO IMPLIED WARRANTIES FOR THE PUBLICATION’S QUALITY, PERFORMANCE, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. BICSI SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO THE PURCHASER OR ANY OTHER ENTITY WITH RESPECT TO ANY LIABILITY, LOSS, OR DAMAGE CAUSED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY BY THIS PUBLICATION. BICSI World Headquarters 8610 Hidden River Parkway Tampa, FL 33637-1000 USA Tel.: +1 813.979.1991 or Tel.: 800.242.7405 (USA & Canada toll-free) Fax: +1 813.971.4311 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.bicsi.org This publication is not a single source document but a compendium of many sources of ICT industry-related terminology.
    [Show full text]
  • Maximizing the Benefits of ISO 21500 Implementation
    International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 5, No. 9(1); August 2014 Maximizing the Benefits of ISO 21500 Implementation Lára Kristín Kristinsdóttr Department of Business Administration and Environmental and Natural Resources University of Iceland Eðvald Möller Department of Business Administration University of Iceland Abstract The objective of this article is to examine what needs to be considered if implementation of ISO 21500 is sought. There are four points that this article focuses on for organizations to consider before implementing ISO 21500. These are: the reasons behind implementation, what might stand in the way of completing the implementation process, realizing the benefits it might bring and what might be the optimum implementation strategy. The results show that to maximize the benefits of incorporating ISO 21500 it is necessary to have the top management committed to achieving the standard, decisions must be made on important subjects like documentation and communication, and proper training must be given to employees so they are capable of incorporating the standard into their daily work. Keywords: Project management, structure, certification, quality, ISO 21500, processes, implementation 1. Introduction Project management is becoming increasingly popular among organizations today since more organizations have become project orientated with every year. As a result, “One-fifth of the world’s GDP, or more than $12 trillion, will be spent on projects each year in the decade 2010–2020” (Stellingwerf & Zandhuis, 2013). People working with complex processes and with concepts that are often hard to understand are involved in these projects. With the increased demand and pressure, the International Standard Organization (ISO) decided to publish a project management standard, ISO 21500, to make those processes and concepts more comprehensible and more widely available for companies to cooperate more efficiently.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing PMBOK® Guide 4Th Edition, PMBOK® Guide 5Th Edition and ISO 21500
    Project Management Training Company Comparing PMBOK® Guide 4th Edition, PMBOK® Guide 5th Edition and ISO 21500 STS Sauter Training & Simulation S.A. Avenue de la Gare 10 | 1003 Lausanne | Switzerland Web: www.sts.ch | E-mail: [email protected] | Phone: +41 21 510 11 50 A company CONTENTS 1 Foreword from the Author ................................................................................. 2 2 Executive summary .......................................................................................... 3 3 Process organization in the standards ................................................................. 4 4 Summary of the major changes TO processes ..................................................... 8 5 Detailed analysis .............................................................................................. 9 5.1 Project Integration Management .................................................................. 9 5.2 Project Scope Management ....................................................................... 12 5.3 Project Time Management ........................................................................ 14 5.4 Project Cost Management ......................................................................... 16 5.5 Project Quality Management ..................................................................... 17 5.6 Project Human Resource Management ........................................................ 18 5.7 Project Communications Management ........................................................ 20 5.8 Project
    [Show full text]
  • ANSI ISO TC Proposal (Project Management)
    PROPOSAL FOR NEW FIELD OF ISO TECHNICAL WORK (TSP) TSP Number Document Number Date of circulation Closing date of voting Proposer ANSI Proposed secretariat ANSI REQUIRED PROPOSAL INFORMATION Note 1: Proposals for new fields of ISO or IEC work or for new work item proposals within committees shall include the following fields of justification information (to be developed and submitted by the proposer) when relevant to the proposal (please note that the proposer is not required to provide all of this information if elements of it are not relevant to the proposal). 1. The issue (A simple and concise statement describing the business, technological, societal or environmental issue that the proposal seeks to address, preferably linked to the Strategic Business Plan of the concerned ISO or IEC committee in the case of a NWIP.) Project management, program management, and portfolio management are management approaches that allow organizations within any market sector to connect their organizational strategy to successful project outcomes. These three areas are often referred to collectively as the project management field or simply as project management. Project management system standards have broad application within all market sectors and within both private and public organizations. (A distinction is made between financial portfolios and project portfolios, the latter is used to tie organizational strategies to the successful outcomes of projects.) On a global scale the business community is experiencing increased customer expectations relating
    [Show full text]
  • Deciphering the Dolphin Language Appendix U 1
    Deciphering the Dolphin Language Appendix U 1 by James T. Fulton U.1 Introduction 1 The goal of this appendix is to report the evidence related to the eternal question of whether the dolphin, and 2 particularly the bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus, unless otherwise indicated, employs what is traditionally 3 described as language in English. If it logically does, the secondary goal is to define the next steps in deciphering 4 that language. 5 This appendix is subsidiary to “Hearing: A 21st Century Paradigm” and the website Processes in Biological Hearing. 6 There is a limitation in the vocabulary used in the linguistic community revolving around the multiple uses of the 7 word language. This work will separate the word language used as a noun and the word language used as an 8 adjective. As an adjective, it will be used to delineate a language protocol (neural software) that is coupled with a 9 vocalization capability (physiological hardware or plant) that together support language (used as a noun) to describe 10 both intraspecies communications and interspecies communications (under more complex conditions). 11 - - - - 12 Human academicians of one linguistic school have long argued that only humans employ language; all lower 13 animals only communicate. In a 1980 text2, Herman & Tavolga (Chap. 4) reviewed the literature of this linguistic 14 school from the communications perspective and Herman (Chap. 8) reviewed the similar literature related to the 15 cognitive capabilities of the dolphin. Herman noted (page 409), “The recent demonstration s of language-learning 16 capabilities in Pongidae (with a string of citations and using 1980 cladogram) reveal that most and possibly all of the 17 design features of human language are present in the learned linguistic transactions of the apes.
    [Show full text]
  • CERC2016 Proceedings
    Mathildenhöhe © Ulrich Mathias, Wissenschaftsstadt Darmstadt CERC2016 Collaborative European Research Conference Cork Institute of Technology – Cork, Ireland 23 - 24 September 2016 www.cerc–conf.eu Proceedings 22 Extended - Abstracts and 14 selected Full Papers Version 2 (January 2017) Editors : Udo Bleimann Bernhard Humm Robert Loew Ingo Stengel Paul Walsh ISSN : 2220 - 4164 Hints : - Topics in the table of content are linked to page where that abstract begins. - The page number at the end of all pages is linked to begin of table of content. 2 Table of Content Table of Content Keynote »Standards or Excellence in Project Management ?« 12 Prof. Dr. Nino Grau Extended Abstracts and selected Full Papers Chapter 1 Business Suitable Financing in the Context of a High-Tech (Semiconductor) Start-up 14 Mahbub, Maaskant, Wright A Port-Centric Logistic Supply Chain for Container Traffic: The Case for the 15 Port of Cork Company? O’Callaghan, Wright Galloping Technology: What risks? The Customer Service & Engagement 16 Dynamic. Ryan W., Wright Chapter 2 Business Information Systems The Application of Real Time Analytics Technologies for the Predictive 20 Maintenance of Industrial Facilities in Internet of Things (IoT) Environments Rieger, Regier, Stengel, Clarke Practical Relevance and Operational Scenarios of Semantic Wikis 26 Coym, Ertelt, Bleimann Industry 4.0 national and international 30 Ehlers, Bleimann, Loew 3 Table of Content Chapter 3 Applied Computing A Clinical Decision Support System for Personalized Medicine 34 Idelhauser, Humm, Beez,
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Training Calendar with Cost Figures.Cdr
    ICT TRAINING, SOLUTIONS & EXAMS TESTING CENTER CORPORATE HEAD OFFICE Genesys Place, 30, Oba-Akran Avenue, Opposite EcoBank, Ikeja, Lagos State. [email protected] www.cvitnigeria.com cvitnigeria cvitnigeria cvitnigeria ABOUT US CVIT Nigeria is a premier training and certification company that provides a wide range of IT training tools and resources that are committed to maximize the functionality and efficiency of professionals technologically. At CVIT Nigeria, we believe that training should be positive and productive with sound quality and well planned with clear objectives to enhance the professional. We have been providing training to individuals and corporate organizations from small, medium and large-scale organizations by our certified and experienced facilitators that have years of industries based knowledge, as they all seek and strive to boast and improve their productivity, efficiency and capacity to enhance a high definitive output in their various field of endeavors. Our experience in training covers all sectors as we have wide range of courses on ICT. MICROSOFT DESKTOP TECHNOLOGIES DESKTOP ENTRY LEVEL: IT INFRASTRUCTURE - TAKE THIS COURSE AND EARN A MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATE (MTA) CERTIFICATION COURSE NAME DURATION COST JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Course 40349A: Windows Operating 5 Days 22-26 19-23 9-13 4-8 13-17 17-19 3-7 System Fundamentals: MTA Exam 98-349 ASSOCIATE LEVEL: WINDOWS 10 Course 20698A: Installing and 5 Days 19-23 9-13 11-15 6-10 2-6 3-7 Configuring Windows 10 Course 20697-1C: Implementing
    [Show full text]