DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix C: Special Status Species Summary Tables

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix C: Special Status Species Summary Tables Half Moon Bay - Local Coastal Land Use Plan Appendix C Appendix C: Special Status Species Summary Tables The following tables summarize special status species that are present or are likely to be present in the Half Moon Bay Planning Area. Table C-1 is specific to animal species, and Table C-2 is specific to plant species. TABLE C-1: SPECIAL STATUS ANIMAL SPECIES WITH POTENTIAL TO OCCUR IN HALF MOON BAY PLANNING AREA OCCURRENCE IN HALF MOON BAY ANIMAL SPECIES STATUS FED/STATE HABITAT PLANNING AREA Monarch Butterfly -/CR Winter roost sites extend along the Winter roosts have been located (Danaus plexippus) coast from northern Mendocino to within Eucalyptus groves at (Wintering sites) Baja California. Roosts are typically Sweetwood Group Camp area, within located in wind-protected groves of Wavecrest near Magnolia Avenue Eucalyptus, Monterey pine or (site has been inactive in recent Monterey cypress, with nectar and years), and at other areas with water sources nearby. Native tree location information suppressed due species are typically preferred for to their sensitivity. their higher habitat value. City Council Final Review Draft September 2020 C-1 Half Moon Bay - Local Coastal Land Use Plan Appendix C OCCURRENCE IN HALF MOON BAY ANIMAL SPECIES STATUS FED/STATE HABITAT PLANNING AREA San Bruno Elfin FE/-- Found in coastal, mountainous areas No records for the Planning Area and Butterfly (Incisalia with grassy ground cover, mainly in no suitable habitat. Nearest records mossii bayensis), the vicinity of San Bruno Mountain. are from the vicinity of Montara Colonies are located on steep, north- Mountain. facing slopes within the fog belt. Larval host plant is Sedum spathulifolium. Steelhead - Central CA FT/-- Well-oxygenated streams with Pilarcitos Creek and Frenchmans Coast ESU riffles; loose, silt-free gravel Creek are historic spawning streams (Oncorhynchus mykiss) substrate. ESU encompasses for Steelhead. Pilarcitos Creek, drainages in San Francisco and San Frenchmans Creek, Arroyo Leon and Pablo Bays east to the Napa River. Apanolio Creek within the Planning Area are designated Critical Habitat for Steelhead. Tidewater Goby FE/CSC Found in brackish water habitats Potential habitat may occur during (Eucyclogobius along the California coast from San portions of the year when tidal newberryi) Diego County to the mouth of the lagoons form at the mouth of Smith River. Found in shallow Pilarcitos Creek, but the species has lagoons and lower stream reaches. never been documented in the Needs fairly still but not stagnant Planning Area. Nearest record is from water and high oxygen levels. San Gregorio Creek in 1996. California Red-legged FT/CSC Mostly in lowlands and foothills Breeding sites are located at the Frog in/near permanent sources of deep Caltrans mitigation site near the SAM (Rana draytonii) water but will disperse far during plant, City property near the City and after rain. Prefers shorelines Corporation Yard and at the Half with extensive vegetation. Moon Bay Golf Links (Ocean Course). Has been documented in Pilarcitos City Council Final Review Draft September 2020 C-2 Half Moon Bay - Local Coastal Land Use Plan Appendix C OCCURRENCE IN HALF MOON BAY ANIMAL SPECIES STATUS FED/STATE HABITAT PLANNING AREA Creek, Frenchmans Creek, Arroyo Cañada Verde, at Wavecrest, the Casa del Mar neighborhood, and elsewhere. Santa Cruz black --/CSC Mixed deciduous and coniferous No observations within the Planning salamander woodlands and coastal grasslands in Area. Nearest occurrence is at (Aneides niger) San Mateo, Santa Cruz and Santa Huddart Park in Woodside. Clara Counties. Adults are found under rocks, talus, and damp woody debris. California giant --/CSC Known from wet coastal forests near No observations within the Planning salamander streams and seeps from Mendocino Area Nearest occurrence is at the end (Dicamptodon ensatus) County south to Monterey County of Purisima Creek Road near and east to Napa County. Aquatic Purisima Creek Redwoods Open larvae are found in cold, clear Space Preserve. Also known from the streams, occasionally in lakes and Tunitas Creek watershed southeast of ponds. Adults are found in wet Half Moon Bay. forests under rocks and logs near streams and lakes. Western Pond Turtle -/CSC Aquatic turtle of ponds, marshes, No known records within Half Moon (Emmys marmorata) rivers, streams, and irrigation Bay, but suitable habitat for this ditches with aquatic vegetation. species occurs within the City. Needs basking sites and suitable City Council Final Review Draft September 2020 C-3 Half Moon Bay - Local Coastal Land Use Plan Appendix C OCCURRENCE IN HALF MOON BAY ANIMAL SPECIES STATUS FED/STATE HABITAT PLANNING AREA upland habitat for egg-laying (sandy banks or grassy open fields). San Francisco Garter FE/CE, CFP Found in vicinity of freshwater Documented as occurring near the Snake marshes, ponds and slow-moving mouth of Pilarcitos Creek and along (Thamnophis sirtalis streams in San Mateo County. Pilarcitos Creek near downtown. U.S. tetrataenia) Prefers dense cover and water Fish and Wildlife Service found depths of at least one foot. Also suitable dispersal habitat for this requires uplands near aquatic species in Wavecrest and nearby habitats. areas, Pacific Ridge, Beachwood. Northern Harrier -/CSC Coastal salt marsh and freshwater San Mateo County Breeding Bird (Circus cyaneus) marsh; nests and forages in Atlas indicates past confirmed (nesting) grasslands; nests on ground in nesting just south of town near Verde shrubby vegetation, usually at marsh Road and probable past nesting just edge. north of town near El Granada. This is a regularly occurring species in Half Moon Bay in winter. Common in winter at Wavecrest and the open fields west of Railroad Avenue. White-tailed Kite -/CFP Open grassland and agricultural Breeding confirmed at Wavecrest (Elanus caeruleus) areas throughout Central California. south of Smith Field park. San Mateo (nesting) County Breeding Bird Atlas indicates possible past nesting near Miramontes Point. A regularly occurring species in winter. Common in winter at Wavecrest and the area City Council Final Review Draft September 2020 C-4 Half Moon Bay - Local Coastal Land Use Plan Appendix C OCCURRENCE IN HALF MOON BAY ANIMAL SPECIES STATUS FED/STATE HABITAT PLANNING AREA west of Railroad Avenue. Over 100 were counted in the fall of 2007. Sharp-shinned Hawk -/WL Breeds in ponderosa pine, black oak, San Mateo County Breeding Bird (Accipiter striatus) riparian deciduous, mixed conifer, Atlas recognizes possible past nesting (nesting) and Jeffrey pine habitats. Prefers, within Half Moon Bay. Breeding but not restricted to, riparian confirmed just north of town near El habitats. All habitats except alpine, Granada in 1993. A regularly open prairie, and bare desert used in occurring species in winter, winter. especially at Wavecrest. Cooper’s Hawk -/WL Nests primarily in deciduous San Mateo County Breeding Bird (Accipiter cooperii) riparian forests; forages in open Atlas indicates past confirmed (nesting) woodlands. nesting just south of Half Moon Bay near Verde Road, and possible nesting just north of town near El Granada and just east of town in Higgins Canyon. A regularly occurring species in winter, especially at Wavecrest. Ferruginous Hawk BCC/WL Inhabits open country. Winters in Winters in small numbers in the Half (Bueto regalis) small number along California coast Moon Bay area. Observed annually in (Wintering) and inland valleys. winter at Wavecrest and in the vicinity of the Half Moon Bay Airport. Swainson’s Hawk BCC/CT Breeds in stands with few trees in Occasionally found at Wavecrest in (Buteo swainsoni) juniper-sage flats, riparian corridors winter and fall migration. An (nesting) and oak savannah. Requires suitable individual of this species that spent adjacent foraging areas such as the winter of 1998-1999 at City Council Final Review Draft September 2020 C-5 Half Moon Bay - Local Coastal Land Use Plan Appendix C OCCURRENCE IN HALF MOON BAY ANIMAL SPECIES STATUS FED/STATE HABITAT PLANNING AREA grasslands or alfalfa or grain fields Wavecrest represents the first record supporting rodent populations. of overwintering Swainson’s hawk in coastal Northern California. Golden Eagle BCC/WL, CFP Typically frequents rolling foothills, Occasionally found in Half Moon Bay (Aquila chrysaetos) mountain areas, sage-juniper flats in winter. Has been found some (nesting and wintering) and desert. years at Wavecrest. American Peregrine Delisted, Inhabits open wetlands near cliffs, Species nests at Devils Slide and Falcon BCC/Delisted, CFP also occurs in some cities where winters in the area. Occasionally (Falco peregrinus) nests on buildings and bridges. found foraging in Half Moon Bay. (nesting) Merlin -/WL Breeds in Canada, winters in a Winters annually in small numbers in (Falco columbarius) variety of California habitats, Half Moon Bay. Found every winter in (wintering) including grasslands, savannahs, the area west of Railroad Avenue, wetlands, etc. Wavecrest, and the Half Moon Bay Golf Links. Western Snowy Plover FT, BCC/CSC Found on sandy beaches or marine Nests at Half Moon Bay State Beach, (Charadrius and estuarine shores; also salt pond which is designated as critical alexandrinus nivosus) levees and shores of large alkali habitat. Nesting assisted by Plover (nesting) lakes; requires sandy, gravelly or Watch Program run by State Parks friable soil substrate for nesting. with the help of Sequoia Audubon Threatened due to beachfront Society volunteers. Also winters on development, human disturbance, beaches in the area (40 to 60 can be off-leash dogs and other factors. City Council Final Review Draft September 2020 C-6 Half Moon Bay - Local Coastal Land Use Plan Appendix C OCCURRENCE IN HALF MOON BAY ANIMAL SPECIES STATUS FED/STATE HABITAT PLANNING AREA seen at Half Moon Bay State Beach each winter). Marbled Murrelet FT/CE Nests inland along the coast from Marbled Murrelets breed in the San (Brachyramphus Eureka to Oregon border and from Francisco Watershed in forests marmoratus) Half Moon Bay to Santa Cruz in old located within four miles of Half (nesting) growth redwood dominated forests, Moon Bay.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planning and Natural Resources Committee R-19
    PLANNING AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE R-19-140 October 22, 2019 AGENDA ITEM 2 AGENDA ITEM Addendum to the Mindego Hill Ranch Grazing Management Plan to Expand Conservation Grazing into the South Pasture GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION Forward a recommendation to the Board of Directors to adopt an addendum to the Mindego Hill Ranch Grazing Management Plan as an amendment to the Russian Ridge Use and Management Plan that adds the south pasture as part of the conservation grazing area on the property. SUMMARY The General Manager recommends adoption of an addendum to the Mindego Hill Ranch (Mindego) Grazing Management Plan (Grazing Plan) (Attachment 1) to expand the conservation grazing area within Russian Ridge Open Space Preserve (Russian Ridge). The addendum identifies the existing resources and current uses in the proposed south pasture expansion area, and provides recommendations for future improvements, management, and monitoring at the site. The recommendations include: installation of additional water infrastructure, updates to fencing, management of brush encroachment into grasslands, and monitoring of resource management activities. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District) staff and the current grazing tenant have been working with the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) to secure cost-sharing support for the anticipated improvements. Implementation of the recommended infrastructure improvements is estimated to cost $119,341, of which approximately $85,000 is projected to be the District’s share with the remainder funded by the NRCS. Recommended improvements would span four years with work anticipated to begin in July 2020. If approved, the District’s share would be allocated across the next four fiscal years and requested as part of the annual Budget and Action Plan development process.
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Butterfly Survey Data and Methodology from San Bruno Mountain Habitat Conservation Plan (1982–2000)
    Analysis of Butterfly Survey Data and Methodology from San Bruno Mountain Habitat Conservation Plan (1982–2000) 1. Status and Trends Travis Longcore Christine S. Lam John P. Wilson University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory Technical Report No. 1 Prepared for: Thomas Reid Associates 560 Waverly Street, Suite 201 Palo Alto, California 94301 Cover Photo: Lupines at San Bruno Mountain, March 2003 (T. Longcore) Preferred Citation: Longcore, T., C. S. Lam, and J. P. Wilson. 2004. Analysis of Butterfly Survey Data and Meth- odology from San Bruno Mountain Habitat Conservation Plan (1982–2000). 1. Status and Trends. University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory and Center for Sus- tainable Cities, Los Angeles, California. Summary Managers surveyed for sensitive butterfly species with the San Bruno Mountain Habitat Conservation Plan area between 1982 and 2000 using a haphazard “wandering tran- sect.” To extract as much valuable information as possible from the data collected by this suboptimal methodology we analyzed patterns of surveys and butterfly presence and absence within 250 m square cells gridded across the area within a Geographic In- formation System. While estimates of butterfly abundance were not possible, the data could be tested for trends in butterfly occupancy. For those cells surveyed during at least 10 years, no trends in the total number of occupied cells was evident for either Callippe silverspot butterfly or mission blue butterfly. There were cells, however, that showed positive or negative trends (p<0.2) in occupancy for each species (Callippe sil- verspot butterfly: 14 positive, 15 negative, 6 cells occupied all years; mission blue but- terfly: 40 positive; 40 negative, 2 cells occupied all years).
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
    San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan October 2019 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures.............................................................................................................................. ii Chapter 1: Governance ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Governance Team and Structure ...................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Coordinating Committee ......................................................... 1-2 1.2.2 Stakeholders .......................................................................... 1-3 1.2.2.1 Identification of Stakeholder Types ....................... 1-4 1.2.3 Letter of Mutual Understandings Signatories .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.1 Alameda County Water District ............................. 1-6 1.2.3.2 Association of Bay Area Governments ................. 1-6 1.2.3.3 Bay Area Clean Water Agencies .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.4 Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency ................................................................. 1-8 1.2.3.5 Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District .................................. 1-8 1.2.3.6 Contra Costa Water District .................................. 1-9 1.2.3.7
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Sensitive Plant Survey Results for the Valencia Commerce Center
    Dudek and Associates, Inc., "2002 Sensitive Plant Survey Results for the Valencia Commerce Center, Los Angeles County, California" (January 2003; 2002C) 2002 Sensitive Plant Survey Results Valencia Commerce Center J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 3 P R E P A R E D F O R : The Newhall Land and Farming Company 23823 Valencia Blvd. Valencia, CA 91355 P R E P A R E D B Y : Dudek & Associates, Inc. 605 Third Street Encinitas, CA 92024 2002 Sensitive Plant Survey Results for the Valencia Commerce Center Los Angeles County, California Prepared for: The Newhall Land and Farming Company 23823 Valencia Boulevard Valencia, CA 91355 Contact: Glenn Adamick Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, CA 92024 Contact: Mark A. Elvin (760) 942-5147 January 23, 2003 2002 Sensitive Plant Survey Results Valencia Commerce Center TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................1 2.1 Plant Communities and Land Covers ................................................................5 2.2 Geology and Soils ................................................................................................5 3.0 METHODS AND SURVEY LIMITATIONS..........................................................5 3.1 Literature Review ................................................................................................6 3.2 Field Reconnaissance Methods...........................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California
    1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California Prepared for: Premia Capital, LLC 801 Hamilton Street Redwood City, CA Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. January 18, 2019 1180 MAIN STREET PROJECT, CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY AND EVALUATION REPORT, REDWOOD CITY, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA This document entitled 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California was prepared by Stantec Inc. (“Stantec”) for the account of Premia Capital, LLC (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. Prepared by (signature) Joanne Grant, Archaeologist, MA, RPA Reviewed by (signature) John A. Nadolski, M.A. Approved
    [Show full text]
  • Central Coast
    Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Consultation History......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Action Area ..................................................................................................................... 32 2. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT: BIOLOGICAL OPINION AND INCIDENTAL TAKE STATEMENT ......................................................................................................... 34 2.1 Analytical Approach ....................................................................................................... 34 2.2 Life History and Range-wide Status of the Species and Critical Habitat ...................... 35 2.3 Environmental Baseline .................................................................................................. 48 2.4 Effects of the Action ........................................................................................................ 62 2.5 Cumulative Effects .......................................................................................................... 76 2.6 Integration and Synthesis ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo County BBE Final Report-2016.11.2
    Assessment and Management Prioritization Regime for the Bar-built Estuaries of San Mateo County Summary Report San Pedro Creek Prepared for: United States Fish and Wildlife Service San Francisco Area Coastal Program by: Central Coast Wetlands Group Moss Landing Marine Labs 8272 Moss Landing Rd. Moss Landing, CA 95039 November 2016 Summary Report: Bar-Built Estuaries of San Mateo County TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Figures and Tables .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Background and Need .................................................................................................................................... 3 What are BBEs and Why are they Important ............................................................................................................ 3 BBE are the most dominant estuarine resource on the San Mateo County coastline .............................................. 4 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 Methods .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Site Selection ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 203287 Cov Final Vol 1.Ai
    Summary Summary SUMMARY Sections Figures Tables S.1 Introduction and Purpose of S.1 Overview of SFPUC Regional S.1 WSIP Goals and Objectives the PEIR System and Water Supply Watersheds S.2 WSIP Facility Improvement S.2 Program Description Projects S.2 SFPUC Water Service Area – S.3 Environmental Effects San Francisco and SFPUC S.3 Summary of WSIP Facility Construction and Operation S.4 Areas of Controversy and Wholesale Customers Impacts Issues to be Resolved S.3 Annual Average Historical and S.4 Summary of Facility Mitigation S.5 Required Actions and Projected Customer Purchase Measures by Impact Approvals Requests S.5 Summary of Water Supply Impacts S.6 WSIP Variants S.4 WSIP Water Supply Sources, Nondrought Years and Mitigation Measures – S.7 Alternatives to the Proposed Tuolumne River System and Program S.5 WSIP Water Supply Sources, Downstream Water Bodies Drought Years S.6 Summary of Water Supply Impacts S.6a Location of WSIP Facility and Mitigation Measures – Improvement Projects – Sunol Alameda Creek Watershed Valley, Bay Division, Peninsula, and San Francisco Regions S.7 Summary of Water Supply Impacts and Mitigation Measures – S.6b Location of WSIP Facility Peninsula Watersheds Improvement Projects – San Joaquin Region S.8 Summary of Water Supply Impacts and Mitigation Measures – S.6c Location of WSIP Facility Westside Groundwater Basin Improvement Projects – Hetch Hetchy Region S.9 Summary of Water Supply Impacts and Mitigation Measures – S.7 Preliminary WSIP Construction Cumulative Water Supply Schedule S.1 Introduction and Purpose of the PEIR (Chapter 1) The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) proposes to adopt and implement the Water System Improvement Program (WSIP or proposed program) to increase the reliability of the regional water system that serves 2.4 million people in San Francisco and the San Francisco Bay Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Opinion for the Lower Crystal Springs Dam Stilling Basin Connecting Channel Project in San Mateo County, California (Corps File No
    March 21, 2019 Refer to NMFS No: WCRO-2016-00003 Katerina Galacatos, Ph.D. Acting Regulatory Branch Chief Department of the Army San Francisco District, Corps of Engineers 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 4th Floor, Suite 0134 San Francisco, California 94102-3406 Re: Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion for the Lower Crystal Springs Dam Stilling Basin Connecting Channel Project in San Mateo County, California (Corps File No. 2006-30317S) Dear Dr. Galacatos: Thank you for your letter of July 13, 2016, requesting initiation of consultation with NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) for the proposed Lower Crystal Springs Dam Stilling Basin Connecting Channel Project in the County of San Mateo, California (Project). The Corps of Engineers (Corps) proposes to provide authorization pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1972, as amended (33 U.S.C. § 1344 et seq.), to the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission to construct the Project. The enclosed biological opinion is based on our review of the proposed Project and describes NMFS’ analysis of the effects on threatened Central California Coast (CCC) steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in accordance with section 7 of the ESA. In the enclosed biological opinion, NMFS concludes the Project is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of threatened CCC steelhead. However, NMFS anticipates take of CCC steelhead will occur as a result of dewatering work areas during project construction. An incidental take statement with non-discretionary terms and conditions is included with the enclosed biological opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • Griffith Park Rare Plant Survey
    Cooper Ecological Monitoring, Inc. EIN 72-1598095 Daniel S. Cooper, President 5850 W. 3rd St. #167 Los Angeles, CA 90036 (323) 397-3562 [email protected] Griffith Park Rare Plant Survey Plummer's mariposa-lily Calochortus plummerae (CNPS 1B.2) blooms near Skyline Trail in the northeastern corner of Griffith Park, 26 May 2010 (ph. DSC). Prepared by: Daniel S. Cooper Cooper Ecological Monitoring, Inc. October 2010 1 Part I. Summary of Findings Part II (species accounts) begins after p. 26. We present information on extant occurrences of 15 special-status species, subspecies and/or varieties of vascular plants in Griffith Park and contiguous open space, including three for which no known local specimen existed prior to this study: slender mariposa-lily (Calochortus clavatus var. gracilis; CNPS 1B.2), Humboldt lily (Lilium humboldtii var. ocellatum; CNPS 4.2), and Hubby's phacelia (Phacelia hubbyi; CNPS 4.2). Using lists developed by local botanists, we document - from specimens or digital photographs - extant occurrences of nearly 40 additional plant taxa felt to be of conservation concern in the eastern Santa Monica Mountains, including 16 for which no prior specimen existed for the park or surrounding open space. We also identify several dozen taxa known from the specimen record but unconfirmed in the park in recent years. From this information, we discuss patterns of occurrence of rare plants in the park, drawing attention to "hotspots" for rare species diversity, such as Spring Canyon and Royce Canyon, and identify areas, particularly in the northeastern corner of the park and along the southeastern border, where rare plants are relatively poorly represented in the landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • San Bruno Mountain Habitat Conservation Plan
    SAN BRUNO MOUNTAIN HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN Year 2006 Activities Report For Endangered Species Permit PRT-2-9818 Submitted to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service by the County of San Mateo February 2007 San Bruno Mountain Habitat Conservation Plan -- 2006 Activities Report TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY .................................................................................................................................................... iii SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 4 II. STATUS OF SPECIES OF CONCERN ................................................................................. 4 A. Mission Blue Butterfly (Icaricia icarioides missionensis) ................................................ 5 B. Callippe Silverspot Butterfly (Speyeria callippe callippe) ................................................ 5 C. San Bruno Elfin (Callophrys mossii bayensis) ................................................................ 10 D. Butterfly Monitoring Recommendations for 2006 .......................................................... 13 E. Bay Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas editha bayensis ............................................... 13 F. San Francisco Garter Snake (Thamnophis sirtalis tetrataenia) ....................................... 14 G. California Red-legged
    [Show full text]