Tower Hamlets Borough Council
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE FUTURE ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR TOWER HAMLETS Report to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions September 1999 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND This report sets out the Commission’s final recommendations on the electoral arrangements for Tower Hamlets. Members of the Commission are: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Professor Michael Clarke (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Kru Desai Pamela Gordon Robin Gray Robert Hughes CBE Barbara Stephens (Chief Executive) ©Crown Copyright 1999 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, ©Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. ii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page LETTER TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE v SUMMARY vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 3 3 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 7 4 RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION 9 5 ANALYSIS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 11 6 NEXT STEPS 27 APPENDICES A Final Recommendations for Tower Hamlets: Detailed Mapping 29 B Draft Recommendations for Tower Hamlets (March 1999) 35 A large map illustrating the proposed ward boundaries for Tower Hamlets is inserted inside the back cover of the report LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND iii iv LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Local Government Commission for England 7 September 1999 Dear Secretary of State On 22 September 1998 the Commission began a periodic electoral review of Tower Hamlets under the Local Government Act 1992. We published our draft recommendations in March 1999 and undertook an eight- week period of consultation. We have now prepared our final recommendations in the light of the consultation. We have substantially confirmed our draft recommendations, although some modifications have been made (see paragraphs 120- 121) in the light of further evidence. This report sets out our final recommendations for changes to electoral arrangements in Tower Hamlets. We recommend that Tower Hamlets Borough Council should be served by 51 councillors representing 17 wards, and that changes should be made to ward boundaries in order to improve electoral equality, having regard to the statutory criteria. We note that you have now set out in the White Paper Modern Local Government – In Touch with the People (Cm 4014, HMSO), legislative proposals for a number of changes to local authority electoral arrangements. However, until such time as that new legislation is in place we are obliged to conduct our work in accordance with current legislation, and to continue our current approach to periodic electoral reviews. I would like to thank members and officers of the Borough Council and other local people who have contributed to the review. Their co-operation and assistance have been very much appreciated by Commissioners and staff. Yours sincerely PROFESSOR MALCOLM GRANT Chairman LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND v vi LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND SUMMARY The Commission began a review of Tower Hamlets ● This level of electoral equality is forecast to on 22 September 1998. We published our draft improve further, with the number of electors recommendations for electoral arrangements on 23 per councillor in all wards expected to vary March 1999, after which we undertook an eight- by no more than 8 per cent from the average week period of consultation. for the borough in 2003. ● This report summarises the representations we received during consultation on our draft All further correspondence on these recommendations, and offers our final recommendations and the matters discussed recommendations to the Secretary of State. in this report should be addressed to the Secretary of State for the Environment, We found that the existing electoral arrangements Transport and the Regions, who will not make provide unequal representation of electors in Tower an order implementing the Commission’s Hamlets: recommendations before 19 October 1999: ● in 12 of the 19 wards the number of electors The Secretary of State represented by each councillor varies by Department of the Environment, more than 10 per cent from the average for Transport and the Regions the borough and in three wards by more Local Government Sponsorship Division than 20 per cent; Eland House Bressenden Place ● by 2003 electoral equality shows no overall London SW1E 5DU improvement, with the number of electors per councillor forecast to vary by more than 10 per cent from the average in 12 wards, and by more than 20 per cent in six wards. Our main final recommendations for future electoral arrangements (Figures 1 and 2 and paragraphs 120-121) are that: ● Tower Hamlets Borough Council should be served by 51 councillors, compared to 50 at present; ● there should be 17 wards, two fewer than at present, which would involve changes to the boundaries of all of the existing wards. These recommendations seek to ensure that the number of electors represented by each borough councillor is as nearly as possible the same, having regard to local circumstances. ● In 14 of the 17 wards the number of electors per councillor would vary by no more than 10 per cent from the borough average; LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND vii Figure 1: The Commission’s Final Recommendations: Summary Ward name Number of Constituent areas (existing wards) councillors 1 Bethnal Green 3 St James’ ward (part); St Peter’s ward (part) North 2 Bethnal Green 3 Holy Trinity ward (part); Spitalfields ward (part); South St Peter’s ward (part) 3 Blackwall & 3 Blackwall ward (part); Millwall ward (part) Cubitt Town 4 Bow East 3 Bow ward (part); Park ward (part) 5 Bow West 3 Grove ward; Bow ward (part); Park ward (part) 6 Bromley-by-Bow 3 Bromley ward (part); Lansbury ward (part) 7 East India & 3 East India ward; Lansbury ward (part) Lansbury 8 Limehouse 3 Blackwall ward (part); Lansbury ward (part); Limehouse ward (part); Shadwell ward (part) 9 Mile End East 3 Bromley ward (part); Limehouse ward (part) 10 Mile End & 3 Holy Trinity ward (part); St Dunstan’s ward (part); Globe Town St James’ ward (part) 11 Millwall 3 Blackwall ward (part); Millwall ward (part); Shadwell ward (part) 12 St Dunstan’s & 3 Redcoat ward (part); St Dunstan’s ward (part) Stepney Green 13 St Katharine’s & 3 St Katharine’s ward (part); Shadwell ward (part) Wapping 14 Shadwell 3 Shadwell ward (part); St Katharine’s ward (part) 15 Spitalfields & 3 Spitalfields ward (part) Banglatown 16 Weavers 3 Weavers ward; St Peter’s ward (part) 17 Whitechapel 3 St Mary’s ward; Redcoat ward (part); St Katharine’s ward (part) Note: Map 2, the maps in Appendix A and the large map in the back of the report illustrate the proposed wards outlined above. viii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Figure 2: The Commission’s Final Recommendations for Tower Hamlets Ward name Number Electorate Number Variance Electorate Number Variance of (1998) of electors from (2003) of electors from councillors per councillor average per councillor average %% 1 Bethnal Green 3 7,864 2,621 8 7,100 2,367 -8 North 2 Bethnal Green 3 7,793 2,598 7 7,928 2,643 3 South 3 Blackwall & 3 6,705 2,235 -8 8,070 2,690 5 Cubitt Town 4 Bow East 3 7,164 2,388 -2 7,743 2,581 1 5 Bow West 3 7,595 2,521 4 8,249 2,750 7 6 Bromley-by-Bow 3 7,112 2,371 -2 7,963 2,654 4 7 East India & 3 7,406 2,469 2 7,574 2,525 -1 Lansbury 8 Limehouse 3 7,699 2,566 6 8,074 2,691 5 9 Mile End East 3 6,620 2,207 -9 7,346 2,449 -4 10 Mile End & 3 8,059 2,686 11 7,673 2,558 0 Globe Town 11 Millwall 3 6,714 2,238 -8 7,617 2,539 -1 12 St Dunstan’s & 3 8,476 2,825 16 7,697 2,566 0 Stepney Green 13 St Katharine’s 3 7,577 2,526 4 7,316 2,439 -5 & Wapping 14 Shadwell 3 7,047 2,349 -3 7,754 2,585 1 15 Spitalfields & 3 5,416 1,805 -26 7,392 2,464 -4 Banglatown 16 Weavers 3 7,305 2,435 0 7,540 2,513 -2 17 Whitechapel 3 7,294 2,431 0 7,631 2,544 -1 Totals 51 123,847 --130,669 -- Averages --2,428 --2,562 - Source: Electorate figures are based on Tower Hamlets Borough Council’s submissions. Note: The ‘variance from average’ column shows by how far, in percentage terms, the number of electors per councillor varies from the average for the borough. The minus symbol (-) denotes a lower than average number of electors. Figures have been rounded to the nearest whole number. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ix x LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND 1. INTRODUCTION 1 This report contains our final recommendations usually to be between 40 and 80. We start from the on the electoral arrangements for the London general assumption that the existing council size borough of Tower Hamlets. already secures effective and convenient local government in that borough but we are willing to 2 In broad terms, the objective of this periodic look carefully at arguments why this might not be electoral review (PER) of Tower Hamlets is to so. However, we have found it necessary to ensure that the number of electors represented by safeguard against an upward drift in the number of each councillor on the Borough Council is as nearly councillors, and we believe that any proposal for an as possible the same, taking into account local increase in council size will need to be fully circumstances.