DOCSLIB.ORG

A1: Šestanovac

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A1: Šestanovac HAC brosura 7 str. HAC brosura 8 str. HAC brosura 1 str. HAC brosura 2 str. SUDIONICI U REALIZACIJI PROJEKTA IZGRADNJE DIONICA OD ŠESTANOVCA DO RAVČE Spojna cesta: čvor Ploče - Luka Ploče // Dionica > ČCP Karamatići - Luka Ploče I SPOJNE CESTE ČCP KARAMATIĆI - ČVOR ČEVELJUŠA PLOČE VLADA REPUBLIKE HRVATSKE > > > > > > OBJEKTI MINISTARSTVO MORA, PROMETA I INFRASTRUKTURE < SPLIT < ZAGREB DUBROVNIK > Vijadukt Radonjić, projektiran kao dvojna građevina ima INVESTITOR: Tunel Mali Prolog L = 1005 m lijevu stranu duljine 288 m, dok je vijadukt na desnoj strani Hrvatske autoceste d.o.o., Zagreb duljine 310 m. Ima dva vozna traka za svaki smjer vožnje, 6.478 m dopuštena brzina vožnje iznosi 80 km/h. Tunel Kobiljača L = 769 m STUDIJE, PROJEKTI, REVIZIJA: Inženjerski projektni zavod d.d., Zagreb Vijadukt Brečići - Struge L = 462 m Vijadukt Dračevac 1, duljine 329 m, ima dva vozna traka, po Institut građevnarstva Hrvatske d.d. Zagreb 40 km jedan za svaki smjer vožnje, dopuštena brzina vožnje iznosi >>>>>>>>> Tunel Puljani L = 320 m Institut građevinarstva Hrvatske d.d., Poslovni centar Split 80 km/h. Institut građevinarstva Hrvatske d.d., Poslovni centar Rijeka Vijadukt Kula L = 462 m Zavod za fotogrametriju d.d. Zagreb Vijadukt Dračevac 2, duljine 196 m, ima dva vozna traka, po A10 Geodetski zavod d.d. Split ČCP Karamatići jedan za svaki smjer vožnje, dopuštena brzina vožnje iznosi Dalekovod d.d. Zagreb AUTOCESTA A1 ZAGREB - SPLIT - DUBROVNIK 80 km/h. AUTOCESTA GRANICA BIH - PLOČE Telegra d.o.o. Sveta Nedelja Tunel Zmijarevići L = 300 m TEB inženjering d.d. Zagreb Vijadukt Vrila, duljine 253 m, ima dva vozna traka, po jedan ZG projekt d.o.o. Zagreb Dionice > Šestanovac - Zagvozd - Ravča Spojna cesta ČVOR PLOČE - LUKA PLOČE za svaki smjer vožnje, dopuštena brzina vožnje iznosi 80 Građevinski fakultet Zagreb Odmorište Ploče PUO PLOČE 7.540 m km/h. Dionica > ČCP Karamatići- Čvor Čeveljuša Građevinski fakultet Osijek Vijadukt Radonjić L = 299 m Građevinski fakultet Split Vijadukt Dračevac 1 L = 329 m Most Crna Rijeka, duljine 328 m, ima tri vozna traka, srednji Brodarski institut d.o.o. Zagreb AUTOCESTA A10 GRANICA BIH - PLOČE Vijadukt Dračevac 2 L = 196 m u planu Vijadukt Vrila L = 253 m RGN fakultet Zagreb trak je za ulaz u luku Ploče, lijevi trak spaja luku sa Spojnom cestom od čvora Ploče na autocesti do Luke Ploče Dimenzioniranje elemenata, horizontalne, vertikalne i spojnom cestom, dok je desni predviđen kao veza spojne Geoexpert d.o.o. Zagreb Tunel Petrovac L = 497 m omogućit će se veza luke Ploče s autocestom A1 Zagreb – Split – poprečne geometrije spojne ceste izvršeno je za računsku Spojna cesta: čvor Ploče - Luka Ploče IPZ-ingprojekt d.o.o. Zagreb ceste i državne ceste D8, dopuštena brzina vožnje iznosi 80 Dubrovnik. brzinu vr = 80 km/h. IPZ-spelprojekt d.o.o. Zagreb km/h. Obzirom na trendove razvoja gospodarstva, cilj luke Ploče je Dionica > ČCP Karamatići - Čvor Čeveljuša Tunel Međak L = 341 m povećanje kapaciteta, učinkovitosti i kvalitetne usluge, iz čega 1.285 m ARHEOLOŠKA ISTRAŽIVANJA: ČEVELJUŠA Tunel Zmijarevići je dvocijevan tunel, lijeva cijev je duga 200 proizlazi i važnost izgradnje kvalitetne cestovne mreže. Geometrija poprečnog presjeka za četverotračnu prometnicu: MINISTARSTVO KULTURE REPUBLIKE HRVATSKE m, desna je duljine 400 m i ima dva vozna traka. Sjeverni Izgradnja trase spojne ceste provodi se u dvije faze: Luka Ploče portal tunela nalazi se na nadmorskoj visini od 136.55 razdvojeni kolnici sa po dva vozna traka IZVOĐAČI RADOVA: (131.77) m.n.m., a južni na 144.218 (146.92) m.n.m. I. faza: čeoni cestarinski prolaz Karamatići – Čvor Čeveljuša Viadukt d.d. Zagreb Dopuštena brzina vožnje iznosi 80 km/h. II. faza: čvor Ploče na autocesti A1 - Luka Ploče. širina voznog traka 3.50 m Konstruktor Inženjering d.d. Split Hidroelektra d.d. Zagreb U prvoj fazi pušta se u promet 9,7 km spojne ceste čvor Ploče - širina rubnog traka 0.50 m Tunel Petrovac je jednocijevan tunel, duljine 497 m, ima dva Luka Ploče koja obuhvaća: Cesta Varaždin d.d. Varaždin > > > > > > vozna traka i namijenjen je za dvosmjerni promet. Istočni Zagorje tehnobeton d.d. Varaždin širina razdjeljnog traka 3.00 m portal tunela nalazi se na nadmorskoj visini od 75.51 - spojnu cestu od ČCP Karamatići do Čvora Čeveljuša Strabag d.o.o. Zagreb m.n.m., a zapadni na 67.37 m.n.m. Dopuštena brzina vožnje Osijek-Koteks d.d. Osijek - privremeni spoj na paralelni poljski put širina bankine i berme 1.50 m iznosi 80 km/h. Ingra d.d. Zagreb Na dionici spojne ceste izgrađeno je 10 objekata: 1 most, - rekonstrukciju državne ceste D513. 6 vijadukata, Dalekovod d.d. Zagreb ukupna širina prometnice u kruni 22.00 m 3 tunela. Tunel Međak je jednocijevan trotračni tunel, duljine 341 m i Karakteristika ove dionice je razdvajanje trase na četverotračnu, namijenjen je za dvosmjerni promet. Sjeverni portal tunela odnosno dvotračnu cestu zbog predviđenog odvojka za Dubrovnik s Ugovorena vrijednost radova građenja i opremanja dionica iznosi nalazi se na nadmorskoj visini od 24.85 m.n.m., a južni na NADZORNI ODBOR HRVATSKIH AUTOCESTA: vezom na državnu cestu D8 (denivelirani rotor Rogotin) ispred 882.982.850, 83 kune bez PDV-a. 16.30 m.n.m. Dozvoljena brzina vožnje iznosi 80 km/h. Geometrija poprečnog presjeka za dvotračnu prometnicu: Zdravko Livaković, predsjednik Nadzornog odbora postojećeg mosta preko rijeke Neretve, odnosno nastavka spojne ceste za luku Ploče s vezom na D8 na lokaciji Čeveljuša (čvor Boris Ordulj, zamjenik predsjednika Nadzornog odbora kolnik sa dva vozna traka za dvosmjerni promet Čeveljuša). Nikola Blagaić, član Nadzornog odbora Franjo Lucić, član Nadzornog odbora širina voznog traka 3.50 m Projektirana dionica pruža se u smjeru sjever – jug (jugozapad). Josip Mostovac, član Nadzornog odbora > > > > ČVOR Obzirom na karakteristike trase i prostorne uvjete koridora kojim širina rubnog traka 0.50 m prolazi, trasa je podijeljena na tri cjeline: UPRAVA HRVATSKIH AUTOCESTA: Jurica Prskalo, predsjednik Uprave ČEVELJUŠA širina bankine i berme 1.50 m - od km 1+200.000 do km cca 4+200 – četverotračna prometnica Marijo Lovrinčević, član Uprave - od km cca 4+200 do km 9+725 – dvotračna prometnica Ivica Mlinarević, član Uprave ukupna širina prometnice u kruni 11.00 m Josip Sapunar, član Uprave - Čvor “Čeveljuša”. Čvor “Čeveljuša”, zajedno s rekon- strukcijom državne ceste D8, zbog Nakladnik: Hrvatske autoceste d.o.o. svoje je važnosti izdvojen kao Za nakladnika: Jurica Prskalo, Marijo Lovrinčević, posebna cjelina. Ivica Mlinarević, Josip Sapunar Autori: Miodrag Furdin, Nina Mulc Mihalić, Antun Željko Bodor, Ivana Miklošić, Danijel Pintar Čvor prometno povezuje luku Uredila: Darija Petrović sa spojnom cestom, a ujedno Fotografije autoceste: Damil Kalogjera omogućava pristup s državne ceste Grafičko oblikovanje luci kao i autocestama A10 i A1. i priprema za tisak: Fimi media Tisak: Bauer grupa Naklada: 150 kom HAC brosura 3 str. HAC brosura 4 str. HAC brosura 5 str. HAC brosura 6 str. DIONICE // ŠESTANOVAC - ZAGVOZD - RAVČA A1 AUTOCESTA ZAGREB - SPLIT - DUBROVNIK > > SEKTOR : DUGOPOLJE - PLOČE // DIONICE: ŠESTANOVAC - ZAGVOZD - RAVČA 10, 426 m 29, 471 m ČVOR A10 AUTOCESTA GRANICA BIH - PLOČE > > > > > > > > > Spojna cesta ČVOR PLOČE - LUKA PLOČE DIONICA: ČCP KARAMATIĆI - ČVOR ČEVELJUŠA > > > > > > > > > OBJEKTI U TRASI AUTOCESTE < ZAGREB D1 Objekti u trasi izvedeni su u punom Vijadukt Mladine L = 158 m Vijadukt Gradina L = 158 m Vijadukt Gradina L = 249 m Vijadukt Glavica L = 309 m Vijadukt Staje L = 238 m Vijadukt Rašćane L = 633 m Vijadukt Dubrava L = 271 m D511 ŠESTANOVAC PUO ZAGVOZD ZAGVOZD PUO RAŠĆANE GORNJE PUO BIOKOVO RAVČA profilu autoceste, a najznačajniji objekti D220 su: Trilj A1 D62 Vijadukt Mladine, duljine 158 m, ima dva Centar za održavanje vozna i jedan zaustavni trak za svaki D58 DUGOPOLJE < ZAGREB i kontrolu prometa DUBROVNIK > smjer vožnje, dopuštena brzina vožnje Kaštel Kaštel A1 Kaštel Stari Lukšić D60 ČVOR ŠESTANOVAC iznosi 130 km/h. Kambelovac Klis AUTOCESTA ZAGREB - SPLIT - DUBROVNIK Kaštel Novi Kaštel Sućurac Odmorište Zagvozd Odmorište Rašćane Gornje Odmorište Biokovo Solin Bisko Cista Velika Vijadukt Gradina, duljine 158 m, ima dva A1 D39 ODMORIŠTE ZAGVOZD vozna i jedan zaustavni trak za svaki Kaštel Kaštel Seget Donji D8 Gomolica u planu smjer vožnje, dopuštena brzina vožnje Dionice > ŠESTANOVAC - ZAGVOZD i ZAGVOZD - RAVČA Štafilić Žrnovnica Trogir VIJADUKT MLADINE u planu u planu iznosi 130 km/h. 10. 426 Prijelaz za životinje, duljine 156 m, i Lovreč VIJADUKT GRADINA Stobreč > > > ČVORIŠTA nadsvođuje puni profil autoceste. Autocesta Zagreb – Split – Dubrovnik dio je mreže Elementi poprečnog profila: međunarodnih E cesta, te osim domaće oznake A1, dobiva i SPLIT Podstrana ČVOR ZAGVOZD kombinirane oznake E-65 i E-71, jer nastavlja prometne tokove D62 D60 Povezivanje dionica autoceste od Šestanovca do Ravče na postojeću Vijadukt RAŠĆANE, jedan od najvažnijih objekata na dionici Zagvozd razdjelni pojas 3,00 m Sjeverne i Srednje Europe iz smjera Beča (E-59), Bratislave D8 Imotski cestovnu mrežu ostvaruje se preko čvorišta Zagvozd 1, Zagvozd 2 i - Ravča je vijadukt "Rašćane", gredni most sandučastog poprečnog (E-65) i Budimpešte (E-71). Blato na Cetini VIJADUKT GRADINA Ravča. Čvor Zagvozd 1 i Ravča na autocesti su projektirani u obliku presjeka, ukupne duljine 633 m s 19 raspona, a njegova ukupna vozni trak 3,75 m trube, a čvor Zagvozd 2 na državnoj cesti u obliku poludjeteline. širina iznosi gotovo 28 metara. Sastoji se od dva paralelna mosta od Dugi Rat Donji Vinjani Tlocrtni elementi krakova čvora Zagvozd 1 i Ravča projektirani su za kojih svaki nosi jedan prometni trak s dva vozna i jednim zaustavnim Autocesta Zagreb – Split – Dubrovnik osnovna je infrastruk- VIJADUKT GLAVICA preticajni trak 3,75 m računsku brzinu od 40 do 60 km/h, a tlocrtni elementi krakova čvora trakom, a građen je tehnologijom postupnog potiskivanja, koja turna poveznica sjevernog i južnog teritorija Republike Omiš Šestanovac Zmijavci km Zagvozd 2 za Vr = 40 km/h. osigurava visoku kvalitetu konstrukcije i tek malo zadiranje u Hrvatske, dakle, od nacionalnog je interesa, strateška ŠOLTA zaustavni trak 2,50 m VIJADUKT STAJE prirodni okoliš.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dalmatia Tourist Guide
    Vuk Tvrtko Opa~i}: County of Split and Dalmatia . 4 Tourist Review: Publisher: GRAPHIS d.o.o. Maksimirska 88, Zagreb Tel./faks: (385 1) 2322-975 E-mail: [email protected] Editor-in-Chief: Elizabeta [unde Ivo Babi}: Editorial Committee: Zvonko Ben~i}, Smiljana [unde, Split in Emperor Diocletian's Palace . 6 Marilka Krajnovi}, Silvana Jaku{, fra Gabriel Juri{i}, Ton~i ^ori} Editorial Council: Mili Razovi}, Bo`o Sin~i}, Ivica Kova~evi}, Stjepanka Mar~i}, Ivo Babi}: Davor Glavina The historical heart of Trogir and its Art Director: Elizabeta [unde cathedral . 9 Photography Editor: Goran Morovi} Logo Design: @eljko Kozari} Layout and Proofing: GRAPHIS Language Editor: Marilka Krajnovi} Printed in: Croatian, English, Czech, and Gvido Piasevoli: German Pearls of central Dalmatia . 12 Translators: German – Irena Bad`ek-Zub~i} English – Katarina Bijeli}-Beti Czech – Alen Novosad Tourist Map: Ton~i ^ori} Printed by: Tiskara Mei}, Zagreb Cover page: Hvar Port, by Ivo Pervan Ivna Bu}an: Biblical Garden of Stomorija . 15 Published: annually This Review is sponsored by the Tourist Board of the County of Split and Dalmatia For the Tourist Board: Mili Razovi}, Director Prilaz bra}e Kaliterna 10, 21000 Split Gvido Piasevoli: Tel./faks: (385 21) 490-032, 490-033, 490-036 One flew over the tourists' nest . 18 Web: www.dalmacija.net E-mail: [email protected] We would like to thank to all our associates, tourist boards, hotels, and tourist agencies for cooperation. @eljko Kuluz: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or repro- Fishing and fish stories .
    [Show full text]
  • FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999
    FEEFHS Quarterly A Journal of Central & Bast European Genealogical Studies FEEFHS Quarterly Volume 7, nos. 1-2 FEEFHS Quarterly Who, What and Why is FEEFHS? Tue Federation of East European Family History Societies Editor: Thomas K. Ecllund. [email protected] (FEEFHS) was founded in June 1992 by a small dedicated group Managing Editor: Joseph B. Everett. [email protected] of American and Canadian genealogists with diverse ethnic, reli- Contributing Editors: Shon Edwards gious, and national backgrounds. By the end of that year, eleven Daniel Schlyter societies bad accepted its concept as founding members. Each year Emily Schulz since then FEEFHS has doubled in size. FEEFHS nows represents nearly two hundred organizations as members from twenty-four FEEFHS Executive Council: states, five Canadian provinces, and fourteen countries. lt contin- 1998-1999 FEEFHS officers: ues to grow. President: John D. Movius, c/o FEEFHS (address listed below). About half of these are genealogy societies, others are multi-pur- [email protected] pose societies, surname associations, book or periodical publish- 1st Vice-president: Duncan Gardiner, C.G., 12961 Lake Ave., ers, archives, libraries, family history centers, on-line services, in- Lakewood, OH 44107-1533. [email protected] stitutions, e-mail genealogy list-servers, heraldry societies, and 2nd Vice-president: Laura Hanowski, c/o Saskatchewan Genealogi- other ethnic, religious, and national groups. FEEFHS includes or- cal Society, P.0. Box 1894, Regina, SK, Canada S4P 3EI ganizations representing all East or Central European groups that [email protected] have existing genealogy societies in North America and a growing 3rd Vice-president: Blanche Krbechek, 2041 Orkla Drive, group of worldwide organizations and individual members, from Minneapolis, MN 55427-3429.
    [Show full text]
  • Split & Central Dalmatia
    © Lonely Planet Publications 216 Split & Central Dalmatia Central Dalmatia is the most action-packed, sight-rich and diverse part of Croatia, with dozens of castles, fascinating islands, spectacular beaches, dramatic mountains, quiet ports and an emerg- ing culinary scene, not to mention Split’s Diocletian Palace and medieval Trogir (both Unesco World Heritage sites). In short, this part of Croatia will grip even the most picky visitor. The region stretches from Trogir in the northwest to Ploče in the southeast. Split is its largest city and a hub for bus and boat connections along the Adriatic coast. The rugged DALMATIA DALMATIA 1500m-high Dinaric Range provides the dramatic background to the region. SPLIT & CENTRAL SPLIT & CENTRAL Diocletian’s Palace is a sight like no other (a Roman ruin and the living soul of Split) and it would be a cardinal Dalmatian sin to miss out on the sights, bars, restaurants and general buzz inside it. The Roman ruins in Solin are altogether a more quiet, pensive affair, while Trogir is a tranquil city that’s preserved its fantastic medieval sculpture and architecture. Then there is Hvar Town, the region’s most popular destination, richly ornamented with Renais- sance architecture, good food, a fun atmosphere and tourists – who are in turn ornamented with deep tans, big jewels and shiny yachts. Let’s not forget the coastline: you can choose from the slender and seductive Zlatni Rat on Brač, wonderful beaches in Brela on the Makarska Riviera, secluded coves on Brač, Šolta and Vis, or gorgeous (and nudie) beaches on the Pakleni Islands off Hvar.
    [Show full text]
  • LOKALNI IZBORI - Drugi Krug Glasovanja 30.5.2021
    LOKALNI IZBORI - drugi krug glasovanja 30.5.2021. BROJ BIRAČA U POPISU BIRAČA NAKON ZATVARANJA REGISTRA BIRAČA ŽUPAN, GRADONAČELNIK/OPĆINSKI NAČELNIK, GRADONAČELNIK GRADA ZAGREBA DATUM: 21.05.2021. broj birača 1 ZAGREBAČKA ŽUPANIJA BEDENICA 1.092 BISTRA 5.677 BRCKOVLJANI 5.878 BRDOVEC 10.022 DUBRAVA 3.751 DUBRAVICA 1.128 DUGO SELO 16.791 FARKAŠEVAC 1.370 GRADEC 2.923 IVANIĆ-GRAD 12.257 JAKOVLJE 3.203 JASTREBARSKO 13.719 KLINČA SELA 4.507 KLOŠTAR IVANIĆ 5.310 KRAŠIĆ 2.083 KRAVARSKO 1.660 KRIŽ 5.709 LUKA 1.149 MARIJA GORICA 1.903 ORLE 1.619 PISAROVINA 3.045 POKUPSKO 1.790 PRESEKA 1.030 PUŠĆA 2.229 RAKOVEC 974 RUGVICA 7.131 SAMOBOR 33.210 STUPNIK 3.309 SVETA NEDELJA 16.189 SVETI IVAN ZELINA 13.643 VELIKA GORICA 55.543 VRBOVEC 12.060 ZAPREŠIĆ 22.080 ŽUMBERAK 753 Ukupno 274.737 broj birača 2 KRAPINSKO-ZAGORSKA ŽUPANIJA BEDEKOVČINA 6.519 GORNJA STUBICA 4.319 HUM NA SUTLI 4.030 KLANJEC 2.385 KONJŠČINA 2.985 KRALJEVEC NA SUTLI 1.367 KRAPINSKE TOPLICE 4.538 OROSLAVJE 5.291 PETROVSKO 2.039 STUBIČKE TOPLICE 2.552 ZABOK 7.630 ZLATAR BISTRICA 2.087 Ukupno 45.742 broj birača 3 SISAČKO-MOSLAVAČKA ŽUPANIJA DONJI KUKURUZARI 1.242 DVOR 3.906 GLINA 6.889 GVOZD 2.611 HRVATSKA DUBICA 1.584 HRVATSKA KOSTAJNICA 2.128 JASENOVAC 1.567 KUTINA 18.730 LEKENIK 4.972 LIPOVLJANI 2.654 MAJUR 925 MARTINSKA VES 2.596 NOVSKA 10.827 PETRINJA 20.750 POPOVAČA 9.775 SISAK 38.671 SUNJA 4.678 TOPUSKO 2.482 VELIKA LUDINA 2.084 Ukupno 139.071 broj birača 4 KARLOVAČKA ŽUPANIJA BARILOVIĆ 2.603 BOSILJEVO 1.039 CETINGRAD 1.832 DRAGANIĆ 2.346 DUGA RESA 9.234 GENERALSKI STOL 2.147 JOSIPDOL
    [Show full text]
  • Budget Transparency in Croatian Counties, Cities and Municipalities: November 2019 – April 20201
    NEWSLETTER Zagreb l Smičiklasova 21 doi: 10.3326/nle.2020.119 [email protected] l www.ijf.hr l tel: +385(1) 4886 444 No. 119 l July 2020 l ISSN 1848-4662 Budget transparency in Croatian counties, cities and municipalities: November 2019 – April 20201 KATARINA OTT, MIHAELA BRONIĆ, MIROSLAV PETRUŠIĆ, BRANKO STANIĆ SIMONA PRIJAKOVIĆ The overall average level of budget transparency in Croatian local government units2, expressed as the number of budget documents published on their respective official websites, stands at 4.1 (out of a maximum 5). The average value for counties stands at 4.9, for cities 4.5 and 4 for municipalities. Even though the average results keep improving year after year, around 20% of the local government units still fail to publish all three legally required documents, while 41% do not follow the recommendation of the Ministry of Finance for publishing two additional documents. Although the publishing of documents does not, in itself, guarantee absolute transparency, it is considered the initial step toward higher transparency levels necessary for citizens’ participation in the budgetary process and control over the collection and spending of public funds. In these exceptional times of crisis brought about by the coronavirus (plus the earthquake in the case of Zagreb and its surroundings), when revenues are lower and expenditures higher, such control is necessary even more. Exceptional circumstances should not act as an excuse for non-transparent activities that could affect, in both the short and the long term, efficiency and justness, the economic, social and political circumstances as well as the well-being of citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030)
    Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) Republic of Croatia MINISTRY OF THE SEA, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 - 2030) 2nd Draft April 2017 The project is co-financed by the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund. Republic of Croatia Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure I Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background on development of a Croatian Comprehensive National Transport Plan .................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Transport Development Strategy (TDS 2016) ............................. 4 1.3 Revision of the TDS (2016) Ex-Ante conditionality .................................................. 4 1.4 Methodology for the development of the TDS (2016) ............................................ 5 2 Analysis .................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 General aspects of transport ................................................................................... 7 2.2 Public transport and zero-emission modes ........................................................... 34 2.3 Rail Transport......................................................................................................... 72 2.4 Road transport
    [Show full text]
  • Route Evaluation Report Croatia Eurovelo 8 – Mediterranean Route
    Route Evaluation Report Croatia EuroVelo 8 – Mediterranean Route MEDCYCLETOUR Project Davorin Belamarić April 27th 2018 Contents 1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Mission of the project and report objectives ................................................................. 5 1.2 Organization ................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Brief methodological explanations ................................................................................ 8 1.3.1 Different phases of the route evaluation ................................................................ 8 1.3.2 ECS – European Certification Standard used for this evaluation ........................... 9 1.3.3 Used tools and equipment, photographs ..............................................................10 1.4 Overview of the sections .............................................................................................10 2 Infrastructure ......................................................................................................................16 2.1 Existing route infrastructure ........................................................................................16 2.1.1 Public transport ....................................................................................................19 2.2 Critical deficiencies .....................................................................................................30
    [Show full text]
  • Strategija Razvoja Općine Dugi Rat Do 2020
    STRATEGIJA RAZVOJA OPĆINE DUGI RAT DO 2020. GODINE SADRŽAJ 2.4.3. Obrazovanje 14 ISKAZNICA RAZVOJNOG PROJEKTA 3 2.5. Gospodarstvo Općine 16 UVODNA RIJEČ NAČELNIKA OPĆINE 4 2.5.1. Malo i srednje poduzetništvo 16 1. UVOD 5 2.5.2. Poljoprivreda 17 2. ANALIZA TRENUTNOG STANJA NA PODRUČJU 2.6. Turizam Općine Dugi Rat 18 OPĆINE DUGI RAT 6 2.6.1. Stanje turizma Općine 18 2.1. Geoprostorna obilježja Općine 6 2.6.2. Turističke manifestacije 21 2.2. Komunalna i prometna infrastruktura 8 2.7. Lokalna samouprava 21 2.2.1. Prometna infrastruktura 8 2.7.1. Proračun Općine 21 2.2.1.1. Cestovni promet 8 2.7.2. Socijalno osjetljive skupine i socijalna politika 23 2.2.1.2. Pomorski promet 8 2.7.3. Udruge civilnog društva 24 2.2.2. Elektroopskrba 9 2.7.4. Zaštita i spašavanje 26 2.2.3. Vodoopskrba 9 3. SWOT ANALIZA OPĆINE 26 2.2.4. Odvodnja 10 4. VIZIJA I STRATEŠKI CILJEVI 28 2.2.5. Bežični Internet (HotSpot) 10 5. PRIORITETI I MJERE 30 2.3. Povijesna i kulturna dobra 11 6. USKLAĐENOST SA STRATEŠKIM 2.4. Stanovništvo Općine 12 DOKUMENTIMA VIŠE RAZINE 42 2.4.1. Demografska situacija 12 6.1. USKLAĐENOST S EUROPSKIM STRATEŠKIM 2.4.2. Tržište rada 14 DOKUMENTIMA 42 6.2. USKLAĐENOST S NACIONALNIM STRATEŠKIM DOKUMENTIMA 45 6.3. USKLAĐENOST SA ŽUPANIJSKIM STRATEŠKIM DOKUMENTIMA 47 7. PROVEDBA STRATEGIJE RAZVOJA 47 2 ISKAZNICA RAZVOJNOG PROJEKTA Naručitelj strategije razvoja: 10. Slavica Demikeli, JUO Općina Dugi Rat Općina Dugi Rat, načelnik Jerko Roglić 11.
    [Show full text]
  • STREAMS of INCOME and JOBS: the Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins
    STREAMS OF INCOME AND JOBS: The Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Highlights – The Value of Water for Electricity 5 Highlights – The Value of Water for Agriculture 8 Highlights – The Value of Public Water Supplie 11 Highlights – The Value of Water for Tourism 12 Conclusion: 13 BACKGROUND OF THE BASINS 15 METHODOLOGY 19 LAND USE 21 GENERAL CONTEXT 23 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR ELECTRICITY 29 Background of the Trebišnjica and Neretva hydropower systems 30 Croatia 33 Republika Srpska 35 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 37 Montenegro 40 Case study – Calculating electricity or revenue sharing in the Trebišnjica basin 41 Gap Analysis – Water for Electricity 43 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR AGRICULTURE 45 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 46 Croatia 51 Case study – Water for Tangerines 55 Case study – Wine in Dubrovnik-Neretva County 56 Case study – Wine in Eastern Herzegovina 57 Republika Srpska 57 Gap Analysis – Water for Agriculture 59 Montenegro 59 THE VALUE OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES 63 Republika Srpska 64 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 66 Montenegro 68 Croatia 69 Gap Analysis – Public Water 70 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR TOURISM 71 Croatia 72 CONCLUSION 75 REFERENCES 77 1st edition Author/data analysis: Hilary Drew With contributions from: Zoran Mateljak Data collection, research, and/or translation support: Dr. Nusret Dresković, Nebojša Jerković, Zdravko Mrkonja, Dragutin Sekulović, Petra Remeta, Zoran Šeremet, and Veronika Vlasić Design: Ivan Cigić Published by WWF Adria Supported by the
    [Show full text]
  • Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB)
    E1468 Consulting Services for Environment Impact Assessment Public Disclosure Authorized in the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB) No. TF052845/GE-P084608 Public Disclosure Authorized F I N A L EIA R E P O R T Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Sarajevo/Banja Luka, August 2006 Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia Proposed Integrated Ecosystem Management of the Nerteva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB) Project Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms EXECUTIVE SUMMARY List of Tables List of Pictures List of Annexes References 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .....................................................................................14 1.1. Background .............................................................................................. 14 1.2. Project objectives..................................................................................... 15 1.3. Project components ................................................................................. 16 2. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ......................................21 2.1. Overall Project Implementation Arrangements....................................... 21 2.2. Requirements of the WB .......................................................................... 22 2.3. Bosnia and Herzegovina environmental policy ........................................ 23 2.4. Legislation of Republic of Croatia ............................................................ 26 2.5. Evaluation of project environmental aspects .................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • A1 BAYESIAN RESPONDER META-ANALYSIS of REGIONAL ANESTHESIA to PREVENT CHRONIC PAIN AFTER ILIAC CREST BONE GRAFT HARVESTING Micha
    A1 BAYESIAN RESPONDER META-ANALYSIS OF REGIONAL ANESTHESIA TO PREVENT CHRONIC PAIN AFTER ILIAC CREST BONE GRAFT HARVESTING Michael H. Andreae , M.D.1, Matthew Johnson2, Henry Sacks3 1Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, 2Teachers College, Columbia University, 3Preventive Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA Introduction: Iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) remains the gold standard for autologous bone grafting. IBCG harvesting can lead to persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP), devastating and difficult to treat (Brull 1992). Local anesthetics administration may reduce this risk (Singh 2007). PPSP trials typically report heterogeneous outcomes, making classical frequentist meta-analysis in our Cochrane review in print (Andreae 2012) challenging. To overcome this limitation, we developed a Bayesian model on regional anesthesia for the prevention of persistent pain after IBCG harvesting. We pooled dichotomous and continuous pain outcomes at varying follow up intervals. Methods: Methods were detailed in our systematic review for the Cochrane Collaboration in print (Andreae 2012). Search: Briefly, we searched the Cochrane Central, PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL (1966 to April 2012) without any language restriction using a combination of free text and controlled vocabulary. We searched conference abstracts by hand. Selection: We included randomized and non-randomized controlled clinical trials with pain outcomes at least 12 weeks postoperatively. Included studies compared local or regional anesthesia versus conventional analgesia for chronic pain after ICBG harvest. Data extraction: We assessed trial quality and extracted pain outcome, including information on adverse events. Bayesian model: We developed a longitudinal Bayesian model in OpenBUGS with three time points to estimate the posterior distribution of the odds ratio of chronic pain six months after surgery.
    [Show full text]
  • ENG Base Info
    Dear guest, Our office is situated between pier D and E, and our vessels in pier D. Check in: Saturday from 4 p.m. Check out: Friday till 7 p.m. with overnight stay onboard till Saturday 9 a.m. The time between your arrival and boarding you can spend in restaurant or caffe bar in the marina, at beach near marina, you can go for a trip to the cities of Split or Trogir to do some sightseeing, or you can use this time to buy supplies for your stay. Charter documents: We require Crew list, skipper licence, VHF certificate and approximate time of client’s arrival, to be delivered to our office latest 1 week before charter. If requested documents and information are not provided on time, check in could be delayed. For check in please prepare: boarding pass and/or charter contract, deposit and payment if needed, and if you haven’t send before: crew list or ID/Pass for each crew member and passenger, Skipper and VHF license for all crew members,. Firm details and contacts: Yacht4You d.o.o. Tel: +385 21 222 300 Tax: HR 34264169669 Fax: +385 21 222 503 Franje Tuđmana 213 Mob: +385 91 6534 644 Ciril Vrančič, general manager 21 213 Kaštel Gomilica Mob: +385 91 6543 641 Asja Belančić, office manager Croatia Mob: +385 91 6543 640 Mario Jakić, base manager E-mail: [email protected] How to reach us: By car: If travelling by car the best choice is the highway A1. Exit the highway at Dugopolje, ride in direction of Solin / Trogir.
    [Show full text]