DOCSLIB.ORG

Parents Make the Difference Findings from a Randomized Impact Evaluation of a Parenting Program in Rural Liberia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parents Make the Difference Findings from a Randomized Impact Evaluation of a Parenting Program in Rural Liberia Parents Make the Difference Findings from a randomized impact evaluation of a parenting program in rural Liberia International Rescue Committee | NOVEMBER 2014 Authored by: Amanda Sim, Eve Puffer, Eric Green, Rhea Chase, John Zayzay, Eduardo Garcia-Rolland and Laura Boone. Acknowledgements This project was implemented by the International Rescue Committee (IRC) in Liberia. We extend particular thanks to John Zayzay, Ruth Z.B. Korgbe-Siafa, Rufus J. Kuku, Bobby Nimely, and the entire IRC Liberia team in Lofa County for their tireless efforts. We also thank Sandra Maignant, Geoffrey Shyamba Kirenga, Jody Yasinowsky, Sarah Pepper, David Evans, Aitor Sanchez Lacomba, Vincent Kahi, and Margaret Hanks for their support. Justine Landegger, Julia Frazier, Jeannie Annan, and Sarah Smith provided technical support on project design and imple- mentation, as well as valuable comments on this report. Elsa Friis provided assistance with data collection and management. Finally, we would like to thank the 270 families who participated in the study for their patience and generosity. This project was funded by UBS Optimus Foundation and an anonymous donor. Photography by Mark Darrough. Parents Make the Difference Findings from a randomized impact evaluation of a parenting program in rural Liberia International Rescue Committee | NOVEMBER 2014 Table of Contents 2 Executive Summary 7 Introduction 8 Parents Make the Difference Program Theory of Change 10 Impact Evaluation Research Questions Study Design and Methodology 13 Target Population Demographic characteristics Baseline parenting characteristics Baseline child characteristics Baseline malaria prevention characteristics 17 Results 25 Study Strengths and Limitations 26 Conclusions and Recommendations for Research, Policy and Practice 29 Annexes 33 Bibiliography FRONT AND BACK COVERS: A family in Voinjama, Liberia. OPPOSITE PAGE: A young girl cooking in Voinjama, Liberia. ©2014 International Rescue Committee | 122 East 42ND Street, New York, NY 10168 | Rescue.org Parents Make the Difference Executive summary An estimated 200 million children under the age of five in attending or represented by their spouse at all 10 group developing countries are not meeting their developmental sessions. Almost all participants reported being “very potential due to exposure to multiple risks including poverty, satisfied” with the program. lack of nurturing and responsive care, and poor health and 2. The intervention significantly reduced the use of nutrition. Among the many risk factors that negatively affect harsh physical and psychological punishment. child development, harsh parenting and inadequate cognitive Caregivers who participated in the program reported an and social-emotional stimulation have been consistently average decrease of 56% in the use of harsh punishment. associated with poor outcomes during childhood and across In particular, the percentage of caregivers who reported the entire life course. beating, whipping, or spanking their child in the last four The risks facing young children in low-income countries weeks decreased by 64%, 62%, and 56% respectively. and the implications for poverty reduction and development The use of psychological punishment (e.g., yelling) also indicate the urgent need for effective interventions in decreased by 29%. When asked what they did the last early childhood. Although evidence exists for effective time their children misbehaved, only 9% of caregivers interventions, most research and implementation has been in the treatment group reported beating their children concentrated in high- and middle-income countries, and compared to 45% in the control group. investment in early childhood programming remains low in Qualitative findings are consistent with the results above, the poorest countries, where children face the great risks. with the majority of interviewed caregivers reporting a Interventions targeted at improving parenting and caregiver– decrease in their use of harsh punishment. The most child relationships are one of the strategies with a robust common response was that they were no longer beating evidence base, mostly concentrated in high-income countries. their children or using other harsh forms of punishment A small but growing body of research from low- and middle- such as shouting and denying food. income countries suggests that such interventions may be feasible and effective in low-resource settings as well, but 3. The intervention significantly increased caregivers’ more rigorous research is needed. Furthermore, very few use of positive behavior management practices studies have been conducted on parenting interventions in and improved the quality of caregiver-child post-conflict settings. interactions. On average, caregivers in the treatment group significantly increased their use of positive behavior This report presents findings from a parenting intervention that management strategies, particularly time out. Also, both was implemented in post-conflict Liberia, where young children children and caregivers reported significant increases in face many of the risk factors identified as detrimental to their positive interactions (18% reported by children and 4% development. In 2012–2013, the IRC implemented a parenting reported by caregivers). Analysis of observation data from intervention, called Parents Make the Difference, in Lofa County, brief, unstructured play between caregivers and children Liberia. The IRC collaborated with Duke University to undertake did not reveal differences in the quality of caregiver–child an impact evaluation of the program using a randomized interactions, though this was measured by caregiver controlled trial design. The evaluation assessed the impact of verbalizations only—between the treatment and control the program on the following outcomes: 1) caregivers’ parenting groups. practices; 2) children’s cognitive, social, and emotional outcomes; and 3) malaria prevention behaviors. A total of 270 families Qualitative findings suggest that some participants participated in the impact evaluation. In addition, qualitative replaced harsh punishment with non-violent discipline interviews were conducted with a subset of 30 caregivers in strategies (e.g., time out) in response to new knowledge order to explore their experiences in the program. and skills that they had learned in the program. Participants also reported developing more positive Results relationships with their children, including spending more time talking and playing together. Caregiver responses 1. The intervention was feasible and acceptable in suggested that this improvement in interactions with their this low-resource, post-conflict setting.Participant children stemmed from their decrease in harsh parenting attendance was extremely high over the course of the behaviors, which in turn resulted in children being less program, with 98% of participants in the treatment group fearful of and more comfortable with their caregivers. 2 Parents Make the Difference In addition, some participants reported increased fighting within the family, and encouraging others to send recognition of their children’s physical needs and tangible their children to school. Some also reported helping to improvements in the ways they provided and cared for counsel other families and serving as a role model in the their children, as well as being more actively involved in community. These family- and community-level outcomes their children’s education. were not measured in the survey. 4. The intervention did not have a significant impact on children’s cognitive, emotional, or behavioral Conclusions and Recommendations outcomes. Children of caregivers in the treatment and for Research, Policy, and Programming control groups did not differ in their performance on 1. Parenting interventions are feasible and can be tests measuring verbal or numeracy skills. There were no delivered in resource-constrained, culturally diverse significant differences in children’s communication skills or and post-conflict settings. their social, emotional, and behavioral outcomes. Implementation of the Parents Make the Difference Qualitative findings suggest that some participants program in rural Liberia suggests that parenting observed improvements in their children’s academic interventions are feasible and can be delivered at a low motivation and achievement, and in their behavior and cost even in post-conflict contexts characterized by very social and emotional wellbeing. Some participants limited financial and human resources. The program was described their children as more motivated to attend and delivered by lay facilitators from Liberia and observations achieve at school, more obedient and respectful, and from program monitoring visits and fidelity monitoring better at social interactions with others. tools suggest that facilitators were able to deliver the 5. The intervention did not have a significant manualized intervention with fidelity. The feasibility of impact on malaria prevention outcomes. Reported lay workers or paraprofessional staff delivering the ownership and use of mosquito nets was high at baseline intervention is particularly relevant in low-resource, post- and post intervention for both treatment and control conflict settings where local capacity is likely to be limited, groups. There was no significant increase in mosquito net and will allow implementation at scale. ownership or use, or malaria prevention knowledge and High levels of participant attendance and satisfaction
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Legacy of War? Perceptions of Security in Liberia
    Liberia ARMeD ViOLeNCe aSSeSSMeNT Issue Brief Number 1 September 2011 A Legacy of War? Perceptions of Security in Liberia Within a 14-year period, Liberia en- when a group of insurgents of the The two civil wars claimed an es- dured two consecutive civil wars in Liberians United for Reconciliation timated 250,000 lives, decimating the what one scholar has called a ‘descent and Democracy (LURD) infiltrated pre-war population of roughly three into anarchy’ (Ellis, 1999). The first Lofa County from Guinea. Another million people, and displaced as many war—led by US–Liberian Charles group of insurgents, the Movement as 1.5 million people, including 700,000 Taylor—started in 1989 and ended for Democracy in Liberia (MODEL), refugees who fled to another country with a peace agreement in 1996, only subsequently attacked the Taylor (Foster et al., 2009, p. 247). Widespread to be followed by the election of government, entering the eastern part collective violence in Liberia finally Taylor as president one year later.1 of the country from neighbouring came to a halt with the Comprehensive The second war began in April 1999, Côte d’Ivoire in early 2003.2 Peace Agreement, signed in Accra in Stallholders set up their stalls in front of a bullet-marked building in Fissebu, February 2008. © George Osodi/Panos Pictures www.smallarmssurvey.org 1 August 2003. With President Taylor in conditions in mid-2010 improved concludes by summarizing key policy- exile, the National Transitional Govern- over the previous year. relevant findings. ment of Liberia was established to ease Around 70 per cent of respondents the shift from war to peace.
    [Show full text]
  • LIBERIA War in Lofa County Does Not Justify Killing, Torture and Abduction
    LIBERIA War in Lofa County does not justify killing, torture and abduction “One of the ATU [Anti-Terrorist Unit] told the others ‘He is going to give us information on the rebel business’. They took me to Gbatala. I saw many holes in which prisoners were held. I could hear them crying, calling for help and lamenting that they were hungry and they were dying.” Testimony of a young man detained at Gbatala military base in August 2000. Introduction The continuation of hostilities in Liberia cannot be used as a justification for killing, torture and abduction. Unarmed civilians are again the main victims of fighting in Liberia – a country still bearing the scars of its seven-year civil war when massive human rights abuses were committed by all sides with impunity. Since mid-2000, dozens of civilians have allegedly been extrajudicially executed and more than 100 civilians, including women, have been tortured by the Anti-Terrorist Unit (ATU) and other Liberian security forces. People have been tortured while held incommunicado, especially at the military base in Gbatala, central Liberia, and the ATU cells behind the Executive Mansion, the office of the presidency in Monrovia, the capital. Women and young girls have been raped by the security forces. All these victims were suspected of backing the armed incursions by Liberian armed opposition groups from Guinea into Lofa County, the northern region of Liberia bordering with Guinea and Sierra Leone. The security forces have mostly targeted members of the Mandingo ethnic group whom they associate with ULIMO-K 1 , a predominantly Mandingo warring faction in the 1989-1996 Liberian civil war, accused by the Liberian government of being responsible for the armed incursions into Lofa County in 1999, notably in April and August of that year and since July 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • USG West Africa Ebola Outbreak Regional ETU Status
    REGIONAL ETU STATUS TO EBOLA OUTBREAK IN WEST AFRICA Last Updated 10/31/14 ETU STATUS SENEGAL KEY LIBERIA Date KOUNDARA Gambia Open Country Border ELWA 3, Monrovia Open MALI GUINEA Closed Country Border ELWA 2, Monrovia Open MALI Island Clinic, Monrovia BISSAUOpen Prefecture/District/County Border Foya, Lofa Open Old MoD, Monrovia Open GAOUAL River or Lake Geba KOUBIA DINGUIRAYE SIGUIRI Unity, Monrovia Open Gbarnga, Bong Open National Capital Nov LABÉ TOUGUÉ SKD Stadium, Monrovia LÉLOUMA Bafing Tubmanburg, Bomi Nov Ebola Treatment Units (ETUs) Buchanan, Grand Bassa Nov BOKE USG Zorzor, Lofa Nov TÉLIMÉLÉ DALABA KOUROUSSA Operational In Progress Planned Supported Kakata, Margibi Nov PITA MANDIANA Sinje, GCM Nov Dalaba DABOLA Tappita, Nimba Nov FRIA BOFFA Ganta, Nimba Nov/Dec Mamou Laboratories Nov/Dec Established Voinjama, Lofa MAMOU FARANAH Fish Town, River Gee Dec KANKAN DUBRÉKA KINDIA L Zwedru, Grand Gedeh Dec Harper, Maryland Dec COYAH GUINEA Sources: CDC, WHO, State/HIU, OCHA/ROWCA, GADM Cestos City, River Cess Dec Wonkifong Kakata II, Margibi Dec Center Conakry Donka Forecariah Bopolu, Gbarpolu Dec SIERRA L Greenville, Sinoe Dec Institute FORECARIAH KISSIDOUGOU Totota, Bong Dec Pasteur BOMBALI KOINADUGU M’Balia Barclayville, Grand Kru Dec Rokel KEROUANE PHE PH Canada KAMBIA L L BEYLA Port Loko Makeni PHE L GUÉCKÉDOU PORT LOKO PORT LOKO KONO EC Beyla GUINEA L Gueckedou Macenta Gueckedou Open Freetown Lunsar TONKOLILI Koidu Voinjama Kailahun Donka, Conakry Open Lakka L Jui Hospital MACENTA Chinese CDC LEONE Foya Macenta Nov/Dec Police Training School PH Canada L EC Kerry Town L Wonkifong, Coyah TBD NICD L BO KENEMA Foya L PHE LOFA LOLA Forecariah TBD MOYAMBA Botown KAILAHUN CDC/NIH L NZÉREKORÉ Mamou TBD WESTERN L CDC/NIH Zorzor Nzerekore Dalaba TBD Yomou M’Balia, Kerouane Kenema Hospital Kenema CÔTE TBD GBARPOLU L Beyla TBD YAMOU Russia Nzerekore TBD BONTHE Ganta D’IVOIRE PUJEHUN Yomou TBD GRAND Bopolu CAPE MOUNT St.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Liberian English
    DOCUMENT RESUME FL 013 561 ED 226 617 AUTHOR Singler, John Victor; AndOthers An Introduction toLiberian English. TITLE Lansing. African Studies INSTITUTION Michigan State Univ.', East Center.; Peace Corps,Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 81 , NOTE 253p. 1 PUB TYPE Guides - Classroom Use -Materials (For Learner) (051) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC11 Plus Postage. Education; Dialogs DESCRIPTORS African Languages; *Cultural (Language); Grammar; LanguageVariation; *Listening Comprehension; *NonstandardDialects; *Second Language,Instruction; Standard SpokenUsage; Vocabulary IDENTIFIERS *English (Liberian); *Liberia ABSTRACT The aim of this text is tointroduce Liberian English, which includes the manyvarieties of English spoken by Liberians, to Peace Corps volunteers.The text is dividedinto two sections. The first part talksabout Liberian English,while the sedond part uses LiberianEnglish to describe aspectsof contemporary --------Li-berfairdiature. Part one containsdiscussions of the histories, varieties, pronunciation, and grammarof Liberian English. Where possible, differences fromvariety to variety of LiberianEnglish and grammar are noted.1Parttwo of the with regard to pronunciation i(referred to as text concentrates on"mainstream" Liberian English vernacular Liberian English),particularly as it is spokenin Monrovia. Emphasis is onunderstanding the type of Englishwidely by people who have gone toWestern schools. used in informal contexts understanding of the The aim of the text is tofacilitate volunteers' language; there is no emphasison learning to speak the language because of the Liberianattitudes toward varieties ofLiberian English other than LiberianStandard English. (NCR) **********************************************************.************* the best that can be made * * Reproductions supplied by EDRS are * * from the original document. *********************************************************************** is Jr) VC) C\I CD 1.1.1 AN INTRODUCTION TO LIBERIAN ENGLISH BY JOHN VICTOR S I NGLER wi th J.
    [Show full text]
  • Repatriation & Reintegration Operations in Liberia
    UPDATE NO. 2 March-June 2004 REPATRIATION & REINTEGRATION OPERATIONS IN LIBERIA MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS Spontaneous returns Liberian refugees continue to return home spontaneously from various countries in the region. Current estimates indicate that over 50,000 have returned since December 2003. UNHCR has registered more than 15,000 from Sierra Leone; 40% have ended up in camps in the Monrovia area along with IDPs as the conditions in their places of origin are not yet conducive for safe return. In the camp setting, returnees receive protection and assistance in the form of shelter, non-food items, trauma counselling, medical support, food from WFP and emergency Perry Town waystation [Photo: UNHCR, S.Brownell] schooling for the children. An estimated 20,000 have been returning from Guinea to Lofa County, mostly going to their districts of origin in what appear to be “go and see visits”. Meanwhile, there are reports that significant numbers are returning from Côte d’Ivoire due mainly to the prevailing security situation in that country. An estimated 5,000 have crossed into Grand Gedeh. High numbers of returnees have also been observed in the Counties of Bong, Grand Cape Mount, Maryland, Montserrado and Nimba. (continued overleaf) FUNDING SITUATION AT A GLANCE USD BUDGET 39,241,983 • An estimated 50,000 Liberian refugees have returned spontaneously from various countries in the region since CONTRIBUTIONS December 2003. Canada 602,142 • UNHCR has deployed upcountry with full-time presence in Denmark 1,153,213 Gbarnga, Saclapea, Zwedru and Tubmanburg, and part-time Finland 497,512 presence in Harper and Voinjama. Germany 612,745 • The deployment of UNMIL troops is proceeding on schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • Contested Citizenship in the Liberian Civil War∗
    A funeral for a friend: contested citizenship in the Liberian civil war∗ Morten Bøås Fafo – Institute for Applied International Studies Introduction During the period from 1980 to 2003 Liberia became synonymous with war, chaos and destruction. Fragmented by different militias that seemingly fought each other for no better reason than plunder and theft the country was presented as a primary example of a ‘new war’.1 There is little doubt that economic motives were important for the war and the establishment of many of the militias involved. However, militia formation was also a consequence of issues and tensions deeply entrenched in Liberian history. The Liberian conflict was not just one war. It was a series of local conflicts tangled up in each other, as Taylor's rebellion against Samuel Doe's dictatorship pushed the Liberian state over the edge and into the abyss. This ‘nationalisation’ of local conflict created a ‘logic of war’ that dramatically affected the course of the war, the decision making of the individuals involved, and the subsequent militia formation.2 The Liberian war was therefore a national conflict constituted by a series of local conflicts. This is vividly illustrated by the conflict between the Loma and the Mandingo in Lofa County. However, as this local conflict is closely linked both to similar controversies in neighbouring counties as well as to the instability in Guinea, the conflict pattern in Lofa will also be briefly contrasted to the tense situation in Nimba County between the Mandingo and the Gio and the Mano.3 Charles Taylor's ability to tap into pre-existing conflicts, first in Nimba and later in Lofa triggered the war, but these local conflicts were the combined outcome of conflict patterns preceding the Americo-Liberians and the administrative practices of their state.
    [Show full text]
  • LIBERIA ETU OVERVIEW Voinjama ± Foya !( !( 8°0'0"N 8°0'0"N Zorzor !(
    NOTES LIBERIA ETU(s) OUA Name USAID Name Beds City MGRS STATUS Barclayville Barclayville 100 Barclayville 29NNF8437918054 Site surveyed Bong Bong County 52 Suakoko 29NMH3869974307 Operational Bong II Unk 29NLH9443549820 Site surveyed Bopolu Bopolu 100 Bopolu TBD Site TBD Buchanan Arcelor Mittal Hospital (India) 100 29NLG8696649917 Site surveyed Cestos City Cestos City 100 Cestos City 29NMG3558504229 Site surveyed ELWA 2 ELWA 2 40 Paynesville 29NLG1236189998 Operational ELWA 3 ELWA 3 200 Paynesville 29NLG1189090530 Operational ELWA 4 ELWA 4 300 Paynesville 29NLG1204390376 Under construction Elwa Hospital Elwa Hospital Unk Paynesville 29NLG1230389948 Operational Firestone Firestone Hospital 100 Firestone 29NLH3743702463 Operational Fish Town Fish Town 100 Fish Town 29NPF2926173076 Site surveyed Foya Foya 75 Foya 29PLK6735966135 Operational Ganta Ganta 100 Ganta City 29NNJ0231800536 Site surveyed Greenville Sinoe 50 Greenville TBD Site TBD Harper Harper 100 Harper 29NPE4644089117 Site surveyed Island Clinic Island Clinic, Oniyama Specialist Hospital 160 Bushrod Island 29NLH0238206106 Operational JFK Hospital JFK Hospital 40 Monrovia 29NLG0385195257 Operational Kakata Kakata Save the Children 50 29NLH5384525578 Under construction Kakata II 100 29NLH5019523696 Site surveyed Ministry of Health Ministry of Health 100 Congo Town 29NLG1051492777 Under construction Old MoD Old Ministry of Defense 300 Congo Town 29NLG0814993399 Under construction Redemption Hospital Redemption Hospital Unk Monrovia 29NLH0175904425 Operational Sinje Sinje 100 Sinje
    [Show full text]
  • Lofa County Development Agenda Republic of Liberia Lofa County Development Agenda 2008 – 2012 County Vision Statement
    Lofa County Development Agenda Republic of Liberia Lofa County Development Agenda 2008 – 2012 County Vision Statement Lofa County shall be a united, secure center of excellence in the delivery of social and infrastructure services and poverty reduction for all. Core Values Equal access to opportunities for all Lofa citizens Restoration of peace, security and the rule of law Transparent and effective governance economic growth and job creation Preservation of natural resources and environmental protection Republic of Liberia Prepared by the County Development Committee, in collaboration with the Ministries of Planning and Economic Affairs and Internal Affairs. Supported by the UN County Support Team project, funded by the Swedish Government and UNDP. Table of Contents A MESSAGE FROM THE MINISTER OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS........! iii FOREWORD..........................................................................! iv PREFACE!!............................................................................. vi LOFA COUNTY OFFICIALS....................................................! viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..........................................................! xi PART 1 - INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1.1.!Introduction................................................................................................! 1 1.2.!History........................................................................................................! 1 1.3.!Geography..................................................................................................!
    [Show full text]
  • Liberia’S Shipping Register
    Recommendations contained on page 1 2nd edition:This report now incorporates a study by the International Transport Workers Federation (ITF) of the part played by revenues generated from Liberia’s shipping register. Taylor-made The Pivotal Role of Liberia’s Forests and Flag of Convenience in Regional Conflict A Report by Global Witness in conjunction with the International Transport Workers Federation (ITF). September 2001 Taylor-made— The Pivotal Role of Liberia’s Forests and Flag of Convenience in Regional Conflict Recommendations Preface The UN Security Council should: Through the imposition of targeted sanctions, G Immediately impose a total embargo on the exportation and the international community has transportation of Liberian timber, and its importation into other demonstrated its concern over the threat countries. Such an embargo should remain in place until it can be Liberia poses to regional security. Despite demonstrated that the trade does not contribute to the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in Sierra Leone and armed militias in Liberia, and recent overtures, this threat is still real: that it is carried out in a transparent manner (as referred to in para of Liberia continues to support the rebels of the the Report of the Panel of Experts appointed pursuant to UN Security Council Revolutionary United Front, and continues to Resolution () paragraph in relation to Sierra Leone). import armaments in contravention of the G Conduct further investigations into the Liberian timber industry, particularly the Oriental Timber Company (OTC), to enable the United sanctions. Nations Security Council (UNSC) and other members of the Liberia’s timber and shipping register are international community to gain a comprehensive understanding of the two key sources of revenue for the Taylor role of this industry in Charles Taylor’s presidency and the conflict in Sierra Leone and, increasingly, Lofa County in Northern Liberia.
    [Show full text]
  • LIBERIA MARKET PRICE MONITOR a Monthly Price Analysis of Food and Other Essential Commodities
    BULLETIN 20 September 2011 LIBERIA MARKET PRICE MONITOR A monthly price analysis of food and other essential commodities INTRODUCTION The September edition of the Liberia Market Price Monitor1 provides a synopsis of the rapidly changing prices and food security situation in the wake of tightening food markets arising from high global prices of essential commodities. Highlights • The previous upward pressure on domestic prices of imported rice has somewhat slowed during the month of September; • However, the world rice prices continue its upward trend as Thailand pricing plan creates global uncertainty on the international market; • Casual laborers are experiencing unfavorable terms of trade due to high prices for imported rice. NOMINAL”WHOLESALE” PRICE OF IMPORTED RICE In September 2011, with the exception of Foya Market in Lofa County, no local rice trade was witnessed in other markets of Liberia, even in the surplus producing areas of Bong and Nimba Counties. Additionally, Foya remains the only market that is not yet trading in imported rice this year – an indication that producing households in this region still have enough stocks from the previous harvest. As shown in the Table 1, with exception of Gbarnga and Voinjama markets, the rest of Liberian markets exhibited stability in the prices of imported rice between August and September 2011. Since the beginning of 2011, domestic markets have witnessed an upward pressure on price of rice. At the global scene, price of rice is still increasing, thus the September market development may only be but temporary stability as traders await next consignment. On the other hand, a year‐to‐year comparison in prices shows a general price rise in all markets with Gbarnga and Saclepea markets in central Liberia indicating the most dramatic increase of 40% and 38% Table 1: Nominal Price changes for 50kg bag of imported rice in LD respectively between 2010 (September 2010 ‐September 2011) and 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberia Education Update May 2019
    Liberia Education Update May 2019 Lofa Road on the way to Voinjama City, April 29, 2019. The rains have only just begun. Lofa River District I ended April and began May in the Lofa River District. District Superintendent, Rev. Cecelia Marpleh, and I traveled together in her pick-up truck from Gbarnga in Bong County to visit the Jemima Camp Freeman United Methodist School (UMS) in Voinjama City, Lofa County. I visited Voinjama several times since 2009 as we worked to renovate and reopen the school that was damaged and looted during the war. The school now has 115 students in nursery class through seventh grade. Water for Life built a latrine for the school with a gift from St. Paul’s UMC in Rochester, Michigan. There are 5 students in the 7th grade class and only one of them had a copy of the literature book, Why No One Knows When He Will Die. The need for required textbooks continues in schools throughout Liberia. While in Lofa, we also visited the recently established Foya United Methodist Church (UMC). The congregation speaks the Kisi language, but there was only a copy of the English King James Bible in the church. I was so happy to find a Kisi Bible at the Bible Society book store in Monrovia. I would like everyone to hear and receive the Word in the language they understand best. Back in Foya United Methodist Church, Lofa County Monrovia, I also found a copy of the literature book for April 30, 2019 each student in the 7th grade class.
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing Youth Project: Labor Market Assessment Report
    Advancing Youth Project Labor Market Assessment — Liberia This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development, USAID/Liberia Cooperative Agreement No. 669-A-11-00001 to Education Development Center. The content and opinions expressed within do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Advancing Youth Project: Labor Market Assessment i Acknowledgements The Labor Market Assessment (LMA) team hereby conveys thanks to the Government of Liberia and the Ministry of Education for the establishment of Alternative Basic Education program targeting unschooled youth. We would also like to express our appreciation to the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) for funding the Advancing Youth project. Special thanks to Mrs. Mardea Nyumah, of USAID in Monrovia for providing technical guidance and advice throughout the design and review process of the LMA. We are also grateful to Mr. S. Tornorlah Varpilah, the Minister of Youth and Sports for his contribution of time and information which formed an important part of this report. To the many traders and companies who were interviewed during the survey, farmers and traders who participated in value chain analysis and key informants from private sector, NGOs and government institutions, to all we owe you many thanks. The USAID/Advancing Youth team including partner organizations, Education Development Center (EDC), Mercy Corps and YMCA led by Chief of Party, Simon James, was instrumental in providing valuable administrative support and team coordination. To all team coordinators, thanks for the tireless effort. YMCA played a crucial role by providing competent youth assessors, who worked hard to design data collection tools, administered the assessment in the five counties and finalized data entry process smoothly.
    [Show full text]