Hunting Environment Impact Assessment for the Proposed Roum-Qaytouleh Responsible Hunting Area
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1 HUNTING ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED ROUM-QAYTOULEH RESPONSIBLE HUNTING AREA 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................2 Table of Figures ...........................................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. OBJECTIVE ...................................................................................................................................5 RATIONAL……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………6 SOURCE OF INFORMATION FOR THE REPORT……………………………………………………………………………..8 PRINCIPLE OF RHAs IN LEBANON…………………………………………………………………………………………………8 STUDY AREA CHARACTERISTICS…………………………………………………………………………………………………..9 THE HUNTING FOOTPRINT………………………………………………………………………………………………………..13 (a) Prey sPecies……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….13 (b) Changes in sPecies assemblages………………………………………………………………………………………..13 (c) Sustainability of hunting offtakes……………………………………………………………………………………….14 (d) Ecosystem function……………………………………………………………………………………………………………14 (d.1) Land use change…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..15 (d.2) Climate change imPacts……………………………………………………………………………………………….15 DISCUSSION…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….16 IMPROVED HUNTING PRACTICES & CHALLENGES……………………………………………………………….…….1Error! Bookmark not defined. GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF HUNTING IN THE ANJAR RHA. ..................................... 177 HUNTING STYLES IN LEBANON................................................................................................... 20 HUNTING DEPENDENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN THE PROPOSED ANJAR RHA AND THEIR IMPACTS ON BIODIVERSITY ....................................................................................................... 21 Tree Stands Management ...................................................................................................... 21 Grazing Management ............................................................................................................ 22 Habitat Management ............................................................................................................ 22 CroP Management................................................................................................................. 24 Field Margins and Hedgerows ................................................................................................ 26 Species Management .......................................................................................................... 277 1) Control of Diseases and Parasites ................................................................................ 277 2) Provision of SuPPlementary Food and Water ............................................................... 277 3 Predator control .................................................................................................................. 277 a) Effects of Predator Control on Game Birds ................................................................... 288 b) Effects of Predator Control on Non-game SPecies ........................................................ 299 c) Illegal Predator Control .................................................................................................. 30 d) Rearing and Releasing .................................................................................................... 30 e) Effects of Rearing and Releasing on Wild Stocks ............................................................. 31 Other imPacts........................................................................................................................ 31 MITIGATION MEASURES IN LINE WITH EU BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY 2020………………………………..31 MITIGATION MEASURES FOR THE SAFETY OF HUNTERS ............................................................. 31 Mitigation hierarchy and hunting as proposed by FACE…………………………………………………………….32 Hunting and sustainable use……………………………………………………………………………………………………..33 Hunting and Habitat Restoration………………………………………………………………………………………………33 Conclusion….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….34 MITIGATION MEASURES FOR THE SAFETY OF HUNTERS……………………………………………………………34 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................... 40 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 43 Table of Figures Figure 1: Illegal shooting of raptors in Lebanon…………………………………………….7 Figure 2: Illegal hunting of song birds……………………………………………………….…..7 Figure 3: MAP of Roum/Qaytouleh RHA .......................................................................9 Figure 4: Oak wood in Roum/Qaytouleh RHA .......................................................... 10 Figure 5: Pine wood in Roum/Qaytouleh RHA. ........................................................ 11 Figure 6: Bird species observed ................................................................................... 12 Figure 7: Different Types of Game Birds of Lebanon…………………………………...19 Figure 8: Grassland in mosaic managed for hunting…………………………………….23 Figure 9: Crop management…………………………………………………………………………..Error! Bookmark not defined. Figure 1: Field Margins and Hedgerows ..................................................................... 26 Figure 11: Predator Control ......................................................................................... 299 Figure 2: Top Predators (top row) and Meso-Predators…………………………….29 4 HUNTING ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED ROUM-QAYTOULEH RESPONSIBLE HUNTING AREA INTRODUCTION Hunting and humans are closely related. Humans have been hunting since the beginning of humanity, when the only food source was obtained by hunting. As time has passed, humans have progressed, and figured out many other sources of food, for example farming. Over Hunting kills wildlife which may be important to humans. This affects humans in that if the animal species, including bird, becomes endangered, it will throw off natural predation and it will be more expensive to buy the meat or the services of that animal. The endangerment of species can cause many different things to humans. For example, if one animal is endangered, its predator will also become endangered. Ultimately it will affect humans, with food, resources and ecosystem services. Hunting contributes large amounts of money to the country’s economy. It creates many jobs, where people can make a living for themselves and also it increases trades. With a strong economy the country can prosper and many benefits can be given out to the people of the country. Hunting contributes far more to the Canadian economy each year than the $823.8 million last reported by Environment Canada. This is a very large sum of money, and is a great source of income. Without hunting, wildlife damage would rise 221 per cent across Canada and the U.S., costing $70.5 billion a year. Countries cannot afford to lose this large amount of money, so they insist to continue hunting. These sources of income are selling the meat of the animal that has been hunted. Selling the fur, or other exterior parts of the animal, and lastly the money hunters spend on the hunting license and equipment itself. On the other side, hunting effects many things, including our own environment. Although generally most of the affects are negative, there are some positive effects to the environment. The positive effects include population control. Hunters kill animals that have large population, and this can cause those animals to die out due to the lack of food. Hunting these animals will help with population control. The money hunters spend on their hunting licenses may be pumped back into programs that help protect and enhance wildlife and the 5 environment. If hunting is well regulated, as sports or recreational involvement, there are no major affects to the species, if anything it may help bring back species from the edge of extinction. Many wildlife managers view sport hunting as the principal basis for protection of wildlife. Having said that, there are also many negative affects to hunting, which complete overshadow the positive effects. Hunting affects the biosphere, which is where the living organisms exist, it affects the biosphere because wildlife is directly related to the biosphere and hunting disrupts natural order. Overhunting will cause the decline in the particular animals species, this will effect everything around it, for example other animals, plants and trees. It directly affects the natural environment in that it throws off natural predation and population growth of the wildlife. Hunting also disrupts migration and wintering of birds and hibernation of mammals. This is because when animals go to migrate, they may be killed by hunters and due to fear, they may not hibernate or winter. The hunters themselves go on hunting trips, which causes them to drive long distances until they reach a hunting ground. This causes them to emit CO2, adding to their carbon footprint. Once the hunters arrive at their desired location, they usually set up a camp site. At the camp site there are campfires and a lot of littering, which is harmful to the wildlife. The smoke that is emitted by the fire negatively