Reading Tariq Ramadan: Political Liberalism, Islam, and ‘‘Overlapping Consensus’’ Andrew F

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reading Tariq Ramadan: Political Liberalism, Islam, and ‘‘Overlapping Consensus’’ Andrew F Reading Tariq Ramadan: Political Liberalism, Islam, and ‘‘Overlapping Consensus’’ Andrew F. March he interest of Western intellectuals in Islamic political and ethical tradi- tions (predominantly its traditions of warfare, but also of governance, Tsocial order, and gender relations) is now almost matched by our fasci- nation with ‘‘Islam in the West.’’ This interest quite naturally manifests itself in a focus on certain key public figures in European Islam, the single most prominent of which by far is Tariq Ramadan. The fascination with Ramadan is understandable. He is, on the one hand, a scion of political Islam—the grandson of Hasan al-Banna, the Egyptian founder of the Muslim Brotherhood (the wellspring of many of Islamism’s twentieth- century tendencies); and the son of Sa‘id Ramadan, one of the most prominent mid-century figures in the ‘‘Islamist International,’’ comprised of exiles from Muslim countries, local grassroots movements (from the Brotherhood to more radical ‘‘Salafi’’ groups), and the conservative oil monarchies. On the other hand, he is an outspoken advocate of the notion that European Muslims can be both European and Muslim in equal measure. He calls on Muslims to be active and engaged citizens of European countries, faithful to their constitutional systems, yet insists that this can be done without adopting a diluted, ‘‘liberal Islam’’ in matters of social and personal morality. On top of this, Ramadan is telegenic, articulate, multilingual, and charismatic. For a Western audience he is a unique Muslim media figure: neither a radical bogeyman a` la bin Laden or Khomeini (or one of their myriad imitators, such as Sheikh Abu Hamza al-Masri or even, significantly, Ramadan’s own brother, Hani), nor an outright secular liberal (ex-)Muslim a` la Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Irshad Manji, or Salman Rushdie. Given the current historical and political moment, Ramadan is an exciting and controversial figure; and it was perhaps inevitable that there should emerge a small journalistic and political industry dedicated to speculation on his ulti- 1 mate views or intentions. Underlying the scrutiny of Ramadan’s career and 399 views is not just a concern with whether this particular public intellectual is trustworthy, but a larger concern with whether and how Islam might be rendered ‘‘compatible’’ in the long-term with European conceptions of liberalism, mod- ernity, and social order. Ramadan is indeed an appropriate object of scrutiny for those interested in the placeofIslamintheWest.Hehaswrittenabout the possibility of an Islamic affir- mation of membership in European societies in perhaps the most self-conscious manner of any European Muslim thinker. While situating himself as much as pos- sible in a conservative Islamic legal and theological tradition (his book To Be a European Muslim is tellingly subtitled ‘‘A Study of Islamic Sources in the European Context’’), his treatment of the core matters of forging political community in the conditions of religious and moral diversity reveals a familiarity with the language and long-term concerns of political liberalism. It is less clear, however, of what pre- cise interest Ramadan’s writings ought to be and what should be expected from them. An early journalistic cliche´ pegged Ramadan as the ‘‘Muslim Martin Luther.’’ This awkward attempt to express a desire for an Islamic theology that would allow Muslims to endorse certain aspects of Western-style modernity nonetheless got it exactly wrong. Indeed, the last thing Western liberals ought to wish for is more ‘‘Muslim Martin Luthers’’ on top of the countless self-appointed, iconoclastic, back- to-the-text, literal-minded zealots who have appeared in the footsteps of Ramadan’s own grandfather. What was meant, of course, was that Ramadan might be a poten- tial ‘‘Muslim John Locke’’—that is, a thinker who would use religious and scriptural arguments to formulate a doctrine of religious tolerance and secular government. If this is why political liberals ought to be interested in reading Tariq Rama- dan, does he fit the bill? What exactly is the place of (possibly illiberal) religion in a liberal society, what constitutes a loyal affirmation of citizenship, and what positions cross the boundaries of reasonableness? Further, given that we prefer a single secular public language for deliberation, why should we concern ourselves at all with Islamic theological or juridical polemics? POLITICAL LIBERALISM AND RELIGION Much of the disagreement and controversy over Ramadan’s significance arguably stems not from a disagreement over what he is on record as having asserted or done but from unexamined or unarticulated assumptions about liberal princi- ples and what they demand of Muslims. 400 Andrew F. March Political philosophers often speak of two forms of liberalism: comprehensive liberalism versus political liberalism. Comprehensive liberalism is a way of life, a theory of value, and an epistemology. Comprehensive liberals value rational autonomy, critical scrutiny of tradition, skepticism, and experimentation. They make truth claims for these values and do not seek to disguise their incom- patibility with ways of life based on heteronomous deference to established authority. Comprehensive liberalism is often associated with the worldviews of Voltaire, Kant, J. S. Mill, and (more recently) Joseph Raz. Political liberalism, by contrast, is purely a doctrine of social and political cooper- ation. It seeks to elaborate the most reasonable public conception of justice and citi- zenship for free and equal persons, given the existence of disagreement on the ultimate meaning of life and the epistemological foundation for discovering it. Polit- ical liberals value the right to individual freedom from being coerced to live a certain way based on a certain conception of the good, as well as social solidarity based on mutual recognition and a fair distribution of resources. They also insist on the edu- cation of citizens so that they are aware of their freedoms and rights and of the need to recognize the equal rights of other citizens to these freedoms, but they do not pre- sume to educate citizens into a single worldview or epistemology. Political liberalism defends these terms of citizenship not as ‘‘true’’ but as the most reasonable given the fact of moral pluralism and—importantly—insists that these terms need not contra- dict the aims of most ways of life, particularly religious ones. This doctrine of social cooperation is most explicitly associated with the work of John Rawls (and many other contemporary liberal philosophers), but a tradition of similar thought might also be plausibly traced from John Locke to the decisions of the Warren Court. Many citizens of Western democracies are both comprehensive and political liberals. They value autonomy and critical thinking in their own lives and raise their children in this way, but do not assume that religious fellow citizens need to be taught the truth of these values in schools and other public institutions. Many citizens are comprehensive authoritarians but political liberals. They be- lieve in the truth of a revealed morality and raise their children to obey it, but do not seek to commandeer the state or other coercive authority to impose it on others (or even their own children). Of course, many citizens are not political liberals at all but (to continue to follow the philosophical jargon) ‘‘political per- fectionists’’: they think they know that their metaphysical (religious or secular) beliefs are true and that this alone justifies using public authority to transform society and the consciousness of its members. political liberalism, islam, and ‘‘overlapping consensus’’ 401 Which doctrine best characterizes contemporary European and North American societies? Broadly speaking, a form of political liberalism holds sway, although not usually by that name. Rather, we speak of societies that accommo- date diversity, religious freedom, pluralism, multiculturalism, fairness, and toler- ance. But the broad agreement with political liberalism is unmistakable: the state does not come down on one side or the other of metaphysical questions (Is there a God? Which revelation best conveys His instructions? What is the best way to live?); religious communities are tolerated so long as they respect human and civil rights and are left alone to perform their own exegesis and theology; the state is only permitted to interfere in the lives of individuals and minority com- munities insofar as this is necessary to defend the rights of vulnerable individuals or to protect legitimate public interests (such as security, public health, and so forth); and we expect that certain religious ways of life that do not affirm the pri- macy of individual freedom, scientific rationality, and absolute gender equality 2 will survive. Political liberals are thus faced with the task of identifying what exactly the minimum demands of ‘‘integration’’ are with special reference to Islamic doc- trine and the possible points of principled conflict. Integration into a liberal democratic society involves, I would like to submit, demands of justice and de- 3 mands of citizenship. Demands of justice relate to the broad range of liberal rights and freedoms that all citizens enjoy on an equal basis. There is no doubt that a committed Muslim can find within Islamic legal doctrine plenty of grounds for rejecting liberal conceptions of justice. Muslims are enjoined to ‘‘command the right and forbid the wrong’’; and a long tradition of juridical, political, and
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report
    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS ANNUAL REPORT July 1,1996-June 30,1997 Main Office Washington Office The Harold Pratt House 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021 Washington, DC 20036 Tel. (212) 434-9400; Fax (212) 861-1789 Tel. (202) 518-3400; Fax (202) 986-2984 Website www. foreignrela tions. org e-mail publicaffairs@email. cfr. org OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, 1997-98 Officers Directors Charlayne Hunter-Gault Peter G. Peterson Term Expiring 1998 Frank Savage* Chairman of the Board Peggy Dulany Laura D'Andrea Tyson Maurice R. Greenberg Robert F Erburu Leslie H. Gelb Vice Chairman Karen Elliott House ex officio Leslie H. Gelb Joshua Lederberg President Vincent A. Mai Honorary Officers Michael P Peters Garrick Utley and Directors Emeriti Senior Vice President Term Expiring 1999 Douglas Dillon and Chief Operating Officer Carla A. Hills Caryl R Haskins Alton Frye Robert D. Hormats Grayson Kirk Senior Vice President William J. McDonough Charles McC. Mathias, Jr. Paula J. Dobriansky Theodore C. Sorensen James A. Perkins Vice President, Washington Program George Soros David Rockefeller Gary C. Hufbauer Paul A. Volcker Honorary Chairman Vice President, Director of Studies Robert A. Scalapino Term Expiring 2000 David Kellogg Cyrus R. Vance Jessica R Einhorn Vice President, Communications Glenn E. Watts and Corporate Affairs Louis V Gerstner, Jr. Abraham F. Lowenthal Hanna Holborn Gray Vice President and Maurice R. Greenberg Deputy National Director George J. Mitchell Janice L. Murray Warren B. Rudman Vice President and Treasurer Term Expiring 2001 Karen M. Sughrue Lee Cullum Vice President, Programs Mario L. Baeza and Media Projects Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • Speakers & Programs
    NEW SPEAKERS & PROGRAMS FOR YOUR CAMPUS VOICES OF INCLUSION Speaking to the World APBSPEAKERS.COM 617.614.1600 50th Anniversary | MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. “There comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but he must take it because conscience tells him it is right.” -MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. Martin Luther King Jr.’s words are as relevant today as they were 50 years ago. A courageous leader whose vision for equality sparked monumental advances in civil rights, Dr. King adamantly opposed violence in his fight for justice. Now, as we celebrate his legacy amidst great political and social unrest in our nation, hear from other civil rights pioneers who continue to advocate for change and unity: Jesse Jackson, Diane Nash, Clarence B. Jones, Joyce Ladner and Bernice King. What’s Inside This Catalog Featured Programs.....................3 SHOWCASING TODAY’S TOP SPEAKERS, African-Americans....................7 this catalog will guide you in choosing the right voice to educate, entertain and inspire the entire campus Hispanics & Hispanic Americans...18 community at your next event. Asians & Asian-Americans........20 LGBTQ..................................21 “The best in the business.” Disability Awareness................22 -University of North Florida Native Americans.....................23 Index...................................24 2 VOICES OF INCLUSION . APBSPEAKERS.COM . 617.614.1600 FEATURED PROGRAMS OVERCOMING ADVERSITY STRONGER: Boston Marathon Bombing Survivors Jeff Bauman and Heather Abbott were ordinary people who set out to enjoy Marathon Monday in Boston on April 15, 2013. They never dreamed that day would change their lives forever. After an explosion led to amputations for both Bauman and Abbott, they vowed to overcome tragedy and rebuild their lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Irshad-Manji-On-Free-Speech-And
    Irshad Manji on Free Speech and Islam Nigel Warburton: Irshad Manji welcome to Free Speech Bites. Irshad Manji: Thrilled to be here! Nigel Warburton: The topic we are going to focus on is Islam and free expression. Now first off that sounds like two incompatible things. How can you talk about free expression in the context of Islam? Irshad Manji: Well, you know, I’m a person of faith: my faith is Islam. For me free expression is as much a religious obligation as it is a human right. What I mean is this: we Muslims as monotheists are to be worshiping one God - not God’s self-appointed ambassadors, which means no human being can legitimately behave as if he or she owns a monopoly on truth. And what that in turn means is that it is a spiritual duty for Muslims to then help to build societies in which we can disagree with each other in peace and with civility, because anything less means that we are playing God with one another – and that is the central sin in Islam. So, here’s the bottom line, a paradox if you will: devoting yourself to one God obliges you to defend human liberty. Nigel Warburton: That’s not obviously how this is being played out in term of Islam… Irshad Manji: Boy, do I ever know that! Nigel Warburton: So why do so many people go down another route and think that actually there being one God demands that you follow one particular set of rules, one particular view of what that God is like and what it is for that God to be offended? Irshad Manji: There are many reasons for this, and no excuses, but many reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Reverse Breakthrough: the Dutch Connection Hent De Vries
    Reverse Breakthrough: The Dutch Connection Hent de Vries SAIS Review of International Affairs, Volume 37, Number 1S, Supplement 2017, pp. S-89-S-103 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sais.2017.0017 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/673244 Access provided by JHU Libraries (20 Oct 2017 20:37 GMT) Reverse Breakthrough: The Dutch Connection Hent de Vries Introduction uring and immediately after World War II, the Dutch term doorbraak D(breakthrough) became a spiritual rallying cry for political renewal in the Netherlands.1 It designated the then decidedly progressive idea that religious faith should no longer exclusively, or even primarily, determine one’s political views and affiliations with political parties. Its ambition, first formulated by a group of functionaries who were taken hostage by the German occupation in Sint Michielsgestel, was to convince open-minded Roman Catholic and Protes- tants to join forces with social and liberal democrats and religious socialists to form one broad political party. Such a broad coalition of forces seemed neces- sary during the postwar period of wederopbouw (reconstruction); economic recovery and social consensus was imperative but a multitude of national wounds also required healing. The term doorbraak was used in the concluding lines of a speech by Wil- lem Banning in February 1946, at the founding congress of the Dutch Labor Party (Partij van de Arbeid, PvdA), when it joined the members of several parties that had been dissolved the day before: the Social Democratic Workers’ Party (Sociaal-democratische Arbeiderspartij, SDAP), the Liberal-Democratic Union (Vrijzinnig-Democratische Bond, VDB), and the Christian Democratic Union (Christelijk-Democratische Unie, CDU).
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Tariq Ramadan
    Interview with Tariq Ramadan Conducted by Latifa Al Rumaihi What is the specifi city of the has also to do with the context which Islamic concept of justice? makes it equitable. And the last word is al-Haqq which literally means the truth The concept of justice in Islam is based but it also means the right and when on three sources: the Quran and Sunnah you get your rights it is also justice are the two most important sources. which is perceived both as a goal and And then there is a third source which a principle at the same time. So in Is- has to do with ijtihād. Ijtihād means lam I used to translate the key principle that we have the principles, we have of Islam as justice but now after having the sources but we need to look at the written the book about the Prophet I situation to know how to implement have come to a different understanding them. Because justice is a principle and i.e. that justice is a condition of peace it is a goal. Between the principle and because the highest principle is to en- the goal there is a tension. We have to ter into God’s peace, with all your heart rely on the Quran and the Sunnah but and all your being. No justice no peace. also on rational refl ection. It is through this understanding that I Three words are important to under- understand the meaning of the ayah stand Justice in Islam. Al-‘Adl which is from the Quran that “God commands also a name of Allāh.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Fort Hood: Improving Our Ability to Connect the Dots
    LESSONS FROM FORT HOOD: IMPROVING OUR ABILITY TO CONNECT THE DOTS HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT, INVESTIGATIONS, AND MANAGEMENT OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SEPTEMBER 14, 2012 Serial No. 112–118 Printed for the use of the Committee on Homeland Security Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 81–127 PDF WASHINGTON : 2013 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY PETER T. KING, New York, Chairman LAMAR SMITH, Texas BENNIE G. THOMPSON, Mississippi DANIEL E. LUNGREN, California LORETTA SANCHEZ, California MIKE ROGERS, Alabama SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas HENRY CUELLAR, Texas GUS M. BILIRAKIS, Florida YVETTE D. CLARKE, New York PAUL C. BROUN, Georgia LAURA RICHARDSON, California CANDICE S. MILLER, Michigan DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois TIM WALBERG, Michigan BRIAN HIGGINS, New York CHIP CRAVAACK, Minnesota CEDRIC L. RICHMOND, Louisiana JOE WALSH, Illinois HANSEN CLARKE, Michigan PATRICK MEEHAN, Pennsylvania WILLIAM R. KEATING, Massachusetts BEN QUAYLE, Arizona KATHLEEN C. HOCHUL, New York SCOTT RIGELL, Virginia JANICE HAHN, California BILLY LONG, Missouri RON BARBER, Arizona JEFF DUNCAN, South Carolina TOM MARINO, Pennsylvania BLAKE FARENTHOLD, Texas ROBERT L. TURNER, New York MICHAEL J. RUSSELL, Staff Director/Chief Counsel KERRY ANN WATKINS, Senior Policy Director MICHAEL S. TWINCHEK, Chief Clerk I. LANIER AVANT, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT, INVESTIGATIONS, AND MANAGEMENT MICHAEL T.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Islam: a 40 Year Retrospective
    religions Article Political Islam: A 40 Year Retrospective Nader Hashemi Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA; [email protected] Abstract: The year 2020 roughly corresponds with the 40th anniversary of the rise of political Islam on the world stage. This topic has generated controversy about its impact on Muslims societies and international affairs more broadly, including how governments should respond to this socio- political phenomenon. This article has modest aims. It seeks to reflect on the broad theme of political Islam four decades after it first captured global headlines by critically examining two separate but interrelated controversies. The first theme is political Islam’s acquisition of state power. Specifically, how have the various experiments of Islamism in power effected the popularity, prestige, and future trajectory of political Islam? Secondly, the theme of political Islam and violence is examined. In this section, I interrogate the claim that mainstream political Islam acts as a “gateway drug” to radical extremism in the form of Al Qaeda or ISIS. This thesis gained popularity in recent years, yet its validity is open to question and should be subjected to further scrutiny and analysis. I examine these questions in this article. Citation: Hashemi, Nader. 2021. Political Islam: A 40 Year Keywords: political Islam; Islamism; Islamic fundamentalism; Middle East; Islamic world; Retrospective. Religions 12: 130. Muslim Brotherhood https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12020130 Academic Editor: Jocelyne Cesari Received: 26 January 2021 1. Introduction Accepted: 9 February 2021 Published: 19 February 2021 The year 2020 roughly coincides with the 40th anniversary of the rise of political Islam.1 While this trend in Muslim politics has deeper historical and intellectual roots, it Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral was approximately four decades ago that this subject emerged from seeming obscurity to with regard to jurisdictional claims in capture global attention.
    [Show full text]
  • “Muslims Are the New Jews” in the West: Reflections on Contemporary
    Uriya Shavit “Muslims arethe New Jews” in the West: Reflections on ContemporaryParallelisms This article examines aspectrum of contemporary textsbyMuslim essayists, scholars, and activists based in the Arab world, in Europe, and in the United States thatcomparativelyanalyzed Jewish experiencesinthe West as invaluable lessons for Muslim minorities. These included: antisemitism and the struggle against it; segregation from and integration into majoritysocieties; and political lobbying on behalf of the “greater nation.” The article argues that the diversityof Jewishrealities,past and present,and the general sense that Jewish minorities in the West ultimatelyfound ways to preservetheir religious identity while amass- ing social-political influence, have renderedcomparisons between Muslims and Jews an essentialaspect of different (and at times contesting) arguments about the future of Muslim minorities in the West. Introduction In 2012,Israel’sChannel 10,the country’ssecond-largest commercial television network, aired adocumentary series entitled “Allah Islam,” which painted an alarming picture of radicalizedMuslim communities in Europe. The series, de- scribed by several critics as uneven,¹ was met with exceptional public interest, with ratingsfor the network soaring to as much as 20 percent.The notion that Europe is being Islamized, or is under “Muslim occupation,” has been repeatedly articulated in recent years in Israeli media. Reports on European Jews (particu- larlyFrench Jews), who migrated to Israel or contemplate doing so and invoke their concern about Muslim attitudes to Jews as amain motivation, contribute to the imageofEuropean Muslims as an imminent threat.² In the past decade, Note: This is arepublication of the author’searlier publication of the same title in the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 36, no.
    [Show full text]
  • Islam's Pixie Provocateur Talks Allah, Liberty, and Love
    September 25, 2011 Islam’s Pixie Provocateur Talks Allah, Liberty, and Love By: Melik Kaylan It’s hard to believe that the bright-eyed figure with the elfin smile, sipping tea at her dining table, can provoke so much odium. One shouldn’t be too specific about where Irshad Manji lives or works. Many of the death threats she’s received claim to monitor her movements. Yet Manji refuses to mute her arguments or slow her pace in her fight to convince Muslims to “drop the groupthink” and follow their consciences as individuals. As director of the Moral Courage Project at New York University, Manji teaches from a score of hefty historical texts about free speech and diversity. If there’s a high likelihood of self-righteousness in such projects, one need only look at the many YouTube videos of Manji’s public appearances to see that she comes across without a hint of vanity, with a transparency so disarming that she seems unaffected by fame or threats—or even her punishing schedule. She lectures frequently and is featured regularly on television with the likes of Christiane Amanpour, Salman Rushdie, and Sir David Frost. She responds to innumerable disputatious emails from her highly interactive website—one that offers, among other things, a downloadable guide for Muslims contemplating interfaith marriage. She manages a Facebook community of 10,000 members, dispensing advice via a council of experts whom she has painstakingly selected. And she has published a new book, Allah, Liberty and Love, a rallying cry to Muslims—especially young ones— around the world to think and talk more freely, one that’s bound to incite great anger among authoritarian Islamists.
    [Show full text]
  • An Artist's Murder: Critical Reflections on the Relationship Between
    Pakistan Journal of Criminology Vol. 9, Issue 2, April 2017 (89-101) An Artist’s Murder: Critical Reflections on the Relationship between Contemporary Art and Muslim Political Sensibility Syed Sami Raza* Abstract In 2004 a young Dutch Muslim murdered a famous Dutch artist and film director, Van Gogh, in Amsterdam, Netherlands. The murder provoked an intense wave of propaganda against Muslims and Islam in Europe, particularly in the Netherland. The outburst of propaganda demonstrated how one single incidence of criminal act by a relatively unknown man of Islamic calling could put the peaceful identity of an entire community of Muslims under threat. This essay endeavors to place Van Gogh’s murder in its temporal and historical context. I engage other similar incidents and the resulting propaganda, and argue that the polemic that these incidents provoke often is not politically disinterested. Moreover, I argue that there is need to understand the troubled relationship between art and religion, especially as the appeal of violence draws a large number of people to its call. Keywords: Theo Van Gogh, Contemporary Art, Blasphemy, Political Sensibility, Terrorism. I: Introduction: The Murder On the morning of November 2, 2004, Mohammed Bouyeri, a young Morracan-Dutch Muslim, stabbed to death the famous Dutch film director Theo Van Gogh. The latter was riding a bicycle to his office. More audaciously Bouyeri stuck a note with a knife on Van Gogh’s chest, which carried a threatening message for his co- producer, and a women rights activist, Hirsi Ali. Ostensibly, one of the major reasons of the attack was the provocative film, Submission, which Van Gogh had directed in collaboration with Hirsi Ali.
    [Show full text]
  • „Islam Does Not Belong to Germany.” a Proxy Debate for an Insecure
    UPPSALA UNIVERSITY Department of Theology Master Programme in Religion in Peace and Conflict Master thesis, 15 credits Spring, 2019 Supervisor: Håkan Bengtsson „Islam does not belong to Germany.” A proxy debate for an insecure national identity? An analysis of a controversial German discourse and its underlying reasons. Submitted by Carlotta Mezger Table of Contents I. Introduction………………………………………………………………………...1 II. Method and Theoretical Framework………...……………………………………..5 III. Key Concepts and Previous Research…………...…………………….…………...7 • Belonging…………………………………………………………………..7 • Imagined Community……………………………………………………...9 • Political Islam…………………………………………………………….10 • German Leitkultur and Heimat…………………………………………...11 • Ian Buruma’s “Murder in Amsterdam”…………………………………..12 IV. History of Migration in Germany 1955 to Present……………………………….14 • The Churches……………………………………………………………..17 • The Basic Law…...……………………………………………………….18 • Emergence of Islam as the Problem……………………………………....19 V. Exploration of National Identity Threat Argument……………………………...22 • Herbert Blumer and Perceived Group Threat...……….…………………22 • Charles Taylor on “Modern Social Imaginaries”……………………….24 • The Indecisiveness of German Debate…………..………………...…….25 • Arjun Appadurai and “The Fear of Small Numbers”…………………...27 VI. Exploration of Cultural Citizenship Argument…………………………………29 • Arjan Reijerse et al. and Cultural Citizenship Representations…………30 • The German Leitkultur……………...…………………………………...32 • Samuel Huntington’s “Clash of Civilizations”.……….………………...34 • José Casanova and
    [Show full text]
  • A COMPARATIVE STUDY of REFORMIST and TRADITIONALIST CONCEPTIONS of the OBJECTIVES of SHARĪ'a by OMER TASGETIREN (Under the Di
    A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF REFORMIST AND TRADITIONALIST CONCEPTIONS OF THE OBJECTIVES OF SHARĪ‘A by OMERTASGETIREN (Under the Direction of Alan Godlas) ABSTRACT A comparison of the ideas of the reformist Muslim thinkers Khaled Abou El Fadl and Tariq Ramadan with those of the more traditionalist scholar Yusuf al-Qaradawi illustrates that, in contrast to what is generally assumed, there is substantial common ground between these reformist and traditionalist positions in four areas; human rights and democracy, women's rights, jihād and peace, and dialogue and collaboration. This consensus among these Muslim intellectuals on these important issues has arisen because they share a theory of interpretation that necessitates the utilization of and reliance upon "objectives of Sharī‘a" (maqāṣid al- sharī‘a) to adjudicate between conflicting points of view. Since these thinkers espouse this methodology of jurisprudence and do not differ substantially concerning their views of the foundational principles of Islam, it becomes possible for them to propound similar ideas regarding the four areas mentioned above. INDEX WORDS: Khaled Abou El Fadl, Tariq Ramadan, Yusuf al-Qaradawi, Objectives of Sharī‘a, Human Rights, Women Rights, Interfaith Dialogue, Democracy, Jihad A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF REFORMIST AND TRADITIONALIST CONCEPTIONS OF THE OBJECTIVES OF SHARĪ‘A by OMERTASGETIREN BA, Bogazici University, Turkey, 2005 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTEROF ARTS
    [Show full text]