Top 100 Conservative Websites by Global Alexa Rating

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Top 100 Conservative Websites by Global Alexa Rating Rank Name Alexa Rank 1 Fox News 161 2 WSJ Opinion Journal 212 3 Drudge Report 432 4 The Blaze 566 5 Breitbart 1,332 6 NewsMax 1,749 7 WND 2,082 8 IJ Review 2,193 9 Daily Caller 2,255 10 Washington Times 2,497 11 National Review Online 3,632 12 Town Hall 5,111 13 Free Republic 5,385 14 Instapundit/Pajamas Media 5,607 15 CNS News 5,628 16 Hot Air 5,792 17 Twitchy 5,860 18 Washington Examiner 6,203 19 Weekly Standard 6,262 20 NewsBusters 6,938 21 Heritage Foundation 7,992 22 Lew Rockwell 8,450 23 Reason.com 8,655 24 Glenn Beck 9,097 25 American Thinker 11,091 26 Rush Limbaugh 11,541 Tonya Mead Social Media Team Leader [email protected] August 9, 2014 Page 1 27 Western Center for Journalism 11,961 28 LifeSiteNews 15,141 29 Life News 16,750 30 Chicks on the Right 18,028 31 TPNN 18,127 32 The Libertarian Republic 18,281 33 Red State 20,777 34 The Matt Walsh Blog 20,779 35 Lucianne.com 20,815 36 The Gateway Pundit 21,031 37 AllenBWest.com 21,732 38 PowerLine 22,231 39 Front Page Magazine 22,540 40 The Right Scoop 22,863 41 Weasel Zippers 22,913 42 Right Wing News 23,747 43 Canada Free Press 23,930 44 Red Flag News 27,169 45 Mr. Conservative 30,145 46 The Common Sense Show 32,709 47 Ace of Spades HQ 34,671 48 Human Events 35,747 49 The Black Sphere 36,012 50 The Young Conservatives 37,010 51 Free Patriot 38,638 52 American Spectator 41,090 53 The Federalist Papers 44,002 54 Ann Coulter 46,481 Tonya Mead Social Media Team Leader [email protected] August 9, 2014 Page 2 55 American Conservative 47,406 56 Legal Insurrection 49,028 57 Washington’s Blog 49,168 58 Michelle Malkin 49,285 59 Pat Dollard 50,691 60 Jihad Watch 53,056 61 World Magazine 53,785 62 Freedom Works 54,064 63 Commentary Magazine 54,319 64 Patriot Update 60,645 65 Army Times 60,708 66 GOPUSA 61,037 67 American Renaissance 62,309 68 Barracuda Brigade 68,344 69 Dick Morris 69,577 70 First Things 69,946 71 Renew America 71,407 72 Day by Day 72,853 73 The Other McCain 74,326 74 Media Research Center 75,558 75 Conservapedia 77,086 76 Bill O’Reilly 78,640 77 Althouse 83,363 78 I Own the World 85,029 79 Daniel Pipes 85,067 80 Capitalism Institute 85,727 81 Sean Hannity 88,703 82 Linkiest 88,836 Tonya Mead Social Media Team Leader [email protected] August 9, 2014 Page 3 83 Vdare 89,462 84 Mark Levin 97,072 85 White House Dossier 97,224 86 Debbie Schlussel 97,577 87 Outside the Beltway 101,771 88 Doug Ross@Journal 110,262 89 Lonely Conservative 111,126 90 The Patriot Post 112,865 91 Da Tech Guy 118,742 92 The Conservative Tree House 120,449 93 Volokh Conspiracy 139,456 94 Moonbattery 151,646 95 Angry White Dude 156,880 96 Hugh Hewitt 158,960 97 100 Percent Fed Up 165,084 98 Restoring Liberty 165,159 99 Don Surber 195,522 100 PJ TV 217,594 Note: Click on the name (colored in blue). Hit Control Click on your keyboard to be taken directly to the site by hyperlink Tonya Mead Social Media Team Leader [email protected] August 9, 2014 Page 4 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Journalism's Backseat Drivers. American Journalism
V. Journalism's The ascendant blogosphere has rattled the news media with its tough critiques and nonstop scrutiny of their reporting. But the relationship between the two is nfiore complex than it might seem. In fact, if they stay out of the defensive crouch, the battered Backseat mainstream media may profit from the often vexing encounters. BY BARB PALSER hese are beleaguered times for news organizations. As if their problems "We see you behind the curtain...and we're not impressed by either with rampant ethical lapses and declin- ing readership and viewersbip aren't your bluster or your insults. You aren't higher beings, and everybody out enough, their competence and motives are being challenged by outsiders with here has the right—and ability—to fact-check your asses, and call you tbe gall to call them out before a global audience. on it when you screw up and/or say something stupid. You, and Eason Journalists are in the hot seat, their feet held to tbe flames by citizen bloggers Jordan, and Dan Rather, and anybody else in print or on television who believe mainstream media are no more trustwortby tban tbe politicians don't get free passes because you call yourself journalists.'" and corporations tbey cover, tbat journal- ists tbemselves bave become too lazy, too — Vodkapundit blogger Will Collier responding to CJR cloistered, too self-rigbteous to be tbe watcbdogs tbey once were. Or even to rec- Daily Managing Editor Steve Lovelady's characterization ognize what's news. Some track tbe trend back to late of bloggers as "salivating morons" 2002, wben bloggers latcbed onto U.S.
[Show full text]
The Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood: Who They Are and How American News Media Gets It Wrong
Jeremy Abrams The Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood: Who they are and How American News Media Gets it Wrong Jeremy Abrams 1 Table of Content I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 II. Defining Political Parties and their Role in Democracies ................................................................. 2 A. Generally ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 B. Structurally .................................................................................................................................................... 3 C. How the Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood Fit the Mold ................................................. 4 III. Brief Descriptions of the Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood ............................................. 4 A. The Tea Party ................................................................................................................................................ 5 1. History ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 2. The System in Which it Operates ..................................................................................................... 9 3. Official Status ........................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
The Pennsylvania State University Schreyer Honors College
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF JOURNALISM STORIES FROM THE FRONT LINES: FEMALE FOREIGN CORRESPONDENTS IN WAR ZONES JENNIFER CONNOR SUMMER 2011 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Journalism with honors in Journalism. Reviewed and approved* by the following: Tony Barbieri Foster Professor of Writing and Editing Thesis Supervisor Martin Halstuk Associate Professor Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. ABSTRACT The purpose of this thesis is to examine the experience of women who cover war and conflict zones, with a special focus on those reporting in Iraq and Afghanistan. When western female war correspondents work in male-dominated cultures and situations of war, they encounter different challenges and advantages than male war correspondents. The level of danger associated with the assignments these women take on is evaluated in this thesis. Anecdotes from female war correspondents themselves, combined with outside analysis, reveal the types of situations unique to female war correspondents. More women choose to follow the story and witness history in the making by covering today‟s war and conflict zones. This trend parallels the greater presence of women in newsrooms, today. This thesis will shed light on what it means to be a female reporting on and working in dangerous conditions. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………....1 Part 2. Dealing with Danger……………………………………………………………………...6
[Show full text]
How the U.S. Christian Right Is Transforming Sexual Politics in Africa
Colonizing African Values How the U.S. Christian Right is Transforming Sexual Politics in Africa A PUBLICATION OF POLITICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES BY KAPYA JOHN KAOMA Political Research Associates (PRA) is a progressive think tank devoted to supporting movements that build a more just and inclusive democratic society. We expose movements, institutions, and ideologies that undermine human rights. PRA seeks to advance progressive thinking and action by providing research-based information, analysis, and referrals. Copyright ©2012 Political Research Associates Kaoma, Kapya John. ISBN-10: 0-915987-26-0 ISBN-13: 978-0-915987-26-9 Design by: Mindflash Advertising Photographs by: Religion Dispatches, Michele Siblioni/AFP/Getty Images, Mark Taylor/markn3tel/Flickr This research was made possible by the generous support of the Arcus Foundation and the Wallace Global Fund. Political Research Associates 1310 Broadway, Suite 201 Somerville, MA 02144-1837 www.publiceye.org Colonizing African Values How the U.S. Christian Right is Transforming Sexual Politics in Africa A PUBLICATION OF POLITICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES BY KAPYA KAOMA POLITICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES i Colonizing African Values - How the U.S. Christian Right is Transforming Sexual Politics in Africa Foreword ganda’s infamous 2009 Anti-Homosexuality Bill, onstrates in Colonizing African Values that the Ameri- which would institute the death penalty for a can culture wars in Africa are growing hotter. Tracing U new and surreal category of offenses dubbed conflicts over homosexuality and women’s repro- “aggravated homosexuality,” captured international ductive autonomy back to their sources, Kaoma has headlines for months. The human rights community uncovered the expanding influence of an interde- and the Obama administration responded forcefully, nominational cast of conservative American inter- the bill was tabled, and the story largely receded ests.
[Show full text]
Chapter 4 the Right-Wing Media Enablers of Anti-Islam Propaganda
Chapter 4 The right-wing media enablers of anti-Islam propaganda Spreading anti-Muslim hate in America depends on a well-developed right-wing media echo chamber to amplify a few marginal voices. The think tank misinforma- tion experts and grassroots and religious-right organizations profiled in this report boast a symbiotic relationship with a loosely aligned, ideologically-akin group of right-wing blogs, magazines, radio stations, newspapers, and television news shows to spread their anti-Islam messages and myths. The media outlets, in turn, give members of this network the exposure needed to amplify their message, reach larger audiences, drive fundraising numbers, and grow their membership base. Some well-established conservative media outlets are a key part of this echo cham- ber, mixing coverage of alarmist threats posed by the mere existence of Muslims in America with other news stories. Chief among the media partners are the Fox News empire,1 the influential conservative magazine National Review and its website,2 a host of right-wing radio hosts, The Washington Times newspaper and website,3 and the Christian Broadcasting Network and website.4 They tout Frank Gaffney, David Yerushalmi, Daniel Pipes, Robert Spencer, Steven Emerson, and others as experts, and invite supposedly moderate Muslim and Arabs to endorse bigoted views. In so doing, these media organizations amplify harm- ful, anti-Muslim views to wide audiences. (See box on page 86) In this chapter we profile some of the right-wing media enablers, beginning with the websites, then hate radio, then the television outlets. The websites A network of right-wing websites and blogs are frequently the primary movers of anti-Muslim messages and myths.
[Show full text]
Shafiq Rahman
Curriculum Vitae Shafiq Rahman Professor and Chair Communication & Social Sciences Department Chadron State College 1000 Main Street, Chadron NE 69337 Tel: 308-432-6327 (work) [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. Mass Communication and Media Arts, December 2007 (Southern Illinois University, Carbondale). M.A. Communication, December 2001 (The University of Louisiana, Monroe). M.A. Mass Communication and Journalism, June 1992 (Dhaka University, Bangladesh). B.A. (Honors), Mass Communication and Journalism, June 1989 (Dhaka University, Bangladesh). EMPLOYMENT: UNITED STATES Professor (since August 16, 2015) and Chair, Department of Communication and Social Sciences at Chadron State College, August 2016—till date. Associate Professor, Communication and Social Sciences Department, Chadron State College, August 16, 2010—August 15, 2015. Assistant Professor, Communication and Social Sciences Department, Chadron State College, August 16, 2007—August 15, 2010. Instructor in record, School of Journalism, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, spring 2007(January— May). Teaching Assistant- School of Journalism, Southern Illinois University Carbondale (August 2003— December 2006). Research Assistant (quarter time), Aug. 2001- May 2001, and Aug. 2003-December 2006, School of Journalism, Southern Illinois University Carbondale. Research Assistant, Dept. of Mass Communications, The University of Louisiana Monroe, Aug 1999-May 2001. Shift Supervisor, Information Technology Computer Learning Center, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Aug 2001—May 2003. TEACHING I developed and taught a wide variety of classes in face-to-face and online formats. A significant part of teaching involves the instruction of graduate and undergraduate research methods and intercultural communication. I have also developed and taught media writing, media survey (introduction to media), communication theory, public speaking, persuasion, organization communication, and social media.
[Show full text]
Periodicalspov.Pdf
“Consider the Source” A Resource Guide to Liberal, Conservative and Nonpartisan Periodicals 30 East Lake Street ∙ Chicago, IL 60601 HWC Library – Room 501 312.553.5760 ver heard the saying “consider the source” in response to something that was questioned? Well, the same advice applies to what you read – consider the source. When conducting research, bear in mind that periodicals (journals, magazines, newspapers) may have varying points-of-view, biases, and/or E political leanings. Here are some questions to ask when considering using a periodical source: Is there a bias in the publication or is it non-partisan? Who is the sponsor (publisher or benefactor) of the publication? What is the agenda of the sponsor – to simply share information or to influence social or political change? Some publications have specific political perspectives and outright state what they are, as in Dissent Magazine (self-described as “a magazine of the left”) or National Review’s boost of, “we give you the right view and back it up.” Still, there are other publications that do not clearly state their political leanings; but over time have been deemed as left- or right-leaning based on such factors as the points- of-view of their opinion columnists, the make-up of their editorial staff, and/or their endorsements of politicians. Many newspapers fall into this rather opaque category. A good rule of thumb to use in determining whether a publication is liberal or conservative has been provided by Media Research Center’s L. Brent Bozell III: “if the paper never met a conservative cause it didn’t like, it’s conservative, and if it never met a liberal cause it didn’t like, it’s liberal.” Outlined in the following pages is an annotated listing of publications that have been categorized as conservative, liberal, non-partisan and religious.
[Show full text]
Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy
The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy Dr. Valerie Scatamburlo-D'Annibale University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada Abstract This article explores how Donald Trump capitalized on the right's decades-long, carefully choreographed and well-financed campaign against political correctness in relation to the broader strategy of 'cultural conservatism.' It provides an historical overview of various iterations of this campaign, discusses the mainstream media's complicity in promulgating conservative talking points about higher education at the height of the 1990s 'culture wars,' examines the reconfigured anti- PC/pro-free speech crusade of recent years, its contemporary currency in the Trump era and the implications for academia and educational policy. Keywords: political correctness, culture wars, free speech, cultural conservatism, critical pedagogy Introduction More than two years after Donald Trump's ascendancy to the White House, post-mortems of the 2016 American election continue to explore the factors that propelled him to office. Some have pointed to the spread of right-wing populism in the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis that culminated in Brexit in Europe and Trump's victory (Kagarlitsky, 2017; Tufts & Thomas, 2017) while Fuchs (2018) lays bare the deleterious role of social media in facilitating the rise of authoritarianism in the U.S. and elsewhere. Other 69 | P a g e The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy explanations refer to deep-rooted misogyny that worked against Hillary Clinton (Wilz, 2016), a backlash against Barack Obama, sedimented racism and the demonization of diversity as a public good (Major, Blodorn and Blascovich, 2016; Shafer, 2017).
[Show full text]
Who Supports Donald J. Trump?: a Narrative- Based Analysis of His Supporters and of the Candidate Himself Mitchell A
University of Puget Sound Sound Ideas Summer Research Summer 2016 Who Supports Donald J. Trump?: A narrative- based analysis of his supporters and of the candidate himself Mitchell A. Carlson 7886304 University of Puget Sound, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/summer_research Part of the American Politics Commons, and the Political Theory Commons Recommended Citation Carlson, Mitchell A. 7886304, "Who Supports Donald J. Trump?: A narrative-based analysis of his supporters and of the candidate himself" (2016). Summer Research. Paper 271. http://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/summer_research/271 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Sound Ideas. It has been accepted for inclusion in Summer Research by an authorized administrator of Sound Ideas. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Mitchell Carlson Professor Robin Dale Jacobson 8/24/16 Who Supports Donald J. Trump? A narrative-based analysis of his supporters and of the candidate himself Introduction: The Voice of the People? “My opponent asks her supporters to recite a three-word loyalty pledge. It reads: “I’m With Her.” I choose to recite a different pledge. My pledge reads: ‘I’m with you—the American people.’ I am your voice.” So said Donald J. Trump, Republican presidential nominee and billionaire real estate mogul, in his speech echoing Richard Nixon’s own convention speech centered on law-and-order in 1968.1 2 Introduced by his daughter Ivanka, Trump claimed at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, Ohio that he—and he alone—is the voice of the people.
[Show full text]
Restoring the Ideal Marketplace: How Recognizing Bloggers As Journalists Can Save the Press
\\server05\productn\N\NYL\9-2\NYL202.txt unknown Seq: 1 17-OCT-06 15:39 RESTORING THE IDEAL MARKETPLACE: HOW RECOGNIZING BLOGGERS AS JOURNALISTS CAN SAVE THE PRESS Joseph S. Alonzo* INTRODUCTION In May 2006, a California state appeals court became the first court to explicitly recognize that Internet journalists are afforded the same journalist’s privilege granted to traditional print and broadcast journalists. The defendants in O’Grady v. Superior Court maintained individual websites on which they published trade secrets about an unreleased Apple Computer (Apple) product.1 Unanimously overrul- ing the trial court, the appeals court held that the petitioners were pro- tected by California’s reporter’s shield law and the constitutional journalist’s privilege from being forced to testify about the identity of their sources.2 Because they were publishers of websites, and because they had published not news but the fruits of “trade secret misappropriation,” Apple argued petitioners were not “engaged in legitimate journalistic activities” and were not part of the class of persons protected by the California’s shield law.3 The court determined, however, that the peti- * J.D., 2006, New York University School of Law; B.A., B.J., University of Mis- souri, 2003. Many thanks to Professor Diane Zimmerman and to my colleagues on the New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, for their assistance and for putting up with me. 1. O’Grady v. Superior Court, 44 Cal. Rptr. 3d 72 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006). 2. Id. at 76. 3. Id. at 96–97. As the court explained, the California reporter’s shield is com- prised of two substantially similar sources of law: Article I, section 2, subdivision (b), of the California Constitution pro- vides, “A publisher, editor, reporter, or other person connected with or employed upon a newspaper, magazine, or other periodical publica- tion .
[Show full text]
(A Thousand Points Of) Light on Biased Language
Shedding (a Thousand Points of) Light on Biased Language Tae Yano Philip Resnik School of Computer Science Department of Linguistics and UMIACS Carnegie Mellon University University of Maryland Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA College Park, MD 20742, USA [email protected] [email protected] Noah A. Smith School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA [email protected] Abstract To what extent a sentence or clause is biased (none, • somewhat, very); This paper considers the linguistic indicators of bias in political text. We used Amazon Mechanical Turk The nature of the bias (very liberal, moderately lib- • judgments about sentences from American political eral, moderately conservative, very conservative, bi- blogs, asking annotators to indicate whether a sen- ased but not sure which direction); and tence showed bias, and if so, in which political di- rection and through which word tokens. We also Which words in the sentence give away the author’s asked annotators questions about their own political • views. We conducted a preliminary analysis of the bias, similar to “rationale” annotations in Zaidan et data, exploring how different groups perceive bias in al. (2007). different blogs, and showing some lexical indicators strongly associated with perceived bias. For example, a participant might identify a moderate liberal bias in this sentence, 1 Introduction Without Sestak’s challenge, we would have Bias and framing are central topics in the study of com- Specter, comfortably ensconced as a Democrat munications, media, and political discourse (Scheufele, in name only. 1999; Entman, 2007), but they have received relatively adding checkmarks on the underlined words.
[Show full text]
In the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 19-1392 In The Supreme Court of the United States THOMAS E. DOBBS, M.D., M.P.H., STATE HEALTH OFFICER OF THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, ET AL., Petitioners, v. JACKSON WOMEN’S HEALTH ORGANIZATION, ET AL., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit AMICUS BRIEF OF THE ELLIOT INSTITUTE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS THOMAS P. MONAGHAN JAY ALAN SEKULOW CECILIA NOLAND-HEIL Counsel of Record FRANCIS J. MANION STUART J. ROTH GEOFFREY R. SURTEES COLBY M. MAY AMERICAN CENTER FOR WALTER M. WEBER LAW & JUSTICE LAURA HERNANDEZ 1000 Regent University AMERICAN CENTER FOR Drive LAW & JUSTICE Virginia Beach, VA 23464 201 Maryland Ave., N.E. (757) 226-2489 Washington, DC 20002 (202) 546-8890 [email protected] Counsel for Amicus ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page QUESTION PRESENTED..................... i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES....................iv INTEREST OF AMICUS...................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT................... 1 ARGUMENT................................ 2 I. ABORTION IS A POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS PROCEDURE................3 A. Ambulance calls........................ 3 B. Maternal abortion deaths................ 5 II. THE CLAIM THAT ABORTION IS SAFER THAN CHILDBIRTH IS NOT SUPPORTED AND MOST LIKELY FALSE ............... 7 A. Relevance to abortion jurisprudence........ 7 B. Repetition of the fiction.................. 8 C. Refutation of the fiction and possible backpedaling.......................... 10 D. Dissecting the fiction................... 12 E. Response to contrary statements in Whole Woman's Health ....................... 19 III. PUBLISHED LITERATURE INDICATES THAT ABORTION IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN CONTINUED PREGNANCY......... 21 iii CONCLUSION..............................26 APPENDIX A: Correspondence with HHS/CDC . 1a APPENDIX B: Documented ambulance calls 2009-21 ............................... 10a iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page CASES City of Akron v.
[Show full text]