ATHERTON CIVIC CENTER Proposal Town of Atherton
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Architecture Planning Interior Design
“What is remarkable is the degree to which Bohlin Cywinski Jackson achieves the highest possible technical standards of construction, of energy management, of sophisticated program requirements, and still preserves such freshness and openness.”
Joseph Esherick, FAIA, AIA Gold Medal Recipient
Table of Contents
Letter of Interest 1 1 | Design Team 1 Firm Introduction 2 Design Team 3 Project Team Chart 4 Consultant Team 11 2 | Understanding of the Project 11 Approach 13 Facilities 15 Site 16 Landscape 17 Character 18 Relevant Project Examples 77 3 | Work Plan 78 Approach to Budget 80 Approach to Managing Project Design 81 Approach to Quality Assurance and Quality Control 82 Approach to Sustainable Design, LEED and Net Zero 84 Process 84 Master Plan and Concept Phases 87 Schematic Design 87 Design Development 88 Construction Documents 88 Bidding 88 Construction Administration 89 Hours Matrix 103 4 | Project Schedule 103 Schedule 105 Master Plan Review and Concept Design Phase 110 5 | Professional Fees Standard Hourly Rates Fees (in separate sealed envelope) 114 6 | Architectural Agreement 7 | Appendix Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Resumes Subconsultant Bios, Resumes and Scopes of Work
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Peter Q. Bohlin, FAIA Bernard J. Cywinski, FAIA (1940-2011) Jon C. Jackson, FAIA Frank Grauman, FAIA, LEED AP William D. Loose, AIA Cornelius J. Reid III, AIA Karl A. Backus, AIA Gregory R. Mottola, AIA Robert E. Miller, FAIA, LEED AP Raymond S. Calabro, FAIA Steven D. Chaitow, AIA, LEED AP BD+C David Murray, AIA December 10, 2014
Mr. Gordon Siebert City Engineer Town of Atherton 91 Ashfield Road Atherton, CA 94027
Dear Gordon and Civic Center Advisory Committee,
We are pleased to be shortlisted for Atherton’s new Civic Center and to submit our proposal for this exciting project. After touring the site and thorough analysis of the RFP documents, we have developed a deep appreciation for how important this project is in establishing a physical and symbolic center for your community. We have come to value the relaxed and intimate nature of the existing setting—an essential project element to maintain and build upon as we work with you in creating a true sense of place for the Town of Atherton.
Understanding the relationship between this new four-acre Civic Center site and the adjacent community, which includes residences, the 22-acre Holbrook Palmer Park, and historic Caltrain station, is key to addressing opportunities and concerns regarding heritage landscape, existing civil infrastructure, and noise associated with train and vehicular traffic. We will find inspired, cost-effective, and expressive solutions to address these complex challenges—something Bohlin Cywinski Jackson is known for.
There is also an important charge to create new spaces for the Town’s police force, permit center, administration, and library. Each of these disparate functions will need to be housed in warm and inviting places for both staff and visitors alike. The relationship of these new structures to the established landscape, and the strong residential character of Atherton, is also significant to this project and will require thoughtful consideration of human scale, attention to detail, and sensitivity to the relationship between building and landscape.
Our team has extensive experience with the multifaceted and multi-stakeholder nature of the public process. We appreciate the substantial progress already made though the Town’s master planning efforts in terms of scope, cost, and the identification of key issues. We look forward to an iterative process of listening, learning, and sharing with the Council, CCAC, staff, and community to design an appropriate, cost-effective, and inspired Civic Center for the Town of Atherton.
With best regards,
Steven D. Chaitow, AIA, LEED AP BD+C Principal [email protected]
Architecture Planning Interior Design 49 Geary Street, Suite 300 Wilkes-Barre / Pittsburgh / Philadelphia / Seattle / San Francisco San Francisco, California 94108 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 415-989-2100 www.bcj.com 1
DESIGN TEAM
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 3 Combs Point | Ovid, New York Design Team
San Francisco Office, Bohlin Cywinski Jackson
FIRM INTRODUCTION Bohlin Cywinski Jackson, founded in 1965, has of ces in We work in diverse environments to create new buildings San Francisco, Seattle, and three Pennsylvania locations: that are both timeless and of the present, blending Philadelphia, Wilkes-Barre, and Pittsburgh. Our work is scale, materials, and proportions of the surrounding fabric known for exceptional design, for its commitment to the to create places with a remarkable sense of belonging. particularity of place and use, and for an extraordinary Our work is rich and diverse in scale, character, and aesthetic based on a quiet rigor, which is both intuitive visual expression while consistently balancing the multiple and intellectual. We believe in an architecture that reveals agendas of tting into and enhancing the character of an the particular nature of its circumstances—the nature of its institution, integrating rigorous programmatic and technical place, the nature of its people, and the nature of how we responses, incorporating sustainable design principles, make things. . providing exceptional value within budgetary constraints, and creating memorable places that are a source of Bohlin Cywinski Jackson’s 12 principals and staff of pleasure to those they serve; these qualities have been 175 practice architecture and offer a broad range of recognized by more than 600 regional, national, and related services. The breadth and depth of our skills international awards for design, including nine national AIA and experience enable us to address a wide range of Honor Awards and the AIA Architecture Firm Award—the challenges—dif cult sites, demanding budgets, time highest honor bestowed upon any architectural practice. constraints, unusual technological requirements, and In addition, we have received three national awards for the the integration of new construction with existing buildings Top Green Projects of the Year from the AIA Committee and contexts. on the Environment. More importantly, these qualities have been recognized and appreciated by our clients and the people who live and work in the buildings we design. 1 San Francisco Office, Bohlin Cywinski Jackson
DESIGN TEAM The new Atherton Civic Center will require inspired, site agreement with the Owner. Working closely with Steve sensitive, budget-driven design, which demands a design will be Design Principal Greg Mottola, who will lead the team with a broad range of skills and clear team structure. design effort with the BCJ team and key consultants. Greg Bohlin Cywinski Jackson’s approach and process have and Steve will be available for all major project meetings resulted in projects consistently designed and built on with the Owner, including design presentations and any time and on budget. Our commitment, follow through, and public meetings that may be required. Senior Associate collaborative relationships have produced excellent results Josh Keller will our project manager and prime point of for the timely completion of projects with exceptional contact for the design team on a daily basis. He will be quality and value. Our team capitalizes on the experience the conduit for communications owing from the design and talents of people who have a long history of working team to the Owner’s project team, including Mack5. He together on similar assignments. In addition, our group of will manage design, technical detailing, and document highly talented consultants has worked with us on many production efforts. Lena Shah will assist the team as a projects and shares our belief in an integrative approach designer. With her background in both architecture and to all aspects of design. Together, we are committed to interiors, she brings an ability to harmonize the two to producing a spectacular project for the Town of Atherton. create highly re ned spaces. Also well versed in FF+E, she will be a resource for any help needed within this scope. As indicated in our Statement of Quali cations, our San This core team will be supplemented with input from Francisco of ce will lead this project with the same Principal Karl Backus, available as a design resource, and individuals proposed in the SOQ. This team of senior staff Founding Principal Peter Bohlin, who will provide design has a long history of working together, some dating back insights, inspiration, and leadership to the team. This to the early 1990s. As principal-in-charge, Steve Chaitow, group will be dedicated to the project from beginning to LEED AP BD+C, will facilitate overall management of end, augmented as needed to meet project demands with the project—ensuring delivery is in accordance with the other staff members from our of ce of 56 people.
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 2 The success of the Atherton Civic Center project will rely upon the collective experience and specialized skills of our broader design team of engineers and consultants. For your new Civic Center, which will be comprised of several different, programmatically complex elements, we propose to include a collection of core and specialty consultants, all of whom we have experience working on similarly complex projects (please see appendix for detailed firm profiles, proposed team member resumes, and individual consultants’ scope of work).
Town of Atherton
CCAC | City Council | Public
Steve Chaitow, Principal in Charge Gregory Mottola, Design Principal Josh Keller, Project Manager Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Mack5 Lena Shah, Project Designer/Interiors Architect Project & Construction Management Karl Backus, Design Resource Peter Bohlin, Founding Principal
Einwiller Kuehl Sarah Kuehl, Founder Landscape Liz Einwiller, Founder
Sherwood Design Engineers S. Bry Sarte, Principal Civil Drew Norton, Senior Associate
Rutherford+Chekene Bret Lizundia, Executive Principal Structural
Integral Group Tyler Bradshaw, Principal MEP/Sustainability
Niteo Jason Edling, Partner Lighting Key Anderson, Partner
Charles Salter Associates Cristina Miyar, Vice President Acoustics + Audio/Visual Lloyd B. Ranola, Principal Consultant
The Fire Consultants Jeffrey Maddox, Principal Fire Protection + Building Code Consultants Watry Design, Inc. Jess McInerney, Principal Parking Garage Design Michelle Wendler, Principal
The Preview Group Steven R Winkel, FAIA, PE, CASp Accessibility
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Kenneth A. Klein, Senior Principal Waterproo ng
Oppenheim Lewis Scott Lewis, Principal Cost Consultant
Jay Farbstein & Associates Jay Farbstein, Principal Public Safety and Facility Planning
To Be Determined (based on Town’s Preference) Security Consultant
3 KEY PERSONNEL
Drew Norton, Senior Associate
Drew Norton has extensive experience designing and managing the improvement plans and construction practices for residential, institutional, private and public projects necessitating lotting, utilities, water management, erosion control, road design, grading and drainage. Mr. Norton manages some of Sherwood’s most collaborative and innovative projects in California and has over ten years of engineering experience working in Santa Cruz, Monterey, Marin, San Mateo, Napa, San Francisco and Sonoma County. This expertise encompasses strict collaboration with various consultants and design standards associated to hillside developments. Education California State University, Sacramento Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering Mr. Norton has lead Sherwood’s role in the design of a unique project in St. Helena where the project team worked to develop innovative green
Professional Registration design solutions that met project goals for sustainability and aesthetics, Engineer in Training all on a 25% slope. Collaboration with the Structural Engineer on Board of Professional Engineers and retaining walls and large foundations along with collaboration with the Land Surveyors, State of California Geotechnical Engineer on sub-drain and back of wall drain design and a sensitive stormwater dispersal design along the steep slopes Professional Affiliations American Society of Civil Engineers, were major parts of this project. A water collection system of 80,000 Member gallons was implemented in this project in order to minimize stormwater discharge, offset irrigation and synergistically provide a thermal bank for a near passive mechanical system. Consultant Team Mr. Norton has managed design teams for large scale master planning and site analysis for international projects. Utilizing information such as GIS he has guided his team to perform detailed site analysis to maximize development while adhering to sensitive environmental regions. Some EINWILLERKUEHL Landscape Architectureof the tasks his design team have exercised for projects of any scale EinwillerKuehl is a are rm withdetailed a deep andcommitment conceptual to the road design siting, ecological systems integration of landscape and architecture, resulting in people-centric spacesintegration, that are developedgreen infrastructure, from the elaborate grading analysis, erosion client’s speci c desiresand andsediment programmatic control needs. plans,BCJ while implementing Best Management worked with Sarah Kuehl and Liz Einwiller on the Newport Beach Civic CenterPractices and Park when and they weresupervising with Peter CAD technicians in the production of Walker’s of ce in Berkeley.construction We are currently and workingnon-construction with documents. He has a consistent EinwillerKuehl on several high pro le residential projects in Big Sur, San Francisco,track record Calistoga, of and keeping Martis Camp, project work on schedule and under budget Einwiller Kuehl Landscape Architecture was founded in 2012 to build extraordinary placesas well by as at Apple’s Cupertino In nite Loop campus and while developing strong relationships with all the project consultants. combining Sarah Kuehl and Liz Einwiller’s complementary talents. Dominican University in San Rafael.
Sarah and Liz met while working at Peter Walker and Partners (PWP), where they collaborated on a diverse range of built projects. As a partner at PWP, Sarah led project visioning,SHERWOOD design DESIGN ENGINEERS concepts, and design strategy with Liz’s support and technical knowledge. As partnerCivil in charge Engineering of construction, Liz led detailed design, construction documentation, and field with Sarah’s support and design management. Sherwood Engineers’ practice is founded on sustainable principles. Their planning begins with speci c site research At Einwiller Kuehl design is a process that responds to the unique opportunities of the site and to assess environmental constraints and opportunities, the client’s needs. Einwiller Kuehl creates a project specific scaffold of imagery, precedents, details, consultants, fabricators, and craftspeople that supports innovation and qualitySANand control. their FRANCISCO process encourages the active participation ofNEW all YORK CITY HOUSTON Our complementary and cooperativeDESIGN internal structure ENGINEERS allows us to work with clientsparties and other involved, including clients, other designers, public www.sherwoodengineers.com team members in a spirit of lively collaboration and results oriented design. agencies, and the community. Local work includes the San Mateo Green Streets Guidebook and the civil infrastructure Significant civic projects completed by Sarah and Liz while at PWP include the University of and roadway design for the Santa Lucia Preserve. We are Texas at Dallas Campus Landscape Improvements and the Newport Beach City Hall and Park. presently working with Sherwood on a con dential, high Current projects include a long term vision plan and a series of strategic project basedpro le residence in San Francisco. landscape renovations for a corporate campus in Cupertino, California; the Design and Environmental clearance for a new park at the base of the Bay Bridge in Oakland, CA, the design of a temporary landscape adjacent to a historic structure for the opening of the BayRUTHERFORD Bridge, and + CHEKENE a private residence with significant gardens on a steep site in San Francisco. Structural Engineering
R+C has a history of working with teams and clients to deliver thoughtful, cost-effective structural solutions, including many projects on the Peninsula; these include civic centers and civic buildings in Mountain View,
Redwood City, and Walnut Creek, as well as over 30 years of working on the Stanford Campus. BCJ has worked with R+C for over 15 years. Projects include Pixar’s Animation Studios in Emeryville, a digital art center at UC Santa Cruz,
www.einwillerkuehl.com the Lorry I. Lokey Graduate School of Business at Mills st 874 41 Street Oakland, CA 94608 College, and a new museum and new 500-seat lecture hall 510-891-1696 Einwiller Kuehl Inc. at UC Davis, both in design/construction phases. R+C has With Rutherford + Chekene since 1988, Mr. Lizundia has 25 years of Bret Lizundia, SEsigni cant experience working in the structuralon the rehabilitation design of and office buildings, libraries, museums, renovation otherof historically civic buildings signi cant; seismicbuildings evaluationand provide and rehabilitation of existing Rutherford + Chekene Executive Principalsensitive structural(often buildings;solutions for peer such review projects. and plan checking; and applied research and guidelines development.
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson He was the project manager and co-author4 of FEMA 547 Techniques for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. He received the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute’s prestigious Shah Family Innovation Prize and the H.J. Brunnier Award from the Structural Engineers Association of Northern California (SEAONC). Bret has worked with Bohlin Cywinski Jackson on UCSC’s Digital Arts Research Center and is currently serving as structural engineer for their team on UC Davis’ new art museum.
Project Role Project Experience Principal Project Engineer Frank Lloyd Wright Hanna House Rehabilitation, Palo Alto, CA—Bret Education led the structural team in this rehabilitation of a national landmark. Hanna M.S., Structural Engineering, House was Wright's first use of a hexagonal design module and one of his Stanford University, Stanford most sophisticated Usonian projects. R+C rehabilitated the building under B.S., Civil Engineering, the guiding principle that the restored house appear untouched. Stanford University, Stanford Stanford University Renovations, Stanford, CA—Bret has a long Registration history working on the Stanford campus on both new buildings and historic Registered Civil and Structural retrofits. His recent work includes renovations at several of the campuses Engineer, California existing and historic student houses including Roth House, Xanadu House, Bob House and Roble Hall. Stanford Windhover Contemplative Center, Stanford, CA—The design of a 4,000 sf contemplation center, a unique reinforced rammed earth building; the Windhover Contemplative Center will function as a destination site for refuge and reflection within the Stanford campus for students, faculty, staff, as well as the greater community. UC Berkeley Student Community Center and Lower Sproul Plaza Revitalization, Berkeley, CA—This addition of a new building and renovations to three existing buildings is part of a new student community center in the heart of UC Berkeley. The center includes space for student meetings, events, and performances as well as individual reflection. Bret is currently principal structural engineer. Other Relevant Projects • Menlo College Library, Menlo Park, CA • Stanford University Lathrop Library Renovation, Stanford, CA • Roseland University Prep Campus, Santa Rosa, CA • City of San Francisco Department of City Planning San Francisco Unreinforced Masonry Buildings Study, San Francisco, CA • UC Davis Jan Shrem and Maria Manetti Shrem Museum of Art, Davis, CA (with BCJ) • UCSC Digital Arts Research Center, Santa Cruz, CA (with BCJ) • UC Berkeley California Hall Basement Renovation, Berkeley, CA
e nderson IALD LEED AP
ey s diversi ed approach and tenacity enables an anything is possi ble environment that s backed by a strong sense of design, along with the modern detailing, construction and procurement methods needed the continue designing landmark projects. eginning his career with years in Northern California, and later working from New ork, Singa pore okyo, he has ongoing and built projects around the world. His range of works includes master planning and civic projects, museums, corporate head uarters, mixed use and urban design, light artist installations, hospitality and healthcare.
(select design experience prior to Niteo Lighting, LLC) civic Newport Beach City Hall Newport Beach, CA Marina One Development and Masterplan Singapore Kurilpa Bridge Brisbane, Australia u lic Sa et Building orthern Cali ornia Con dential Songdo IBD Lighting Masterplan Incheon, South Korea experience Bruggemeyer Memorial Library Monterey Park, CA L , nc (1999-2004) cor orate + head uarters anks amos (2004-2006) Senior Designer Con dential Glo al Social edia Head uarters San Francisco, CA Bugatti Offices, etail Sho roo s Bei ing, China Arup Lighting (2006-2013) Office enant pro e ent enlo ar , CA Singapore Practice Leader Google nc Head uarters ountain ie , CA L A okyo (2013) Disney Grand Central Campus 3 Glendale, CA Associate, International Practice Saigon Centre Offices i ed use Ho Chi inh Cit , ietna Niteo (2013-present) education Managing Partner Stanford Graduate School of Business Stanford, CA UCLA Student Center Los Angeles, CA education CCSF Chinatown CampusFIRM PROFILE San Francisco, CA BS Architectural Engineering Charles M. Salter Associates, Inc. was founded in 1975. We consult in acoustics and design University of Colorado, Boulder museum + exhibit + artsaudiovisual, telecommunications, and security systems for buildings. With offices in San Francisco and San Jose, we are involved in over 900 projects per year worldwide. Our team of more than 50 DeYoung Museum comprises Professional Engineers, LEED Accredited Professionals,San Certified Francisco, Technology CA Specialists, affiliations Registered Communications Distribution Designers, Fellows of the Audio Engineering Society, Fellows California Academy of Sciencesof the Acoustical* Society of America, and a PhD, as well as individualsSan Francisco, with interdisciplinary CA and IALD Professional Member Tampa Museum advanced degrees in architecture, music, linguistics, business, and forensics.Tampa, We draw FLfrom this diverse expertise to develop solutions uniquely tailored to each project. LEED AP Mint Museum San Francisco, CA Providing high quality acoustical, audiovisual, telecommunications, and security design in civic centers, Miami Art Museum court rooms, libraries, community centers, and museums is critical to achieveMiami, speech intelligibilityFL in Miami Science Museum these noise sensitive-environments. The integration of design-appropriate acousticalMiami, treatments FL is INTEGRAL GROUP Asian Civilizations Museumimportant to the overall function and aesthetics of the space. Having consultedSingapore on thousands of civic Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, Fire Protection + projects, we rely on this experience to collaborate with the design team and develop solutions to meet Sustainability Future Memories Pavilion the unique goals and requirements of each project. Singapore Integral Group, led by Principal Tyler Bradshaw, provided Light Artist Exhibitor: “UP! and Away”* Sydney, Singapore, London, York MEP engineering for the LEED Gold Lorry I. Lokey Graduate School of Business building at Mills College, which utilizes passive and active façade integrated ventilation systems, hos italit as well as many other notable sustainable buildings. Tyler Franciscan Hospitality Center St. Helena, CA is presently leading the Integral team in collaboration with BCJ at UC Davis for a new 500-seat lecture hall building. Vineyard 29 Winery St. Helena, CA Integral Group is an industry expert in innovative energy ef cient strategies and specializes in LEED Platinum and Net Zero mechanical designs, which feature more envelope intensive analysis to reduce loads, and innovative building A arded ro ect systems technologies to meet those loads.
NITEO Lighting
Niteo was founded in 2013 from two top lighting designers who came out of Arup’s San Francisco of ce. With more than 25 years of project experience, Niteo provides the * projects by Jason Edling or Key Anderson prior to forming Niteo perfect balance of aesthetically pleasing lighting design coupled with analytical, approach-based engineering to provide the right character and quality of light that is energy ef cient and economical. Niteo has collaborated with BCJ on a number of recent award-winning projects that include the headquarters for Square, Newport Beach Civic Center (project done while at Arup), and con dential projects in San Francisco and Glendale, California.
CHARLES M. SALTER ASSOCIATES Acoustics + Audio/Visual
Known as experts in the eld of acoustics and AV, we’re including Charles Salter to assist us with the acoustical and AV systems for the project. Bohlin Cywinski Jackson has collaborated with Charles Salter on dozens of projects over the last 15 years, including Pixar Animation Studios, Square’s headquarters, Macromedia, and Twitter, as well as projects at Mills College, UC Santa Cruz, UC Davis, and a number of high pro le residences.
5 THE FIRE CONSULTANTS Fire Protection + Building Code
Led by Jeff Maddox, The Fire Consultants will assist our team with building and fire code compliance. We have collaborated with Jeff on dozens of projects over the years and have found him to be creative and highly collaborative
at navigating complicated code compliance strategies on complex projects. JEFFREY A. MADDOX, P. E.
ADDITIONALJeffrey A. Maddox TEAM is MEMBERS a Principal of The Fire ConsultantsSince submission Inc. and of isour a registeredSOQ, we havefire included the protection engineer with over 25 years of experience in fire protection, building code following additional firms to create a comprehensive, consulting and system design. He is registered as a Fire Protection Engineer in California and as a Professional Engineer in Oregoncapable and team, Colorado. for the Atherton Mr. Maddox Civic Center: holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Fire Protection Engineering from the University of Maryland, College Park, 1986. Watry Design, Inc | Parking Garage Design The Preview Group | Accessibility Mr. Maddox has worked with architects, developers,Simpson, owners Gumpertz and authorities& Heger | Waterproofing having jurisdiction to determine fire protection code compliance.Oppenheim LewisHe has | Cost been Consultant involved with the review of architectural projects through the designJay Farbstein phase and & Associates during construction. | Public Safety He Facility has prepared due diligence and fire protection evaluation reports and is familiar with Planning Consultant state, local and federal accessibility requirements. He has extensive experience with smoke control in high rise buildings. He also has experience with hotels, atria, educational, renovated, and mixed-use facilities in the U.S. and abroad. He has extensive experience with buildings utilizing operable windows and underfloor supply. WATRY DESIGN, INC. Mr. Maddox has used time exiting, fire resistance heat transfer principles, smoke Parking Garage Design development, and fire growth models as part of the justification for approval of modifications to fire protection requirements. HeFor hasthe undergroundbeen involved parking with projectsstructure, we have included utilizing base isolation systems and has developedthe Watry’s fire protection consulting concepts services. forRecognized these as experts in systems. He has developed operational and testing criteria for smoke control systems the field of parking structure design, we will consult with in high rise buildings, malls, atriums, and large industrial facilities. them on the planning and best practice details for the Mr. Maddox has current or previous professionalunderground affiliations parking with the structure National that Fire is contemplated as Protection Association (NFPA), Society of Firepart Protection of the Civic Engineers Center project. (SFPE), We have collaborated with International Code Council, Salamander HonoraryWatry Fire on severalProtection projects, Engineering such as Society,Newport Beach Civic ASHRAE Technical Committee 5.6, Smoke ManagementCenter, Disney’s and NFPAGrand SafetyCentral toCreative Life Campus, and Project Assembly, Fire Protection Features Committees.Stanford.
The following are Technical Papers, Publications, and Speeches that Mr. Maddox has contributed:
§. “Fire Protection for Asymmetric Atria,” two case studies, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Rocky Mountain Chapter, 1991.
§. “Smoke Control System Design for Atria,” National Fire Protection Association Annual Meeting, 1994.
§. “Smoke Control and High Rise Office buildings with Operable Windows: Two Case Studies,” ASHRAE Winter Meeting 2004.
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 6 THE PREVIEW GROUP Accessibility
Steve Winkel will assist our team with accessibility review. For a public building, especially one that includes the reuse of existing structures, having an expert in accessibility codes who can provide design review for compliance with law is a strategy we have used on many California projects openFIRM PROFILE to the public, including the Voyageur du Temps The Preview Group, Inc. (Preview) is an architectural consulting firm that specializes in providing regulatory solutions for our clients. We are experts in building codes, accessibility Bakeryfor persons inwith Los Altos and the Newport Beach Civic Center disabilities, regulatory issues affecting construction and construction document quality assurance review. The firm, established in 1986, provides services to building designers, owners project.and local code enforcement agencies. We help our clients determine the best path toward achieving building code compliance and construction document quality so that they may meet their goals.
Preview has played a major role in gaining code approval for a wide variety of projects for varied clients, both in the private sector and for governmental agencies. Recent projects include the seismic upgrade and renovation of the historic War Memorial Veterans Building in San Francisco’s CivicSIMPSON Center and new GUMPERTZ & HEGER student centers for the Santa Rosa Junior College and at the CSU Sonoma and San Marcos campuses. Other recent Preview projects include: the Oconee County Courthouse in South Carolina,Waterproo ng the National Underground Railroad Freedom Center in Cincinnati, the Textile Museum in Washington DC, and an accessibility survey of housing at Merrill College at University of California Santa Cruz, the renovation of the UCSC Hay Barn and an 8-story conference center and hotel for visiting scholars at UCLA.For waterproo ng systems and details, we include
The Preview Group, Inc. has two offices providing nationwide service. The home officeconsulting is in Cincinnati, time from SGH. We have collaborated on a Ohio. The west coast office is located in Berkeley, California in the San Francisco Bay Area. The services offered by our two offices include: code compliance reviews for new and existing buildings;signi cant accessibility number of projects with SGH over the years, consultation on the ADA, the Federal Fair Housing Act and on local building code and accessibility regulations; building and access code seminars; contract plan review; expert witnessincluding consultation and the Lorry I. Lokey Graduate School of Business, testimony regarding building code and accessibility issues. Preview also performs construction document Matthew S. Worster, P.E. quality assurance and constructability reviews. a multi-family development at Northstar for East-West Senior Project Manager – Building Technology Our six person firm is deliberately kept small so that the four principals: David Collins, FAIA/CBO;Partners, Steven various high pro le Apple retail stores, and 415-343-3053 Winkel, FAIA/PE/CASp; Greg Nicholls, AIA/CBO and Sarah Rice CBO can work directly with our clients. Three of the principals, David Collins, Greg Nicholls and Sarah Rice are Certified Building Officials and [email protected] have extensive experience as both project designers and code officials. This experienceseveral on both sides high of pro le private residences. They will review our the permit counter gives Preview a unique perspective on regulatory issues. David Collins, FAIA/CBO, firm founder and President, is recognized as an expert on the International Building Code.details He has and well speci cations, and be available to observe the Matt Worster has more than fourteenover forty years years of of experience experience in code usein investigation,and interpretation asdesign, a Building and Official as well as having been construction contract administratianon architectural of building project-envelope manager and components a representative on in theboth building historic code developmentinstallation process for and construction of those systems in the eld. several national building materials trade groups. Steven Winkel, FAIA, PE, CASp, West Coast office and contemporary structures. Hismanager, projects has have over fortyincluded years ofbelow experience-grade as waterproofinga project manager, and code consultant and quality traditional and modern roofing assuranceand wall manager. claddings. He is a CaliforniaHe holds licensed an architect, advanced licensed degree civil engineer, licensed landscape specializing in structural materials.architect Mr. Worsterand a Certified is experiencedAccess Specialist in (CASp), presenting a California his certification work to recognizing extraordinary knowledge in the field of disabled accessibility assessment and compliance. Steve is nowOPPENHEIM serving in his LEWIS both technical and nontechnical audiences.fourth four-year term as the Architect Commissioner on the California Building Standards Commission. He is also a member of the Board of Directors of the National Institute of Building Sciences. Cost Consulting Experience Preview participates actively in code development at the national, state, and local level. We take great pride in being recognized for our leadership in the strategic development and implementation of solutions Simpson Gumpertz & Heger forInc. our (SGH), clients for Sansuch thingsFrancisco, as: solving CA building, from code-related 2003 to problems,present. providing clientTo representation assist our team with the development of pre-construction during the building and zoning appeals process, providing expert witness advice and testimony, Simpson Gumpertz & Heger performingInc. (SGH), quality Boston, assurance MAreviews, Staff and providingI from contract1998 to plan 2 001.review services for variouscost jurisdictions. estimating, we include the services of Scott Lewis of In recognition of our expertise in code development Preview has for several years been engaged by the Registrations AmericanOppenheim Institute of Architects as code consultants Lewis to assist the AIA in monitoring andOppenheim participating in Lewis. Scott has worked for many institutional Design and Construction Administrationbuilding and accessibility code development processes throughout the nation. In addition, both Dave Civil Engineer UCSF – Mission Bay Campus,Collins San and StevenFrancisco, Winkel have CA. received (Mechanical the prestigious duct designation below -ofgrade Fellows of the Americanclients Institute and is very familiar with the Bay Area’s construction of Architects in recognition of their work in building code development and code education. California waterproofing.) costs market. He excels at doing early conceptual phase Vermont UCSF – Mission Bay Campus, San Francisco, CA (Reestablishment of flooring cost modeling, as well as the detailed cost estimates that protection under slab-on–grade.) Professional Engineer come later in the design process. We have worked with Alabama Denver Art Museum, Hamilton Building, Denver, CO. (Roofing and cladding repairs.) Colorado Scott on a number of projects over the years that include Oregon State Library and Courts Building, Sacramento, CA. (Terra-cotta repairs and roofing the Lorry I. Lokey Graduate School of Business at Mills and Scott B. Lewis replacement.) Other 22 Fourth Street, San Francisco, CA (Plaza and fenestration leakage.) Dominican University in San Rafael National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES) Sterling Memorial Library, Yale University, New Haven, CT. (Restoration of modern Record gothic library complex, architectural buttress reconstruction, concealed-masonry flashings, and slate and built-up roofing.) Education Christian Science Publishing House, First Church of Christ, Scientist, Boston, MA. Education:Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (PVC roofing, limestone cleaning and repairs, bronze window reglazing, metal B.S. in Civil Engineering Rensselaer, Cum Polytechnic Laude, Institute,cladding, 1984 and flashing.) 1998 Guidant Corporation, Santa Clara, CA. (EIFS repair and roofing replacement.) University of California B.S. Mechanical- Berkeley, Berkeley Engineering, CA Village at Centennial Square, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA. M.S. in Structural Engineering, Mechanics, (Building envelope.) and Materials, 2002 Investigation and Evaluation Professional Activities State Library and Courts Building, Sacramento, CA. (Historic facade, terra-cotta, ASTM International, Technical Contact for wood, and bronze7 windows investigation and evaluation.) Employment:ASTM E1105. Solano County Hall of Law and Justice, Fairfield, CA. (Roofing and concrete repairs investigation and evaluation.)
1984 - 1987 Self Employed,Dormitory Sanat Private Francisco, High School, CA Pebble Beach, CA (Wall and roof leakage and Cost Consultantflooring failure investigation.) Bank and Office Building, Palo Alto, CA (Cladding failure investigation.) 1987 - Present Oppenheim 22 Fourth Lewis, Street, Inc., San San Francisco, Francisco, CA (Plaza CA and fenestration leakage.) Founding Denver Principal Art Museum, Hamilton Building, Denver, CO. (Roofing and cladding investigation.) The Shangri-La, Doris Duke Estate, Honolulu, HI. (Roofing and plaster investigation and evaluation.) Scott Lewis is Founding Principal of the San HighlandFrancisco Corporate based constructionCenter, San Diego, consulting CA. (Wall firm and Oppenheim window leakage , adhered- Lewis, Inc. Mr. Lewis provides leadership to brickthe firm’s veneer projects, investigation and and one evaluation. of his primary) roles is to work with our clients to develop preliminary budgeting Sterling and Memorial scope strategiesLibrary, Yale for overallUniversity, cost New management. Haven, CT. (Roofing and granite/limestone masonry, water infiltration through masonry investigation and
Select Client/Projects List:
Cupertino Civic Center & Library San Mateo Main Library, Temporary Libraries & Branch Libraries Belvedere Tiburon Library Expansion Prewett Park Community Center
JAY FARBSTEIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Public Safety and Facility Planning
We have included a modest amount of consulting time Jay Farbstein & Associates, Inc. for Jay Farbstein & Associates to assist the Town and ourPublic Safety Facility Planning Experience team with program verification and proper layout of spaces for the police station. Jay and his colleagues understand the special needs of law enforcement and public safety
PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITYorganizations and can help our team carefully consider the interface with the public to balance security with PLANNING EXPERIENCE public service and special functions such as dispatch, emergency operations, detention, evidence handling and storage, crime and photo labs, squad rooms, and training and support spaces. We will engage Jay and his INTRODUCTION Jayteam Farbstein during the programming& Associates, and early Inc. design has phase broad to experience in planning public safetyhave him facilities. review our project planning for the police station and support the Town. BCJ collaborated with Jay on our Scranton Federal Courthouse project. • We have planned a wide range of public safety facilities, including:
TO BE SELECTED Security - Consultingcity police facilities - county sheriff’s departments and substations Many clients have a particular preference for their security consultant- state based police on working headquarters relationships and vendor preference.- correctional We have included facilities assumptions for scope and fee. -If Athertonborder does crossing not have astations preference, we will be happy - to workfire withstations you and Mack5 in the selection of an appropriate team.
• We understand the special needs of law enforcement and public safety organizations:
- carefully considering the interface with the public to balance security with public service - providing for special functions such as dispatch and emergency operations, detention, evidence handling and storage, crime and photo labs, report writing, squad rooms, briefing and training, locker rooms, vehicle maintenance, and the like. - working with the special culture of law enforcement.
• We are experts on prisoner holding facilities, having planned many correction and detention facilities.
• We fully understand operational and facility security planning and lead
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson our clients through a structured process8 of considering threats and appropriate responses to them.
• In planning for public safety facilities, we employ a range of methods, from statistical projections of the need for patrol officers and other staff, to interactive facility planning techniques such as focus and advisory groups, to functional and architectural programming, and graphic presentation of results.
FEATURED PROJECTS
City of Tracy – Public Safety JFA provided operational, space, and adjacency requirements for police and Master Plan fire facilities as a basis for development impact fees as consultant to Indigo Architects (2010).
[Illustration from Indigo?]
Page 1
UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 10 Pocono Environmental Education Center | Pennsylvania Understanding of the Project
Existing Library
APPROACH
Our approach recognizes architectural design as a of spaces and buildings comprising the site. To do this, powerful medium to address human needs and celebrate architectural design must engage a wider agenda and life. In designing a civic campus, we are almost always enhance the strengths and character of existing buildings working within the context of a master plan—sometimes and landscape. of our own authorship, sometimes envisioned by others. The adaptability of our approach demonstrates that the • Buildings are for people. By placing human needs, relationship of buildings to their surroundings, both natural comfort, and satisfaction rst, architecture can be an and built, can produce exceptional architecture. inspiration to people’s lives.
• Every client, program, and site is different. Each Civic buildings should not be viewed as self-suf cient project requires a unique response to the complex design statements. Architecturally, they should work at interaction of these in uences. several scales and in multiple contexts. Internally, they must support and foster the programs they house and the • Buildings shape places. Fine buildings achieve special culture of the community they serve—this requires a singularity appropriate to time and place as they spaces that meet people’s functional and social needs. resonate with their surroundings in the creation of a Practical issues such as service, accessibility, exibility, greater whole. legibility, security, and long-term maintenance must also be effectively and ef ciently addressed. Externally, a civic building should be integrated into the community
11 Historic Town Hall
• Environmental responsibility is a fundamental We understand the qualities of memorable, innovative, and obligation. Sustainable design principles and transformative places, and recognize the new Atherton processes should shape design at the root level. Every Civic Center presents an extraordinary opportunity project is an opportunity to educate and enlighten on to make a very special place to broadly support the the global effects of our actions. community’s needs.
• Adherence to practical realities is a prerequisite Our team’s initial conceptual vision for the Civic Center for exceptional design. Every project must rst is to create an environment that fosters community be functionally impeccable, exible, durable, easily and interaction for employees and visitors while being operated and maintained, and meet budgetary and contextually and sensitively situated to the well-developed schedule requirements. landscape and residential character of Atherton. It should • Design is enriched by collaboration. By listening and be a place that re ects and enhances the culture of the pooling our experience to gain a deeper understanding community while proving the necessary facilities for the of the true nature of each given situation, our clients Town’s services. and we together can produce places of surprising architectural power.
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 12 Existing Town Offices
FACILITIES
• The community should be engaged and delighted at • It is our understanding that the town has reached various scales, from clear and organized circulation to stasis point; while further growth is not expected, the well-considered space for a quiet conversation. nature of work performed and mix of services offered may change over time; our approach to designing • The building should foster interaction of employees, administrative of ces should allow for that future colleagues, and visitors by allowing opportunities evolution. for collaboration through exible spaces and open environments. • It is essential to replace the original police department building and the current makeshift support structures, • We’ll want to group functions and create adjacencies to provide an ef cient and functional building that to encourage community and maximize building meets user needs and accessibility codes. ef ciencies, serving both staff and community needs. • Service and controlled police access areas will need to • The current business and administrative services be separated and screened from the general public. of Atherton have evolved in size and type and are currently functioning in a series of buildings that emerged over time; as such, they formally present an accumulation of incremental architectural decisions rather than offering a cohesive experience. Creating that cohesive experience is one of the main charges of this project.
13 • Our approach to designing libraries addresses their • The interior of the library should provide an inviting, well- evolution from physical archive to communal spaces of lit area that is comfortable and warm through the use knowledge. In the digital age it is important to create of natural light and windows that connect the occupant places that people love and want to visit. back to their natural surroundings.
• The services provided by the library are both solitary • It will be equally as important to develop outdoor space and communal in nature; the new building should around the library. This will allow the library to host more provide social spaces for parents and children to activities like the ice cream socials and book exchanges explore together, authors to present work, readers to that occur now. have discussions, and places for individuals to read and study.
Existing Library
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 14 Adjacent Caltrain Station
SITE
• We recognize that the current site does not possess • Human-scaled open spaces of various sizes should be the sense of arrival one would expect for a Civic Center. interlinked and related to site buildings and circulation The creation of that sense and a real feeling of ‘there’ networks. once at the center will be essential. • Building access should be zoned to create secure • The Civic Center grounds should maximize a person’s parking for the Police Department and create easy connection to the site and Atherton’s local environment access to main entrances for the Town Administration. with improvements to automotive, rail, bike, and • Distributed parking on the site should be provided to pedestrian access. allow for convenient access to all buildings and site • Access through the site will need to be clear and amenities. functional for those passing through, yet allow • Parking will be used in the most ef cient manner, opportunities for re ection and interaction for whom the recognizing the demand and utility of vehicles for site it a destination. visitors and employees alike. • Access through the site will need to be clear and • Acoustic issues such as Caltrain and adjacency of functional, yet allow opportunities for re ection and nearby residences will be addressed through building interaction. With an ef ciently designed building, users placement, landscape, and use of materials, in will experience a variety of conditions that allow a conjunction with recommendations from our acoustical richer and more stimulating understanding of the built consultant, Charles Salter. environment.
15 Existing Site
LANDSCAPE
• Edges will be de ned and landscape enhancements • Landscape and ora will want to be integrated with will be cohesive with the rest of the Town’s natural interior and exterior spaces to connect users with aesthetic, creating a clear sense of place and identity. this exceptional site; the buildings will also want to • Landscape enhancements will want to be cohesive take advantage of Atherton’s mild climate and distinct with the rest of the Town’s natural aesthetic, creating a context by maintaining a strong connection to the clear sense of place and identity. outdoors. • Existing heritage trees will want to be integrated into • Infrastructure, including water control measures, such the design wherever possible after con rming the as bioswales, will want to be integrated into the site’s health of the trees. fabric, creating a landscape that is both a real pleasure and sustainable. • Service areas will want to be well screened with vegetation and or screen walls.
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 16 Outdoor Seating between Existing Library and Historic Town Hall
CHARACTER
• Contextual and timeless building materials, which need • Lighting will want to be minimally intrusive and re ect not be extravagant, will want to be smartly utilized the historic aesthetic of the existing light xtures. to provide a distinct sense of place; environmentally • The project is to respect the historical context of the conscious materials will be incorporated to create a site and community. Renovation of the Town Hall more sustainable setting. is preferred as it is well liked by the community and • Appropriate building placement and massing in a rich stands as a historic point of reference for the Town. landscape can yield rewarding results; the landscape • Lighting will be minimally intrusive and re ective of the will want to work in unison with buildings to create the historic aesthetic of the existing light xtures. character of the space.
• The line between interior and exterior will be blurred to allow smaller spaces to feel larger as they expand outward.
• The project will want to respect the historical context of the site and community; we understand renovation of the Town Hall is preferred if nancially feasible, as it is well liked by the community and stands as a historic point of reference.
17 Grand Teton Park Visitors Center | Moose Wyoming
RELEVANT PROJECT EXAMPLES
We have included several additional projects beyond those in the SOQ. These more thoroughly illustrate the range of our work relevant to Atherton’s Civic Center.
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 18 19 Newport Beach Civic Center and Park Newport Beach, California
The Newport Beach Civic Center and Park creates a new Project Relevance center of civic life for this Southern California beachside • Civic Center community. The form and expression of the City Hall are • Public project directly generated from sustainable strategies and the • Comprehensive public process democratic values of transparency, egalitarianism, and • Relationship of buildings and landscape collaboration. The rhythmic, wave-shaped roofs provide • Architecture reflective of place shelter for the two-story City Hall building, their generous • Addition and renovation work overhangs providing sun shading for indoor occupants. • Fundraising The entrance to the new Civic Center is marked by the • Program Manager collaboration council chamber with its iconic ‘sail’ and neighboring • FF+E scope transparent community space—the City’s ‘living room’. • Core-Shell design The Civic Green, bounded by the new garage and library • Subterranean construction addition, serve as the City’s ‘front lawn’. • LEED Gold • EIR process
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 20 Owner Key Strategies City of Newport Beach • Space reimagines the interaction of the public Size (citizen/visitor) and the city staff, developing a user- 100,00 SF City Hall/Emergency Operations Center focused experience 17,000 SF Library Addition • The literal and metaphorical use of transparency as 450 Car Parking a symbol of twenty-first century democracy 20 Acre Site • Clear identities for individual departments, alongside Completed interaction through shared facilities May 2013 • Hybrid custom/standard work station systems for Team Members open office areas add aesthetic benefit and long Bohlin Cywinski Jackson | Architecture term flexibility Steve Chaitow • Design incorporates significant sustainable/low- Greg Mottola energy strategies into the workplace such as, Josh Keller extensive day lighting and natural ventilation to Lena Shah reduce energy consumption Peter Bohlin • Building architecture reflects project site and Peter Walker & Partners (EinwillerKuehl) | Landscape Newport Beach contextual aesthetics Arup (Niteo) | Lighting Charles Salter Associates | Acoustical & AV The Fire Consultants | Code
21 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 22 23 1
3 2 78
5 6
4
1 COUNCIL CHAMBER 5 LIBRARY ADDITION 2 COMMUNITY ROOM 6 CIVIC GREEN 3 CITY HALL 7 ENTRY COURT VEHICULAR ENTRY 4 GARAGE 8 PARK PEDESTRIAN ENTRY
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 24 25 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 26 27 Lorry I. Lokey Graduate School of Business Mills College, Oakland, California
The 28,500 square foot Mills College Graduate School of Project Relevance Business is prominently located on the main entryway to • Relationship of building and landscape campus and reflects the vision and vitality of an institution • Architecture reflective of place focusing on the future. The building features wide • Fundraising covered porches across the front and sides, extending • Program Manager collaboration collaboration and community from the interior. Business • FF+E scope imperatives of transparency and interaction are reflected • Core-Shell design in floor-to-ceiling windows and skylights bringing in natural • LEED Gold light to stimulate intellectual energy. A LEED gold rating • Modest project budget confirms that this building has met rigorous criteria for • Local project energy efficiency, water conservation, and use of air and light.
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 28 Owner Key Strategies Mills College • Central positioning of social spaces in the building Size were key to Client’s desire to foster community, 28,000 SF peer-to-peer learning and collaboration
Completed • Organized social program to tie directly to outdoor May 2009 garden spaces, which double as usable program spaces (e.g. porch, outdoor classroom)
Team Members • Integration of sustainability as energy savings Bohlin Cywinski Jackson | Architecture measure and teaching opportunity for faculty, Greg Mottola staff, students and visitors Peter Bohlin Integral Group | MEP Rutherford + Chekene | Structural Charles Salter Associates | Acoustical & AV
29 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 30 31 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 32 33 Ballard Library and Neighborhood Service Center Seattle Public Library, Seattle, Washington
The Ballard Library and service center occupy a gently- Project Relevance sloping site adjacent to a new city park. The area has now • Library and neighborhood center become the Civic Core to the developing Ballard district, • Public project which is easily accessible by public transit, bicycle and • Comprehensive public process foot. • Relationship of buildings and landscape • Architecture reflective of place The architecture makes use of several sustainable building • FF+E scope design strategies. The “sod” roof is a European system • Core-shell design that absorbs water to be used later by planting material, • Subterranean construction substantially reducing runoff. The underside of the • Designed to LEED standards curving roof is a raft of engineered wood members. The • Modest project budget manufacturing of these timbers allows the use of laminated • AIA National Top Ten Committee and recycled wood in lieu of traditional solid sawn timbers on the Environment Award Winner while retaining the warmth and character of real wood. Owner Seattle Public Library Size 18,600 SF Completed May 2005
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 34 35 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 36 37 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 38 39 Creekside Residence Northern California
This house is a collection of clean, simple volumes. The Project Relevance central space is an open, airy ‘living pavilion’ that looks • Relationship of buildings and landscape out onto the natural landscape, and acts as a gallery to • Architecture reflective of place display the family’s collection of modern art and vintage • Significant heritage oak preservation furniture. The house’s materials are sympathetic to and • Residential scale complementary of their natural surroundings. A wall • FF+E scope of glass and pivoting glass doors capped by a deep, • Core-shell design cantilevered roof help lend this space a dramatic scale and • Local project guide the viewer’s gaze out to the surrounding site. Owner Confidential Size 12,000 SF Completed 2007
Team Members Bohlin Cywinski Jackson | Architecture Greg Mottola Peter Bohlin
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 40 41 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 42 43 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 44 45 Voyageur Du Temps Bakery & Cafe Los Altos, California
This former railroad depot built in 1913 has been Project Relevance transformed into the vibrant, welcoming bakery it is • Relationship of building and landscape today. Adaptive reuse of the facility required extensive • Architecture reflective of place modifications of the interior and west facing facade. A • Addition and renovation work portion of the original building, is now a main feature of • FF+E scope the new central space, clad in reclaimed redwood. The • Modest project budget relationship between kitchen and dining is symbiotic, • Local project as both are energized by a visible connection through a full-height glazed partition. The exposed culinary activity Owner fosters public intrigue while illuminating a bustling kitchen RieCo, LLC devoted to the art and craft of bread. Size 4,250 SF Completed 2014
Team Members Bohlin Cywinski Jackson | Architecture Greg Mottola
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 46 47 Before
After
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 48 49 Seattle Fire Station #32 Seattle, Washington
The fire station will be welcoming to the public as well Project Relevance as serving its function as an essential service facility. In • Public project addition to providing fast internal response routes for the • Public service programming fire fighters, interior spaces will be well-lit, comfortable and • Architecture reflective of neighborhood provide a strong connection to the neighborhood. A tall, • Subterranean construction glazed hose tower will act as marker for the fire station in • Designed to LEED standards a neighborhood which is rapidly becoming denser, and as • Modest budget a nighttime lantern, it will act as a beacon of safety for the • Essential services residents and visitors of West Seattle. Owner Seattle Fire Department Size 20,000 SF Completed In Progress
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 50 51 Vashon Island Ober Park Library King County Library System, Vashon Island, Washington
Located in a forested public park, the existing Library Project Relevance building had been set back from the road and concealed • Library by earthen berms, removing it both physically and • Public project psychologically from the street and park. The need for • Comprehensive public process additional space provided the opportunity to expand the • Relationship of buildings and landscape original Library, offering patrons views of the surrounding • Architecture is reflective of place park. The new addition slides underneath the existing • Addition and renovation work L-shaped building, preserving much of the original • FF+E scope structure. A full height wall of glazing is clipped to the • LEED Gold wood columns, opening the library to extraordinary views • Modest project budget of the park landscape. Owner King County Library System Size 9,800 SF Completed 2014
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 52 53 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 54 55 Admissions and Career Services Center at Trinity College Hartford, Connecticut
Approached through a grove of mature trees, the Trinity Project Relevance College Admissions Building defines one edge of an • Relationship of buildings and landscape intimate quadrangle. The three-story facility is slipped into • Significant heritage tree preservation the side of a hill with only the upper level visible from the • Architecture is reflective of place primary approach, dramatically reducing the building’s • Fundraising apparent mass. A transparent pavilion of timber, steel • Core-Shell design and glass, the top floor rests on the solid base formed • Subterranean construction by the lower two floors. The building’s materials convey • FF+E scope substance, warmth and welcome. Its fireplace, built of brownstone like much of the campus, marks the entrance Owner and central axis of the building. Trinity College Size 28,000 SF Completed 2001
Team Members Bohlin Cywinski Jackson | Architecture Greg Mottola Peter Bohlin
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 56 57 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 58 59 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 60 61 Issaquah Public Library King County Library System | Issaquah, Washington
The Issaquah Public Library is a branch library that Project Relevance represents an expansion and modernization of library • Library services for Issaquah, located in the heart of the historic • Public project downtown core. While future downtown planning called • Comprehensive public process for multi-story urban structures, the library use dictated • Architecture is reflective of place a single story. The cedar-sided structure resolves this • FF+E scope apparent conflict by using an exaggerated building height • Modest project budget with a trellis and canopies that maintain a humane scale at the street level. These scale elements relate to the cornice height of the neighboring buildings and visually secure the Owner building in its context. King County Library System Size 15,000 SF Completed 2001
Team Members Bohlin Cywinski Jackson | Architecture Peter Bohlin
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 62 63 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 64 65 Combs Point Residence Combs Point, New York
The residence at Combs Point is sited in a diverse natural Project Relevance world of glacial lake, deciduous and evergreen forest, • Relationship of buildings and landscape valley and stream. It is both a center of activity and a quiet • Architecture is reflective of place retreat for a family that treasures life on the lake. • Significant tree preservation • Residential scale From the fanning delta at the lake’s edge, a delicate • FF+E scope necklace of buildings stretches through a forested glen that leads to the waterfall at its head. An elevated Owner boardwalk echoes the twisting course of the stream as it Confidential connects the buildings and eventually dissolves into a path Size leading to the falls. 8,400 SF
Upstream, the guesthouse and office-exercise structures Completed inhabit the narrow valley meadow with its forested edges. 2010 Downstream, the main building’s large living space opens to a full view of the deep lake, broad sky and the weather. Team Members Bohlin Cywinski Jackson | Architecture Slipped into the site with a light touch, the residence and Peter Bohlin its outbuildings possess a transparency that reveals the richly varied qualities of this natural place.
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 66 67 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 68 69 Frick Environmental Education Center Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy | Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
The Environmental Education Center is designed to Project Relevance achieve the sustainable requirements of the Living Building • Public space Challenge: a fundamentally different approach to building • Library design, construction, and operation that strives to achieve • Relationship of buildings and landscape net zero water and energy use. This will be achieved by • Architecture is reflective of place capturing rainwater, recirculating gray water, cleaning • Historic restoration wastewater, and by using photo-voltaic solar panels to • Net Zero energy and water generate electricity • FF+E scope • Modest project budget The design for the 15,000 square-foot facility comprises indoor flexible classrooms/meeting areas, a library/ Owner resource room, a reception area for public as well as Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy private functions, office space for 25 people, volunteer facilities, restrooms, an outdoor, wooded amphitheater, Size storage, and other support facilities. Also included in the 15,000 SF scope of work is the restoration of two historic gatehouses Completed designed by John Russell Pope, architect of the Jefferson In Progress Memorial; restoration of the fountain and original entry, additional outdoor learning spaces, and landscape/ Team Members wetland restoration. Bohlin Cywinski Jackson | Architecture Peter Bohlin .
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 70 . 71 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 72 Apple Store, Stanford Palo Alto, California
This two-room, pavilion-concept store was designed for Project Relevance a unique location within Palo Alto’s Stanford Shopping • Architecture is reflective of place Center. Though the store’s design takes a fresh and • FF+E scope evolutionary direction, the traditional display featuring • Core-shell design Apple’s retail products continues to serve the customer’s • Local project shopping experience. A broad, glass-enclosed room makes the retail environment feel part of the outdoor plaza Owner and the outdoor plaza part of the retail environment. With Apple Inc. 180 lineal feet of storefront glass and three entrances, rarely has a store been so visually recognizable and Size physically accessible. Its design invites you directly inside 11,900 SF to experience the Apple product. Completed 2013
Team Members Bohlin Cywinski Jackson | Architecture Karl Backus Peter Bohlin The Fire Consultants | Code
73 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 74 WORK PLAN
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 76 SheldonCreekside Gatehouse Residence | Cle | Northern Elum, Washington California Work Plan
Henry Island Residence | San Juan Island, Washington
Proactive schedule control, cost management, and energy First costs and long-term operating expenses for new performance planning are essential to achieve a successful buildings are profoundly affected by the choice of project. A project must be thoroughly planned in its use conceptual design alternatives. Site orientation can affect of time and resources to enjoy the results of predictable, heating and cooling loads and access to natural light. orderly processes. Ef cient, cost effective buildings re ect Minimizing the disturbance of a site has cost, ecological, the importance of integrating appropriate building systems and aesthetic implications. Careful evaluation of the in ways that are easily constructed. These qualities require building code can offset the need for costly systems, such sure-footed design and technical decisions, and a culture as structural re-proo ng or smoke evacuation, often with of open interaction among all members of the team, little or no impact on a building’s spirit, function, or safety. including the Town’s staff, representatives from the Civic Attention to choices and detailing of materials and major Center Advisory Committee, mack5, the Design Team and systems can save construction and maintenance costs. in the construction phase, the Contractors.
77 APPROACH TO BUDGET
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson believes in the following principles to achieve these goals:
• Cost management to adhere to a fixed budget equiresr important, but major cost impact decisions occur finding the best balance between three project in the project’s conceptual phases, when the best parameters: scope, quality, and budget. This is true fit between program needs, building systems, and for design decisions at all scales, from the integration site conditions can be evaluated, controlled, and of systems, to the allocation of space and quality of integrated in the design. All concepts are tested materials in those particular locations where benefit is against their cost implications, so decisions can be greatest. seen as a process of allocating resources.Meaningful cost control choices are available throughout the • The greatest cost savings can be achieved early in design process as technical details are refined and the design process when all aspects of the project are documented. Cost control continues through the fluid, and when major scope/quality/budget trade- procurement process when a strategy of bidding offs can be thoroughly evaluated and implemented. alternates is crucial to permit adjustment in response We will begin by validating the site and building to current market conditions at the time of bidding. programs with you, and testing probable costs of Refinements throughout the process are important, integrated components to determine their effect on the but major cost impact decisions occur in the project’s budget. Meaningful cost control choices are available conceptual phases, when the best fit between throughout the design process as technical details program needs, building systems, and site conditions are refined and documented. Cost control continues can be evaluated, controlled, and integrated in the through the procurement process when a strategy design. All concepts are tested against their cost of bidding alternates is crucial to permit adjustment implications, so decisions can be seen as a process in response to current market conditions at the time of allocating resources. of bidding. Refinements throughout the process are
Major In uence Rapidly Declining In uence Low In uence
O s p ge po an rt Ch uni of ty fo Cost r In uence
Planning and Schematic Design Construction Construction Programming Design Development Documents
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 78 The Barn at Fallingwater | Western Pennsylvania
• Detailed cost tracking and con rmation will begin with • The costs and bene ts of potential sustainable design the master planning and conceptual design phase, concepts are equally important to address, beginning and continue during each subsequent phase. Value early in the design process. Bohlin Cywinski Jackson engineering processes will occur on a rolling basis designs all of its projects to take advantage of the as decisions on design alternatives are evaluated. long term savings offered by an integrated design Cost con rmation will occur at each phase through approach, which recognizes the interrelated nature of estimates provided by Mack5 and our cost estimator all aspects of the project. We have completed many to track conformance with the Town’s budget. Bid LEED-certi ed projects employing a broad range of alternates will be identi ed to easily enable cost passive and technical sustainable solutions selected adjustments in response to market conditions at time for their appropriateness to each project’s speci c of bidding without impacting the project schedule. This circumstances and budget. approach is founded on aligning the project’s scope, quality, and budget parameters early in design and then instituting processes that track and maintain this balance throughout design and documentation phases to allow the Town and design team to make informed decisions in an orderly, rather than reactive, manner.
79 APPROACH TO MANAGING PROJECT DESIGN Our approach to the design process is founded on an and 3) conceptual master planning and design of multiple inclusive working style. We believe that working with our alternatives. This allows us to simultaneously address: the clients is more effective than simply working for them. built site and natural environment; the social, functional, Intensive, highly interactive meetings that include key environmental and technical programs; and sustainable members of the design team and the Town’s stakeholders design concepts, all in the context of early detailed cost, ensure the best design outcome. Putting our designers scheduling, and construction phasing models. on-site for regular meetings allows design concepts to emerge from discussions through sketches that are quickly We also believe simultaneous development and re nement generated, reviewed, and adjusted in real time. of multiple conceptual design solutions, concurrent with programming and master planning activities, is essential Good design, whether seen as rational problem solving to maximize the exploration of cost-ef cient design or intuitive and visionary, requires a degree of non-linear alternatives that test ideas and identify opportunities and thinking. Our way of combining the bene ts of freeform synergies. Often, the nal desired design solution evolves exploration with those of a well-ordered sequence is to use from hybrids that merge the best attributes of several viable several parallel processes. Our approach begins with 1) concepts. understanding your circumstances 2) program re nement,
Combs Point Residence | Ovid, New York
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 80 APPROACH TO QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL Several aspects of our practice are central to the quality of our documentation and services:
• We use a single design team from the project’s inception through its completion. The project is not passed from a programming department to a design department to a production department. The design team’s core of principals, project managers, and key staff are continuously involved in all stages. This ensures early intentions are fully implemented in the technical drawings. The same team is involved during construction administration, so the application of documents to the construction process is similarly seamless.
• Our engineering consultants are integrated with the conceptual design process from the beginning. We do not design a building architecturally and then ask our engineers to make it work. Rather, we address technical concerns from the earliest programming discussions, merging architecture, site, environmental, and technical systems into an interrelated whole. Designs are developed and re ned with an integrated vision of how the building will be built and how it will function.
• We care about the details, dedicating serious attention on how materials and systems come together. This is a distinguishing quality of our architecture and is based on a discipline of technical excellence.
• We make full use of review processes, including cost and constructability reviews, whether by internal peer reviews, third-party reviewers, independent cost Poconos Environmental Education Center | Pennsylvania estimators, or by inviting contractors’ input during the design process.
• We are experienced with construction norms and code issues in California and are currently working throughout the state.
81 APPROACH TO SUSTAINABLE DESIGN, LEED, AND NET ZERO Integrating environmentally responsible and economically We have long known that most sustainable design viable sustainable design strategies is a fundamental principles do not add cost if implemented as part of a professional obligation. Our work in the area of what has holistic design conception. We believe responsible energy come to be known as ‘sustainable design’ spans four use and materials selection require consideration at the decades. Beginning in the late 1970s with a modest Girl inception of the design process, when the site and building Scouts’ Program Center, funded by a Department of con gurations rst take shape. Many of our clients see the Energy Grant to demonstrate passive solar technology, we value of investing beyond these ‘free’ bene ts. Our design have continued to pursue this aspect of design through team offers energy modeling, lifecycle cost analysis, and commissions such as the Preger Intelligent Workplace the research skills needed to make sound environmental Research Center at Carnegie Mellon. This project received investments. both an AIA National Honor Award, as well as a Business Week/Architectural Record Honor Award for its innovations While U.S. Green Building Council LEED certi cation in creating a sustainable workplace. has not become universal, the majority of our corporate, educational, and governmental clients seeks certi cation Bohlin Cywinski Jackson has received numerous awards or seeks to design to a standard equivalent to certi cation. for sustainability, including three Top Green Projects of the We are experienced in LEED processes, have several Year from AIA National’s Committee on the Environment LEED accredited professionals on our team, and have for projects such as the Barn at Fallingwater in Mill Run, many projects that have received or are in the process of PA; the Ballard Library and Neighborhood Service Center obtaining LEED certi cation. in Seattle, WA; and the Pocono Environmental Education Center in Dingmans Ferry, PA. In addition, the Newport We also believe in revealing sustainable design responses Beach Civic Center and Park was awarded a 2013 Green as a teaching tool and to create a ‘living laboratory’ that Good Design Award. provides building users and visitors with direct, hands- on opportunities to gain a better understanding of
Frick Environmental Center | Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 82 Newport Beach Civic Center, Garage | Newport Beach, California environmental issues. Our project for Ballard Library The climate of Atherton is an extraordinary asset—its incorporates a number of simple but effective interactive benign temperature allows the indoors and outdoors to exhibits that encourage awareness, exploration, and coalesce. We foresee capitalizing on this asset in ways that learning. do more than reduce mechanical equipment investments and energy expenditures; the use of natural ventilation and Despite the rapid evolution of technology in advancing lighting will enhance the basic feel of the buildings and the frontiers of how buildings can better respond to our outdoor activity places. The sensual pleasure of connecting demands for sophisticated internal control while minimizing with the outdoors by sight, sound, and breeze will enhance environmental impact, we think there is still a very important human activity and interaction, and make the Civic Center place in the sustainability equation for the traditional values a place of and for the community. of good design basics founded on fundamental human values. The things that make us happy, calm, productive, With these qualities in mind, we have assembled a and comfortable do not change very much from one consultant team that understands building technologies generation to the next. Really well designed buildings have work in conjunction with users to create ef cient buildings. always recognized this truth and it is one of the reasons we Integral Group (MEP) and EinwillerKuehl (landscape) preserve well-liked, older buildings and adapt them to new regularly collaborate with architects to create extraordinary uses. We approach all of our assignments with the goal of and sustainable places. Integral Group is a global consulting creating architecture that is exible, adaptable, and valued and engineering rm known as “building physicists” with so it will continue to be appreciated and adapted to new an extraordinary record of successful building systems uses well into the future. innovation. EinwillerKuehl is known for their environmentally sensitive design founded on natural habitats that use native plants suited to climate to reduce maintenance and create awareness of regional ecosystems.
83 PROCESS MASTER PLAN AND CONCEPT PHASES
To achieve these goals, Bohlin Cywinski Jackson believes The RFP breaks the design services scope of work into in the importance of a detailed work plan to make the initial seven categories and identi es tasks and deliverables and long term process understandable from the outset; beginning with the Master Plan Review and Conceptual everyone will have a road map of the task sequence to be Design Phases, which starts with a kick-off meeting to performed as we move through a layered decision making introduce team members and establish schedule and process, proceeding from broad conceptual decisions budget. through increasing levels of detail and speci city. In these overlapped phases, the design team, having Our approach to this scope of work plan de nes a process absorbed the background reports, surveys, historical organized around a regular schedule of meeting workshops, information, and existing master plan, will begin to develop each with a detailed agenda and de ned between-meeting an overall program and the appropriate allocation of tasks to be performed by the design team and the Town. resources. We nd it useful to subdivide the analysis This format provides advanced insight into the nature into four parallel but interconnected tracks that utilize of the design and decision making process, while also the research and information learned from your recently revealing the underlying order necessary to enable us to completed Master Plan: Site Program, Human Program, easily adjust to the sometimes non-linear nature of project Environmental Program, and Technical Program. development. The goal is to structure a process that invites participation and ef ciently focuses the talents and energy • The Site Program summarizes all the external inputs to of everyone involved through all project phases. the design circumstance. We seek to understand how to best use the land; its relationship to surrounding natural, human-made, and cultural situations; infrastructure and ecological needs; accessibility; zoning requirements; parking; service; utilities; views; climate; sunlight; wind; and qualitative goals for architectural character.
University of Puget Sound | Tacoma, Washington
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 84 • The Human Program complements the Site budget. To meet that goal, we clearly communicate the Program, looking at the building from the inside out, alternatives for how the sustainable and energy design understanding how people will interact with the building objectives can be met, and validate the economic and and each other, the functions to be accommodated, environmental impacts of the many choices presented. their space needs, relationships to one another, and • The Technical Program de nes how the building will other characteristics needed to support optimum come together as an integrated assembly of systems, functionality, durability, and spirit. We design with an how these systems will be built, and what they will understanding of what people will do and how the cost. It lays out code issues, the characteristics and building should function; what synergies are possible capacities of mechanical systems, electrical power through adjacencies; how much space each activity and lighting systems, structural systems, data and needs; how each space should be appointed; and communications infrastructure, acoustical and audio- prioritization of nancial investments to align with visual requirements, and other engineered infrastructure institutional objectives in light of the project’s speci c that will be needed to support the Human Program and technical and site situation. We also look at the social address the environmental and energy ef ciency goals. and economic effects of the building’s grossing factor, We de ne what is essential to build affordable, high the ratio of net space to built space, and balancing performance, exible, functional, and durable facilities spatial ef ciency with the need for informal social that respond to site, the human program’s speci c spaces essential to a lively and interactive place. circumstances, and the Town’s long-range planning • The Environmental Program identi es and explores goals. Our integrated approach to addressing all issues the complete range of options available to meet the simultaneously can often yield economies that would sustainable design and construction goals for the not otherwise be apparent. project, with the objective of de ning a strategy for achieving the highest level possible within the project
Newport Beach Civic Center | Programming Diagram
85 Simultaneously addressing each of these considerations in excellence. In early phases of Newport’s Civic Center a parallel process allows each of the categories to inform and design of the new City Hall, Bohlin Cywinski Jackson the others. This non-linear thinking is an excellent way to and EinwillerKuehl (while at PWP) conducted extensive ensure the project is considered from multiple angles and community review meetings to involve the public in the all participants’ creative intelligence is enlisted to bring the design process. Balancing the many views and concerns most promising ideas to the fore. of multiple constituencies for such a major public building was an ongoing task and one in which we placed great After analyzing the site and developing programmatic importance. We met regularly with city of cials and the requirements, the design team will generate several initial management team to make public and staff design conceptual designs for public review. We would approach presentations at every phase. We gathered comments public presentations in a similar manner to the scope of and observations from many groups, balancing these work plan with the goal of structuring a process that invites within the project’s goals, space program, and budget. participation while remaining ef cient and forward moving. Many of the City Hall’s spaces re ect the public’s desire for an open, gracious, and transparent city government Our experience in developing missions, scopes of work, and facility. Flexibility, sustainability, and the embodiment of completing projects with multiple stakeholders and diverse its Southern California maritime location were other key groups of users and constituents is long and extensive. We elements the community wanted in the new facility. enjoy working in an open and public process. Through these kinds of discussions with staff, residents, For example, Newport Beach is a city known for its CCAC, and mack5, the design team will narrow to two dedication to public process and scal responsibility. design schemes for focused feasibility, schedule, and Design development review for the new Newport Beach budget review. The design team will submit the most Civic Center and Park effectively illustrates Bohlin preferred scheme for of cial approval and advancement to Cywinski Jackson’s ability to work with diverse public the Schematic Design Phase. agencies and community groups to achieve architectural
Dry Creek Outbuildings | Northern California
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 86 SCHEMATIC DESIGN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson customarily begins schematic Design development will begin upon authorization by the design as a natural outgrowth of the concept and master Town Council. Building systems specifics and architectural planning process. Because we evaluate building systems details begin during this phase. to a greater extent during early design than traditionally occurs in the architectural design process, we will have In our preferred method of working, many of the evaluations already begun testing with you the options available and expected during design development begin much earlier, begin the iterative refinement of your selected design such as the effects of equipment on load calculations solution. We will also consider civil, landscape, and and lifecycle performance expectations. We will begin hardscape. During contract negotiations, we would researching materials and specified componentry, as well propose to further refine the detailed scope of work as materials palettes. During design development, we will outlined in the RFP in conjunction with the schedule to test in earnest how the interior fit-out integrates with the ensure alignment of mutual expectations for what will building core and shell. Mockups of architectural and/or occur during subsequent phases. We will produce a 60% interior details may begin in design development. Architectural and Landscape plan for official review and commentary from the Project Team. We will work with you Our practice transitioned to BIM in 2007 and uses to develop effective output documents to best serve and Revit software for production of contract documents. clarify development, and prepare appropriate milestones We require our consulting engineers to utilize BIM for and deliverables for your review and approval. systems coordination and constructability reviews with our contractors. We see design visualization, energy modeling, daylight analysis, and systems clash detection as major benefits of using BIM and a means to streamline the construction and fabrication process of building. While Revit is a robust program for the development of design, we also recognize it is not easily understood by those unfamiliar with the program; we work with clients to deliver electronic versions of documents that are easily read and accessible.
87 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
We believe the Construction Administration phase begins Complementary to good documentation is the Architect’s during design; a well-crafted set of contract documents is active participation and responsiveness during the a key component to completing project construction on construction phase of the project. Bohlin Cywinski Jackson time and on budget, and with high quality detailing that and all members of our design team believe in establishing extraordinary architecture demands. close working relationships with Construction Managers, Trade Contractors, material manufacturers and suppliers, Construction documentation will begin upon authorization personnel preparing shop drawings and submittals, and by the Project Team. We will structure this phase to include others involved in the construction process to form a true key milestone deliverables and reviews at 50% and 90% integrated team that works together in pursuit of quality construction documentation. As part of this process, and ef ciency. We seek to maintain a leadership role in architectural details, materials, and systems are reviewed achieving greatness in both the nished project and the regularly and adjusted; our project managers maintain a processes used to build it. We have developed approaches rolling track record of cost changes to check against cost that maximize direct personal communication while estimator documentation. maintaining necessary written project protocols, and have collaborated on innovative approaches to project delivery BIDDING that have achieved extraordinary results. We bring an enthusiasm that promotes pride in the project and builds Bohlin Cywinski Jackson will work with the Project friendships. Our approach to Construction Administration Team to evaluate bids received and answer questions, is one of the key reasons why our projects are known for compiling those questions for future reference by you and their constructability, craftsmanship, quality, and on-time prospective bidders. If needed, addenda will be issued. We delivery. look forward to participating in contractor selection; prior to these interviews and under your direction, we will assist with the development of the selection process.
Existing Atherton Library
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 88 HOURS MATRIX
Hours for Atherton Civic Center Project Base Project
Weeks 3 11 13 15 22 7 84 Masterplan Conceptual Schematic Design Construction Construction Review + Bidding Design Design Development Documents Administration Programming Hours Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Totals
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Principal 72 220 208 168 176 28 336 1,208 Senior Associate 96 440 520 600 880 280 1176 3,992 Associate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Staff 1 96 440 520 600 880 280 2688 5,504 Staff 2 0 0 260 600 1320 0 0 2,180 Staff 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Office 6 22 26 120 176 56 672 1,078
Total Architectural Hours 13,962
Einwiller Kuehl Principal 54 77 93 126 100 4 48 502 Designer 56 156 250 348 524 6 150 1,490 Research/Admin 3 2 4 1 4 2 0 16
Total Landscape Architecture Hours 2,008
Sherwood Engineers Principal 6 6 8 12 8 4 44 Senior Engineer/Designer 2 8 12 22 40 4 20 108 Project Manager 18 16 24 42 56 4 32 192 Designer I 16 32 55 150 180 14 115 562 Designer II 12 24 60 180 270 140 686 CAD/Graphics 10 54 100 140 18 322 Project Assistant 4 4 8 12 16 20 64
Total Civi Engineering Hours 1,978
Rutherford + Chekene Principal 26 48 49 20 57 3 31 234 Senior Engineer 35 81 133 108 311 28 166 862 Design Engineer 82 101 289 232 704 CADD/Revit Specialist 20 82 67 193 4 26 392
Total Structural Engineering Hours 2,192
Integral Group Principal 4 9 12 15 3 26 69 Project Manager 22.50 64 74.50 137.50 175 10 195 679 Project Engineer 4 18 52 148 177 5 170 574 BIM Designer 4 36 54 127 65 286
T-24 Design Review 1 3 14 25 12 0 0 55 T-24 Commissioning 260 260
Total MEP and Sustainability Hours 1,923
Niteo Principal 10 12 21 45 18 15 30 151 Designer 12 10 18 35 12 0 15 102 Clerical 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 45
Total Lighting Design Hours 298
Charles Salter Associates President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director 4 6 2 6 6 24 Principal Consultant - Senior Consultant - Consultant 8 18 40 40 28 134 Technical Assistant 2 2 1 5
Total Acoustic Consulting Hours 163
President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director - Principal Consultant 8 15 16 20 6 8 73 Senior Consultant 2 6 16 20 2 16 62 Consultant - Technical Assistant -
Total Audiovisual Consulting Hours 135
The Fire Consultants Principal 8 20 17 14 59
Total Code/Fire Safety Consulting Hours 59
Watry Design Principal Architect 10 10 8 4 4 1 4 41 Principal Structural 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 25 Senior Project Manager - Asst. Project Manager 16 4 20 Staff Designer - Job Captain - Administrative -
Tota Parking /Garage Hours 86
Oppenheim Lewis Principal 24 70 60 72 88 12 326 Cost Consultant 12 10 20 24 66 Clerical 4 8 6 12 12 42
Total Cost Estimating Hours 434
SGH Senior Principal 4 10 5 19 Principal 3 3 Senior Project Manager 22 21 4 26 73 Sr. Staff I Engineer 10 10 Staff II Engineer 32 30 5 77 144
Total Waterproofing Consulting Hours 249
The Preview Group Principal 8 12 20 8 8 6 12 74
Total Accessibility Consulting Hours 74
Jay Farbstein & Associates Principal Programmer 16 8 8 5 8 45 Senior Programmer 32 16 12 5 10 75 Programmer 16 8 4 28 Technical/Clerical 6 4 10
Total Police Station Programming Hours 158
Security Consultant (TBD) Principal 3 3 10 20 40 2 45 123
Security Consultanting Fees 123 Total Hours 23,842
Hours for Atherton Civic Center Project Base Project
Weeks 3 11 13 15 22 7 84 Masterplan Conceptual Schematic Design Construction Construction Review + Bidding Design Design Development Documents Administration Programming Hours Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Totals
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Principal 72 220 208 168 176 28 336 1,208 Senior Associate 96 440 520 600 880 280 1176 3,992 Associate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Staff 1 96 440 520 600 880 280 2688 5,504 Staff 2 0 0 260 600 1320 0 0 2,180 Staff 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Office 6 22 26 120 176 56 672 1,078
Total Architectural Hours 13,962
Einwiller Kuehl Principal 54 77 93 126 100 4 48 502 Designer 56 156 250 348 524 6 150 1,490 Research/Admin 3 2 4 1 4 2 0 16
Total Landscape Architecture Hours 2,008
Sherwood Engineers Principal 6 6 8 12 8 4 44 Senior Engineer/Designer 2 8 12 22 40 4 20 108 Project Manager 18 16 24 42 56 4 32 192 Designer I 16 32 55 150 180 14 115 562 Designer II 12 24 60 180 270 140 686 CAD/Graphics 10 54 100 140 18 322 Project Assistant 4 4 8 12 16 20 64
Total Civi Engineering Hours 1,978
Rutherford + Chekene Principal 26 48 49 20 57 3 31 234 Senior Engineer 35 81 133 108 311 28 166 862 Design Engineer 82 101 289 232 704 CADD/Revit Specialist 20 82 67 193 4 26 392
Total Structural Engineering Hours 2,192
Integral Group Principal 4 9 12 15 3 26 69 Project Manager 22.50 64 74.50 137.50 175 10 195 679 Project Engineer 4 18 52 148 177 5 170 574 Hours for Atherton Civic Center Project BIMHours Designer for Atherton Civic Center Project4 36 54 127 65 286 T-24 Design Review 1 3 14 25 12 0 0 55 Base Project T-24Base Commissioning Project 260 260 Total MEP and Sustainability Hours 1,923 Weeks 3 11 13 15 22 7 84 Weeks 3 11 13 15 22 7 84 Masterplan Niteo Masterplan Conceptual Schematic Design Construction Construction Conceptual Schematic Design Construction Construction Review + Bidding Principal Review + 10 12 21 45 18 Bidding15 30 151 Design Design Development Documents Administration Design Design Development Documents Administration Programming Designer Programming12 10 18 35 12 0 15 102 Clerical 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 45 Hours Hours Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Totals Total Lighting Design Hours Totals 298
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson BohlinCharles Cywinski Salter Associates Jackson Principal 72 220 208 168 176 28 336 1,208 PrincipalPresident/ Sr. VP 72 220 208 168 176 28 336 1,208 - Senior Associate 96 440 520 600 880 280 1176 3,992 SeniorVP/Director Associate 96 4404 5206 6002 8806 280 11766 3,992 24 Associate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - AssociatePrincipal Consultant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Staff 1 96 440 520 600 880 280 2688 5,504 StaffSenior 1 Consultant 96 440 520 600 880 280 2688 5,504 - Staff 2 0 0 260 600 1320 0 0 2,180 StaffConsultant 2 0 08 26018 60040 132040 0 280 2,180 134 Staff 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - StaffTechnical 3 Assistant 0 0 02 02 01 0 0 5 - Office 6 22 26 120 176 56 672 1,078 Office 6 22 26 120 176 56 672 1,078 Total Acoustic Consulting Hours 163 Total Architectural Hours 13,962 Total Architectural Hours 13,962 President/ Sr. VP - Einwiller Kuehl VP/DirectorEinwiller Kuehl - Principal 54 77 93 126 100 4 48 502 Principal Consultant 54 778 9315 12616 10020 46 488 502 73 Designer 56 156 250 348 524 6 150 1,490 DesignerSenior Consultant 56 1562 2506 34816 52420 62 15016 1,490 62 Research/Admin 3 2 4 1 4 2 0 16 Research/AdminConsultant 3 2 4 1 4 2 0 16 - Technical Assistant - Total Landscape Architecture Hours 2,008 Total Landscape Architecture Hours 2,008 Total Audiovisual Consulting Hours 135 Sherwood Engineers Sherwood Engineers Principal 6 6 8 12 8 4 44 PrincipalThe Fire Consultants 6 6 8 12 8 4 44 Senior Engineer/Designer 2 8 12 22 40 4 20 108 SeniorPrincipal Engineer/Designer 2 8 1220 2217 4014 4 20 108 59 Project Manager 18 16 24 42 56 4 32 192 Project Manager 18 16 24 42 56 4 32 192 Designer I 16 32 55 150 180 14 115 562 DesignerTotal Code/Fire I Safety Consulting Hours 16 32 55 150 180 14 115 562 59 Designer II 12 24 60 180 270 140 686 Designer II 12 24 60 180 270 140 686 CAD/Graphics 10 54 100 140 18 322 CAD/GraphicsWatry Design 10 54 100 140 18 322 Project Assistant 4 4 8 12 16 20 64 ProjectPrincipal Assistant Architect 104 104 8 124 164 1 204 64 41 Principal Structural 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 25 Total Civi Engineering Hours 1,978 TotalSenior Civi Project Engineering Manager Hours 1,978 - Asst. Project Manager 16 4 20 Rutherford + Chekene StaffRutherford Designer + Chekene - Principal 26 48 49 20 57 3 31 234 PrincipalJob Captain 26 48 49 20 57 3 31 234 - Senior Engineer 35 81 133 108 311 28 166 862 SeniorAdministrative Engineer 35 81 133 108 311 28 166 862 - Design Engineer 82 101 289 232 704 Design Engineer 82 101 289 232 704 CADD/Revit Specialist 20 82 67 193 4 26 392 CADD/RevitTota Parking Specialist /Garage Hours 20 82 67 193 4 26 392 86
Total Structural Engineering Hours 2,192 TotalOppenheim Structural Engineering Lewis Hours 2,192 Principal 24 70 60 72 88 12 326 Integral Group CostIntegral Consultant Group 12 10 20 24 66 Principal 4 9 12 15 3 26 69 PrincipalClerical 4 8 96 12 1512 3 26 69 42 Project Manager 22.50 64 74.50 137.50 175 10 195 679 Project Manager 22.50 64 74.50 137.50 175 10 195 679 Project Engineer 4 18 52 148 177 5 170 574 ProjectTotal Cost Engineer Estimating Hours 4 18 52 148 177 5 170 574 434 BIM Designer 4 36 54 127 65 286 BIM Designer 4 36 54 127 65 286 SGH T-24 Design Review 1 3 14 25 12 0 0 55 T-24Senior Design Principal Review 1 3 14 254 1210 0 05 55 19 T-24 Commissioning 260 260 T-24Principal Commissioning 3 260 260 3 Senior Project Manager 22 21 4 26 73 Total MEP and Sustainability Hours 1,923 TotalSr. Staff MEP I Engineer and Sustainability Hours 10 1,923 10 Staff II Engineer 32 30 5 77 144 Niteo Niteo Principal 10 12 21 45 18 15 30 151 PrincipalTotal Waterproofing Consulting Hours 10 12 21 45 18 15 30 151 249 Designer 12 10 18 35 12 0 15 102 Designer 12 10 18 35 12 0 15 102 Clerical 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 45 ClericalThe Preview Group 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 45 Principal 8 12 20 8 8 6 12 74 Total Lighting Design Hours 298 Total Lighting Design Hours 298 Total Accessibility Consulting Hours 74 Charles Salter Associates Charles Salter Associates President/ Sr. VP - President/Jay Farbstein Sr. VP & Associates - VP/Director 4 6 2 6 6 24 VP/DirectorPrincipal Programmer 16 48 68 25 6 68 24 45 Principal Consultant - PrincipalSenior Programmer Consultant 32 16 12 5 10 75 - Senior Consultant - SeniorProgrammer Consultant 16 8 4 28 - Consultant 8 18 40 40 28 134 ConsultantTechnical/Clerical 6 8 18 40 40 284 134 10 Technical Assistant 2 2 1 5 Technical Assistant 2 2 1 5 Total Police Station Programming Hours 158 Total Acoustic Consulting Hours 163 Total Acoustic Consulting Hours 163
President/ Sr. VP - President/Security Sr. Consultant VP (TBD) - VP/Director - VP/DirectorPrincipal 3 3 10 20 40 2 45 123 - Principal Consultant 8 15 16 20 6 8 73 Principal Consultant 8 15 16 20 6 8 73 Senior Consultant 2 6 16 20 2 16 62 SeniorSecurity Consultant Consultanting Fees 2 6 16 20 2 16 123 62 Consultant - Consultant - Technical Assistant - TechnicalTotal Hours Assistant 23,842 -
Total Audiovisual Consulting Hours 135 Total Audiovisual Consulting Hours 135
The Fire Consultants The Fire Consultants Principal 8 20 17 14 59 Principal 8 20 17 14 59
Total Code/Fire Safety Consulting Hours 59 Total Code/Fire Safety Consulting Hours 59
Watry Design Watry Design Principal Architect 10 10 8 4 4 1 4 41 Principal Architect 10 10 8 4 4 1 4 41 Principal Structural 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 25 Principal Structural 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 25 Senior Project Manager - Senior Project Manager - Asst. Project Manager 16 4 20 Asst. Project Manager 16 4 20 Staff Designer - Staff Designer - Job Captain - Job Captain - Administrative - Administrative -
Tota Parking /Garage Hours 86 Tota Parking /Garage Hours 86
Oppenheim Lewis Oppenheim Lewis Principal 24 70 60 72 88 12 326 Principal 24 70 60 72 88 12 326 Cost Consultant 12 10 20 24 66 Cost Consultant 12 10 20 24 66 Clerical 4 8 6 12 12 42 Clerical 4 8 6 12 12 42
Total Cost Estimating Hours 434 Total Cost Estimating Hours 434
SGH SGH Senior Principal 4 10 5 19 Senior Principal 4 10 5 19 Principal 3 3 Principal 3 3 Senior Project Manager 22 21 4 26 73 Senior Project Manager 22 21 4 26 73 Sr. Staff I Engineer 10 10 Sr. Staff I Engineer 10 10 Staff II Engineer 32 30 5 77 144 Staff II Engineer 32 30 5 77 144
Total Waterproofing Consulting Hours 249 Total Waterproofing Consulting Hours 249
The Preview Group The Preview Group Principal 8 12 20 8 8 6 12 74 Principal 8 12 20 8 8 6 12 74
Total Accessibility Consulting Hours 74 Total Accessibility Consulting Hours 74
Jay Farbstein & Associates Jay Farbstein & Associates Principal Programmer 16 8 8 5 8 45 Principal Programmer 16 8 8 5 8 45 Senior Programmer 32 16 12 5 10 75 Senior Programmer 32 16 12 5 10 75 Programmer 16 8 4 28 Programmer 16 8 4 28 Technical/Clerical 6 4 10 Technical/Clerical 6 4 10
Total Police Station Programming Hours 158 Total Police Station Programming Hours 158
Security Consultant (TBD) Security Consultant (TBD) Principal 3 3 10 20 40 2 45 123 Principal 3 3 10 20 40 2 45 123
Security Consultanting Fees 123 Security Consultanting Fees 123 Total Hours 23,842 Total Hours 23,842
Atherton Civic Center Project Add Alt 1 - Garage
Weeks 15 22 7 84 Design Construction Bidding Construction Development Documents Administration
Hours Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Totals
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Principal 10 10 1 10 31 Senior Associate 30 50 2 80 162 Associate - Staff 1 140 120 3 120 383 Staff 2 280 440 10 400 1,130 Staff 3 - Office 20 40 20 120 200
Total Architectural Hours 1,906
Einwiller Kuehl Principal 15 11 2 19 47 Designer 40 77 2 30 149 Research/Admin -
Total Landscape Architecture Hours 196
Sherwood Engineers Principal 2 2 4 Senior Engineer/Designer 8 12 4 24 Project Manager 4 6 4 14 Designer I 24 32 12 68 Designer II 28 42 24 94 CAD/Graphics 16 30 46 Project Assistant 4 4 4 12
Total Civi Engineering Hours 262
Rutherford + Chekene Principal 11 33 2 18 63 Senior Engineer 62 178 17 95 351 Design Engineer 58 165 132 355 CADD/Revit Specialist 38 110 3 15 166
Total Structural Engineering Hours 935
Integral Group Principal 2 4 3 9 Project Manager 10 15 1 15 41 Project Engineer 2 3 3 8 BIM Designer 8 12 8 28
Total MEP and Sustainability Hours 86
Niteo Principal 8 8 4 8 28 Designer 10 10 8 28 Clerical 2 5 2 8 17
Total Lighting Design Hours 73
Charles Salter Associates President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director - Principal Consultant - Senior Consultant - Consultant - Technical Assistant -
Total Acoustic Consulting Hours -
President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director - Principal Consultant - Senior Consultant - Consultant - Technical Assistant -
Total Audiovisual Consulting Hours -
The Fire Consultants Principal 6 6 12
Total Code/Fire Safety Consulting Hours 12
Watry Design Principal 12 12 6 10 40 Associate Principal 12 12 16 10 50 Associate - Senior Engineer 20 20 10 50 Engineers 20 12 32 Graduate Engineer 40 12 52 Senior Drafter -
Tota Parking /Garage Hours 224
Oppenheim Lewis Principal 45 55 4 104 Cost Consultant - Clerical 5 5 10
Total Cost Estimating Hours 114
SGH Senior Principal 2 4 1 4 11 Principal - Senior Project Manager 6 12 3 16 37 Sr. Staff I Engineer - Staff II Engineer 12 24 2 50 88
Total Waterproofing Consulting Hours 136
The Preview Group Principal 12 8 4 6 30
Total Accessibility Consulting Hours 30
Jay Farbstein & Associates Principal Programmer - Senior Programmer 6 8 14 Programmer - Technical/Clerical -
Total Police Station Programming Hours 14
Security Consultant (TBD) Principal 6 12 3 15 36
Security Consultanting Fees 36
Total Hours 4,024
Atherton Civic Center Project Add Alt 1 - Garage
Weeks 15 22 7 84 Design Construction Bidding Construction Development Documents Administration
Hours Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Totals
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Principal 10 10 1 10 31 Senior Associate 30 50 2 80 162 Associate - Staff 1 140 120 3 120 383 Staff 2 280 440 10 400 1,130 Staff 3 - Office 20 40 20 120 200
Total Architectural Hours 1,906
Einwiller Kuehl Principal 15 11 2 19 47 Designer 40 77 2 30 149 Research/Admin -
Total Landscape Architecture Hours 196
Sherwood Engineers Principal 2 2 4 Senior Engineer/Designer 8 12 4 24 Project Manager 4 6 4 14 Designer I 24 32 12 68 Designer II 28 42 24 94 CAD/Graphics 16 30 46 Project Assistant 4 4 4 12
Total Civi Engineering Hours 262
Rutherford + Chekene Principal 11 33 2 18 63 Senior Engineer 62 178 17 95 351 Design Engineer 58 165 132 355 CADD/Revit Specialist 38 110 3 15 166
Total Structural Engineering Hours 935
Integral Group Principal 2 4 3 9 Project Manager 10 15 1 15 41 Project Engineer 2 3 3 8 BIM Designer 8 12 8 28
Total MEP and Sustainability Hours 86
Niteo Principal 8 8 4 8 28 Designer 10 10 8 28 ClericalAtherton Civic Center Project2 5 2 8 17 TotalAdd Lighting Alt Design 1 -Hours Garage 73 Charles Salter Associates President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director Weeks 15 22 7 84 - Principal Consultant - Design Construction Bidding Construction Senior Consultant - Development Documents Administration Consultant - Technical Assistant - Hours Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Totals Total Acoustic Consulting Hours - Bohlin Cywinski Jackson President/Principal Sr. VP 10 10 1 10 31 - VP/DirectorSenior Associate 30 50 2 80 162 - PrincipalAssociate Consultant - SeniorStaff 1 Consultant 140 120 3 120 383 - ConsultantStaff 2 280 440 10 400 1,130 - TechnicalStaff 3 Assistant - Office 20 40 20 120 200 Total Audiovisual Consulting Hours - Total Architectural Hours 1,906 The Fire Consultants PrincipalEinwiller Kuehl 6 6 12 Principal 15 11 2 19 47 DesignerTotal Code/Fire Safety Consulting Hours 40 77 2 30 149 12 Research/Admin - Watry Design PrincipalTotal Landscape Architecture Hours 12 12 6 10 196 40 Associate Principal 12 12 16 10 50 AssociateSherwood Engineers - PrincipalSenior Engineer 202 202 10 50 4 SeniorEngineers Engineer/Designer 208 12 4 32 24 ProjectGraduate Manager Engineer 404 126 4 14 52 DesignerSenior Drafter I 24 32 12 68 - Designer II 28 42 24 94 CAD/GraphicsTota Parking /Garage Hours 16 30 224 46 Project Assistant 4 4 4 12 Oppenheim Lewis PrincipalTotal Civi Engineering Hours 45 55 4 104 262 Cost Consultant - ClericalRutherford + Chekene 5 5 10 Principal 11 33 2 18 63 SeniorTotal Cost Engineer Estimating Hours 62 178 17 95 351 114 Design Engineer 58 165 132 355 CADD/RevitSGH Specialist 38 110 3 15 166 Senior Principal 2 4 1 4 11 PrincipalTotal Structural Engineering Hours 935 - Senior Project Manager 6 12 3 16 37 Sr.Integral Staff I Engineer Group - PrincipalStaff II Engineer 122 244 2 503 88 9 Project Manager 10 15 1 15 41 ProjectTotal Waterproofing Engineer Consulting Hours 2 3 3 136 8 BIM Designer 8 12 8 28
TotalThe MEPPreview and Sustainability Group Hours 86 Principal 12 8 4 6 30 Niteo PrincipalTotal Accessibility Consulting Hours 8 8 4 8 28 30 Designer 10 10 8 28 ClericalJay Farbstein & Associates 2 5 2 8 17 Principal Programmer - SeniorTotal Lighting Programmer Design Hours 6 8 14 73 Programmer - Technical/ClericalCharles Salter Associates - President/ Sr. VP - VP/DirectorTotal Police Station Programming Hours 14 - Principal Consultant - SeniorSecurity Consultant Consultant (TBD) - PrincipalConsultant 6 12 3 15 36 - Technical Assistant - Security Consultanting Fees 36 Total Acoustic Consulting Hours - Total Hours 4,024 President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director - Principal Consultant - Senior Consultant - Consultant - Technical Assistant -
Total Audiovisual Consulting Hours -
The Fire Consultants Principal 6 6 12
Total Code/Fire Safety Consulting Hours 12
Watry Design Principal 12 12 6 10 40 Associate Principal 12 12 16 10 50 Associate - Senior Engineer 20 20 10 50 Engineers 20 12 32 Graduate Engineer 40 12 52 Senior Drafter -
Tota Parking /Garage Hours 224
Oppenheim Lewis Principal 45 55 4 104 Cost Consultant - Clerical 5 5 10
Total Cost Estimating Hours 114
SGH Senior Principal 2 4 1 4 11 Principal - Senior Project Manager 6 12 3 16 37 Sr. Staff I Engineer - Staff II Engineer 12 24 2 50 88
Total Waterproofing Consulting Hours 136
The Preview Group Principal 12 8 4 6 30
Total Accessibility Consulting Hours 30
Jay Farbstein & Associates Principal Programmer - Senior Programmer 6 8 14 Programmer - Technical/Clerical -
Total Police Station Programming Hours 14
Security Consultant (TBD) Principal 6 12 3 15 36
Security Consultanting Fees 36
Total Hours 4,024
Atherton Civic Center Project Add Alt 2 - Sustainability
weeks 15 22 7 84 Design Construction Bidding Construction Development Documents Administration
Hours Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Totals
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Principal 8 8 1 10 27 Senior Associate 20 30 1 20 71 Associate - Staff 1 40 60 2 80 182 Staff 2 40 80 60 180 Staff 3 - Office 2 3 2 5 12
Total Architectural Hours 472
Einwiller Kuehl Principal 25 11 2 19 57 Designer 40 77 2 30 149 Research/Admin -
Total Landscape Architecture Hours 206
Sherwood Engineers Principal 4 4 2 10 Senior Engineer/Designer 12 12 12 36 Project Manager 8 6 4 4 22 Designer I 30 60 8 42 140 Designer II 60 120 12 192 CAD/Graphics 24 50 74 Project Assistant 4 4 2 8 18
Total Civi Engineering Hours 492
Rutherford + Chekene Principal 1 3 0 2 6 Senior Engineer 6 17 2 9 33 Design Engineer 5 15 12 33 CADD/Revit Specialist 4 10 0 1 16
Total Structural Engineering Hours 87
Integral Group Principal 4 8 6 18 Project Manager 20 30 2 26 78 Project Engineer 5 12 8 25 BIM Designer 16 24 18 58
Total MEP Hours 179
Principal 16 10 1 5 32 Project Manager 40 60 5 40 145 Project Engineer 18 25 1 20 64 BIM Designer 30 60 40 130
Total Sustainable Consulting Hours 371
Niteo Principal 20 5 2 15 42 Designer 6 6 2 14 Clerical 2 5 2 8 17
Total Lighting Design Hours 73
Charles Salter Associates President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director - Principal Consultant - Senior Consultant - Consultant - Technical Assistant -
Total Acoustic Consulting Hours -
President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director - Principal Consultant - Senior Consultant - Consultant - Technical Assistant -
Total Audiovisual Consulting Hours -
The Fire Consultants Principal -
Total Code/Fire Safety Consulting Hours -
Watry Design Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total Parking /Garage Hours -
Oppenheim Lewis Principal 16 16 4 36 Cost Consultant 8 8 16 Clerical 2 2 4
Total Cost Estimating Hours 56
SGH Senior Principal 2 2 1 2 7 Principal - Senior Project Manager 3 6 3 8 20 Sr. Staff I Engineer - Sr. Staff II Engineer 6 12 1 30 49
Total Waterproofing Consulting Hours 76
The Preview Group Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total Accessibility Consulting Hours -
Jay Farbstein & Associates Principal Programmer - Senior Programmer - Programmer - Technical/Clerical -
Total Police Station Programming Hours -
Security Consultant (TBD) Principal -
Total Security Consulting Hours -
Total Hours 2,012
Atherton Civic Center Project Add Alt 2 - Sustainability
weeks 15 22 7 84 Design Construction Bidding Construction Development Documents Administration
Hours Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Totals
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Principal 8 8 1 10 27 Senior Associate 20 30 1 20 71 Associate - Staff 1 40 60 2 80 182 Staff 2 40 80 60 180 Staff 3 - Office 2 3 2 5 12
Total Architectural Hours 472
Einwiller Kuehl Principal 25 11 2 19 57 Designer 40 77 2 30 149 Research/Admin -
Total Landscape Architecture Hours 206
Sherwood Engineers Principal 4 4 2 10 Senior Engineer/Designer 12 12 12 36 Project Manager 8 6 4 4 22 Designer I 30 60 8 42 140 Designer II 60 120 12 192 CAD/Graphics 24 50 74 Project Assistant 4 4 2 8 18
Total Civi Engineering Hours 492
Rutherford + Chekene Principal 1 3 0 2 6 Senior Engineer 6 17 2 9 33 Design Engineer 5 15 12 33 CADD/Revit Specialist 4 10 0 1 16
Total Structural Engineering Hours 87
Integral Group Principal 4 8 6 18 Project Manager 20 30 2 26 78 Project Engineer 5 12 8 25 BIM Designer 16 24 18 58
Total MEP Hours 179
Principal 16 10 1 5 32 Project Manager 40 60 5 40 145 Project Engineer 18 25 1 20 64 BIM Designer 30 60 40 130
Total Sustainable Consulting Hours 371
Niteo Principal 20 5 2 15 42 Designer 6 6 2 14 Clerical 2 5 2 8 17 TotalAtherton Lighting Design Civic Hours Center Project 73
CharlesAdd Alt Salter 2 Associates - Sustainability President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director - Principal Consultant - Senior Consultant weeks 15 22 7 84 - Consultant Design Construction Bidding Construction - Technical Assistant Development Documents Administration -
Total Acoustic Consulting Hours Hours - Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Totals
President/Bohlin CywinskiSr. VP Jackson - PrincipalVP/Director 8 8 1 10 27 - SeniorPrincipal Associate Consultant 20 30 1 20 71 - AssociateSenior Consultant - StaffConsultant 1 40 60 2 80 182 - StaffTechnical 2 Assistant 40 80 60 180 - Staff 3 - OfficeTotal Audiovisual Consulting Hours 2 3 2 5 12 -
Total Architectural Hours 472 The Fire Consultants Principal - Einwiller Kuehl - - PrincipalTotal Code/Fire Safety Consulting Hours 25 11 2 19 57 Designer 40 77 2 30 149 Research/Admin - Watry Design TotalPrincipal Landscape Architecture Hours 206 - Associate Principal - Associate - SeniorSherwood Engineer Engineers - Engineers - Principal 4 4 2 10 Graduate Engineer - Senior Engineer/Designer 12 12 12 36 Senior Drafter - Project Manager 8 6 4 4 22 Drafter - Designer I 30 60 8 42 140 Clerical - Designer II 60 120 12 192 CAD/Graphics 24 50 74 - - ProjectTotal Parking Assistant /Garage Hours 4 4 2 8 18
Total Civi Engineering Hours 492 Oppenheim Lewis Principal 16 16 4 36 CostRutherford Consultant + Chekene 8 8 16 Clerical 2 2 4 Principal 1 3 0 2 6 Senior Engineer 6 17 2 9 33 DesignTotal Cost Engineer Estimating Hours 5 15 12 56 33 CADD/Revit Specialist 4 10 0 1 16
TotalSGH Structural Engineering Hours 87 Senior Principal 2 2 1 2 7 Principal - SeniorIntegral Project Group Manager 3 6 3 8 20 Sr. Staff I Engineer - Principal 4 8 6 18 Sr. Staff II Engineer 6 12 1 30 49 Project Manager 20 30 2 26 78 Project Engineer 5 12 8 25 BIMTotal Designer Waterproofing Consulting Hours 16 24 18 58 76
Total MEP Hours 179 The Preview Group Principal 16 10 1 5 32 - ProjectAssociate Manager Principal 40 60 5 40 145 - ProjectAssociate Engineer 18 25 1 20 64 - BIMSenior Designer Engineer 30 60 40 130 - Engineers - TotalGraduate Sustainable Engineer Consulting Hours 371 - Senior Drafter - Drafter - ClericalNiteo - Principal 20 5 2 15 42 - - DesignerTotal Accessibility Consulting Hours 6 6 2 14 Clerical 2 5 2 8 17
TotalJay LightingFarbstein Design & HoursAssociates 73 Principal Programmer - Senior Programmer - ProgrammerCharles Salter Associates - Technical/Clerical - President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director - - - PrincipalTotal Police Consultant Station Programming Hours - Senior Consultant - ConsultantSecurity Consultant (TBD) - TechnicalPrincipal Assistant -
Total AcousticSecurity ConsultingConsulting HoursHours - Total Hours 2,012 President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director - Principal Consultant - Senior Consultant - Consultant - Technical Assistant -
Total Audiovisual Consulting Hours -
The Fire Consultants Principal -
Total Code/Fire Safety Consulting Hours -
Watry Design Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total Parking /Garage Hours -
Oppenheim Lewis Principal 16 16 4 36 Cost Consultant 8 8 16 Clerical 2 2 4
Total Cost Estimating Hours 56
SGH Senior Principal 2 2 1 2 7 Principal - Senior Project Manager 3 6 3 8 20 Sr. Staff I Engineer - Sr. Staff II Engineer 6 12 1 30 49
Total Waterproofing Consulting Hours 76
The Preview Group Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total Accessibility Consulting Hours -
Jay Farbstein & Associates Principal Programmer - Senior Programmer - Programmer - Technical/Clerical -
Total Police Station Programming Hours -
Security Consultant (TBD) Principal -
Total Security Consulting Hours -
Total Hours 2,012
Atherton Civic Center Project Add Alt 3 - Town Hall Reno/Reuse
weeks 15 22 7 84 Design Construction Bidding Construction Development Documents Administration
Hours Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Totals
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Principal 10 10 2 10 32 Senior Associate 40 80 2 40 162 Associate - Staff 1 40 80 6 60 186 Staff 2 40 120 160 Staff 3 - Office 3 5 1 10 19
Total Architectural Hours 559
Einwiller Kuehl Partner - Associate - Landscape Architect - Staff -
Total Landscape Architecture Hours -
Sherwood Engineers Principal 2 2 4 Senior Engineer/Designer 4 4 4 12 Project Manager 4 4 2 4 14 Designer I 12 24 4 8 48 Designer II 24 42 4 16 86 CAD/Graphics 16 24 40 Project Assistant 4 4 4 12
Total Civi Engineering Hours 216
Rutherford + Chekene Principal 4 9 0 7 20 Senior Engineer 19 46 5 39 110 Design Engineer 18 43 54 115 CADD/Revit Specialist 12 29 1 6 48
Total Structural Engineering Hours 292
Integral Group Principal 2 5 3 10 Project Manager 16 18 1 15 50 Project Engineer 3 3 3 9 BIM Designer 10 10 20
Total MEP and Sustainability Hours 89
Niteo Principal 15 10 4 10 39 Designer 20 10 2 13 45 Clerical 3 3 2 8
Total Lighting Design Hours 92
Charles Salter Associates President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director - Principal Consultant - Senior Consultant 8 7 15 Consultant 8 8 16 Technical Assistant -
Total Acoustic Consulting Hours 31
President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director - Principal Consultant - Senior Consultant 8 7 15 Consultant 8 8 16 Technical Assistant -
Total Audiovisual Consulting Hours 31
The Fire Consultants Principal 10 10 20
Total Code/Fire Safety Consulting Hours 20
Watry Design Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total Parking /Garage Hours -
Oppenheim Lewis Principal 35 35 4 74 Cost Consultant 6 6 12 Clerical 5 5 10
Total Cost Estimating Hours 96
SGH Senior Principal 4 5 2 6 17 Principal - Senior Proj Manager 12 15 6 22 55 Sr. Staff I Engineer - Staff II Engineer 24 30 4 65 123
Total Waterproofing Consulting Hours 195
The Preview Group Principal 16 12 6 6 40
Total Accessibility Consulting Hours 40
Jay Farbstein & Associates Principal Programmer - Senior Programmer - Programmer - Technical/Clerical -
Total Police Station Programming Hours -
Security Consultant (TBD) Principal 4 8 2 10 24
Total Security Consulting Hours 24
Total Hours 1,685
Atherton Civic Center Project Add Alt 3 - Town Hall Reno/Reuse
weeks 15 22 7 84 Design Construction Bidding Construction Development Documents Administration
Hours Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Totals
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Principal 10 10 2 10 32 Senior Associate 40 80 2 40 162 Associate - Staff 1 40 80 6 60 186 Staff 2 40 120 160 Staff 3 - Office 3 5 1 10 19
Total Architectural Hours 559
Einwiller Kuehl Partner - Associate - Landscape Architect - Staff -
Total Landscape Architecture Hours -
Sherwood Engineers Principal 2 2 4 Senior Engineer/Designer 4 4 4 12 Project Manager 4 4 2 4 14 Designer I 12 24 4 8 48 Designer II 24 42 4 16 86 CAD/Graphics 16 24 40 Project Assistant 4 4 4 12
Total Civi Engineering Hours 216
Rutherford + Chekene Principal 4 9 0 7 20 Senior Engineer 19 46 5 39 110 Design Engineer 18 43 54 115 CADD/Revit Specialist 12 29 1 6 48
Total Structural Engineering Hours 292
Integral Group Principal 2 5 3 10 Project Manager 16 18 1 15 50 Project Engineer 3 3 3 9 BIM Designer 10 10 20
Total MEP and Sustainability Hours 89
Niteo Principal 15 10 4 10 39 Designer 20 10 2 13 45 Clerical 3 3 2 8 TotalAtherton Lighting Design Civic Hours Center Project 92
CharlesAdd Alt Salter 3 Associates - Town Hall Reno/Reuse President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director - Principal Consultant weeks 15 22 7 84 - Senior Consultant 8 7 15 Design Construction Bidding Construction Consultant 8 8 16 Development Documents Administration Technical Assistant - Hours Total Acoustic Consulting Hours 31 Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Totals
President/Bohlin CywinskiSr. VP Jackson - VP/DirectorPrincipal 10 10 2 10 32 - PrincipalSenior Associate Consultant 40 80 2 40 162 - SeniorAssociate Consultant 8 7 15 - ConsultantStaff 1 408 808 6 60 186 16 TechnicalStaff 2 Assistant 40 120 160 - Staff 3 - TotalOffice Audiovisual Consulting Hours 3 5 1 10 19 31
Total Architectural Hours 559 The Fire Consultants Principal 10 10 20 Einwiller Kuehl PartnerTotal Code/Fire Safety Consulting Hours 20 - Associate - Landscape Architect - StaffWatry Design - Principal - AssociateTotal Landscape Principal Architecture Hours - Associate - Senior Engineer - EngineersSherwood Engineers - PrincipalGraduate Engineer 2 2 4 - Senior Engineer/DesignerDrafter 4 4 4 12 - ProjectDrafter Manager 4 4 2 4 14 - DesignerClerical I 12 24 4 8 48 - Designer II 24 42 4 16 86 CAD/GraphicsTotal Parking /Garage Hours 16 24 40 - Project Assistant 4 4 4 12
TotalOppenheim Civi Engineering Lewis Hours 216 Principal 35 35 4 74 Cost Consultant 6 6 12 ClericalRutherford + Chekene 5 5 10 Principal 4 9 0 7 20 SeniorTotal Cost Engineer Estimating Hours 19 46 5 39 110 96 Design Engineer 18 43 54 115 CADD/Revit Specialist 12 29 1 6 48 SGH SeniorTotal Structural Principal Engineering Hours 4 5 2 6 292 17 Principal - Senior Proj Manager 12 15 6 22 55 Sr.Integral Staff I Engineer Group - PrincipalStaff II Engineer 242 305 4 653 123 10 Project Manager 16 18 1 15 50 ProjectTotal Waterproofing Engineer Consulting Hours 3 3 3 195 9 BIM Designer 10 10 20
TotalThe MEPPreview and Sustainability Group Hours 89 Principal 16 12 6 6 40
TotalNiteo Accessibility Consulting Hours 40 Principal 15 10 4 10 39 Designer 20 10 2 13 45 ClericalJay Farbstein & Associates 3 3 2 8 Principal Programmer - SeniorTotal Lighting Programmer Design Hours 92 - Programmer - Technical/Clerical - Charles Salter Associates President/Total Police Sr. Station VP Programming Hours - VP/Director - PrincipalSecurity Consultant Consultant (TBD) - PrincipalSenior Consultant 48 87 2 10 24 15 Consultant 8 8 16 TotalTechnical Security Assistant Consulting Hours 24 -
Total Acoustic Hours Consulting Hours 1,685 31
President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director - Principal Consultant - Senior Consultant 8 7 15 Consultant 8 8 16 Technical Assistant -
Total Audiovisual Consulting Hours 31
The Fire Consultants Principal 10 10 20
Total Code/Fire Safety Consulting Hours 20
Watry Design Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total Parking /Garage Hours -
Oppenheim Lewis Principal 35 35 4 74 Cost Consultant 6 6 12 Clerical 5 5 10
Total Cost Estimating Hours 96
SGH Senior Principal 4 5 2 6 17 Principal - Senior Proj Manager 12 15 6 22 55 Sr. Staff I Engineer - Staff II Engineer 24 30 4 65 123
Total Waterproofing Consulting Hours 195
The Preview Group Principal 16 12 6 6 40
Total Accessibility Consulting Hours 40
Jay Farbstein & Associates Principal Programmer - Senior Programmer - Programmer - Technical/Clerical -
Total Police Station Programming Hours -
Security Consultant (TBD) Principal 4 8 2 10 24
Total Security Consulting Hours 24
Total Hours 1,685
Atherton Civic Center Project Add Alt 4 - Upgraded Site Amenities
weeks 15 22 7 84 Design Construction Bidding Construction Development Documents Administration
Hours Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Totals
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Principal 3 2 5 Senior Associate 8 12 1 4 25 Associate - Staff 1 12 16 1 8 37 Staff 2 - Staff 3 - Office 1 2 3 6
Total Architectural Hours 73
Einwiller Kuehl Principal 15 11 2 19 47 Designer 40 77 2 30 149 Research/Admin -
Total Landscape Architecture Hours 196
Sherwood Engineers Principal 2 2 4 Senior Engineer/Designer 4 4 2 10 Project Manager 6 8 2 8 24 Designer I 12 18 4 12 46 Designer II 24 32 24 80 CAD/Graphics 8 24 32 Project Assistant 2 2 2 6
Total Civi Engineering Hours 202
Rutherford + Chekene Principal 1 2 0 1 4 Senior Engineer 4 11 1 6 22 Design Engineer 4 10 8 22 CADD/Revit Specialist 2 7 0 1 10
Total Structural Engineering Hours 58
Integral Group - Principal 2 3 2 7 Project Manager 8 9 1 8 26 Project Engineer 4 6 6 16 BIM Designer 3 12 10 25
Total MEP and Sustainability Hours 74
Niteo Principal 8 8 1 4 21 Designer 15 10 5 3 33 Clerical 3 3 5 11
Total Lighting Design Hours 65
Charles Salter Associates President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director - Principal Consultant - Senior Consultant - Consultant - Technical Assistant -
Total Acoustic Consulting Hours -
President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director - Principal Consultant - Senior Consultant - Consultant - Technical Assistant -
Total Audiovisual Consulting Hours -
The Fire Consultants Principal -
Total Code/Fire Safety Consulting Hours -
Watry Design Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total Parking /Garage Hours -
Oppenheim Lewis Principal 16 16 4 36 Cost Consultant 8 8 16 Clerical 2 2 4
Total Cost Estimating Hours 56
SGH Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total Waterproofing Consulting Hours -
The Preview Group Principal 6 4 4 4 18
Total Accessibility Consulting Hours 18
Jay Farbstein & Associates Principal Programmer - Senior Programmer - Programmer - Technical/Clerical -
Total Police Station Programming Hours -
Security Consultant (TBD) Principal -
Total Security Consulting Hours -
Total Hours 742
Atherton Civic Center Project Add Alt 4 - Upgraded Site Amenities
weeks 15 22 7 84 Design Construction Bidding Construction Development Documents Administration
Hours Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Totals
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Principal 3 2 5 Senior Associate 8 12 1 4 25 Associate - Staff 1 12 16 1 8 37 Staff 2 - Staff 3 - Office 1 2 3 6
Total Architectural Hours 73
Einwiller Kuehl Principal 15 11 2 19 47 Designer 40 77 2 30 149 Research/Admin -
Total Landscape Architecture Hours 196
Sherwood Engineers Principal 2 2 4 Senior Engineer/Designer 4 4 2 10 Project Manager 6 8 2 8 24 Designer I 12 18 4 12 46 Designer II 24 32 24 80 CAD/Graphics 8 24 32 Project Assistant 2 2 2 6
Total Civi Engineering Hours 202
Rutherford + Chekene Principal 1 2 0 1 4 Senior Engineer 4 11 1 6 22 Design Engineer 4 10 8 22 CADD/Revit Specialist 2 7 0 1 10
Total Structural Engineering Hours 58
Integral Group - Principal 2 3 2 7 Project Manager 8 9 1 8 26 Project Engineer 4 6 6 16 BIM Designer 3 12 10 25
Total MEP and Sustainability Hours 74
Niteo Principal 8 8 1 4 21 Designer 15 10 5 3 33 ClericalAtherton Civic Center Project3 3 5 11
TotalAdd Lighting Alt Design 4 -Hours Upgraded Site Amenities 65 Charles Salter Associates President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director weeks 15 22 7 84 - Principal Consultant Design Construction Bidding Construction - Senior Consultant Development Documents Administration - Consultant - Technical Assistant Hours - Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Totals Total Acoustic Consulting Hours -
President/Bohlin CywinskiSr. VP Jackson - Principal 3 2 5 VP/Director - Senior Associate 8 12 1 4 25 Principal Consultant - Associate - Senior Consultant - Staff 1 12 16 1 8 37 Consultant - Staff 2 - Technical Assistant - Staff 3 - Office 1 2 3 6 Total Audiovisual Consulting Hours - Total Architectural Hours 73 The Fire Consultants Principal -
TotalEinwiller Code/Fire Kuehl Safety Consulting Hours - Principal 15 11 2 19 47 DesignerWatry Design 40 77 2 30 149 Research/Admin - Principal - Associate Principal - Total Landscape Architecture Hours 196 Associate - Senior Engineer - EngineersSherwood Engineers - GraduatePrincipal Engineer 2 2 4 - Senior DrafterEngineer/Designer 4 4 2 10 - DrafterProject Manager 6 8 2 8 24 - ClericalDesigner I 12 18 4 12 46 - Designer II 24 32 24 80 TotalCAD/Graphics Parking /Garage Hours 8 24 32 - Project Assistant 2 2 2 6 Oppenheim Lewis Total Civi Engineering Hours 202 Principal 16 16 4 36 Cost Consultant 8 8 16 ClericalRutherford + Chekene 2 2 4 Principal 1 2 0 1 4 TotalSenior Cost Engineer Estimating Hours 4 11 1 6 56 22 Design Engineer 4 10 8 22 CADD/RevitSGH Specialist 2 7 0 1 10 Principal - Total Structural Engineering Hours 58 Associate Principal - Associate - SeniorIntegral Engineer Group - EngineersPrincipal 2 3 2 7 - GraduateProject Manager Engineer 8 9 1 8 26 - SeniorProject DrafterEngineer 4 6 6 16 - DrafterBIM Designer 3 12 10 25 - Clerical - Total MEP and Sustainability Hours 74 Total Waterproofing Consulting Hours - Niteo PrincipalThe Preview Group 8 8 1 4 21 PrincipalDesigner 156 104 45 43 18 33 Clerical 3 3 5 11 Total Accessibility Consulting Hours 18 Total Lighting Design Hours 65 Jay Farbstein & Associates PrincipalCharles Programmer Salter Associates - SeniorPresident/ Programmer Sr. VP - ProgrammerVP/Director - Technical/ClericalPrincipal Consultant - Senior Consultant - TotalConsultant Police Station Programming Hours - Technical Assistant - Security Consultant (TBD) Total Acoustic Consulting Hours - Principal - President/ Sr. VP - Total Security Consulting Hours - VP/Director - Principal Consultant 742 - SeniorTotal ConsultantHours - Consultant - Technical Assistant -
Total Audiovisual Consulting Hours -
The Fire Consultants Principal -
Total Code/Fire Safety Consulting Hours -
Watry Design Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total Parking /Garage Hours -
Oppenheim Lewis Principal 16 16 4 36 Cost Consultant 8 8 16 Clerical 2 2 4
Total Cost Estimating Hours 56
SGH Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total Waterproofing Consulting Hours -
The Preview Group Principal 6 4 4 4 18
Total Accessibility Consulting Hours 18
Jay Farbstein & Associates Principal Programmer - Senior Programmer - Programmer - Technical/Clerical -
Total Police Station Programming Hours -
Security Consultant (TBD) Principal -
Total Security Consulting Hours -
Total Hours 742 Atherton Civic Center Project Add Alt 5 - Add'l Ballistic Sheathing
weeks 15 22 7 84 Design Construction Bidding Construction Development Documents Administration
Hours Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Totals
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Principal 1 1 2 Senior Associate 4 4 1 9 Associate - Staff 1 6 6 1 2 15 Staff 2 - Staff 3 - Office -
Total Architectural Hours 26
Einwiller Kuehl Partner - Associate - Landscape Architect - Staff -
Total Landscape Architecture Hours -
Sherwood Engineers Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total Civi Engineering Hours -
Rutherford + Chekene Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total Structural Engineering Hours -
Integral Group Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total MEP Hours -
Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total Sustainable Consulting Hours -
Niteo Principal - Designer - Clerical -
Total Lighting Design Hours -
Charles Salter Associates President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director - Principal Consultant - Senior Consultant - Consultant - Technical Assistant -
Total Acoustic Consulting Hours -
President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director - Principal Consultant - Senior Consultant - Consultant - Technical Assistant -
Total Audiovisual Consulting Hours -
The Fire Consultants Principal -
Total Code/Fire Safety Consulting Hours -
Watry Design Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total Parking /Garage Hours -
Oppenheim Lewis Principal 4 4 8 Cost Consultant - Clerical -
Total Cost Estimating Hours 8
SGH Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total Waterproofing Consulting Hours -
The Preview Group Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total Accessibility Consulting Hours -
Jay Farbstein & Associates Principal Programmer - Senior Programmer 1 1 Programmer - Technical/Clerical -
Total Police Station Programming Hours 1
Security Consultant (TBD) Principal -
Total Security Consulting Hours -
Total Hours 35 Atherton Civic Center Project Add Alt 5 - Add'l Ballistic Sheathing
weeks 15 22 7 84 Design Construction Bidding Construction Development Documents Administration
Hours Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Totals
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Principal 1 1 2 Senior Associate 4 4 1 9 Associate - Staff 1 6 6 1 2 15 Staff 2 - Staff 3 - Office -
Total Architectural Hours 26
Einwiller Kuehl Partner - Associate - Landscape Architect - Staff -
Total Landscape Architecture Hours -
Sherwood Engineers Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total Civi Engineering Hours -
Rutherford + Chekene Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total Structural Engineering Hours -
Integral Group Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total MEP Hours -
Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total Sustainable Consulting Hours -
Niteo Principal - Designer - ClericalAtherton Civic Center Project - - - TotalAdd Lighting Alt Design 5 -Hours Add'l Ballistic Sheathing Charles Salter Associates President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director - Principal Consultant weeks 15 22 7 84 - Senior Consultant Design Construction Bidding Construction - Consultant Development Documents Administration - Technical Assistant - Hours Total Acoustic Consulting Hours Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Totals - Bohlin Cywinski Jackson PrincipalPresident/ Sr. VP 1 1 2 - SeniorVP/Director Associate 4 4 1 9 - PrincipalAssociate Consultant - SeniorStaff 1 Consultant 6 6 1 2 15 - StaffConsultant 2 - StaffTechnical 3 Assistant - Office - Total Audiovisual Consulting Hours - Total Architectural Hours 26 The Fire Consultants PrincipalEinwiller Kuehl - Partner - Total Code/Fire Safety Consulting Hours - Associate - Landscape Architect - Staff - Watry Design TotalPrincipal Landscape Architecture Hours - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - EngineersSherwood Engineers - Principal - Graduate Engineer - Associate Principal - Senior Drafter - Associate - Drafter - Senior Engineer - Clerical - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Total Parking /Garage Hours - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical - Oppenheim Lewis TotalPrincipal Civi Engineering Hours 4 4 8 - Cost Consultant - Clerical - Rutherford + Chekene Total Cost Estimating Hours 8 Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - SeniorSGH Engineer - EngineersPrincipal - GraduateAssociate EngineerPrincipal - SeniorAssociate Drafter - DrafterSenior Engineer - ClericalEngineers - Graduate Engineer - TotalSenior Structural Drafter Engineering Hours - Drafter - Clerical - Integral Group Total Waterproofing Consulting Hours - Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - SeniorThe Preview Engineer Group - EngineersPrincipal - GraduateAssociate EngineerPrincipal - SeniorAssociate Drafter - DrafterSenior Engineer - ClericalEngineers - Graduate Engineer - TotalSenior MEP Drafter Hours - Drafter - PrincipalClerical - Associate Principal - AssociateTotal Accessibility Consulting Hours - Senior Engineer - Engineers - GraduateJay Farbstein Engineer & Associates - PrincipalSenior Drafter Programmer - SeniorDrafter Programmer 1 1 - ProgrammerClerical - Technical/Clerical - Total Sustainable Consulting Hours - Total Police Station Programming Hours 1
SecurityNiteo Consultant (TBD) Principal - Designer - TotalClerical Security Consulting Hours -
Total Lighting Hours Design Hours 35 -
Charles Salter Associates President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director - Principal Consultant - Senior Consultant - Consultant - Technical Assistant -
Total Acoustic Consulting Hours -
President/ Sr. VP - VP/Director - Principal Consultant - Senior Consultant - Consultant - Technical Assistant -
Total Audiovisual Consulting Hours -
The Fire Consultants Principal -
Total Code/Fire Safety Consulting Hours -
Watry Design Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total Parking /Garage Hours -
Oppenheim Lewis Principal 4 4 8 Cost Consultant - Clerical -
Total Cost Estimating Hours 8
SGH Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total Waterproofing Consulting Hours -
The Preview Group Principal - Associate Principal - Associate - Senior Engineer - Engineers - Graduate Engineer - Senior Drafter - Drafter - Clerical -
Total Accessibility Consulting Hours -
Jay Farbstein & Associates Principal Programmer - Senior Programmer 1 1 Programmer - Technical/Clerical -
Total Police Station Programming Hours 1
Security Consultant (TBD) Principal -
Total Security Consulting Hours -
Total Hours 35
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 102 Digital Arts Research Center | University of California, Santa Cruz Project Schedule
KICK-OFF DESIGN PHASE CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION KICK-OFF MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING REVIEW CITY COUNCIL MEETING REVIEW CITY COUNCIL MEETING REVIEW CITY COUNCIL MEETING REVIEW CITY COUNCIL MEETING REVIEW CITY COUNCIL MEETING REVIEW MOVE IN
MASTER PLAN REVIEW & PRGRAMMING BIDDING
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
ENTITLEMENTS
PERMITTING July July July May May May April April April June June June March March March March August August August October October October February February February February November November November December December December September September September 2015 2016 2017 2018
SEE DETAILED PLAN, NEXT PAGE
103 KICK-OFF DESIGN PHASE CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION KICK-OFF MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING REVIEW CITY COUNCIL MEETING REVIEW CITY COUNCIL MEETING REVIEW CITY COUNCIL MEETING REVIEW CITY COUNCIL MEETING REVIEW CITY COUNCIL MEETING REVIEW MOVE IN
MASTER PLAN REVIEW & PRGRAMMING BIDDING
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
ENTITLEMENTS
PERMITTING July July July May May May April April April June June June March March March March August August August October October October February February February February November November November December December December September September September 2015 2016 2017 2018
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 104 Master Plan Review and Concept Design Phase
15 WEEK OVERLAPPED PHASES 1 + 2 The proposed meeting dates are comprised of 1 to 2 hour meetings extending across an entire day, or possibly two, in the early stages. They are intended for discussion, contingent upon con rmation by Project Team participants. They can be revised to accommodate individual schedules and availability once the project begins.
NOTICE TO PROCEED + BACKGROUND DOCUMENT REVIEW
1. KICK-OFF MEETING: PROJECT TEAM + DESIGN TEAM • Introductions, roles, and responsibilities • Review schedule and con rm proposed meeting dates • Review project vision and aspirational goals • Review current Master Plan and ultimate vision for site FEB 2015 • De ne project parameters, including budget, schedule, and scope • Discuss issues and insights from background provided by Project Team to Design Team; identify any additional site or utility information that may be required • Review proposed program of departments; establish a list of interviews and meetings to review program with Police, Library, and Administrative staff; start program discussions 16 about individual areas in afternoon • Initial site tour with project team and staff • Site and neighborhood tour with project team and community members 1 2 23 2. PROGRAMMATIC INTERVIEWS + TOURS • Review observations and analysis of program discussions from Meeting 1 • Discuss site circumstances, including vehicular access, circulation, parking, existing site utilities and capacities, and relationship to adjacent facilities, such as Caltrain, Holbrook MAR Palmer Park, and site program; identify site issues impacting site costs • Discuss site integration with Town of Atherton Master Plan • Meet with departmental staff to discuss and further understand program outlined in RFP
3. PROJECT + DESIGN TEAM: INITIAL SITE DEVELOPMENT + PROGRAMMATIC ANALYSIS 3 • Continue discussions about each speci c program area and function; identify critical 9 relationships, adjacencies, and operational protocols • Review updated program matrix and discuss suggested revisions; continue program discussions about program areas and functions • Present and discuss preliminary site utilization plans, conceptual organizational oor 16 plans, stacking, and building massing diagrams • Continue discussion of site circumstances, circulation, provision of building utilities, and their potential impact on site costs
4 4. PROJECT + DESIGN TEAM: SITE + PROGRAMMATIC ANALYSIS + BUILDING DEVELOPMENT 23 • Review pre- nal draft program revisions and reach consensus on nal program for use in Initial Building Development
30
105 LEGEND
Design Team & Project Team Public & Town Staff
Public Town Staff
APR 4. CONTINUED... • Continue detailed discussion of site circumstances, circulation, building utilities, and their potential impact on site costs; discuss options for source of building utilities • Begin discussion of revised organizational stacking and building massing diagrams; 5 13 discuss potential exterior treatments; identify preferred building massing 6 5. PROJECT AND DESIGN TEAM: SITE AND BUILDING DEVELOPMENT • Initial presentation of building con gurations with addressing program, adjacencies, circulation, parking, outdoor space, and scale 20 • Additional investigations, including the inclusion of underground parking as part of site/building strategy • Review draft of Master Plan Review Presentation materials before presenting to Town Council 7 27 6. MASTERPLAN REVIEW PRESENTATION • Site analysis drawing • Report of meeting with planning staff and other site constraints MAY • Historic project images
8 • Draft budget, project schedule, and updated program
9 7. BUILDING DEVELOPMENT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN ALTERNATIVES • Generate multiple design approaches for selected organizational strategies 11 • Present buildings within the context of master plan and site development strategy
8. INITIAL CONCEPTUAL DESIGN: PUBLIC WORKSHOP 1
18 9. INITIAL CONCEPTUAL DESIGN: PUBLIC WORKSHOP 2
10. DRAFT REVIEW OF FINAL CONCEPT PLAN • Present draft concept plan package to Town Staff, Planning, Building, Fire, Police, 10 25 Utility, and CCAC for comments/adjustments before presentation to Town Council
11. FINAL CONCEPT PLAN • Upon receipt of comment from draft reviews, Bohlin Cywinski Jackson will JUN 11 incorporate them into the nal Concept Plan and submit for review by Town Council • Present Final Concept Plan, which includes building plan, building elevations, section 3D digital model, and exterior materials and nishes • Present Concept Phase Cost Estimate with Project Team
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 106
PROFESSIONAL FEES
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 108 Weyerhaeuser Hall, University of Puget Sound | Tacoma, Washington
Standard Houly Rates for Atherton Civic Center
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Principal $280 Senior Associate $170 Associate $135 Staff 1 $120 Staff 2 $110 Staff 3 $80 Office $75
Einwiller Kuehl Principal $210 Designer $110 Research/Admin $75
Sherwood Enigneers Principal $260 Senior Engineer/Designer $205 Project Manager $180 Designer I $135 Designer II $125 CAD/Graphics $130 Project Assistant $90
Rutherford + Chekene Principal $210 Senior Engineer $155 Design Engineer $125 CADD/Revit Specialist $125
Integral Group Principal $270 Project Manager $175 Project Engineer $145 BIM Designer $135
Standard Hourly Rates Niteo Principal $150 Designer $110 Clerical $50
Charles Salter Associates President/ Sr. VP $300 VP/Director $270 Principal Consultant $225 TheStandard 2014/2015 hourly rates Houly for the Design Rates Team are asfor follows: Senior Consultant $170 Consultant $150 Atherton Civic Center Technical Assistant $100
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson The Fire Consultants Principal $280 Principal $225 Senior Associate $170 Associate $135 Staff 1 $120 Watry Design Principal Architect $255 Staff 2 $110 Principal Structural $255 Staff 3 $80 Senior Project Manager $180 Office $75 Asst. Project Manager $165 Staff Designer $140 Einwiller Kuehl Job Captain $160 Principal $210 Administrative $105 Designer $110 Research/Admin $75 Oppenheim Lewis Principal $175 Sherwood Enigneers Cost Consultant $135 Principal $260 Clerical $100 Senior Engineer/Designer $205 Project Manager $180 Designer I $135 SGH Senior Principal $295 Designer II $125 Principal $275 CAD/Graphics $130 Senior Project Manager $215 Project Assistant $90 Sr. Staff I Engineer $150 Staff II Engineer $129 Rutherford + Chekene Principal $210 Senior Engineer $155 The Preview Group Principal $200 Design Engineer $125 CADD/Revit Specialist $125 Jay Farbstein & Associates Integral Group Principal Programmer $270 Senior Programmer $185 Principal $270 Programmer $120 Project Manager $175 Technical/Clerical $80 Project Engineer $145 BIM Designer $135 Security Consultant (TBD) Niteo Principal $200 Principal $150 Designer $110 Clerical $50
Charles Salter Associates President/ Sr. VP $300 VP/Director $270 Principal Consultant $225 Senior Consultant $170 Consultant $150 Technical Assistant $100
The Fire Consultants BohlinPrincipal Cywinski Jackson $225 110
Watry Design Principal Architect $255 Principal Structural $255 Senior Project Manager $180 Asst. Project Manager $165 Staff Designer $140 Job Captain $160 Administrative $105
Oppenheim Lewis Principal $175 Cost Consultant $135 Clerical $100
SGH Senior Principal $295 Principal $275 Senior Project Manager $215 Sr. Staff I Engineer $150 Staff II Engineer $129
The Preview Group Principal $200
Jay Farbstein & Associates Principal Programmer $270 Senior Programmer $185 Programmer $120 Technical/Clerical $80
Security Consultant (TBD) Principal $200
ARCHITECTURAL AGREEMENT
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 112 Goosewing Headhouse | Rhode Island
Architectural Agreement
Contract Acceptance
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson has reviewed the Town of Atherton’s standard Professional Services Agreement attached as appendix 5 of the RFP and have two items that we would like to address in the agreement:
• On Page 34, the agreement states that ‘Time is of the Essence’ with a specific indemnity clause to hold the Town harmless in the case of damages that result from extensions in the schedule. As you know, there are many factors outside of our control with respect to project schedule and the performance of our services. As written this clause is not insurable by our insurance carrier.
• On Page 35, related to project billing, the contract specifies that payment can be contingent on satisfaction with performance of our services, with the right to offset payment to us, when, based on “reasonable opinion” it is justified. This is an unusual clause to find a professional services agreement. Per ordinary industry procedure and the standard of care, typically payment is made and then mediation is pursued in order to resolve disputes.
Beyond these two paragraphs, we are in general agreement with the terms of the standard document subject to a final review with you and our insurance carrier.
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 114
APPENDIX
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 116 Dry Creek Outbuildings | Northern California Bohlin Cywinski Jackson | Architecture RESUMES
Profile
Steve Chaitow is a principal with Bohlin Cywinski Jackson’s San Francisco office. After having worked with firms in Pittsburgh, Boston, and Cologne, Germany, Steve joined Bohlin Cywinski Jackson in 1997. In his career, he has worked on many award-winning civic, university, and commercial projects, including a new civic center for the city of Newport Beach, a federal courthouse in Florida; a library for the Corning Museum of Glass in Corning, New York; a renovation of Hasty Pudding Theater at Harvard University; an oceanographic building at the University of Washington; and a new digital arts center for the University of California, Santa Cruz.
Steve has worked on improving design delivery processes in the interest of creating better, more sustainable buildings. With his collaborative, inclusive style, he has worked with owners, design teams, and contractors in creating places that simultaneously inspire and meet the client’s core needs.
Steve most recently served as project manager for the Newport Beach Civic Center and Park. The Civic Center is comprised of city offices, a council chamber, Steven D. Chaitow, AIA, LEED AP, BD+C an extension of the existing main library, and a new parking garage and an Bohlin Cywinski Jackson emergency operations center —all located on a rehabilitated 17-acre site. The Principal-in-Charge project is certified LEED Gold.
Education Selected Experience
Carnegie Mellon University, Newport Beach Civic Center and Park Computerm Bachelor of Architecture, 1991 Newport Beach, California Corporate Headquarters University of California, Santa Cruz ABB Professional Registration Digital Arts Research Center (DARC) Regional Sales Office Santa Cruz, California Architecture: MA, PA, AZ East Liberty University of California, San Diego Kelly Strayhorne Theater Natural Sciences Building Professional Affiliations Apple, Inc. San Diego, California Campus Improvements NCARB Corning Museum of Glass US Federal Courts American Institute of Architects Rakow Research Library George C. Young Courthouse* AIA California Corning, New York Hasty Pudding AIA San Francisco University of Washington, Seattle Theater Renovation* Society of College and University Planners Ocean Sciences Building Seattle, Washington USGBC Northern California Chapter *Work with another firm Sustainable Design Leaders
Teaching Activities
Boston Architectural Center, Professor California College of the Arts, Design Critic Harvard University, Design Critic Carnegie Mellon University, Design Critic Rhode Island School of Design, Design Critic Profile
Greg is a Principal in Bohlin Cywinski Jackson’s San Francisco office. As lead designer for a diverse group of award-winning commercial, workplace, hospitality, academic, and civic buildings, he possesses a deep understanding of how buildings can shape and transform their environment. This is exemplified in his work for the Newport Beach Civic Center and Park, the Lorry I. Lokey Graduate School of Business at Mills College, and for technology companies that include Square, Inc. and Adobe, Inc.
In addition, Greg leads the design for a variety of extraordinary private residences— ranging from modest remodels in Northern California; to custom homes in established urban neighborhoods and suburban communities; to mountain retreats on remote sites in Utah and Lake Tahoe. He is keenly interested in the tectonics of building and how Modernism is shaped by the specific circumstances of place to create memorable, emotionally powerful architecture.
Greg joined Bohlin Cywinski Jackson in 1990, working in the firm’s Pittsburgh and Philadelphia offices before relocating to California in 2003, where he leads the San Gregory R. Mottola, AIA, Architect AIBC Francisco office with partners Karl Backus and Steve Chaitow. He has chaired Bohlin Cywinski Jackson and participated in design awards juries across the country, and regularly lectures Design Principal on the topics of humane modernism, craft, and detail, and how these themes influence the work of the firm.
Education Selected Experience
Carnegie Mellon University, Newport Beach Civic Center and Park Ragazza Restaurant Bachelor of Architecture, cum laude, 1991 Newport Beach, California San Francisco, California
Lorry I. Lokey Graduate School of Business House for a Structural Engineer Professional Registration Mills College, Oakland Los Altos, California Architecture: CA (C32224) PA, NJ, MN, IL, BC Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut Voyageur Du Temps Bakery Art History Museum, Austin Arts Center Los Altos, California Admissions and Career Services Center Professional Affiliations University of Washington Hartford, Connecticut Ocean Sciences Building NCARB Creekside Residence Seattle, Washington American Institute of Architects Northern California Carnegie Mellon University AIA California Square, Inc. Headquarters Intelligent Workplace AIA San Francisco San Francisco, California Carnegie Mellon Research Institute AIBC Architectural Institute of British Columbia Twitter Headquarters Expansion Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Society of College and University Planners San Francisco, California University of California, Los Angeles SPUR Member KKR Asset Management, LLC, Headquarters Luskin Conference and Guest Center Los Angeles, California San Francisco, California Teaching Activities Adobe, Inc. Corporate Headquarters University of Puget Sound, Tacoma Center for Health Sciences California College of the Arts, Design Critic San Francisco, California Tacoma, Washington Philadelphia University, Design Critic Adobe, Inc. Annex Building Kendall-Jackson, La Jota Winery University of California, Berkeley, Design Critic San Francisco, California Howell Mountain, California Pittsburgh Cultural Trust Harris Theater Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Halls Ridge Knoll Guest House Santa Lucia Preserve, California Farrar Residence Senator John Heinz History Center Park City, Utah Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Lantern House Aleutian Islands, Alaska Profile
Josh is a senior associate in Bohlin Cywinski Jackson’s San Francisco office. After graduating from Kent State University, Josh worked for architectural firms in Cleveland, Pittsburgh, and Washington, DC before joining Bohlin Cywinski Jackson in 1999. In his time with the firm, he has worked on many award-winning projects. He has served as architect and project manager on numerous Apple retail stores, such as North Michigan Avenue in Chicago, and the first high-profile European store in London.
Josh has also contributed to a variety of other projects, including Pixar Animation Studios in Emeryville, California; Halls Ridge Knoll Guest House in Carmel, California; and La Jota Winery (unbuilt). In his most recent role as project architect for Newport Beach Civic Center and Park, Josh was central in coordinating the architectural design with the engineering systems.
In addition to his architectural achievements, Josh is active in both academia and arts, teaching in the architectural department of San Francisco Academy of Art and the sculpture department at San Francisco Art Institute. He has an active studio Josh Keller, RA and conceptual art practice, as well. His work has been exhibited at The Headlands Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Center for the Arts, The Legion of Honor, the de Young Museum, and Toomey Tourell Project Manager Fine Arts.
Education Selected Experience
San Francisco Art Institute, Newport Beach Civic Center and Park Halls Ridge Knoll Guest House Masters of Fine Arts, 2009 Newport Beach, California Carmel, California
Kent State University, Pixar Animation Studios Residential Furniture Suite Bachelor of Architecture, 1996 Emeryville, California Palo Alto, California Apple, Inc. Old Mission Cottage Kent State University , Regent Street, London Traverse City, Michigan Bachelor of Science, 1996 Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan Shibuya, Tokyo, Japan Westmorland Museum of Art Greensburg* Professional Registration Midtown, New York City North Michigan Avenue, Chicago *Work with another firm Architecture: PA Kendall-Jackson La Jota Winery, Howell Mountain
Farrar Residence Park City, Utah Profile
Lena Shah joined the San Francisco office in 2011 and has more than 12 years of experience in architecture and interiors. Her project experience ranges from small to large scale commercial, educational, residential, and civic projects. Lena is involved from the earliest stages of programming to overseeing the final details in construction administration.
Lena was an essential member of the interior architecture design team for KKR’s and Square’s headquarters. She also developed the interior finishes and furnishings for Newport Beach Civic Center and Park. For both KKR and Square, Lena developed full contractual documents to ensure final build out represented the firm’s design aspirations. She also coordinated mechanical and building systems needs, current codes, and ADA requirements. She ensured consultants made timely submissions and their documentation was compatible with the project’s design goals.
Lena’s educational and professional experience gives her an exceptional ability to resolve complex technical and design issues, in the service of exceptional projects that are responsive to a client’s needs. Lena Shah Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Project Designer | Interiors
Education Selected Experience
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Newport Beach Civic Center and Park UC Berkeley Regatta Museum Masters of Architecture, 2002 Newport Beach, California Collections Facility* Square, Inc. Headquarters Richmond, California University of Florida, San Francisco, California Poway Art Center* Bachelor of Architectural Design, 1998 KKR Asset Management, LLC, Headquarters Poway, California San Francisco, California Park City Museum* Professional Affiliations Twitter Headquarters Expansion Park City, Utah Associate AIA San Francisco, California 430 Park Avenue* Associate IIDA Casa Hogar* New York, New York Atherton, California GM Motors Building* Clovis Memorial District Conference Center* New York, New York Clovis, California 1 Rockefeller Center* Trinity School Enrichment Center* New York, New York Trinity, California 100 Park Avenue* SFMOMA Sculptural Garden* New York, New York San Francisco, California *Work with another firm Studio One Art Center* Oakland, California Casa Robertson* Maui, Hawaii Profile
As design principal for numerous Apple stores worldwide, as well as the creative headquarters for Pixar Animation Studios, the Glendale Creative Campus interiors, and the new Shrem Museum of Art at UC Davis, Karl Backus has contributed to some of the firm’s most memorable and iconic buildings.
These landmark buildings have changed the nature of how individuals behave in workplace, cultural, and retail spaces by emphasizing thoughtful building organization to foster interaction and engagement. The buildings also enhance the individual experience of each place through well-designed interiors with an emphasis on light, comfort, circulation, and connections to the outside environment. Karl’s other buildings—teaching facilities, private residences—are imprinted with this same care for the human experience as much as they express a highly refined sense of craft.
Karl joined Bohlin Cywinski Jackson in 1983 and currently leads the San Francisco office with partners Greg Mottola and Steve Chaitow. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Architecture from Georgia Institute of Technology. In addition to practice, Karl A. Backus, AIA Karl also lectures about the concepts of humane modernism and how such Bohlin Cywinski Jackson concepts are applied through his work with the firm. Design Resource
Education Selected Experience
Georgia Institute of Technology, University of California, Davis Digital Arts Corporate Campus Bachelor of Science in Architecture, 1979 Shrem Museum of Art Los Angeles, California Davis, California University of California, San Francisco Professional Registration Pixar Animation Studios California Institute for Quantitative Emeryville, California Biosciences QB3 Architecture: PA Apple Inc. High Profile US Stores San Francisco, California Boston University of Washington, Seattle Professional Affiliations Chicago (Lincoln Park, North Michigan Avenue) Ocean Sciences Building American Institute of Architects Los Angeles Seattle, Washington AIA California Montreal University of Washington, Seattle New York (Soho, West 14th Street, Fifth Avenue, AIA San Francisco School of Fisheries Upper West Side) Seattle, Washington Palo Alto (Stanford, University Avenue) Teaching Activities Philadelphia University of Pittsburgh San Francisco Biotechnology Center 2011 Portman Prize Visiting Critic, Georgia Washington Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Institute of Technology Apple Inc. High Profile International Stores Turtle Bay Exploration Park China (Beijing, Shanghai) Visitor Center and Museum Lectures France (Aix-en-Provence, Louvre, Opera) Redding, California Germany (Berlin, Frankfurt, Munich) Sacramento House Humane Modernism, Evolution of a Practice, Glasgow Sacramento, California Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, February Japan (Ginza, Nagoya, Omotesando, Osaka, Shibuya) Mountain Retreat London (Covent Garden, Regent Street) 2011 Park City, Utah Spain (Barcelona, Madrid) Humane Modernism, Apple Stores and Beyond, Sydney Old Mission Bay Cottage Festival of Architecture, AIBC Conference, University of California, Santa Cruz Grand Traverse Bay, Michigan Vancouver, BC, May 2011 Digital Arts Research Center (DARC) Santa Cruz, California Profile
Peter is one of the founding principals of the firm, which began practice as Bohlin and Powell in 1965. The firm’s success, and the professional recognition it has attained, are in large measure attributable to his design insights and unflagging dedication to setting the highest standards for all design work produced by the firm. His leadership and inspiration have established a culture of thoughtful, thorough design thinking throughout the practice, and he remains keenly interested in both broad conceptual thinking and detail expression, reviewing the development of design and documentation regularly with project teams.
In 2010, the American Institute of Architects awarded Peter with the Gold Medal, the highest honor for an individual in the profession.
Peter Q. Bohlin, FAIA Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Founding Principal
Education Selected Experience
Cranbrook Academy of Art, Newport Beach Civic Center and Park Pixar Animation Studios Masters of Architecture Newport Beach, California Headquarters, Phase I and II Emeryville, California Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Seattle City Hall Seattle, Washington Local Vine Wine Bar Bachelor of Architecture Ballard Library Seattle, Washington Professional Registration Seattle Public Library Tan Shui Residential Towers and Seattle, Washington Clubhouse Architecture: PA, MA, NY, CT, MD, VA, WV, OH, Mills College Taiwan NJ, FL, VT, MT, RI and District of Columbia Lokey Graduate School of Business Copperhill Mountain Lodge Oakland, California Are, Sweden Professional Affiliations Trinity College UCLA Terasaki Life Sciences Building Admissions and Career Services Center Los Angeles, California Fellow of the American Institute of Architects Austin Arts Center UCSD Natural Sciences Building Art History Museum San Diego, California Hartford, Connecticut UCSC Digital Arts Research Center Grand Teton Discovery and Visitor Center Santa Cruz, California Moose, Wyoming UCSF Quantitative Biomedical Eng., QB3 Apple, Inc., High Profile Stores: San Francisco, California North America, Europe, Asia and Australia EinwillerKuehl | Landscape Architecture FIRM BIO
Einwiller Kuehl Landscape Architecture was founded in 2012 to build extraordinary places by combining Sarah Kuehl and Liz Einwiller’s complementary talents.
Sarah and Liz met while working at Peter Walker and Partners (PWP), where they collaborated on a diverse range of built projects. As a partner at PWP, Sarah led project visioning, design concepts, and design strategy with Liz’s support and technical knowledge. As partner in charge of construction, Liz led detailed design, construction documentation, and field with Sarah’s support and design management. At Einwiller Kuehl design is a process that responds to the unique opportunities of the site and the client’s needs. Einwiller Kuehl creates a project specific scaffold of imagery, precedents, details, consultants, fabricators, and craftspeople that supports innovation and quality control. Our complementary and cooperative internal structure allows us to work with clients and other team members in a spirit of lively collaboration and results oriented design. Significant civic projects completed by Sarah and Liz while at PWP include the University of Texas at Dallas Campus Landscape Improvements and the Newport Beach City Hall and Park. Current projects include a long term vision plan and a series of strategic project based landscape renovations for a corporate campus in Cupertino, California; the Design and Environmental clearance for a new park at the base of the Bay Bridge in Oakland, CA, the design of a temporary landscape adjacent to a historic structure for the opening of the Bay Bridge, and a private residence with significant gardens on a steep site in San Francisco.
www.einwillerkuehl.com 874 41st Street Oakland, CA 94608 510-891-1696 Einwiller Kuehl Inc.
RESUMES
Sarah uehl oun er
Sarah uehl is a partner with over 1 years of experience. She has led numerous projects ranging in scale, budget, and design character, developing close partnerships with clients and bringing both design vision and project know-how to the realization of their projects. Sarah is a licensed andsca e rchitect and a riendl andsca e certified and has extensive experience in integrating site systems aimed at achieving long- term site sustainability.
Projects completed while Sarah was a partner at PWP include the campus of Pixar Animation Studios in Emeryville, California and the Newport Beach City Hall and Park in Newport Beach, California.
She lives in Oakland, CA with her husband, a kinetic sculptor, and their children.
Licenses California 5 0 Oregon LA81
ucation University of California, Berkeley Master of Landscape Architecture, 1 8
Harvard University Bachelor of Arts in Social Studies, magna cum laude, 1
ro essiona perience PWP Landscape Architecture, 1 8-2011
874 41ST STREET OAKLAND CALIFORNIA 94608 (510) 891-1696 www.einwillerkuehl.com Sarah Kuehl
Representative Work Inter-urban Electric Rail Bridge Yard (IERBYS) temporary plaza for Bay Bridge Opening, Oakland, CA Corporate Campus Tree Management Plan, Cupertino, CA Corporate Campus Enhancements, Cupertino, CA Corporate Campus Vision Plan, Cupertino, CA Completed while at Peter Walker and Partners: Newport Beach City Hall and Park, Newport Beach, California Stanford University Graduate School of Business, Palo Alto, California Pixar Animation Studios, Emeryville, California University of Texas at Dallas Landscape Master Plan, Richardson, Texas University of California, Merced Campus Master Plan Rice University Central uadrangle, Houston, Texas North Carolina Museum of Art Gallery Expansion, Raleigh, North Carolina Speedway Promenade and the East Mall, University of Texas, Austin, Texas Jack S. Blanton Museum of Art, Austin, Texas LBNL Molecular Foundry, Berkeley, California DFI Resources, Hilltop Residence, and D Ranch, Austin, Texas ramlich Residence, Oakville, California Pennsylvania Avenue at the White House Competition, Washington, D.C. Urban Design and Security Plan, Washington, D.C. University of California, Mission Bay, San Francisco, California Campus Performing Arts Center, University of California, Davis, California Imperial Bank, Costa Mesa, California
eac in treme LA: Austin, 2010 Lecturer, Department of Landscape Architecture, University of California, Berkeley Teaching Assistant, Laboratorio Architette Nomade, NJIT Summer Program, Naples, Italy Teaching Assistant, University of California, Berkeley Extension Graduate Student Instructor, University of California, Berkeley Teaching Fellow in Photography, Department of Visual And Environmental Studies, Harvard College
onors Fellow, American Academy in Rome, 2004 2005 College of Environmental Design Alumni Association Award, 1 8 ASLA Merit Award, 1 8 H. Leland Vaughn Prize in Landscape Architecture, University of California, Berkeley, 1 8 Fred Barlow Design Award, University of California, Berkeley, 1 7
Lectures an nvitations City + Water, UC Berkeley, 2014 GOOD Design Bay Area, 2010, “Nutureforce” SF Chronicle Empty Lots Challenge, 200 nside the office of AIA San Diego, 200 , “Perimeter security” Frameworks Issue 4, 200 , “Weeds Holes and Dirt” Colorado ASLA, 2004 “Perimeter security and landscapes of fear” Liz Einwiller oun er
Liz Einwiller is a partner with 20 years of experience working on a diverse range of project types including parks, campuses, museums, estates, roof gardens, urban streetscapes, and corporate and governmental renovations. Liz oversaw and directed the preparation for all landscape architecture construction documents and construction-phase services during her time at PWP Landscape Architecture. She is a licensed landscape architect and serves as a mentor and leader in the field of construction detailing.
Recent projects include completed while at PWP include Newport Beach City Hall and Park, University of Texas at Dallas Campus Enhancement Project, and the Transbay Transit Center Park.
She and her husband have two children and live in Oakland, California.
License California 5871
ucation Rhode Island School of Design Master of Landscape Architecture, 1 4
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture, 1 1
ro essiona perience PWP Landscape Architecture, 1 -2012 GLS 1 7-1 HO 1 4-1 7
874 41ST STREET OAKLAND CALIFORNIA 94608 (510) 891-1696 www.einwillerkuehl.com Liz Einwiller
Representative Work Project 278, Palo Alto, California Inter-urban Electric Rail Bridgeyard Yard (IERBYS) temporary plaza for Bay Bridge Opening, Oakland, CA Corporate Campus Tree Management Plan, Cupertino, CA Corporate Campus Enhancements, Cupertino, CA Corporate Campus Vision Plan, Cupertino, CA Completed while at Peter Walker and Partners: Transbay Transit Center Park in San Francisco: 50% complete Construction Documents Newport Beach City Hall and Park, Newport Beach, California University of Texas at Dallas Campus Enhancement Project Barnsdall Park in Los Angeles Novartis Hollis Green Park, Emeryville, California United States Embassy, Beijing Jamison Square, Portland, Oregon.
Lectures City + Water, UC Berkeley, 2014 ASLA 2011, “Perspectives on Soils Design: Opportunities and Challenges” SCOPE OF WORK
I. ASSUMPTIONS
A. EINWILLERKUEHL, Inc. (EK) will provide services as a consultant to BCJ. Management, administration and direction of our services, coordination of design approval, definition of project schedule, administration of the plan check, bid, and construction processes and establishment of procedures for coordination with client and other sub consultants will be provided by . BCJ EK will be responsible to coordinate our work BCJ with the team and to meet the requirements established by the client. B. The project is area described in Exhibit A attached at the . end of the document C. The proposal sumes as consultant s under contract , to BCJ such as structural, civil, MEP, waterproofing, code, etc. will be utilized by EK for the landscape design. Fees for these consultants are not included in EK’s fees outlined in this proposal. D. BCJ shall be responsible for team protocols, such as establishing and maintaining an ftp site for team coordination and maintaining a team issues/action K list. E will submit to BCJ electronic versions of its documents via a project FTP site for printing and distribution by others.
II. SCOPE OF SERVICES
A. TASK ONE: Master Plan Review and Programming The intent of Master Plan Review and Programming is to confirm and refine the master plan with new data and new design eyes In on the project. particular the landscape ct archite will work to define and identify the existing and potential new outdoor space elements and to assist in defining appropriate budgets for the project. The products to be produced Master by EK during Plan Review and Programming are as follows: a. Site analysis: Drawings, photographs,etc. b. Landscape History and Context: Drawings, photographs, etc. c. Input on project budget
www.einwillerkuehl.com 874 41st Street Oakland, CA 94608 510.891.1696 Einwiller Kuehl Inc.
d. Outdoor space program: Drawings, photographs, etc.
B. TASK TWO: Conceptual Design Phase The intent of the Conceptual Design Phase is to work collaboratively with the architect and the design team invent to a series of options that describe physical design solutions that achieve the project program. The Landscape Architect will in particular be concerned with the overall site planning defining building locations and massing, indoor outdoor adjacencies, and the overall spirit of the site as it relates to local ecologies, in particular the existing trees. Landscape architect will participate with public workshops and road shows to help further define and refine preferred alternatives. The products to be produced by EK during Conceptual Design Phase are as follows: a. Concept Alternatives: Up to 6 options and presentation drawings of up to 2 preferred alternatives in public workshops. b. Matrix of Pros and Cons for each alternative c. Draft Final Concept Landscape Site Plan including typical site sections and relationships d. Input on conceptual cost estimate e. Final Concept Landscape Site Plan including typical site sections and relationships shown with 3D modeling
C. TASK THREE: Schematic Design The intent of Schematic Design services is to identify in collaboration with the team, a preferred landscape design concept. The starting point for the design will be the Schematic Design set issued July 8, 2014 and the landscape concept sketch provided at our meeting on August 5, 2014. The proposed landscape design will be cognizant of technical constraints—especially structural limitations for soil volume, site access limitations, and steep slopes-‐-‐; previous planning approval and approved variances; and budgetary framework provided by the client representative. Aesthetic control of the site grading and drainage is assumed by the landscape architect. Design input on the civil engineer’s proposal for C3 compliance will be provided in sketch format.
www.einwillerkuehl.com 874 41st Street Oakland, CA 94608 510.891.1696 Einwiller Kuehl Inc.
Planting design will accommodate C3 requirements. Landscape architect will provide 1 public workshop and a formal presentation to the town council as part of this phase work. The products to be produced by EK during Schematic Design will be issued at 60% and 100% milestones and are as follows:
a. One schematic landscape site plan b. Conceptual landscape grading — plan refining the work established by the civil engineer, c. Cross sections and elevations as necessary to convey the landscape design intent at an appropriate scale, d. 3D modeling to show the project design and illuminate the relationships between landscape and architecture, e. Precedent imagery f. Outline specifications g. Preliminary Green Building Analysis: WELO h. Presentations drawings of the above as needed to describe the design intent. i. List of potential cost control and quality control opportunities
D. TASK FOUR: Design Development Based on the client’s approval of and Schematic Design BCJ’s authorization to proceed, EK will provide Design Development services to refine the Schematic Design, fixing and describing the visual, material, and functional character of its components. The intent of the Design Development phase is to document, at a more detailed level, the critical elements, materials, and relationships which comprise the design. The documents produced will not be sufficient for bidding or construction. All documents will be prepared in CAD (AutoCAD 2013.) The documents in conjunction with quantity take offs should be sufficient for the contractor or cost estimator to estimate the scope and costs of the project. Progress sets will be issued at 50% and 100% milestones of the drawings below. The products to be produced by EK during Design Development are as follows: a. Landscape Materials Plan
www.einwillerkuehl.com 874 41st Street Oakland, CA 94608 510.891.1696 Einwiller Kuehl Inc.
b. Landscape Grading and Drainage Plan—finalizing aesthetics of topography, c. Landscape Soils Plan, d. Planting plan, e. Hydrozone plan with WELO calculations and plant palette f. Design details such ross as c sections and elevations to convey the landscape design intent and material relationships (not engineered), g. Draft Specifications. E. TASK FIVE: Construction Documentation Prior to the commencement of CDS, project design will be cost estimated and the budget will be approved based on Design Development documents. Though EK will remain involved in the aesthetics and horticultural success of the grading and drainage plan, it is assumed that the final construction intent will be documented by the civil engineer. Scope of landscape construction documents for on grade conditions will include all planting and irrigation, landscape structures not attached to buildings, site furniture, decorative landscape pavements—i.e. not including roads, parking, other driveways, or vehicular pavements that are anticipated to be covered in civil package. It is assumed that site walls retaining will be documented by architect as they are integral with architecture. Scope of landscape construction documents for on structure conditions will include only planting and irrigation. All documents will be prepared in CAD (AutoCAD 2013.) a. Landscape Materials Plan, b. Landscape Layout Plan, c. Landscape Soils Plan, d. Landscape Planting Plan, e. Irrigation Plan f. Details g. Specifications F. TASK SIX: Bidding Phase EK will provide bidding support to BCJ and the contractor to establish the cost for the project. EK will provide clarifications and support for the permit effort by others.
www.einwillerkuehl.com 874 41st Street Oakland, CA 94608 510.891.1696 Einwiller Kuehl Inc.
G. TASK SEVEN: Construction Administration Phase The intent of Construction Administration is to provide review and acceptance of plants, materials and construction. It is strongly recommended that the selected landscape contractor and the landscape architect have a page turn prior to start of construction. The products to be produced by EK during Construction Phase Services are as follows: a. Plant Materials Reports b. Field Reports c. Responses to Submittals and RFIs d. Record Drawings(n.b. These are NOT As-‐builts) e. Required documents for green building and WELO.
III. EXCLUSIONS
The following services are excluded, but could be added at a later date: presentation models, presentation renderings, cost estimates, site lighting implementation photo ( -‐metrics, fixture schedules and electrical design), water features, exterior maintenance guidelines and related cost analysis or reports, interior landscapes, waterproofing or details that tie into waterproofing, labor and materials for design mock ups, agency fees, legal descriptions, permitting, LEED documentation, BFL documentation, tree survey, soils testing, and site signage.
Special fundraising efforts that go beyond the materials and design described in the above scope description are also excluded. However the landscape architect assumes that the landscape will be a good opportunity aising for fundr and will work with the town to achieve that goal.
www.einwillerkuehl.com 874 41st Street Oakland, CA 94608 510.891.1696 Einwiller Kuehl Inc.
Sherwood Engineers | Civil Engineering FIRM BIO
FIRM PROFILE
Sherwood Design Engineers is a group of forward-thinking designers committed to RECENT AWARDS
pioneering tomorrow’s sustainable solutions in today’s communities. 2014 Livable Buildings Award The David and Lucile Packard Foundation At Sherwood, we value both great planning and solid engineering. What sets us apart Headquarters Center for the Built Environment, University of in the international design community is our dedication to developing measurable California Berkeley environmentally responsible infrastructure and unique sustainable engineering innovation. 2014 Top Ten Projects Green building is an integral part of the philosophy we bring to all our projects. Our firm The David and Lucile Packard Foundation has demonstrated leadership in sustainable infrastructure through project innovation, Headquarters American Institute of Architects international publication and academic contributions. We have multiple LEED accredited 2014 Citation Awards: Energy + Sustainability green-build professionals on staff, in-house ecologists on our design team, and we bring Sacred Heart Schools Net Zero Stevens Library a history of sound, technical engineering to every assignment. Across the globe, we have American Institute of Architects, San Francisco
implemented new technologies and green-design innovations on projects ranging from 2013 Top Storm Water & Erosion the engineering of individual buildings to the master planning of large-scale developments Control Projects Orange County Great Park, Irving, California and sustainable communities. 2013 Most Beautiful Business Monterey Ranger District Office, As engineers we believe that true sustainability requires considering all aspects of a Monterey, California
project’s design, development, and impact; and clients continually seek us out for our 2013 AIA Merit Award for Sustainability integrated approach to large-scale, environmentally sensitive projects. Our planning begins Lands End Lookout and Visitor Center, San Francisco, California with specific site research to assess environmental constraints and opportunities, and our 2013 AIA Honor Award for Sustainability process encourages the active participation of all parties involved, including clients, other Packard Foundation, Los Altos (EHDD) designers, public agencies, and the local community. 2013 AIA Honor Award for Regional & Urban Design Sherwood has been responsible for master planning and infrastructure designs for high- Nanhu New Country Village Master Plan, Nanhu, China profile projects from the building-scale to the city-scale. Our team engineered resilient 2013 AIA/COTE Top Ten Green Projects infrastructure for the Hudson Yards high-density urban development in New York. We have Marin Country Day School, Corte Madera, designed sustainable urban planning to projects from the San Francisco Better Streets California
Plan, to the San Mateo Green Streets Guidebook. We applied our expertise in innovative 2012 AIA Design Award stormwater management to projects in San Francisco like the urban redevelopment of Branson Commons, Ross, California
Mint Plaza that precipitated new standards for innovative management of stormwater in 2012 ASLA Merit Award San Francisco. Each of our designs incorporates the best combination of technology and Yerba Buena Street Plan, San Francisco, California sustainability. Everywhere we work we provide creative engineering designs that make 2012 ASLA Honor Award positive contributions to the local economy and environment. Marin Country Day School, Corte Madera, California
SAN FRANCISCO NEW YORK CITY HOUSTON DESIGN ENGINEERS www.sherwoodengineers.com RESUMES
KEY PERSONNEL
S. Bry Sarté, Principal in Charge, PE, LEED AP
Bry Sarté, founder of Sherwood Design Engineers, leads an international practice of civil and environmental engineers based in San Francisco, New York and Houston. As a leading designer and academic in ecological and sustainable engineering, he has been published internationally and has made significant contributions to contemporary research involving global environmental issues affecting water supply, urban design, material science and energy use. Sarté has built an international reputation by providing engineering services and design solutions that reflect a deep commitment to executing well-planned, Education sustainable projects worldwide. University of California, Berkeley Bachelor of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering; Emphasis: Mr. Sarté has served as lead engineer for hundreds of the world’s Environmental Engineering University of Canterbury, New Zealand leading sustainable engineering projects. Many of the projects were Masters research in Environmental the first-of-their kind in applying green engineering systems, strategies Engineering University of California, Santa Cruz and concepts. From innovative planning projects on one end of the Bachelor of Arts in Fine Arts spectrum to implemented construction projects on the other, much of Sarté’s work has been highly integrated, highly collaborative design Academics Adjunct Associate Professor of developed in tandem with many of the world’s leading architecture and Architecture landscape architecture firms. Columbia University: Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation Master of Science in Architecture and Sarté has led the engineering design for numerous completed Urban Design construction projects that have changed the direction of how we build. Professional Registration The projects range from institutional buildings to civic infrastructure and Registered Professional Engineer, Civil Engineering in the States include many LEED Platinum and Gold projects, more than a dozen of: Arizona, California, Colorado, Living Building Challenge Projects, three of the selected pilots for the Montana, New Hampshire, New York, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, and Sustainable Sites Initiative, in addition to various other international Virginia green building standard rated projects. Projects of note that are currently
Professional Affiliations underway include: comprehensive integrated stormwater reuse American Society of Civil Engineers systems for New York’s Water Treatment Plant at Croton, sustainable UC Berkeley Alumni Association SPUR: San Francisco Planning and engineering design for Related’s Hudson Yards in New York, work Urban Research, Member; Sustainable for tech headquarters in Silicon Valley, San Francisco Better Streets Development Committee, Chair; Water Policy Board, Chair implementation, and UC Berkeley Student Center among others. Urban Land Institute, Member U.S. Green Building Council, Member Since 2013, Mr. Sarté has served as Adjunct Associate Professor of Publications Architecture at Columbia University’s Graduate School of Architecture Sustainable Infrastructure: The Guide to Green Engineering. New York: John Planning and Preservation in the Master of Science in Architecture Wiley & Sons, 2010. 400 page book. and Urban Design program. He is currently teaching the course “Integrated Water Resource planning.” American Society of Civil Engineers, Infrastructure, Resilience and Public Space. He regularly serves as 2010. White paper. a guest lecturer/speaker at the University of California Berkeley and “Watershed-Based Stormwater Management.” American Society of Civil Stanford University, as well as conferences around the world, presenting Engineers, 2008. White paper. on environmentally-sensitive design and construction.
SAN FRANCISCO NEW YORK CITY HOUSTON DESIGN ENGINEERS www.sherwoodengineers.com KEY PERSONNEL
Drew Norton, Senior Associate
Drew Norton has extensive experience designing and managing the improvement plans and construction practices for residential, institutional, private and public projects necessitating lotting, utilities, water management, erosion control, road design, grading and drainage. Mr. Norton manages some of Sherwood’s most collaborative and innovative projects in California and has over ten years of engineering experience working in Santa Cruz, Monterey, Marin, San Mateo, Napa, San Francisco and Sonoma County. This expertise encompasses strict collaboration with various consultants and design standards associated to hillside developments. Education California State University, Sacramento Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering Mr. Norton has lead Sherwood’s role in the design of a unique project in St. Helena where the project team worked to develop innovative green
Professional Registration design solutions that met project goals for sustainability and aesthetics, Engineer in Training all on a 25% slope. Collaboration with the Structural Engineer on Board of Professional Engineers and retaining walls and large foundations along with collaboration with the Land Surveyors, State of California Geotechnical Engineer on sub-drain and back of wall drain design and a sensitive stormwater dispersal design along the steep slopes Professional Affiliations American Society of Civil Engineers, were major parts of this project. A water collection system of 80,000 Member gallons was implemented in this project in order to minimize stormwater discharge, offset irrigation and synergistically provide a thermal bank for a near passive mechanical system.
Mr. Norton has managed design teams for large scale master planning and site analysis for international projects. Utilizing information such as GIS he has guided his team to perform detailed site analysis to maximize development while adhering to sensitive environmental regions. Some of the tasks his design team have exercised for projects of any scale are detailed and conceptual road design siting, ecological systems integration, green infrastructure, elaborate grading analysis, erosion and sediment control plans, while implementing Best Management Practices and supervising CAD technicians in the production of construction and non-construction documents. He has a consistent track record of keeping project work on schedule and under budget while developing strong relationships with all the project consultants.
SAN FRANCISCO NEW YORK CITY HOUSTON DESIGN ENGINEERS www.sherwoodengineers.com SCOPE OF WORK
ATHERTON CIVIC CENTER RFP SDE SCOPE OF SERVICES
2.0 PROJECT DESIGN SERVICE AND DOCUMENT OVERVIEW
It is the Civil Engineer’s understanding that the following design services and documents will be required to meet appropriate permit approvals and construction needs. The actual number of plans or documents submitted during each phase (Section 3.0) is dependent on the local permitting or coordination requirements.
The following is a detailed breakdown of the design services, plans and supporting document deliverables needed to meet requested agency and contractor construction documents requirements. The anticipated project phases and deliverables submitted are outline in Section 3.0.
1. General Coordination/Project Initiation/Meetings: a. Client and Design Team Coordination and Meetings. b. Project kick-off meeting (local). c. Data Collection and Review i. Review available information provided by the client during the time of design such as: a topographic map, design level site and utility surveys, applicable record data surveys, a geotechnical soils report, and environmental studies. ii. Recommend additional information required for design services as described herewithin. iii. Review local agency development codes and design standards as related to civil infrastructure. d. Site visit(s) and on-site meeting(s) per Section 3.0. 2. Base Plan Development a. Compile boundary survey, topographic survey, record drawings, and known utility information. b. Convert and incorporate current Design Team digital information. c. Integration of consultant updates, assume one (1) iteration per project milestone. 3. Erosion Control Plan a. ECP to NPDES standards and local agency requirements. b. Incorporation of local agency requirements and notes. 4. Demolition Plan a. Removal of on-site infrastructure including concrete, pavement, site furnishings and utilities. [Plans and protocol for active electric and gas utilities, buildings, loaded structures and any hazardous materials will be provided by others.] b. Integration of tree removal and protection as determined by a qualified arborist. c. Integration of Waste Reduction or Salvage requirements. d. Contractor Coordination. 5. Master Plan Assessment a. Review of previously prepared Master Plan. b. Project Initiation – Background data review and information gathering. c. Analysis of the Master plan, Existing Site and Constraints. d. Budget and Schedule input. e. Evaluation of stormwater regulatory compliance. 6. Site Improvement Plan a. Roadways, driveways, parking, alleys, sidewalks, ramps, curbs, and gutters. b. Roadway / driveway profiles as determined necessary. c. Site sections as determined necessary. d. Hardscape engineering design around the perimeter of the site with connection to existing systems. Collaboration with Design Team. e. Hardscape details pertaining to the dimensions, character, and content of specific site elements such as roadway, driveways, pavers, pavement, pathways, sidewalks, building edge design, landscape and hardscape connectivity, curb cuts, patching, and the relationship between existing and proposed conditions. f. Relocation, replacement and new traffic control signs (non-powered) and including submission to local agency and negotiations for approval thereof. g. Site ADA design implementation and accessibility support.
7. Grading Plan a. Coordination with Design Team. b. Incorporate Geotechnical Engineer Recommendations. c. Entrance and egress hardscape grading at buildings. d. Spot elevations around the perimeter of site improvements, grade breaks, transitions, areas of conformance and appurtenances. [Finish floor elevations provided by others.] e. Finish contours provided at half foot intervals. f. Earthwork Cut/fill calculations and quantities. 8. Drainage Plan a. Site drainage plan with agency allowed BMPs. b. Hydrologic calculations using the Rational Method. c. Stormwater BMPs designed to local (or LEED) retention/detention requirements. d. Standard details for stormwater BMP’s, drainage appurtenances, swales, drainage infrastructure and connections with references to manufacturer’s specifications. [Design of custom structures, as necessary, will be provided by others via shop drawings.] e. Wall drain network in collaboration with architect, structural and geotechnical engineer. f. Perimeter sub-drain routing, including cleanouts, bends and elevations, connection points, and outfall locations. g. Details including items such as: back-of-wall drain system, sub-slab drains, cleanouts, and outfalls h. Incorporate Structural and Geotechnical Engineer Recommendations. 9. Stormwater Control Plan a. Hydrology / hydraulic / treatment report to comply with local Agency requirements b. Supporting calculations and backup data c. Exhibits and maps d. Design Team and Client coordination e. Submittal support 10. Utility Plan: a. Final alignments, materials, size, and invert location of ‘wet’ utilities from the connection point at the property boundary to within 5 feet of building(s): i. Sanitary Sewer sizing and routing to building connections (size provided by MEP). ii. Domestic Water and Firewater routing and connections (size provided by MEP). b. Coordinate with MEP for location and routing of ‘dry’ utilities and pad locations (electric, gas, telephone, cable, internet) on-site to within 5 feet of the building(s). c. Fire Suppression system routing and sizing per local Fire Department requirements. d. Details for sewer and water structures, connections, meters, fittings, and trenching, including local agency details where applicable. 11. Alternative Water Resources (Sustainability Measures – Add Alternate) a. Evaluate and review agency requirements. b. Conduct existing water system assessment. c. Develop preliminary site Water Balance to determine demands and onsite potential to utilize groundwater, stormwater, rainwater, and graywater supply as alternative water supplies to offset municipal water use. d. Evaluate codes and regulations for alternative water sources. e. Evaluate water and wastewater treatment options. f. Evaluate alternative water system feasibility and conceptual layout. i. Rainwater collection and storage. ii. Graywater treatment and conveyance. g. Develop design criteria for the domestic water, rainwater harvesting, graywater, and wastewater treatment systems. h. System wide assessment of major stormwater components including peak storm volume and preliminary sizing of low-impact attenuation and retention opportunities. 12. Specifications a. Site Civil related specifications in CSI / Master Spec format as per Section 3.0 13. Basic Agency Coordination: a. Coordination as required under standard permit and codes. b. Coordination on Agency review comments and intent.
3.0 PROJECT PHASE AND DELIVERABLE SCOPE
The Civil Engineer proposes the following design phases to effectively meet the requested permit approvals process, planning documents, and construction documents production. Each phase is intended to enhance the design upon successive approvals so as to meet the design efforts and documents as outlined in Section 2.0 upon project completion.
The proposed design Phases for this project are:
1. Master Plan Review 2. Conceptual Design 3. Schematic Design 4. Design Development 5. Construction Documents 6. Bidding Support 7. Construction Administration
It is understood that the Civil Engineer will provide hard copies and/or electronic files to Client for final submittal to the appropriate Agency in accordance to local requirements. Refer to phase(s) below for specific deliverables.
3.1 Master Plan Review
The Civil Engineer will review the existing Master Plan alongside of the Project and Design Team. This phase will include the following design services and documents:
1. Project Initiation a. Review of background data, reports, maps and plans b. Review of the preliminary project goals, meetings, budget and schedule 2. Site Analysis a. Site Tour with Project and Design Team b. Review of reports and studies c. Advancement of existing Site Analysis 3. Contextual Analysis a. Attend the Neighborhood Tour b. Support Architect in reviewing historical documents 4. Program / Budget / Schedule a. Support the Architect in identifying the project budget, schedule and programming
Deliverables include: o One (1) Site Tour o One (1) Neighborhood Tour o Site Analysis Drawing (hand drawn) o Constraints language to support Architect’s Report
3.2 Conceptual Design
Upon project initiation and understanding Project Team goals, budget and schedule, the Civil engineer will initiate concept design efforts. The Civil Engineer anticipates that there will be one (1) milestone during this phase of the project. The concepts and studies delivered in this stage will be used for internal coordination, presentation to Client and to define the Design Team vision. This phase will include the following design services and documents:
1. Site Development – outdoor space, scale, utilities, improvements, tree preservation 2. Concept Design Alternatives a. Identify opportunities and constraints b. Inclusion of Add Alternates c. Public Workshop, Presentation and Neighborhood Roadshow [not included] d. Development of multiple Design Alternatives (2 max) 3. Sustainable Systems Layout a. Development of Alternative Water Management System concept 4. Draft Final and Final Concept Plan
5. Review of Cost Estimate
Deliverables include: o Development of Site Diagram pertaining to site improvements o Development of Design Alternative and Alt Water Management System Exhibits (2 max) o Issue Draft Final Concept Plan pertaining to Site Improvements and Alt Water Management System o Presentation / Workshop of Draft Final Concept Plan to Project Team o Issue Final Concept Plan o Site Stormwater Analysis Memorandum
3.3 Schematic Design
Upon selection of preferred design concept, the Civil engineer will initiate Schematic Design (SD) phase of this project. The Civil Engineer anticipates that there will be one (1) milestone. The studies and documents delivered in this phase will be used for internal coordination and to assist in setting the Design Team vision. The Schematic Design plans will begin to incorporate the necessary level of detail and elements as identified in Section 2.0. There will be two (2) milestones during this phase of the project, 60% SD & Final SD This phase will include the following design services and documents:
1. Project Management / Meetings 2. Site Improvement Plan 3. Grading and Drainage Plan 4. Utility Plan 5. Alternative Water Systems Plan 6. Review of Cost Estimate
Deliverables include: o Attend one (1) Design Team Kick-off meeting. o Issue 60% Progress Set o Issue 60% Schematic Design Set o Presentation to Project Team o Issue Outline Specifications o Issue Final Schematic Design Set
3.4 Design Development
Upon approval of the Schematic Design, the Civil Engineer will initiate the Design Development (DD) plans for the project. The Civil Engineer anticipates that the plans delivered in this phase will be used for Design Team and Project Team coordination, budgetary cost estimation, and Planning Dept submittal. The Design Development plans will incorporate the necessary elements identified in Section 2.0. There will be two (2) milestones during this phase of the project, 60% DD & 100% DD. This phase will include the following design services and documents:
1. Project Management / Meetings 2. Site Visit(s) 3. Erosion Control Plan 4. Demolition Plan 5. Site Improvement Plan 6. Grading Plan 7. Drainage Plan 8. Utility Plan 9. Detail Sheets 10. Stormwater Control Plan 11. Review of Cost Estimate
Deliverables include: o Attend one (1) Design Development Kick-off meeting o Attend two (2) Design Team Coordination Meetings o Attend one (1) Site Visit
o Attend one (1) Agency Meeting o Issue one (1) submittal of the 60% Design Development Plans for internal Design Team review o Issue one (1) submittal of the 100% Design Development Plans for budgetary cost estimation and Planning Department submittal o Issue modified Outline of Specifications o Issue (1) submittal of the Preliminary Stormwater Control Plan
3.8 Construction Documents
Upon approval of the Design Development Set by the Client and/or local agencies, the Civil Engineer will initiate Construction Documents (CD) for the project site. The Civil Engineer anticipates that the plans delivered in this phase will be used for City and Agency reviews, cost estimations, obtaining the Construction Permits, Bidding and for the purpose of construction. There will be three (3) milestones during this phase of the project: 60%, 90% and 100% CD. The exact deliverables for each milestone will depend on the requirements placed by the Agency requesting. This phase will include the following design services and documents:
1. Project Management / Meetings 2. Site Visit(s) 3. Erosion Control Plan 4. Demolition Plan 5. Site Improvement Plan 6. Grading Plan with Driveway Profiles 7. Drainage Plan 8. Wall and Sub-Drainage Plan 9. Utility Plan 10. Alternative Water systems Plan 11. Stormwater Control Plan 12. Detail Sheets
Deliverables include: o Attend one (1) CD Kick-off Meeting o Attend two (2) Design Team Coordination Meetings o One (1) Site Visit o One (1) Agency Meeting. o One (1) Submittal to Client of the 60% Civil Engineering Construction Document package for internal Design Team coordination §. 60% Construction Document Plans o One (1) Submittal to Client of the 90% Civil Engineering Construction Document package signed and stamped for Agency review §. 90% Construction Document Plans §. Draft CSI Specifications in MasterSpec format o One (1) Submittal to Client of 100% Civil Engineering Construction Document package for Building Permit re-submittal, signed and stamped addressing plan check comments §. 100% Construction Document Plans §. CSI Specifications in MasterSpec format o Issue (1) submittal of the Final Stormwater Control Plan
3.8 Bidding Support
Upon Agency approval of the 100% CD Set, the Civil Engineer will Bidding support. Anticipated scope of services to provide general support to the Client during the scheduled construction schedule include:
1. General Bidding process comment and written response support over a maximum four (4) week time period upon initiation.
3.9 Construction Administration
Upon agreement with the Client, the Civil Engineer will perform typical Construction Administration (CA) services during this phase of the project related to designs based on information available during final Construction Document submittal. Anticipated scope of services to provide general support to the Client during the scheduled construction schedule include:
1. Attend one (1) on site Pre-Construction Conference / Kick-off meeting 2. Attend up to twelve (12) site visits during construction for observation of general conformance to construction documents 3. Civil CA efforts in this phase include the following standard Civil Engineering services: 1. Review of civil related Submittals and Shop Drawings 2. RFI Response 3. Design Clarifications 4. Project Close-out walk through and Punch List 5. ‘As-Built’ Drawings and Specifications
The Civil Engineer will develop a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), file for the Notice of Intent (NOI), and setup the SMARTS Website with the State Water Resources Board (fee covered by client). This document (NPDES permit) is mandated by the State of California for any development greater than one acre of disturbance and enforced by the local municipality and the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). The Civil Engineer will conduct a limited amount of site visits and observations to determine that the Contractor is in general conformance of the SWPPP and corresponding permit. However, the Civil Engineer understands that it is the full responsibility of the Contractor to implement the SWPPP and Erosion Control Plan during the length of construction.
4. SWPPP Support a. SMARTS Site Setup and Coordination with Owner. b. One (1) Submittal of the SWPPP document and NOI. c. Two (2) hardcopies of the SWPPP document (1 for owner, 1 for contractor to maintain on project site) and an electronic copy of the SWPPP. d. Up to two (2) Site Visits and Site Observation Reports. e. Issue Erosion Control Plan updates to SWPPP as required per observation. f. Correspondence with the SWRCB regarding site specific conditions as necessary. g. Prepare and submit one (1) Annual Report (due September 1st of every year) to SMARTS Site h. Develop and prepare up to three (3) updates to the Master Erosion Control Plan for the SWPPP per construction document set issued for each milestone as shown in Exhibit A.
5.0 ASSUMPTIONS
The following items are to be provided by the Client prior to commencement of work:
§. Design will be based upon the Client’s approved site plan layout and provided to the Civil Engineer in AutoCAD. §. Design level Site Survey and all available line work of existing conditions in AutoCAD format. §. Available site utility information, record documents, existing engineering and utility analysis. §. Building finish floor elevations. §. Historical project information. §. Environmental Assessments Reports. §. Geotechnical Engineering Report. §. Arborist Reports.
6.0 EXCLUSIONS Consultant shall not be required to provide the following services.
1. Agency Fees 14. Utility demand engineering for electrical service, 2. Geotechnical Report gas services, telecommunication service, street 3. Legal Descriptions lights and sidewalk lights 4. Foundation/ Structural Design 15. Connection location for buildings by others; electric 5. Construction Staking Site Cleanup meter and gas meter layout by MEP consultant 6. Mitigation of contaminants resulting from unidentified 16. Site graphics leaking above ground or underground storage tanks 17. Traffic Engineering and Traffic Studies 7. Soils testing / remediation / removal 18. Engineering and documentation pertaining to the 8. Percolation tests SFPUC Water Line project impact 9. MEP Design Service 19. Surveying related work - Record Maps, Legal 10. Hazardous Waste Remediation Descriptions, Easement Descriptions, lot line 11. Materials Testing and Inspection reports. adjustments, ROW abandonment 12. O&M plans for Mechanical systems 20. Project phasing and design of temporary 13. Building Waterproofing – other than items in scope facilities 21. Alternative Water Systems design (rainwater or graywater) beyond Schematic Design phase
6.1 ADD ALTERNATATES :
The Civil Engineer will incorporate the Add Alternate elements into the design through the Schematic Design phase, beyond this point will be additional services to be approved by the Owner and Client. The following are anticipated Add Alternates to be considered part of the civil scope of work :
Sustainable Design : The project will consider alternative water management systems as part of the sustainable systems. This will include Stormwater landscape elements, water features, rainwater and graywater reuse items and alternative materials. The water management systems will also be considered in an effort to comply with Stormwater regulatory requirements.
SFPUC Water Line : It is understood that the current preferred Master Plan impacts and existing 36” diameter SFPUC transmission line. The work performed through the schematic design phase will be included in the base fees as defined in this scope document, work beyond this point will require additional services.
LEED and Living Building Challenge Design and Documentation : This project may pursue LEED or LBC certification. If this is a chosen path of the project, design and documentation related to the certification program will be considered additional services beyond the Schematic Design phase.
Rutherford + Chekene | Structural Engineering FIRM BIO
Rutherford + Chekene Civic + Local Experience
Established in 1960, Rutherford + Chekene (R+C) is one of California’s foremost engineering practices providing structural and geotechnical engineering. R+C’s staff of 70 provides cost- effective solutions that address unique project challenges rather than overdesign. We look at projects holistically and strive to work with the owner and the design team as a real partner to optimize each project.
In addition to our work at Stanford University for more than 30 years, R+C has served as structural engineer on many projects local to the San Mateo County area including work in Atherton.
Mills College Music Building Renovation Our portfolio includes the following:
• Design for civic centers and civic buildings within neighborhoods: Mountain View Civic Center, Santa Clara Central Park, Redwood City, Milpitas, Walnut Creek
• Historically sensitive structural solutions
• New design to fit with existing environments
• 20+ LEED Platinum and Gold buildings including those aiming for net zero
Schools of the Sacred Heart Retrofit, Atherton
Libraries for cities of Santa Clara, Walnut Creek, Milpitas
Stanford University Residential Renovations Stanford University Windhover Center RESUMES
With Rutherford + Chekene since 1988, Mr. Lizundia has 25 years of Bret Lizundia, SE experience in the structural design of office buildings, libraries, museums, Rutherford + Chekene other civic buildings; seismic evaluation and rehabilitation of existing Executive Principal (often buildings; peer review and plan checking; and applied research and guidelines development. He was the project manager and co-author of FEMA 547 Techniques for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. He received the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute’s prestigious Shah Family Innovation Prize and the H.J. Brunnier Award from the Structural Engineers Association of Northern California (SEAONC). Bret has worked with Bohlin Cywinski Jackson on UCSC’s Digital Arts Research Center and is currently serving as structural engineer for their team on UC Davis’ new art museum.
Project Role Project Experience Principal Project Engineer Frank Lloyd Wright Hanna House Rehabilitation, Palo Alto, CA—Bret Education led the structural team in this rehabilitation of a national landmark. Hanna M.S., Structural Engineering, House was Wright's first use of a hexagonal design module and one of his Stanford University, Stanford most sophisticated Usonian projects. R+C rehabilitated the building under B.S., Civil Engineering, the guiding principle that the restored house appear untouched. Stanford University, Stanford Stanford University Renovations, Stanford, CA—Bret has a long Registration history working on the Stanford campus on both new buildings and historic Registered Civil and Structural retrofits. His recent work includes renovations at several of the campuses Engineer, California existing and historic student houses including Roth House, Xanadu House, Bob House and Roble Hall. Stanford Windhover Contemplative Center, Stanford, CA—The design of a 4,000 sf contemplation center, a unique reinforced rammed earth building; the Windhover Contemplative Center will function as a destination site for refuge and reflection within the Stanford campus for students, faculty, staff, as well as the greater community. UC Berkeley Student Community Center and Lower Sproul Plaza Revitalization, Berkeley, CA—This addition of a new building and renovations to three existing buildings is part of a new student community center in the heart of UC Berkeley. The center includes space for student meetings, events, and performances as well as individual reflection. Bret is currently principal structural engineer. Other Relevant Projects • Menlo College Library, Menlo Park, CA • Stanford University Lathrop Library Renovation, Stanford, CA • Roseland University Prep Campus, Santa Rosa, CA • City of San Francisco Department of City Planning San Francisco Unreinforced Masonry Buildings Study, San Francisco, CA • UC Davis Jan Shrem and Maria Manetti Shrem Museum of Art, Davis, CA (with BCJ) • UCSC Digital Arts Research Center, Santa Cruz, CA (with BCJ) • UC Berkeley California Hall Basement Renovation, Berkeley, CA
SCOPE OF WORK
December 9, 2014
Steve Chaitow Principal Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 49 Geary Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94108 Email: [email protected]
P2014.347
Subject: ATHERTON CIVIC CENTER PROPOSAL FOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
Dear Steve:
Per your request, we are pleased to present our revised proposal to furnish professional services for the subject project. Our proposal is based on the Town of Atherton’s “Request for Proposals for Civic Center Design” and its associated attachments and appendices; the Town’s April 2014 Civic Center Master Plan; the Town’s 12/1/14 and 12/4/14 answers to questions as contained in the “Atherton Final QA” document; BCJ’s 11/20/14, 12/3/14, and 12/8/14 emails; and our 12/9/14 telephone call. The following provides our understanding of the project, our proposed scope of services, and our proposed fees. Revisions from our 12/4/14 proposal are in italics.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT
The Town of Atherton currently has a 4.4 acre site at 91 Ashfield Road that accommodates the original 1928 Town Hall, Administration/Policy Building, Library, and modular Community Services Building. The site is bounded by the Caltrain railroad tracks on the north, Fair Oaks Lane on the west, Maple Avenue on the east, and private residences on the south. The site is approximately a rectangle of about 1,040 feet in the east-west direction and an average of 250 feet in the north-south direction.
The Town plans to retain the Town Hall, but replace the other structures with a new two-story Police/City Administration Building of about 25,000 sf and a Library Building of about 9,000 sf. The new facilities will house a library, City Council chambers, the police department, town administrative offices, community development permit center, public works maintenance, multi- purpose/community rooms, and other amenities designed to facilitate community events and uses. The police station does not have jail cells; the Town will continue to use the County jail. The Caltrain station adjacent to the Civic Center will remain. Substantial site work is planned as shown in the Town’s Master Plan. Site layout and design of the Civic Center are to be consistent and compatible with Atherton’s rural, neighborhood residential character.
Structural | Geotechnical Engineers 55 Second Street Suite 600 | San Francisco CA 94105 | T 415 568 4400 | F 415 618 0684 | www.ruthchek.com December 9, 2014 Page 2
The Town’s construction cost budget estimates are $13.4M for the Police-City Administration Building, $5.5M for the Library Building, and $4.2M site work, for a total of $23.1M. With soft costs, the total budget estimate is $31.7M. Funding will come partly from Town funds and partly from private donations. Fundraising is underway to raise $20M in donations.
It is assumed that design will be in accordance with the 2013 California Building Code. As a police station is an essential facility, the Police/Administrative Building will be required to be a Risk Category IV structure with a Seismic Importance Factor of Ie = 1.5.
The schedule from the RFP has Master Planning and Programming from February to April 2015, Conceptual Design from March to June 2015, Schematic Design from June to August 2015, Design Development from August to December 2015, Construction Documents from December 2015 to May 2016, Bidding from May to June 2016, and Construction from June 2016 to February 2018.
The project will use a traditional design-bid-build project delivery method. It is not anticipated that a contractor will be brought on for preconstruction services. The Town will contract with a project management firm to serve as the Owner’s Representative and to provide independent cost estimates.
It is anticipated that a series of public meetings will be conducted in the early project phases.
The project also includes five add alternates as follows. The base scope of work includes development of each of these items through Schematic Design. It is assumed that the final project scope including the selected alternatives will be determined at the end of Schematic Design.
• Underground garage: This has a construction budget of $10.9M. It will be located under the Police/Administration Building and have approximately 42 parking spaces and possibly some police storage space. • Renovation of the existing Town Hall: This has a construction budget of $1.5M. How the Town Hall will be used in the future Civic Center remains to be determined. Based on the estimate in the RFP and 12/4/14 answers to questions, seismic strengthening is included in the renovation. • Sustainable design, including LEED-compliant design up to Platinum and/or Net Zero design: Details and features of the sustainable design alternate will be developed by the project team. Use of photovoltaic cells both on buildings and over parking stalls is one possible technique. The RFP estimate includes an allowance of $810K for photovoltaic cells. • Upgraded site amenities: This has a construction budget of $780K. Based on the estimate in the RFP, it includes improved vehicular and pedestrian paving materials, site signage, site furnishings, seat walls and trellises. December 9, 2014 Page 3
• Additional ballistic shielding: This has a construction budget of $77K.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Master Plan Review and Programming
Our scope of services for the Master Plan Review and Programming Phase includes the following tasks. Our assumed level of effort is provided in the attached task/hour breakdown.
1. Review of Available Information: We will review available information including the Town’s Master Plan documents, past studies, and geotechnical reports.
2. Project Meetings and Conference Calls: Bi-weekly meetings including consultants are assumed per the RFP, for a total of four meetings. It is assumed half will be in person and half will be by conference call.
3. Site Tour: We will participate in the initial site tour with the Architect and Town representatives. Participation in subsequent neighborhood tours is not included.
4. Budget and Building Program: We will provide comment on structural quantities assumed in the preliminary budget prepared by others and structural issues related to an updated building program.
5. It is assumed that all drawings in this phase will be by the Architect.
Conceptual Design Phase
Our scope of services for the Conceptual Design Phase includes the following tasks. Our assumed level of effort is provided in the attached task/hour breakdown.
1. Site Development: We will provide advice to the Architect on the structural aspects of preliminary site development plans.
2. Building Development: We will provide advice to the Architect on the structural aspects of preliminary building development plans.
3. Conceptual Design Alternatives: We will provide advice to the Architect on the structural aspects on up to six preliminary conceptual design alternatives.
4. Project Meetings and Conference Calls: Bi-weekly meetings including consultants are assumed per the RFP, for a total of four meetings. It is assumed half will be in person and half will be by conference call. Participation in public workshops and “neighborhood road shows” is not included. December 9, 2014 Page 4
5. Preferred Conceptual Designs: We will provide advice to the Architect on the structural aspects involved in reducing the preliminary conceptual design alternatives to up to two Preferred Conceptual Designs.
6. Final Concept Plan: We will provide advice to the Architect on the structural aspects involved in selecting the final Conceptual Design. We will provide a structural narrative describing proposed structural systems, criteria, and issues.
7. It is assumed that all drawings in this phase will be by the Architect.
Schematic Design through Construction Administration
Our Basic Scope of Services for the Schematic Design, Design Development, Construction Documents, Bidding, and Construction Administration (including close out) phases of the project is contained in the Scope of Basic Structural Service attachment. The Basic Scope includes the add alternates listed below through Schematic Design. In addition, per the RFP request, a breakdown of hours per phase is also attached.
Add Alternates
Our scope of services and assumptions for the Design Development through Construction Administration phases for the project add alternates are given below.
Underground Garage: We will provide structural design for the underground garage. Parking layout and architectural design services will be by others.
Sustainable Design: Sustainable design features that could be included in the project will be determined during the initial project design phases. We will participate in project team efforts to identify potential sustainable design elements. We have provided an allowance to cover additional design efforts for structural framing to support green roofs, photovoltaic cells, or solar thermal units on the building roofs and structures to support photovoltaic cells as part of parking shade structures. If other elements requiring structural design are included, these will be a separate additional service.
Renovation of Existing Town Hall: We have provided an allowance for structural design for renovating of the existing town hall. Given the building vintage and information in the RFP estimate, we assume a seismic evaluation and retrofit will be performed together with MEP and architectural upgrades. A preliminary seismic evaluation will be done during the Schematic Design phase, such as a Tier 1 evaluation per ASCE/SEI 41-13 Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings to identify potential seismic deficiencies. More detailed evaluation and retrofit design will be provided as part of the add alternate Design Development phase.
December 9, 2014 Page 5
Upgraded Site Amenities: Based on the estimate in the RFP, this includes improved vehicular and pedestrian paving materials, site signage, site furnishings, seat walls, and trellises. Paving design is assumed to be by others. Our Basic Scope of Services includes an allowance to provide advice to the landscape architect on structural issues related to site features but documentation is by others for these features. For the add alternate, an allowance is provided for additional consultation and to provide structural design of trellis features. Documentation and submittal review of other features will still be by others.
Additional Ballistic Shielding: We assume specification and any related design of additional ballistic shielding will be by others.
COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES
We propose to provide our services on a lump sum basis for the Basic Scope of Services for Master Plan Review and Programming through Construction Administration for $320,000. This includes the add alternates through Schematic Design. Our allocation by phase is per the following table. The table also provides our estimates for Design Development through Construction Administration for the add alternates and for reimbursables.
Structural Fee by Element and Phase
Base Scope Underground Sustainable Town Hall Upgraded Site Add'l Ballistic Total Fee by Phase Garage Design Renovation Amenities Shielding Phase Master Plan Review/Programming $11,000 NA NA NA NA NA $11,000 Conceptual Design $25,000 NA NA NA NA NA $25,000 Schematic Design $51,500 NA NA NA NA NA $51,500 Design Development $42,000 $24,000 $2,250 $7,500 $1,500 NA $77,250 Construction Documents $120,500 $68,800 $6,450 $18,000 $4,300 NA $218,050 Bidding $5,500 $3,200 $300 $1,000 $200 NA $10,200 Construction Administration $64,500 $36,800 $3,400 $15,000 $2,300 NA $122,000 Total Fee $320,000 $132,800 $12,400 $41,500 $8,300 NA $515,000 Reimbursable Expenses $2,000 $500 $0 $500 $0 NA $3,000
Additional details providing assumed staff hours per element and phase are provided in a attached spreadsheet.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Upon completion of successful negotiation and execution of a contract form acceptable to both parties, we will be pleased to commence performance of the professional services described in this proposal.
Atherton Civic Center SCOPE OF BASIC STRUCTURAL SERVICES Page 1
Scope of Basic Structural Services for Schematic Design through Construction Administration Phases
I. General .1 Scope includes the same professional services for the Structural Part of the Project, as the Architect is required to provide the Owner under the Prime Agreement. The Structural Part of the Project, for purpose of definition of the scope of full services, is limited to the Primary Structural System. The Primary Structural System includes structural floor and roof assemblies, structural frame, load- bearing walls, lateral force-resisting elements for seismic and wind resistance, elements to resist the action of earth pressure on the building, and foundations. The Primary Structural System does not include nonstructural elements, such as the exterior facade or secondary structural elements such as stairs.
Scope also includes limited structural services for nonstructural elements, as defined herein.
.2 BIM modeling of structural elements using REVIT will be performed on an ongoing basis during the progress of design to allow for detailed coordination and clash detection with the design team. Preparation of a more detailed model as required for other purposes is not included in this proposal, although it could be provided for an additional fee.
.3 Scope includes participation in project meetings, both in person and via teleconferencing. .1 Allow for one 2-hour bi-weekly meeting during design. .2 Construction Phase: Refer to Construction Administration Services.
.4 Scope includes participation in value engineering sessions and lean processes that may be required during each phase of the Project to adhere to budget and schedule.
.5 Scope includes participation in discussions regarding delivery method for the various structural and nonstructural components of the buildings, including. .1 Delivery method for shoring systems, where components become part of the permanent earth retention system. .2 Delivery method for nonstructural components, including facade. .3 Use of Design Assist for specialty elements of structural system, including precast concrete components, structural glass, etc.
.6 Scope includes participation in meetings to establish schedule of packages for agency review, pricing, and construction.
.7 Scope includes review of cost estimates prepared by others. Review will be for quantities of structural materials.
II. Schematic Design Phase
.1 Review available reports and studies that have been prepared for the project, including but not limited to geotechnical reports.
Atherton Civic Center SCOPE OF BASIC STRUCTURAL SERVICES Page 2
.1 Prepare written scope for additional geotechnical information required for project. .2 Assess the need for additional studies that may be required, such as wind tunnel tests or vibration studies, if conditions requiring those studies are identified.
.2 Establish structural design criteria for structure. .1 Review design criteria documents prepared to date. .2 Attend meetings with representatives of regulatory agency as necessary to obtain approval of Alternate Methods of Compliance criteria that might be proposed for use on the project.
.3 Perform a critical review of structural systems proposed for use.
.4 Prepare Schematic Structural Design documents including: .1 Preliminary foundation plans showing the types and approximate sizes of foundation elements. .2 Preliminary floor and roof framing plans, indicating typical framing member sizes and configurations. .3 Prepare outline specifications. .4 A 60% submittal and final submittal are included.
III. Design Development Phase
.1 Prepare design development documents for one selected structural scheme, including the following: .1 Foundation drawings. .2 Floor and roof framing plans and frame elevations indicating member sizes. .3 Typical details. .4 Draft structural specifications. .5 A 50% check set and 100% submittal are included.
.2 Complete structural analysis for primary structural systems, and foundations, sufficient for sizing of components and peer review.
.3 Prepare detailed structural design criteria for elements to be designed using Design/Assist delivery method.
.4 Prepare structural performance specification for temporary earth retention structures. Prepare construction documents for elements, such as tiebacks, that are intended to be incorporated into the permanent ground retention system.
.5 Provide advice to the Architect and specialty facade contractor on the structural issues related to developing a system for jointing and attachment and of the facade to accommodate seismic movement. Prepare structural portion of design criteria, including expected seismic movements.
.6 Provide advice to the Architect regarding preliminary design and member sizing for nonstructural architectural elements, including stair framing and railings.
Atherton Civic Center SCOPE OF BASIC STRUCTURAL SERVICES Page 3
IV. Construction Documents Phase
.1 Develop completed structural plans, specifications and calculations, suitable for building permit and construction. .1 Package documents as necessary for agency review and construction. .2 A 50% and 90% check set and 100% submittal are included.
.2 Coordinate structural elements, designed using Design Assist process, with structure. Review elements for conformance with design criteria and project intent. Participate in coordination of architectural and MEP features with structural components designed by Design Assist delivery.
.3 Review facade design, designed using Design Assist process for reactions to structure, for methods of attachment to the structure, and for conformance with design criteria for accommodating seismic movement. Our services related to cladding specifically exclude any design responsibility for any issues related to water-tightness or durability of the system. The specifications will require that the Contractor’s Specialty Engineer be appropriately licensed and take full responsibility for the design.
.4 Provide advice to the Architect in the final design of nonstructural elements requiring structural input, including stair framing, railings, partial height partitions, folding partitions, and roll-up doors. Advice will include consultation, computations, preparation of sketches, and review and comment on structural criteria in specifications. It is assumed that documentation and submittal review will be by the Architect except as follows. .1 Prepare structural drawings for stairs and connections to structure, where stairs are designed by Architect. .2 Prepare drawings for miscellaneous steel framing necessary for support and bracing of partial height partitions, folding partitions, and roll-up doors.
.5 Design and detail structure surrounding elevators including structure required to brace guiderails based on loading information provided by vertical transportation consultant or elevator manufacturer. Calculations and design for brackets, attachments, sheave beams etc. normally provided by the system manufacturer will be specified for design by the Contractor's Specialty Engineer. We will review the design and details only for reactions to be resisted by the structure designed by us.
.6 Provide curbs, pads and dunnage for support of major mechanical equipment. Assist MEP engineers in preparation of structural design criteria for specification of seismic bracing and anchorage of equipment and distribution systems. Review structure for adequacy to support loads imposed by MEP systems. Design of anchorage and bracing details for MEP equipment and distribution systems is assumed to be by the MEP consultant.
.7 Respond to regulatory agency plan review comments.
.8 R+C’s BIM model is created exclusively for use with the production and coordination of contract documents with the Architect. We will furnish the BIM model used in design for clash detection to Contractor at Owner/Architect's option. Where the BIM model conflicts with the Contract Documents, the contract documents shall take precedence. It is assumed that the Contractor will make any necessary modifications to the design model and will maintain and update the BIM model during construction.
Atherton Civic Center SCOPE OF BASIC STRUCTURAL SERVICES Page 4
V. Bidding Phase
.1 Interpret contract documents in response to bid questions.
.2 Prepare bid addenda to clarify contract documents.
VI. Construction Administration Phase
.1 Provide construction administration services over construction schedule.
.2 Prepare testing and inspection plan. Participate in selection of Testing Agency. Review testing and inspection reports prepared by Owner's Testing Agency.
.3 Assist the Architect in determining whether Work is acceptable.
.4 Perform review of submittals for all components of the Primary Structural System. It is assumed that submittals will be reviewed electronically.
.5 Perform review of architectural components for conformance with structural design criteria and structural details prepared by R+C. Review for reactions to structure.
.6 Provide interpretations and clarifications to Contract Documents, as requested by the Architect
.7 Presence on site: It is anticipated that persons will be on site during the construction period for structural work to: .1 Provide Structural Observation of the work in conformance with requirements of California Building Code. .2 Attend preconstruction conferences and meetings to resolve structural issues. .3 Periodically review structural aspects of mockups and work in progress. It is anticipated that 10 site visits will be required. Attendance at the weekly project meeting is excluded.
.8 Final punch list.
.9 Preparation of structural record documents in AutoCAD format incorporating Contractor's as-built markups.
.1 Revision of BIM/Revit structural model to reflect changes made during construction is not included in basic services but can be provided as an additional service.
VII. Supplemental Basic Structural Engineering Services The following services are included as part of Basic Structural Engineering Services
.1 Attendance at one public workshop during Schematic Design.
VIII. Additional Services The following services are excluded from Basic Structural Engineering Services, but may be provided as additional services:
.1 Design of subdrainage systems.
Atherton Civic Center SCOPE OF BASIC STRUCTURAL SERVICES Page 5
.2 Design of temporary earth retention systems for excavations, except components of system that form part of the permanent earth retention system.
.3 Design of temporary shoring for erection of the building.
.4 Design of exterior cladding systems, except to assist in establishing jointing and anchorage system and attachment points. Basic services include the design of structural components to support reactions from facade and review of cladding design for general conformance with structural design criteria.
.5 Structural design of secondary stairs that are intended for emergency egress. Structural design of architect-designed stairs is included.
.6 Design of catwalks and fall protection systems. Basic Services include the design of structural framing to support reactions from these systems and verification of reactions.
.7 Design of skylights, except main framing.
.8 Design of window washing systems, except provision of support for bases of davits or cranes.
.9 Documentation and submittal review of site landscape features, including paving, fountains, planters, landscape walls, screen walls, fences, gates, and trellises, is not included in our basic services. An allowance of 40 hours is provided in our basic services to provide advice to the landscape architect on structural issues related to site features, such as reinforcing of concrete elements or sizing of railing members or light pole foundation sizing and anchorage. Basic services include design of retaining walls necessary for buildings, including walls flanking loading docks and entries to subterranean parking.
.10 Design of structures for temporary support of mockups.
.11 Response history analyses.
.12 Design of seismic (base) isolation.
.13 Performance-based design and nonlinear analysis.
.14 Civil or geotechnical engineering services.
.15 Preparation of multiple bid packages. It is assumed that there will be a single bid package.
.16 Anchorage of Owner-supplied equipment, or other equipment not detailed in the Construction Documents.
.17 Developing seismic qualification for mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems.
.18 Response to outside structural or seismic peer review comments. It is assumed that there will not be an independent structural/seismic peer reviewer.
.19 Nonstructural seismic coordinator: For essential facilities that desire enhanced reliability of seismic performance of nonstructural components, we recommend that a Nonstructural Seismic Coordinator (NSC) be identified. The coordinator should be a construction professional that is knowledgeable in the seismic protection of nonstructural components. The NSC may be an employee of the Town, the
Atherton Civic Center SCOPE OF BASIC STRUCTURAL SERVICES Page 6
Architect or one of their consultants, or a third party. Working closely with personnel responsible for emergency operations, the NSC should designate equipment critical to continued building function, such that it requires certification in accordance with Section 13.2.2 of ASCE 7 and Section 1705.12 of the CBC. For equipment that is so designated, the NSC should determine that qualified equipment is available. The NSC should review the construction documents to ensure that they contain provisions for anchorage and bracing of nonstructural components that are clear, coordinated and practical to implement. The NSC should monitor the project during construction to determine that seismic protection requirements are being implemented. Observation shall satisfy the Special Inspection requirements of CBC Section 17011.6. Performing the duties of the NSC is outside of the basic scope of services of Rutherford + Chekene.
Integral Group | MEP + Sustainability FIRM BIO
About Integral Group Integral Group is an interactive global network of design professionals collaborating under a single deep green engineering umbrella. We provide a full range of building system design and energy analysis services, with a staff widely regarded as innovative leaders in their fields. Located in eight offices across North America, along with an international network of affiliates, our passion for sustainable design runs deep. Our organization is designed to specifically meet the challenge of accelerating critical change in sustainable building practices. Our integrated approach to building systems design allows us to enhance opportunities that nature provides, working in harmony with a building’s environment to reduce its reliance on outside energy sources. We specialize in the design of simple, elegant, cost-effective systems for high performance building environments and provide comprehensive analyses that help prioritize their energy saving potential and carbon reduction effect. Services Integral Group is an internationally recognized leader in building systems design and energy analysis to deliver energy efficient buildings. We offer a wide range of services to deliver high-performance building environments that redefine what is possible. Using an integrated approach, we design healthy living, breathing building systems that are comfortable, energy efficient and practical.
• Mechanical • Performance Engineering • Electrical • Building and Energy Analysis • Lighting • LEED and Sustainability Consulting • Refrigeration • Commissioning Deep Green Engineering We are a team of local leaders with global voices and a passion for deep green engineering solutions. From concept and design through performance, we specialize in elegant systems for high performance buildings. How We are Different Our design approach differs dramatically from traditional MEP engineering firms - unlike our competitors, we focus exclusively on high performance and 31 high efficiency projects to deliver value to our customers. An innovative leader LEED Platinum in building MEP systems design, Integral Group designed the first zero carbon, Certified zero energy commercial building in the United States, first laboratory with chilled Net Zero45 26 Projects in beams, first laboratory to use radiant ceiling panel cooling, first net zero energy, LEED Design zero carbon and LEED Platinum laboratory, first LEED Platinum rating for a Gold laboratory in a historic building, first campus fuel cell installation, first LEED Gold Certified 8 microchip manufacturing plant, first pre-certified LEED Platinum data center, and Living Building first LEED Platinum office building in Canada. Challenge in Design
Breaking Through the Cost Barrier The barriers we encounter to sustainable strategies in our projects are frequently those of actual or perceived cost premium for additional “green features.” Our experience in many projects has taught us to find a way to break through these cost barriers and make sustainable buildings affordable. We have a long track record with affordable sustainability: the MEP systems for all of our LEED Platinum buildings were delivered with no additional cost.
www.integralgroup.com RESUMES
Integral Group
Tyler Bradshaw, P.E., LEED AP BD+C Principal, Mechanical Engineer
Tyler serves as Principal at Integral Group, where he manages the Education, EDUCATION Corporate & Civic (ECC) design team. He is an industry expert in innovative energy • Bachelor of Science, Mechanical Engineering, efficient strategies and specializes in LEED Platinum and net zero mechanical San Diego State University system designs, which feature more envelope intensive analysis to reduce loads and • University of California, Berkeley Extension innovative building systems technologies to meet those loads such as radiant floor HVAC&R Certificate Program systems, chilled beams, thermal energy storage and ground source heat pumps.
Tyler has overseen the design and completion of twelve LEED Platinum projects PROFESSIONAL DESIGNATIONS/MEMBERSHIPS and his team has nearly this many currently in design. His team has also produced • Mechanical Engineer, CA License #M33496, WA several industry firsts such as the highest scoring LEED-CI Platinum (102 credits), License #50311 • LEED Accredited Professional, BD+C world’s first certified net zero energy project, and the nation’s first LEED-NC v2.2 • Board Member, ASHRAE Golden Gate Chapter Platinum renovation. Tyler consistently pushes himself to deliver the lowest energy • Seminar Committee, 2009-2011, ASHRAE buildings possible for his clients, challenging “rules of thumb” and design constraints. Golden Gate Chapter • Association of Energy Engineers • USGBC Northern California Chapter
KEY PROJECTS | Civic + Community Roosevelt Community Center Fort Mason Tier 2 Cowell Theater and San Jose, CA Herbst Pavillion Renovations LEED Gold Certified San Francisco, CA
Rose Garden Library Watsonville Water Resource Center San Jose, CA Watsonville, CA LEED Gold Certified Net Zero Energy, LEED Platinum Certified
81st. Avenue Public Library Exploratorium Oakland, CA San Francisco, CA LEED Gold Certified LEED Platinum Certified, Zero Carbon, Zero Energy Starbird Teen Center San Jose, CA StopWaste.org Headquarters LEED Silver Certified Oakland, CA LEED Platinum Certified Oakland Museum of California Oakland, CA 140 New Montgomery Historic LEED Silver Certified Renovation San Francisco, CA City of Palo Alto Cubberly Community LEED Gold Certified Center Boiler Replacement Palo Alto, CA David Brower Center Berkeley, CA San Jose Environmental Innovation Center LEED Platinum Certified San Jose, CA LEED Platinum Target
* Resume encompasses experience prior to joining Integral Group
www.integralgroup.com SCOPE OF WORK
BASIC SEVICES SCOPE OF WORK
BASIC SERVICES – MASTER PLAN REVIEW + PROGRAMMING
We will assist the architectural and site design team members by participating in an initial site visit and reporting back on MEP related issues that would affect the master plan and programming development. We will also participate in a neighborhood tour to gain a better understanding of the surrounding neighborhoods. We will also provide additional feedback on alternates presented or new alternates that result from initial MP and programming discussions.
Meetings: - Participation with initial site tour and neighborhood tour Deliverables: - Written review comments architects MP and programming early draft documents - Written review comments architects MP and programming last draft documents
BASIC SERVICES – CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
We will review any programming documents prepared by the Architect and comment on the project plans, goals and parameters in respect to energy and water efficient design strategies. We will participate in a design charrette that includes members of the project team. The objectives of the charrette are to: explore possible design solutions; propose alternatives; assess the project’s potential for obtaining LEED Silver Certification; more closely identify the type and extent of required energy modeling; and to secure agreement with the Owner on energy and water efficient design strategies for the building. Meetings: - Participation in one half-day design charrette or public workshop Deliverables: - Technical review comments on Architect’s Programming project plans - Conceptual Design Narrative
BASIC SERVICES – SCHEMATIC DESIGN
We will work with Owner and Architects on the development of the Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing design (MEP) concepts for the building. We will prepare a written Schematic Design Narrative document that outlines these concepts. This document will be reviewed and commented on by Owner, Architects, and other applicable team members. Design team comments will be incorporated into a revision that will be submitted to the Owner and Architects for final written approval. The Schematic Design Narrative will contain enough detail on the major technical MEP systems to assist in preparing a preliminary cost estimate. We will prepare a preliminary air flow diagram; preliminary equipment schedule; drawings showing main duct runs for the building; and a single line electrical diagram for the main power distribution system. Owner will provide written approval of the Schematic Design Narrative before work on Design Development begins.
Meetings: - Up to 3 meetings in Architects offices Deliverables: - Schematic Design Narrative document - Schematic Drawings including preliminary equipment schedule - Summary of Energy Use of Proposed Building
Scope of Services Atherton Civic Center Project Page 4 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson
BASIC SERVICES – DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
In this phase, we will provide coordination with Owner, Architects and other engineering disciplines; select the major equipment that will be required; and prepare a preliminary specification document. The drawings provided in this task will include equipment selection, sizing and location, outside air intakes, and size and locations of exhaust outlets. They will also include electrical design items such as electrical distribution and the power monitoring system. Enough detail will be provided in these documents to provide a second preliminary cost estimate. Meetings: - Up to 3 meetings in Architects offices Deliverables: - 50% DD Drawings with equipment schedules, sizes and locations - 100% DD Drawings with equipment schedules, sizes and locations
BASIC SERVICES – CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
Once the DD drawings have been reviewed and commented on, we will begin preparing construction drawings. During this stage, the specifications will be refined further. We will present the 50% drawings and specifications to the design team and the Owner for review and comment. A single revision of the 90% drawings will be prepared in order to finalize the drawings for permit. Once the permit comments have been received, one more revision of the documents will be prepared for the final bid/construction documents. We will also review contractor bids as required. Meetings: - Up to 4 meetings in Architects offices Deliverables: - 50% CD drawings and specifications - 90% drawings and specifications for review - Final Permit Drawings - Bid/Construction Drawings and Specifications - Utility Energy report - Title 24 compliance forms
BASIC SERVICES – BID PHASE SERVICES
To support that the Bid phase proceeds smoothly and equitably, we will be available to answer questions on the bid package from prospective Bidders. We will provide scope clarifications and general requirements for MEP items to Bidders for inclusion in the bid documents. We will assist the Architect in pre-qualifying subcontractors and suppliers, attend pre-bid meetings, provide analysis of bids, assist in interviewing subcontractors, and make award recommendations to the client. Meetings: - 1 pre bid meeting Deliverables: - RFI Reponses - Scope clarifications - Bid Analysis and Comments - Award Recommendations
BASIC SERVICES – CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
To support that the design intent prescribed by the Construction Drawings and Specifications is realized in the final building, we will perform Construction Administration services. We will be responsive to and available for contractor questions, ensuring an on-schedule and in-budget construction process. We will assist during the construction phase by:
Scope of Services Atherton Civic Center Project Page 5 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson
• Reviewing contractor submittals in detail • Responding to RFIs • Visiting the construction site • Participating in up to three scheduled coordination meetings • Developing a project closeout punch list
Meetings: - Up to 6 visits to the project site Deliverables: - RFI Reponses - Submittal responses - Punch list of deficient items
ALT – UNDERGROUND GARAGE
We will include Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing design services for an underground garage of roughly 24,000 GSF in size. This includes all power, underground plumbing, podium/area drainage, mechanical ventilation in all deliverables listed in basic services above. Meetings: - Meetings already included in basic services Deliverables: - Deliverables already included in basic services
ALT – SUSTAINABLE DESIGN
In addition to the LEED Silver certification indicated in a separate Alternate below, we will additional energy modeling and sustainability consulting services to help the project achieve deeper and more substantial sustainability goals beyond LEED Silver certification. We will start this scope by participating in and co-administering a half/full day in conjunction with BCJ to help identify the specific sustainability goals that are to be studied for this project. These goals might include for example achieving LEED Platinum, Net Zero Energy/electricity, Well Building Standard, or Living Building Certification. Meetings: - Up to 6 additional meetings beyond those already included in basic services including a full day charette Deliverables: - Energy reports at Concept, SD, DD, CD phases targeting studies of design features and Energy Usage Intensity (EUI) tracking and reduction strategies
ALT – TOWN HALL RENNOVATION/REUSE
We will study the existing town hall and work with BCJ to evaluate the feasibility of reusing the existing town hall and include MEP design services for renovation work anywhere from selected/targets upgrades up to a “full gut” remodel to the building. We will review all as-built documents shared with the design team, preferable at least 1 week before the site visit is performed. Meetings: - Initial site visit to evaluate and document existing MEP that can be easily visually inspected on site Deliverables: - Deliverables already included in basic services
ALT – UPGRADED SITE AMENITIES
We will include site electrical design services for all basic services listed above for this expanded/upgraded site amenities scope. We do not anticipate any mechanical or plumbing scope associated with this but will include coordination of base building(s) M&P services that may be required for this scope alternate. Meetings: - Meetings already included in basic services
Scope of Services Atherton Civic Center Project Page 6 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson
Deliverables: - Deliverables already included in basic services
ALT – DAYLIGHTING MODELING
We will be able to perform a Daylight Autonomy (DA) analysis. DA is a dynamic daylight metric and quantifies daylight availability throughout the year. We will update our assessment of daylight availability and lighting energy impact and issue a Daylight Autonomy report. In concert with Daylight Autonomy we will also analyze Useful Daylight Illuminance (UDI) to stay within acceptable light levels and contrast ratios. We will prepare full building design for daylight simulations. Daylight Autonomy, & Useful Daylight Illuminance will guide the design decision making process towards solution that optimize daylight harvesting and reduce the reliance on artificial electric lighting during daytime hours. Meetings: - Meetings already included in basic services Deliverables: - Daylight Autonomy Report
ALT – PHOTOVOLTAIC DESIGN
We will include full MEP design services for a building and/or parking canopy photovoltaic system of any size up to 25% greater than the project’s expected total annual electricity usage making it possible for this project to achieve Net Zero Energy and/or Net Zero electricity. This will include an initial site visit to determine the available solar resources and potential for detrimental shading based on present surrounding solar (shading) obstacles. Meetings: - Site visit to determine solar resources for proposed PV location(s) Deliverables: - Deliverables already included in basic services
ALT – COMPOSTING TOILETS
We will incorporate design for up to (4) composting toilets into one of the buildings within our current scope. These would most likely be a single stall option in a “gang restroom” arrangement and be a foam flush model but this scope includes design of a pit style and/or outdoor public restroom if so desired by the city. Meetings: - Meetings already included in basic services Deliverables: - Deliverables already included in basic services
ALT – LEED DOCUMENTATION
We will prepare the documentation of points for items in which our team plays a primary role in designing. The majority of points that we document will be in the Water, Energy and Atmosphere, and Indoor Environmental Quality categories. We will be responsible for the Lighting related points in the Sites category. We have assumed that this project will target a minimum of LEED Silver level and will be submitted for certification to the USGBC under LEED 3.0. If Measurement and Verification (M&V) is pursued, the M&V plan is included in this task, but the M&V report is excluded. Comfort modeling and ventilation effectiveness calculations are also excluded. Deliverables: - LEED documentation for MEP related points
ALT – LEED FUNDAMENTAL COMMISSIONING (Cx)
We will conduct fundamental commissioning, as specified by the LEED v3.0 rating system, of the mechanical and electrical systems of the building. Commissioning will be done in accordance with PECI and ASHRAE guidelines and will result in a more reliable, efficient and much safer HVAC system. We will prepare commissioning specifications and a commissioning plan in the
Scope of Services Atherton Civic Center Project Page 7 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson
CD phase and include it as part of the bid package so that the controls and mechanical contractors include the cost of participating in the commissioning in their price. At the end of the commissioning we will prepare a report and review the results with Architect and Owner. Components of the commissioning are: BASIC COMMISSIONING ASSUMPTIONS
• Systems to be commissioned: HVAC and HVAC direct digital controls, lighting, domestic hot water, renewable energy • All pre-functional tests will be performed by construction contractor • After functional tests are performed and a list of problems is provided to the General Contractor, Integral Group will return only once to the site to verify fixes on outstanding items. Subsequent site visits, if required, will be billed on a T&M basis by the General Contractor.
SUB TASK 1: COMMISSIONING PLAN
• Brief overview of the commissioning process • A list of all commissioned features and systems • Identification of the primary commissioning participants and their responsibilities • A description of the management, communication and reporting of the commissioning Plan • Outline of the commissioning process: o Installation Checks o Testing o Commissioning Report o Any warranty period activities
SUB TASK 2: COMMISSIONING AND COMMISSIONING REPORT
• Review and summary of design intent and owner’s project requirements • Verification design operation meets intent • List of design modifications and compromises • Verification that construction is to project specifications • Insurance of proper installation of components • Functional performance test results • Any outstanding commissioning issues or system deficiencies that remain to be corrected • Appendix including all complete functional tests
Deliverables: - Commissioning Plan - Commissioning Specifications - Issues Log - Commissioning Report
ALT – LEED ENHANCED COMMISSIONING (Cx)
The purpose of enhanced commissioning is to begin the commissioning process early during the design process and execute additional activities after systems performance verification is completed. Integral Group Inc. will act as an independent commissioning authority to implement the following enhanced commissioning process activities in addition to the requirements of EA Prerequisite 1 and in accordance with the LEED-NC 3.0 Reference Guide. We will seek the assistance of other firms as needed to perform third-party reviews of design documentation and contractor submittals:
• Lead, review, and oversee the completion of all commissioning process activities. We shall report results, finding and recommendations directly to the Owner.
Scope of Services Atherton Civic Center Project Page 8 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson
• Conduct one commissioning design review of the Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR), Basis of Design (BOD), and design documents prior to mid-construction documents phase and back-check the review comments in the subsequent design submission.
• Review contractor submittals applicable to systems being commissioned for compliance with the OPR and BOD. This review shall be concurrent with A/E reviews and submitted to the design team and the Owner.
• Develop a system manual that provides future operating staff the information needed to understand and optimally operate the commissioned systems.
• Verify that the requirements for training operating personnel and building occupants are completed.
• Review of Operation and Maintenance (O&M) documentation for adequacy and completeness.
• Review building operation within 10 months after substantial completion with O&M staff and occupants, and develop a plan for resolution of outstanding commissioning-related issues.
Meetings: - 1 meeting with design team members to perform commissioning design review of OPR, BOD and design documents before 50% CD Deliverables: - Design review in early CD phase - Review of Contractor Submittals - Systems Manual - Plan for resolution of outstanding issues at 10 month post-occupancy
ALT – RECLAIMED RAINWATER
We will include full MEP design services for an onsite rain water system including water balance calculations, cistern, filtration, treatment, and reuse parallel piping to sources determined jointly with owner/IG/BCJ. These sources typically include toilets, urinals, landscaping, cooling towers, etc.. Most of the water for these systems these systems will come from building roofs by may include some surface runoff from one or more locations on our site. Meetings: - Meetings already included in basic services Deliverables: - Deliverables already included in basic services
ALT – RECLAIMED GREY WATER
We will include full MEP design services for an onsite grey water system including water balance calculations, cistern, filtration, treatment, and reuse parallel piping to sources determined jointly with owner/IG/BCJ. These sources typically include toilets, urinals, landscaping, etc.. Most of the water for these systems these systems will come from large grey water resources within the building programming such as showers and laundry for the police station. Meetings: - Meetings already included in basic services Deliverables: - Deliverables already included in basic services
ALT – RECLAIMED BLACK WATER (SEWAGE)
We will include full MEP design services for an onsite black water (sewage) system including water balance calculations, cistern, filtration, treatment, and reuse parallel piping to plumbing fixtures and water demands determined jointly with owner/IG/BCJ.
Scope of Services Atherton Civic Center Project Page 9 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson
These water demands typically include toilets, urinals, landscaping, etc.. This scope does not include design of a bio-methane capture and reuse system but this can added as an additional service at a later date. Meetings: - Meetings already included in basic services Deliverables: - Deliverables already included in basic services
ASSUMPTIONS, INCLUSIONS, AND EXCLUSIONS
ASSUMPTIONS
• Integral Group, with the key energy analysis and design responsibilities, will receive 75% of any "Design Team" incentive offered by local utilities • LEED NC Silver certification will be sought as part of the basic services • Architect will retain acoustical consultants separately • Architect will provide as-built drawings of existing buildings in digital format • Water supply to be furnished for the Project will be capable of supporting new sprinkler demands without the use of a fire pump • Project design and construction schedule as listed in the Mack5 schedule listed in the project RFP page 9. • The project will be commissioned either by Integral Group or a third party commissioning agent.
INCLUDED (** INDICATES SCOPE THAT IS INCLUDED ONLY AS WITHIN ONE OR MORE ALTERNATES ABOVE) General • Coordination with landscape architect and civil engineer for site-related MEP requirements • Providing CAD documents formatted in AutoCAD 2010 or latest version of Revit • Coordination of systems design with all consultants on project team
Mechanical & Plumbing • Heating systems • Ventilation Systems • Cooling Systems • Bathroom exhaust systems • Domestic hot and cold water and wastewater systems • Rain/Grey/Black water treatment & reuse systems** • Composting toilets**
LEED and Energy Modeling • Calculations or written documents in support of LEED documentation • Modeling for LEED documentation • Coordination of energy rebates with local utility for Owner and Design Team • LEED Fundamental Commissioning** • LEED Enhanced Commissioning** • Documentation of MEP related LEED points** • Title 24 Energy Documentation** • All energy simulation modeling such as DOE2 modeling • M&V Plan if M&V is pursued under LEED**
Electrical • Electrical Power Distribution
Scope of Services Atherton Civic Center Project Page 10 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson
• Lighting circuiting and Controls • Commissioning lighting system controls** • Limited exterior lighting circuiting and controls • Interior and Exterior Title 24 Compliance lighting calculations • Low voltage fire detection and alarm system • Photovoltaic systems** • Daylighting design and daylighting harvesting controls** • Daylighting modeling or calculations** • Coordination of new electrical, telephone and CATV services infrastructure • Telecommunication distribution (raceways only) • CATV distribution (raceways only) • Security/intercom/access System
Fire Protection • Design /Build Specifications
EXCLUDED (++INDICATES SERVICES THAT CAN BE PROVIDED AS AN ADDITIONAL SERVICE UPON REQUEST) General • Work on buildings other than those described under ‘Buildings and Areas” above • Design of systems outside of five feet from building or buildings described under ‘Buildings and Areas” above, except for site related work as included above • Construction management or bidding coordination • Design or specification of any kitchen equipment • Cost estimating • Acoustical Consulting • Demolition drawings++ • Smoke modeling • Any work on atriums++ • Documentation of existing as-built conditions • Supervision of contractors • Record drawings of completed project
Mechanical & Plumbing • Routing of utilities (gas, water, sanitary, etc.) outside of five feet from the building • Perimeter drainage or foundation drainage systems • Trenching and backfilling specifications related to underground piping and/or tanks
LEED • Submission of LEED documents for non MEP related points++ • Measurement & Verification report++ • Comfort modeling++ • Ventilation effectiveness calculations++
Electrical, Telecom & Data • Commissioning of any systems except as indicated above++ • Lighting Design++ • Cogeneration systems++; surveillance systems++ • Cabling for telephone or CATV
Scope of Services Atherton Civic Center Project Page 11 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson
• Design of new electrical service, including raceways and pads++
Fire Protection • Full design of fire protection for all buildings on site • Testing of fire protection systems
Scope of Services Atherton Civic Center Project Page 12 Bohlin Cywinski Jackson
Niteo | Lighting FIRM BIO
niteō (verb) 1) to shine, glitter, look bright 2) to bloom, thrive
Niteo offers a fresh perspective on lighting design.
e aim to engage clients in an intimate, tech savvy dialogue that empowers project stakeholders. e believe that our success is built on knowledgeable clients that actively contribute to the design process. t is through these relationships that we are able to capture the imagination of our clientele.
n doing so, we accept the challenge of working within de ned budgets and delivering a speci cation that can be built and maintained thereafter.
hen pursuing uncommon or unprecedented design opportunities, Niteo relies on visual media and computational analysis to convey concepts. he knowledge we have accrued over a combined years of lighting design experiences affords us the ability to execute these designs with exceptional results.
Niteo has situated its o ces in Silicon alley and San Francisco to gain rst hand access to the most innovative lighting technologies in the world.
e look forward to collaborating with you.
* projects by Jason Edling or Key Anderson prior to forming Niteo RESUMES
e nderson IALD LEED AP
ey s diversi ed approach and tenacity enables an anything is possi ble environment that s backed by a strong sense of design, along with the modern detailing, construction and procurement methods needed the continue designing landmark projects. eginning his career with years in Northern California, and later working from New ork, Singa pore okyo, he has ongoing and built projects around the world. His range of works includes master planning and civic projects, museums, corporate head uarters, mixed use and urban design, light artist installations, hospitality and healthcare.
(select design experience prior to Niteo Lighting, LLC)
civic Newport Beach City Hall Newport Beach, CA Marina One Development and Masterplan Singapore Kurilpa Bridge Brisbane, Australia u lic Sa et Building orthern Cali ornia Con dential Songdo IBD Lighting Masterplan Incheon, South Korea experience Bruggemeyer Memorial Library Monterey Park, CA L , nc (1999-2004) cor orate + head uarters anks amos (2004-2006) Senior Designer Con dential Glo al Social edia Head uarters San Francisco, CA Bugatti Offices, etail Sho roo s Bei ing, China Arup Lighting (2006-2013) Office enant pro e ent enlo ar , CA Singapore Practice Leader Google nc Head uarters ountain ie , CA L A okyo (2013) Disney Grand Central Campus 3 Glendale, CA Associate, International Practice Saigon Centre Offices i ed use Ho Chi inh Cit , ietna Niteo (2013-present) education Managing Partner Stanford Graduate School of Business Stanford, CA UCLA Student Center Los Angeles, CA education CCSF Chinatown Campus San Francisco, CA BS Architectural Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder museum + exhibit + arts DeYoung Museum San Francisco, CA affiliations California Academy of Sciences* San Francisco, CA IALD Professional Member Tampa Museum Tampa, FL LEED AP Mint Museum San Francisco, CA Miami Art Museum Miami, FL Miami Science Museum Miami, FL Asian Civilizations Museum Singapore Future Memories Pavilion Singapore Light Artist Exhibitor: “UP! and Away”* Sydney, Singapore, London, York hos italit Franciscan Hospitality Center St. Helena, CA Vineyard 29 Winery St. Helena, CA
A arded ro ect
* projects by Jason Edling or Key Anderson prior to forming Niteo Jason Edling IALD LEED AP
Jason started Niteo Lighting, LLC to offer focused, technically savvy, lighting design services to architects and project stakeholders.
His collaborative approach empowers others to collectively take part in the process of realizing exceptional lighting solutions. Jason is driven to deliver visual experiences tailored to the aspirations of clientele.
(select project prior to founding Niteo Lighting, LLC)
civic Newport Beach City Hall (w/ BCJ) Newport Beach, CA Sacramento International Airport * Sacramento, CA Doyle Drive Replacement (bespoke pole design) San Francisco, CA museums + exhibits + arts California Academy of Sciences San Francisco, CA experience DeYoung Museum San Francisco, CA Schuler Shook (1998) DeYoung Skyscape (w/ James Turrell) San Francisco, CA Auerbach Glasow French (1999-2001) Tampa Museum Tampa, FL Designer Tacoma Art Museum: New Haub Galleries (w/ OKA) Seattle, WA Bill & Melinda Gates Visitor Center (w/ OKA) Seattle, WA Arup (2001-2013) Practice Leader Center For Innovation at MOHAI (w/ OKA) Seattle, WA Space Shuttle Endeavor Los Angeles, CA Niteo (2013-present) Managing Partner healthcare San Francisco General Hospital San Francisco, CA Kaiser San Diego Hospital San Diego, CA education BS Architectural Engineering corporate Disney Grand Central Campus Glendale, CA University of Colorado, Boulder Pixar Animation Studios Emeryville, CA Google - East Charleston Lot Mountain View, CA affiliations Genentech Office Building, Hilltop A South San Francisco, CA IALD Professional Member Samsung HQ San Jose, CA HNI-Gunlocke Corporate HQ (TI) Muscatine, IA LEED AP Note: due to Client requested confidentiality I am not able to disclose all past and lectures present corporate project work Instructor at UC Berkeley bridges Instructor at PG&E Energy Center Robert I. Schroder Bridge Pleasant Hill, CA Coronado Bridge Competition Finalist San Diego, CA Architecture in the City (Fall 2012) Transbay Cable Stayed Bridge San Francisco, CA Academy of Art College (Fall 2013) Gerald Desmond Bridge Long Beach, CA education Stanford Graduate School of Business Palo Alto, CA
*Awarded IES Award of Excellence
* projects by Jason Edling or Key Anderson prior to forming Niteo Scope Scope Assumptions The following assumptions were made in providing this proposal: • Niteo will provide lighting for front of house areas only. • Elevation and plan layouts will be furnished to Niteo in any exported CAD format, and will be returned to the Architect as AutoCAD 2015 (or pdf markups) for inclusion into their documents. • This base fee is for the specification of all interior luminaires and luminaires affixed to the architecture. • Lighting locations will be shown on architectural RCPs only and managed by BCJ. Niteo will provide a continued advisory role to complete RCP construction documents together with BCJ. Lighting product cutsheets ("Lighting Manual") will remain managed by Niteo throughout the project. • Lighting control design and engineering to be by Electrical Engineer • Niteo will attend coordination meetings on an as-needed basis (in lieu of weekly) at a time suitable to overlap with relevant disciplines. Project Schedule The scope here-in provides for both new construction and renovation work as outlined in the RFP. The duration of the phases are as follows:
Master Plan Review/Programming 2 months (2/20/15 - 4/16/15) Conceptual Design 2.5 months (3/17/15 - 6/1/15) Schematic Design 3 months (6/1/15 - 8/31/15) Design Development 3.5 months (8/17/15 - 12/3/15) Construction Documents 3 months (12/3/15 - 5/9/16) Construction completes 3/8/18
Upon completion of each phase of design we would request confirmation that the work has been approved as the basis of all further project development. Items that have not been approved should be noted so that they may be addressed in following phases of design. We require frozen background drawings two weeks in advance of delivering Schematic Design, Design Development or Construction Documentation milestones.
Hourly Rates
Requested additional services not included in this scope will be billed at an hourly rate of $150/hour for Niteo’s Partners, $110/hour for Designers and $50 for Clerical.
Master Plan Review /Programming (2 months)
The scope of services for Master Plan Review /Programming includes: • Attend (1) kick-off meeting with the Architect and Atherton's representatives which lighting is on the agenda. • Lighting documents are not developed this phase, however Niteo will act as an advisor in improving the overall integrated design's holistic performance, aesthetics and energy efficiency. • With hand sketches, Niteo will propose project-wide ideas, as well as recognize neighborhood and environmental needs with respect to lighting. Conceptual Design (2.5 months)
The scope of services for Conceptual Design includes: • Lighting documents are not developed this phase, however Niteo will attend lighting design charettes at BCJ to identify feasible concept integration opportunities throughout the project. • Concept sketches and imagery to demonstrate the intent and lighting integration ideas. Schematic Design (3 months)
The scope of services for Schematic Design includes: • Ongoing meetings with the Architect to continue gaining acceptance for lighting concepts and their integration into the project for the entire project. • Sketches and imagery to demonstrate the intent and lighting integration ideas. • Hand sketches and markups of BCJ's typical RCP layouts demonstrating intention of fixture locations and fixture types. • Provide presentation support by issuing lighting slides for one (1) presentation by BCJ to the project stakeholders to garner support for the lighting strategies and to validate that the approach accommodates the requirements of the Owner. Design Development (3.5 months)
The scope of services for Design Development includes: • Incorporation of comments during the presentation delivered in Schematic Design. • Lighting manual denoting fixture type and source selections (at two milestones). • Active reviews of BCJ's development of architectural RCP construction documents (at two milestones). • Meeting with engineer to agree to control intent (for the purpose of cost estimating and electrical engineering). • Advise on requirements for mock-ups and scale models for lighting studies for Construction Documentation (if required). • Provide presentation support by issuing lighting slides for one (1) presentation by BCJ to the project stakeholders to garner support for the lighting strategies and to validate that the approach accommodates the requirements of the Owner
Construction Documentation (3 months)
The scope of services for Construction Documentation includes: • Continued coordination of lighting equipment via engagement in design meetings at BCJ. • Active reviews of BCJ's development of architectural RCP construction documents (at two milestones). • Final issues of lighting manual (fully annotated fixture schedule with equipment data sheets) for inclusion into the Division 26 written specifications (at two milestones). Construction Administration
The scope for Construction Administration is as follows: • Review up to two (2) lighting submittals and one re-submittal provided by the Contractor for those fixtures specified as part of this scope of work. • Assistance to the architect with RFI responses when clarification of the design intent (documented in Construction Documents) is required. • Two (2) site visits during electrical rough-in to review the installation and to provide a punch list for lighting related items specified under this scope. Construction Administration, Focusing
The scope for Focusing is as follows: • One site visit (for 2 individuals) to focus the lighting after the lighting installation is complete with furniture, FFE and landscape works complete and installed.
Charles M. Salter Associates | Acoustics + Audio/Visual FIRM BIO
FIRM PROFILE
Charles M. Salter Associates, Inc. was founded in 1975. We consult in acoustics and design audiovisual, telecommunications, and security systems for buildings. With offices in San Francisco and San Jose, we are involved in over 900 projects per year worldwide. Our team of more than 50 comprises Professional Engineers, LEED Accredited Professionals, Certified Technology Specialists, Registered Communications Distribution Designers, Fellows of the Audio Engineering Society, Fellows of the Acoustical Society of America, and a PhD, as well as individuals with interdisciplinary and advanced degrees in architecture, music, linguistics, business, and forensics. We draw from this diverse expertise to develop solutions uniquely tailored to each project.
Providing high quality acoustical, audiovisual, telecommunications, and security design in civic centers, court rooms, libraries, community centers, and museums is critical to achieve speech intelligibility in these noise sensitive-environments. The integration of design-appropriate acoustical treatments is important to the overall function and aesthetics of the space. Having consulted on thousands of civic projects, we rely on this experience to collaborate with the design team and develop solutions to meet the unique goals and requirements of each project. RESUMES
RESUME
Cristina L. Miyar Vice President
Ms. Miyar has been an acoustical consultant with Charles M. Salter Associates, Inc. since 1995. She specializes in architectural acoustics, MEP system noise and vibration control, and environmental noise mitigation. Her typical projects include acoustical design for civic spaces, office buildings, multi-purpose auditoria, film and broadcast studios, and multi-family housing.
project experience - Newport Beach Civic Center and Park, Newport Beach, CA
education - 50 United Nations Plaza Federal Building, San Francisco, CA University of California at Berkeley, - Novato City Administration Building, Novato, CA M.Arch, 1995 Salt Lake City International Airport Terminal Redevelopment, Wesleyan University, BA Music, - concentration in experimental Salt Lake City, UT acoustics, 1990 - Pier 27 Cruise Terminal, San Francisco, CA Institut für Leichte Flächen- - Mayfair Community Center, San Jose, CA Tragwerke, Universität Stuttgart, Summer 1989 - Mississippi River Discovery Center, Dubuque, ID - Doerr-Hosier Center, Aspen, CO professional affiliations - San Francisco Museum of Modern Art Remodel, San Francisco, CA Allied Member of AIA San Francisco - DeYoung Museum, San Francisco, CA Institute of Noise Control Engineering - Crocker Museum Addition, Sacramento, CA - Stanford Art Museum, Palo Alto, CA
publications - Sharith Israel Community Center, San Francisco, CA Contributing editor, ACOUSTICS: - San Ramon Valley Center, San Ramon, CA Architecture, Engineering, the Environment (1998 William Stout - Dougherty Valley Village Center, San Ramon, CA Publisher) - Armand Hammer Museum Theater, Los Angeles, CA Undergraduate honors thesis, Sonic Architecture, on the integration of - Newseum, Washington, DC sound and space design - The J. David Gladstone Institutes Mission Bay, San Francisco, CA - Stanford University James H. Clark Center, Stanford, CA - Tustin Library, Tustin, CA - Walt Disney Concert Hall, Los Angeles, CA - Norton Simon Museum Theater, Pasadena, CA - Pixar Animation Studios, Emeryville, CA RESUME
Lloyd B. Ranola Principal Consultant
Mr. Ranola has worked in audiovisual and broadcast system design since 1995. He worked with large integration firms for 15 years prior to joining Charles M. Salter Associates, Inc. Some of his specialties include conference room and auditorium technology, audio and video conferencing, unified communications infrastructure, digital signage, and broadcast production facility design. Mr. Ranola has managed large multi-disciplinary projects consisting of audiovisual, telecommunications, and security for large public and commercial spaces. education San Francisco State University, BA Broadcasting and Electronic project experience Communication Arts (BECA) - Autodesk Gallery at One Market, San Francisco, CA - Maddie’s Center, Pleasanton, CA training & certification - San Lorenzo Valley Performing Arts Center, Felton, CA Shoretel Advanced Sales Certification - Umpqua Bank Flagship Store, San Francisco, CA Polycom Infrastructure Sales - 470 Spear Street, San Francisco, CA Training - Letterman Digital Arts Center Conference Room, San Francisco, CA Cisco Telepresence Video Sales Specialist - PG&E Bay Metro Distribution Control Center, Concord, CA
Lutron Commercial Audiovisual - Wilmer Hale, Palo Alto, CA* Lighting - Rosetta/LEVEL Studios, San Luis Obispo, CA NSCA Project Management Training - Nixon Peabody, San Francisco, CA* IBEW Fundamentals of Contracting - Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, San Francisco, CA* Law
Crestron DMC-D - Novartis, Emeryville, CA* - Actelion Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA*
professional affiliations - CBS Interactive, San Francisco, CA* Infocomm - Stanford University David Rumsey Map Center, Stanford, CA Allied Member of AIA San Francisco - Salt Lake City Community College Center for New Media, Salt Lake City, UT - UC San Diego Torrey Pines Center Studio, San Diego, CA - UC San Francisco Parnassus Millberry Union, San Francisco, CA - Wharton School of Business, San Francisco, CA* *Prior to joining Charles M. Salter Associates, Inc. SCOPE OF WORK
9 December2014
Colleen Salveson Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 49 Geary Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94108 Email: [email protected]
Subject: Town of Atherton Civic Center – Revised Proposal for Acoustical and Audiovisual Consulting Services
Dear Colleen:
We have revised the scope of services for this project in order to meet the reduced base fee of $27,000 for acoustics and audiovisual design services. We understand that this project consists of administration, library, and police facilities. The site is bounded by residences on three sides and Caltrain tracks to the north (about 150 feet away).
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
The buildings will total approximately 50,000 gross square feet The administration building will include the council chambers The library will have a multi-purpose room The MEP systems will be designed on a traditional design-bid-build basis The rail tracks are not expected to be a significant source of ground-borne vibration Meetings will be in San Francisco or Atherton The project budget is about $32 million The project goal is LEED Platinum
ACOUSTICS SCOPE OF SERVICES
We foresee the following acoustical issues as being pertinent to the project:
Environmental noise intrusion from surrounding roadways and the rail line Base-building MEP system HVAC noise and vibration isolation Room acoustics in the council chambers and multi-purpose room
Environmental Noise Study
1. Visit the project site and short-term noise measurements during peak hours 2. Based on collected data, provide exterior window and wall recommendations 3. Summarize our analysis and results in a written report
Schematic Design
1. Attend a design kick-off meeting in San Francisco Town of Atherton Civic Center – Acoustics and Audiovisual Revised 9 December 2014 Page 2
2. Develop criteria for architectural airborne and impact sound isolation, room acoustics, and HVAC system noise 3. Recommend changes to the plan configuration that could reduce the mitigation needed 4. Provide MEP system noise reduction guidelines that could be incorporated into the specifications 5. Prepare a narrative report summarizing the project acoustical criteria and preliminary recommendations
Design Development
1. Review the 100% schematic design drawings and provide comments using based on our Schematic Design Narrative 2. If Town Hall renovation add alternate is selected, evaluate existing exterior assemblies and provide recommendations for improving the sound insulation of these in order to reduce rail noise 3. Provide input related to room finishes for meeting the room acoustics criteria 4. Provide input regarding possible green acoustical designs as part of the LEED process 5. Review 50% design development drawings
Construction Documents
1. Review 100% design development drawings and specifications and identify outstanding recommendations 2. Provide acoustical input to the architectural specifications 3. If Town Hall renovation add-alternate is selected, finalize changes to exterior envelope and provide product information and details as required. 4. Using provided manufacturer sound data, complete mechanical noise calculations, including ductborne, duct breakout, flow noise, radiated noise, and expected noise intrusion into the occupied spaces from rooftop mechanical equipment 5. Review 75% construction documents drawings and specifications and provide a punch list of outstanding recommendations 6. Attend one coordination meeting in San Francisco
Construction Administration
1. Respond to submittals and RFIs 2. Visit the site once to observe items of acoustical interest – such as framing installation, plumbing isolation, and mechanical equipment isolation – and provide a written report
AUDIOVISUAL SCOPE OF SERVICES
Conceptual Design
1. Assist with initial space planning for audiovisual equipment 2. Assist with assessment if audiovisual/broadcast needs 3. Assist with the development of the preliminary cost estimate 4. Issue a preliminary system description in writing to establish an agreed-upon design path 5. Attend up to one meeting Town of Atherton Civic Center – Acoustics and Audiovisual Revised 9 December 2014 Page 3
Schematic Design
1. Attend a kick-off meeting with you and your project team to review the current design and determine the required audiovisual system functions and operational characteristics 2. Verify the expected level of audiovisual quality and the proposed installation budget 3. Issue a preliminary system description in writing to establish an agreed-upon design path 4. Provide aid in architectural integration tasks 5. Visit the site once to observe the existing audiovisual operations 6. Issue a design criteria memo for use by design team members, which would include the following issues: - Equipment power and lighting - HVAC and environmental control for technology rooms - Connectivity to support network based building systems - Seismic backing and support 7. Prepare the design development drawings and submit one deliverable 8. Attend up to one meeting
Design Development
1. Design an electrical infrastructure around the agreed-upon programmatic design path 2. Specify conduit, backboxes, floorboxes, backing for displays, and terminal cabinets 3. Continue to provide architectural integration details and information 4. Begin to develop audiovisual functional diagrams 5. Further develop equipment lists and cost estimates 6. Continue to assist with integration of audiovisual elements into the architecture and millwork by providing additional conceptual sketches and equipment literature 7. Prepare the design development drawings and submit one deliverable 8. Attend up to two meetings
Construction Documents
1. We will deliver a three-part Construction Specification Institute formatted audiovisual system specification and provide the following full-size drawings for inclusion into the project at two deliverable milestones - Audiovisual floor plan - Audiovisual details, equipment rack, and other elevations - Receptacle plate details - Single-line audio/video/control functional diagrams - Remote control touch-panel flowcharts - Conduit riser diagrams - Architectural coordination detail sheets 2. Attend up to two coordination meetings Town of Atherton Civic Center – Acoustics and Audiovisual Revised 9 December 2014 Page 4
Bidding
1. Review proposed value engineering suggestions 3. Provide a list of qualified audiovisual contractors 4. Respond to contractor RFIs 5. Review submitted bids to help verify that the contract documents have been correctly interpreted 6. Issue written memoranda documenting all reviews and RFIs 7. Attend pre-bid meeting at S480 to walk through the scope and to help clarify and answer contractor questions 8. Respond to requests for clarification submitted during the bidding period and issue addenda through the architect as necessary
Construction Administration
For the construction administration phase, since the level of effort needed for RFI and submittal review is unknown, we would consult on an hourly to a maximum basis. To provide a fee estimate, we have included one full day (eight hours) of RFI and submittal review, a one-day pre-construction meeting at the site, and one punchlist walk-through.
This level-of-effort assumes that the subcontractors properly implement modifications noted during our visits. If not, then there might need to be more site visits than expected for specific issues. We would perform the following tasks:
1. Review contractor submittals 2. Evaluate proposed substitutions 3. Continue to respond to contractor requests for clarification 4. Conduct a field observation to observe that system installation is proceeding according to plan and schedule 5. Participate in construction coordination meetings (during site visits) following key milestones to help resolve issues related to the equipment installation 6. Upon receipt of the specified audiovisual contractor’s preliminary testing and adjustment report, visit the site with the audiovisual contractor and perform acceptance testing and adjustment as we find appropriate 7. Issue a memorandum report indicating the system status 8. Perform a punchlist walk-through after final completion by the audiovisual contractor
FEE ESTIMATE
Based on our experience with projects of this type and the attached Terms and Conditions sheet, our fee estimate is outlined in the attached fee spreadsheet.
Expenses
Expenses will be billed in addition, at cost (with no markup). We expect that our reimbursable expenses for the project – which would primarily include mileage, parking and printing costs – would not exceed $2,000. Town of Atherton Civic Center – Acoustics and Audiovisual Revised 9 December 2014 Page 5
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
The following tasks are not included in the above scope of services. If desired, we can prepare a separate proposal for these tasks:
Substantial redesign beyond our control due to extensive value engineering or owner-requested changes following the design development phase Additional meetings or site visits Telecommunications infrastructure, and security system design Sound-masking design Public hearings Construction noise analysis Rail vibration analysis Noise ordinance analysis Acoustical mock-up and prototype testing, including acoustical simulations Witnessing performance tests Construction phase acoustical testing
We look forward to working with you on this project. Please sign in the space provided below and return a copy to our office as our authorization to proceed. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give us a call.
Sincerely,
CHARLES M. SALTER ASSOCIATES, INC. AGREED AND ACCEPTED
Cristina L. Miyar By: ______Vice President Bohlin Cywinski Jackson
Lloyd B. Ranola Date: ______Principal Consultant
Enclosure k/eg09dec2014clm01 The Fire Consultants | Fire Protection + Building Code FIRM BIO
The Fire Consultants, Inc. is a consulting engineering firm focused on fire protection and building code compliance issues. Our professional staff includes registered Fire Protection and Mechanical Engineers with experience in all aspects of fire protection engineering. Our current engineering staff has an average of 15 years of experience in fire protection engineering.
The Fire Consultants, Inc. has experience designing fire alarm, sprinkler and special suppression systems and reviewing those designs by others, as well as developing and reviewing fire protection reports and code compliance assessments. We have extensive experience developing conceptual designs for smoke control in high-rise buildings and atriums, and in testing these systems. We have experience conducting Statement of Condition Assessments, fire safety evaluation systems assessments and witnessing system commissioning and confidence testing as well as developing witnessing and reviewing fire rated assembly tests.
The Fire Consultants, Inc. has conducted and evaluated computer system models for fire spread, smoke spread and water distribution. We have experience dealing with federal and military codes and standards as well as the codes and standards of various cities and states. We have experience directly addressing these types of projects and bringing them to a successful conclusion. This direct experience will allow us to efficiently and effectively address these projects as they arise in the future. Our professional staff has also served on multiple code development committees. We have been involved with a wide variety and number of project delivery methods including Fixed Price Construction projects and Design-Build and Design-Assist projects. The Fire Consultants, Inc strives to provide cost effective design approaches to all clients. This broad range and depth of experience will be invaluable to the end Client.
The Fire Consultants, Inc. is located in the San Francisco Bay Area, but participates in projects anywhere. We have experience in many metropolitan areas throughout the western United States including San Francisco, San Jose, Sacramento, Los Angeles, San Diego, Portland, Seattle, Salt Lake City, Las Vegas, Anchorage, Honolulu and surrounding areas. Our engineers have professional engineering registration, as either fire protection engineers or mechanical engineers, in California, Colorado, Oregon, Washington, Utah and Hawaii.
RESUMES
JEFFREY A. MADDOX, P. E.
Jeffrey A. Maddox is a Principal of The Fire Consultants Inc. and is a registered fire protection engineer with over 25 years of experience in fire protection, building code consulting and system design. He is registered as a Fire Protection Engineer in California and as a Professional Engineer in Oregon and Colorado. Mr. Maddox holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Fire Protection Engineering from the University of Maryland, College Park, 1986.
Mr. Maddox has worked with architects, developers, owners and authorities having jurisdiction to determine fire protection code compliance. He has been involved with the review of architectural projects through the design phase and during construction. He has prepared due diligence and fire protection evaluation reports and is familiar with state, local and federal accessibility requirements. He has extensive experience with smoke control in high rise buildings. He also has experience with hotels, atria, educational, renovated, and mixed-use facilities in the U.S. and abroad. He has extensive experience with buildings utilizing operable windows and underfloor supply.
Mr. Maddox has used time exiting, fire resistance heat transfer principles, smoke development, and fire growth models as part of the justification for approval of modifications to fire protection requirements. He has been involved with projects utilizing base isolation systems and has developed fire protection concepts for these systems. He has developed operational and testing criteria for smoke control systems in high rise buildings, malls, atriums, and large industrial facilities.
Mr. Maddox has current or previous professional affiliations with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE), International Code Council, Salamander Honorary Fire Protection Engineering Society, ASHRAE Technical Committee 5.6, Smoke Management and NFPA Safety to Life Project Assembly, Fire Protection Features Committees.
The following are Technical Papers, Publications, and Speeches that Mr. Maddox has contributed:
§. “Fire Protection for Asymmetric Atria,” two case studies, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Rocky Mountain Chapter, 1991.
§. “Smoke Control System Design for Atria,” National Fire Protection Association Annual Meeting, 1994.
§. “Smoke Control and High Rise Office buildings with Operable Windows: Two Case Studies,” ASHRAE Winter Meeting 2004.
§. “Computer Modeling and Fire Tests Used to Verify Fire Resistance of Various Wall Assemblies,” Interfam 2004, Edinburgh, Scotland.
§. “Smoke Control in Buildings with Operable Windows,” Pacific Energy Center Seminar, 2005.
§. “An FDS Analysis of Sprinkler and Draft Stops at Floor Openings,” International Conference on Performance-Based Codes and Fire Safety Design Methods, Tokyo, Japan, 2006.
§. SFPE Guide for Fire Safety in Very Tall Buildings. Mr. Maddox is the coordinating chairman on the smoke control and fire resistance chapters.
Mr. Maddox has been the primary Fire Protection Engineer on the following recent Office and large building projects:
Foundry Square Office Development (4 buildings), San Francisco. These buildings include a double skin curtain wall and raised floor supply air.
San Francisco Federal Office Building. This building relies on operable windows and a double skin curtain wall for ventilation.
CalSTRS Headquarters, West Sacramento, CA. This building includes a raised floor supply plenum.
Pixar Headquarters Phase 1 and 2, Emeryville, CA.
500 Capital Mall, Sacramento, CA. This building includes a raised floor supply plenum.
Numerous Apple retail stores. These buildings utilize structural glass.
Juniper Networks, Sunnyvale, CA. A campus with numerous high rise office towers.
GAP World Headquarters, San Francisco. This building utilizes operable windows to supplement HVAC.
Stadiums including Pac Bell Ballpark, SF, California Memorial Stadium Berkeley, Stanford Stadium, Palo Alto.
Page 2 SCOPE OF WORK
November 24, 2014
Mr. Steve Chaitow Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 49 Geary Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94108
ATHERTON CIVIC CENTER FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY CONSULTING SERVICES
Dear Steve:
This letter serves as our revised proposal to provide fire and life safety consulting services for the Atherton Civic Center project. The goal of our services will be to assist you in developing a code complying fire protection approach. You have asked that we break our scope between the City Hall, Town Hall remodel, and Garage portions of the project, with the latter two scopes considered add alternates. This is difficult to do as much of our time is spent in meetings and correspondence which has the same fee whether we are discussing 1 building or 3. We have tried to give an indication of how much of our time is allotted between the 3 different buildings, where appropriate. We have proposed no scope or fee in the Programing, Bidding, or Construction phases, or for the other add alternates. We anticipate the following scope:
SCOPE OF SERVICES
CONCEPT PHASE
1. Provide 8 hours of general consulting to complete reviews of the concept designs and provide verbal or e-mail feedback related to life safety code compliance.
SCHEMATIC PHASE
1. Review one set of the Schematic phase drawings to develop a list of fire and life safety issues and a fire protection approach.
2. Prepare e-mails and/ or marked-up drawings identifying fire protection related issues and the location of rated walls and other separations once during the schematic phase.
MR. STEVE CHAITOW 14-1820 – Page 2 ATHERTON CIVIC CENTER November 24, 2014 FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY CONSULTING SERVICES
3. Participate in up to two conference calls or meetings with the design team in San Francisco to discuss fire and life safety related issues.
4. Prepare a fire protection code summary describing the fire protection approach.
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT (DD) PHASE
1. Review one set of the DD phase drawings to develop a list of fire and life safety issues and a fire protection approach.
2. Visit the existing Town Hall to investigate fire protection related conditions, in order to understand the impact of the addition.
3. Update the fire protection code summary describing the fire protection approach with the 100 % submittal.
4. Participate in one meeting with the City of Atherton Building Officials to discuss fire and life safety related issues.
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS (CD) PHASE
1. Review one set of the CD phase drawings to develop a list of fire and life safety suggested changes.
2. Update the fire protection code summary describing the fire protection approach with the 100 % submittal.
3. Participate in one meeting with the City of Atherton Building Officials to discuss fire and life safety related issues.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
We will perform these services on a fixed fee of $20,475 plus $350 expense basis as described below.
Civic Center Town Hall Re- Garage Expenses Base use Concept $1,800 Schematics $4,500 Design Development $2,925 $2,250 $1,350 Construction $3,150 $2,250 $1,350 Documents Total $13,275 $4,500 $2,700 $350
Watry Design, Inc. | Parking Garage Design FIRM BIO
WATRY DESIGN, INC. is dedicated to making our clients look good. We take their problems and issues on as our own and team with them to find the best possible solution for their parking needs. with This client centered philosophy along an unmatched passion for parking try form Wa Design, Inc.’s guiding vision.
Using a unique process developed over the firm’s thirty eight year design legacy, our architects, structural engineers and planners are empowered to provide their professional expertise in every his aspect of the design. T gives our clients the collective knowledge and experience of our entire staff. This collaborative methodology enables us to provide utions our clients with well integrated sol for satisfied clients.
Incorporated in 2000, Watry Design, Inc. cessor is the suc organization of Watry Design Group which was founded in 1975. The new corporation was created when a group of long time employees purchased the net assets y of the original firm and most importantl retained all the staff. Led by a team of Principals, Watry Design has delivered over 700 parking projects on time and on budget throughout the Western United States.
We offer design services at ALL STAGES OF THE PARKING LIFECYCLE
Whether you need to assess your current parking conditions or evaluate the potential of one site or a whole campus, we offer services to meet your needs. Our team designs surface, structured, underground and mixed-‐use parking, as well as parking garage components of larger buildings and developments. From -‐ traditional Design Bid-‐Build to the Design-‐Build process, we deliver parking structures using the appropriate delivery method for your project.
Watry Design leverages the best innovation ogy and technol the industry has to offer. From integrating Photovoltaics to utilizing mechanical parking, our team develops highly efficient new, as well as replacement parking solutions.
Below is a partial list of our parking services. If you don’t see what you are looking for, please call us because if it is related to parking, we can help.
Parking Master Planning & Parking Site Planning Parking Facility Planning & Design Parking Supply & Demand Studies Photovoltaic & LEED Certification Analysis Shared Parking & Parking Phasing Analysis Mechanical/Automated Parking Solutions Parking Technology Assessments Specification & Parking Structure Opinions of Cost & Pro Forma Development Development Parking Facility Maintenance & ADA Upgrades Parking Structure Feasibility Studies Restoration & Seismic Upgrades Sustainable Parking Best Practices Parking Operations & Management Studies
WATRY DESIGN EXPERTISE
Relevant Projects Capitola Village Parking Study, CA In support of both -‐ short and long-‐term planning purposes, Watry Design, Inc. and Field Paoli conducted a Parking Feasibility Study for the City of Capitola. The goal of the study was to develop preliminary project s details for the first phase, which include a parking structure, a new City Hall & possible commercial development project. In addition to the creation of parking for 554 vehicles, the program had site constraints, sight line and pedestrian concerns, as well as budget parameters.
Sonoma County Government Center Parking Site Analysis Study, CA Watry Design, Inc. and conducted site a analysis for Sonoma County. The analysis included developing 4 structured parking options that would support plans to expand and update the government center.
County and City of Napa Joint Parking Feasibility Study, CA Watry Design, Inc. was hired to prepare a Feasibility Study for a parking structure to provide employee parking for the adjacent government complex, for the tenants and residents of the neighboring mixed-‐use development and for the general public visiting Napa's downtown district. In addition, the firm was hired to develop criteria documents for the resulting parking structure.
Temecula Civic Center Parking Structure, Temecula, CA The Historic Old Town District of Temecula needed more parking to serve the upcoming relocation of the City's Civic Center, as well as nearby retail. The City selected an existing vacant lot between Interstate 15 and the area's prominent Mercedes Street for a multilevel parking structure with office space. Watry Design, o Inc. was selected t meet the challenges of this project, which include meeting an aggressive schedule, developing a design in keeping with the Mission Revival ing architecture of the area and controll the design budget while not compromising the complexity and highly detailed design of the building overall.
San Mateo County Government Center Master Plan, Redwood City, CA The County needed to solve parking challenges as an integral part of their master plan. Watry Design conducted a study that included analyzing the parking supply and demand over time and locating the new parking structures on campus. The Watry Design team concluded that the new parking should be sited along the newly created pedestrian promenade that traverses the County’s campus. This placement created convenient connects to the various buildings the parking would serve.
San Mateo County Government Center Parking Structure, Redwood City, CA Following the completion of the master plan, Watry Design was hired to design 900 the structured parking to accommodate parking stalls.
Santa Clara County Civic Center Parking Structure, San Jose, CA The Watry team designed the parking for Santa Clara County’s courthouse and government center, which includes a pedestrian bridge that links the county buildings parking with the structure terminating at a stair and elevator tower. The structure is a revenue-‐ generating facility, which is operated by a parking company.
Additional Relevant Projects San Mateo Library Parking Structure, San Mateo, CA Walnut Creek Library ing Park Structure, Walnut Creek, CA Covina Downtown Parking Structure II Study, Covina, CA Covina Downtown Parking Structure, Covina, CA Covina Metrolink Parking Structure, CA RESUMES
WATRY DESIGN EXPERTISE
Jess McInerney, SE Drawing from over 19 years of experience in parking structure design, Jess ensures that Principal each project's structural solution effectively integrates with the parking layout and
architectural design. In addition, he continues to investigate innovative structural solutions to our client's problems; a vital role when considering the structural system usually accounts for 60 to 70% of the project construction cost.
Relevant Projects
Disney Creative Campus Expansion Parking Structure, Glendale, CA Baldwin Park Transit Center Parking Structure, CA City of San Rafael Parking Structure, CA City of Redlands Parking Structure, CA BART Millbrae Parking Structure, CA City of Livermore Valley Center Parking Structure, CA Education Granada Parking Garage & Office Building, Santa Barbara, CA Bachelor of Science in Architectural Brentwood Parking Structure Feasibility Study, CA Engineering, California Polytechnic State City of Hayward Parking Structure Study, CA University, Wailuku Municipal Parking Structure Study, Maui, HI San Luis Obispo, CA Los Gatos Parking Structure Feasibility Study, CA
Registrations City of Watsonville Parking Structure Feasibility Study, CA S. E. (#S4497), CA (2/8/01) City of Hercules Multimodal & Waterfront Parking Structure Study, CA S.E. (#43512), WA (4/19/07) Chess Hatch Parking Structures, Foster City, CA P. E. (#C56762), CA (2/7/97) Playa Vista Mixed-‐Use, Los Angeles, CA P. E. (#73314PE), OR (07/15/03) Emeryville Public Market Parking Structure, CA P.E. (#6807210-‐2202), UT (3/31/08) The River Oaks Parking Structures, Houston, TX NCEES (#19230), (10/24/00) Sunset Strip -‐ Mixed Use, Los Angeles, CA SECB (#2586) (7/1/08) Blossom Plaza China Town, Los Angeles, CA
Palladio at Broadstone Parking Structures, Folsom, CA Affiliations Structural Engineers Association The Historic Guasti District Parking Structures Ontario, CA International Council of Shopping Centers Santana Row Parking Master Plan Update & Parcel 3B, San Jose, CA International Parking Institute Platinum Triangle Parking Study, Anaheim, CA Design Build Institute of America Olympia Place Parking Structure, Walnut Creek, CA Structural Engineers Association Plaza Escuela Parking Structure, Walnut Creek, CA Talbots Retail & Parking Structure, Walnut Creek, CA Hillsdale Mall, San Mateo, CA
California Ctr. Corporate Center Parking Structure, Pleasanton, CA Riverside Drive Parking Structure, Sherman Oaks, CA Eccles Life Campus Parking Structure, South San Francisco, CA
BioMarin Parking Structure, Marin, CA Biomedical Campus Mixed Use Parking Structure (PBC), Phoenix, AZ Disney Grand Central GC Parking Structure, Glendale, CA
River Oaks District Parking Structure, Houston, TX Mission Bay Parcel 6, South San Francisco, CA San Rafael Corporate Center Lindaro Parking Structure, CA
VMware Campus Parking Structures 1, 2 & 3 Davies Symphony Hall Parking Structure, San Francisco, CA Circle Star Parking Structure, Redwood City, CA
Chabot Observatory Parking Structure, Oakland, CA
20+ WATRY DESIGN EXPERTISE
Michelle Wendler, AIA Michelle, a Principal with Watry Design, Inc., has worked extensively with parking Principal structure design, construction documents and construction administration since 1989.
“Our goal is to make our clients look good. We take our clients’ problems and issues as our own and we team with them to find the best possible solutions,” says Michelle. In addition, she tirelessly strives to ensure that the firm’s designs work within the context of their environment and are something that everyone can be proud of. Michelle has extensive experience working with municipalities to develop effective parking as evident from the relevant projects ow. bel Michelle serves on the Advisory Council for the International Parking Institute and is an active participant in industry associations, a powerful speaker and compelling advocate for parking.
Relevant Projects San Mateo County Government Center Master Plan, Redwood City, CA Education San Mateo County Government Center Parking Structure, Redwood City, CA Bachelor of Architecture Capitola Village Parking , Study CA California Polytechnic State University, Sonoma County Government Center Parking Site Analysis Study, CA San Luis Obispo, CA County and City of Napa Joint Parking Feasibility Study, CA Santa Clara County Civic Center Parking Structure, San Jose, CA Registrations Temecula Civic Center Parking Structure, Temecula, CA Architect (#25066), CA (5/24/94) San Mateo Library Parking Structure, San Mateo, CA Walnut Creek Library Parking Structure, Walnut Creek, CA Affiliations Covina Downtown Parking Structure II Study, Covina, CA American Institute of Architects Covina Downtown Parking Structure, Covina, CA International Parking Institute -‐ Member Covina Metrolink Parking Structure, CA of the Advisory Council & the SolTrans Vallejo Parking & Transit Hub, Vallejo, CA (Group 4 Team) Sustainability Committee Santa Cruz Metro Pacific Station Transit Center, Santa Cruz, CA (Group 4 Team) California Public Parking Association City of Santa Cruz Parking Structure Feasibility Study, CA Roseville Downtown Parking Structure Study, CA Town of Truckee Parking Study, CA
City of Menlo Park Parking Structure Feasibility Study, CA
City of San Jose San Jose Greyhound Feasibility Parking Structure Study, CA City of Chico Parking Structure Feasibility Study, CA City of San Mateo Parking Structure Feasibility Study, CA City of Brentwood Feasibility Study, CA
Wailuku Parking Structure Feasibility Study, Maui, HI
Town of Los Gatos Feasibility Study, CA Downtown Palo Alto Feasibility Study, CA City of Hayward Lot 2 Parking Structure Study, CA Palm Nipomo Parking Structure, San Luis Obispo, CA
City of Redlands Parking Structure, CA
Vallejo Station Parking Structure Ph A, CA City of Oceanside Transit Parking Structure, CA Palm and Morro Office & Parking Structure, San Luis Obispo, CA Napa 5th Street Parking Structure, Napa, CA
City of Palo Alto Lots R & S/L Parking Structures, CA City of Fresno Convention Center Parking Structure, CA City of Riverside Parking Structure #6, CA 20+ City of San Rafael Parking Structure, CA Years in Miller Ave. Parking Structure, South San Francisco, CA
parking design SCOPE OF WORK
Atherton Civic Center 11/21/14 WDI # 14097 Page 2 of 3
ASSU PT NS
• Watry will be functional parking designer. BCJ will be Architect of Chekene Record and Rutherford will be Engineer or Record.
XC US NS BAS C
• Preparation of final documents. Our work will be incorporated into BCJ documents.
C NSU TANTS
• Watry Design, Inc. shall hire the following consultants to prepare work for the project based on their expertise: o one.
SC P S C S
1.1 aster Plan e iew Phase – 2 months 1.1.1 Watry Design, Inc. shall attend kickoff meeting, site tour, coordination and meetings (assume 2) 1.1.2 Watry will assist with preliminary budget and schedule review 1.1.3 Watry will assist team with parking related site analysis issues. Watry prepared drawings are not included in this scope. 1.1.4 Watry will assist team with budget, schedule and program as they relate to parking
1.2 Conceptual Design Phase – months 1.2.1 Watry Design, Inc. shall attend coordination meetings (assume 3) 1.2.2 Watry will assist team with site development as it relates to parking 1.2.3 Watry will review and assist with six conceptual design alternatives and their pros and cons as they relate to parking. Watry prepared drawings are not included in this scope. 1.2.4 Watry will review final concept plan for parking issues. 1.2.5 Watry will assist with response to technical reviews from town, planning, building, fire, police, utilities and the Civic Center Advisory Committee. 1.2.6 Watry will review preliminary cost estimate.
1. Schematic Design – months
1.3.1 Watry Design, Inc. shall attend coordination meetings (assume 3) 1.3.2 Watry will assist team with parking related cost, schedule, code review and parking program. 1.3.3 Watry will review and comment on 60 chematic Documents. 1.3.4 Watry will assist with response to technical reviews.
1. Design De elopment Phase – months Base Pro ect 1.4.1 Watry Design, Inc. shall attend coordination meetings (assume 2) 1.4.2 Watry shall review and comment on Design Development Documents
Add Alternate – Underground Garage 1.4.3 Watry will assist BCJ with design of: • Entries/Exits • Parking stalls and drive aisles • Ramping
San Jose, CA • Austin, TX • Newport Beach, CA watrydesign.com Atherton Civic Center 11/21/14 WDI # 14097 Page 3 of 3
• Drainage • Accessible parking and paths • Openness • Vehicular and pedestrian circulation 1.4.4 Watry Design, Inc. shall prepare, for incorporation into BCJ documents: Parking Level Plan with ramping and drainage 1.4.5 Watry will assist with updating cost estimate
1.5 Construction Documents Phase – 5 months 1.5.1 Watry Design, Inc. shall attend coordination meetings (assume 2) 1.5.2 Watry shall review and comment on Design Development Documents
Add Alternate – Underground Garage 1.5.3 Watry will assist BCJ with design of: • Entries/Exits • Parking stalls and drive aisles • Ramping • Drainage • Accessible parking and paths • Openness • Vehicular and pedestrian circulation 1.5.4 Watry will review and comment on Construction Documents 1.5.5 Watry will assist with updating cost estimate
1.6 Permitting Phase – 8 months 1.6.1 Watry Design, Inc. shall assist in responding to Plan Check comments.
1.7 Bidding – 2 months 1.7.1. Watry Design, Inc. shall assist in reviewing construction bids for the project.
1.8 Construction Administration Phase – 18 months 1.8.1. Watry will assist the team with parking related questions during construction.
San Jose, CA • Austin, TX • Newport Beach, CA watrydesign.com Simpson Gumpertz & Heger | Waterproofing FIRM BIO
SIMPSON GUMPERTZ & HEGER
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger (SGH) is a national engineering firm that designs, investigates, and rehabilitates structures and building enclosures. Our award-winning work encompasses building, nuclear, transportation, water/wastewater, and science/defense projects throughout the United States and in more than thirty other countries.
Clients choose to work with us because
• We collaborate with clients and project team members. • We engage our extensive expertise. • We focus on delivering successful results. • We respond to project challenges.
Our goals are simple: earn the lasting trust of our clients, gain the respect of our most capable peers, and further the standards of practice in all areas of our profession.
CAPABILITIES
SGH services are supported by technical capabilities, including:
• Building Envelope Engineering • Engineering for Extreme Environments • Structural Engineering • Preservation Technology • Engineering Mechanics • Materials Science and Engineering • Building Science • Field and Laboratory Testing • Construction Engineering
PEOPLE
Our team members include engineers, architects, scientists, and many other technical professionals. Our staff members are led by principals and project managers who average twenty years of employment with SGH. These leaders provide quality of service and team continuity to support our long-term client relationships.
FACTS AND FIGURES
• Recipient of over 400 awards and recognitions in the past ten years More than 475 employees in six offices: Boston, Chicago, New York, San Francisco, Southern California, and Washington, DC • Member of the Global Design Alliance
www.sgh.com RESUMES
Kenneth A. Klein, P.E. Senior Principal 415-343-3023 [email protected]
Ken leads the West Coast Building Technology division, and is experienced in the design and investigation of waterproofing of commercial, institutional, and residential buildings. His work addresses issues related to the integrity of curtain walls, roofs, plaza deck, and below-grade systems on a wide-range of structures from residential and high-rise building to buildings of historic significance. Ken has consulted with architects, contractors, and building owners to analyze and repair water intrusion problems and construction defects. Well known in the industry, he has frequently presented to groups of attorneys, contractors, architects, and other design professional regarding building- envelope design and remediation.
Experience Registrations Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc., San Francisco, CA, from 1985 to present. Civil Engineer California Waterproofing Design Nevada Hayward City Hall, Hayward, CA. (Roofing and waterproofing consultation.) Washington Emery Station Office Park, Emeryville, CA. (Roofing and below-grade waterproofing consultation.) Professional Engineer Doe/Moffitt Addition, University of California, Berkeley, CA. (Plaza deck, roofing, and Idaho below-grade waterproofing.) Oregon Texas Mission Place, MBN1 Developments, San Francisco, CA. (Roofing and waterproofing consultation.) Other Santana Row, San Jose, CA. (Roofing and waterproofing consultation.) National Council of Examiners for 333 First Street Condominiums, San Francisco, CA. (Roofing and waterproofing Engineering and Surveying (NCEES) consultation.) Record, #39148 Letterman Digital Arts, Presidio, San Francisco, CA. (Roofing and waterproofing consultation.) Education California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA. (Waterproofing design of green University of California, Berkeley, CA roof and below-grade waterproofing.) B.S. in Civil Engineering, 1983 Monterey Bay Aquarium, Monterey, CA. (Plaza deck, roofing, and below-grade
waterproofing.) Professional Activities Construction Specifications Institute: Terminal 2, San Francisco Airport, San Francisco, CA. (Roofing and waterproofing Member. consultation.) American Society of Civil Engineers: Moscone Center Expansion Phase III, San Francisco, CA. (Roofing and Member. waterproofing consultation.) Roof Consultants Institute: Member. Mission Bay Building 24, UCSF, San Francisco, CA. (Roofing and waterproofing Sealant, Waterproofing, and Restoration consultation.) Institute: Member. Sowwah Square Hotel, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. (Roofing and
waterproofing consultation.)
275 Sacramento Street, San Francisco, CA. (Roofing and below-grade waterproofing consultation.) Kaiser Sunset, Los Angeles, CA. (Roofing and waterproofing consultation.) SF Blu Condominiums, 631 Folsom, San Francisco, CA. (Roofing and waterproofing consultation.) The Millennium, 301 Mission, San Francisco, CA. (Roofing and waterproofing consultation.) 10th and Market Condominiums, San Francisco, CA (Roofing and waterproofing consultation.) Apple 2 – Campus, Cupertino, CA. (Roofing and waterproofing consultation.)
Matthew S. Worster, P.E. Senior Project Manager – Building Technology 415-343-3053 [email protected]
Matt Worster has more than fourteen years of experience in investigation, design, and construction contract administration of building-envelope components on both historic and contemporary structures. His projects have included below-grade waterproofing and traditional and modern roofing and wall claddings. He holds an advanced degree specializing in structural materials. Mr. Worster is experienced in presenting his work to both technical and nontechnical audiences.
Experience Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc. (SGH), San Francisco, CA, from 2003 to present. Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc. (SGH), Boston, MA, Staff I from 1998 to 2001.
Registrations Design and Construction Administration Civil Engineer UCSF – Mission Bay Campus, San Francisco, CA. (Mechanical duct below-grade California waterproofing.) Vermont UCSF – Mission Bay Campus, San Francisco, CA (Reestablishment of flooring Professional Engineer protection under slab-on–grade.) Alabama Denver Art Museum, Hamilton Building, Denver, CO. (Roofing and cladding repairs.) Colorado Oregon State Library and Courts Building, Sacramento, CA. (Terra-cotta repairs and roofing replacement.) Other 22 Fourth Street, San Francisco, CA (Plaza and fenestration leakage.) National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES) Sterling Memorial Library, Yale University, New Haven, CT. (Restoration of modern Record gothic library complex, architectural buttress reconstruction, concealed-masonry flashings, and slate and built-up roofing.) Education Christian Science Publishing House, First Church of Christ, Scientist, Boston, MA. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (PVC roofing, limestone cleaning and repairs, bronze window reglazing, metal B.S. in Civil Engineering, Cum Laude, cladding, and flashing.) 1998 Guidant Corporation, Santa Clara, CA. (EIFS repair and roofing replacement.) University of California - Berkeley, Berkeley, CA Village at Centennial Square, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA. M.S. in Structural Engineering, Mechanics, (Building envelope.) and Materials, 2002 Investigation and Evaluation Professional Activities State Library and Courts Building, Sacramento, CA. (Historic facade, terra-cotta, ASTM International, Technical Contact for wood, and bronze windows investigation and evaluation.) ASTM E1105. Solano County Hall of Law and Justice, Fairfield, CA. (Roofing and concrete repairs investigation and evaluation.)
Dormitory at Private High School, Pebble Beach, CA (Wall and roof leakage and flooring failure investigation.) Bank and Office Building, Palo Alto, CA (Cladding failure investigation.) 22 Fourth Street, San Francisco, CA (Plaza and fenestration leakage.) Denver Art Museum, Hamilton Building, Denver, CO. (Roofing and cladding investigation.) The Shangri-La, Doris Duke Estate, Honolulu, HI. (Roofing and plaster investigation and evaluation.) Highland Corporate Center, San Diego, CA. (Wall and window leakage, adhered- brick veneer investigation and evaluation.) Sterling Memorial Library, Yale University, New Haven, CT. (Roofing and granite/limestone masonry, water infiltration through masonry investigation and
SCOPE OF WORK
3 December 2014
Mr. Gregory Mottola Bohlin Cywinski Jackson 49 Geary Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94108
Re: Building Enclosure Consulting Services, Civic Center Design, Atherton, CA
Dear Mr. Mottola:
We shall be pleased to provide building enclosure consulting services at the above-named project.
We understand that Bohlin Cywinski Jackson (BCJ) will be the Architect-of-Record, and Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc. (SGH) will provide design consultation services. Design consultation will include recommending building enclosure materials and providing redline comments and sketches on specifications and document set. As the Architect-of-Record, BCJ may or may not incorporate our recommendations. BCJ will prepare all preliminary and final construction drawings and specifications.
1. SCOPE OF WORK
We have provided a scope of work and a budget fee based on our current understanding of your requirements based on the Town of Atherton request for proposal and on 6 February 2014 Conceptual Project Cost Plan, prepared by Marcene Taylor Inc.
We will assist BCJ in the design of the following specific areas of the building enclosure:
Foundation waterproofing and vapor retarding.
Cladding and water resistive barriers.
Fenestration and flashing.
Roofing.
We understand the following scopes of work:
1.1 Base Project
The Base Project will include a new two-story police and city administration building and a one- story library. The Cost Plan describes the cladding for both buildings as cement plaster with stone cladding over exterior sheathing and steel studs. The library also includes metal panels. The windows are “high performance insulated glazing with aluminum frames.” Roofing is rigid insulation with “high performance roofing.” Skylights are listed as an allowance for both buildings.
Mr. Gregory Mottola - 2 - 3 December 2014
Design Documents Phase
We will provide the following services for the Design Development phase:
Attend one kickoff meeting at BCJ offices in San Francisco.
Review the design concept and provide a letter summarizing design criteria and recommending building enclosure systems such cladding, water resistive barriers, continuous insulation if required, fenestration ratings, and roofing. We have budgeted 20 hrs for this service, which assumes the design concepts for the two buildings are similar.
Attend up to two design review meetings at BCJ offices in San Francisco.
Review a construction document set selected by you. We will provide our written comments and recommended details on the drawing sheets. We suggest reviewing a 50% DD set. We have budgeted 30 hrs for this service, which assumes the construction documents for the two buildings are reviewed concurrently.
Review and comment on architect-generated specifications as related to the exterior enclosure subjects listed above. We have budgeted 8 hrs for this service.
Provide assistance in developing and refining exterior building systems and waterproofing components. This shall include details for transitions between systems. We have budgeted 30 hrs for this service.
We have included one hygrothermal analysis of a typical project wall. The analysis is of thermal and moisture migration through a 2-D wall section over time. The analysis aids in determining insulation values and confirming proper selection of vapor permeable or impermeable wall materials. We will provide a letter summarizing the analysis. We have budgeted 30 hrs (approximately $5,000) for this analysis.
Construction Documents Phase
We will provide the following services during this phase:
Review one construction document set (to be selected by you). We will provide our written comments and recommended details on the drawing sheets. We suggest reviewing a 50% CD set. We have budgeted 40 hrs for this service.
Attend up to two design review meetings at BCJ offices in San Francisco.
Review a check set of drawings before production of 100% CDs. We have budgeted 10 hrs for this service.
Review and comment on architect-generated specification as related to the exterior enclosure subjects listed above. We have budgeted 12 hrs for this service. Mr. Gregory Mottola - 3 - 3 December 2014
Review the design concept and provide assistance in developing and refining exterior building systems and waterproofing components. This shall include details for transitions between systems. We have budgeted 30 hrs for this service.
Bidding
We will assist BCJ in responding to bidding questions. Hours for this task depend on the direction of the designer, but we have assumed 18 hrs for this scope.
Construction Administration Phase Services
We will provide part-time construction administration services for this project. Our services should not be construed as complete construction administration services; they are meant to complement the work BCJ is providing under their construction administration services agreement. We will visit the project site when directed by BCJ.
We will provide the following services for the below grade and plaza waterproofing construction administration phase:
Preconstruction meetings with the Architect, Owner’s representatives, and the Contractor to discuss the scope and installation of the waterproofing. We assume two preconstruction meetings for the fenestration flashing and roofing.
Review waterproofing shop drawings and submittals, finished and checked by the general contractor, for general compliance with the intent and requirements of the waterproofing portion of the bid documents. Shop drawings for each trade are to be submitted complete. Partial submittals will not be reviewed. The initial review and one follow-up review are included. We have assumed 40 hrs as the basis for this task.
Visits to the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction to review the work in progress. We will not direct the work and we will have no responsibility for the Contractor’s means and methods. Each visit assumes a four hour site visit, travel time, and 2 hrs of office follow-up. For each site visit we will generate a field report and provide photographs. We have budgeted for a total of eight site visits, which includes two visits for first installation of waterproofing. Additional requested site visits are $1,850/visit.
Assist in reviewing field conditions and preparing clarifications to the contract documents. These tasks are typically tracked with RFIs. We have assumed 60 hrs for this task, which typically translates into 25-28 RFIs, depending on RFI complexity.
Work in addition to this scope can be performed at the rates included in the attached schedule once authorized by you.
1.2 Add Alternate 1 – Underground Garage
Alternate 1 (listed as Alternate 2 in the Cost Plan) is a forty-two space underground parking garage located beneath the police and city administration building. Walls are expected to be waterproofed and backfilled. The ground level podium is cast in place concrete. Underslab Mr. Gregory Mottola - 4 - 3 December 2014
waterproofing or vapor retarders are not defined. We have assumed the bottom level of the garage will be in or near the ground water table.
Add Alternate 1 – Design Development
In addition to the above-described Base Project, we will review the geotechnical report and provide a letter summarizing our recommendations for below-grade waterproofing systems. We will perform the tasks described for the Base Project Design Development as they apply to the below-grade waterproofing systems (excepting the hygrothermal analysis). We estimate 20 hrs in addition to the Base Project Design Development Phase.
Add Alternate 1 – Construction Documents
In addition to the above-described Base Project, we will perform the tasks described for the Base Project Construction Documents as they apply to the below-grade waterproofing systems. We estimate 40 hrs in addition to the Base Project Construction Document Phase.
Add Alternate 1 – Bidding
In addition to the above-described Base Project, we will perform the tasks described for the Base Project Permitting/Bidding as they apply to the below-grade waterproofing systems. We estimate 6 hrs in addition to the Base Project Construction Document Phase.
Add Alternate 1 – Construction Administration
In addition to the above-described Base Project, we will perform the tasks described for the Base Project Construction Documents as they apply to the below-grade waterproofing systems. We estimate 45 hrs that will include a preconstruction meeting and review of submittals and RFIs, plus two site visits in addition to the Base Project Construction Document Phase.
1.3 Alternate 2 – Sustainable Design
This alternate is not yet defined. We have not provided an estimated fee for this alternate.
1.4 Alternate 3 – Town Hall Reuse
Alternate 3 (defined as Alternate 1 in the Cost Plan) is a modification to the existing Town Hall. The modifications described in the Cost Plan include strengthening that we assume will require roof cutting and patching. Existing windows will be restored with “high performance aluminum glazing.”
Add Alternate 3 – Design Development
In addition to the above-described Base Project, we will perform the tasks described for the Base Project Design Development as they apply to the reuse of the existing Town Hall (excepting the hygrothermal analysis). We expect the building enclosure effort will focus on roof replacement and flashing integration with new windows. We estimate 40 hrs in addition to the Base Project Design Development Phase.
Mr. Gregory Mottola - 4 - 3 December 2014
waterproofing or vapor retarders are not defined. We have assumed the bottom level of the garage will be in or near the ground water table.
Add Alternate 1 – Design Development
In addition to the above-described Base Project, we will review the geotechnical report and provide a letter summarizing our recommendations for below-grade waterproofing systems. We will perform the tasks described for the Base Project Design Development as they apply to the below-grade waterproofing systems (excepting the hygrothermal analysis). We estimate 20 hrs in addition to the Base Project Design Development Phase.
Add Alternate 1 – Construction Documents
In addition to the above-described Base Project, we will perform the tasks described for the Base Project Construction Documents as they apply to the below-grade waterproofing systems. We estimate 40 hrs in addition to the Base Project Construction Document Phase.
Add Alternate 1 – Bidding
In addition to the above-described Base Project, we will perform the tasks described for the Base Project Permitting/Bidding as they apply to the below-grade waterproofing systems. We estimate 6 hrs in addition to the Base Project Construction Document Phase.
Add Alternate 1 – Construction Administration
In addition to the above-described Base Project, we will perform the tasks described for the Base Project Construction Documents as they apply to the below-grade waterproofing systems. We estimate 45 hrs that will include a preconstruction meeting and review of submittals and RFIs, plus two site visits in addition to the Base Project Construction Document Phase.
1.3 Alternate 2 – Sustainable Design
This alternate is not yet defined. We have not provided an estimated fee for this alternate.
1.4 Alternate 3 – Town Hall Reuse
Alternate 3 (defined as Alternate 1 in the Cost Plan) is a modification to the existing Town Hall. The modifications described in the Cost Plan include strengthening that we assume will require roof cutting and patching. Existing windows will be restored with “high performance aluminum glazing.”
Add Alternate 3 – Design Development
In addition to the above-described Base Project, we will perform the tasks described for the Base Project Design Development as they apply to the reuse of the existing Town Hall (excepting the hygrothermal analysis). We expect the building enclosure effort will focus on roof replacement and flashing integration with new windows. We estimate 40 hrs in addition to the Base Project Design Development Phase.
Mr. Gregory Mottola - 5 - 3 December 2014
Add Alternate 3 – Construction Documents
In addition to the above-described Base Project, we will perform the tasks described for the Base Project Construction Documents as they apply to the existing Town Hall reuse. We expect the building enclosure effort will focus on roof replacement and flashing integration with new windows. We estimate 50 hrs in addition to the Base Project Construction Document Phase.
Add Alternate 3 – Bidding
In addition to the above-described Base Project, we will perform the tasks described for the Base Project Permitting/Bidding as they apply to the below-grade waterproofing systems. We estimate 12 hrs in addition to the Base Project Construction Document Phase.
Add Alternate 3 – Construction Administration
In addition to the above-described Base Project, we will perform the tasks described for the Base Project Construction Documents as they apply to the below-grade waterproofing systems. We estimate 50 hrs that will include a preconstruction meeting and review of submittals and RFIs, plus three site visits in addition to the Base Project Construction Document Phase.
1.5 Alternate 4 – Upgrade Site
Alternate 4 does not appear to affect building enclosure scope. We have not provided an estimated fee for this alternate.
1.6 Alternate 5 – Ballistic Sheathing
Alternate 5 does not appear to substantially affect building enclosure scope compared to the base bid. We have not provided an estimated fee for this alternate.
2. FEE
For the scope of work described above, we suggest you establish the budgets listed in the table below.
Base Project Labor Expenses Design Documents $25,000 $500 Construction Documents $20,000 $500 Bidding $3,000 $200 Construction Administration $34,000 $2,500 Total $82,000 $3,700 Alternate 1 – Parking Garage Labor Expenses Design Documents $3,500 $200 Construction Documents $7,000 $200 Bidding $1,500 $200 Construction Administration $11,000 $800 Total $23,000 $1,400 The Preview Group | Accessibility FIRM BIO
FIRM PROFILE
The Preview Group, Inc. (Preview) is an architectural consulting firm that specializes in providing regulatory solutions for our clients. We are experts in building codes, accessibility for persons with disabilities, regulatory issues affecting construction and construction document quality assurance review. The firm, established in 1986, provides services to building designers, owners and local code enforcement agencies. We help our clients determine the best path toward achieving building code compliance and construction document quality so that they may meet their goals.
Preview has played a major role in gaining code approval for a wide variety of projects for varied clients, both in the private sector and for governmental agencies. Recent projects include the seismic upgrade and renovation of the historic War Memorial Veterans Building in San Francisco’s Civic Center and new student centers for the Santa Rosa Junior College and at the CSU Sonoma and San Marcos campuses. Other recent Preview projects include: the Oconee County Courthouse in South Carolina, the National Underground Railroad Freedom Center in Cincinnati, the Textile Museum in Washington DC, and an accessibility survey of housing at Merrill College at University of California Santa Cruz, the renovation of the UCSC Hay Barn and an 8-story conference center and hotel for visiting scholars at UCLA.
The Preview Group, Inc. has two offices providing nationwide service. The home office is in Cincinnati, Ohio. The west coast office is located in Berkeley, California in the San Francisco Bay Area. The services offered by our two offices include: code compliance reviews for new and existing buildings; accessibility consultation on the ADA, the Federal Fair Housing Act and on local building code and accessibility regulations; building and access code seminars; contract plan review; expert witness consultation and testimony regarding building code and accessibility issues. Preview also performs construction document quality assurance and constructability reviews.
Our six person firm is deliberately kept small so that the four principals: David Collins, FAIA/CBO; Steven Winkel, FAIA/PE/CASp; Greg Nicholls, AIA/CBO and Sarah Rice CBO can work directly with our clients. Three of the principals, David Collins, Greg Nicholls and Sarah Rice are Certified Building Officials and have extensive experience as both project designers and code officials. This experience on both sides of the permit counter gives Preview a unique perspective on regulatory issues. David Collins, FAIA/CBO, firm founder and President, is recognized as an expert on the International Building Code. He has well over forty years of experience in code use and interpretation as a Building Official as well as having been an architectural project manager and a representative in the building code development process for several national building materials trade groups. Steven Winkel, FAIA, PE, CASp, West Coast office manager, has over forty years of experience as a project manager, code consultant and quality assurance manager. He is a California licensed architect, licensed civil engineer, licensed landscape architect and a Certified Access Specialist (CASp), a California certification recognizing extraordinary knowledge in the field of disabled accessibility assessment and compliance. Steve is now serving in his fourth four-year term as the Architect Commissioner on the California Building Standards Commission. He is also a member of the Board of Directors of the National Institute of Building Sciences.
Preview participates actively in code development at the national, state, and local level. We take great pride in being recognized for our leadership in the strategic development and implementation of solutions for our clients for such things as: solving building code-related problems, providing client representation during the building and zoning appeals process, providing expert witness advice and testimony, performing quality assurance reviews and providing contract plan review services for various jurisdictions. In recognition of our expertise in code development Preview has for several years been engaged by the American Institute of Architects as code consultants to assist the AIA in monitoring and participating in building and accessibility code development processes throughout the nation. In addition, both Dave Collins and Steven Winkel have received the prestigious designation of Fellows of the American Institute of Architects in recognition of their work in building code development and code education. RESUMES
Steven R Winkel, FAIA, PE, CASp
The Preview Group, Inc. Profile 2765 Prince Street Steve joined the firm in 2005 and currently manages the firm’s San Francisco Bay Area Berkeley, CA 94705 office. Steve has 45 years’ experience as an architect, engineer, landscape architect and tel/fax 510.547.7748 Certified Access Specialist, and has co‐authored several illustrative and interpretive email swinkel@preview‐group.com building code publications. Steve served on the Board of Directors of The American Institute of Architects (AIA) and as the chair of the AIA Codes and Standards Committee. He
is once again a member of the AIA National Codes and Standards Committee. Steve is currently in his twelfth year as the Architect Commissioner on the California Building Standards Commission. He is also a member of the Board of Directors of the National Institute of Building Sciences. With his experience as an architect and civil engineer, his expertise as an access specialist and in project management, code analysis and quality assurance reviews, Steve brings a unique perspective and broad knowledge base to the firm’s projects.
Certifications/Registrations Licensed Architect, California ‐ License No. C‐9284 Registered Civil Engineer, California ‐ License No. 31003 Licensed Landscape Architect, California ‐ License No. 1680 Certified Access Specialist, California ‐ Certificate No. CASp‐062
Significant Awards Fellow of the American Institute of Architects (FAIA) (1997) AIA California Council Presidential Citation (1993) San Francisco Airport International Terminal Honor Award for Interior Architecture, AIA San Francisco Chapter (2002) Honor Award for Architecture, AIA San Francisco Chapter (2001) Honor Award for Architecture, AIA California Council (2001) “Best of Show” Honor Award, AIA San Francisco Chapter (2001) African American Museum and Library of Oakland Preservation Design Award ‐ Rehabilitation/Adaptive Re‐use, California Preservation Foundation (2003) Oakland City Hall Renovation Merit Award: AIA California Council (1998) Architectural Award: AIA East Bay Chapter (1996) National Preservation Honor Award ‐ National Trust for Historic Preservation (1996) Preservation Design Award: California Preservation Foundation (1996)
Affiliations and Memberships American Institute of Architects (AIA) Member and Fellow American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Member International Code Council (ICC) Professional Member National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) Member, Board of Directors San Francisco Planning & Urban Research (SPUR) Member National Trust for Historic Preservation Member
Resume Page | 1 SCOPE OF WORK
November 24, 2014
At erton ivic enter Scope o or or Accessi ilit onsulting Services
Scope items are taken from the P. Items not relevant to the scope of work for The Preview Group, Inc. Preview have been omitted. Code analysis for accessibility consulting should take place early in the planning, conceptual design and schematic design Thus processes. , Preview s work is front loaded with design analysis and recommendations made early in the design process so that access for persons with disabilities can be integrated into the design process from the earliest stages. or the scope of this project, access will include careful analysis of parking, pedestrian movements on the site s between building and site elements and inside the s building for both public and employee accessibility to public service functions and to gathering spaces.
Note that travel time is included in meeting attendance time estimates, whether with the design team or in Atherton, as appropriate. ileage and per diem e penses for meeting attendance are part of our overhead and will not be a reimbursable e pense. We anticipate that all of our accessibility review will be done by annotations of drawings prepared by the design s team or a written reports. Accordingly, we anticipate no reimbursable e penses for reproduction, or for any . other e penses
Preview anticipates it will not participate in the following additive alternates if they are accepted, since their scope is not relevant to disabled access
• Add Alternate 2 Sustainable Design • Add Alternate Additional Ballistic Sheathing
RFP Scope Preview Item Hours as 1 aster Plan Review 8 1 1 Su as 1 Pro ect Initiation 1.1.1 nce the Notice to Proceed has Preview been issued, will review the approved aster Plan 1 documents and Survey drawings in preparation for the Project ickoff eeting. 1.1.2 Preliminary Budget eview. 1 Preview will work with the Project Team to identify overall budget goals and establish breakdown for construction , costs project costs and appropriate contingencies related to disabled access. 1 Su as Anal sis o t e aster Plan isting Site and onstraints 1.2.1 Initial Site Tour 2 Preview will tour of the Civic Center site to begin refining the design and technical opportunities and constraints of the site for disabled access. 1.2.2 Site Documentation 1 The Town will appropriate provide documentation of . the site Preview will evaluate this material and determine if it is sufficient for this phase for disabled access . design 1.2.3 Additional Site Analysis 2 Preview will build upon the preliminary analysis completed under aster the Plan and prepare an analytical base ng plan, mappi factors that might the influence accessibility of the design. These include diagrams of e isting vehicular and pedestrian flow patterns and block footprints of the building area and required parking.
The Preview Group, Inc. Accessibility Consulting Scope of Work Atherton Civic Center November 24, 2014
RFP Scope Preview Item Hours 1.2.4 Additional Research 1 Preview will review the Town's guidelines for determining parking requirements related to disabled access CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PHASE 12 2.0 Task 2: Conceptual Design 2.1 Sub-‐Task 1: Site Development 2.1.1 Initial Site Development 1 Preview will explore issues of adjacencies , circulation, parking (including underground parking), outdoor space, and scale to the site as they relate to disabled . access 2.1.2 Preliminary Site Development Plans 1 Once the critical issues have been identified, including the potential underground for an garage, Preview will review several alternatives prepared by the Design for Team site development that show various approaches to these issues. Preview will explore the relative merits of the various as approaches they relate to disabled access. 2.2 Sub-‐Task 2: Building Development 2.2.1 Initial Building Development 2 Once the Master Plan has been various studied with the site development Preview plans, will begin a more detailed study of the building program various and approaches to organizing the program elements as they relate to disabled access. 2.3 Sub-‐Task 3: Conceptual Design Alternatives 2.3.1 Initial Concept Alternatives 3 Once a few organizational alternatives Preview are selected, will review a series of actual concept alternatives incorporate that the opportunities and constraints ntified ide in the site development studies. This should incorporate all Identified Add Alternates, as necessary. Preview will review up to six (6) Initial Concept Alternatives. 2.4 Sub-‐Task 4: Draft Final Concept Plan 2.4.1 Draft Final Concept Plan 1 Based on direction established in the Preview previous task, will review single a Draft Final Concept Plan as presented to the Project Team for disabled access. 2.5 Sub-‐Task 5: Technical Reviews 2.5.2 Planning / Building / Fire / Police / Utilities 2 Preliminary presentations will be made to appropriate agencies to identify critical issues for disabled access that are best addressed at this conceptual level. presentations These also serve as an early opportunity for contribution from agencies these and to establish familiarity with the project. 2.5.4 Preliminary Cost Estimate 1 Preview will work with Town's consultant (mack5) to confirm a construction conceptual and overall project cost mate esti meets the approved budget. 2.6 Sub-‐Task 6: Final Concept Plan 2.6.1 Review of Final Comments 1 Preview will meet with the Project Team to review comments generated by the various reviews of the Draft Final Concept Plan related to disabled access. SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE 20 3.0 Task 3: Schematic Design 3.1 Sub-‐Task 1: Project Management 3.1.7 Code Review 4
2 The Preview Group, Inc. Accessibility Consulting Scope of Work Atherton Civic Center November 24, 2014
RFP Scope Preview Item Hours Preview will document and update the preliminary code review done during concept design to document code requirements related to disabled and access formalize assumptions or f the development of the civic center. This document will be presented to planning, building, and fire department during reviews. 3.2 Sub-‐Task 2: Schematic Design Documentation 3.2.1 Program Evaluation 1 Preview will review and solicit comments from the Project Team to program identify and design issues, based upon Concept the Final Design package related to disabled access. 3.2.2 Architectural Schematic Development 4 Preview will review Schematic Design documents as they relate to disabled access. 3.2.3 Schematic Site Development 4 Preview will review Schematic Site Design documents as they relate to disabled access. 3.2.4 Preliminary Consultant Review 2 Preview will participate in a kick off to meeting review the project scope and schedule with the key consultants, including the civil, structural, mechanical, electrical engineers, landscape Architects nterior and i and lighting designers. Each consultant will review the progress of the schematic design, make recommendations, and identify key issues for disabled access that need to be tracked through design the process. 3.3 Sub-‐Task 3: Staff Review / Formal Submittals 3.3.2 Planning / Building / Fire / Police / Utilities 2 Preview will participate in preliminary presentations to appropriate agencies to identify critical issues related to disabled access that need to be addressed at the schematic level. 3.4 Sub-‐Task 4: Final Schematic Design 3.4.1 Revised Schematic Documents 2 Preview will recommend final modifications to the Schematic Documents to the Project Team. These revised documents will constitute Final the Schematic Design documents. 3.4.3 Schematic Cost Estimate 1 Based on the Final Schematic Preview Documents, will review the cost estimate inf ormation related to disabled access and assist the Project Team in reconciling the project scope and budget, including final decisions to move forward with any remaining additive alternates. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 8 4.0 Task 4: Design Development 4.1 Sub-‐Task 1: Project Management 4.1.1 Design Development Kickoff Meeting 1 Preview will meet with the Project Team to initiate Phase. the Design Development 4.2 Sub-‐Task 2: Review of Schematic Design 4.2.1 Review and modify design documents 1 Preview will review and solicit comments from the Project Team to design identify issues for disabled access, based upon the Schematic Design package and cost estimate. 4.3 Sub-‐Task 3: Building Development 4.3.1 Building Development 3 Preview will review the architectural development in as this it relates to disabled access. 4.5 Sub-‐Task 5: Cost Estimate 4.5.1 Cost Estimate Update 1 Preview will review the upda ted version of the estimate for probable construction cost at the completion of this phase as it relates to disabled . access Preview will
3 The Preview Group, Inc. Accessibility Consulting Scope of Work Atherton Civic Center November 24, 2014
RFP Scope Preview Item Hours review the information and assist in reconciling the project scope and budget. 4.7 Sub-‐Task 7: Town Submittals Assistance 4.7.1 Preview will provide the Project Team with existing project information and documentation 2 to make any required submittals related to disabled access, beyond those mentioned in the above tasks. Additional documentation, if required, can be provided as an additional service. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PHASE 8 5.0 Task 5: Construction Documents 5.1 Sub-‐Task 1: Construction Document Initiation 5.1.1 Construction Document Kickoff Meeting 1 Preview will meet with the Project Team to initiate the Construction Document Phase, to confirm each project cipant's parti role related to disabled access and proj to review the ect schedule and budget. 5.2 Sub-‐Task 2: Project Budget and Schedule 5.2.1 Project Budget 1 Prior to the next Preview phase, will review the estimate cost information with the Project Team for items related to disabled access to confirm bid strategies and bid alternates. Refer to task 4.5.1. 5.3 Sub-‐Task 3: Review of Design Development 5.3.1 Review and modify design documents 1 Preview will review and solicit comments from the Project Team to design identify issues related to disabled access, based upon the Design Development package and cost estimate. 5.4 Sub-‐Task 4: Construction Documentation 5.4.1 Building Development 2 Based upon the approved Design Development and any further adjustments in the scope or quality of the project, or in the construction budget authorized by the Project Team, Preview will review Construction Documents for items related to disabled access. 5.4.2 Final Documents 1 Following the cost estimate at 90% Preview completion, will recommend the scope of work and make final adjustments documents to the for items related to disabled . access 5.5 Sub-‐Task 5: Design & Coordination 5.6 Sub-‐Task 6: Cost Estimate 5.6.1 Cost Estimate Update 1 Preview will review the timate es for probable construction costs related to disabled access at 90% completion phase. of this 5.7 Sub-‐Task 7: Formal Submittals 5.7.1 Building Permit Application 1 Preview will assist the Town to make the applications and provide necessary the architectural documentation to meet the requirements of the Town's Reviewing Agencies as they relate to disabled access. BIDDING PHASE 6 6.0 Task 6: Project Bidding 6.1.1 Preview will assist the Town in obtaining bids and assist in awarding ring and prepa contracts 2 for construction for items related to disabled access 6.1.4 Preview will supplement and interpret the drawings and specifications as related questions 2 to disabled access arise to assist the Town in negotiations with bidders and trade
4 The Preview Group, Inc. Accessibility Consulting Scope of Work Atherton Civic Center November 24, 2014
RFP Scope Preview Item Hours contractors. 6.1.5 As required, Preview will prepare addenda for inclusion in notices to or bidders in contract 2 packages for items related to disabled to access advise trade contractors information of that would clarify the drawings and specifications as necessary to enable them to prepare and submit bids and enter into contracts. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION PHASE 12 7.0 Task 7: Construction Administration 7.4 Sub-‐Task 4: Review and Distribution of Information 7.4.1 Contractor Inquiries, Submittals, Proposed Change Orders 4 Preview will review contractor submittals, proposed change orders and information requests related to disabled and access provide comments to the Team. Project 7.4.2 Clarification to Documents 3 Preview will issue supplemental instructions necessary as through the Project Team to clarify the construction documents as related to disabled . access 7.5 Sub-‐Task 5: Project Closeout 7.5.1 Final Completion 3 When the contractor has substantially completed Preview the project, will make a detailed review of the visible work related to disabled access to note items that are incomplete or inconsistent with the documents and design intent, prior to the Town's occupation and acceptance of the completed buildings. 7.6 Sub-‐Task 6: Formal Submittals 7.6.1 Reviewing Agencies 2 Preview will assist the Town with their responsibility to file the that documents are required for governmental authorities jurisdiction having over the project for items related to disabled access. ADDITIVE ALTERNATES Add Alternate – 1 Underground Parking Structure 30 A1.1 Design Development 12 Preview will assist the Design Team in incorporating accessibility into the parking structure. Preview will provide code guidance for accessible design and annotate drawings related to accessible design. A1.2 Construction Documents 8 Preview will provide code guidance for accessible design and annotate drawings related to accessible design. A1.3 Bidding. 4 Preview will assist the design team with responses to bidder questions related to accessibility at the parking structure A1.4 Construction Administration 6 Preview will review contractor submittals, proposed change orders and information requests related to disabled and access provide comments to the Project Team Add Alternate 3 –Existing Town Hall Renovation -‐ and Re use 40 A3.1 Design Development 16 Preview will assist the Design Team in incorporating accessibility into the renovated Town Hall with special emphasis on accessibility for existing buildings and for historic resources. Preview will provide code guidance for accessible design and annotate drawings related to accessible design.
5 The Preview Group, Inc. Accessibility Consulting Scope of Work Atherton Civic Center November 24, 2014
RFP Scope Preview Item Hours A3.2 Construction Documents 12 Preview will provide code guidance for accessible design and annotate drawings related to accessible design. A3.3 Bidding. 6 Preview will assist the design team with responses to bidder questions related to accessibility at the renovated Town Hall A3.4 Construction Administration 6 Preview will review contractor submittals, proposed change orders and information requests related to disabled and access provide comments to the Project Team Add Alternate 4 –Upgraded Site Amenities 18 A3.1 Design Development 6 Preview will assist the Design Team in incorporating accessibility into upgraded site amenities. Preview will provide code guidance for accessible design and annotate drawings related to accessible design. A3.2 Construction Documents 4 Preview will provide code guidance for accessible design and annotate drawings related to accessible design. A3.3 Bidding. 4 Preview will assist the design team with responses to bidder questions related to accessibility at upgraded the site amenities A3.4 Construction Administration 4 Preview will review contractor submittals, proposed change orders and information requests related to disabled and access provide comments to the Project Team
6 Oppenheim Lewis | Cost Consulting FIRM BIO
Oppenheim Lewis was founded in 1984 by Paul Oppenheim and Scott Lewis and started as a partnership, which was then incorporated in 1992 as a California Corporation. We qualify under each of the local, state and federal level guidelines as a small business. Our style of work is collaborative, both internally and externally, and both current principals in the firm participate at some level on almost of the projects we work on. As a small business, we make a commitment to each of our clients that guarantees the involvement of key individuals throughout the life of each project; the firm’s principals are personally dedicated to each project we undertake.
Oppenheim Lewis provides innovative and wide-ranging consulting services for a variety of types of clients, of whom roughly ~75% have been cultural educational institutions over the past twenty years. Most of our projects for education-focused (not-for-profit) organizations have been funded through a combination of public and private funding streams; many of our clients work in partnership with public/civic agencies; and a majority occupy public land through a leased or shared basis. One of the defining characteristics of our work is the niche nature of our projects: our client’s projects are one of-a- kind and each project meaningfully changes the life of the institution.
A key area of concern for all projects is managing for not only on-budget and on-schedule delivery, but actually managing the project’s ability to deliver the programmatic requirements within the established budget and schedule. We bring extensive experience in developing project budgets, funding profiles, evaluating life cycle costs, value engineering and managing budgets throughout the project. This comprehensive cost management includes coordinating project budgets with fundraising/financing schedules and the start of operations.
RESUMES
Oppenheim Lewis
Scott B. Lewis
Education: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1984 B.S. Mechanical Engineering
Employment: 1984 - 1987 Self Employed, San Francisco, CA Cost Consultant 1987 - Present Oppenheim Lewis, Inc., San Francisco, CA Founding Principal
Scott Lewis is Founding Principal of the San Francisco based construction consulting firm Oppenheim Lewis, Inc. Mr. Lewis provides leadership to the firm’s projects, and one of his primary roles is to work with our clients to develop preliminary budgeting and scope strategies for overall cost management.
Select Client/Projects List:
Cupertino Civic Center & Library San Mateo Main Library, Temporary Libraries & Branch Libraries Belvedere Tiburon Library Expansion Prewett Park Community Center
SCOPE OF WORK
Oppenheim Lewis Scope Description Atherton Civic Center
General Description The work includes two new buildings: the first to house the police department and other administrative functions at approximately 24,000sf; and the second to house a new library at approximately 9,000sf. There is approximately 200,000sf of sitework. In addition, there are five alternates which are to be priced as part of the project: 1) an underground garage of approximately 38,000sf; 2) a LEED Platinum or Net Zero building; 3) renovation of the existing Town Hall of approximately 1,800sf; 4) improve the quality of site paving and furnishings; and 5) provide an additional 1,250sf of ballistic sheathing to the police station building.
Oppenheim Lewis (OLI) will be providing cost consulting services for the construction cost of the project and. OLI will be producing all the construction costs; the. We would like the owner (ie the owner’s representative) to produce the overall budgets. We would propose to produce the construction cost only.
1.0 Master Plan Review Phase Oppenheim Lewis will be providing the following services:
Subtask 1.1.2: Identify overall project goals and establish breakdown for construction costs, project costs and contingencies. OLI will participate in one meeting and provide the construction cost breakdown outline as work product. 10 hours of time required.
Subtask 1.4: Project budget and schedule. OLI will produce the construction cost as work product and will coordinate with the architect who will be producing the project schedule. OLI will participate in three meetings. 14 hours of time required.
2.0 Conceptual Design Phase Oppenheim Lewis will be providing the following services:
Subtasks 2.1 and 2.2: Building and site development analysis. No work per the scoping document.
Subtask 2.3: Comparative analysis. OLI will produce conceptual level costs to support up to six initial alternatives and two final alternatives. The costs will be produced at a conceptual level without full engineering input. 50 hours of time required. Can we eliminate this scope? Or agree to meet with you to talk through the major cost differences but not produce conceptual costs? Assuming the latter – that we consult but do not produce estimates allow 24 hours.
Subtask 2.5.4: Preliminary cost estimate: OLI will produce the preliminary construction cost estimate for one conceptual design for the buildings and site. The estimate will include costs for each of the five project alternates.. 40hours of time required.
Subtask 2.6 Final concept plan. OLI will update the preliminary cost estimate and coordinate with the architect on any schedule updates. 26 hours of time required.
3.0 Schematic Design Phase
Subtask 3.1.2: Initial budget review at the start of the phase. OLI will attend one meeting. 4 hours required.
Subtask 3.1.5: Project delivery methods. OLI will attend one meeting and confirm consistency with the construction costs. 4 hours required.
Subtask 3.2.6 60% Schematic Design cost estimate. OLI will produce the construction cost estimate for all of the construction work and for the five project alternates. 68 hours of time required.
Subtask 3.4.3 100% Schematic Design cost estimate. OLI will produce the construction cost estimate for all of the construction work and for the five project alternates.. We will attend three meetings, two with the design team and one with the design team and owner. We also assume we will be reconciling with Mack5. 76 hours of time required.
4.0 Design Development Phase
Subtask 4.1.2: Initial budget review at the start of the phase. OLI will attend one meeting. 4 hours required.
Subtask 4.2.1: Review of Schematic Design documents. OLI will attend one meeting and confirm consistency with the construction costs. 4 hours required.
Subtask 4.5.1 100% Design Development cost estimate. OLI will produce the construction cost estimate for all of the construction work and for up to five project alternates.. We will attend three meetings, two with the design team and one with the design team and owner. We also assume we will be reconciling with Mack5. 96 hours of time required.
5.0 Construction Documents Phase
Subtask 5.1.2: Initial budget review at the start of the phase. OLI will attend one meeting. 4 hours required.
Subtask 5.2.1: Review of documents and discuss bid strategies and alternates. OLI will attend one meeting and confirm consistency with the construction costs. 4 hours required.
Subtask 5.6.1 90% Construction Documents cost estimate. OLI will produce the construction cost estimate for all of the construction work and for up to five project alternates. We will attend three meetings, two with the design team and one with the design team and owner. We also assume we will be reconciling with Mack5. 116 hours of time required.
6.0 Bidding Phase
Subtask 6.1: Assist with bid review. OLI will attend one meeting. 12 hours required. Jay Farbstein & Associates | Public Safety and Facility Planning FIRM BIO
Jay Farbstein & Associates, Inc. Public Safety Facility Planning Experience
PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY
PLANNING EXPERIENCE
INTRODUCTION Jay Farbstein & Associates, Inc. has broad experience in planning public safety facilities.
• We have planned a wide range of public safety facilities, including:
- city police facilities - county sheriff’s departments and substations - state police headquarters - correctional facilities - border crossing stations - fire stations
• We understand the special needs of law enforcement and public safety organizations:
- carefully considering the interface with the public to balance security with public service - providing for special functions such as dispatch and emergency operations, detention, evidence handling and storage, crime and photo labs, report writing, squad rooms, briefing and training, locker rooms, vehicle maintenance, and the like. - working with the special culture of law enforcement.
• We are experts on prisoner holding facilities, having planned many correction and detention facilities.
• We fully understand operational and facility security planning and lead our clients through a structured process of considering threats and appropriate responses to them.
• In planning for public safety facilities, we employ a range of methods, from statistical projections of the need for patrol officers and other staff, to interactive facility planning techniques such as focus and advisory groups, to functional and architectural programming, and graphic presentation of results.
FEATURED PROJECTS
City of Tracy – Public Safety JFA provided operational, space, and adjacency requirements for police and Master Plan fire facilities as a basis for development impact fees as consultant to Indigo Architects (2010).
[Illustration from Indigo?]
Page 1 RESUMES
Jay Farbstein & Associates Justice Facilities Experience
Jay Farbstein, PhD, FAIA A principal of Jay Farbstein & Associates, Inc., Mr. Farbstein has more than 25 years of professional experience and is nationally recognized for his contributions in the field of criminal justice facility planning. Mr. Farbstein will be principal-in-charge for this project.
Mr. Farbstein has developed architectural programs, concept designs, facility and site evaluations and operational studies for numerous criminal justice facility projects. He developed system wide detention and criminal justice facility master plans for San Luis Obispo, Placer, Tulare, Kern and Fresno Counties in California as well as Linn, Benton and Lincoln Counties in Oregon and Washoe County (Reno) Nevada. He led the team which developed a master plan for, and programmed, $79 million worth of adult and juvenile correctional facilities for Bexar County (San Antonio), Texas.
Mr. Farbstein has been responsible for major design programs for a high technology federal office building, a master plan and program for the headquarters of the California Department of Motor Vehicles and Highway Patrol, three border stations (and a design guideline for all future land border stations), laboratories, medical and educational facilities. He has conducted post occupancy evaluations nationwide for the U.S. Postal Service and Department of Labor. Mr. Farbstein was part of the team for the ORBIT II study of office research into buildings and information technology, conducted by Harbinger/Xerox and supported by 20 major corporations, developers and government agencies and has recently applied the new office Servicability Tools and Methods for the federal General Services Administration in a pilot project in Chicago.
Mr. Farbstein was instrumental in developing the facility planning component of the National Institute of Corrections' "Planning of New Institutions" (PONI) program. With Richard Wener, he developed an award-winning correctional environment evaluation methodology for NIC and applied it to an evaluation of direct versus indirect supervision correctional facilities, including jails and prisons across the country. Under two grants from NIC, he assisted Contra Costa County in evaluating its new direct supervision jail and Orange County Florida with the development of model jail evaluation instruments. Under a grant from NIC, he recently led a team conducting audits of three jails in Massachusetts, Minnesota, and Florida and is assisting with an evaluation of the Arlington County (Virginia) jail. Mr. Farbstein organized NIC’s first two annual symposia on new generation jails and served on the board of directors of the Direct Supervision Institute.
Mr. Farbstein was project director and lead author of the Corrections Planning Handbooks for the California Board of Corrections. This was updated as a book by Mr. Farbstein, Correctional Facility Planning and Design published by Van Nostrand Reinhold. Also for the California Board of Corrections, he completed a cost-benefit
Page 1 Jay Farbstein & Associates Public Safety Experience
Greg Allen Barker, AIA Greg Allen Barker has a dual background in research methodologies and architecture that has enabled him to specialize in advanced planning services for public safety facilities during the last 25 years. He has managed and conducted all phases of facility planning, including needs assessment, strategic planning, master planning, system evaluation, and schematic design consulting.
Examples of Mr. Barker's work in system planning include:
• staffing analysis and facility evaluations for the police departments of Bakersfield and Davis; • criminal justice master plan for Placer County (including all sheriff’s functions, with Lionakis); • staffing and space needs analysis for the police and fire departments of Pismo Beach, Santa Maria, Tracy, and Patterson.
Mr. Barker has also provided long-term facility planning services for law enforcement agencies:
• programming for a new Sheriff's Department headquarters and two substations in San Luis Obispo County; • programming and design consulting for a replacement police station in the Hollenbeck Division for the City of Los Angeles (with AC Martin Partners); • staffing and space projections for California Highway Patrol Headquarters (with Lionakis).
Mr. Barker is a registered architect in Nevada, California, and Oregon as well as an NCARB certificate holder. The American Collegiate Schools of Architecture, Amoco, and the University of Illinois have all presented Mr. Barker with awards for his research. Mr. Barker holds a bachelor’s degree in architecture from California Polytechnic State University and a Master of Architecture degree from the University of Illinois. He served on the board of directors of the Environmental Design Research Association, is a member of the American Institute of Architects, and sits on committee E06.25 of ASTM International.
Page 1 SCOPE OF WORK
CITY OF ATHERTON – SCOPE OF POLICE FACILITY CONSULTING
UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT SCOPE
• JFA will work with the client and A/E team to verify the space program and add additional programmatic detail as appropriate to an 8 week schedule. This will focus on operational assumptions that will affect the design; circulation and adjacencies; validation and modification of the space program; acoustical, lighting, and ventilation; and systems and fixed furnishings, unique to police operations. • JFA will work with the client to identify operational security requirements for use by a security consultant to specify security and related low voltage systems. • JFA will attend team meetings at BCJ’s direction (the fee proposal includes two JFA professionals to each attend one day of meetings). • JFA will conduct a design review prior to each key submittal during conceptual, SD, DD, and CD phases of work. • Documentation will be focused on the internal needs of the A/E team, with the expectation that distribution is limited to the Town’s Project Team for review and comment. • JFA’s work will not include city hall or library functions. • JFA’s work will not include community involvement tasks.
SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR POLICE FACILITY CONSULTING
1.5 Subtask 5: Program Review/Revisions.
The strategy for this task will be to validate program information provided in the master plan and work with user groups to add a level of detailed design requirements achievable within an eight week schedule. A single set of activities will address the police-‐related requirements of both Tasks 1.5.1 Prioritization of Program Elements and 1.5.2 Outdoor Space Program. For the workshops described below, the consultants will meet with the Town’s Project Team, design architects, and specialists from the police department on an as-‐needed basis. Each workshop is assumed to last one day.
1.5a: Operational Requirements : Workshop This workshop will focus on the operational requirements of each functional area of the police facility. It will begin with an orientation to the programming process, followed by approximately one-‐hour segments dealing with each major functional area identified in the space program from the master plan. Outdoor functions will also be identified and discussed. Topics will include the operational role of each major function, the activities, circulation of people and materials within and between major functional areas, and operational security requirements. Major decisions will be documented for review at the next workshop.
Atherton Civic Center – Scope of Police Facility Consulting Jay Farbstein & Associates Bohlin for Cywinski Jackson 1 of 2
1.5d: Program Documentation: The results of the programming workshops will be compiled into a program report consisting of a narrative, revised space program, and adjacency diagrams to guide the design team during subsequent phases of work. The work products will be submitted to the design architect and Town’s Project Team for review and comment, and revised as necessary. It is assumed that project standards for construction, finishes, ambient lighting, and so on will be developed by BCJ for the project as a whole, while documentation for the police facility will focus on requirements that are unique or vary from the norm.
Tasks 3, 4, and 5 -‐ A/E Team Meetings : and Design Reviews
The consultant will contribute to and/or review the submittals identified below from the perspective of the operational and design requirements of the police facility program.
2.0 Attendance at A/E team : meetings JFA will participate in A/E team meetings at the pleasure of BCJ. Each meeting is assumed to take place during one day with travel. Two meetings are included in the fee proposal – one each for Farbstein and Barker.
2.3.1 Initial Concept Alternatives: The consultant will meet with the design team to discuss initial concept alternatives before they are finalized for presentation to the Town’s Project Team and the community.
2.4.2 Draft Final Concept : Plan The consultant will review and comment on the scheme before it is finalized for presentation to the client.
3.1.8 Quality Control and Design Team Sub-‐consultant : Coordination The consultant will meet with the design team to review the 60% SD submittal before it is finalized for submission to the client.
3.4.1 Revised Schematic Documents: The consultant will review and comment on the final SD submittal before it is finalized for submission to the client.
4.4.1 Design Team Design : Development The consultant will review and comment on the final DD submittal before it is finalized for submission to the client.
5.2.5 Review and Quality : Control The consultant will review and comment on the 50%, 90%, and final CD submittals before they are finalized for submission to the client.
Atherton Civic Center – Scope of Police Facility Consulting Jay Farbstein & Associates Bohlin for Cywinski Jackson 2 of 2