Eubacteria, Halobacteria, and the Origin of Photosynthesis: the Photocytes (Evolution/Ribosome Structure/Parsimony/Eocytes/Eukaryotes) JAMES A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eubacteria, Halobacteria, and the Origin of Photosynthesis: the Photocytes (Evolution/Ribosome Structure/Parsimony/Eocytes/Eukaryotes) JAMES A 7154 Correction Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82 (1985) Correction. In the article "Eubacteria, halobacteria, and the Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (82, 3716-3720), Fig. 1 was reproduced origin of photosynthesis: The photocytes" by James A. badly and an incorrect version of Fig. 6 was published. A Lake, Michael W. Clark, Eric Henderson, Shawn P. Fay, better reproduction of Fig. 1 and the correct version of Fig. Melanie Oakes, Andrew Scheinman, J. P. Thornber, and 6 are shown below. R. A. Mah, which appeared in number 11, June 1985, ofProc. Archae- Eo- Photocytes bacteria cytes (Photosynthesis) FIG. 6. Rooted evolutionary tree illustrating eubacteria and halobacteria as sublines of the monophyletic group, the photocytes. This tree shows the phylogenetic relationships among the photo- cytes, archaebacteria, and eocytes. The eubacterial and halobacte- rial branches of the photocytes are marked by diagonal lines. The possible photosynthetic common ancestor is indicated. This tree was ... ..'k rooted as described in ref. 5. 4i., . "*r'. ;$ V V.*- 11 FIG. 1. Electron micrographs of eubacterial (rows A-E) and halobacterial (rows F and G) ribosomal subunits. Small subunits in the asymmetric projection are shown in the first two columns, and large subunits in the quasi-symmetric projection (the L7/L12 stalk is to the right ofthe subunit) are shown in the third and fourth columns. The archaebacterial bills are indicated by arrows in rows F and G. The organisms represented are Chloroflexus aurantiacus (a green nonsulfur bacterium, row A), Thiocapsa pfennigii (a purple sulfur bacterium, row B), Rhodopseudomonas viridis (a purple nonsulfur bacterium, row C), Synechocystis 6701 (a cyanobacterium, row D), and Bacillus stearothermophilus (a nonphotosynthetic Gram-pos- itive thermophilic bacterium, row E). The halobacteria are Halobacterium cutirubrum (a halobacterium, row F) and Halococ- cus morrhuae (a halococcus, row G). (x225,000.) Downloaded by guest on October 2, 2021 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 82, pp. 3716-3720, June 1985 Evolution Eubacteria, halobacteria, and the origin of photosynthesis: The photocytes (evolution/ribosome structure/parsimony/eocytes/eukaryotes) JAMES A. LAKE*, MICHAEL W. CLARK*, ERIC HENDERSON*, SHAWN P. FAY*, MELANIE OAKES*, ANDREW SCHEINMAN*, J. P. THORNBER*, AND R. A. MAHt *Molecular Biology Institute and Department of Biology, and tSchool of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024 Communicated by Everett C. Olson, February 19, 1985 ABSTRACT The halobacteria and the photosynthetic ofphotosynthesis. This interpretation is supported by data on members of the eubacteria have previously been classified in the common denominators of photosynthesis, such as the two separate urkingdoms-the archaebacteria and the occurrence of identical types of carotenoids in both groups eubacteria, respectively. They were thought to be no more and their syntheses by essentially identical mechanisms (for closely related to each other than they each were to the reviews, see refs. 6 and 7). If this interpretation is correct, eukaryotes. In accord with this earlier classification, photo- then all halobacteria and all eubacteria, including synthesis was thought to have originated twice by independent nonphotosynthetic eubacteria, could be descendants of the events-once within the eubacteria and once within the same photosynthetic ancestor. archaebacteria. In this paper, however, using three- Evolutionarily, the eubacteria and halobacteria compose a dimensional ribosome structure as a probe of evolutionary monophyletic group, for which we propose the name divergences, we show that the eubacteria and the halobacteria "photocytes." As a group, the photocytes are more closely are more closely related to each other than they are to any other related to each other than they are to members of any other known organisms. The simplest interpretation of our data is urkingdom including the remaining archaebacteria that all extant photosynthetic cells are descended from a single (methanogens), the eukaryotes, or the eocytes. Hence, we common ancestor that possessed a primeval photosynthetic propose that halobacteria should be removed from the mechanism. Numerous data on the occurrence of related archaebacterial urkingdom and that urkingdom status be biochemical processes in halobacteria and eubacteria support given to the combined photosynthetic group, the "photo- this theory. Essential components of the photosynthetic ap- cyta," provided that other studies on their molecular proper- paratus, such as carotenoids, are present in both halobacteria ties confirm the proposed evolutionary tree. and in eubacteria, including the nonphotosynthetic eubacteria, suggesting that photosynthesis could be a primitive property of MATERIALS AND METHODS both groups. Our data indicate that together the eubacteria and the halobacteria form a monophyletic group for which we Ribosomes and ribosomal subunits from eubacteria, propose the name "photocytes." If other techniques of archaebacteria, eocytes, and eukaryotes were prepared as phylogenetic analysis cbnfirm this evolutionary tree, we pro- described (3, 5). Substitution of the buffer used to isolate pose that the photocytes be given urkingdom status. halobacterial ribosomes for that used to isolate eubacterial ribosomes produced no differences in ribosomal profiles. Photosynthetic bacteria have previously been classified in Subunits in these buffers were negatively stained by the two urkingdoms. The halobacteria are classified as double-layer carbon method. Relative sizes of eukaryotic, archaebacteria (1), whereas all other groups ofphotosynthet- archaebacterial, eocytic, and eubacterial subunits were de- ic bacteria are classified as eubacteria (2). As a result, it has termined by electron microscopy of pair-wise mixtures of been thought that photosynthesis was invented twice, once subunits from the groups. by archaebacteria and once by eubacteria. In this paper, we present evidence that photosynthesis, as exemplified by extant RESULTS photosynthetic bacteria, could have been invented once. Recently, techniques have been developed to use three- Electron micrographs of ribosomal subunits from repre- dimensional ribosome structure to probe evolutionary diver- sentative photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic eubacteria gences and most parsimoniously to determine uprooted evolu- and from halobacteria are shown in Fig. 1. Small subunits are tionary trees (3-5). In particular, it has been shown that a rift, shown in the first two columns and large subunits are shown even deeper than that between the eubacteria and the in the last two columns. These are interpreted in diagrams separates the eocytes (a group of sulfur me- below the columns from each group. The small subunits are archaebacteria, shown in the "asymmetric projection" (8) and large subunits tabolizing bacteria) from the other bacteria (5). This prompted are shown in the "quasi-symmetric projection" (8). Both us to investigate the details of the relationship between the projections are particularly useful for comparative purposes methanogenic and halophilic branches of the archaebacteria and have been used previously to compare the three- and to analyze their specific relationships with eubacteria. dimensional structures of archaebacterial, eubacterial, In this paper, we present data showing that the eubacteria eocytic, and eukaryotic subunits (5, 9). and the halobacteria are more closely related to each other The representative photosynthetic eubacteria include a than they are to any other known organisms. We interpret green nonsulfur bacterium (row A), a purple sulfur bacterium this to imply that both could be derived from a common (row B), a purple nonsulfur bacterium (row C), and a photosynthetic ancestor corresponding to a single invention cyanobacterium (row D). For comparison, micrographs of a nonphotosynthetic Gram-positive bacterium are also in- The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge cluded (row E). Ribosomes from Halobacterium cutirubrum payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" and from Halococcus morrhuae are shown in rows F and G, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. respectively. The structures of the halobacterial ribosomal 3716 Evolution: Lake et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82 (1985) 3717 In contrast, ribosomes of methanogens, eocytes, and eukaryotes (Fig. 2) are distinctly different from the I eubacterial-halobacterial type (see Table 1). Their separate types (9) are illustrated beneath the micrographs in Fig. 2. Features present in the three types of small subunits but lacking, or present in a significantly modified form, in eubacterial and halobacterial subunits include lobes at the base of the subunit (nearly absent in methanogens, of intermediate size in eocytes, and large in eukaryotes), a bifurcation bf the platform, and d gap at the base of the platform. Fields of small subunits from a methanogen, a eubacterium, and a halobacterium are shown from left to right, respectively, in Fig. 3. In large ribosomal subunits two features, lacking in eubacteria and halobacteria, are present in subunits from eocytes and eukaryotes. These are a lobe at the base ofthe subunits and a prominent bulge above the lobe and separated from it by a gap in eocytes. The gap is filled in eukaryotes. The profiles of the eocytic subunits, where they I l cQ I I I FIG. 1. Electron micrographs of eubacterial (rows A-E) and halobacterial (rows F and G) ribosomal
Recommended publications
  • Investigating the Effects of Simulated Martian Ultraviolet Radiation on Halococcus Dombrowskii and Other Extremely Halophilic Archaebacteria
    ASTROBIOLOGY Volume 9, Number 1, 2009 © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. DOI: 10.1089/ast.2007.0234 Special Paper Investigating the Effects of Simulated Martian Ultraviolet Radiation on Halococcus dombrowskii and Other Extremely Halophilic Archaebacteria Sergiu Fendrihan,1 Attila Bérces,2 Helmut Lammer,3 Maurizio Musso,4 György Rontó,2 Tatjana K. Polacsek,1 Anita Holzinger,1 Christoph Kolb,3,5 and Helga Stan-Lotter1 Abstract The isolation of viable extremely halophilic archaea from 250-million-year-old rock salt suggests the possibil- ity of their long-term survival under desiccation. Since halite has been found on Mars and in meteorites, haloar- chaeal survival of martian surface conditions is being explored. Halococcus dombrowskii H4 DSM 14522T was ex- posed to UV doses over a wavelength range of 200–400 nm to simulate martian UV flux. Cells embedded in a thin layer of laboratory-grown halite were found to accumulate preferentially within fluid inclusions. Survival was assessed by staining with the LIVE/DEAD kit dyes, determining colony-forming units, and using growth tests. Halite-embedded cells showed no loss of viability after exposure to about 21 kJ/m2, and they resumed growth in liquid medium with lag phases of 12 days or more after exposure up to 148 kJ/m2. The estimated Ն 2 D37 (dose of 37 % survival) for Hcc. dombrowskii was 400 kJ/m . However, exposure of cells to UV flux while 2 in liquid culture reduced D37 by 2 orders of magnitude (to about 1 kJ/m ); similar results were obtained with Halobacterium salinarum NRC-1 and Haloarcula japonica.
    [Show full text]
  • Emended Descriptions of Genera of the Family Halobacteriaceae
    International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (2009), 59, 637–642 DOI 10.1099/ijs.0.008904-0 Taxonomic Emended descriptions of genera of the family Note Halobacteriaceae Aharon Oren,1 David R. Arahal2 and Antonio Ventosa3 Correspondence 1Institute of Life Sciences, and the Moshe Shilo Minerva Center for Marine Biogeochemistry, Aharon Oren The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel [email protected] 2Departamento de Microbiologı´a y Ecologı´a and Coleccio´n Espan˜ola de Cultivos Tipo (CECT), Universidad de Valencia, 46100 Burjassot, Valencia, Spain 3Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sevilla, 41012 Sevilla, Spain The family Halobacteriaceae currently contains 96 species whose names have been validly published, classified in 27 genera (as of September 2008). In recent years, many novel species have been added to the established genera but, in many cases, one or more properties of the novel species do not agree with the published descriptions of the genera. Authors have often failed to provide emended genus descriptions when necessary. Following discussions of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of Halobacteriaceae, we here propose emended descriptions of the genera Halobacterium, Haloarcula, Halococcus, Haloferax, Halorubrum, Haloterrigena, Natrialba, Halobiforma and Natronorubrum. The family Halobacteriaceae was established by Gibbons rRNA gene sequence-based phylogenetic trees rather than (1974) to accommodate the genera Halobacterium and on true polyphasic taxonomy such as recommended for the Halococcus. At the time of writing (September 2008), the family (Oren et al., 1997). As a result, there are often few, if family contained 96 species whose names have been validly any, phenotypic properties that enable the discrimination published, classified in 27 genera.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Stress Proteins in Haloarchaea and Their Adaptive Response to Environmental Shifts
    biomolecules Review The Role of Stress Proteins in Haloarchaea and Their Adaptive Response to Environmental Shifts Laura Matarredona ,Mónica Camacho, Basilio Zafrilla , María-José Bonete and Julia Esclapez * Agrochemistry and Biochemistry Department, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Area, Faculty of Science, University of Alicante, Ap 99, 03080 Alicante, Spain; [email protected] (L.M.); [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (B.Z.); [email protected] (M.-J.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-965-903-880 Received: 31 July 2020; Accepted: 24 September 2020; Published: 29 September 2020 Abstract: Over the years, in order to survive in their natural environment, microbial communities have acquired adaptations to nonoptimal growth conditions. These shifts are usually related to stress conditions such as low/high solar radiation, extreme temperatures, oxidative stress, pH variations, changes in salinity, or a high concentration of heavy metals. In addition, climate change is resulting in these stress conditions becoming more significant due to the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events. The most relevant damaging effect of these stressors is protein denaturation. To cope with this effect, organisms have developed different mechanisms, wherein the stress genes play an important role in deciding which of them survive. Each organism has different responses that involve the activation of many genes and molecules as well as downregulation of other genes and pathways. Focused on salinity stress, the archaeal domain encompasses the most significant extremophiles living in high-salinity environments. To have the capacity to withstand this high salinity without losing protein structure and function, the microorganisms have distinct adaptations.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacteria and Archaea - Aharon Oren
    PHYLOGENETIC TREE OF LIFE - Bacteria And Archaea - Aharon Oren BACTERIA AND ARCHAEA Aharon Oren The Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. Keywords: Archaea, Bacteria, Bacteriological Code, Bergey‟s Manual, Nomenclature, Phylogenetic tree, Polyphasic taxonomy, Prokaryotes, 16S rRNA, Taxonomy, Species concept, Systematics Contents 1. Prokaryotes: The unseen majority 2. The species concept for the Prokaryotes 3. Bacteria and Archaea, the two domains of the prokaryotic world 4. The differences between Bacteria and Archaea 5. The Prokaryotes – a taxonomic overview 5.1. General considerations 5.2. The phyla of Bacteria 5.3. The phyla of Archaea 6. Prokaryotes: The uncultured majority Glossary Bibliography Biographical sketch Summary With an estimated number of 4-6x1030 cells, the prokaryotes are the most numerous organisms on earth. They inhabited our planet long before the eukaryotes evolved, and metabolically they are the most diverse group. Compared to the number of eukaryotic taxa the number of prokaryote genera and species described is surprisingly small. A little over 9,000 different species of prokaryotes have been named, and classified in nearly 2,000 genera. The naming of prokaryotes is regulated by the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Internationally approved rules for naming species exist, but there is no universally accepted species concept for the prokaryotes. For the description of new representatives a polyphasic approach is used, which includes determination of numerous phenotypic and genotypic properties. If necessary, the genomes of related strains are compared by DNA-DNA hybridization or full or partial genome sequence comparison. Since the 1970s comparative sequence analysis of small- subunit ribosomal RNA has revolutionized our views of prokaryote taxonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Hydrolytic Enzyme Capabilities of Halophilic Archaea Isolated from Hides and Skins and Their Phenotypic and Phylogenetic Identification by S
    33 DETERMinATION OF HYDROLYTic ENZYME CAPABILITIES OF HALOPHILIC ARCHAEA ISOLATED FROM HIDES AND SKins AND THEIR PHENOTYpic AND PHYLOGENETic IDENTIFicATION by S. T. B LG School of Health, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Terzioglu Campus Canakkale, Turkey, 17100. and B. MER ÇL YaPiCi Biology Department, Faculty of Arts and Science, Canakkale ONSEKIZ MART UNIVERSITY, TERZIOGLU CAMPUS, Canakkale, Turkey, 17100. and İsmail Karaboz Basic and Industrial Microbiology Section, Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Ege University, Bornova, İzmi r, Turkey, 35100. ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION This research aims to isolate extremely halophilic archaea The main constituent of the raw hide is protein, mainly from salted hides, to determine the capacities of their collagen (33% w/w), and remainder is moisture and fat. During hydrolytic enzymes, and to identify them by using phenotypic storage of raw hide, collagen’s excessive proteolysis by and molecular methods. Domestic and imported salted hide lysosomal autolysis or proteolytic bacterial enzymes can lead and skin samples obtained from eight different sources were to the disintegration of the structure of collagen fibers.1 used as the research material. 186 extremely halophilic Biodeterioration is among the major causes of impairment of microorganisms were isolated from salted raw hides and aesthetic, functional and other properties of leather and other skins. Some biochemical, antibiotic sensitivity, pH, NaCl, biopolymers or organic materials and the products made from temperature tolerance and quantitative and qualitative them. Due to the fact that prevention of biological degradation hydrolytic enzyme tests were performed on these isolates. In is very important in conservation and processing of leather, our study, taking into account the phenotypic findings of the great effort is being made for decontamination of these research, 34 of 186 isolates were selected.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal to Transfer Halococcus Turkmenicus, Halobacterium Trapanicum JCM 9743 and Strain GSL-11 to Haloterrigena Turkmenica Gen
    lntemational Journal of Systematic Bacteriology (1 999), 49, 13 1-1 36 Printed in Great Britain Proposal to transfer Halococcus turkmenicus, Halobacterium trapanicum JCM 9743 and strain GSL-11 to Haloterrigena turkmenica gen. nov., comb. nov. Antonio Ventosa,' M. Carmen Gutierrez,' Masahiro Kamekura2 and Michael L. Dyall-Smith3 Author for correspondence: Antonio Ventosa. Tel: + 349 5455 6765. Fax: + 349 5462 8162. e-mail : [email protected] 1 Department of The 165 rRNA gene sequences of Halococcus saccharolflicus and Halococcus Microbiology and salifodinae were closely related (94.5-94-7 YO similarity) to that of Halococcus Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of morrhuae, the type species of the genus Halococcus. However, Halococcus Seville, 41012 Seville, Spain turkmenicus was distinct from the other members of this genus, with low 165 2 Noda Institute for rRNA similarities when compared to Halococcus morrhuae (887 YO).On the Scientific Research, 399 basis of phylogenetic tree reconstruction, detection of signature bases and Noda, Noda-shi, Chiba-ken DNA-DNA hybridization data, it is proposed to transfer Halococcus 278-0037, Japan turkmenicus to a novel genus, Haloterrigena, as Haloterrigena turkmenica gen. 3 Department of nov., comb. nov., and to accommodate Halobacterium trapanicum JCM 9743 Microbiology and Immunology, University of and strain GSL-11 in the same species. On the basis of morphological, cultural Melbourne, Parkville 3052, and 165 rRNA sequence data, it is also proposed that the culture collection Australia strains
    [Show full text]
  • Haloferax Sulfurifontis Sp. Nov., a Halophilic Archaeon Isolated from a Sulfide- and Sulfur-Rich Spring
    International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (2004), 54, 2275–2279 DOI 10.1099/ijs.0.63211-0 Haloferax sulfurifontis sp. nov., a halophilic archaeon isolated from a sulfide- and sulfur-rich spring Mostafa S. Elshahed,1 Kristen N. Savage,1 Aharon Oren,2 M. Carmen Gutierrez,3 Antonio Ventosa3 and Lee R. Krumholz1 Correspondence 1Department of Botany and Microbiology, and Institute of Energy and the Environment, Mostafa S. Elshahed University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA [email protected] 2The Institute of Life Sciences and the Moshe Shilo Minerva Center for Marine Biogeochemistry, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel 3Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Seville, Seville, Spain A pleomorphic, extremely halophilic archaeon (strain M6T) was isolated from a sulfide- and sulfur-rich spring in south-western Oklahoma (USA). It formed small (0?8–1?0 mm), salmon pink, elevated colonies on agar medium. The strain grew in a wide range of NaCl concentrations + (6 % to saturation) and required at least 1 mM Mg2 for growth. Strain M6T was able to reduce sulfur to sulfide anaerobically. 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis indicated that strain M6T belongs to the family Halobacteriaceae, genus Haloferax; it showed 96?7–98?0 % similarity to other members of the genus with validly published names and 89 % similarity to Halogeometricum borinquense, its closest relative outside the genus Haloferax. Polar lipid analysis and DNA G+C content further supported placement of strain M6T in the genus Haloferax. DNA–DNA hybridization values, as well as biochemical and physiological characterization, allowed strain M6T to be differentiated from other members of the genus Haloferax.
    [Show full text]
  • Halococcus Dombrowskii Sp. Nov., an Archaeal Isolate from a Permian Alpine Salt Deposit
    International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (2002), 52, 1807–1814 DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.02278-0 Halococcus dombrowskii sp. nov., an archaeal isolate from a Permian alpine salt deposit 1 Institut fu$ r Genetik und Helga Stan-Lotter,1 Marion Pfaffenhuemer,1 Andrea Legat,1 Allgemeine Biologie, 2,3 1 1 Hellbrunnerstrasse 34, Hans-Ju$ rgen Busse, Christian Radax and Claudia Gruber A-5020 Salzburg, Austria 2 Institut fu$ r Bakteriologie, Author for correspondence: Helga Stan-Lotter. Tel: j43 662 8044 5756. Fax: j43 662 8044 144. Mykologie und Hygiene, e-mail: helga.stan-lotter!sbg.ac.at Veterina$ rplatz 1, A-1210 Wien, Austria 3 Institut fu$ r Mikrobiologie Several extremely halophilic coccoid archaeal strains were isolated from pieces und Genetik, Universita$ t of dry rock salt that were obtained three days after blasting operations in an Wien, Dr Bohr-Gasse 9, A-1030 Wien, Austria Austrian salt mine. The deposition of the salt is thought to have occurred during the Permian period (225–280 million years ago). On the basis of their polar-lipid composition, 16S rRNA gene sequences, cell shape and growth characteristics, the isolates were assigned to the genus Halococcus. The DNA–DNA reassociation values of one isolate, strain H4T, were 35 and 38% with Halococcus salifodinae and Halococcus saccharolyticus, respectively, and 658–678% with Halococcus morrhuae. The polar lipids of strain H4T were C20–C25 derivatives of phosphatidylglycerol and phosphatidylglycerol phosphate. Whole-cell protein patterns, menaquinone content, enzyme composition, arrangements of cells, usage of carbon and energy sources, and antibiotic susceptibility were sufficiently different between strain H4T and H.
    [Show full text]
  • Properties of Halococcus Salifodinae, an Isolate from Permian Rock Salt Deposits, Compared with Halococci from Surface Waters
    Life 2013, 3, 244-259; doi:10.3390/life3010244 OPEN ACCESS life ISSN 2075-1729 www.mdpi.com/journal/life Article Properties of Halococcus salifodinae, an Isolate from Permian Rock Salt Deposits, Compared with Halococci from Surface Waters Andrea Legat 1, Ewald B. M. Denner 2, Marion Dornmayr-Pfaffenhuemer 1, Peter Pfeiffer 3, Burkhard Knopf 4, Harald Claus 3, Claudia Gruber 1, Helmut König 3 , Gerhard Wanner 5 and Helga Stan-Lotter 1,* 1 Department of Molecular Biology, University of Salzburg, Billrothstr. 11, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; E-Mails: [email protected] (A.L.); [email protected] (M.D.-P.); [email protected] (C.G.) 2 Medical University Vienna, Währingerstrasse 10, 1090 Wien, Austria; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Institute of Microbiology and Wine Research, Johannes Gutenberg-University, 55099 Mainz, Germany; E-Mails: [email protected] (P.P.); [email protected] (H.C.); [email protected] (H.K.) 4 Frauenhofer-Institut für Molekularbiologie und Angewandte Ökologie, 57392 Schmallenberg, Germany; E-Mail: [email protected] 5 LMU Biocenter, Ultrastructural Research, Grosshadernerstrasse 2-4, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +43 699 81223362; Fax: +43 622 8044 7209. Received: 1 January 2013; in revised form: 7 February 2013 / Accepted: 14 February 2013 / Published: 28 February 2013 Abstract: Halococcus salifodinae BIpT DSM 8989T, an extremely halophilic archaeal isolate from an Austrian salt deposit (Bad Ischl), whose origin was dated to the Permian period, was described in 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • And Lipase-Producing Halococcus Agarilyticus GUGFAWS-3 from Marine Haliclona Sp
    Annals of Microbiology (2018) 68:851–861 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-018-1391-6 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Isolation and culturing of protease- and lipase-producing Halococcus agarilyticus GUGFAWS-3 from marine Haliclona sp. inhabiting the rocky intertidal region of Anjuna in Goa, India Sanket Krishnanath Gaonkar1 & Irene Jeronimo Furtado1 Received: 23 March 2018 /Accepted: 24 October 2018 /Published online: 19 November 2018 # Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature and the University of Milan 2018 Abstract Three extremely halophilic bionts GUGFAWS-1, GUGFAWS-2, and GUGFAWS-3 were isolated from a marine, white sponge, attached to rocks, in the intertidal region of Anjuna, Goa, India (15° 34′ 05″ N, 73° 44′ 17° 40′ E). Because the sponge had irregular tubes arranged in clusters, it was identified as Haliclona sp. All sponge bionts produced protease and lipase. GUGFAWS-1 and GUGFAWS-2 were euryhaline Eubacteria, growing from 0 to 30% NaCl concentration. The biont, GUGFAWS-3, was a haloarchaeon having glycerol diether moieties in its cells and showed R-O-R and long isoprenoid chains, in FTIR. The haloarchaeon, GUGFAWS-3, simultaneously produced extracellular 49.5 U mL−1 of protease and 3.67 U mL−1 of lipase, in the presence of 25% NaCl. It grew as dark orange-red colonies at 5–30% NaCl. Its growth was sensitive to bile salts and resistant to 700 U of penicillin. Cells were Gram-negative cocci, arranged in pairs, and 1-μm size in SEM micrograph. It possessed bacterioruberin with absorption at 387, 468, 492, and 523 nm. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of GUGFAWS-3 was 99.1% similar to Halococcus agarilyticus 62E (T) of the family Halococcaceae of the domain Archaea.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Halophilic Archaea from Six Hypersaline Environments in Turkey
    J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. (2007), 17(5), 745–752 Diversity of Halophilic Archaea From Six Hypersaline Environments in Turkey OZCAN, BIRGUL1, GULAY OZCENGIZ2, ARZU COLERI3, AND CUMHUR COKMUS3* 1Mustafa Kemal University, Sciences and Letters Faculty, Department of Biology, 31024, Hatay, Turkey 2METU, Department of Biological Sciences, 06531, Ankara, Turkey 3Ankara University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, 06100, Ankara, Turkey Received: October 17, 2006 Accepted: December 1, 2006 Abstract The diversity of archaeal strains from six environments worldwide. To date, 64 species and 20 hypersaline environments in Turkey was analyzed by comparing genera of Halobacteriaceae have been described [5, 8, 9, their phenotypic characteristics and 16S rDNA sequences. 26, 27], and new taxa in the Halobacteriales are still being Thirty-three isolates were characterized in terms of their described. phenotypic properties including morphological and biochemical Halophilic archaea have been isolated from various characteristics, susceptibility to different antibiotics, and total hypersaline environments such as aquatic environments lipid and plasmid contents, and finally compared by 16S including salt lakes and saltern crystalizer ponds, and saline rDNA gene sequences. The results showed that all isolates soils [9]. Turkey, especially central Anatolia, accommodates belong to the family Halobacteriaceae. Phylogenetic analyses extensive hypersaline environments. To the best of our using approximately 1,388 bp comparisions of 16S rDNA knowledge, there is quite limited information on extremely sequences demonstrated that all isolates clustered closely to halophilic archaea of Turkey origin. Previously, extremely species belonging to 9 genera, namely Halorubrum (8 isolates), halophilic communities of the Salt Lake-Ankara region were Natrinema (5 isolates), Haloarcula (4 isolates), Natronococcus partially characterized by comparing their biochemical and (4 isolates), Natrialba (4 isolates), Haloferax (3 isolates), morphological characteristics [2].
    [Show full text]
  • On the Response of Halophilic Archaea to Space Conditions
    Life 2014, 4, 66-76; doi:10.3390/life4010066 OPEN ACCESS life ISSN 2075-1729 www.mdpi.com/journal/life Review On the Response of Halophilic Archaea to Space Conditions Stefan Leuko 1, Petra Rettberg 1, Ashleigh L. Pontifex 2,3 and Brendan P. Burns 2,3,* 1 Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institut für Luft- und Raumfahrtmedizin, Abteilung Strahlenbiologie, Arbeitsgruppe Astrobiologie, Linder Höhe, Köln 51147, Germany; E-Mails: [email protected] (S.L.); [email protected] (P.R.) 2 School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Australian Centre for Astrobiology, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-2-9385-3659; Fax: +61-2-9385-1591. Received: 24 January 2014; in revised form: 10 February 2014 / Accepted: 17 February 2014 / Published: 21 February 2014 Abstract: Microorganisms are ubiquitous and can be found in almost every habitat and ecological niche on Earth. They thrive and survive in a broad spectrum of environments and adapt to rapidly changing external conditions. It is of great interest to investigate how microbes adapt to different extreme environments and with modern human space travel, we added a new extreme environment: outer space. Within the last 50 years, technology has provided tools for transporting microbial life beyond Earth’s protective shield in order to study in situ responses to selected conditions of space. This review will focus on halophilic archaea, as, due to their ability to survive in extremes, they are often considered a model group of organisms to study responses to the harsh conditions associated with space.
    [Show full text]