Cosmic Strings

Topological defects in cosmology: Cosmic Strings M. Verdult 0423092 Student Seminar Theoretical Physics Abstract This paper will discuss cosmic strings. Two toy models show how cosmic strings are created and a more topological viewpoint is also presented. A scaling solution will be derived and their position as possible source of galaxy formation is discussed. The connections with fundamental string theory and SUSY GUTs are also presented. We end with a discussion of their gravitational effects and possible observations. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Formation of cosmic strings 3 2.1 Global strings . 3 2.2 Local strings . 4 2.3 Cosmic strings from a topological point of view . 5 3 Deriving a scaling solution 6 4 Cosmic strings as source of geometric perturbations 9 5 Connection with fundamental string theory 10 5.1 Fundamental superstring theory . 10 5.2 Cosmic superstrings . 12 5.3 Cosmology of D- and F-strings . 14 6 Genericity of cosmic strings in SUSY GUT 15 7 Gravitational effects of cosmic strings 16 8 Possible observations of cosmic strings 20 8.1 Observation of cosmic string lensing . 20 8.2 Observation of cosmic string loop . 22 8.2.1 Observation of anomalous fluctuations . 22 8.2.2 Explanation by a string loop . 24 8.2.3 Explanation by a binary system . 27 9 Conclusion 29 1 1 Introduction The high point of interest in cosmic strings was in the late eighties and most of the nineties as people thought they might offer an alternative to inflation as a means of generating primordial density perturbations from which clusters and galaxies grew. As I will show GUT-scale strings will give rise to geometric perturbations of the right magnitude. However in the late nineties the cosmic mi- crowave background radiation measurements (COBE, BOOMERanG and later WMAP) contradicted the predictions made by cosmic string theory and made them very improbable as the source of primordial density fluctuations. As I will discuss later on, they might have still contributed a little, but are certainly not the main source. This, of course, caused a drop in interest in the field and the number of papers on cosmic strings dropped from 67 in 1997 to a mere 27 in 2001. This is also shown in figure 1[1]. However the interest in cosmic strings Figure 1: Number of papers with the words cosmic string in the title [1]. then started to rekindle and the number of papers on cosmic strings began to rise again up to 46 in 2003. For this there are four important reasons, two of them are theoretical, the others are observational. The thirst theoretical reason finds its base in fundamental string theory. Origi- nally people thought that there was no connection between cosmic strings and fundamental strings. This was mainly because the energy scales were very dif- ferent, the GUT scale or less for cosmic strings and the Planck scale for fundamental strings. But this no longer holds. It turns out that the string scale may be substantially less and moreover string theory or M-theory predicts, the existence of macroscopic defects of which cosmic strings are an example [2]. The second theoretical reason is that supersymmetric GUTs seem to demand cosmic strings. An important paper on this subject was written in 2004 by Rocher et al. and I will discuss this later. The observational reasons on the other side are not, unfortunately, made by an unambiguous discovery, but there have been tantalizing hints. These lie in 2 two observations, whose most natural explanation seemed to be cosmic strings. The first one constitutes an observation of possible lensing by a straight cosmic string in the system SLC-1 made in 2003 by Sazhin et al. Although closer inspection by the Hubble space telescope in 2006 showed that this was not a case of lensing, this was partly responsible for the revival of interest in cosmic strings and therefore I will also discuss this observation in detail. The second observation is maybe even more tantalizing. This consists of the observation of anomalous fluctuations in the system Q0957+561 made by Schild et al. in 2004. They show that the most obvious explanation for this would be a cosmic string loop but also state that much more work is still needed. In this paper I will only discuss cosmic strings, other topological defects such as domain walls or monopoles I will not discuss. In the first section I will de- scribe how cosmic strings are formed by introducing two toy models. Then I will derive how they evolve in the universe and show that cosmic strings have a scaling solution. Next I will talk about why they were thought to generate primordial density perturbations and which evidence there is against this. Then I will continue with a discussion of the connection between fundamental and cosmic strings and how they appear in supersymmetric GUT and then proceed with a discussion about there gravitational effects mainly focussed on the observations of cosmic strings. Here I will also mention what observational bounds have been derived for cosmic strings. I will finish with a discussion about the possible observations I mentioned above. Lastly it is important to mention that throughout the entire paper I will work in units where c = 1. 2 Formation of cosmic strings To see how cosmic strings are formed I will start with introducing two toy models, the first one leading to global and the second one to local strings and I will end this section with a topological viewpoint on cosmic strings. 2.1 Global strings We start with a complex scalar field φ(x) and with the well known Mexican hat potential given by the formula 1 1 L = @ φ∗@µφ − V (φ);V = λ(jφj2 − η2)2; (1) µ 2 2 where λ and η are constants and L denotes the Lagrangian density. We see that this potential has a global U(1) symmetry under transformations of the form φ ! φeiα. From this potential we can easily derive that the Euler-Lagrange equations become 1 [@2 + λ(jφj2 − η2)]φ = 0: (2) 2 p Solving this equation, we find that a ground state given by φ = (η= 2)eiα0 breaks the U(1) symmetry. Note that this ground state is degenerate. As we 3 2 2 know this will give a mass to the scalar particle equal to ms = λη . Furthermore there is a massless Nambu-Goldstone boson that is associated with the broken symmetry. However equation 2 has also a more interesting solution. This is a static solution with non-zero energy density. To find this solution, called a vortex, we start with a cylindrical symmetrical ansatz for the field φ η in φ = p f(msρ)e ; (3) 2 where ρ, ; z are the usual cylindrical coordinates and n is an integer known as the winding number. The winding number denotes the total number of times the field φ goes around the C1-shaped ground state if we take its values along a closed loop. The winding number is positive for loops clockwise and negative for counterclockwise and we will see strings if it is non-zero. This will become more clear when we discuss their formation from a topological viewpoint later on. The ansatz made in equation 3 is logical to make as we want to see how this Lagrangian allows for the formation of cosmic strings and we know that they have the same symmetry. If we insert this into equation 2 we find that this reduces to a non-linear ordinary differential equation for f 1 n2 1 f 00 + f 0 − f − (f 2 − 1)f = 0; (4) ξ ξ2 2 where I have introduced ξ = msρ for notational convenience. From this equations we can derive the behavior of f for small and large ξ. First we see that continuity of φ requires that f ! 0 as ξ ! 0. We need continuity (and even differentiability) of f because we need the same conditions on φ in order for the Lagrangian density given by equation 1 to be well defined. For large ξ we see that we need f ! 1, so that the field returns to its ground state. This is necessary as it would otherwise contain excess energy and this would mean the total energy blows up. Therefore for large ξ it makes sense to write f = 1 − δf and if we insert this into equation 4 we see that δf ∼ n2/ξ2. We know that the energy density is given by the hamiltonian density and therefore becomes E = jφ_j2 + jrφj2 + V (φ): (5) And here we encounter a problem because, although the energy density is well localized near the origin, we see that it goes as ξ−2 for large ξ as a result of the second term in equation 5. From this we see that the energy per unit length becomes infinite which poses a problem and therefore these solutions, known as global strings or vortices, are usually not considered to be topologically stable. We call these solutions global strings as they come from the breaking of a global symmetry. In the next part we will see what happens when the symmetry is local. 2.2 Local strings In principal the idea for local strings is the same as for global strings, but now we only change the U(1) symmetry from a global to a local symmetry. We know 4 that the Lagrangian density then becomes 1 L = − F F µν + jD φj2 − V (φ); (6) 4 µν µ where Dµ = @µ + ieAµ and Fµν = @µAν − @ν Aµ.

Load more