Arxiv:Hep-Th/0207119V4 8 Oct 2002

Home , Cosmic string

arXiv:hep-th/0207119v4 8 Oct 2002 etbelvl[1,poie h omcsrn tension string cosmic ac- an the satisfies to provided the density [11], network reduce level string will ceptable cosmic strings initial cosmic high the net- very string of cosmic Interactions light the the other producing work. and heating and inflaton modes) to the string goes to open coupling energy expect its we potential (via So tachyon Universe [9,10]. the strings of cosmic all as are produced appear potential, copiously that are its defects those only down inflation the rolls that during shown tachyon was col- or it the As and before away.) other produced inflated each (Defects approach branes scenario, in- lide. the brane this of when In end flation, the interbrane inflationary towards [7,8,9]. an emerge brane robust invariably simply tachyons the very is inflaton looks bulk, the separation, the where in [6], closed scenario live other and graviton modes the while string brane the modes on string live open that are particles model matter. standard tachyonic the where the of part and a uniform, as spatially identified be becomes may density separa- defect defect typical Cos- this the to tion, Averaged compared [4]. large [5]. Sen region produced a by over be out will during defects pointed these produced first mologically, also are rolling, tachyon branes), BPS lower-dimensional latter. the for else. argue somewhere we goes paper, this energy In potential den- after tachyon matter Universe tachyon the pressureless early does sity, of the rolling instead tachyon in or, irrelevant) that inflation, (i.e., either happen implies not This observa- is cosmological big [3]. day it too present tions with magnitude [2], compatible of context matter be orders tachyonic to many cosmological pressureless generically the the is In that density estimate pointed to [1]. as easy Sen pressure, by without density out energy matter tachyon present. as and always potential appears is its down tachyon rolls a tachyon This pair, brane-anti-brane a or rn nain[,0.Tepeec fcsi tig will strings cosmic of presence The [9,10]. inflation brane ntebaewrdraiaino uesrn theory, superstring of realization world brane the In (i.e., solitons stable or defects, theory, superstring In brane non-BPS a with starting theory, superstring In oln aho nBaeWrdCsooyfo uesrn F Superstring from Cosmology World Brane in Tachyon Rolling µ< Gµ ASnmes 12.q 12.d 98.80.Cq 11.27.+d, 11.25.-q, energy numbers: tachyon PACS tach the the of during rest produced the D-branes) c naturall while (via BPS is drained (lower-dimensional Universe, is problem the energy tachyon this heating the to that of all argue almost We if scenario cosmology. in problem h rsueestcyncmte eetyfudi supers in found recently matter tachyonic pressureless The 10 1 eateto hsc n srnm,Uiest fPennsyl of University Astronomy, and Physics of Department − 6 3 hc em ob lasstse in satisfied always be to seems which , 2 etrfrRdohsc n pc eerh onl Univer Cornell Research, Space and Radiophysics for Center aoaoyfrEeetr atcePyis onl Unive Cornell Physics, Particle Elementary for Laboratory ayShiu Gary 1 .H er Tye Henry S.-H. , Nvme 2 2018) 12, (November µ 1 fteeeg-oetmtno o efc udi we if fluid perfect a for identify tensor energy-momentum the of where e eety[5.TennBSbaemdl(ihbrane (with model mat- brane tachyon non-BPS tension study The to [15]. used recently ver- been ter superstring has its which background-independent) particular, [13,14], in sion (or [12], theory boundary field string the by gested aho on speed sound tachyon o ptal needn solutions, independent spatially For F p n otecsi tigpouto.Blw ediscuss we Below, production. mechanisms. two string these cosmic (re-)heating the naturally to to energy rather potential and solved tachyon the be draining can by problem tachyon the density of over-abundance matter density the summarize, spectral To microwave wave [9,10]. cosmic gravitational the the in and background signatures detectable give still 1 a eayfnto tti tg.I e.[1], Ref. In stage. this at function any be can and where 2 / T n r Wasserman Ira and , ( h nrymmnu fE.1 is Eq.(1) of energy-momentum The esalmsl s h aho agaga sug- Langrangian tachyon the use mostly shall We osdragnrlLgaga ftefr ( form the of Lagrangian general a Consider and 2 /ρ X F ) T ( uln oteifltnadmte fields) matter and inflaton the to oupling rn edter a nover-abundance an has theory field tring − ≃ T F F = ρ p X V L T √ T T o oln tteedo inflation. of end the at rolling yon ( ,X ( µν ( = ) x p − X = 2 T = = T ost ewr fcsi strings cosmic of network a to goes stetcynmode, tachyon the is ) τ F 1 = ) = ) = ovdi h rn inflationary brane the in solved y = p − / − V ( is, ) > √ ai,Piaepi,P 19104 PA Philadelphia, vania, 2(1 X V V V ( ∂F/∂X + 1 st,Ihc,N 14853 NY Ithaca, rsity, T √ ( √ ) ( for 0 ( iy taa Y14853 NY Ithaca, sity, Γ( T /D T [ ) T − 2 π ) [2 ) τ X ) X F F ( + Γ(1 p T F ( ˙ e ( X v ( . 1 + 2 ( X F − X T T ecnwieti nteform the in this write can We . ), X 3 ) ˙ ,X T ) ) 2 = ≃ ) 2 / D − T / X 2) > . 2 p ,µ (1 ( 2 ) X T XF − − 1 = X ,ν ) / F T .As 2. ≃ ˙ ,X X − ≡ ,X 2 edTheory ield ) 2Γ(2 T 4 /D g ] g (1 / X µν ,µ ≡ µν 2 Γ( − ,X → F p T = V X T T ,µ X ( T ˙ ( → X ˙ ∂ 0 ) 2 T T 2 ) < µ 2 . ) ,ν )] ) = T for 0 − D h effective The V . for 0 and , 2 , . ( so , ( − X α T X ′ T ) ) ˙ 1) = 2 ∝ w F T → ˙ → T 2 e ( X (3) (2) (4) (1) − 1, = < 1, T ) allowing gravitational clustering. Since wT and vT both Since both the second derivatives of TI (x) and the mixed vanish as T˙ 2 1, tachyon matter is possible cold dark derivatives ∂ T ∂ T with i = j vanish in this ansatz, the → i 1 j 2 matter candidate, but substantial fine-tuning is necessary equations of motion reduce to TI D(XI )=0(I = 1, 2). 2 for tachyon dark matter to be viable [3]. Since D(XI ) only vanishes at XI = uI (this means Next, let us consider the brane-anti-brane pair, which infinitely thin brane), the codimension-2→ ∞ brane tension has a complex tachyon T = T1 +iT2. The tachyon action (F (X) √πX) becomes is [14] → −|T |2/2 2 2 τp−2 =2τp dx1dx2e F (u1)F (u2) p+1 −(T 2+T 2)/2 T = 2τp dx e 1 2 F (X1)F (X2) (5) Z S − =2τ F (u2)F (u2)2π/u u τ (2π)2 (11) Z p 1 2 1 2 → p µν where XI g ∂µTI ∂ν TI . Again, let us consider spa- as expected. This is a vortex solution. tially independent≡ solutions. The energy conservation A non-BPS (p 1)-brane may also be produced (u1 requires thatρ ˙T = 0, where 0,u ), but− it will quickly decay to BPS D(p 2)-→ 2 → ∞ − −|T |2/2 branes. A moving brane with constant velocity v may ρT =2τpe [F1F2 2X1F,X1 F2 2X2F1F,X2 ] (6) − − also be constructed by generalizing T1 to T1(x)= u1(x1 2 − vt), which gives the energy E = τp−2/√1 v , as ex- where FI = F (XI ) and F,XI = F,X (XI ). First, consider − a simple ansatz of linear tachyon profile pected. If we start with a brane-anti-brane pair, the tachyon T1(t)= t ǫ(t) (7) will roll with non-trivial spatial dependence. This will re- − sult in a collection of D(p 2)-branes. However, if we av- − and T2 = 0. One finds that erage over a region much larger than the typical spacing

2 between the D(p 2)-branes, we expect to obtain a spa- ǫ˙(t) e−t /4 0 (8) − ≃ → tially uniform energy density and isotropized pressure, that is, a perfect fluid. In this sense, we may interpret and 1+ X 0, so w = 0 (i.e., zero pressure). Since 1 T the density of defects (which turn out to be cosmic strings X = 0 and→F (X ) = 1, this essentially reduces to the 2 2 [9,10]) as part of the tachyon matter. The Kibble mecha- single T case. In this solution, pressure approaches zero nism would imply an initial density H2M 2 M 6/M 2 from the positive side [15]. s s Pl in cosmic strings at the end of brane∼ inflation.∼ Inter- Suppose we consider a more symmetric ansatz: T (t)= 1 commutation of intersecting cosmic stings and the de- t ǫ1(t), and T2(t) = t ǫ2(t). An examination of the − − 2 cay of string loops (to gravitational radiation) causes the equations of motion yieldsǫ ˙ ǫ˙ e−t /3. However, 1 ∝ 2 ∝ density of the cosmic string network (CSN) to approach when these are substituted into ρT , we find Ω Gµ M 2/M 2 [11], which would be accept- CSN ∼ ∼ s Pl −t2 able. However, the initial density of the network is only τpe 1 1 2 2 ρT 2 + 2 . (9) a fraction Ms /MPl of the total density of the Uni- ≃− 8 ǫ˙1ǫ˙2 ǫ˙1ǫ˙2 ∼4 verse, Ms , at the end of brane inflation. This starting density∼ must be overwhelmingly in the form of radiation A positive constant ρT impliesǫ ˙I < 0 (i.e., 1 + XI < 0), in order for the cosmology to be viable. Thus, we must a solution that cannot be reached starting from small T˙I . Let us estimate the tachyon matter density today as a understand how the mass density in tachyons can convert 2 2 to radiation efficiently at the end of brane inflation. fraction ΩT of the total density 3H0 MPl of our Universe. 4 2 To drain the tachyon energy to heat the Universe, we We assume ρT,initial Ms , where the string scale Ms = ′ 2 2≃ −123 need to couple the tachyon field to other fields, the most 1/α . Using H0 /MPl 10 and ainitial/atoday o ≃ ≃ obvious one being the scalar field φ that describes the 2.7 K/Ms, we find separation between the brane and the anti-brane (φ =0 3 in the above discussion). In brane inflation, φ is the ρT,initial ainitial 28 Ms ΩT = 2 2 10 (10) inflaton. Let us take a simple generalization of the above 3H M atoday ≃ MPl 0 Pl tachyon model to include the inflaton φ, o −31 where 2.7 K/MPl 10 . Since ΩT must be less than 1 1, and M > 1 TeV,≃ we see that the tachyon matter den- (T, φ)= V ( T , φ)F (X )F (X ) gµν φ φ . (12) s L − | | 1 2 − 2 ,µ ,ν sity will be many orders of magnitude too big to be compatible with our Universe [3]. Fortunately, as we shall ar- For brane inflation, the inflaton potential is known to d−2 gue below, this tachyon energy can be completely drained have the form U(φ) U0 U1/φ for large φ, when by cosmic string production and (re-)heating in a realistic there are d extra dimensions≃ − transverse to the brane early Universe. [7,16]. For a particular brane pair, Ui are easily cal- One may also consider a stable solitonic solution of culable [17]. For example, for a brane-anti-brane pair, Eq.(5), with T1(x) = u1x1 and T2(x) = u2x2 [14]. U0 =2τpVp−3 where Vp−3 is the compactification volume

2 2 of the extra (p 3) dimensions of the branes and U1 is ρ˙matter +4Hρmatter =Γφφ˙ . (16) simply twice that− of the gravitational force. When the brane separation φ is comparable to the compactification The total energy density in this situation is size, the compactification effect becomes important and ˙2 2 φ it flattens the potential further [7,9], allowing inflation to ρ = V ( T , φ)(F (X)+2T˙ F,X )+ + ρmatter (17) take place for many e-foldings. | | 2 When the branes are far apart, T is a normal scalar 2 2 and H = 8πGρ/3. Here, we are not interested in the field with positive mass squared mT . As the branes move entire process of brane inflation, just what happens at 2 closer, mT decreases, and becomes negative at the bifur- the end, when the tachyon starts to roll. We assume cation point φv, where T becomes tachyonic. This sug- that there is a prior period of slow rolling (φ decreasing gests the following potential: slowly), during which almost all of the inflation occurs, 1 and density fluctuations are generated [7,8,9]. During the V ( T , φ)= U(φ)exp T 2 λφ2 (13) inflationary period, when T φ is small and (let λ = 1) | | −| | 2 − | | φ > 2−1/2, the evolution of T (t) resembles a massive 2 field, with a mass φ, and we therefore expect T (t) to where the bifurcation point λφv =1/2. ∼ Although the potential U(φ) for small φ remains to remain small, and dominated by quantum fluctuations. be calculated, it is expected to be positive and finite as When the tachyon becomes unstable, it begins with an √ −1 ˙ φ 0. In terms of open strings, U(φ = 0) is a quan- amplitude T HI /2π U0 MPl and T HI T , where ∼ 1/2 ∼ ∼ → HI = (8πGU0/3) is the expansion rate during slow tum one-loop correction, so 2τp is renormalized to 2τpv0, where we shall take 1 > v > 0. So, for φ = 0, we re- roll. We follow the evolution implied by Eq. (15) and 0 −1/2 cover the tachyonic model (5). Notice that the minimum (16) after φ =2 . of the potential V ( T , φ) (φ < φv and T ) is auto- matically zero, independent| | of the details→ of ∞U(φ). As a consequence, the dynamics is insensitive to the particular dT/dt form of U(φ) for φ < φv, since tachyon rolling happens very fast, and V ( T , φ) 0 rapidly. For phenomenol- ogy, we choose a particularly| | → simple form of U(φ), where U(φ) has a simple harmonic form for small φ, a(t)

(1 v0) U(φ)= U0 1 − . (14) 2 2 1 (d−2) " − (φ /φ0 + 1) 2 #

In summary, Eqs.(12,13,14) comprise the model, which dT/dt may be considered as a novel version of hybrid inflation. 2 For fixed φ > φv, T has positive mass mT > 0, so the minimum of the potential is at TI = 0 and classically a(t) ∂µTI = 0, so XI = 0 and F (XI ) = 1. The model reduces to (φ, T =0)= U(φ) gµν ∂ φ∂ φ/2. This describes L − − µ ν the inflationary epoch for φ > φv. Based on the above analysis, let only one of the tachyons roll, say T = T1, while T2 is essentially frozen, with F (X2) = 1. The analysis applies just as well if we replace F (X1)F (X2) in Eq. (12) with the U(1) invari- ant F (X + X ). For a spatially uniform scalar field and 1 2 FIG. 1 Cosmological evolution of φ(t) (red), T˙ tachyon in a FRW expanding Universe, 3 3 (black), ln a(t) (green), ln ρa (blue) and ln ρT a (magenta) for Γφ = 0 (top) and Γφ = 0.1 (bottom). φ¨ + (3H +Γφ)φ˙ = F (X)[V ( T , φ)],φ − | | M = 103, v =0.9, U = 1. V V Pl 0 0 T¨ +3HA(X)T˙ = ,T B(X) ,φ A(X)T˙ φ˙ , (15) − 2V − V As an illustration, numerical results are shown in Fig. where A(X) = F /(F + 2XF ) and B(X) = ,X ,X ,XX 1, assuming (in terms of string scale) 1/M = 10−3, (F 2XF )/(F +2XF ); Γ is a phenomenological Pl ,X ,X ,XX φ U = 1, 1 v = 0.1, d = 4, φ = 1, and Γ = 0 term− that models the decay of φ to ordinary particles and 0 0 0 φ or 0.1. In fact,− because H 0.003, cosmological ex- radiation, whose density is ρ . If the inflaton decays I matter pansion is relatively unimportant.≃ The simulations start primarily to relativistic particles (“radiation”), then with φ(t)=1/√2 and φ˙ = 0, at t 0 and a(t) 1. ≡ ≡

3 The initial data can be varied, but the behavior shown that eventually dissipation becomes relatively unimpor- in Fig. 1 is generic. At first, φ(t) decreases, and T˙ in- tant, and the Universe may be left with a residual tachyon creases. Ultimately, as T˙ 1, T t grows, and the matter density. On the other hand if ΓT increases with product V (T, φ)F (X) decreases→ rapidly≃ for φ2 < 1/2. increasing T , then we might expect T˙ to fall toward zero 3 In the nondissipative case, Γφ = 0, φa˙ constant, and eventually, with T asymptoting to some constant value since a(t) is only changing slowly, φ increases→ or decreases or else growing very slowly. linearly with time. However, since the total energy is con- Let us consider first what happens when ΓT is a de- served, and V (T, φ) would grow exponentially large for creasing function of T . Suppose, as is plausible, that Γφ φ2 > 1/2, the growth of φ cannot continue indefinitely, is characterized by the string scale, so that φ tends to- so φ(t) bounces near φ2| =| 1/2. Associated with these ward a time-independent value as branes approach one bounces are short-lived dips in T˙ , which are evident but another relatively quickly, perhaps even faster than ex- 2 not completely resolved in Fig. 1. Eventually, cosmologi- pansion. For H Ms /MPl, and Γφ = βMs, where β is cal expansion alone would cause φ˙ to decay, and φ would dimensionless, Γ∼/H βM /M , which is greater than φ ∼ Pl s settle to some constant, nonzero value. Dissipation accel- one as long as β > M /M . As φ˙ 0 and T˙ 1, the s Pl → → erates the decay of the nonlinear oscillations. The bottom evolution equation∼ for ρT simplifies to panel in Fig. 1 shows what happens for Γφ =0.1, which 3/2 may be unrealistically large, but illustrates how dissipa- V (T )ΓT (T ) 4ΓT (T )ρT ρ˙T +3HρT , (19) tion suppresses the oscillations, and causes φ to settle to ≃− 2(1 T˙ )3 ≃− V (T ) 3 a nonzero value asymptotically. For either Γφ, ρT a − → 2 p constant 1 eventually, where ρT V (T, φ)D(X). For where we used ρ V (T )/4(1 T˙ ) to obtain the last ∼ ≡ T ≃ − Γφ =0.1, ρT /ρ > 0.9 at the end of the numerical integra- form of the RHS. Eq. (19) has the solution tion; the Universe∼ does not become radiation dominated. −2 Radiation domination can be achieved if the tachyon t ′ ′ 3 dt ΓT (t ) ρT a uφ +2 , (20) couples directly to matter. A possible mechanism might ′ 3/2 ′ ≃ " tφ [a(t )] V (t )# be tachyon preheating [18]. To explore a different pos- Z sibility phenomenologically, suppose we add a dissipa- 3 −1p/2 where uφ is the value of (ρT a ) at roughly the time tive term ΓT T˙ to the second of Eqs. (15), and assume 4 tφ when φ freezes; assuming a density M and scale that the energy− loss due to this term goes directly to ∼ s factor T0/Ms, where T0 is the present temperature of matter. Then the rate of increase of the matter density ∼ 3/2 47.6 3/2 the Universe, uφ (Ms/T0) 10 (Ms/MPl) . due to this form of coupling is 2ΓT XD,X V (T, φ). As- In obtaining Eq. (20),∼ we have approximated∼ T (t) t suming that the inflaton, φ, also couples to matter as in in the integrand. Eq. (18) can be recovered from≃ Eq. the above model, we find that eventually φ φ , with → ∞ (20) by evaluating the integral asymptotically under the φ∞ < 1/√2, while φ˙ 0. The tachyon rolls dissipa- | | → approximation that ΓT is independent of T , and expan- tively toward its minimum at late times, and balancing sion is slow compared to the string timescale. For con- the drag ΓT T˙ with the accleration down the tachyon − stant ΓT , the tachyon matter density falls rapidly with potential, V,T B(X)/2V , implies that time, roughly like exp[ t2(1/2 φ2 )], and becomes ut- − − − ∞ terly negligible. As long as ΓT does not fall faster than ˙ 2ΓT 1 T 2 . (18) V (T ), then the integral in Eq. (20) grows very rapidly. − ≃ t(1 2φ∞) − In general, Eq. (20) implies that for an acceptable ρT to- p Thus, 1+X 2(1 T˙ ) 0 asymptotically, but only as a day ≃ − → 2 power of time, whereas V (T, φ) U(φ∞) exp[ t (1/2 t0 dt′ Γ (t′) 2 ≃ − − T 14 Ms > 10 uφ φ∞)] drops exponentially; the rate of decrease of 1+X is ′ 3/2 ′ ΩT MPL tφ [a(t )] V (t ) ∼ far slower than in Eqs. (7) and (8). After a time of order Z q −1 −1 2 −1/2 M the maximum of ΓT and Γφ , the Universe becomes ra- p 1061.6Ω s , (21) diation dominated, and the tachyon matter density is ex- ∼ T MPl ponentially small. Depending on Γ and Γ , there could T φ if ΓT is a decreasing function of T ; t0 tφ is the present be an early phase of tachyon domination, but it would age of the Universe. Although it is possible≫ for tachyon not last long enough to have any important, lasting ef- matter to become dominant in models with decreasing fects. Although tachyon decay to matter never ceases in ΓT , extreme fine-tuning is required in order for tachyons this model, the radiation production rate becomes expo- to be the cold dark matter. Since 1/ V (t) increases so nentially small at late times, and the additional heating rapidly – like a Gaussian in t – decay of the tachyon field long after the end of inflation is inconsequential. p −1 would have to shut off completely after only 10Ms for It is possible that Γ is a function of T , not constant. ∼ T Eq. (21) to allow substantial ρT today. Otherwise, the Eq. (18) already gives some idea of what might hap- value of ρT today ought to be utterly negligible. Gener- pen. If Γ decreases with increasing T , then we expect T ically, we expect that ΓT cannot shut off effectively and

4 2 2 quickly enough to leave a substantial tachyon matter den- smaller than the horizon scale ζ MPl/Ms , which red- sity today. shifts by a factor of M /ζT ∼to the present day. The ∼ s 0 It is also conceivable that ΓT depends on both T and most stringent limit on the density of short wavelength p T˙ . As T˙ 1, suppose that ΓT = (1 T˙ ) γT (T ). Then gravitational radiation comes from the requirement that instead of→ Eq. (20) we would ﬁnd − the energy density in gravitons is suﬃciently small at

2 the time of nucleosynthesis. Suppose that the end result t ′ ′ − (1−p) 3 1−p 1−p dt (1 p)γT (t ) of reheating is a fraction fg in gravitons, with the rest ρT a uφ +2 − (1−p) . ≃ 3 ′ ′ in ordinary elementary particles (perhaps produced only Ztφ [a (t )V (t )] 2 by the decay of the inflaton). If the effective number of (22) spin degrees of freedom of relativistic particles in equi- For p< 1, Eq. (22) is similar to Eq. (21), and implies a librium after reheating is Srh, and Snuc is the analogous leftover tachyon matter density at late times which may value at nucleosynthesis, then we expect that the frac- or may not be important depending on the details of the tion of the energy density in gravitons at nucleosynthesis is f (S /S )4/3. (S = 43/8 before neutrinos go damping rate. For p > 1, the integrand in Eq. (22) is ≃ g nuc rh nuc proportional to [V (t)](p−1)/2, which falls like a Gaussian, out of equilibrium at T 1 MeV, Snuc = 11/4 between 3 ± ≃ so we expect relatively little decrease in ρT a , for γT < 1. 1 MeV and e annihilation at me, and Snuc = 1 af- ± ∼ The special value p = 1 corresponds to a dissipation∼ rate ter e annihilation.) Assuming that gravitons can only proportional to ρT , and in that case we find comprise at most ǫnuc of the total energy density of the Universe at the nucleosynthesis epoch implies that t 4/3 < 3 3 ′ ′ fg(Snuc/Srh) ǫnuc; for ǫnuc 0.01 0.1, this limit ρT a (ρT a )φ exp 2 dt γT (t ) . (23) ∼ − can be satisfied as∼ long as Srh/Snuc > 10 100, which is ≃ "− tφ # Z not implausibly large. Massive defects∼ that− decay to ele- 3 The final value of ρT a depends sensitively on how mentary particles or gravitons could also be acceptable, quickly γT (T ) decreases with increasing T for p = 1. provided that they decay early enough. Next, let us briefly consider the opposite case, where This model does not account for any small scale inho- ΓT increases with T faster than T . In that case, T˙ even- mogeneities in T (x,t), and so does not describe forma- tually drops toward zero, and T (t) changes only slowly. If tion of cosmic strings. The decay of the tachyon energy the dissipative drag approximately balances acceleration density is not quite as efficient as outlined above because down the tachyon potential then once φ has frozen cosmic strings form via the Kibble mechanism. However, the density of cosmic strings forming in this way is ex- T (1 2φ2 ) Γ T˙ − ∞ , (24) pected to be small, and, at least within the context of the T ≃ 2 ln 4 Γ = 0 model described above, could be far smaller than T 6 Small T˙ requires small T/ΓT . For this regime to extend the density in radiation at the end of brane inflation, and to small ρT V (T ), we would have to require that ΓT /T small enough not to be ruled out by currently available is large even≃ for moderately large values of T . But this cosmological observations. would also imply that ΓT becomes large in units of the To summarize, we have shown that the tachyon mat- string scale, which would not be expected to occur in per- ter density problem can be solved via dissipation and turbation theory; in a nonperturbative calculation, back reheating. Generically, such mechanisms, if active, ought reaction ought to prevent the growth of ΓT to large val- to result in a negligible tachyon matter density today; ex- ues. Thus, if ΓT increases at all, it must only do so for treme fine-tuning is needed for tachyon matter to be the −1 a short time, lasting only Ms . Thereafter, ΓT could cold dark matter. Eq. (21) gives a numerical constraint level off to a constant value∼ or decrease, and the physics that must be satisfied by such a mechanism. Whether or reverts to Eq. (20) (or Eq. [18]). not there are realistic physical scenarios to achieve the Possible products of tachyon decay could include or- required tachyon decay remains to be seen. dinary elementary particles, gravitational radiation and We thank J. Cline, N. Jones, L. Kofman, A. Linde, A. massive defects. Of these, ordinary elementary parti- Naqvi, A. Sen and S. Shatashvili for discussions. This cles would be the most benign, since they would simply research is partially supported by the DOE grant EY- thermalize to reheat the Universe. Since most of the 76-02-3071 (G.S.), UPenn SAS Dean’s fund (G.S.), NSF decrease in tachyon energy density must occur within (S.-H.H.T.), and NASA (I.W.). −1 10Ms of brane collision, the wavelengths of any gravi- ∼tons produced are expected to be small, at most of order ζMPl/MsT0 0.1ζMPl/Ms cm, where ζ 10 or so. ∼This estimate presumes∼ that the Universe becomes∼ radiation dominated – maybe by gravitational radiation pre- 4 dominantly – at a density (Ms/ζ) , and that gravitational radiation produced at∼ this epoch has wavelengths [1] A. Sen, hep-th/0203211; hep-th/0203265; hep-th/0204143.

5 [2] G.W. Gibbons, hep-th/0204008; A. Frolov, L. Kofman and A. Starobinsky, hep-th/0204187; L. Kofman and A. Linde, hep-th/0205121. [3] G. Shiu and I. Wasserman, hep-th/0205003. [4] A. Sen, JHEP 9808 (1998) 012, hep-th/9805170; E. Wit- ten, JHEP 9812 (1998) 019, hep-th/9810188; P. Horava, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1999) 1373, hep-th/9812135. [5] G.W. Gibbons, K. Hori and P. Yi, Nucl. Phys. B596 (2001) 136; M. Majumdar and A.-C. Davis, hep-th/0202148; K. Hashimoto, hep-th/0204203. [6] G. R. Dvali and S.-H.H. Tye, Phys. Lett. B450, (1999) 72, hep-ph/9812483. [7] C.P. Burgess, M. Majumdar, D. Nolte, F. Quevedo, G. Rajesh and R.J. Zhang, JHEP 0107 (2001) 047, hep- th/0105204. [8] J. Garcia-Bellido, R. Rabadan and F. Zamora, JHEP 0201 (2002) 036, hep-th/0112147; C. Herdeiro, S. Hirano and R. Kallosh, JHEP 0112, (2001) 027, hep-th/0110271. B. S. Kyae and Q. Shaﬁ, Phys. Lett. B526 (2002) 379, hep-ph/0111101. [9] N. Jones, H. Stoica and S.-H.H. Tye, hep-th/0203163. [10] S. Sarangi and S.-H.H. Tye, hep-th/0204074. [11] A. Albrecht and N. Turok, Phy. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985) 1868; D.P. Bennett and F.R. Bouchet, ibid, 60 (1988) 257; B. Allen and E.P.S. Shellard, ibid, 64 (1990) 119. [12] E. Witten, Phys. Rev. D46 (1992) 5467, hep-th/9208027; ibid, D47 (1993) 3405, hep-th/9210065; S. Shatashvili, Phys. Lett. B311 (1993) 83, hep-th/9303143. [13] D. Kutasov, M. Marino amd G.W. Moore, hep-th/0010108. [14] P. Kraus and F. Larsen, hep-th/0012198; T. Takayanagi, S. Terashima and T. Uesugi, hep-th/0012210. [15] S. Sugimoto and S. Terashima, hep-th/0205085; J.A. Mi- nahan, hep-th/0205098. [16] G. Dvali, Q. Shaﬁ and S. Solganik, hep-th/0105203. [17] See e.g., J. Polchinski, String Theory, Cambridge Univer- sity Press (1998). [18] G. Felder, J. Garcia-Bellido, P.B. Greene, L. Kofman, A. Linde and I.Tkachev, Phy. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 011601; G. Felder, L. Kofman and A. Linde, hep-th/0106179.