Israel and the Middle East News Update

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Israel and the Middle East News Update Israel and the Middle East News Update Monday, February 23 Headlines: Likud, Zionist Union Spar after Jerusalem Stabbing Attack Palestinians Threaten to End Security Ties with Israel Kerry Says Deal Not Imminent as Iran, US Energy Chiefs Join Talks Netanyahu ‘Astonished’ Over Continuing Nuclear Talks Senior U.S. Official: White House Won't Boycott AIPAC Conference Zionist Union Wins at Bellwether High School's Mock Election Likud: If Bennett Weakens Us, We’ll Form Unity Government with Herzog Comptroller Confirms Pre-Election Publication of Damning Housing Report Commentary: Ma’ariv: “Hara-Kiri” By Ben Caspit The Weekly Standard: “The Israeli Referendum” By Elliott Abrams S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace 633 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20004 www.centerpeace.org ● Yoni Komorov, Editor ● Nathaniel Sobel, Associate Editor News Excerpts February 23, 2015 Times of Israel Likud, Zionist Union Spar After Jerusalem Stabbing Attack The ruling Likud party and the Zionist Union, its main rival in the upcoming national elections, squabbled Sunday hours after a Palestinian teenager stabbed a Jewish man in Jerusalem. The incident was caught on camera and shows Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat and his security team apprehending the attacker. After the attack, the Likud party published a post on Facebook in which it charged that should the Zionist form the next coalition, Hamas would operate in the heart of the Israeli capital since Livni was willing to consider dividing Jerusalem, according to the post. The post was then shared by Prime Minister Netanyahu which prompted an outcry by Zionist Union members who accused him of participating in incitement. Ynet News Palestinians Threaten to End Security Ties with Israel The Palestinian president has threatened to stop security coordination with Israel if the country continues to withhold millions of dollars of Palestinian tax revenue, a senior Palestinian official said Sunday. Nabil Shaath said President Mahmoud Abbas warned European leaders on a trip to Europe last week that Palestinian officials would discuss the matter during a Palestinian central council meeting next week. Israel has withheld tax revenue from the Palestinians since they joined the International Criminal Court last month. Shaath said the withheld revenue amounts to $140 million per month for the last two months. Tax revenue accounts for about 70% of the Palestinians' budget. See also, “Jerusalem hits back at claims it is causing collapse of Palestinian Authority” (Jerusalem Post) Al-Monitor Kerry says deal not imminent as Iran, US energy chiefs join talks The head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran Ali Akbar Salehi and US Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz joined Iran nuclear negotiations in Geneva for the first time Feb. 21, raising expectations that talks had reached a critical point. US Secretary of State John Kerry, however, sought to tamp down expectations that Iran and six world powers were close to finalizing a preliminiary political agreement, telling reporters that there were still significant gaps. The expanded high-level Iranian delegation raised expectations for a possible outcome at the meeting, one month ahead of a March 24 deadline for reaching a political agreement on a final nuclear deal. See also, “Despite 2-hour meet, Kerry and Iran's Zarif fail to find common ground” (Reuters) Times of Israel Netanyahu ‘Astonished’ Over Continuing Nuclear Talks Prime Minister Netanyahu on Sunday criticized the international community for negotiating with Iran while taking no steps to curb its sponsorship of global terrorism, as top American and Iranian diplomats attempted to hammer out a deal in Geneva. Speaking at the cabinet meeting, the prime minister said that it was “astonishing that even after the recent IAEA report determined that Iran is continuing to hide the military components of its nuclear program, the nuclear talks are proceeding.” See also, “Netanyahu slams Herzog for saying Iran not an existential threat” (Jerusalem Post) 2 Ha’aretz U.S. Official: White House Won't Boycott AIPAC Conference Despite the rift between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. President Barack Obama, the U.S. administration has no intention of boycotting the upcoming convention of America's leading pro-Israel lobby, AIPAC, a senior administration official said over the weekend. However, the official refrained from divulging the name or rank of the administration representative who will speak at the conference, though many believe it will be U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew. The official's statements come in the wake of an AP report claiming the Obama administration is mulling ways "to undercut Netanyahu's upcoming trip to Washington and blunt his message that a potential nuclear deal with Iran is bad for Israel and the world." See also, “Ex-envoy to US: White House boycott of AIPAC tantamount to boycott of alliance with Israel” (Jpost) Ynet News Zionist Union Wins at Bellwether High School's Mock Election The high school that predicted the 1977 elections upset and Yitzhak Rabin's victory in 1992, as well as Yair Lapid's big achievement in the 2013 elections, has predicted another upset in the 2015 elections. The students at Blich High School in Ramat Gan took part in a mock election on Sunday, giving the Zionist Union headed by Isaac Herzog and Tzipi Livni 32 percent of the votes. Lapid's party, Yesh Atid, got 28 percent of the votes and ruling party the Likud only got 14 percent, placing it in third place. Over a 1,000 sophomores, juniors and seniors (10th-12th grade) took part in the mock election. Students were wearing T-shirts representing the different parties and several politicians arrived at the school to talk to the students. NRG Likud: If Bennett Weakens Us, We’ll Form Unity Government The internal battle inside the right wing bloc, between the Likud and the Jewish Home, will have ramifications—or so Likud figures have recently threatened. The Likud has only made this threat in closed conversations up until now, although publicly Netanyahu has said that he will not approach Herzog-Livni to form a coalition. However, in closed conversations, Likud figures say that if the Jewish Home weakens Netanyahu’s party, this will force the Likud, against its will, to go to the Zionist Camp on the day after the elections and to propose the establishment of a unity government. See also, “Herzog: I won’t build outside settlement blocs” (Times of Israel) BICOM Comptroller Confirms Publication of Damning Housing Report Israel’s State Comptroller Joseph Shapira confirmed yesterday that there will be no delay in publishing a report on Israel’s housing sector, making it available before next month’s general election. The report is expected to sharply criticize Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s successive administrations on an issue of significant importance to the electorate. Following yesterday’s announcement, Zionist Union leader Isaac Herzog commented that the housing crisis “is not a decree of fate, but rather the result of the ongoing unsuccessful policy of Netanyahu’s failed government.” See also, “Comptroller resists pressure from Likud to release report on housing” (Jerusalem Post) 3 Ma’ariv – February 23, 2015 Hara-Kiri By Ben Caspit “We’ve completely lost our grip,” whispered the whisperer, after getting his interlocutor to swear that he wouldn’t tell anyone. “Don’t quote me, but it seems to me that we’ve gone absolutely and completely mad here. It’s an insane tailspin, real vertigo. At this pace, we’re going to crash into the side of the mountain.” The person who made these remarks, a man who is at the heart of the Likud campaign, spoke (yesterday) about the new record levels of ridiculousness that the Likud campaign has reached or, more correctly, that the Netanyahu family has reached, in the past few days. Let’s start from the beginning. Until not long ago, Netanyahu was running a brilliant campaign. He did so despite the fact that he wasn’t holding particularly good cards in his hand. He dictated the agenda and was able to surprise; he proved that he knew how to be “cool” and displayed a good sense of humor. He floated like a butterfly and stung like a bee. Then came the state comptroller’s report about the Prime Minister’s residences. At that point, when the family started to panic, everything began to run awry. The first mistake was the grotesque public relations video clip with the character who goes by the name of “Moshik Galamin.” It is clear today that that video cast in an even more ridiculous light on the imperial family’s (albeit crumbling) Byzantine Court. The second colossal mistake was to pounce on Meni Naftali. The weekend polls proved that very few people, if any at all, were prepared to buy the unbelievable accusation that was aired by the prime minister (and his wife) of Israel, that their fired custodian is the one who forced them to eat expensive sushi until they burst, to order champagne as if there were no tomorrow, to fill the house with scented candles (at a cost of thousands of shekels), to spend hundreds of thousands of shekels on cleaning their empty home and so on and so forth. By the bye, they turned Meni Naftali into someone who no longer has anything to lose. Blaming Livni for the Terror Attack … Incidentally, yesterday Netanyahu blamed Tzipi Livni for the attempted terror attack in Jerusalem. If that isn’t a case of him losing his grip, I don’t know what is. Why is Livni to blame? Because “a few weeks ago she once again noted her support for dividing Jerusalem.” Ah, now it all makes sense. She said that, and along came a terrorist with a knife in order to prevent the division of the city or something like that.
Recommended publications
  • 2016 Annual Report
    Research. Debate. Impact. 2016 ANNUAL REPORT 1 Table of Contents Message from the President and the Chairman of the Board 4 Sixth Meeting of IDI's International Advisory Council 8 The Center for Democratic Values and Institutions 11 The Center for Religion, Nation and State 23 The Center for Governance and the Economy 29 The Center for Security and Democracy 35 The Guttman Center for Surveys and Public Policy Research 41 IDI in the Media 47 Our Team 50 Our Leaders 51 Our Partners 52 Financials 53 Message from the President and the Chairman of the Board Dear Friends, 2016 was a year of change and upheaval throughout the jobs available to Haredim. The government adopted most of democratic world. Set against the tumult of Brexit and the the recommendations and is now in the process of allocating US elections, Israel seemed at times like an island of stability. a half-billion-shekel budget in line with these proposals. This However, under the surface, Israeli society is changing, and IDI success story illustrates the potential of turning relatively small took on a leading role in identifying those changes and working philanthropic investments into large-scale transformational with policymakers to address them. change by affecting policy and legislation on the basis of outstanding applied research. As the report that follows lays out, 2016 was a year rich in activity and achievements. In this letter, we have chosen to single Several new scholars joined our team in 2016. Ms. Daphna out the impact one program had on government policy in the Aviram-Nitzan, former director of research for the Israel employment area.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel Report Is a Student Publication of Sara, Hefetz Became Her Close Friend
    To provide greater exposure to primary Israeli news sources and opinions in order to become better informed on the issues, and to gain a better understanding of the wide range of perspectives that exist in Israeli society and politics. Issue 1094 • February 23, 2018 • 8 Adar 5778 SECURITY CABINET: NO LONGER STICKING THEIR NECKS OUT FOR Jason Greenblatt, Trump’s envoy for Middle East peace, and Jared Kushner, THE PM (JPost 2/22/18) Trump's son-in-law and adviser, met behind closed doors with the When The Jerusalem Post asked a member of Prime Minister Benjamin ambassadors on Tuesday, the report said. Netanyahu’s security cabinet Wednesday why he does not defend During the one-hour meeting, the envoys did not share details of the Trump Netanyahu in interviews, he responded bluntly and honestly that his plan nor did they indicate when the U.S. administration planned to unveil its conscience limited what he could defend. proposals, diplomats told AFP. "They asked for support at the time the plan In the past, Likud politicians fought over who would go on top television and comes out," said a diplomat, who asked not to be named. Another diplomat radio programs to advocate on the prime minister’s behalf. confirmed that Greenblatt and Kushner had made the request, even though Now, the best Netanyahu got was a strange speech by Culture Minister Miri no details of the plan were shared. Regev in the Knesset in which she made grammatical errors in Hebrew and French Ambassador Francois Delattre said the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • That Is the Only Hope for This Nation!
    04/21/2021 NEWS AM Psalm 91 (On Eagles' Wings) - Taryn Harbridge https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scDRvuAGHGE "There will never be a really free and enlightened State until the State comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, from which all its own power and authority are derived, and treats him accordingly." -- Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862) American author, poet, philosopher, polymath, abolitionist, naturalist, tax resister, development critic, surveyor, historian, and transcendentalist Read the Prophets & PRAY WITHOUT CEASING! That is the only hope for this nation! Please Pray that the world would WAKE UP! Time for a worldwide repentance! Remember ALL US soldiers fighting for our freedom around the world These Pray for those in our government to repent of their wicked corrupt ways. Folks Pray for AB family – Wife just diagnosed with brain tumor In Pray for AS – post knee replacement – some problems and another one scheduled. Prayer- Pray for TR – abnormal Mammogram having double biopsy – Mastectomy Scheduled Check often Pray for ZH - having trouble with PTSD They Pray for LAC – recurrent cancer getting treatment Change! Pray for KL – troubling spiritual situation. Pray for Ella – emotionally disturbed abused child and brother with ? heart problem Pray for JN – Neuro disease Pray for MS – Job issues and change Pray for BB – Severe West Nile Fever –still not mobile- improving! Pray for RBH – cancer recurrence Pray for Felicia – post op problems – continuing Pray for SH and family – lady’s husband passed away and she is in Nursing home. Not doing well. Pray for MP – Very complex problems Pray that The Holy One will lead you in Your preparations for handling the world problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestinian Citizens of Israel: Agenda for Change Hashem Mawlawi
    Palestinian Citizens of Israel: Agenda for Change Hashem Mawlawi Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master‘s degree in Conflict Studies School of Conflict Studies Faculty of Human Sciences Saint Paul University © Hashem Mawlawi, Ottawa, Canada, 2019 PALESTINIAN CITIZENS OF ISRAEL: AGENDA FOR CHANGE ii Abstract The State of Israel was established amid historic trauma experienced by both Jewish and Palestinian Arab people. These traumas included the repeated invasion of Palestine by various empires/countries, and the Jewish experience of anti-Semitism and the Holocaust. This culminated in the 1948 creation of the State of Israel. The newfound State has experienced turmoil since its inception as both identities clashed. The majority-minority power imbalance resulted in inequalities and discrimination against the Palestinian Citizens of Israel (PCI). Discussion of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict tends to assume that the issues of the PCIs are the same as the issues of the Palestinians in the Occupied Territories. I believe that the needs of the PCIs are different. Therefore, I have conducted a qualitative case study into possible ways the relationship between the PCIs and the State of Israel shall be improved. To this end, I provide a brief review of the history of the conflict. I explore themes of inequalities and models for change. I analyze the implications of the theories for PCIs and Israelis in the political, social, and economic dimensions. From all these dimensions, I identify opportunities for change. In proposing an ―Agenda for Change,‖ it is my sincere hope that addressing the context of the Israeli-Palestinian relationship may lead to a change in attitude and behaviour that will avoid perpetuating the conflict and its human costs on both sides.
    [Show full text]
  • Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 09/14 Aktuelles Aus Israelischen Tageszeitungen
    Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 09/14 Aktuelles aus israelischen Tageszeitungen 29. April – 10. Mai 2014 1. Doppelte Kritik an price tag Attacken Zuhair Bahloul, JED 01.05.14 In den vergangenen zwei Wochen sind vermehrt Is Israel facing a war between religions? öffentliche Gebäude und Privatgeschäfte in “The Arab public − particularly the youth − israelisch-arabischen sowie palästinensischen suspiciously wonders on social media why law Ortschaften mit Graffiti beschmiert worden. Die enforcement’s resourcefulness and speed disappear sogenannten "price tag" Attacken werden von when it comes to Jewish terror. [...] It seems the israelischen Siedlern und extrem rechten Aktivisten Jewish public is unaware of the dangers of a ausgeführt, um Druck auf die Regierung auszuüben, negligent law enforcement authority. The ongoing keine weiteren Zugeständnisse im Westjordanland Palestinian frustration in light of the waves of racism zu machen. and indifference among law enforcement could bring Der anti-arabische Vandalismus inkludierte das about religious war. A few of the thousand or so Aufstechen von Autoreifen, das Einwerfen von people who demonstrated recently at Umm al-Fahm Fensterscheiben und das Sprühen von "Tod den Junction held signs that read, ‘The Israeli Arabern" auf ein drusisches Schaufenster. Eine government is abandoning us, we will defend our weitere Eskalation war der Vandalismus in der holy sites ourselves.’ A law-abiding Muslim or israelisch-arabischen Kleinstadt Fureidis am 29. Christian who sees Israeli law enforcement does April, bei dem Graffitis auf eine Moschee gesprüht nothing to bring justice to lawbreakers could decide wurden. Die Stadt liegt im Norden Israels und gilt als the best way to prevent harassment is to adopt nicht radikal.
    [Show full text]
  • Excluded, for God's Sake: Gender Segregation and the Exclusion of Women in Public Space in Israel
    Excluded, For God’s Sake: Gender Segregation and the Exclusion of Women in Public Space in Israel המרכז הרפורמי לדת ומדינה -לוגו ללא מספר. Third Annual Report – December 2013 Israel Religious Action Center Israel Movement for Reform and Progressive Judaism Excluded, For God’s Sake: Gender Segregation and the Exclusion of Women in Public Space in Israel Third Annual Report – December 2013 Written by: Attorney Ruth Carmi, Attorney Ricky Shapira-Rosenberg Consultation: Attorney Einat Hurwitz, Attorney Orly Erez-Lahovsky English translation: Shaul Vardi Cover photo: Tomer Appelbaum, Haaretz, September 29, 2010 – © Haaretz Newspaper Ltd. © 2014 Israel Religious Action Center, Israel Movement for Reform and Progressive Judaism Israel Religious Action Center 13 King David St., P.O.B. 31936, Jerusalem 91319 Telephone: 02-6203323 | Fax: 03-6256260 www.irac.org | [email protected] Acknowledgement In loving memory of Dick England z"l, Sherry Levy-Reiner z"l, and Carole Chaiken z"l. May their memories be blessed. With special thanks to Loni Rush for her contribution to this report IRAC's work against gender segregation and the exclusion of women is made possible by the support of the following people and organizations: Kathryn Ames Foundation Claudia Bach Philip and Muriel Berman Foundation Bildstein Memorial Fund Jacob and Hilda Blaustein Foundation Inc. Donald and Carole Chaiken Foundation Isabel Dunst Naomi and Nehemiah Cohen Foundation Eugene J. Eder Charitable Foundation John and Noeleen Cohen Richard and Lois England Family Jay and Shoshana Dweck Foundation Foundation Lewis Eigen and Ramona Arnett Edith Everett Finchley Reform Synagogue, London Jim and Sue Klau Gold Family Foundation FJC- A Foundation of Philanthropic Funds Vicki and John Goldwyn Mark and Peachy Levy Robert Goodman & Jayne Lipman Joseph and Harvey Meyerhoff Family Richard and Lois Gunther Family Foundation Charitable Funds Richard and Barbara Harrison Yocheved Mintz (Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bennett-Lapid ‘Change Government’
    BICOM Briefing The Bennett-Lapid ‘Change Government’ June 2021 The Bennett-Lapid ‘Change Government’ On Wednesday evening, 2 June, Yesh Atid leader Yair Lapid informed President Rivlin that he had succeeded in forming a coalition government, adding that it would “work for all the citizens of Israel, those that voted for it and those that didn’t. It will do everything to unite Israeli society”. Swearing the new government into office, which only requires only a relative majority, will take place within the next 11 days. Yamina’s Naftali Bennett will serve as Prime Minister for the first two years, followed by Lapid. Maariv 1 June, Bennett and Lapid stare lovingly at eachother as the sun – with the face of Netan- yahu sets The Change Government How did we get here? The elections for the 24th Knesset which took place on 23 March 2021 gave neither the pro-Netanyahu bloc nor the anti-Netanyahu bloc a clear majority of 61 seats. Following the results, two parties who defined themselves as unaligned were considered to be key to both sides - Naftali Bennett of Yamina (7 seats) and Mansour Abbas of Raam (4 seats). Bennett emphasised his preference for a right-wing and ultra- Orthodox coalition. When Likud sources sent out feelers to Raam to support the government from outside 2 the coalition, that move was opposed by Bezalel Smotrich and his Religious Zionist party. With Saar unwilling to sit with Netanyahu, and Smotrich unwilling to countenance outside support from Raam, the pro-Netanyahu right-wing/ultra-Orthodox coalition could only muster 59 seats.
    [Show full text]
  • De Facto and De Jure Annexation: a Relevant Distinction in International Law? Israel and Area C: a Case Study
    FREE UNIVERSITY OF BRUSSELS European Master’s Degree in Human Rights and Democratisation A.Y. 2018/2019 De facto and de jure annexation: a relevant distinction in International Law? Israel and Area C: a case study Author: Eugenia de Lacalle Supervisor: François Dubuisson ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, our warmest thanks go to our thesis supervisor, François Dubuisson. A big part of this piece of work is the fruit of his advice and vast knowledge on both the conflict and International Law, and we certainly would not have been able to carry it out without his help. It has been an amazing experience to work with him, and we have learned more through having conversations with him than by spending hours doing research. We would like to deeply thank as well all those experts and professors that received an e-mail from a stranger and accepted to share their time, knowledge and opinions on such a controversial topic. They have provided a big part of the foundation of this research, all the while contributing to shape our perspectives and deepen our insight of the conflict. A list of these outstanding professionals can be found in Annex 1. Finally, we would also like to thank the Spanish NGO “Youth, Wake-Up!” for opening our eyes to the Israeli-Palestinian reality and sparkling our passion on the subject. At a more technical level, the necessary field research for this dissertation would have not been possible without its provision of accommodation during the whole month of June 2019. 1 ABSTRACT Since the occupation of the Arab territories in 1967, Israel has been carrying out policies of de facto annexation, notably through the establishment of settlements and the construction of the Separation Wall.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Nonprofits: an Exploration of Challenges and Opportunities , Master’S Thesis, Regis University: 2005)
    Israeli NGOs and American Jewish Donors: The Structures and Dynamics of Power Sharing in a New Philanthropic Era Volume I of II A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Department of Near Eastern and Judaic Studies S. Ilan Troen, Advisor In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Eric J. Fleisch May 2014 The signed version of this form is on file in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences. This dissertation, directed and approved by Eric J. Fleisch’s Committee, has been accepted and approved by the Faculty of Brandeis University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Malcolm Watson, Dean Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Dissertation Committee: S. Ilan Troen, Department of Near Eastern and Judaic Studies Jonathan D. Sarna, Department of Near Eastern and Judaic Studies Theodore Sasson, Department of International Studies, Middlebury College Copyright by Eric J. Fleisch 2014 Acknowledgements There are so many people I would like to thank for the valuable help and support they provided me during the process of writing my dissertation. I must first start with my incomparable wife, Rebecca, to whom I dedicate my dissertation. Rebecca, you have my deepest appreciation for your unending self-sacrifice and support at every turn in the process, your belief in me, your readiness to challenge me intellectually and otherwise, your flair for bringing unique perspectives to the table, and of course for your friendship and love. I would never have been able to do this without you.
    [Show full text]
  • February 17 2020 Netanyahu’S Economic Plan: Who Will Believe the Spin?
    Israel and the Middle East News Update Monday, February 17 Headlines: • U.S. Ambassador to Israel to Lead Joint Committee on Annexation • Palestinian PM: Trump's Mideast Plan 'Will be Buried' • Security Ties with Israel Won't Last Forever, Abbas Spokesperson Says • Hospitals and Cheap Houses: Netanyahu, Barkat Unveil Financial Plan • Right-Wing Religious Parties Renew Pledge to Back Netanyahu as PM • Mandelblit, Ashkenazi Recordings from Harpaz Affair Aired for First Time • Lapid: If Democrat wins, Netanyahu-Led Israel in ‘Deep Trouble’ • J Street Calls for Democratic Group to Take Down Sanders Aattack Ad Commentary: • Ha’aretz: “Whether Gantz Wins or Loses, It Will Be on Netanyahu’s Terms” - By Anshel Pfeffer, commentator at Ha’aretz • Ma’ariv: “Netanyahu’s Economic Plan: Who Will Believe the Spin?” - By Yehuda Sharoni, commentator at Ma’ariv S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace 633 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20004 www.centerpeace.org ● Yoni Komorov, Editor News Excerpts February 17, 2020 Ha’aretz U.S. Ambassador to Israel to Lead Joint Committee on Annexation The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump confirmed on Saturday that its ambassador to Israel, David Friedman, will lead the joint Israeli-U.S. committee that will discuss the Israeli annexation of West Bank settlements. The committee was announced by Trump last month during the unveiling of his Middle East peace plan, which would see Israel applying sovereignty to swathes of the West Bank in exchange for parts of Israel's south and a cluster of Arab-majority towns in the north. The participants' goal, as Trump said, is to "convert the conceptual map" shown in the plan into a "more detailed and calibrated rendering so that recognition can be immediately achieved.” See also, “US-Israeli mapping committee for Trump peace plan said finalized” (TOI) Ynet News Palestinian PM: Trump's Mideast Plan 'Will be Buried' The Palestinian prime minister lashed out Sunday at U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerusalem Web Review
    CONFLICT IN CITIES AND THE CONTESTED STATE Everyday life and the possibilities for transformation in Belfast, Jerusalem and other divided cities www.conflictincities.org JERUSALEM WEB REVIEW July-August Feb 2009 1 Jerusalem Web Review July - August 2009 Overview of articles: 1. An Interview with Nir Barkat on Jerusalem 2. Jerusalem families waiting for US action / Sheikh Jarrah evictions 3. Neglect of wastewater treatment in Jerusalem and the West Bank 4. Peace Now: Halt illegal construction north of Jerusalem 5. Jerusalem, US debate: Is Ariel a settlement bloc? 6. Haredim bring segregation to Jerusalem streets 7. Ir Amim, Sheikh Jarrah Report 8. ICAHD: House Demolitions Statistics (1967-2009) 9. The Sheikh Jarrah-Shimon HaTzadik Neighborhood (JCPA paper) 10. Resistance Marches in East Jerusalem 11. OCHA's latest report on the Barrier "Five Years after the International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion: A Summary of the Humanitarian Impact of the Barrier" (July 2009) 12. A Settlement Freeze . Or More of the Same 13. City Front: East J'lem's main drag gets an upgrade 14. Jerusalem riots expose tension between ultra-orthodox Jews and the State 15. Envoy: US favors overall Mideast peace accord 16. Right-wing activists sabotage J'lem master plan 17. Israel uses Hitler picture to sell its settlement expansion 18. PM delays discussion on Temple Mount project/Mughrabi Gate 19. Jerusalem riots / Losing control 2 1. An Interview with Nir Barkat, By Annie Lowrey, Foreign Policy, 14/08/2009 http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/08/14/interview_with_nir_barkat?page=f ull He's in charge of the most contested 44 square miles on the planet.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic and Non-Policy Voting: a Coalitional Analysis of Israeli
    Strategic and Non-policy Voting: A Coalitional Analysis of Israeli Electoral Reform Ethan Bueno de Mesquita Department of Government Harvard University Forthcoming in Comparative Politics, October 2000. Strategic and Non-policy Voting: A Coalitional Analysis of Israeli Electoral Reform Abstract I examine why a majority of Israel’s legislators voted for direct election of the prime minister, reforming the electoral system that vested them with power. The analysis incorporates coalitional politics, strategic voting, and voter preferences over non-policy issues such as candidate charisma. The model generates novel hypotheses that are tested against empirical evidence. It explains five empirical puzzles that are not fully addressed by extant explanations: why Labour supported the reform, why Likud opposed it, why small left-wing parties supported the reform, small right-wing parties were split, and religious parties opposed it, why the Likud leadership, which opposed reform, lifted party discipline in the final reading of the bill, and why electoral reform passed at the particular time that it did. Strategic and Non-policy Voting: A Coalitional Analysis of Israeli Electoral Reform On March 18, 1992, Israel’s twelfth Knesset legislated the direct election of the Prime Minister, fundamentally altering Israel’s electoral system. Such large-scale electoral reform is rare in democracies.1 This is because electoral reform requires that those who have been vested with power by a particular system vote for a new system whose consequences are uncertain. Efforts to explain the political causes of Israeli electoral reform leave critical questions unanswered. A theory of electoral reform must explain both the interests of the political actors involved as well as why reform occurred at a particular time; it must specify the changes in the actors’ interests or in the political system that led to reform.
    [Show full text]