Eunis Habitat Classification Revised 2004

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eunis Habitat Classification Revised 2004 EUNIS HABITAT CLASSIFICATION REVISED 2004 Cynthia E Davies1 Dorian Moss2 Mark O Hill3 1Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Winfrith Technology Centre, Winfrith Newburgh, Dorchester, Dorset DT2 8ZD, UK 2 Dorian Ecological Information Ltd., 21 Stapleford Road, Whissendine, Oakham, Rutland LE15 7HF, UK 3Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Monks Wood, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon PE28 2LS, UK Report to: EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT AGENCY EUROPEAN TOPIC CENTRE ON NATURE PROTECTION AND BIODIVERSITY Date: October 2004 EUNIS Habitat Classification Revised 2004 by Cynthia E Davies, Dorian Moss and Mark O Hill Abstract The habitat classification forms an integral part of the European Nature Information System (EUNIS), developed and managed by the European Topic Centre for Nature Protection and Biodiversity (ETC/NPB in Paris) for the European Environment Agency (EEA) and the European Environmental Information Observation Network (EIONET). The EUNIS habitat system consists of a database together with explanatory documentation. EUNIS habitats are arranged in a hierarchy, starting at level 1. They provide a comprehensive typology for the habitats of Europe and its adjoining seas. This report provides full documentation of EUNIS habitats to level 4 for marine habitats and to level 3 for terrestrial and freshwater habitats. Marine habitats, their descriptions, and the criteria for deriving them, were extensively revised following an expert workshop in Helsinki in July 2004. Terrestrial and freshwater habitats were critically reviewed by us in 2004. Many new definitions were added and most of the existing definitions were revised. A few names were changed. The results of these changes are presented as a set of factsheets for habitats at levels 1 to 4 (marine) and levels 1 to 3 (terrestrial and freshwater), accompanied by a key and a glossary. In an annex, the names and index numbers of all EUNIS habitats are listed, including the higher levels. ii CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................1 1.1 Habitats in the context of the European Nature Information System (EUNIS) ..............1 1.2 Definition and scale of EUNIS habitats ..........................................................................2 1.3 The EUNIS habitat type classification: Description of level 1 habitats..........................3 1.4 EUNIS habitat classification: Description of marine level 2 habitats.............................4 1.5 Development of the classification ...................................................................................5 1.6 Development of the marine part of the classification......................................................6 2 KEY TO THE CLASSIFICATION TO LEVEL 2 ........................................................8 A Criteria for marine habitats...................................................................................................................13 B Criteria for coastal habitats...................................................................................................................28 C Criteria for inland surface waters........................................................................................................33 D Criteria for mires, bogs and fens.........................................................................................................40 E Criteria for grasslands and lands dominated by forbs, mosses or lichens ...............................48 F Criteria for heathland, scrub and tundra ............................................................................................59 G Criteria for woodland, forest and other wooded land ...................................................................72 H Criteria for inland unvegetated or sparsely vegetated habitats...................................................83 I Criteria for regularly or recently cultivated agricultural, horticultural and domestic habitats.......................................................................................................................................................90 J Criteria for constructed, industrial and other artificial habitats (J) to Level 2 ........................93 3 HABITAT DEFINITIONS AND FACTSHEETS......................................................100 A Marine habitats ................................................................................................................101 B Coastal habitats...............................................................................................................181 C Inland surface waters.......................................................................................................189 D Mires, bogs and fens........................................................................................................198 E Grasslands and lands dominated by forbs, mosses or lichens.........................................206 F Heathland, scrub and tundra............................................................................................221 G Woodland, forest and other wooded land........................................................................236 H Inland unvegetated or sparsely vegetated habitats ..........................................................253 I Regularly or recently cultivated agricultural, horticultural and domestic habitats .........267 J Constructed, industrial and other artificial habitats ........................................................270 4 GLOSSARY...................................................................................................................279 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..........................................................................................297 6 REFERENCES..............................................................................................................306 ANNEX 1 Index numbers and names of all EUNIS Habitats 2004 (in a separate document) iii 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Habitats in the context of the European Nature Information System (EUNIS) Since the inception of the European Environment Agency there has been a continuous work programme to develop a comprehensive framework for classification of European habitats and to provide descriptions of European habitat types within the framework. The framework includes habitat attributes, which in this context are called ‘parameters’, of which defining parameters are used to distinguish between habitats and descriptive parameters are used to describe the range of geomorphology, salinity, human impacts and so forth that are encompassed within the habitat. The habitat classification forms an integral part of the European Nature Information System (EUNIS), developed and managed by the European Topic Centre for Nature Protection and Biodiversity (ETC/NPB in Paris) for the European Environment Agency (EEA) and the European Environmental Information Observation Network (EIONET). The EUNIS web application (http://eunis.eea.eu.int/index.jsp) (EEA 2004) provides access to publicly available data in a consolidated database. The information includes: • Data on Species, Habitats and Sites compiled in the framework of NATURA2000 (EU Habitats and Birds Directives), • Data collected from frameworks such as EIONET, data sources or material published by ETC/NPB (formerly the European Topic Centre for Nature Conservation). • Information on Species, Habitats and Sites taken into account in relevant international conventions or from International Red Lists. • Specific data collected in the framework of the EEA's reporting activities, which also constitute a core set of data to be updated periodically. This report presents the EUNIS habitat classification and key updated in October 2004. 1.2 Definition and scale of EUNIS habitats For the purposes of EUNIS, a ‘habitat’ is defined as: ‘a place where plants or animals normally live, characterized primarily by its physical features (topography, plant or animal physiognomy, soil characteristics, climate, water quality etc.) and secondarily by the species of plants and animals that live there’. Habitats are necessarily defined at a given scale. Some EUNIS habitats such as moss and lichen tundra or deep-sea mud may be of vast extent. Others such as cave entrances or springs, spring brooks and geysers are much smaller. Most but not all EUNIS habitats are in effect ‘biotopes’, that is to say ‘areas with particular environmental conditions that are sufficiently uniform to support a characteristic assemblage of organisms’. A few EUNIS habitats such as glaciers and highly artificial non-saline standing waters may be devoid of living organisms other than microbes. These features, although not strictly habitats, are included for completeness. The EUNIS habitat classification is comprehensive. It covers the whole of the European land and sea area, i.e. the European mainland as far east as the Ural Mountains, including offshore islands (Cyprus; Iceland but not Greenland), and the archipelagos of the European Union 1 Member States (Canary Islands, Madeira and the Azores), Anatolian Turkey and the Caucasus. In general, the scale selected for the EUNIS habitat classification is that occupied by small vertebrates, large invertebrates, and vascular plants. It is the same as that generally adopted by other European-scale typologies, for example by the Palaearctic habitat classification (Devillers & Devillers-Terschuren, 1996) and is comparable to the scale applied to the classification of vegetation in traditional
Recommended publications
  • Methods and Work Profile
    REVIEW OF THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS OF PHYTOPHTHORA AND THE LIKELY IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES JANUARY 2011 Simon Conyers Kate Somerwill Carmel Ramwell John Hughes Ruth Laybourn Naomi Jones Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Review of the potential impacts on species of higher trophic groups .................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 44 3. Review of the potential impacts on ecosystem services .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Checklist of the Genus Eugnorisma Boursin, 1946 of Iran with New Records and Distributional Data (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae
    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Rabieh, M. M.; Seraj, A. A.; Gyulai, P.; Esfandiari, M. Checklist of the genus Eugnorisma Boursin, 1946 of Iran with new records and distributional data (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae, Noctuinae) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 41, núm. 163, septiembre, 2013, pp. 399-413 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45529269018 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative 399-413 Checklist of the Eugno 4/9/13 12:16 Página 399 SHILAP Revta. lepid., 41 (163), septiembre 2013: 399-413 eISSN: 2340-4078 ISSN: 0300-5267 Checklist of the genus Eugnorisma Boursin, 1946 of Iran with new records and distributional data (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae, Noctuinae) M. M. Rabieh, A. A. Seraj, P. Gyulai & M. Esfandiari Abstract A checklist of 9 species and 4 subspecies of the genus Eugnorisma Boursin, 1946, in Iran, with remarks, is presented based on the literature and our research results. Furthermore 1 species and 4 subspecies are discussed, as formerly erroneously published taxons from Iran, because of misidentification or mislabeling. Two further subspecies, E. insignata leuconeura (Hampson, 1918) and E. insignata pallescens Christoph, 1893, formerly treated as valid taxons, are downgraded to mere form, both of them occurring in Iran. New data on the distribution of some species of this genus in Iran are also given.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) 321-356 ©Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria; Download Unter
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Entomofauna Jahr/Year: 2007 Band/Volume: 0028 Autor(en)/Author(s): Yefremova Zoya A., Ebrahimi Ebrahim, Yegorenkova Ekaterina Artikel/Article: The Subfamilies Eulophinae, Entedoninae and Tetrastichinae in Iran, with description of new species (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) 321-356 ©Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Entomofauna ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR ENTOMOLOGIE Band 28, Heft 25: 321-356 ISSN 0250-4413 Ansfelden, 30. November 2007 The Subfamilies Eulophinae, Entedoninae and Tetrastichinae in Iran, with description of new species (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) Zoya YEFREMOVA, Ebrahim EBRAHIMI & Ekaterina YEGORENKOVA Abstract This paper reflects the current degree of research of Eulophidae and their hosts in Iran. A list of the species from Iran belonging to the subfamilies Eulophinae, Entedoninae and Tetrastichinae is presented. In the present work 47 species from 22 genera are recorded from Iran. Two species (Cirrospilus scapus sp. nov. and Aprostocetus persicus sp. nov.) are described as new. A list of 45 host-parasitoid associations in Iran and keys to Iranian species of three genera (Cirrospilus, Diglyphus and Aprostocetus) are included. Zusammenfassung Dieser Artikel zeigt den derzeitigen Untersuchungsstand an eulophiden Wespen und ihrer Wirte im Iran. Eine Liste der für den Iran festgestellten Arten der Unterfamilien Eu- lophinae, Entedoninae und Tetrastichinae wird präsentiert. Mit vorliegender Arbeit werden 47 Arten in 22 Gattungen aus dem Iran nachgewiesen. Zwei neue Arten (Cirrospilus sca- pus sp. nov. und Aprostocetus persicus sp. nov.) werden beschrieben. Eine Liste von 45 Wirts- und Parasitoid-Beziehungen im Iran und ein Schlüssel für 3 Gattungen (Cirro- spilus, Diglyphus und Aprostocetus) sind in der Arbeit enthalten.
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae: Linyphiidae)
    © Entomologica Fennica. 31 May 2011 The distribution and habitat preferences of an extremely rare European spider, Glyphesis taoplesius (Araneae: Linyphiidae) Maria Oleszczuk, Izabela Hajdamowicz & Marzena Stañska Oleszczuk, M., Hajdamowicz, I. & Stañska, M. 2011: The distribution and habi- tat preferences of an extremely rare European spider, Glyphesis taoplesius (Ara- neae: Linyphiidae). Entomol. Fennica 22: 1520. Glyphesis taoplesius Wunderlich, 1969 is a very rare spider species that has only been found in a few locations in Europe. Two specimens of G. taoplesius were re- cently collected in the Bug river valley in eastern Poland. It is the first record of this species in Poland. A morphological description of the male and a distribution map of the species are given in the paper. G. taoplesius is a hygrophilous spider typically found near bodies of water and the Polish specimens were found in a pe- riodically flooded meadow. M. Oleszczuk, Institute for Agricultural and Forest Environment, Polish Acad- emy of Sciences, Field Station, Szkolna 4, Turew, 64-000 Kocian, Poland; E- mail: [email protected] I. Hajdamowicz & M. Stañska, Department of Zoology, University of Podlasie, B. Prusa 12, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland; E-mails: [email protected] & [email protected] Received 12 February 2010, accepted 1 June 2010 1. Introduction 2004, Staudt 2010). Nevertheless, in Germany and Slovakia it still belongs to the group of en- Four spider species of the genus Glyphesis Si- dangered species (Gajdo et al. 1999, Platen et al. mon, 1926; have been found in Europe: G. tao- 1996, 1998), and in Czech Republic and Poland is plesius Wunderlich, 1969; G.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Ribeiro Fishing for a Feeding Frenzy
    UNIVERSITY OF GHENT- FACULTY OF SCIENCES RESEARCH GROUP MARINE BIOLOGY ACADEMIC YEAR 2015-2016 FISHING FOR A FEEDING FRENZY Effect of Shrimp Beam Trawling on the diet of Dab and Plaice in Lanice conchilega habitats Submitted by MARIA INÊS COELHO MEIRELES RIBEIRO PROMOTER: Prof. Dr. Ann Vanreusel SUPERVISORS: Jochen Depestele and Jozefien Derweduwen Master thesis submitted for the partial fulfilment of the title of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MARINE BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION Within the International Master of Science in Marine Biodiversity and Conservation EMBC+ No data can be taken out of this work without prior approval of the thesis promoter Prof. Dr. Ann Vanreusel ([email protected]) and supervisors Jochen Depestele ([email protected]) and Jozefien Derweduwen ([email protected]) TABLE OF CONTENS LIST OF FIGURES............................................................................................................................. 3 LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................................. 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................5 ABSTRACT....................................................................................................................................... 6 1. INTRODUCTION …..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • I. Türkiye Derin Deniz Ekosistemi Çaliştayi Bildiriler Kitabi 19 Haziran 2017
    I. TÜRKİYE DERİN DENİZ EKOSİSTEMİ ÇALIŞTAYI BİLDİRİLER KİTABI 19 HAZİRAN 2017 İstanbul Üniversitesi, Su Bilimleri Fakültesi, Gökçeada Deniz Araştırmaları Birimi, Çanakkale, Gökçeada EDİTÖRLER ONUR GÖNÜLAL BAYRAM ÖZTÜRK NURİ BAŞUSTA Bu kitabın bütün hakları Türk Deniz Araştırmaları Vakfı’na aittir. İzinsiz basılamaz, çoğaltılamaz. Kitapta bulunan makalelerin bilimsel sorumluluğu yazarlarına aittir. All rights are reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission from the Turkish Marine Research Foundation. Copyright © Türk Deniz Araştırmaları Vakfı ISBN-978-975-8825-37-0 Kapak fotoğrafları: Mustafa YÜCEL, Bülent TOPALOĞLU, Onur GÖNÜLAL Kaynak Gösterme: GÖNÜLAL O., ÖZTÜRK B., BAŞUSTA N., (Ed.) 2017. I. Türkiye Derin Deniz Ekosistemi Çalıştayı Bildiriler Kitabı, Türk Deniz Araştırmaları Vakfı, İstanbul, Türkiye, TÜDAV Yayın no: 45 Türk Deniz Araştırmaları Vakfı (TÜDAV) P. K: 10, Beykoz / İstanbul, TÜRKİYE Tel: 0 216 424 07 72, Belgegeçer: 0 216 424 07 71 Eposta: [email protected] www.tudav.org ÖNSÖZ Dünya denizlerinde 200 metre derinlikten sonra başlayan bölgeler ‘Derin Deniz’ veya ‘Deep Sea’ olarak bilinir. Son 50 yılda sualtı teknolojisindeki gelişmelere bağlı olarak birçok ulus bu bilinmeyen deniz ortamlarını keşfetmek için yarışırken yeni cihazlar denemekte ayrıca yeni türler keşfetmektedirler. Özellikle Amerika, İngiltere, Kanada, Japonya başta olmak üzere birçok ülke derin denizlerin keşfi yanında derin deniz madenciliğine de ilgi göstermektedirler. Daha şimdiden Yeni Gine izin ve ruhsatlandırma işlemlerine başladı bile. Bütün bunlar olurken ülkemizde bu konuda çalışan uzmanları bir araya getirerek sinerji oluşturma görevini yine TÜDAV üstlendi. Memnuniyetle belirtmek gerekir ki bu çalıştay amacına ulaşmış 17 değişik kurumdan 30 uzman değişik konularda bildiriler sunarak konuya katkı sunmuşlardır.
    [Show full text]
  • RECON: Reef Effect Structures in the North Sea, Islands Or Connections?
    RECON: Reef effect structures in the North Sea, islands or connections? Summary Report Authors: Coolen, J.W.P. & R.G. Jak (eds.). Wageningen University & Research Report C074/17A RECON: Reef effect structures in the North Sea, islands or connections? Summary Report Revised Author(s): Coolen, J.W.P. & R.G. Jak (eds.). With contributions from J.W.P. Coolen, B.E. van der Weide, J. Cuperus, P. Luttikhuizen, M. Schutter, M. Dorenbosch, F. Driessen, W. Lengkeek, M. Blomberg, G. van Moorsel, M.A. Faasse, O.G. Bos, I.M. Dias, M. Spierings, S.G. Glorius, L.E. Becking, T. Schol, R. Crooijmans, A.R. Boon, H. van Pelt, F. Kleissen, D. Gerla, R.G. Jak, S. Degraer, H.J. Lindeboom Publication date: January 2018 Wageningen Marine Research Den Helder, January 2018 Wageningen Marine Research report C074/17A Coolen, J.W.P. & R.G. Jak (eds.) 2017. RECON: Reef effect structures in the North Sea, islands or connections? Summary Report Wageningen, Wageningen Marine Research, Wageningen Marine Research report C074/17A. 33 pp. Client: INSITE joint industry project Attn.: Richard Heard 6th Floor East, Portland House, Bressenden Place London SW1E 5BH, United Kingdom This report can be downloaded for free from https://doi.org/10.18174/424244 Wageningen Marine Research provides no printed copies of reports Wageningen Marine Research is ISO 9001:2008 certified. Photo cover: Udo van Dongen. © 2017 Wageningen Marine Research Wageningen UR Wageningen Marine Research The Management of Wageningen Marine Research is not responsible for resulting institute of Stichting Wageningen damage, as well as for damage resulting from the application of results or Research is registered in the Dutch research obtained by Wageningen Marine Research, its clients or any claims traderecord nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoogeography of the Holarctic Species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): Importance of the Bering Ian Refuge
    © Entomologica Fennica. 8.XI.l991 Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Bering ian refuge Kauri Mikkola, J, D. Lafontaine & V. S. Kononenko Mikkola, K., Lafontaine, J.D. & Kononenko, V. S. 1991 : Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Beringian refuge. - En to mol. Fennica 2: 157- 173. As a result of published and unpublished revisionary work, literature compi­ lation and expeditions to the Beringian area, 98 species of the Noctuidae are listed as Holarctic and grouped according to their taxonomic and distributional history. Of the 44 species considered to be "naturall y" Holarctic before this study, 27 (61 %) are confirmed as Holarctic; 16 species are added on account of range extensions and 29 because of changes in their taxonomic status; 17 taxa are deleted from the Holarctic list. This brings the total of the group to 72 species. Thirteen species are considered to be introduced by man from Europe, a further eight to have been transported by man in the subtropical areas, and five migrant species, three of them of Neotropical origin, may have been assisted by man. The m~jority of the "naturally" Holarctic species are associated with tundra habitats. The species of dry tundra are frequently endemic to Beringia. In the taiga zone, most Holarctic connections consist of Palaearctic/ Nearctic species pairs. The proportion ofHolarctic species decreases from 100 % in the High Arctic to between 40 and 75 % in Beringia and the northern taiga zone, and from between 10 and 20 % in Newfoundland and Finland to between 2 and 4 % in southern Ontario, Central Europe, Spain and Primorye.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea, Malacostraca) from the Bulgarian Black Sea Area
    ISSN 1314-3379 CHECKLIST OF MARINE AMPHIPODA (CRUSTACEA, MALACOSTRACA) FROM THE BULGARIAN BLACK SEA AREA S. Uzunova СПИСЪК НА МОРСКИТЕ АМФИПОДИ (CRUSTACEA, MALACOSTRACA) ОТ БЪЛГАРСКИЯ СЕКТОР НА ЧЕРНО МОРЕ С. Узунова Резюме : В настоящата публикация е обобщена наличната информация за морски видове от Разред Amphipoda (Crustacea, Malacostraca ) от българския сектор на Черно море . Съобщени са общо 55 вида морски амфиподи , принадлежащи към 26 семейства от разред Amphipoda. Ключови думи : Amphipoda, Crustacea, Black Sea, checklist . Introduction First information about Amphipoda from the Bulgarian Black Sea area is available in CHICHKOFF [9] and CASPERS [8]. VALKANOV [47] created the first catalogue of the Black Sea fauna from Bulgarian coastal area. Later on KUNEVA -ABADJIEVA [15] reported 46 amphipod species for the Bulgarian waters and the region of Bosphorus. In 1968 KUNEVA -ABADJIEVA [17] described for first time the species Cheirocratus sundevalli (RATHKE , 1843) for the Black Sea. VALKANOV &M ARINOV [44] added new 9 amphipod species. Several works on amphipod distribution and ecology were published by KUNEVA -ABADJIEVA [13, 14, 16, 18, 19], KUNEVA -ABADJIEVA & MARINOV [21,22], MARINOV & KUNEVA -ABADJIEVA [25], MARINOV et al. [26], MARINOV &S TOYKOV [27] and UZUNOVA [36,37,38,39]. MARINOV [23] summarized the number of amphipod species to 62, brackish water ones included. UZUNOVA [39] reported total of 46 species from the sublittoral and mediolitoral zone. More recent information about the distribution of amphipoda in the upper sublittoral and Zostera beds is found in UZUNOVA [40, 41]. The aim of the present paper is to update the information for the marine Amphipoda from the Bulgaria Black Sea area, according to the recent taxonomic advances.
    [Show full text]
  • Ctenostomatous Bryozoa from São Paulo, Brazil, with Descriptions of Twelve New Species
    Zootaxa 3889 (4): 485–524 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3889.4.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0256CD93-AE8A-475F-8EB7-2418DF510AC2 Ctenostomatous Bryozoa from São Paulo, Brazil, with descriptions of twelve new species LEANDRO M. VIEIRA1,2, ALVARO E. MIGOTTO2 & JUDITH E. WINSTON3 1Departamento de Zoologia, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE 50670-901, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] 2Centro de Biologia Marinha, Universidade de São Paulo, São Sebastião, SP 11600–000, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] 3Smithsonian Marine Station, 701 Seaway Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34949, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This paper describes 21 ctenostomatous bryozoans from the state of São Paulo, Brazil, based on specimens observed in vivo. A new family, Jebramellidae n. fam., is erected for a newly described genus and species, Jebramella angusta n. gen. et sp. Eleven other species are described as new: Alcyonidium exiguum n. sp., Alcyonidium pulvinatum n. sp., Alcyonidium torquatum n. sp., Alcyonidium vitreum n. sp., Bowerbankia ernsti n. sp., Bowerbankia evelinae n. sp., Bow- erbankia mobilis n. sp., Nolella elizae n. sp., Panolicella brasiliensis n. sp., Sundanella rosea n. sp., Victorella araceae n. sp. Taxonomic and ecological notes are also included for nine previously described species: Aeverrillia setigera (Hincks, 1887), Alcyonidium hauffi Marcus, 1939, Alcyonidium polypylum Marcus, 1941, Anguinella palmata van Beneden, 1845, Arachnoidella evelinae (Marcus, 1937), Bantariella firmata (Marcus, 1938) n. comb., Nolella sawayai Marcus, 1938, Nolella stipata Gosse, 1855 and Zoobotryon verticillatum (delle Chiaje, 1822).
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of Noctuid Moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae And
    Бiологiчний вiсник МДПУ імені Богдана Хмельницького 6 (2), стор. 87–97, 2016 Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 6 (2), pp. 87–97, 2016 ARTICLE UDC 595.786 CHECK LIST OF NOCTUID MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE AND EREBIDAE EXCLUDING LYMANTRIINAE AND ARCTIINAE) FROM THE SAUR MOUNTAINS (EAST KAZAKHSTAN AND NORTH-EAST CHINA) A.V. Volynkin1, 2, S.V. Titov3, M. Černila4 1 Altai State University, South Siberian Botanical Garden, Lenina pr. 61, Barnaul, 656049, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Tomsk State University, Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecology, Lenina pr. 36, 634050, Tomsk, Russia 3 The Research Centre for Environmental ‘Monitoring’, S. Toraighyrov Pavlodar State University, Lomova str. 64, KZ-140008, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan. E-mail: [email protected] 4 The Slovenian Museum of Natural History, Prešernova 20, SI-1001, Ljubljana, Slovenia. E-mail: [email protected] The paper contains data on the fauna of the Lepidoptera families Erebidae (excluding subfamilies Lymantriinae and Arctiinae) and Noctuidae of the Saur Mountains (East Kazakhstan). The check list includes 216 species. The map of collecting localities is presented. Key words: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Erebidae, Asia, Kazakhstan, Saur, fauna. INTRODUCTION The fauna of noctuoid moths (the families Erebidae and Noctuidae) of Kazakhstan is still poorly studied. Only the fauna of West Kazakhstan has been studied satisfactorily (Gorbunov 2011). On the faunas of other parts of the country, only fragmentary data are published (Lederer, 1853; 1855; Aibasov & Zhdanko 1982; Hacker & Peks 1990; Lehmann et al. 1998; Benedek & Bálint 2009; 2013; Korb 2013). In contrast to the West Kazakhstan, the fauna of noctuid moths of East Kazakhstan was studied inadequately.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Patterns of the Peracarid Crustaceans Associated with the Alga Corallina Elongata Along the Intertidal Rocky Shores of the Iberian Peninsula
    Helgol Mar Res (2011) 65:233–243 DOI 10.1007/s10152-010-0219-y ORIGINAL ARTICLE Distribution patterns of the peracarid crustaceans associated with the alga Corallina elongata along the intertidal rocky shores of the Iberian Peninsula D. Izquierdo • J. M. Guerra-Garcı´a Received: 9 February 2010 / Revised: 11 June 2010 / Accepted: 14 July 2010 / Published online: 28 July 2010 Ó Springer-Verlag and AWI 2010 Abstract Spatial patterns of intertidal peracarids, asso- distribution. Mediterranean species tolerated higher values ciated with the alga Corallina elongata, were studied along of conductivity and temperature, while Atlantic species the whole Iberian Peninsula. A total of 28,215 specimens were associated with stations characterized by higher were collected, comprising 78 different species (57 amphi- oxygen concentrations. pods, 16 isopods, 4 tanaids and 1 cumacean), most of them with Atlantic-Mediterranean distribution (60%) and Keywords Peracarida Á Iberian Peninsula Á Intertidal Á only 9% of Mediterranean endemics. Gammarids were Corallina elongata Á Biogeography dominant in abundance and number of species, represent- ing more than 70% of the total peracarids. The most common species collected during the present study were Introduction the caprellid Caprella penantis, the gammarids Hyale schmidti, Hyale stebbingi, Jassa cf. falcata and Stenothoe Understanding assemblages of organisms is based on the monoculoides, the isopod Ischyromene lacazei and the quantitative description of patterns of distribution and tanaid Tanais dulongii. Caprellids and tanaidaceans pre- abundance of species (Andrew and Mapstone 1987; sented their highest populations in the stations of the Strait Underwood et al. 2000), which has become one of the main of Gibraltar, whereas isopods were more abundant in challenges that studies on biogeography have to face Atlantic stations.
    [Show full text]