DOCSLIB.ORG

Read Book the Punic Wars: Rome, Carthage and the Struggle for the Mediterranean Ebook, Epub

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Read Book the Punic Wars: Rome, Carthage and the Struggle for the Mediterranean Ebook, Epub THE PUNIC WARS: ROME, CARTHAGE AND THE STRUGGLE FOR THE MEDITERRANEAN PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Nigel Bagnall | 368 pages | 02 Feb 1999 | Vintage Publishing | 9780712666084 | English | London, United Kingdom The Punic Wars: Rome, Carthage and the Struggle for the Mediterranean PDF Book Infantry were usually positioned in the centre of the battle line, with light infantry skirmishers to their front and cavalry on each flank. Give Feedback External Websites. Whittaker, C. In they captured the important fortress of Panormus Palermo , but when Carthage threw reinforcements into the island the war again came to a standstill. Escape the Present with These 24 Historical Romances. In B. The Carthaginians accordingly opened negotiations and consented to a peace by which they ceded Sicily and the Lipari Eolie Islands to Rome and paid an indemnity of 3, talents. Carthaginian possessions. But Hasdrubal, knowing how crucial this territory was, did not give up. However, the majority of Rome's allies remained loyal, including many in southern Italy. Around the same time, in Spain, Scipio was making his mark. External Websites. Briscoe, John Ercte — and Mt. The accuracy of Polybius's account has been much debated over the past years, but the modern consensus is to accept it largely at face value, and the details of the war in modern sources are largely based on interpretations of Polybius's account. While they did so, they also picked fights with the allies the Carthaginians had made in Roman territory, expanding the war into North Africa and further into Spain. The origin of these conflicts is to be found in the position which Rome acquired, about bce , as leader and protector of all Italy. But all this hardship, all this struggle, is worth it. Battle has been your reality many times on your journey from Spain to Italy. Coarelli, Filippo In B. Some members of the city council denounced his actions and Hasdrubal had them too put to death and took control of the city. They fought valiantly, but eventually the Roman forces, who significantly outnumbered them, pushed them back and made their way into the city. The immense effort of repeatedly building large fleets of galleys during the war laid the foundation for Rome's maritime dominance for years. The Punic Wars: Rome, Carthage and the Struggle for the Mediterranean Writer In the century prior to the Punic Wars, boarding had become increasingly common and ramming had declined, as the larger and heavier vessels adopted in this period lacked the speed and manoeuvrability necessary to ram, while their sturdier construction reduced the ram's effect even in case of a successful attack. Ercte — and Mt. Community Reviews. II 1 : 47— It is a debatable point whether his attack contravened the new treaty. The engagement began, and Hannibal sent his elephants — the heavy artillery of the time — towards the Romans. It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. Pollard, Elizabeth Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Lists with This Book. The biggest army ever formed in Roman history had been completely destroyed by a force remarkably smaller than its own, and most of its allies in Italy had defected over to the Carthaginian side, leaving them weak and isolated. Shutt, Rowland These Carthaginian war elephants — which were the tanks of ancient warfare; responsible for carrying equipment, supplies, and using their immensity to storm over enemies, crushing them in their tracks — helped make Hannibal the famous figure he is today. New York: W. Scipio Africanus arrived in Spain in B. The battle was hardfought; each clang of a sword and smash of a shield shifted the balance between the two great powers. All of this might never have happened if Hannibal had gotten some help from his friends while campaigning in Italy. First, it gave Rome a distinct edge in Spain. After setting up his army to blockade the only land exit from Cartago Nova and after using his fleet to restrict access to the sea, he was able to break his way into the city that had been left to be defended by only 2, militia men — the nearest army that could assist them being a ten-day march away. A gross breach of the treaty was perpetrated when a Roman force was sent to occupy Sardinia , whose insurgent garrison had offered to surrender the island Refresh and try again. Bringmann, Klaus Hannibal was still winning battles, despite having been starved of resources. The Punic Wars: Rome, Carthage and the Struggle for the Mediterranean Reviews They had loaded most of their troops in the center of their line, hoping to break through the Carthaginian defense. In doing so, they negated the Roman javelin throwers and quickly encircled their opponent, leaving the Roman army helpless and resoundingly defeated. The Carthaginians were again beaten; [83] this was possibly the largest naval battle in history by the number of combatants involved. As novice shipwrights , the Romans built copies that were heavier than the Carthaginian vessels, and so slower and less manoeuvrable. He met little resistance from local forces allied to Rome. The Romans facing Hannibal in southern Italy tricked him into believing the whole Roman army was still in camp, while a large portion marched north and reinforced the Romans facing Hasdrubal. The Peloponnesian War marked a significant power shift in ancient Greece, favoring Sparta, and also ushered in a period of regional decline that signaled the But with a weak and weary army — one that had been fighting and marching near non-stop for almost 2 years — Hannibal decided not to pursue any further, retreating once again and quieting the war for the cold winter months. Their next confrontation — the Battle of Trebia — further stoked Roman fears and established Hannibal as a highly-skilled commander who just might have had what it took to conquer Rome. See Article History. Edwell, Peter []. At the start of the war Carthage was the dominant power of the western Mediterranean , with an extensive maritime empire; while Rome was a rapidly expanding power in Italy , with a strong army but a weak navy. But this success was an illusion. The loss of naval supremacy not only deprived the Carthaginians of their predominance in the western Mediterranean but exposed their overseas empire to disintegration under renewed attacks by Rome. Learn More about Carthage. He then charged into the legions from behind. Worlds Together Worlds Apart. Punic Wars. The approximate extent of territory controlled by Rome and Carthage immediately before the start of the First Punic War. However, its important to mention that in the Second Punic War, Rome had an advantage over Carthage geographically, even though the war was fought on Roman soil, and they had control of the sea around Italy, preventing Carthaginian supplies from arriving. The " Hellenistic Prince ", tentatively identified as Scipio Aemilianus []. Victory at the Battle of Utica put Rome firmly in control in Africa, and Scipio would continue his advance towards Carthaginian territory. Sicily remained firmly in Roman hands, blocking the ready seaborne reinforcement and resupply of Hannibal from Carthage. This time, it was the Romans that had walked into the trap. They besieged and captured the Carthaginian base at Agrigentum in but made little impression upon the Carthaginian fortresses in the west of the island and upon the towns of the interior. His work was continued by his son-in-law Hasdrubal and his son Hannibal , who was placed at the head of the army in It will bring the chance to put Carthage in its rightful place — atop the world, leader of all men. Subscribe today. The Roman commander, nevertheless, persisted in throwing troops into the city, and, by seizing the Carthaginian admiral during a parley, induced him to withdraw. From afar, it looked as though thousands of torches were moving on the mountainside. This reality was not hidden from the Romans, and it was likely why they chose to reject peace. The corvus , the Roman ship boarding device. Later the same year a mutiny broke out among Roman troops, which initially attracted support from Iberian leaders, disappointed that Roman forces had remained in the peninsula after the expulsion of the Carthaginians, but it was effectively put down by Scipio. The Senate divided the command, but they did not give the generals orders on how to do it, and the two men — both likely upset over not being granted autonomous control, and likely motivated by those pesky macho egos characteristic of ambitious war generals — chose to split the army in two. Wikimedia Commons. Roman possessions. Much of the First Punic War was fought on, or in the waters near, Sicily. Upon finding Spain without Hannibal, the Romans began to sweat. In the Battle of Cannae the Roman legions forced their way through Hannibal's deliberately weak centre, but Libyan heavy infantry on the wings swung around their advance, menacing their flanks. He had to fight to get permission from the Senate to stage an invasion of Africa, as the heavy losses sustained by Roman forces in Spain and Italy had left Roman leaders reluctant to sanction another attack, but soon he was allowed to do so. Showing This, plus the cold snowy weather gracing the battlefield that day, prevented Hannibal from chasing the Roman army and beating them while they were down, a move that would have dealt a nearly-fatal blow. Carthage withstood the Roman siege for two years before a change of Roman command put the young general Scipio Aemilianus later known as Scipio the Younger in charge of the North Africa campaign in B. The Punic Wars: Rome, Carthage and the Struggle for the Mediterranean Read Online Background and First Punic War B.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Glimpse Into the Roman Finances of the Second Punic War Through
    Letter Geochemical Perspectives Letters the history of the western world. Carthage was a colony founded next to modern Tunis in the 8th century BC by Phoenician merchants. During the 3rd century BC its empire expanded westward into southern Spain and Sardinia, two major silver producers of the West Mediterranean. Meanwhile, Rome’s grip had tight- © 2016 European Association of Geochemistry ened over the central and southern Italian peninsula. The Punic Wars marked the beginning of Rome’s imperial expansion and ended the time of Carthage. A glimpse into the Roman finances The First Punic War (264 BC–241 BC), conducted by a network of alliances in Sicily, ended up with Rome prevailing over Carthage. A consequence of this of the Second Punic War conflict was the Mercenary War (240 BC–237 BC) between Carthage and its through silver isotopes unpaid mercenaries, which Rome helped to quell, again at great cost to Carthage. Hostilities between the two cities resumed in 219 BC when Hannibal seized the F. Albarède1,2*, J. Blichert-Toft1,2, M. Rivoal1, P. Telouk1 Spanish city of Saguntum, a Roman ally. At the outbreak of the Second Punic War, Hannibal crossed the Alps into the Po plain and inflicted devastating mili- tary defeats on the Roman legions in a quick sequence of major battles, the Trebia (December 218 BC), Lake Trasimene (June 217 BC), and Cannae (August 216 BC). As a measure of the extent of the disaster, it was claimed that more than 100,000 Abstract doi: 10.7185/geochemlet.1613 Roman soldiers and Italian allies lost their lives in these three battles, including The defeat of Hannibal’s armies at the culmination of the Second Punic War (218 BC–201 three consuls.
    [Show full text]
  • Hannibal, Practical Experience, and the Model Historian
    Chapter 2 Hannibal, Practical Experience, and the Model Historian 1 Introduction The previous chapter demonstrated that, despite his belief in the didactic pur- pose of history, Polybius places considerable emphasis on the instructive value of practical experience. As this chapter will show, the significance of practical experience for Polybius becomes evident not just in the digressions and pro- grammatic passages discussed previously but also in his narrative of historical events. Polybius’ depiction of Hannibal, the great Carthaginian leader and ad- versary of Rome, is a model example of the importance of practical experience in Polybius’ narrative. In contrast to other leading figures prominent only in the later, fragmentary books of Polybius, the surviving early books preserve a more complete account of Hannibal’s early progression from a young man to a more seasoned commander. This presents an opportunity to trace the impact of practical experience on the development of an individual who had a pro- found impact in the events recorded in Polybius’ work.1 When Polybius pauses in Book Nine (9.22–6) to reflect upon the character (φύσις, 9.22.7) of Hannibal,2 he claims that Hannibal alone was the cause of all that happened both to the Romans and to the Carthaginians in the Second Punic war (9.22.1). Polybius here singles out Hannibal as a great and marvelous subject (μέγα τι φύεται χρῆμα καὶ θαυμάσιον, 9.22.6). The choice of the adjective θαυμάσιον holds important historiographical weight – both for Polybius and 1 Pédech (1964), 204–53 provides a full discussion of the pivotal role that historical agents play in shaping the events of history in Polybius’ text.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Rome – Wars and Battles the Ancient Romans Fought Many Battles and Wars in Order to Expand and Protect Their Empire
    Ancient Rome – Wars and Battles The Ancient Romans fought many battles and wars in order to expand and protect their empire. There were also civil wars where Romans fought Romans in order to gain power. Here are some of the major battles and wars that the Romans fought. The Punic Wars The Punic Wars were fought between Rome and Carthage from 264 BC to 146 BC. Carthage was a large City located on the coast of North Africa. This sounds like a long way away at first, but Carthage was just a short sea voyage from Rome across the Mediterranean Sea. Both cities were major powers at the time and both were expanding their empires. As the empires grew, they began to clash and soon war had begun. There were three major parts of the Punic wars and they were fought over the course of more than 100 years, First Punic War (264 - 241 BC): The First Punic War was fought largely over the island of Sicily. This meant a lot of the fighting was at sea where Carthage had the advantage of a much stronger navy than Rome. However, Rome quickly built up a large navy of over 100 ships. Rome also invented the corvus, a type of assault bridge that allowed Rome's superior soldiers to board enemy navy vessels. Rome soon dominated Carthage and won the war. Second Punic War (218 - 201 BC): In the Second Punic War, Carthage had more success fighting against the Roman legions. The Carthage leader and general, Hannibal, made a daring crossing of the Alps to attack Rome and northern Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Rome Conquers the Western Mediterranean (264-146 B.C.) the Punic Wars
    Rome Conquers the Western Mediterranean (264-146 B.C.) The Punic Wars After subjugating the Greek colonies in southern Italy, Rome sought to control western Mediterranean trade. Its chief rival, located across the Mediterranean in northern Africa, was the city-state of Carthage. Originally a Phoenician colony, Carthage had become a powerful commercial empire. Rome defeated Carthage in three Punic (Phoenician) Wars and gained mastery of the western Mediterranean. The First Punic War (264-241 B.C.) Fighting chiefly on the island of Sicily and in the Mediterranean Sea, Rome’s citizen-soldiers eventually defeated Carthage’s mercenaries(hired foreign soldiers). Rome annexed Sicily and then Sardinia and Corsica. Both sides prepared to renew the struggle. Carthage acquired a part of Spain and recruited Spanish troops. Rome consolidated its position in Italy by conquering the Gauls, thereby extending its rule northward from the Po River to the Alps. The Second Punic War (218-201 B.C.) Hannibal, Carthage’s great general, led an army from Spain across the Alps and into Italy. At first he won numerous victories, climaxed by the battle of Cannae. However, he was unable to seize the city of Rome. Gradually the tide of battle turned in favor of Rome. The Romans destroyed a Carthaginian army sent to reinforce Hannibal, then conquered Spain, and finally invaded North Africa. Hannibal withdrew his army from Italy to defend Carthage but, in the Battle of Zama, was at last defeated. Rome annexed Carthage’s Spanish provinces and reduced Carthage to a second-rate power. Hannibal of Carthage Reasons for Rome’s Victory • superior wealth and military power, • the loyalty of most of its allies, and • the rise of capable generals, notably Fabius and Scipio.
    [Show full text]
  • Carthaginian Mercenaries: Soldiers of Fortune, Allied Conscripts, and Multi-Ethnic Armies in Antiquity Kevin Patrick Emery Wofford College
    Wofford College Digital Commons @ Wofford Student Scholarship 5-2016 Carthaginian Mercenaries: Soldiers of Fortune, Allied Conscripts, and Multi-Ethnic Armies in Antiquity Kevin Patrick Emery Wofford College Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wofford.edu/studentpubs Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Emery, Kevin Patrick, "Carthaginian Mercenaries: Soldiers of Fortune, Allied Conscripts, and Multi-Ethnic Armies in Antiquity" (2016). Student Scholarship. Paper 11. http://digitalcommons.wofford.edu/studentpubs/11 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Wofford. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Wofford. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wofford College Carthaginian Mercenaries: Soldiers of Fortune, Allied Conscripts, and Multi-Ethnic Armies in Antiquity An Honors Thesis Submitted to The Faculty of the Department of History In Candidacy For An Honors Degree in History By Kevin Patrick Emery Spartanburg, South Carolina May 2016 1 Introduction The story of the mercenary armies of Carthage is one of incompetence and disaster, followed by clever innovation. It is a story not just of battles and betrayal, but also of the interactions between dissimilar peoples in a multiethnic army trying to coordinate, fight, and win, while commanded by a Punic officer corps which may or may not have been competent. Carthaginian mercenaries are one piece of a larger narrative about the struggle between Carthage and Rome for dominance in the Western Mediterranean, and their history illustrates the evolution of the mercenary system employed by the Carthaginian Empire to extend her power and ensure her survival.
    [Show full text]
  • A Roman in Name Only’, Eras Edition 13, Issue 2, June 2012
    Dustin Cranford, ‘A Roman in Name Only’, Eras Edition 13, Issue 2, June 2012 A Roman in Name Only: An Onomastic Study of Cultural Assimilation and Integration in Roman Spain Dustin Cranford (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, NC, USA) Abstract: This paper studies the evolution of naming practices in Roman Spain as way to measure the limits of Romanization and determine the persistence of the indigenous culture. Onomastic evidence suggests that the indigenous population actively integrated itself into the Roman culture on its own terms, taking and leaving aspects of the Roman nomenclature at will in order to display romanitas, or Romanness. Upon close inspection, the names of many Hispano-Romans reveal a population that exhibited volition and agency in the process of Romanization. Variations in Roman naming components (e.g. voting tribes, filiations, tria nomina, etc.) show a selective adoption of the Roman nomenclature, while indigenous stems point to the persistence of many aspects of the indigenous culture. While there are many definitions and theories to Romanization, this study adopts what Leonard Curchin has described as the Integration Model, where the exchange between the Roman and indigenous culture produces a third, hybrid culture, or a provincial culture. Naming customs in Roman Spain point to the emergence of this provincial culture, one that adopted many features of Roman society, but equally preserved aspects of native Iberian customs. This study will explore various aspects of this topic, including the history of Roman Spain, the various parts of Roman nomenclature, and the actual onomastic evidence found in the Spanish provinces.
    [Show full text]
  • The Punic Wars Group Magazine Project
    THE PUNIC WARS GROUP MAGAZINE PROJECT From 264-146 B.C., a series of wars was fought between Rome and their Mediterranean rival, Carthage. By the end of the third Punic War, Carthage was left in ruins and Rome had established itself as the dominant force in the Mediterranean world. Your group’s task is to detail these three history altering wars in the form of a historical magazine. Below is a list of requirements for this magazine. Individuals within the groups must share the workload evenly. Teamwork is IMPERATIVE!! Projects are due on Monday, April 11th. REQUIREMENTS Cover Page o Magazine Title o Focus Picture with a caption o Individuals names from the group o Inside front cover should be a magazine table of contents 3 Main Articles o Cause/War/Effect of the First Punic War o Cause/War/Effect of the Second Punic War o Cause/War/Effect of the Third Punic War . Articles should include factual information about dates, important people, major battles, and how these wars affected BOTH Rome and Carthage. 1 Interview o You will interview one of the important people from any of the Punic Wars. Interviews must include a minimum of 5 thought provoking questions and detailed responses. Responses are to include factual information and written from the personal perspective/opinion of the person. Groups can interview any of the following. Scipio Africanus . Cato the Elder . Hamilcar Barca . Hannibal Barca . Hasdrubal . A separate person of the group’s choice that played a major role in the Punic Wars 1 Biography o You will create a biography of an important person from the Punic Wars.
    [Show full text]
  • 274To 146B.C
    PUNIC WARS 274 TO 146 B.C. FIRST PUNIC WAR TO DESTRUCTION OF CARTHAGE ERA SUMMARY – PUNIC WARS The period of the Punic and Macedonian Wars was a critical one in Rome's history. At the dawn of the Punic Wars, in 264 B.C., Rome was master of Italy, but controlled no colonies or provinces outside of the Peninsula. She had neither a navy nor a merchant based economy. One hundred and twenty years later, she had entirely subdued both the Carthaginian empire in the west and the Macedonian empire in the east. She had provinces and allies throughout the Mediterranean and was the undisputed master of the seas. Although it took another century to expand and consolidate her power, by the end of the Punic Wars Rome had laid the foundation of an empire. The Punic Wars, which raged between the city of Carthage and Rome for over a century, were so named because the Carthaginians were of the Phoenician (or Punic) race. There were three Punic Wars, but the second was by far the most critical. The first Punic War lasted 24 years, involved many skirmishes, and was won primarily by perseverance. Rome gained a small amount of Carthaginian territory but never achieved a decisive victory. Carthage capitulated as much because of internal troubles as due to pressure from Rome. However, this war did much to establish Rome as a naval power. The best known Roman hero of the first Punic War was Regulus, and the best known Carthaginian heroes were Xanthippus and Hamilcar. The second Punic War was a great catastrophe for Rome and all of Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Rome Grade 3 | Unit 2
    Ancient Rome Grade 3 | Unit 2 Timeline Cards Subject Matter Expert Michael Carter Illustration and Photo Credits Chapter 1 Card 1 Jed Henry Chapter 13 ACME Imagery/Superstock Chapter 4 Jacob Wyatt Chapter 14 Scott Hammond Chapter 5 Card 1 Jacob Wyatt Chapter 16 Card 1 Emperor Constantine presenting his city to the Virgin and Child at Hagia Chapter 5 Card 2 Jacob Wyatt Sophia (mosaic), Byzantine 10th c/Haghia Sophia, Istanbul, Turkey/ Pictures from History/Bridgeman Images Chapter 7 Card 1 Jacob Wyatt Chapter 16 Card 2 City walls, built during reign of Theodosius II (408-50) in AD 412-22, Chapter 7 Card 2 Jacob Wyatt Byzantine / Istanbul, Turkey / Bridgeman Images Chapter 8 Jacob Wyatt Chapter 16 Card 3 Jacob Wyatt Creative Commons Licensing This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 4.0 International License. You are free: to Share—to copy, distribute, and transmit the work to Remix—to adapt the work Under the following conditions: Attribution—You must attribute the work in the following manner: This work is based on an original work of the Core Knowledge® Foundation made available through licensing under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This does not in any way imply that the Core Knowledge Foundation endorses this work. Noncommercial—You may not use this work for commercial purposes. Share Alike—If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one. With the understanding that: For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Punic Wars by SPI by George Nap
    Wargame Replay - Iberian interlude - Punic Wars by SPI By George Nap This is my second go round at this game, attacking cities without overwhelming odds is suicide. The automatic victory total is 80 resource points, so that is a long way away for both sides. I will try to be methodical in my play and will probably fail. But it is all for fun. I will just try for an overview of each turn rather than a play-by-play. (If you want a real feel for the flow of the game system, go to my First Punic War replay previously posted.) Game notes: I think there is a case to be made for a zero, or even negative rated Roman leader, given the disasters that befell them during these wars. The counter mix has one three rated leader, a two rated leader and a host of one rated leaders. Turn 1 218 BCE D: Hispania revolts, but a fortunate roll results in no losses, so no effect. R:34. Since you must mainatain a garrison equal to one half the value of a non-native province to control it, and you must control it to build in it the forces in Hispania will stay put. Hannibal leaves a garrison in Tarraconesis and occupies Narboneensis and Gallia. (This was a difficult choice for me to make, my bent is to attack the Romans immediately, but given history this is a year campaigning to subdue these two territories. Let Rome do what Rome will do.) 8 supply points, four ASP built in Hispania to free up the army there to move.
    [Show full text]
  • Carthaginian Casualties: the Socioeconomic Effects of the Losses Sustained in the First Punic War
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Theses Department of History 8-9-2016 Carthaginian Casualties: The Socioeconomic Effects of the Losses Sustained in the First Punic War Laura Valiani Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses Recommended Citation Valiani, Laura, "Carthaginian Casualties: The Socioeconomic Effects of the Losses Sustained in the First Punic War." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2016. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses/108 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CARTHAGINIAN CASUALTIES: THE SOCIOECONOMIC EFFECTS OF THE LOSSES SUSTAINED IN THE FIRST PUNIC WAR by LAURA VALIANI Under the Direction of Lela Urquhart, PhD ABSTRACT This thesis seeks to investigate the short- and long-term socio-economic impact of the First Punic War on Carthage and its people. It will do so by exploring three parts of the Carthaginian political and socio-economic system during the fourth through the second centuries BCE. The first is its navy, and specifically the costs – in both material and man – of its use. This will be the subject of the first chapter. The second analyses the additional expenditures which the war extracted from Carthage, such as the outlays to recruit, maintain, and provide for the land army. The final chapter focuses on the long-term ramifications of the war, which will be explored by means of an in-depth analysis of the last few battles of the First Punic War from an economic angle.
    [Show full text]
  • Excellence Redefined: the Evolution of Virtus in Ancient Rome
    Excellence Redefined: The Evolution of Virtus in Ancient Rome A thesis submitted to Miami University Honors Program in partial fulfillment of the requirements for University Honors with Distinction by Emily J. Trygstad May 2010 Oxford, Ohio i Abstract While there has been extensive academic research for over a thousand years in the field of Classics, it is impressive to note just how much research still needs to be done. For my thesis, I plan to take some of my own personal academic interest and channel it into a largely understudied topic: the evolution of the Roman value of virtus, and the effects that this change produced in Roman society. Virtus, which was in many ways held to be the paramount quality an ancient Roman male could possess, was initially expressed through an assertion of martial prowess. No simple translation for this ideal exists, however; “bravery” or “manliness”, while sometimes used, do not fully render the complex importance of virtus. Historian Myles McDonnell sums the notion up best: “the relationship... between virtus and all the other things the Romans valued – liberty, property, family, and fatherland – is one of dependence. Virtus embraces all that is good because it is virtus that guards and preserves all that is good” (McDonnell, 32). Over the course of time, however, history sees virtus make a gradual shift as an ideal manifested through military distinction to a more liberal celebration of “excellence”, not dissimilar from the Greek notion of‟αρετή. While most classicists and historians alike seem to agree that the ideal did indeed evolve over time, the study of what caused this shift has only barely been explored.
    [Show full text]