ANDHRA PRADESH POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD ~c;1iiD ANDHIItA PRAO«.M REGIONAL OFFICE, VIJAYAWADA. ~...... ,-, .., .J Plot No.41, Sri Kanakadwga Officers, Colony, Gurunanak Road, Vijayawada- 8. ~,.r, Phone No. :0866-2543542.
Lr.No. K- 2061/PCB/RO-VJN2017- q8.5 Date St:>-12-2017
To
Sri S.K. Srivastava The Director, IA-11 Division,. Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change, Indira Paryavaran Bhawan, Jor Bagh Road, New Delhi-11 0003
Sir, Sub:- APPCB- RO- VJA- M/s. Sarvani Labs Pvt. Ltd., Jayanthipuram (V), Jaggaiahpet (M), Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh --Proceedings of the public hearing held on 22-12-2017 at 03.00 PM at Jayanthipuram (V), Jaggaiahpet (M), Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh - Minutes of the Public Hearing -submitted - Reg. ·
Ref:- 1. EIA Notification No. S.O. No. 1533, dated 14-09-06 and its amendments thereof, issued by the MoE&F, GOI. 2. TOR F.No.J-11011/38/2017-IA-11(1), dt. 31-05-2017 3. Public hearing held on 22-12-2017.
****** With reference to above it is to submit that Public Hearing was conducted on 22-12-2017 at Jayathipuram (V), Jaggaiahpet (M), Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh with respect to establishment of bulk drug and intermediate manufacturing unit proposed by M/s. Sarvan Labs Pvt. Ltd.
Copies of the Paper advertisements, Public Hearing attendance, minutes of the public hearing, Statement of representations received along with proponent's response and Videography are herewith enclosed for kind information and for taking necessary action.
Yours faithfully, EJv ENVIR Encls:- 1. Approved Mi_nutes of the Public Hearing ~ 2. Paper Advertisements. .3a\ 12-\n 3. Statement of representations received and proponent's response 4. Copy of the Representations 5. Attendance of PH 6. Videography of public hearing
Copy submitted to the Member Secretary, A.P.Pollution Control Board, Vijayawada for favor of kind information. File No.APPC-INDOCR/3/2017-EE(PCB)-APPCB(KRSN)
MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON 22.12.2017 AT JAYANTHIPURAM (V), JAGGAIAHPET (M), KRISHNA DISTRICT FOR THE PROPOSAL FOR MANUFACTURING OF BULK DRUGS AND INTERMEDIATES BY -M/s. SARVANI LABS PVT., AT SY. NO. 109, JAYANTHIPURAM (V), JAGGAIAHPET (M), KRISHNA DISTRICT.
PANEL MEMBERS:
1. Sri B. R.Ambedkar, Chairman, District Revenue Officer & Additional District Magistrate, Krishna Dist.
2. Sri E.Satyanarayana, Rept. of A.P.Pollution Control Environmental Engineer Board, Regional Office, Vijayawada, Krishna Dist., Andhra Pradesh.
Industry Representatives :
Sri K.Venkata Mahesh, Managing Director, M/s.Sarvani Labs Pvt. Ltd.,
Environmental Consultants : .... Sri Yarlagadda Venkata Prasad, M/s. Rightsource tnudstrial Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
At the outset, the · Environmental Engineer, APPCB, RO, Vijayawada welcomed the public gathered for the Environmental Public Hearing and briefed about the proposal of M/s. Sarvani Labs Pvt. Ltd., that they proposed to set up a unit for manufacturing of bulk drugs and intermediates at Jayanthipuram (V), Jaggaiahpet (M), Krishna Dist. with an investment of Rs.6.38 crores. He further informed that as per the Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change, GOI Notification, dated 14.09.2006, for the
projects list~d in Category-A 5(f) of the Schedule; Environmental Public Hearing is mandatory to be conducted as part of obtaining Environmental Clearance (EC). In accordance with the procedure prescribed for the public hearing in the MoE&F notification dt. 14.09.2006, the AP Pollution Control Board, Vijayawada issued press
advertisement in Eenadu (Telugu) an~ Indian Express (English) daily news papers on 20.11.2017 about the environmental public hearing inviting concerns of the public, comments, views, objections, apprehensions, clarifications and suggestions etc., if any, on the project proposal in writing from the public, bonafied residents, environmental groups and others located near the proposed project area likely to be &&c4 Page 1 of 9 ~li affected for a minimum period of 30 days. He added that the copies of Draft Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report and the Executive Summary in Telugu & English were made available to the Public at the places mentioned in the advertisement. During the period of 30 days from the date of issue of advertisement, the ~p Pollution Control Board received the representations from the following: i. Sri Sandala Srinivasa Rao , Jaggaiahpet, Krishna Dist. ii. Sri Kota Indira, Williampeta, Jaggaiahpet, Krishna Dist. iii. Sri D.John Paul, Jaggaiahpet, Krishna Dist. iv. Sri H.Madflubabu, President, Rural Environment Education and Health Awareness Society, Hyderabad (through mail). v. Sri V.Sunanda Reddy, NGO, Hyderabad (through mail). The same were forwarded to project proponent for their response. He added that the proceeding of the public hearing would be submitted to MoEF &CC, GOI., along with the statement of representations received and the proponents ....., response for taking further necessary action. He requested the District Revenue Officer & Additional District Magistrate, Krishna district to conduct the proceedings. Sri B.R.Ambedkar, District Revenue Officer & Addl. District Magistrate, Krishna District while welcoming the public and press stated that the purposes of the public hearing is to obtain the views I suggestions I objections of the public and the officials would note down the public views. The Proceedings and video of the public hearing would be forwarded to MoEF, Gal for further course of action. He requested the public who attended the meeting to express their comments, views, objections, apprehensions, clarifications and suggestions etc., if any, on the project proposal. Then he requested the management of the project to explain in detail about the proposed bulk drug industry its environmental impacts and control measures proposed. Sri K.Venkata Mahesh, Managing Director of ~ M/s. Sarvani Labs Pvt., while ' briefing about the project informed that they proposed to establish a bulk drugs and intermediates manufacturing industry in an extent of 2.93 Acres at Sy No: 109, Jayanthipuram Village, Jaggayyapet Mandai, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh with an investment of of Rs. 6.38 Crores which includes construction of the buildings, equipment, machinery and greenbelt development. Page 2 of 9 arflftO~ EN1 AL ENI tN e~f' A. P. Po!\utio;:"~ Co:~trol B(\ard PLOT No, 41. GURUNANAK k v AD - l ~tr&I\I&ICAnltRGA OFFICER'S COLON' File No.APPC-INDOCR/3/2017 -EE(PCB)-APPCB(KRSN) He informed that the project proposal was considered and appraised by the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) in its 20th Meeting held during 27th - 28th February, 2017. The -MoEF&CC has given Terms of Reference vide F. No: J-11011/38/2017-IA II (I) Dated on 3Pt May 2017, to carryout EIA Study. The Environmental monitoring and analysis were carried out during the period of March - 2017 to May - 2017 and Draft EIA Report was prepared and submitted for Public Consultation. He assured the gathering that they would operate the unit after taking into confidence of the public in terms of pollution control measures. He assured that the management would allocate funds of Rs.32 lakhs for the welfare of surrounding villages under Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). He appealed the public to understand the technical details of the project and to clarify their apprehensions. ~ -, Then he requested their environmental consultant to brief about technical issues of the project. Sri Yarlagadda Venkata Prasad, Representative of M/s. Rightsource Industrial Solutions Pvt. Ltd, informed that they have conducted Environmental Impact Assessment studies on the proposed project which includes baseline studies before establishment of the industry and impact assessment on the Environment after establishment and operation of the industry. He informed that the base line data were monitored and collected during the study period of March 2017- May 2017. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring (AAQM) was carried out at eight locations surrounding the proposed project and results obtained are observed to be well within CPCB standards. The Maximum concentration of Particulate Matter (PM 10) is recorded to be 69.73 (Jg/ m 3 at Dhrmavarappadu Tanda against the CPCB standard of 100 (Jg/ 11) 3 and maximum concentration of Particulate Matter (PM2.s) is noted as 3 3 28.21 (Jg/ m at Jaggayap~t against the CPCB standard of 60 (Jg/ m • Sulpur dioxide (S02) is observed to be maximum of 17.84 (Jg/ m 3 at Dhramavarappadu Tanda, 3 which is also well within the CPCB standard of 80 (Jg/ m • Maximum concentrations of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) was observed to be 25.39 (Jg/ m 3 prevailing at the time of sampling at Dhramavarappadu Tanda which is also well below the prescribed limit of 80 (Jg/ m3.The highest value of Carbon Monoxide (CO) is recorded as 0.85 mgt m 3 3 at the project site against the prescribed standard of 2 mg/ m • The Highest value of Page 3 of 9 ~~ A.P. Pollutian Control Boar.t PLOT No. 41, GURUNANAK ROAD File No.APPC-INDOCR/3/2017 -EE(PCB)-APPCB(KRSN) Ammonia (NH3) is observed to be 26.24 1-Jg/ m3 at Jaggayyapet, which is well below the prescribed limit of 400 1-Jg/ m3. Ground water samples and .surface water samples were collected at 8 locations in the study area. The analysis results of the samples collected were studied and found to be acceptable limits of IS-10500, for parameters TDS, Total hardness, Total Alkalinity, Calcium, Magnesium and Chlorides. Noise level monitoring was carried out at eight locations and the noise levels at all the locations were below the permissible limits. On data obtained, the soil quality around the site is appropriate and normal in terms of soil contaminants. The predicted ground level concentrations when added to Baseline scenario, the ·4• . overall scenario levels of PM, S02 and NOx are well within the permissible limits as specified by NAAQ Standards. He briefed about the project details and Environmental Management Plant as follows. • The total production capacity of Bulk drugs and Intermediates will be 9.00 TPM consisting of five products. Solvents will be recovered upto 95% using distillation column with necessary cooling condensers. • Total water requirement of the project will be 38.50 KLD for Process, washings, Boiler Makeup, cooling towers makeup, scrubber, domestic and greenbelt purpose. The waste water generation will be 10.64 KLD which is from process, floor & reactor washes, cooling tower blow down, boiler blow down, scrubber, DM plant and domestic usage. The waste water is segregated into HTDS effluent and L TDS effluent. Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) concept will be adopted for treatment and disposal of effluent. The Effluent Treatment system consists of steam stripper, MEE system with 10 KLD capacity & ATFD. Further the Biological Treatment with 15 KLD capacity and Reverse Osmosis plant will be installed for treatment of effluents generated from plant operations. ~ Page 4 of9 ~ ENV1PIONM.F.N1 Al EN<:>!Hl':D A.P. Pollution Control Beard ftLOT No. 41, GURUN;.;.~AK ROAD •• KANAKADURGA OFFICER'S COLON\ Fl,/.47 ~WAD.4 • SXJ .flU . ' File No.APPC-INDOCR/3/2017 -EE(PCB)-APPCB(KRSN) From ZLD system 8.87 KLD of water will be recovered and reused for plant operations. Hence, the fresh water requirement will be 29.63 KLD and also informed that the project authorities obtained permission for with drawl of ground water from the SGWD. • Power requirement for the project is 500 KVA for plant operations. A DG Set of 320 KVA will be installed. • 3 TPH Coal Fired Boiler will be installed, provided with Cyclone Separator followed by Bag filter and the stack height of 30 Mtrs for good dispersion. The Predicted proce~s emissions are S02, 0 2, H2 & HCI from manufacturing process of proposed products and these emissions will be mitigated using two stage scrubber. The industry will take measures for reduction of fugitive emissions emanating . out of process reactions by providing vent condensers. • The Solid waste and Hazardous waste generated will be disposed as per the rules. There will not be any leakages I spillage from the raw-materials storage. The generated hazardous waste will be stored on floor with suitable packing and this dedicated area will be covered with the roof. • Extensive oiling, lubrication and preventive maintenance will be carried out for the machineries and equipments to reduce noise generation. Further, green belt development also reduces the noise pollution. • It is proposed to develop 4329.25 Sqm (i.e 36.87 %) of green belt in the total site area of 11843 Sqm. He further informed that M/s. Sarvani Labs Pvt Ltd has committed to implement all the pollution control measures to protect the surrounding environment by adopting Zero-Liquid-Discharge System for all its Effluents, by controlling process emissions and Safe-Disposal of all Solid Wastes generated either as . process wastes or packing wastes. The Environmental management Plan budget for proposed project is Rs. 100 Lakhs and recurring cost is Rs. 19 Lakhs per annum. Page 5 of 9 A.P.~ Po!lutifln Cortro! Boarff PLOT No, 41 , GURUi .. ;NAK RUAD •• KANAKADURGA OFFICER 'S COLO~ .IIAV"r:u"n" ("..,, -""• File No.APPC-INDOCR/3/2017 -EE(PCB)-APPCB(KRSN) The District Revenue Officer, Krishna District requested the public to express their concerns, opinion, suggestions, views etc. on the proposed project. 1. Sri Malaavath Venkateswar Naik, Jayanthi puram: He welcomed the industry in Jayanthipuratn village and opined that more industries should come in this area. 2. Sri lslavath SrinlJ, Janyanthipuram village: He supported the industry coming up in this village which will reduce the unemployment of the youth. He suggested tree plantation shall be taken up in the villages to reduce the pollution and it should be at the beginning of the construction of industry. 3. Sri V.Mallikarjuna Rao, Sarpanch, Jayanthipuram village: He welcomed the project and informed many more industries like this should come in this village which is the only solution of unemployment. 4. Sri Ch. Guravayya, Jayanthipuram village: He also supported the industry coming up in this area and informed that it would helpful to the youth for employment. He referred about the CSR Activities which should be spent in the surrounding villages only. He further informed that by establishing the industries the Panchayath also get beneficiated financially. He suggested that there shall not be any odour nuisance from the proposed industry and the villagers shall not get affected due to odour. 5. Sri Narikella Nagabhushana Rao, Jayanthipuram village: While welcoming the industry, he informed that employment should be given on priprity to local educated youth. The industry management should be helpful to the poor people of the village. 6. Sri I.Nageswara Rao, K.Agraharam: He also welcomed the industry coming up in this area. He also suggested to give priority to local villagers for employment and development activities for the surrounding villagers. Page 6 of 9 File No.APPC-INDOCR/3/2017 -EE(PCB)-APPCB(KRSN) 7. Sri Gundla Krishna Rao, K.Agraharam: - While welcoming the project, informed that employment on priority to local youth. Further he suggested that there shall not be any pollution problems in the surrounding vill.ages. 8. Sri Bandla Gynana Prakash Rao, Jayanthipuram village: While welcoming the project, he referred about the employment to the local educated youth. 9. Sri Kota Raja Rao, Jaggaiahpeta: He welcomed the CSR fund to be spent by the Managing Director. He suggested that spending of CSR fund should not be limited to Jayanthipuram village, it should be extended to Jaggaihpeta and other villages. Environmental conditions in Jaggaihpeta should be improved by taking up of tree plantation and their protection which would control the temperatures in Jaggaihpeta. 10.Sri Mullangi RamaKrishna Reddy, Sarpanch, Pochampally: He informed that the industries in this area are not extending any help to Pochampally village though it is existing very close to industries. He requested the industries to extend their help on par with the villages where the industries are located. The surrounding villages shall also be developed financially. While welcoming the project he suggested that if at all any pollution problems I damage to the villagers, the industry should be closed accordingly a GO should be issued by the Government. 11.Sri Sunandha Reddy, NGO: He welcomed the Project and supported for issuing of license. He suggested the following to be taken up by the Proponent. i. Rain water harvesting structure shall be constructed for raising of ground water table. ii. He welcomed the 36% of greenbelt as proposed by the proponent. He suggested that the greenbelt shall have medicinal plants and fruit bearing trees. Page 7 of 9 tOT "f>lo. 4 1. G ~ . ~,: .. •.r \:< R·l .' " ...,.,~~ ·~ ' ,. - .. . • ,..._ . :...J. File No.APPC-INDOCR/3/2017 -EE(PCB)-APPCB(KRSN) iii. The industry_management shall impart training to local youth for skill development. iv. Water, air and soil shall not be polluted in the surrounding villages. 12.Sri Y.Chenna Kesava Reddy, NGO, Hyderabad: ·while welcoming the project he suggested the following. i. Employment shall be given to local youth only . ii. CSR funds shall be spent to villages within 10 kms from the project site. iii. STP and water treatment plants shall be established. iv. Medical camps shall be taken up in the surrounding villages. 13.Sri Dhundigala Anjayya, NGO, Nalgonda: He welcomed the project and it would be helpful for giving employment to the ... , locals. He suggested that CSR funds shall be spent to the surrounding villages. 14.Sri Perika Krishnayya, NGO, Hyderabad: He supported the project and suggested that employment shall be given on priority to local youth and CSR fund shall be spent for local poor people. 15.Sri Vijaya Reddy, NGO, Hyderabad: He mentioned that the study on agricultural sector, animal husbandry, human life period was not ·carried out in EIA report. He suggested the above points shall also be included in EIA. Though the chemical industries adopted ZLD the pollution of Rivers are not stopped. He referred about the sustainable development and the industries should adopt the systems accordingly. He also referred about the release of pollutants like 802 and NOx in huge quanti!ies from the proposed industry which would affect the environment. He mentioned that the CSR fund allocated by the proponent is not covered under CSR GO. 16.Sri Lavanam Chandhra Shekar, NGO, Nalgonda: He welcomed the project and suggested that employment shall be given to local youth. Page 8 of 9 r-'1\.(.;'; i\G. 41 , GtiF<:,,.<."-~; ".:: ~~ ·· J ;,!..fi ~"·'"',.....'r,itf i ~-':;.;. or.f ;cc.H·s c· -·· · t\ u:'d..:JL:t~L.~~L.~=~- &2SJ rC.'!.l.: File No.APPC-INDOCR/3/2017 -EE(PCB)-APPCB(KRSN) The District Revenue Officer asked the Project Management to respond on the issues raised by the public. Sri K.V.Mahesh, Managing Director while inviting the public response on welcoming the project, stated that they would voluntarily allocate a fund of Rs.32 lakhs to spent under CSR. He assured that the local educated youth would be given preference in employment for local villages. Further they would extend their guidance I help to local youth for development of skills for employment. He was very much thankful to the public who attended the public hearing for the support of industry. The Environmental Engineer informed that 16 nos. of written representations received during the public hearing and the same were communicated to the Project proponent for their response. All the written representations along with the response of the project proponent would be tabulated and will be submitted along with minutes. The District Revenue Officer, While concluding the public hearing summed up the public opinion expressed and informed that the minutes recorded along with the response of the project proponent on the points raised shall be submitted to MOEF & CC, GOI for taking a decision. The Environmental Engineer, AP Pollution Control Board proposed vote of thanks for the Chair. District Revenue Officer & Additional District Magistrate Krishna Dist. lid ENVlROnMF:1f1Al F. c.;IN!D Page 9 of 9 A.P. Pollution Control BoarJ ftLOT No. 41, GURUNANM NOAD ... - .. ·-· • aKANAKADURG~ OFFtCER·s COLON' Fl JA7 AWA.D~ · S20 oo• r... ~0~<6U~ aqe~lb~~ , ;_; ' eJ._§; tn~~lS ..Ocii>o~D o.'i>o~~. , • ,iPoo crt> S"'Oll,.se>ai>o IOru~;;,~tj" I ,~ • ' ·• J' • ! I ! ' J { ~~ ' \,.. t \!.1 !NTl!IONMENTAL .I!NGIN!D ~~.cn:~um ~omlbUl A.P: P~lluti9n .. Control Boa·rfl ·' , e~.§. saw~ IOcWo~r.i ~o~o. .PLOT No: 41. GURUNANAK ROAD . .. . . ·e?al~ ~~~b'~pjcn)&Jll~ •• KANAKADURGA OFFICER'S COLONY FIIAY t4W~nA ~20 oo• ------~ 2._ ·- 1 2-- 'Lo-};= -- r . I Ut'{l/IO NMIWlAL ENUJNI.'Jf.JI \. P. Po!lulion CIJn:tol Board "1..01 No, 41, GURU/'IANr\1\ hUAD ''" IIA.NAKADURGA OFFICEfl ·$ COLON'f f"IJAYAWADA 'i20 m• GIST OF REPRESENTATIONS RECEIVED BEFORE AND DURING PUBLIC HEARING WITH PROPONENT RESPONSES Name and address of Response of the Project s. Gist of the Representations No the Persons Proponent We have entered in to a sale agreement with the land He asked about the land owners pertaining to ownership of proposed site and Sy.No:109 in an area of 2.93 Sri S. Srinivasa Rao, land conversion before project Acres on 15.09.2016. Ayyappa Nagar establishment. 2.00 Acres land was 1. Jaggaiahpet , Krishna He mentioned about existing purchased on 14/03/2017 and Dist pollution problems caused by 0.93 Acres was purchased on the existing industries in the 24/05/2017. surrounding areas. We assure you that we will take all necessary measures to avoid pollution problems. • The air of this area and surroundings within the radius ~We ensure that due to our of 5 kilometers already industry there will not be any polluted by the industries MCL air pollution to the surrounding Sri D.John Paul - Jayanthipuram, Amoda Iron area. We are taking necessary Social Engineer and Steel Industries and other steps to prevent air pollution. 2. Muktyala Road, cement industries of this area. • The emissions released from Jaggaiahpet , Krishna • Most of the villagers are process are neutralized in the Dist suffering from respiratory scrubber using caustic lye diseases which cause TB and solution and chilled water. other chest diseases, the Hence our industry will not infant babies are prone to create any pollution to the respiratory diseases like surrounding area. Astama, Bronchitis. •The generated liquid effluent • Ground water already got will be treated in stage wise in polluted due to the poor Zero Liquid Discharge system. maintenance of used mines by The treated water is used MCL - mines. again in the plant. • The dust released during • The particulate Matter/ Dust nights by the MCL, M/s. released from 3 TPH boiler will Jaypee Industries at pass through the cyclone Budavada damaging all crops separator and bag filters to Smt. Kota Indira thus affecting the cultivation reduce the emission levels. Williampeta, and farming community. •Our industry will not cause any 3. Jaggaiahpet , Krishna • Feeding grass/fodder diseases to the surrounding Dist becomes scarcity, the area people. Particulate domestic animals like goats Matter is well within the limits and sheeps, Buffalos, cows and gas em1ss1ons are unable to get good strengthy neutralized in the scrubber. green grass due to this • The generated gas emissions pollution as a result the are S02 & HCI are scrubbed in shepherds, gottary industry the scrubber to neutralize the become? same. Hence, no gas • The Skin diseases are emissions into air. spreading due to pollution, s. Name and address of Response of the Project Gist of the Representations No the Persons Proponent climatic conditions as a result the people in this area likely to prone skin cancers and other DermatologiGal diseases. • The monkey rehabilitation centre nearby this area severely affected by the harmful gasses and polluted water released by pharmaceutical companies were observed by the ground water and got polluted. Sri H. Madhubabu, He welcomed the establishment Thanked him for his support REEHAS, President, proposed project and given about project establishment. 4. Musheerabad, some suggestion to the project The possible suggestion given Hyderabad proponent. by him will be implemented. Sri V. Sunanda Reddy, He expressed his support for President, Dharithri the establishment of this Thanked him for his support Paryavarana industry in terms of local and we will 5. Parirakshana Samastha employment & development implement the possible , Shivaji Nagar, and gave few suggestions for suggestions. Nalgonda Disrict, Ecological balance. Telangana State. He welcomed the proposed project with some suggestions as mentioned below • Suggested some plant species for green belt development to mitigate air Thanked him for his support. Sri Thota Hussain emissions and odour We will develop the greenbelt Naidu BJP, problems. with native plant species to huzurnagar • Installation of ETP plant for mitigate air emissions and Constituency, 6. treatment and reuse of odour problems. Mellacheruvu (V & M), wastewater generated from We install ZLD system to treat Suryapet (Dt), plant. and reuse the generated Telangana State • Development of Green Belt to effluents. control Noise pollution and to maintain noise levels within the limits i.e 65 dB (A). • Infrastructure Development and employment generation within the surrounding areas. He welcomed the proposed project and given below mentioned Suggestions & References Thanked him for his support. Sri Y. Chenna Kesava • CSR fund to be allotted only We will allocate the CSR funds 7. Reddy, N.G.O to the effected villages. to the effected villages and we • Regular medical camps will develop avenue plantation. • Skill development • Employment to the locals. • CSR fund to be spent in the Response of the Project s. Name and address of Gist of the Representations No the Persons Proponent villages of 10 Km radius. • Installation of Effluent treatment Plant. • Road side plantation. He welcomed the proposed project with some suggestions as mentioned below • Control of Air pollution from the plant operations. • Waste water generated from Thanked him for his support. the plant operations to be We are going to erect ZLD treated in ZLD system and system to treat the generated prevent water pollution. effluents and to reuse the • He suggested that noise treated water. Sri Krishna Murthy, pollution will be controlled by We will dispose the 8. developing Green Belt and N.G.O, Hyderabad solid/hazardous waste as per providing acoustic enclosure the rules. to the DG Sets. We will develop greenbelt in • Proper management of Solid 36% of the total project area. waste to prevent soil pollution. • He suggested developing green belt to prevent pollution problems. • Employment to the locals. • CSR funds to be spent in the surrounding areas. He welcomed the proposed project and given below Thanked him for his support. Sri Y. M.N. Reddy, mentioned Suggestions & We will develop rainwater DANDA Kondamma References harvesting structures at nearby Charitable Trust, • Rainwater Harvesting villages and roof water T.Sunkesula ( V & P), 9. Structure to be developed. harvesting structures in the Yerraguntla Mandai, • 33 % Greenbelt to be plant area. . Y.S. R. District, Andhra developed. Maximum employment w1ll be Pradesh. • Skill development. given to the local people. • Employment to the Local people. He welcomed the project and stated that the establishment of new industries will helps in financial growth and Thanked him for his support. Sri Ravi Kumar development of the State. We will impart training Nandipati, He congratulated the project programmes and career Environment Volunteer management and the guidance programmes to the & Senior Journalist, consultant for their EIA report. 10. local un employed people. H.No. 6-197/24, Laxma He suggested the CSR fund We will provide career Reddy Palem, allocation to the below guidance to the youth for their hayatnagar, Hyderabad mentioned works. better job opportunities. • Special Skill training programmes to the local unemployed people. • Health camps in the local s. Name and address of Response of the Project Gist of the Representations No the Persons Proponent villages. • Green belt development to reduce noise pollution. They stated that their society has no objection for the establishment of the proposed Sri I Madhu and Sri B V project. Thanked him for his support. Reddy, He suggested the management We assured that maximum 11. Aashraya Rural to provide the local employment will be given to Development Society employment, allocation of CSR the local unemployed people. funds to the surrounding areas and development of green belt for protection of environment. He welcomed the project. He Sri S. Venkateswarulu , suggested that the project N.G.O authorities should take all the Thanked him for his support. Rastra Paryavarana Environment protection We will take all necessary Parirakshana Gramina measures to control pollution. measures to control the Vikasa Vedika, Take all necessary measures to pollution from plant operations. 12. H.No: 11-262, control the Air pollution and We will provide RO water Naidupeta Street, water pollution. plant for drinking water to the Mellachrvu-508246, Provide common infrastructure Jayanthipuram village and to Suryapeta District, measures like Drinking water, the villages near to the project. Telangana State Education and Health to the local villages. While welcoming the project he has given the below mentioned Sri S. V Krishna , suggestions to the project Thanked him for his support. N.G.O, Neethaa proponent. CSR funds will be spent to the Swachanda Seva • CSR fund to be allotted only effected villages. 13. Society, Sanjeeva to the effected villages. We assured that maximum Sadan, Abdulla Khan • Local employment to given by employment will be given to Estate, Kurnool providing skill development the local unemployed people. training. • Green belt development. He stated that he has no objection if the project gets Sri Lavanam Chandra approval for the establishment. Sekhar, President, Sri If the project gets approved Thanked him for his support. Vamshi Arts Academy, unemployment problem will be We will allocate the CSR funds 14. H.No:5-48, Meruwada, solved. CSR funds will be spent to the effected villages and we Ramannapet, in the local villages for will develop avenue plantation. Nalgonda District, development. Telangana State Green belt should be developed. They requested the MoEF & CC Thanked him for his support. Environmental Control to grant approval to the Industry We assured that maximum Organization for Anti on behalf of their organisation. 15. employment will be given to Pollution (ECOFAP) Suggested the project the local unemployed people. (NGO) authorities to provide employment to the local people. 16. Sri Chepuri Raju, State He welcomed the project and Thanked him for his support. Name and address of Response of the Project s. Gist of the Representations No the Persons Proponent Secretary, Telangana asked project proponent, to We assured that maximum State, Dalitha Bahujana provide employment to the local employment will be given to Party, Flat No. 303, 3'd unemployed people, control the local unemployed people. Floor, Mogal Apartment, water pollution and protect We will take all necessary Deccan Towers, animals & Birds from pollution. measures to control the Basheerbagh, pollution. Hyderabad. Thanked him for his He submitted a representation suggestions and we will Sri Cherukuri Venu 17. having a set of suggestions incorporate the possible Gopal ,FFAAP about the proposed project. modifications with the final EIA report. He welcomed the establishment Sri A. Sudarshan, of the proposed project. He Director, Cheyutha asked to spend the CSR funds Rural Development Thanked him for his support. to the education and Health 18. Society , We will develop 36 % green purpose, employment to the Door No: 1-191 , Gandhi belt within the plant premises. local people, follow the MoEF & Nagar, Wadapally, CC rules and Regulations and Damaracherla Mandai, Develop 30 % green belt. While welcoming the project he asked the project proponent, to Thanked him for his support. Sri Govindu Kumara provide employment to the local We will provide employmentto Swamy, President, Sri 19. unemployed people, to Develop the local people. Rama Goo Green Belt, to control water Greenbelt will be developed in Samrakshana Shala pollution and protect animals & an area of 1.08 Acres. Birds from pollution. Thanked him for his support. He welcomed the project. Sri Sanku Sreenivasulu, We will provide maximum Asked the Project proponent to Sate General employment to the local provide employment to the local Secretary, people. people, provide common D.No: 4-54, Near RO water plants will be 20. infrastructure measures like Central Bank of India, established in the Drinking water, Education and Vikas Nagar, Jayanthipuram village and Health to the local villages. Dilsukhnagar, other nearby villages to Provide Drinking water facility to Hyderabad-500060 provide drinking water facilities the local villages. to the villagers. They welcomed the project and suggested not to affect the Sri P. Krishnaiah, surrounding villages and people Paryavarana Thanked him for his support. by their production operations Parirakshana Samithi, We will take all necessary and also they have to follow NGO, Office:9-7/1, measures to control the 21 . central pollution rules and Road No:? A, pollution and we will follow the guidelines. Dwarakapuram, relevant rules and guidelines. They stated that they are Dilsukhnagar, supporting on behalf .,of NGO Hydera9.ad members to give permission to the project. BARATIYA JANATA.PARTY HUZURNAGAR CONSTITUENCY Cell : 8247539242 : 966623341 0 A.M.I.E., M.B.A, ~tOtuOf! :>.>16~ ~:J:>.>e ~.e.516n5 ~e~:Jt~~ ~:J«>,st>S · DoJ: e - I 9 - J ~- l-1 1 '6~~d.s e>t.:'~~ ~v ~tS !J~I65 . ~6® ~,.stltS~. 1116.>~, r;1Jar1Q evav ~Otl~ c(:,o~ ~'0/6 L N ~ 0 \ <\ & 3 .) tD ~ ~ - ~vJ .;p ~:S~v ~ . ~~_J{ ~J~~Vtl ~~Pm>~ ~voM - ~o21}£8 7\08 c::.__ crt) rf) oJ • 0 . ~ . ~ ~ odu @u.J _-: •• _ a:r1 J\~ - 1 .._- »-- o 11 <> ~ -~<><;,0 \) 1; ?J' ~ - ?.'! ~ <:Jduj i', ,~,_; !llJ, , 0 . ; 8:1 o6J o tl ~ 6 o (~ i>u ~" ~ < 2;1 a f ( -tro c6 cl b1JJ ~ ~ e- ~ ;· ~ ~ 0 0 c~ y,__s-D ~ (;;J-o {) 0 J ~ s 6 .e: .. ~ IW o'u ---00 ~,_:) J D) fu). ~ - o_zy _~ o: __c;,et~~.,_, "trf)-;~,.0:, ~lt(~.»J{' c; ""'';;,.J~ ~ J-.ih~J '~ ' _ ·. · _ ~~taG> llJ 6Jil:l ~vo • (W £v o coS~ v ~ u-.<.W"" sJO 'irD 00,0 SD 0J ~ -";, ":,; .iJ v c~ t.J cB ~ ~_,-;:., :N adO""-'-'~ 'lid ;J o -.£ wn ro>S~ ll ~ 0 4 . · · __ ~-so -6 :s .6J:> 0:, ,o,., ;') e>50 0 c Yo ;,s,nk SJ · · <".!!>ll>Jcv'-"'d~ £:;:, C3J i>:J% C~t) 1JQ:<> cq -£~~::..> <:'7 t::J .:>,s-a%"" &>:so . ru-&J 6., o-.£ (;, ;';oJ tJ ., ~ <»0 ('>j:)J . ~ o.>.l <;:>oo 4 ~ 6 ~ ~ -·-. - --- .. - BARATIYA JANATA.PARTY HUZURNAGAR CONSTITUENCY ,, Cell : 8247539242 : 966623341 0 . A.M.J.E., M.B.A, t)...Ke_ ' q - \ 'L- \i-1 ~(()tl,)~ ll>l6tlf5 d:lll3 ~2:)9l5t6r1l5 !Od:Ut~tl~ l1~l6l5 go~~~ e>Q«>'Q* ~e> ~t) l1'zt66 . · · ~~ om.,.st~t)~. r1(6)u), ~rsg evav t>e>~tra oo~ ~~ ( N c; o \ q "« :?:. ) , .. .· 8:1e;'S'D e.J ~ () . . ~ .., I . . . "0 0 - :; o •• - ;;;, &d .fu G ~..J {!> ~ @o Oju !1>-u~ ~ ~ ti:l o -i:J <::;0 00"!)} go t;:;;.J }lj e.>~ (_50 41J':5 ~J £ -6J) £ ~ -4 ~ 05J 6l~ ~ov 6 e_, =.J' 1nJ ( Wo.tnT-.at M e-t" P ICll>.l- 1 4->% _,.g:, ;;, L~ ~ ..p . .J .-L.. ~ ..~.. , 'b.J o l/S.J e.v ~ J (l)v b o ~ 6 ~ · ~ o5 ;:J -6 ~oce.v - (iV1) cr f% -oJ ~ t>WV ev 0 . ·i.J axm ~ o"'C-6'0 v6v (~j.:3$l)eJ~o) -€:,ei~Qbivsv~fr~~~~~ dJb-~"OD · . . . h . t"""' ..4.,....-n ,._ r Do I' 2uJ/1) ~0 . <§'~ ~a~~ 0 Odvo Ce5 ;6.:>J~ ~J' ~ ,eo.J -~v v..., \:1 "') ',::) '---- ...J 8U o u9 o:>'"" o ~ -r>UIW ~ i ei c.;;., W 4 J'.9- "'YO eu .i{_p o (j.Q t.J. ~ o6wo C ~ ~~l.) • -:o·.- ~8c~cfJJ~ . ¥60 ~~vev covo~c3vnRo"""(l)~ (D6JGW ·e, ~ "§ 6:) w- ~ s t) 6~00) ~ c60 eJ s ~ 10 5>J~ ctJ £lb . -vJ . . . I . ~ sne.o~o~duf,J~o~ . >t~ f)@:, "'f · ~ ...fhl ~ !J lY ~ o c_i, 'i6w~ ~.; ~ 6 Q__<}o-w~ ~ru · ~:J-s (f\0~ ~-ro,J1@6~ · -.~o~~ ~ec~~o ~v~ (r:;ob.J~~~v ~o(J66 .· . . ~ ~ tf DS~t5 . ~ do"h.J ~o C) £ 'eJ ~J' d:>~- LS~ "Orb~vru , ~ ~ _r ~ ~ ~ _ -s ~.j~~ ~~ ;-;-vv-2~ KoJ 7!J ~ saV s J @; ~J' (, 6?~ ~ .~ · cw ttiv o E:) • ~ ~ ~pa~m~uo~ \1{)}] ·BARATIYAJANATA.PARTY ~....,~~l6r1~ ~re~cf>~o y . HUZURNAGAR CONSTITUENCY Cib't1~~ {J;J01>o & 01>0., ~f>t> es~. avonara Cell : 8247539242 : 966623341 0 A.M.I.E., M.B.A, l)<:J.-~ - lq_-\2.-l/ . ~l()tu~ ::ulO~ JJ:ll~ ~~l0115 ~e~Jl()R JJ~l()~ 9~ f!lt;!~~ ~v ~0 g~l()l5 ~ ;:)oe,sl()~. ~w. ~Mg evav ~e>Otra oo~ ~~ ( N t; o 1 q & "1..) ~ Q..y c-:g-o@ ~ (J_5bj'\ ~:Wi Qj\l"'t} ~ 2lv.1J tf:JvJ tvec_~ ~ ~75ooo e~2t'qSw 1. a cnA9~ w I ~ run~ om f) aS 1)0 J' m-6 (:}> ( ~ ?J1) 2p c~ o::U 1 s ~ e;d J ~o0-o£,~~ -.;£ {)6u:rr.6J ~.sf) ~ (\ ~ fJ e;$J :6J ~V 11,0 €J 'f/ O<.JV V~ ~~~ ~ - ~ (_~ eiv ~ :6J ~n ~ - SJ~~g c r c ~tll~6 4ry.J'~~s ~0\.~JWi~Oftle~- ~J) ¢~ ~cit 7 ~ ;;Yn £rlJ ~ c»J crt .f6 c f' c. ~ t .-cp ~~OJ.) n-o ~.tr . =~) -£~£ 8 Cl?~ (ea~ J 'A£_ ~j ~~ rco8tr :tt) ~ ~uo'l.J~"1v~-:S~g ~o(9t~i{~"SO~~ tDoSuo(~~:Oualtt.~l')tJDtr !> J ~ -sJ ~ 'M ~ ~ ~ ~% (\()ttv- . 1)~ ~.9JIObf~oM ~o~fi!g ~* ~~7\Detr . ciJo o\A1 ~ Q"tl£DO ~ ~ ~ ol0 C. 2;o ~ [i). ;' I - ---· ------I t .,.,' 10 ~t_.'Lei~~ ~. 0- ~m_ - p.,Q>Cb \" '?'~~ ~ :;:-:;, (;, "-' -,)..<)_--=of' 4 -""'~/.-> """-"" 's SO \i'>~ N· 'C · 0-~~ _,.,~,;-'-""=" ""-"'~ \_~.s~~ \1"'- L-'0 ~ '<'"'-I'~~~~~ "-~--"<_-...n·\o'l, -:Y>-"-~s \NO")'\:::' 1 :s ""'Ci "\l""""--" r--<>~-- '- "'1 ~ """"'~'9-<;:) "" (l, -/., ,;>?.J. ~(£., so sxf (i) :2- ~~ ~E,.<,'-"'>~ ~ r ~'>'2-J"t.3> R ~ y C3J ~ "'"'"'S\0 ~"(' ~~.s'2"-"'"""'S"' CJ) I o ~ - ~ «~ uC ~ v uC :S. C. S <'-. 'l> §::,~'::'8 \.9 ~ ~~,-c)~~ \\--~ ~()M) £1 i.d ~'I'Q,S'oQ) 0 ~ ,;;.:, S ~ "'() ~ ()sq,&:> '\l'l ~ e e;.~~~ s.-,2V-2'-"' '--" ~s~ '--(' :;::;-~ ~ C\~9\ ~~3a( f DANDA KONDAMMA CHARTABLE TRUST T. SUNKESULA (VILLAGE & POST), YERRAGUNTLA MANDAL, Y.S.R. DISTRICT K~DAPA, . . . . . CORRESPONDENi\ RESIDENCE ADDRESS : . H NQ : 5-6•329/1, SWAPNA MADHAVI ARACADE VAIDEHI~AGAR, ' VAN~'];~~U~URAM, Mf!:~AR£DOY !liST HY;D:'-500070 CELL N.O-; 9.4918830i!l9 REG NO : BOOK IV NO : 06/2011 ------~--~~------~--~·----~------~t1:0 -- . - .,.._ - · ~z.z:c.~J . R - C)~~ ~~~ \\ < ~- . • ~""" ,;v) ' ~c._ ~,.;._ p ~. ~ :l_ - \ :>_ . 2.<::> 17 """' (> "'0:' ... ---··-·------·---- -~ ~~ ~ &_s ~f)0~~ ~\si-J~ "-3 -AJ() 'f"" 0~~ cV C L ._)Sf~~~ . ~~ '¥-'V ~ GJJ::f ~'0\ L\0 ?~~ ~~' . S Su~ ~-·...J~_s-<:::Ju '_- · ~ss=c~·"'• ~ :?<0)~ 9-o ~~~f\O~ ~~~~ ~ - . -. - :_J· 3 EV ?:>3I ,S''v-O GiL 99 'o 21 ( 7- (J.l- -- --"f"':.._ ___ ------·· ------01.18.12.2017 From To; Ravi Kumar Nandipati, The Regional Officer, Environment Volunteer & Senior Journalist AndhraPradesh Pollution Control Board, 6-197/24, Laxma reddy Palem, Vijayawada. Hayat Nagar, Hyderabad AndhraPradesh State Cell: 08§787 42750 Mail: [email protected]. Sub : Welcoming _ the. " Stiarvani · Labs Pvt Limt " Jayanthipuram Village, Jaggayapet (M), Krishna Dist. AndhraPradesh State. Ref : Environmental public hearing meeting on 22.12.2017. Sir, Nandipati Ravikumar Environment Volunteer & · Senior Journalist, welcoming . . . " Sharvani Labs Pvt Limt " Jayanthipuram Village, Jaggayapet _ (M), Krishna Dist. AndhraPradesh state government is supporting new and upcoming industries, and giving so many incentives, and also setup special industrial complex es it helps the "AndhraPradesh State Government Financial growth". In AndhraPradesh, with this project local area unemployed youth get job appuratunites and it helps State financial growth with the help of a-nd duties. We congratulate the management and the consultant for their EIA report. We are recommending some works with help of community social responsibility funds. 1. Special skills training programmes for local un-employment youth. 2. Special health campus for rural villages. 3. Take much care about Greenbelt, it helps reducing the noise pollution Hence we are request to take necessary steps to sanction central Govt. Environment, forest, weather change department permissions. Thanking you Sir, Yours faithf~ll~ oJ'~~ ( RAVIKUMAR NANDIPATI ) , /AASHRAYA RURAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIIETY -.,. KAMBADUR - ANANT APUR Dist. (_~ - ~) Regd. No. 638/2004 ~- 5)..,:?)) 2- J.fl (!f} (578 .i),4pJ'---U ~ ~. -£, - J;::: f zJ/ I u fi oV) CD 'Y116oL G,dXl~ ~CJio~ D~- ce...- - q;r;- 7~'-f~WAd74 ~ ~ ~ ~ l>-t> -u:> ~ c3v\...) ~ ~ . ·-;;:>' 6V ~~ I ..9-~t?LVO~ _ ~-v:zs>S ~ ey ~ ~ \) Q.JL, \ ~-ED s, -JU o - \0CJ ~ ~~o_g.~o _ ~ C::V~ a_Y>8J~~ !?KJ~T \J~{!_~~b~ ~u~~~ c_f;~o ~e~~ - ~~ ~30 _g~ SJ ..'3 ~~S ·~su ~ ~ · ~~~rS · dJ - - ~c-0?"' - ~£ ~ (Z:y)~ ,q=l .s/C::>U ~ r-JO ~ 1 o~ ~ !-J'd£_ qz_r-::3.-b-~~~~~~ a$c.U8c-~ ;;:v r0 -iW ~ ~ ~ _:))) -€, )Sir SJ ~ ~~ ;:; ~ ~~ ~ ~o ~ - 4 c) JLSU-o [d) cbf;SC)cP t:o ~- ;;)tY- o ')___Jt) ::V ,s- 0 ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~' ~~ - ~~ _j~hu - g.~ c~-l-"'o $"1-s- 66£3i- Address for Communication: 12-3-272 6th Cross, Sai Nagar, ANANTAPUR _ 515001. (f) 223665 ~Q";s~~~OO.) ~g; 9010989313 . ~~~.:::TI...J -L (") ~'\--~ Q ~k ' ~ 'ti',:S~(:)~"l'i~6 ~ '"IE:)=..)~~"j :s~ ~OJ(~~~, ~c~- ~ ~~~C)~~ c:J~(rysa-cE 0Jr0J 1 6:Dc~ ~:- . . ) 8:,~ 22_-)2._- L-o\/ r::>JLW ~~~~ ~~ . :=:fril ~o ~ ~~() es--~ '2;j3,~ M!s ~B . ~,-) ~~¢; ci5\9.~ ~~a - \"3 \", ~ ses>c:PuS ~s ~~~. ~~ ~ ~'0~ ~ · ~r V)ef6-c~& ~ ~aeJ8~WJ~ ~ ~~ ~p5) ~~.(§J~V?~~6~J - ~~Jln~ ~~ c.:)] ~--GS0c~~- ~ . I'-'\ ~~6-ro ~0~~~~ N"G\o . ~~ - ~ . ;-~~~) ~ CC3~ ------·---·------~------_--...J• fllJETJIAAswACHANDA SEVA SOCIETY (ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DEVOLOPMENT ORGANIZATION) # 40/321-6-A1, SANJEEVA SADAN, ABDULLAH KHAN ESTATE, KURNOOL-518 001, AP. Chief Functionary: S.VENKATESHWARLU. PH: 92 92 50 §3 50 10, It;_ -,;.LC-~ v ~ e"" J1'Y1<<-V, {~ · C. . B . l"'- ~ d "-""av~ ~ M) ~ - --~-'~~~ j b-666 6 2..-l..)b. -'N.&,ZJ AIR POLLUTION. NOISE POLLUTION. SOLID WASTE. LIQUID EFFLUENTS. ------· ------· -~~- Queries and Comments on EIA for Sarvani Labs Pvt Ltd, Jayanthipuram Mls_Sarvani Labs are proposing a new pharmaceuticals plant near Janthipuram, Krishna district. Draft REIA is prepared by Rightsource Industrial Solutions Pvt Ltd, Hyderabad. As usual this EIA also has several shortcomings and errors including copy-paste. It is unfortunate that our regulatory system is incapable of checking unethical practices and improve the quality of the EIA reports. Public hearing is scheduled on 22 December 2017 at the plant premises. I am listing below some mistakes and manipulations of data while preparing the draft EIA report. Based on these observations a list of questions are raised for reply by the proponent in writing. 1. Coal: Coal consumption of 7.5 TPD for a 3 TPH steam boiler is absurd. For Indian coal with 47% ash content coal required for 1 TPH boiler is about 4 .8 TPD. So the coal requirement should be 4.8 x 3 = 14.4 TPD. 2. Emissions: Data given in table 2-10 is used as basis Sulphur Dioxide: Boiler capacity : 3.0 TPH Coal consumption : 7.5 TPD Sulphur Content of coal (%) : 0.5 Sulphur dioxide generated : 7.5 x 1000 x 0.5 I 100 x 64132 x 1124 x 1000 I 3600 : 751(24 x3.6) = 0.868 gls Diameter of the stack :0.5 m Cross sectional Area of stack : 3.14 x 0.52/4 = 0.19625 m2 Flue gas velocity in the stack : 16 mls Volumetric flow of flue gas :0.19625 x 16 = 3.14 m'ls Temperature of flue gas : 180 C = 273 + 180 = 453 K Flue gas flow rate at STP : 3.14 x 273 I 453 = 1.89 m'ls Sulphur dioxide in flue gas : 1.89 m '/s x 110 mg/Nm' x 1/1000 g/mg = 0.208 g/s Based on proper estimate of coal consumption of 14.4 TPD Sulphur dioxide generated 14.4 X 1000 X 0.5 I 100 X 64/32 X 1/24 X (1000/3600-} ~44/(24 X 3.6) : 1.667 g/s Sulphur dioxide rate in flue gas taken is 1.2 g/s (Table 2-10). How this number is arrived at is unknown. It is 28% less than the probable emission rate. The emission concentrations of S02 and NOx taken to calculate the emission rate of these gases from the stack have no basis. Calculating the flue gas flow rate based on an assumed stack gas velocity is wrong. Flue gas flow rate should be arrived at from combustion calculations for coal. Concentrations of S02 and NOx taken as 110 mg/Nm' and 120 mg/Nm' as shown in Table 2.10 (Page 44) cannot be attained without incorporating processes such as FGD and SCR for removal of these gases. Solvent Loss: "The industry will take measures for reduction of fugitive emissions by providing Chilled brine circulation to the condensers, which ensures the recovery of 95% and also controlled by closed operations and handling methods." (Page 230) "The above management will results in recovery of solvent more than or equal to 9s:o7o1." (Page 260) But the loss shown in material balances presented _in chapter 2 and others is a uniform 2% for all solvents. This is false. Losses of acetone and Toluene· cannot be same as their volatilities vary widely. Jimmy Peress, "Estimate storage tank emissions" Chemical Engineering Progress, p44-45, Aug 2001 presents method of estimation of solvent losses from storage tanks and presents the results for several solvents at ambient temperature. From the data below it is clear that the extent of loss of solvents differ widely. There are printing errors in the Notes below the table. Temperatures within the brackets are C and not F. These losses are at temperature less than 13 C. But at the plant site the temperatures could be as high as 40 C or more in summer. T•hle Comp:uison of shorlcut procedure and EPA methotl '·~ i'· ft~~~~·rcll ~{1ltf'',~v:;~ ' r,, EPA Method bisr::"r!!p rmcy ~w--.~-i.-y--.-s-,.-.-,h-in-y-;-,-.,-.l----+-w-.-,k-in-y--r-B-,.-.,-hir-,y--rT-.-..~ 1 --~--w-.r-ki-ny--~e-,.-.,-~~i-ny--r-T-ot-•1--~- ~ loues, lh/yr losses. lb/yr loues. lh/yr l oues, lblyr losses. lh/yr Lones. lblyr losses losse~ lo~'es 4 :>-,-o-lu•-.n-e ~--,--,....,.--t-_.,..,~,.,. ".9'~-- -~ 319.7 -. .... -, ·-;;;-.~6 ~-- ~ ~~:~ - ~-~ ---;;;;-;;-~~- .!3.; ·~ ·: ~ - a~~ ------~:· - ~ ,. i47,1 85.1 232.2 14i:z 71i~i 217.9 -•.or. -9 . 9~~ -6.2% -~ ~ ~-- .,, ,._; i. ·,r .. . ' .. _, '"'-1 · .. ·...... '-\·• : Methanol 915.9 4 13.8 1,329.7 885.4 .a to i.36G.4' ~33o/o •16.2% +2.8% J · -:-~ ·· ·t·-r. -· ' ,;, ~; ·. r , Cume ne iit.9 65.5 177.4 107.1···. 58.i 165.3 -4_j~, - 11.1 % --6.8% 1 .... \··~'l~~l ~ .. ~- ...... ·' ~ Acelona 3,kl.7 l,:jjo,3 4,71J'Z.O 3.300.4 i.S15 7 5,186.1 ... 2.4,; •J6.4r. +8.5% J .- 't:' ~.-t'!t·~-- '· ·_. •' ··' o · Dichlorobentene 42.3 25.1 67 .4 40.4 22.0 62.4 ..... !;,, - 12.4% - 7.4% J Notes: 1. Storage tank is 40ft high x 20ft dia., and on average is half fulL 2. Total annual throughput is 939,967 gal/yr (125,664 ft3/yrl. 3. Daily ayerage temperature is 54.55.F (12.53' F). 4. Daily average temperature range is 15.3'F (8SF). Solvent losses have an impact on occupational exposure to workers in terms of workroom concentrations in the plant ~ Draft REIA report has not presented any data on occupational exposure from workroom concentrations. Especially thionyl chloride has a STEL value of 1 ppm. Means exposure at l ppm for 15 minutes could be fatal. 3. Chemical Exposure Limits: Chemical Exposure Limit values presented in Table 7.7 Page 193 are outdated and far above the actual limits. Data collected from authentic sources is presented to show the errors. Chemical Data Presented in Table 7. 7 ACGIH 2005 ACGIH TLV OSHA NIOSH IDLH ACGIH TLV OSHA PEL NIOSH PEL IDLH" Acetic s s 1000 s s 200 Anhydride Acetone ?SO 1000 20000 2SO 1000 2SOO Carbon 10 20 SOD 1 20 SOD disulphide Chlorine 1 1 10 o.s ·r 10 Ethyl 400 400 10000 400 400 2000 Acetate Iodine 0.1 0.1 2 0.01 0.1 2 Methanol 200 200 6000 200 200 6000 Methylene so soo sooo so 2s· 2300 Chloride Monochloro 10 75 2400 10 75 1000 benzene$ Nitric Acid 2 2 100 2 2 25 Phosphorous 25 25 Trichloride Toluene 2000 500 Ceiling Limit Value @ NIOSH Pocket Guide 2007 # · California OSHA PEL - Latest data on OSHA website does not give any PEL values for MDC. https://www.osha.gov/dsg/annotated-pels/tablez-2.html $ MCB is a class 2B carcinogen OSHA: PELs are outdated as they are not being updated. NIOSH: "no detectable exposure levels for proven carcinogenic substances" 4. Air Quality: Only two sources of pollution are considered for air quality det~rioration. One is the 3 TPH boiler and the other 320 KVA generator. From the evidence presented in sections 1 & 2 above, it is clear that the quantity of pollutants is much below ttie actual and erroneous. Air quality change predicted from false data cannot present the correct impacts. Annexure-11 . l .. y.l"!fhii'!Jnr.l Vlo:~t!11f H_., .. _ s."o ... 50•h'i1 / '"' N0.(1'9/m) j)hfJ!;,.·~- .• RC"(Vft)( f'.:II"RII J) ·~- ...... , H/JlfuaJ nll (O(I:L-.f , .. ·a:..' ) ,..,m .ls: - u 11 -u :u. 0 .z4 hrs ""'"'>2.) 104 lU n•.l ,.. 114 l:H "·t .., Z1 ... ;:: U.oJ.lOIJ. 71 )1.2 II·~. ll.J "' Jj') U .ll 700 1.1 '" 12.] Ll ,,,J IH .,.. Jl·ON!JH ...... "- .... 1004. .u o.r.-~- =t= "ltH l1·11).l01 .. 22.2 "-' H-2 IH "·' 11.4 "' l~l.l/JU4 "' l~ ... zo.t "' "' ll Dr' "· "- ·"" '" 2: 1 1'1~ 14 .. ,,'"' .u .e '" l1 :=;:= .l·U~J-4 U.l 11.7 ., "- l4·ll-:!CH ,_. Ill) ... ll ]5.3 IJ.} ,., 11 0 Ol..Qf..JOIJ w 21.2 ...... _JL_ OJI.t!J.a911 .." 14.2 ,.. IU lll ,,,"' ..... __JJ_ 62 '" 10.7 18.1 "' 18.7 3: lliL'lllU ...... ;L_ -.- 11.] u . .,, ,.,..,. 14!10CU "' '·" ... " -- m lT6 _ll_ 20!1;:'Gl5 1 . .ll.7 .> Above air quality data is from the EIA report for VBC Fertilizers and Chemicals measured during December 2014 - February 2015 at jayanthipuram. Sarvani labs is adjacent to VBC project site. This project obtained EC from MoEF and is in the pipeline. In such cases the EIA for Sarvani Labs should include proposed emissions from this plant also and all other plants that are in progress to come out with a cumulative impact assessment. It is another matter that VBC produced all false data for emissions and yet managed to get EC based on a copy pasted EIA report. TABLE 3.12: AMBIENT AIR QUALITY, STATION: JAYANTHIPURAM (A5) Date Week PM 10 PM 2.5 so2 NOx co NH3 voc 06.03.2017 1 55.29 21.34 11.34 15.24 0.42 12.94 BDL 07.03.2017 1 54.61 20.68 11 .29 15.37 0.48 13.64 BDL 13.03.2017 2 55.oa 21.09 10.35 15.29 0.39 14.09 BDL 14.03.2017 2 54.91 22.37 10.57 14.07 0 .37 15.27 BDL 20.03.2017 3 55.03 22.91 11 .06 15.38 0.50 14 .83 BDL 21 :03.2017 3 55.67 21.58 11 .38 15.6 0.42 14.67 BDL 26.03.2017 4 56.81 21 .3 10.94 14.92 0.48 15.08 BDL 27.03.2017 4 57.03 21.64 10.58 14.51 0 .51 15.34 BDL 03.04.2017 5 56.91 22.14 11.49 15.35 0.48 16.01 ' BDL 04.04.2017 5 57.04 22.08 11 .08 15.62 0.43 15.84 BDL 10.04.2017 6 57.38 21.67 11.34 14.98 0.47 15.27 BDL 11.04.2017 6 56.19 22.06 10.69 15.06 0 .42 15.83 BDL 17.04.2017 7 56.82 23.54 10.48 15.27 0.51 14.98 BDL 18.04.2017 7 56.37 22.59 10.54 14.92 0.38 14.76 BDL 24.04.2017 8 55.99 24.16 11 .37 15.04 0 .39 15.04 BDL 25.04.2017 8 56.28 23.51 11 .06 14.68 0.42 14.28 BDL 02.05.2017 9 55.49 22.41 11 .59 15.73 0 .41 14.37 BDL 03.05.2017 9 57.34 22.81 11 .08 15.28 0.38 15.06 BDL 08.05.2017 10 56.60 23.30 11 .50 14.60 0 .55 14.50 BDL 09.05.2017 10 57.90 24.50 12.30 15.30 0.41 15.30 BDL 12.05.2017 11 58.30 21.60 11 .70 16.50 0 .52 14.90 BDL 13.05.2017 11 59.10 22.80 12.50 15.80 0.48 15.60 BDL 18.05.2017 12 58.80 23.60 13.10 17.40 0 .39 16.20 BDL 19.05.2017 12 56.10 24.10 12.00 16.60 0.42 15.80 BDL Minimum 54.61 20.68 10.35 14.07 0.37 12.94 0.00 Maximum 59.10 24.50 13.10 17.40 0.55 16.20 0.00 Average 56.54 22.49 11.31 15.35 0.44 14.98 0.00 981 Percentile 58.96 24.34 12.82 17.03 0.54 16.11 0.00 It may be noted that concentrations of pollutants are higher in winter months compared to summer due to changes in mixing heights with season. The air quality for each of the pollutants measured in summer of 2017 are close to concentrations measured in winter of 2014-15. If the ground level incremental concentrations are calculated including the emissions from the VBC plant also then NAAQS will be exceeded. Incremental GLCs computed for VBC with heavily manipulated emission rates gave considerable incremental values. The table with those values from their EIA is reproduced below. Table 4 .3 Overall Scenario of GLCs predictions 3 Maximum Incremental Levels ( - g/m ) Descri ption NO, PM so2 .5 . 18 Predicted maximum GLCs volues 6.68 24.2 rvlaximum concentrotions observed during 2 1.60 71 .00 "15.50 Boseline study 32.42 Resultant concentrations 73.41 62.4 One can clearly notice the error in calculation of resultant concentrations. Simple additions are not done properly. The consultants get away with any nonsense becaus_e the regulatory system is sick Once the VBC plant comes on stream, the air quality in the area could exceed NAAQS to begin with in winter and then throughout the year. Questions: 1. AP state is building a new capi~al Amaravathi downstream of the industrial hub near Jaggayyapeta. All the effluents from the industries are likely to end up in Krishna River and impact drinking water quality for the people of the capital city and other cities nearby. It is a repetition of the mistake committed in Hyderabad. Fate of Musi and other water bodies is well known. ZLD has proven to be a tool to beat regulation and has not eliminated pollution. ZLD being very expensive it cuts into the profits of the company. ZLDs are complex systems and their operation is difficlllt and takes intensive attention. With lax and incompetent regulation groundwater everywhere the pharma industries are located has been poisoned. Who is designing and supplying the ZLD system? What is their expertise in this field? 2. Proponent to give details on how they calculated the Indian coal requirement for a 3 TPH boiler and arrived at 7.5 TPD? 3. ~ive details on obtaining concentration values of 110 mg/Nm' for SO, and 120 mg/Nm' for NO, in the stack gas. 4. As demonstrated in section 2 above the emission rates for SO, are incorrect. Proponent to provide details of calculations for emission rates of SO, and NO. and reproduce the numbers given in Table 2.10. 5. What is the validity of incremental GLC values obtained from air quality modeling when the inputs for pollutant flow rates are erroneous? 6. Fugitive emissions from the storages and process operations are not quantified and presented. Losses of solvents shown in Chapter 2 are mere assumptions that have no basis. What are the actual losses for all the solvents? And where do they end up? 7. There is hardly any EIA report that has no copy paste content from other 1 sources. This ' report too has considerable plagiarism. How does the I proponent justify unethical practices in preparing documents whose quality has consequences on the people? For example entire section 4.1 Introduction is copy pasted from other reports. 8 .. Groundwater is proposed for all uses in the plant with the claim that there is adequate quantity. Groundwater quality at the project site is not presented in the EIA. GW1 in Table 3.16 is shown as at a distance of 5.2 km from the project site. How does a sample taken at a distance of 5. 2 km from the site represent the groundwater quality at the project site? This sample has 560 mg/1 ofTDS. - ~~~~~ Dr K Babu Rao Chief Scientist (Retd) ~Cc~D2-0 ~~ ~~ H No 4-1-50/2, Road No 3 Snehapuri Colony Hyderabad 500076 ;vM--A ?- I' .! !' :' .·J Ph : 08694-:251423, Cell :9949447376. ·--< "'SRI VAMSHI ARTS ACADEMY SOCIAL VOLUNTARY ORGANISATION H.No. 5-48, Meruwada, RAMANNAPET- 508113, Dist: Nalgonda. (A.P.) Govt. Regd. No. 3575/95. ~f: · 'lJate :.~-- ~~-.::7:;?."9.J? ~oSl.D€2 nL.,-J\1RdL. 43,ort:D ~/~ oF2P·t c__B Y;:J ~IJ -tJ-e-D liJ ~ ;:S ~?l?suf)o 73- ~ ~ :; Sb-Af\.0 ( . v ~~o~ -?CPs;:;- GUD~ ~- -~2f ~ - ~~~~-~ -Losr~ ~su~~Jb ~~ ~ .(:;5-c.-9---~ ~~@__~~ ~~1)~ e:;; ,Sr.? 9- ::;; e-w 50 ;3? ::.s .s-3U 0 ;:so .;5be-9- ~~6.3-- :;£,£??) ~$:.9. --=~~~~~ v~~--\~Qc~ f'RESID T Sri Vamshi Arts AcademY ••H•amanoapet-508 ]!3, Ditt; N I\< ------~ , Rogd. No.1960-Z016 l'... :. . ' Regd. Nool96o-zol6 Off1ce: H.No.7-134/2, Sri Nagar Colony, (Vi):Kunloor, (M):Abdullapurmet, R.R.Dist. RINGU RAMBABU 0 t . 2:J--:- \ J._- ff- State President a e ...... , Cell:9666987484 ~~- ~6~~~raE /_)~~~ f'~ f-b\\.~+1n~ (o~trt> \ f5~ ditf4 tY/VI Y?J ~\?7 t-v\~. -t; vtJ\ V\ e_e_r f!l_ o V~ ~ ~ t0Ja ~ tct{VtVv\\ ta~ fVl- H-4 qt &y N9 · 'o Cf 'J ~a.vt~i f\::'!Y OVv? v~ ~e J J~g~~ p ®<9J ;J~.H0 -e~ - ~U ~-.ll t) t:V /'cNceJ -f\ ttJ(J J'6)~ ~ ~ ~ / (Ia) ~ @~~ ~t)~SJ ~e21 ~r0~o~w ~o~'VV ~~su?ro~ 'tlv~/ ~-mJ ~ £(c) . ~-k> ~ ~S ~?f. ~;::; 16}~ o t:6->N'lAP~~- ~' CHEPURI~.JU State Secretary, Telangana Date: .?!-;:?.:-:-:1-..t.?:-:-:-.t~.\) Cell : 9030699836 - J ~~ ~da:5~l?1~ ~~~~~ ~~£tj ~c:)'boc_~"'O mo~J,- ~;;2- ~~:1<)) 'ttl/s .;3-voJ ~ DD~ .c!!J (9EJ ~ ~Jr ~ ~ · C<5DffioobcS . -£S{,fU~y;:0 ~~v£v J;,clj ~ ~s::uf'{Q0 .~~ ~6'"1s o --d~v~.,e- ~'C:() -z.=:DB c9W G::i:be:J 1 ~~ e:l;u ~ ~4'Jo <:mlibo President: 0 ate : .•••.•...... •...... -'1..-2- { l '- l "2--t- I :=t- P.KRISHNAIAH M.L.I.Sc, LLB Cell: 8919514978 Vice President : KOUSIK REDDY Gen. Secretary : . P.DURGA Joint Secretary : M. SHOBHAN YADAV Treasurer: K.SHIVA REDDY Executive Members : CH. LAXMAIAH GOUD CH. GIRl MUDIRAJ K.RAVIRAJ M.RAMULU K.JAI RAJ T.DHAN RAJ M.MUKESH R.RAVINDER ~~ P · D ~ c ~ . ~ ~v-L(p~ 0( -0 ~.,--.evf~ ~ l- - ~ - n ~ .r· Cell: 7287066362 ~ .:~gd No. 24/2007 9985695555, CHEYUTHA RURAL D Address:DoorNo. 1- G . EVELOPMENT SOCIETY Nalgonda191 ' andhi Dist NagarTel ' Wad apally, Damaracberla Mandai . E . · angana State-508355 ' · -mail:cheyutba5555@gma il .com Director: A.Sudarshan '@JjaS:b :_, 9Jf%Ltf: ~JfloJlJ ;y_oiof .:V£oSAf ef5oSn81 ~~;); ~~,:5 ~66\J fJvzy! !v(/J J'olfld ~~ !I;};_ ~~3{ 'iOIB if' ;J1} ')o I D']' 1'_,j,;.9ef} ~~ ~ o ifP" 9! ~oV-1'"1 'w r;uu,, tSJ6!h ~.. 'SI'W 6J~9:r>'JD:5 'IJ$z--rtf o.')x!J dLJ, CJ,Dlfj§loJ,}.f ';,)?J 1} J1J '17:;);) ;;tJ~ rv j)o£\ ~ .f/j()YCO )1 tJ 'ilfJf"l/h {jj;JU ,;;,~ C <5 i._ {jtrf;:; , 'Mf. 'JJit, ';,Jf)u!fO ~ ~ 7' ~~ , eM f) .ru Jr01f/n a~ w o0 a~;..nhJ 1/2, u0 s e~P~fJ ~P; )jt:~ ~c{i' ~S O "'/ 9£;cJI!£_ "£or&c;;~0 C:So»JI)tJ~ eJ.0 J r~~ ~ , ~uJd ~~d:Sl_~c:S ($oct?@\£ ~w&ej ~oCeow ~oo~(S) · ~4 Cc5::J8d:to;:{8 . ti(s. ~~<:5~· .ew~ c~ . (9c90~c~£~ ~2 . ~~ad~ ¥~00ofo ddj~ =={b~e;J :. :9~~· ~~~~72)&10\)~~u 4oo ~beY ~LU ~ d /r ~ =ae.J.i:O ¥ ~e.J~D ~io~:n:~~ "9~8o--c.:::me_v ~oc.Fu ~vfo ~~oi0 ~d:D 83EJ28 · ~~ :ll)tJDDBJe>c:r . ~&:JQo~ ~-vvJ~ e:w~ c._~ . e_9o9o~d; zmJ# ·· ~-15:5~~-<;?J ~ ev~ ~o(g£-c:D . ~61 ~~ ~~~ :9g50'0(!__7rn)2" ,--sfJdJ~~ 0 b. c=6~S- ?--) r-. ~~>() S) '!7,' ~li '-f) ~. go~~ >) t_. -e)~~- ~~· ~s~ci #50 & 51, Amanhgal, Hayathnagar, Ranaga Reddy Oist, T.S. Ph: 7095701975 E·mail: [email protected] . _j /1' ~~!~~~~~~~~- 1 i . ;II Reg.No. 378 I \ 1 D.N;4=5'4, Near Central Bank of India, Vikas Nagar, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad-500 060. Cell : 9440569092 I SANKU SREENIVASULU B.A., LL.B. Date .:.<~~.!2-~-~tr,;-- i State General Secretary . ! • I ·---··---;-I . I + TilE NEW INDIAN EXPRESS AMARAVATI ANDHRA PRADESH POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD REGIONAL OFFICE PLOT NO 41. Opp SBI, Gurunanok Ro.HI , Sro Kanakadurga Officer's Colony VIJAYAWADA-'>:10008 Ph 0866- ]543542 NOTICE OF ENVIItONMI:NTAL PUBLIC HEAftiNG /' _.' In accordance with the Notification No. S.0.1533 dated 14~ September, ·2006 and the ci•rculars Iss ued thereof of the Ministry of Environment, Forest & Cllmat Change (MOEF&OC), Government of India, the A.P. Pollution Control Board hereby Issue public hearing notice for proposed to establish an Industry for manufacture of bulk drugs and Intermediates with a production capacity of 9000 kg/month by. M/s. Sarvanl Labs Pvt. Ltd., located at Sy.No.109, Jayanthlpuram (V), Jaggaiahpet (M), Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh. 1. Name & Address of the Project' M/s. Sarvanl Labs Pvt. Ltd., Office C-1-86, Opp: Panchayati Office, Subbayaguder'n (V), Penuganchiprolu (M), Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh-521190 2. Location of the ProjecUExtent Sy. No.1 09, Jayanthipuram (V), Jaggalahpet (M), Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh .. Extent : 2.93 Acres 3. Name of the Authorized Person io K. Srlnlvasa Raju be contacted with address ·and P.No-406, E-Biock, Vertax Pride Apartments, phone No. Jayabharath Nagar, Nizampet Road, Kukaipally, Hyderabad-85 Ph: 9290055441,040-48509135 4 . Project Cost Rs . 6.38 crores 5. Line of Activity Bulk Drugs and Intermediates 6. Date & Time 22-12-2017, 3.00pm Venue of Public Hearing Jayanthlpuram (V), Jaggalahpet (M), Krishna District. • ·-··•. '-. 7. Places of availability of Executive Summary & EIA Report, which are kept open for public: 1. Office oflhe District Collector Machllipatnam, Krishna District. 2. Office of the Chief Executive Officer, Zillapanshad, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 3. Office of the General Manager, District Industries Center, Vljayawada. 4. Office of the Member Secretary, APPCB, Head Office: Kasturibalpet, Chalamalavari Street, Vijayawada. 5. Office ofthe Principal Secretary, EFS& T Department, A.P. Secretariat,Amaravathl. 6. Office of the Joint Chief Environmental Engineer, APPCB, Zonal Office, Plot No.41 , Opp. SBH, Gurunanak Road, Sri Kanakadurga Officer's Colony, Vijayawada 7. Grampanchayat Offices of 1)Dharmavarampadu Thanda, 2)Chllakallu, 3)Vedadrl, 4 )Jayanthipuram. 5)Gowravaram, 6)Pochampalli, 7)Kavuthavar1Agraharam of Jaggaiahpet (M), Krishna District. 8. Office of the Tahslldar. Jaggalahpet, Jaggalahpet Mandai, Krishna Dist. 9. Municipal Office. Jaggaiahpet, Jaggaiahpet Mandai,,Knshna Dlst. 10 Office of the Environmental Engineer,•APPCB, Regional Office, Plot No.41, Opp. SBI, Gurunanak Road, Sri Kanakadurga Officer's Colon~. Vljay~~J;da .. • . ; In accordance with MOEF&CC Notification No. S.O . 153J, serial No.7 (!)stage (Ill) (ii5:a & b, d.t.14- ; 09-2006, suggestions, vjews, COil)l'nent.s and objections of the public if any dn the above project are invited on or before·3o days. All 1/l~ persons can also make written suggeslions to the under signed officer of !hi! Andhra Rradesl;l Pollutipn Control Board. All the persons can participate in public hearing on the date and venua!>p~cified above. Sd/- -~ .A"· ·'tJ? ... ;··,l ' . .·:·· . .,_!:;.- ·=~:. 1:_· ~~OJ"Oo ~~oe-)6 1o, .2017 + .. ,. . #- ,~.-· , h' I -~ .... ~ .. - .... ~ ,~ .- •• A.-,-....-•,..,..,_~~..0 ~ ego~~a-d" saeneilo ID 2. IP-B'B t;5cl<1~ I n§!jo ~'ds l s. ~.,. ..;s~o:;;Jdb ' '0. ,ft,:J.,..:$oo ... ~ol150o.:SO'iv:'>.:i .:ioex>Oil b.oo-406, "'-q::l!, ~"~~ll ...o-~;lbo!Sj, !!o':lb ooi;>B"O !,<», OIO":IJ- ,. II. l!)lliO-M~!!.,..,.onO'i Name of the Person and Opinion Response from the Project S.No Expressed during Public Hearing Proponent Malaavath Venkateswar Naik, Jayanthipuram He welcomed the industry in Jayanthipuram 1. Thanked him for his support village and opined that more industries should come in this area. Islavath Srinu, Janyanthipuram Village Thanked him for his support. He supported the industry coming in this We will provide maximum village which will reduce the unemployment of possible employment to the 2. the youth. He suggested tree plantation shall local people. be taken up in the villages to reduce the We will initiate plantation pollution and it should be at the beginning of program during construction the construction of industry. phase only. B.Mallikarjuna Rao, Sarpanch, Jayanthipuram Village Thanked him for his support. He welcomed the project and informed many We assure that our company 3. more industries like this should come in this will contribute for the local village which is the only solution of employment generation. unemployment. Ch. Guruvayya, Jayanthipuram Village He also supported the industry coming up in Thanked him for his support. this area and informed that it would helpful to We assured that maximum the youth for employment. He referred about employment will be given to the the CSR Activities which should be spent in local unemployed youth. the surrounding villages only. He further 4. We will allocate the CSR funds informed that by establishing the industries to the surrounding villages. the Panchayath also get beneficiated We assure that we will take all financially. He suggested that there shall not possible measures to control the be any odour nuisance from the proposed odour pollution. industry and the villagers shall not get affected due to odour. Narikella Nagabhushana Rao, Jayanthipuram Thanked him for his support. Village We assured that maximum While welcoming the industry, he informed that employment will be given to the 5. employment should be given on priority to local unemployed educated local educated youth. The industry youth. management should be helpful to the poor people of the village. I. Nageswara Rao, K. Agraharam Thanked him for his support. 6. He also welcomed the industry coming up in We assured that maximum this area. He also suggested to give priority to employment will be given to the local villagers for employment and local unemployed youth. development activities for the surrounding We will provide RO water plant villagers. for drinking water to the Jayanthipuram village and to the villages near to the project. Gundla Krishna Rao, K.Agraharam Thanked him for his support. While welcoming the project, informed that We assured that maximum employment on priority to local youth. Further employment will be given to the 7. he suggested that there shall not be any local unemployed youth and We pollution problems in the surrounding villages. will take all necessary measures to control the pollution from plant operations. Bandla Gnana Prakash Rao, Jayanthipuram Thanked him for his support. Village. We assured that maximum 8. While welcoming the project, he referred employment will be given to the about the employment to the local educated local unemployed educated youth. youth. Kota Rao, Jaggaihpeta He welcomed the CSR fund to be spent by the Thanked him for his support. Managing Director. He suggested that We assure that we will spend an spending of CSR fund should not be limited to amount of 32 lakhs under CSR Jayanthipuram Village, it should be extended 9. funds to the local villages and to Jaggaihpeta and other Villages. we will develop avenue Enviromental conditions in Jaggaihpeta plantation. should be improved by taking of tree plantation and their protection which would control the temperatures in Jaggaihpeta. Mullangi Rama Krishna Reddy, Sarpanch, Pochampally He informed that the industries in this area are not extending any help to Pochampally village though it is existing very close to industries. He requested the industries to extend their We assure that we will take all help on par with the villages where the possible measures to control the 10. industries are located. The surrounding pollution from the proposed villages shall also be developed financially. project. While welcoming the project he suggested that if at all any pollution problems / damage to the villagers, the industry should be closed accordingly a GO should be issued by the Government. 11. Sunandha Reddy, NGO Thanked him for his support. He welcomed the Project and supported for We will develop rain water issuing of license. He suggested the following harvesting structures within in to be taken up by the Proponent. project site and nearby villages I. Rain water harvesting structure shall be to conserve the ground water constructed for rising of ground water table. table. We assure that the local II. He welcomed the 36% of greenbelt as educated youth would be given proposed by the proponent. He suggested preference for employment for that the greenbelt shall have medicinal local villages. Further we will plants and fruit bearing trees. extend their guidance / help to III. The industry management shall impart local youth for development of training to local youth for skill skill for employment. development. We assure that we will not IV. Water, air and soil shall not be polluted in cause any water, air and soil the surrounding villages. pollution to the surrounding areas. Y.Chenna Kesava Reddy, NGO, Hyderabad. Thanked him for his support. While welcoming the project he suggested the We assure that the local following. educated youth will be given I. Employment shall be given to local youth preference for employment. only. We will allocate the CSR funds II. CSR funds shall be spent to villages within to the surrounding villages and 12. 10 kms from the project site. ZLD system will be installed to III. STP and water treatment plants shall be treat and reuse the generated established. effluents. IV. Medical camps shall be taken up in the We have noted your suggestion surrounding villages. to conduct Medical camps. Dhundigala Anjayya, NGO, Nalgonda Thanked him for his support. He welcomed the project and would be helpful We assured that maximum for giving employment to the locals. He employment will be given to the 13. suggested that CSR funds shall be spent to local unemployed youth. the surrounding villages. We will allocate the CSR funds to the surrounding villages. Perika Krishnayya, NGO, Hyderabad Thanked him for his support. He supported the project and suggested that We assured that maximum employment shall be given on priority to local employment will be given to the 14. youth and CSR fund shall be spent for local local unemployed youth and we poor people. will allocate the CSR funds to the surrounding villages. Vijaya Reddy, NGO, Hyderabad We have prepared EIA report as 15. He mentioned that the study on agricultural per Granted ToR. sector, animal husbandry, human life period Emissions from our proposed was not carried out in EIA report. He project will be well within the suggested the above points shall also be limits of standards. included in EIA. Though the chemical industries adopted ZLD the pollution of Rivers are not stopped. He referred about the sustainable development and the industries should adopt the systems accordingly. He also referred about the release of pollutants like SO2 and NOx in huge quantities from the proposed industry which would affect the environment. He also referred about the CSR fund allocated by the proponent which is not covered under CSR GO. Lavanam Chandhra Shekar, NGO, Nalgonda Thanked him for his support. He welcomed the project and suggested that We assured that maximum 16. employment shall be given to local youth. employment will be given to the local unemployed educated youth. L<.,. ·... ·· .. lR._ :e.::-~~~<.Y ~SJ"-"~· ~~~6'1 ~ ~~@::_ J\J i0 ~~.,}) ~@' r-J~ r--:,~~ ~~w ~ V- M-rJ - ~ ,