DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Scoping Comments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Scoping Comments Non-Native Aquatic Species EA Scoping Comments 1 CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED FROM THE PUBLIC ON THE SCOPE OF THE EXPANDED NON-NATIVE AQUATIC SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Note to Reader: The comments contained in this Appendix were entered into and exported from an online comment database. Greetings, salutations, and concluding thank you statements have been removed, except in letters provided as attachments to comments. In some cases, the comment system translated commenter input into stray characters that were undecipherable; we have attempted to represent those comments as accurately as possible, but in some cases, ambiguity concerning the commenter’s intent remains. 1 There should be a high catch limit (10 or more) or unlimited catch limit on Rainbow Trout and Brown Trout. Also, the NPS should recognize Navajo Nation's boundaries to include the mid river point of the Colorado River where the Navajo Nation boundary meets with the Colorado River. 2 I write this on behalf of the Desert Fly Casters, an Arizona Angling Club headquartered in the Phoenix Metropolitan area, and an affiliate of the Fly Fishers International. As such, we are a formal part of the organization that sponsors the Recreational Fishing Representatives to the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program. We are several hundred members strong, and many of our members have long been frequent anglers on the Lees Ferry Rainbow Trout Fishery. Anglers from the Phoenix area surely make up amajor portion of those who visit and care about the Lees Ferry fishery. We have noted the request, as copied below, asking for an extension of the proposed comment period and for an additional public meeting in the Phoenix area for the subject EA. That request has been sent to you by thoseGCDAMP representatives, John Jordan, John Hamill and Joe Miller, and we want to strongly add our voice tothat request. In the past, Our organization and individual members have commented on the CFMP EA and on the LTEMP EIS, and we certainly want to comment on this proposed action by the NPS. But we feel that the present comment period and the proposed public meeting locations as now scheduled do not provide us a reasonable opportunity to participate in that process. We specifically ask that the comment period be extended by 30 days, and that a public meeting be scheduled in the Phoenix area so that we may equitably participate in this public process. Please advise us that you will accommodate that request, and of the additional date and location of the additional meeting. 3 As President of the Grand Canyon Chapter of Trout Unlimited I have two comments. Non-Native Aquatic Species EA Scoping Comments 2 1. We would like the comment period to be extended beyond the holiday period. Many of our members, officers and board members are out of the area and we would like time to meet and discuss this proposal. 2. We think you should also have a meeting in the Phoenix area. While meetings in Flagstaff and Page are great many of the anglers that come to Lee's Ferry are from the Phoenix Metro area. If you have a meeting in Phoenix it would also allow people from Tucson to attend. 4 The Non-native Aquatic Species EA Scoping has arrived and brings with it a couple of requests. Those of us representing a coalition of Trout Unlimited, International Federation of Fly Fishers, community fishingclubs, individual anglers, and recreational fishing for the GCDAMP believe that it is in the best interest of the EA to extend the participation period by thirty days to a total of sixty days and to add an additional public open house. These requests are relevant to shaping a final preferred alternative. Preferred Alternative B, in its present form, has elements that border on unacceptable and have the likely hood of being highly contentious and strongly opposed by the angling community both procedurally and politically. Those elements need to be confronted and resolved for a successful EA. The thirty day public scoping period is hardly adequate with a starting date from the date of public announcement, spread over a holiday period, and without the reviewed final product of the brown trout workshop integrated in to the alternatives. There has been a pattern in the past of announcing November/December thirty day commenting periods that while serving Federal agency purposes does not serve the impacted parties. With that in mind a total sixty day scoping period is requested, which should also provide for the finalized brown trout white paper to help shape a preferred alternative. The public scoping webinar and two open houses are good steps for engaging the public. However, webinars as informative as they may be are inadequate for meaningful interaction at a productive level. Having an open house in Page is commendable and provides a participation opportunity for the Marble Canyon community and businesses that are most dependent on the Lees Ferry trout fishery and will be most affected by the EA. While a Flagstaff meeting is also desirable the base for affected anglers is in and around Phoenix. The intent of the scoping period should be to obtain meaningful and constructive comment leading towards an informed alternative decision that will be acceptable across the broadest spectrum possible. It would be unfortunate if there was the perception that not having a Phoenix open house was intentional rather than an over site. With that in mind a Phoenix area public open house meeting is requested. 5 It has come to our attention that the new Non-native Species Management Plan and EA Scoping process only has two meetings scheduled in northern Arizona and a 30 day comment period. One behalf of myself and the entire business community of Marble Canyon-Lees Ferry, we urge consideration to expand these public meeting to include other areas of the state as well as extend Non-Native Aquatic Species EA Scoping Comments 3 the comment period to at least 60 or 90 days. Lees Ferry is a trout fishing recreation destination for people from all over the state of Arizona (as well as nationally) and to limit the public meetings to the geographic northern part of the state and to a 30 day comment period is going to exclude many who wish their voices to be heard. A longer comment period and meetings in Phoenix (and perhaps Tucson) are appropriate for a fair opportunity for public comment and involvement. 6 The Payson Flycasters and Gila Trout Chapter of Trout Unlimited also encourage you as did John Jordon, John Hamill and Joe Miller to extend the EA Scoping period from 30 to 60 days and add a public open house on the matter in the Phoenix area. 7 We represent the Sun City Grand Fishing Club. We are a group of 100+ men and women who enjoysport fishing mostly around Arizona. Our members live in Surprise Arizona, in the Phoenix metro area. We have monitored the study process of the Lees Ferry fishery for many years and our members enjoy fishing there, often doing overnight trips which include spending money on lodging and hiring guides. In recent years as the fishing has been less consistent our trips have diminished, whether that is caused by the high flow events or whatever, it has impacted our use and enjoyment of this fine resource. We look forward to improved conditions for fishing at Lees Ferry. We are informed the new Non-native Aquatic Species EA Scoping has arrived and only allows for a 30 day comment period. At this time of year when many of our members are traveling, this hardly allows for our input. We also note there are meetings in Page and Flagstaff which is good, but nothing in the Phoenix area where a significant number of the Lees Ferry sport fishers live. We would request that more time be allowed for comment and that you have a public meeting in the Phoenix area which we will attend. 8 I am in receipt of a copy of the "Expanded Non-native Aquatic Species Management Plan in GlenCanyon National Recreation Area and Grand Canyon National Park below Glen Canyon Dam AnEnvironmental Assessment. Having read through this document, please consider the following: 1) Public meetings in Page and Flagstaff are fine for the folks who live in that area. However, most Arizona residents are in Phoenix and Tucson, well south of either Flagstaff or Page. For people in Tucson, travel to Flagstaff is nearly a 600-mile round trip and will require an overnight stay. Those in Phoenix are somewhat closer (350-mile round trip), but still a long car ride, and perhaps without the overnight stay. Since you are asking for public input and most of the public are in Phoenix and Tucson, why not schedule an additional public meeting in the Phoenix area to accommodate those in the population centers of the State? A webinar, while informative, is not the same as face-to-face, two-way conversation. 2) The 30-day public scoping period seems inadequate, especially if another public meeting can be incorporated into the process. In fact, the scoping period will have ended by the time the Non-Native Aquatic Species EA Scoping Comments 4 white paper from the brown trout workshop, held in Phoenix September 21-22, is available for review. Perhaps extending the scoping period by an additional 30 days will allow for receipt and review of this document, and to incorporate any findings into the remedial action plan. The NPS preferred plan, Preferred Alternate B, will certainly generate interest and comment from the angling community, most of whom live in central and southern Arizona.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Native Fish Conservation
    Yellowstone SScience Native Fish Conservation @ JOSH UDESEN Native Trout on the Rise he waters of Yellowstone National Park are among the most pristine on Earth. Here at the headwaters of the Missouri and Snake rivers, the park’s incredibly productive streams and lakes support an abundance of fish. Following the last Tglacial period 8,000-10,000 years ago, 12 species/subspecies of fish recolonized the park. These fish, including the iconic cutthroat trout, adapted and evolved to become specialists in the Yellowstone environment, underpinning a natural food web that includes magnificent animals: ospreys, bald eagles, river otters, black bears, and grizzly bears all feed upon cutthroat trout. When the park was established in 1872, early naturalists noted that about half of the waters were fishless, mostly because of waterfalls which precluded upstream movement of recolonizing fishes. Later, during a period of increasing popularity of the Yellowstone sport fishery, the newly established U.S. Fish Commission began to extensively stock the park’s waters with non-natives, including brown, brook, rainbow, and lake trout. Done more than a century ago as an attempt to increase an- gling opportunities, these actions had unintended consequences. Non-native fish caused serious negative impacts on native fish populations in some watersheds, and altered the parks natural ecology, particularly at Yellowstone Lake. It took a great deal of effort over many decades to alter our native fisheries. It will take a great deal more work to restore them. As Aldo Leopold once said, “A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic com- munity.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Sky Montana Fishing Report
    Big Sky Montana Fishing Report Swampier and librational Cleveland fornicates her muck fiddle or inwraps broadly. Allan is classy and speculated smuttily as freakiest Dominick typings synecdochically and retuning ita. Orthotropous and pandemoniacal Paten fax some digestives so unfittingly! Gallatin report extremely important trout just swing. Information you fish reports and reported solid using the sky fishing adventure is necessary to. Whitney Williams, Oregon. Mitigate for big sky skiers look. Hidden Creek Outfitters is an equal opportunity service provider. Make the montana fishing big sky? Upper kenai river guides running hopper patterns that the lake marina place. Manistee river report current condition to be great deal of fishing big sky montana report big sky skiers look for spring speaks promises a democrat jon tester three dollar type a job requires hiring process. Montana montana is a big sky also find ample fishing report big sky montana fishing has. Clackamas river report big game currently closed to account into my home base fare in and caddis flies along with spectacular salmon fly fishing. Check montana fish reports and big sky country specializing in northwestern yellowstone is bad, i soon as well as the trinity river. Confluence at big sky fishing report big sky, mt eric adams, yellow just minutes from. Discover montana fishing report current conditions this river remained good. Our expert Montana fly fishing guides also offer excellent spin fishing trips on the Madison, Picnicking, lead ammunition Two of four appointees proposed by Gov. Whitefish mountain spring creeks in the headwaters have to visit, ny has never known as soon the sky montana fly fishing truly rustic experience the like fall fishing marina boat is a problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Scoping Comments
    4/16/2018 Request for Scoping Comments Submission Successful Your Submission ID is: SCOP0918-1-1 13702 Names & Addresses Cathy Purves 220 North 8th Street PO Box 64 Lander, Wyoming 82520, United States Email Address: [email protected] Day Phone: 1307-332-6700 Evening Phone: Fax Number: Other Phone: Agency: Public Web Page Organization/Group: Trout Unlimited Position: Science Coordinator Andy Rasmussen 1558 KC Lane Logan, Utah 84321, United States Email Address: [email protected] Day Phone: 1435-760-0089 Evening Phone: Fax Number: Other Phone: Agency: Public Web Page Organization/Group: Trout Unlimited Position: Utah Sportsmen's Coordinator Comments Comment 1 ID: Comment September 2018 BLM Oil and Gas Lease Sale Title: Hello Sheri, Please accept the following comments from Trout Unlimited on the 2018 Utah BLM oil and gas lease sale. These comments reflect all field office sales and scoping comments. We appreciate this opportunity. Please also look for a Comment: faxed copy of our comments in case this doesn't get uploaded properly. Thanks, Cathy Purves Trout Unlimited Attachment:TU-UTSept2018LeaseComments-04162018.pdf Submission Classification Response Type: Front Office Submission Form Delivery Type: Front Office Submission Form Receipt Date: 04/16/2018 Status: ACTIVE Agreements No - Withhold personally identifying information from future publications on this project? Yes - Please include me on the mailing list for this project? Original Submission Files 1/1 Sent via: Fax 801-539-4237 and via electronic ePlanning NEPA Project Link April 16, 2018 Sheri Wysong Fluid Mineral Leasing Coordinator Bureau of Land Management Utah State Office 440 West 200 South, Suite 500 Salt Lake City, UT 84101 RE: Comments and scoping comments on the September 2018 Utah BLM Oil and Gas Lease Sale for the West Desert BLM District Office and the Utah State BLM Office: .
    [Show full text]
  • Sent Comments Via Email To: [email protected] February 8, 2017
    Sent comments via email to: [email protected] February 8, 2017 Cindy Ledbetter Bureau of Land Management Richfield Field Office 150 East 900 North Richfield, UT 84701 RE: Comments to the Utah BLM June 2017 Oil and Gas Lease Sale EA and Parcels UT-0517-004, 005, 018, 020, 021, 022 and 025. Dear Ms. Ledbetter, Please accept the following comments on the Utah BLM’s Color Country Environmental Assessment (EA) for Parcels UT-0517-004, -018, -020, -021, -022, and -025 proposed for the June 2017 oil and gas lease sale. These parcels are located within the Richfield BLM Field Office. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this sale. Trout Unlimited (TU) has 154,000 members nationwide and approximately 1,500 members associated with eight chapters throughout Utah including chapters in the areas these parcels are located. Our mission is to protect and restore coldwater fisheries and their habitats in Utah and across the West. Consistent with that mission, it is TU’s policy to encourage energy development in a way that meets the needs of people while eliminating, minimizing, or mitigating the impacts to coldwater fisheries and their watersheds. Our members enjoy fishing and hunting on these lands in addition to working on restoration projects in order to maintain and improve fisheries habitat. On behalf of our members, we offer the following comments. Concerns Regarding Lack of Fisheries and Watershed Information in EA We are concerned about the lack of analysis for watersheds and the associated fisheries in the June 2017 EA. Many of the parcels being offered for lease have a nexus to streams that bear coldwater fisheries and a state of Utah Blue Ribbon designation.
    [Show full text]
  • Swimming Upstream: Freshwater Fish in a Warming World 3 Too Hot to Handle
    SWIMMING UPSTREAM FRESHWATER FISH IN A WARMINGSwimming Upstream: Freshwater WORLD Fish in a Warming World 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary 2 A New Threat for Fish 4 Too Hot to Handle USFWS 6 More Extreme Weather Creates New Challenges 10 Changing Complexion of Winter 15 Climate Change Adds Insult to Injury for Fish 20 Climate-Related Shifts in the Broader Environment 22 Giving Freshwater Fish a Fighting Chance 27 Lead Authors & Acknowledgements 28 Endnotes 2 National Wildlife Federation Frank Weissbarth EXECUTIVE SUMMARY USFWS hether fly fishing for wild mean increased likelihood of fish W trout in the legendary mortality. Shorter winters with less USFWS waters of Yellowstone National Park snow and ice cover mean shifts in or ice fishing on Michigan’s famed stream flow and water availability Black Lake, fishing traditions hold through the spring and summer a special place for Americans of all months, as well as lost opportunities ages. Generations have enjoyed our for ice fishing. nation’s clean waters in pursuit of the fish that give life to rivers, streams, We need to act swiftly to protect our and lakes across the country. Today, fishing heritage. We must cut the angling is big business, generating carbon pollution that currently is on $26 billion annually in expenditures track to cause significant warming by some 27 million adults. by mid-century. At the same time, we must take steps to safeguard fish Changing climate poses new risks and their habitats from the climate for our treasured freshwater fish changes that we can no longer avoid. resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Pitts, Heidi M.; Thacher, Jennifer A.; Champ
    Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 17:446–462, 2012 Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1087-1209 print / 1533-158X online DOI: 10.1080/10871209.2012.677939 A Hedonic Price Analysis of the Outfitter Market for Trout Fishing in the Rocky Mountain West HEIDI M. PITTS,1 JENNIFER A. THACHER,1 PATRICIA A. CHAMP,2 AND ROBERT P. BERRENS1 1Department of Economics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA 2Rocky Mountain Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA Trout is the most popular sport fish in Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico where fishing outfitters bring revenues to many rural economies. This article uses the hedonic pricing method on a monopolistically competitive outfitter market in those four states to examine angler values for trout fishing characteristics. A total of 1,685 fish- ing trip observations were collected from 198 outfitter websites during the 2009 fishing season. Vectors of variables describe states, trip characteristics, trout species, and river destinations. Descriptions were used to estimate marginal implicit prices for fishing characteristics. Anglers highly valued fishing in Montana, Wyoming, and Colorado relative to New Mexico and fishing for only cutthroat trout as compared to brown, rainbow, and cutthroat trout together. Anglers also preferred quality indicators such as trophy-size trout opportunities, blue ribbon stream designation, and private land access. Results are related to cutthroat trout conservation strategies and recent state legislative bills regarding stream access. Keywords Rocky Mountain West, trout, fishing, hedonic analysis, cutthroat, private land, cutthroat conservation, stream access laws Introduction Trout are a freshwater fish that prefer cold water mountain streams and lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • New Venture Protects Rock Creek Gatewayby Bruce Farling and Grant Kier Ivers, People and Communities in Perpetuity, the Gateway to This Come Together
    SPRING TROUT LINE 2012 Newsletter from the Montana Council of Trout Unlimited New Venture Protects Rock Creek Gatewayby Bruce Farling and Grant Kier ivers, people and communities in perpetuity, the gateway to this come together. But only on iconic trout stream. After more Rrare occasions do they merge at than a year of negotiation, the land once and in one place. A new venture trust has reached an agreement to protect the with LEMB mouth of the blue Combined with conservation Co, LLC to ribbon waters of easements on neighboring purchase Rock Creek near properties, the acquisition will 201-acres at Missoula is one of the mouth of those occasions. permanently protect more than Rock Creek for Five Valleys two miles of the Clark Fork River $1.6 million. Land Trust, with and more than a mile of Rock Creek. The site, which the support of also includes Imagine 37 new homes here. Or not. Grant Kier photo Montana TU, the Westslope Chapter frontage along the Clark Fork, had the Clark Fork Coalition and Trout of TU and the Clark Fork Coalition, been slated for a controversial 37- Unlimited to develop a common vision have launched the Rock Creek lot subdivision with an artificial fish for the property. Confluence Project in order to protect, pond at its core. Once the purchase is That vision includes eliminating the complete, Five Valleys will work with See ROCK CREEK, page 7 Partners Fight AIS in Montana by Morgan Sparks and Mark Aagenes rguably, Montana’s most settings. However, Montana TU and Montana has established monitoring important resource is others are focusing now on problem and prevention programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Fish Conservation
    S Native Fish Conservation @ JOSH UDESEN Native Trout on the Rise he waters of Yellowstone National Park are among the most pristine on Earth. Here at the headwaters of the Missouri and Snake rivers, the park’s incredibly productive streams and lakes support an abundance of fish. Following the last Tglacial period 8,000-10,000 years ago, 12 species/subspecies of fish recolonized the park. These fish, including the iconic cutthroat trout, adapted and evolved to become specialists in the Yellowstone environment, underpinning a natural food web that includes magnificent animals: ospreys, bald eagles, river otters, black bears, and grizzly bears all feed upon cutthroat trout. When the park was established in 1872, early naturalists noted that about half of the waters were fishless, mostly because of waterfalls which precluded upstream movement of recolonizing fishes. Later, during a period of increasing popularity of the Yellowstone sport fishery, the newly established U.S. Fish Commission began to extensively stock the park’s waters with non-natives, including brown, brook, rainbow, and lake trout. Done more than a century ago as an attempt to increase an- gling opportunities, these actions had unintended consequences. Non-native fish caused serious negative impacts on native fish populations in some watersheds, and altered the parks natural ecology, particularly at Yellowstone Lake. It took a great deal of effort over many decades to alter our native fisheries. It will take a great deal more work to restore them. As Aldo Leopold once said, “A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic com- munity.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Chapter of the American Fisheries Society 2019 Annual Meeting
    Utah Chapter of the American Fisheries Society 2019 Annual Meeting Photo Credits: Christopher Keleher Provo, Utah March 12th-14th, 2019 PROGRAM AFS CALL FOR PAPERS The American Fisheries Society extends a warm invite to attend the 149th AFS Annual Meeting in Reno, Nevada, Sept. 29–Oct. 3, 2019. This year The Wildlife Society and American Fisheries Society will come together for the first-ever joint national conference of these two organizations. The event will likely be the largest gathering of fish and wildlife professionals ever, and will provide unprecedented opportunities for science-sharing and potential collaboration. At this conference, we hope to give members opportunities to learn, connect, and engage in ways that will help propel their careers forward and inspire even better results in the areas of wildlife and fisheries science and management. CONTRIBUTED PAPERS AND POSTERS Those who wish to present in Contributed Papers or Poster sessions at the 2019 AFS meeting are required to submit abstracts by April 12, 2019. Confirmation of acceptance or refusal of abstracts will be communicated by April 25, 2019. Student presentations will be considered for a “best presentation” award if the student fills out additional application paperwork available at https://education.fisheries.org FOR MORE INFORMATION VISIT https://fisheries.org 2019 PRESIDENTS WELCOME On behalf of the Utah Chapter of the American Fisheries Society Executive Committee, we would like to extend you a warm welcome to our 41st Annual Meeting in Provo, Utah! A special thanks goes out to the Utah Valley Convention Center, Hyatt Place, Marriot Springhill Suites, and the Balcony/Good Thyme Café for hosting us and providing a comfortable atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • CBFC NEWSLETTER Dec2016.Pages
    December 2016 2016 OFFICERS CLUB PURPOSE: To promote fly fishing, to conserve regional President-Ted Poston fishing resources, and to encourage friendship and cooperation 509-438-0531 [email protected] among all anglers. First VP-Membership: NEXT MEETING: Tuesday, 13Dec2016, at Country Gentlemen in Rich Holten Kennewick. Starts 6p. Second VP-Programs: Craig Anderson PROGRAM: Chinese Gift Exchange: Members, family members, and Treasurer: guests are welcome to join in. To participate, bring a gift valued Jeff Drowley about $15, or something you have made, such as a box of flies. Secretary: Wrap it in an unmarked box or unidentifiable container. Rules are Mike Wade simple. People bringing gifts will draw a Directors at large: number. The person drawing #1 starts Dale Schielke the exchange and selects a gift, opens John Strand it, and shows it to other participants. Dennis Collins Then the person drawing #2 selects Newsletter Editor: either an unopened gift or steals the gift Ron Reed from #1, in which case #1 selects Past President: another unopened gift, opens it, and Jim Loomis shows it to participants. Then #3 MEETINGS selects a gift, either unopened or steals Second Tuesday of one previously opened. The process every month except continues until all the gifts are opened. March, July, and However, once a gift is claimed by its August at third owner, it is frozen and no longer Country Gentlemen eligible for confiscation. Owners of 9221 W Clearwater opened gifts must keep them visible and Kennewick, WA display them when requested. The gift exchange ends when the last gift 6:00p -Wet Fly-no is opened, unless #1's gift was never stolen.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Fish Conservation
    Yellowstone SScience Native Fish Conservation @ JOSH UDESEN Native Trout on the Rise he waters of Yellowstone National Park are among the most pristine on Earth. Here at the headwaters of the Missouri and Snake rivers, the park’s incredibly productive streams and lakes support an abundance of fish. Following the last Tglacial period 8,000-10,000 years ago, 12 species/subspecies of fish recolonized the park. These fish, including the iconic cutthroat trout, adapted and evolved to become specialists in the Yellowstone environment, underpinning a natural food web that includes magnificent animals: ospreys, bald eagles, river otters, black bears, and grizzly bears all feed upon cutthroat trout. When the park was established in 1872, early naturalists noted that about half of the waters were fishless, mostly because of waterfalls which precluded upstream movement of recolonizing fishes. Later, during a period of increasing popularity of the Yellowstone sport fishery, the newly established U.S. Fish Commission began to extensively stock the park’s waters with non-natives, including brown, brook, rainbow, and lake trout. Done more than a century ago as an attempt to increase an- gling opportunities, these actions had unintended consequences. Non-native fish caused serious negative impacts on native fish populations in some watersheds, and altered the parks natural ecology, particularly at Yellowstone Lake. It took a great deal of effort over many decades to alter our native fisheries. It will take a great deal more work to restore them. As Aldo Leopold once said, “A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic com- munity.
    [Show full text]
  • LEE's FERRY FISH MANAGEMENT REPORT L994-Lgg7
    COLORADO RIVER LEE'S FERRY FISH MANAGEMENT REPORT L994-Lgg7 Arizona Game and Fish Department 222L W. Greenway Road Phoenix, M 85023 Scott Reger, Fisheries Program Manager, Region II Charles Benedict, Fisheries Specialist Jodi Ni ccum, Fi sheri es Speci al 'ist Yvonne Magnuson, Creel Clerk Bill Persons, Research Branch Andrew Ayers, Research Branch INTRODUCTION Since its "discovery" by the angling public, the blue - ribbon fishery at Lee's Ferry has probably generated more controversy than any other fishery in the state. Since 1978 there has been a virtual continuous argument over flows, management, and especially angling regulations. In the mid 1980's a combination of past stocking, high flows, and a tremendous increase in angling pressure greatly reduced the quality of the fishery. Changes in stocking, more stable flows, more restrictive regulations and reduced pressures resulted in an improvement in the late 1980's. Test flows in 1990 - l99l appear to have reduced the food base, and this stress was concurent with an explosion of parasitic nematodes. The result was poor condition and the eventual mortality of a large percentage of the adult trout (and a subsequent reduced angling pressure). Most recently, the situation has been one of "interim flows" - which greatly reduced flow fluctuations, a rising (55 feet in 1993) Lake Powell, the supplemental stocking of larger trout, and light fishing pressure - mostly from catch-and- release anglers. As a result, natural recruitment is high, growth has improved, fish condition-- is improvinB, and fish numbers and catch rates are increasing. Because of these confounding influences, the effectiveness of the present slot limit in bringing back, let alone maintaining, a blue ribbon fishery is not yet clear.
    [Show full text]