Energy and Development in Kenya Opportunities and Constraints

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Energy and Development in Kenya Opportunities and Constraints Energy and Development in Kenya Opportunities and Constraints Published by The Beijer fnstitute The Scandina\.i:tn lr~srirrrrc The Royal Swedish of African Studics Academy of Scicnccs IJpf.~sala.Swedcr~ Stockholm. Swedcn ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA 1 ENERGY AND DEVELOPMENT IN KENYA: OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS Edited by PHIL O'KEEFE, PAUL RASKIN AND STEVE BERNOW Published by THE BEIJER INSTITUTE THE SCANDINAVIAN INSTITUTE The Royal Swedish OF AFRICAN STUDIES Academy of Sciences Uppsal a, Sweden Stockholm, Sweden The series "Energy, Environment and Development in Africa" is pub- lished jointly by the Beijer Institute and the Scandinavian Insti- tute of African Studies with financial support from the Swedish International Development Authority (SIDA) . This book together with a series of companion volumes reports on a Beijer Institute study, the "Kenyan Fuelwood Project", undertaken jointly with the Government of Kenya. ISSN 0281 -8515 ISBN 91-7106-225-4 @the Beijer Institute and the Scandinavian Institute of hfrican Studies 1984 Printed in Sweden by Bohuslaningens AB, Uddeval la 1984 The material presented in this Volume i S a summary of the findings of the Kenyan Fuelwood Project. The detailed analytical data on which these findings rest are contained in a series of technical volumes to be published later. It is worth recording how the Project came into being because its long period of incubation prior to start-up marks the gradual shifting of pub1i c perceptions about energy and energy p1 anning. As late as 1978 the belief was still widely held that of all the primary energy consumed in Kenya, about 80 per cent came from imported oil. But by 1980, the role of wood, charcoal and crop-wastes as fuels became generally recognized. By this time, it was being suggested that maybe as much as three-quarters of Kenya's annual primary energy was consumed as wood, charcoal and crop-residues with only about 20 per cent coming from oil. In other words, the predominant use of biomass-fuels by ordinary households for cooking, space-heating and even lighting also began to be accepted as "energy". This put the 25 per cent or so used in the commercial and industrial sectors into a more balanced perspective. In November 1977, the recently founded Beijer Institute began work on Energy and Development issues as part of the research remit mapped out for it by its International Advisory Board. Since the energy problems in East Africa seemed at that time to be critical, it was decided to embark on a long-term study of energyldevelopment issues in East Africa using Kenya as a case-study. Discussions began with Kenyan scientists in Stockholm and Nairobi in February 1978. Future energy provision was already under active consideration within Kenya and discussions led to an agreement with the Kenyan Energy Sub-committee to develop a two-phase seminar. Under Phase I, the National Council for Science and Technology (NCST) of Kenya planned a Kenyan National Energy Symposium to identify the main energy "actors" within Kenya and to initiate a forum for energy debate. This was held very successfully in November 1978. Under Phase 11, the Bei jer Institute would plan an International Workshop of a technical nature to provide a fact-base for elucidating the energy-policy issues of Kenya. This was held in Nairobi in May 1979 with wide local and international attendance. The Workshop was organized by the Beijer Institute and CO-sponsored by the Kenyan Academy of Sciences and the United Nations Environment Programme who subsequently published the Proceedings. As a result of this, the Government suggested that the Beijer Institute explore further the major theme of its Workshop - the role of fuelwood as a focal point in the energy economy of Kenya - and the preliminary discussions with the Ministry of Power and Communications were eventually transferred to the Ministry of Energy, newly formed after the October 1979 election. The Ministry required a detailed work-p1 an to be prepared and submitted to it for discussion prior to our embarking upon the work itself which should be a pre-investment study for a large rolling programme of future energy provision, concentrating on the place of biomass in the total energy-matrix of Kenya. Accordingly, with the help of some "seed-money" from the Swedish Agency for Research Co-operation with Developing Countries (SAREC), an International Reference Group of energy special ists selected by the Beijer Institute met in Stockholm in January 1980 to discuss the possibilities of mounting such a wide-ranging systems study of Kenya's future energy requirements. A further Group Meeting in March evaluated and adopted a document to be forwarded to the Kenyan Government who approved it. By August 1980 initial funding had been secured by the generosity of the Royal Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the German Appropriate Technology Exchange of the German Agency for Technical Co-operation (GTZ). The project was launched in December, 1980. Both the Swedish International Development Authority (SIDA) and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) subsequently contributed resources to complete the funding needed for the Project. It took almost 3 years of careful preparatory work to develop sensible analytical goal S, to write detailed research programmes and to build constituencies providing official moral and financial support for action both in Kenya and among donor countries. At the time it seemed a painfully slow and frustrating process. But reflecting now upon those years, I think we all expected that the changes in public perception, which were needed to legitimize our approach and allow the Project to be born, would happen much too quickly. The work was comprehensive. Data on commercial supply was careful l y calculated with offici a1 s from the Ministry of Energy and the Central Bureau of Statistics. Commercial demand data was more difficult to obtain but East African Power and Light (EAPL) and the oil companies gave valuable help and allowed access to sales figures. Important demand information was a1 so provided by parastatal corporations and the larger private consumers. It was, however, the problem of obtaining good data on supply and demand in the non-commercial energy sector that concerned the research team. From the beginning of the analysis, the research team were preoccupied with issues of non-commercial energy. Although there were preliminary and conflicting estimates of fuelwood's contribution to the total energy balance of Kenya, it was clear that it was the significant resource. The national demand surveys for rural and urban, households and informal industry, largely conducted with the Central Bureau of Statistics, were a major effort. They allowed an accurate picture to be drawn of end-use consumption patterns across different social classes. This process of data collection and analysis was supported by twelve detailed vill age-level case studies which provided an understanding of fuel procurement and consumption within the household economy for every ecological zone. Much detailed work was undertaken to analyse all aspects of non-commerci a1 supply. The Kenya Range1 and Ecological Monitoring Unit (KREMU) and the Department of Forestry of the University of Nairobi provided strong support in remote sensing, photo interpretation and mensuration exercises. Within the Project, the analysis of non-commercial supply, like the analysis of non-commercial demand, was a departure from the usual perfunctory treatment of traditional fuel S: it a1 lowed a comprehensive analysis of the dominant energy sector in Kenya. It a1 so a1 lowed analysis to be performed on associated problems such as soil erosion. All this work produced a snapshot of Kenya's energy balance for 1980. The problem, however, was to convert this static picture into one moving forward with time. The Central Bureau of Statistics and the Ministry of Economic Development and P1 anni ng provided invaluable help in discussions of demography and growth targets respective1y. The Ministry of Agricul ture gave assistance in outlining the implications of the Government of Kenya's food policy. It was, however, the Ministry of Energy that encouraged the team to build the end-use energy accounting system into a p01icy tool for analysis and planning of programmatic options. This volume contains a synthesis of that analysis, a synthesis that has permitted the development of an energy policy in Kenya. But the impact of the work goes far beyond questions of wood and energy not l east because it focuses development initiative back on the high potential land. Work did not end with the production of the policy analysis. Detailed consideration was given to the costs and benefits of the programmatic options. A series of interventions was proposed, adopted and is currently being implemented. In particular, the work on agroforestry is a significant departure which holds great hope for the future. The importance of agroforestry to integrated energy p1 anning in developing countries cannot be over-emphasised. In retrospect, many of the broad conclusions, which are applicable to other African countries, seem commonplace. These conclusions, however, mark a significant shift from the accepted wisdom of energy planning and suggest: (a) that if terms of trade between developed and developing countries continue to stagnate there will be little capital available to increase the proportion of commercial energy in the national energy budget. Consequently, biomass utilization will increase in absolute terms and, in some cases, re1ative terms; (b) since fuelwood is the most important biomass energy source, increasing pressure will be placed on it by a rising population. Consequently, there will be increased cutting of standing stocks of wood because annual yields are insufficient to support demand; (c) that given the accelerated urban demand for charcoal as a resui t of rapid urbanization, accelerating wood removal will occur as charcoal making often causes the complete destruction.
Recommended publications
  • 3 Agriculture in Kenya: Large- Versus Small-Scale Farming
    3 Agriculture in Kenya: Large- versus Small-Scale Farming Large-scale farming and structural change Before we embark on a chronological account of the changes and developments in Kenya's agriculture it would be helpful to look at the structural changes brought about by the setting up of large­ scale agricultural estates by European settlers. The history of development or lack of development in the rural areas of Kenya has been largely determined by the imposition of this type of farm­ ing on the country. Did the kind of agriculture brought by the settlers lead to development? The following sections will show that after forty difficult years it brought about prosperity within the European-settled areas, but that it was directly responsible for (a) holding back agricultural development in other areas, (b) the poli­ tical explosion in the 1950s, (c) creating the 'peasant capitalist' from the late 1950s and finally (d) the gross underdevelopment in the areas of the nomadic pastoralists. First let us examine the reasons why this large-scale farming was able to succeed. Up to the mid-1950s the settlers' success was un­ doubtedly at the expense of the African farmers. A large proportion of the land and labour force, capital, administration, communi­ cations and marketing were directed by the colonial authorities with a favourable bias towards the settler section of production. The mechanics of this channeling of resources will be discussed in other chapters. Initially and up to the mid-1950s the settler and peasant pro­ ducers were in competition for the above resources. It was essen­ tially a competition between a few large estates and very many small peasant plots to see which could produce the most cheaply.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping of Studies on Employment Creation of Agriculture and Agro-Processing in Kenya
    MAPPING OF STUDIES ON EMPLOYMENT CREATION OF AGRICULTURE AND AGRO-PROCESSING IN KENYA FINAL REPORT By Dr. Matthew Muma July 2016 Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms ...................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... v 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives of the Study ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Organization of the Study ................................................................................................. 3 2. SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Macro-economic Profile .................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Current Initiatives in Employment Creation in Agricultural Value Chains ........................... 7 2.2.1 Agriculture .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 'Green' Trajectory of Economic Growth and Energy Security in Kenya?
    Towards a ‘green’ trajectory of economic growth and energy security in Kenya? Tom Owino Ries Kamphof Ernst Kuneman Xander van Tilburg Research Report Louise van Schaik James Rawlins Towards a ‘green’ trajectory of economic growth and energy security in Kenya? Tom Owino Ries Kamphof Ernst Kuneman Xander van Tilburg With contributions from Louise van Schaik and James Rawlins Research Report December 2016 December 2016 © Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. Cover photo: Farmer shows Feed the Future Kenya AVCD team her solar power in Opapo orange‑flesh sweet potato site visit in Migori county. © Flickr.com, ILRI/Muthoni Njiru Unauthorized use of any materials violates copyright, trademark and / or other laws. Should a user download material from the website or any other source related to the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, or the Clingendael Institute, for personal or non‑commercial use, the user must retain all copyright, trademark or other similar notices contained in the original material or on any copies of this material. Material on the website of the Clingendael Institute may be reproduced or publicly displayed, distributed or used for any public and non‑commercial purposes, but only by mentioning the Clingendael Institute as its source. Permission is required to use the logo of the Clingendael Institute. This can be obtained by contacting the Communication desk of the Clingendael Institute ([email protected]). The following web link activities are prohibited by the Clingendael Institute and may present trademark and copyright infringement issues: links that involve unauthorized use of our logo, framing, inline links, or metatags, as well as hyperlinks or a form of link disguising the URL.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Cape Town
    The Collapse of a Regional Institution: The Story of the East African Railways within the East African Community, 1967-1977 Patrick / Whang / WHNPAT001 A minor dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Arts in Economic History Faculty of the Humanities University of Cape Town 2016 COMPULSORY DECLARATION This work has not beenUniversity previously submitted inof whole, Cape or in part, Townfor the award of any degree. It is my own work. Each significant contribution to, and quotation in, this dissertation from the work, or works, of other people has been attributed, and has been cited and referenced. Signature: Date: 1 The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town Acknowledgements I would first like to begin by thanking my supervisor, Dr. Michelle Sikes, for her patience and guidance in helping me to navigate the process of developing this dissertation and also helping me discover my academic voice. I have learned so much from her in such a short period. In helping me find appropriate primary sources, I have to thank two people. One is Mr. Anniel Njoka who is a staff librarian at the Daily Nation newspaper in Nairobi. His experience with navigating the news archives and also working with researchers made my task much easier in exploiting this wonderful resource.
    [Show full text]
  • WEF Nexus in Kenya, a Dynamic, Lower-Middle-Income ‘Frontier’ Economy That Is of Particular Interest for Several Reasons
    The Water–Energy–Food Nexus in a Climate- Vulnerable, Frontier Economy: The Case of Kenya Report Prepared for the United Kingdom Department for International Development by the Sustainability Institute South Africa Disclaimer The author is grateful to the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (DFID) for funding this research. All views expressed and any errors contained in the paper are the responsibility of the author, and should not be attributed to DFID. The Water–Energy–Food Nexus in a Climate- Vulnerable, Frontier Economy: The Case of Kenya Jeremy J. Wakeford, PhD1 March 2017 Abstract In recent years, the complex set of interdependencies among water, energy and food systems – the WEF nexus – has emerged as a central issue within the overlapping fields of sustainable development and climate change resilience. This paper conducts a case study of the WEF nexus in Kenya, a dynamic, lower-middle-income ‘frontier’ economy that is of particular interest for several reasons. First, the country is acutely vulnerable to climate change and variability, given its geographical location in East Africa and its dependence on largely rain-fed agriculture for nearly one-third of its GDP. Second, Kenya is poised to begin production of oil in 2017, which could have a substantial impact on the country’s ensuing development trajectory. Third, Kenya has been a leader within Africa in developing certain types of renewable energy, notably geothermal power. This paper explores the major global and national drivers affecting the WEF nexus in Kenya, such as a high rate of population expansion, rapid urbanisation and robust economic growth.
    [Show full text]
  • National Energy Situational and Stakeholder Analysis KENYA
    National Energy Situational and Stakeholder Analysis KENYA 100% Renewables Cities and Regions Roadmap Supported by: based on a decision of the German Bundestag National Energy Situational and Stakeholder Analysis: Kenya The material in this publication is copyrighted. Content from this discussion paper may be used for non-commercial purposes, provided it is attributed to the source. ICLEI Africa - Local Government for Sustainability Cape Town, South Africa December 2020 Authors: Dania Petrik, ICLEI Africa Godfrey Maina, consultant Modest Muriuki, consultant Justus Munyoki, SUSTwatch Reviewers (in Alphabetical Order): Mr. N. Bukachi, EPRA Ms. C. Buma, ICLEI Africa Mr. D. Hoepfl, ICLEI World Secretariat Ms. P. Kimotho, REREC Mr. B.K. Kinyanjui, Kenya Power Ms. N. Majoe, ICLEI Africa Mr. J. Munyoki, SUSTwatch Ms. K. Muoki, State Department for Planning Mr. J. Muthomi, consultant Mr. K. Olwasi, Ministry of Environment and Forestry Mr. E. Omwenga, Ministry of Energy Mr. R. Sen, ICLEI World Secretariat i Acknowledgement This report was produced as part of the project 100% of Renewables Cities and Regions Roadmap, (or 100%RE), implemented by ICLEI and funded by the International Climate Initiative (IKI) of the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) of Germany. The contributions of various institutions involved in the consultations for the Kenya National Energy Situational Report are greatly appreciated. We would like to thank all the experts and government officials involved in the feedback process for their insights – without which the value of this project would be much reduced. The authors would especially like to thank our representatives from the 100% RE National Project Advisory Group (NPAG), who have so generously committed time and energy to contribute towards the outputs of the 100% RE project.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya: an African Oil Upstart in Transition
    October 2014 Kenya: An African oil upstart in transition OIES PAPER: WPM 53 Luke Patey Danish Institute for International Studies & Research Associate, OIES The contents of this paper are the authors’ sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2014 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-78467-011-5 October 2014 - Kenya: An African oil upstart in transition i Acknowledgements I would like to thank Adrian Browne, Bassam Fattouh, Celeste Hicks, Martin Marani, and Mikkel Funder for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of the paper. I alone remain responsible for any errors or shortcomings. October 2014 - Kenya: An African oil upstart in transition ii Executive Summary In late March 2012, Kenya entered the East African oil scene with a surprising splash. After decades of unsuccessful on-and-off exploration by international oil companies, Tullow Oil, a UK-based firm, discovered oil in Kenya’s north-west Turkana County. This paper analyses the opportunities and risks facing Kenya’s oil industry and its role as a regional oil transport hub. It provides a snapshot of Kenya’s economic, political, and security environment, offers a comprehensive overview of the development of Kenya’s oil industry and possibilities for regional oil infrastructure cooperation with neighbouring countries in East Africa, and considers the potential political, social, and security risks facing the oil industry and regional infrastructure plans.
    [Show full text]
  • An Employment- Targeted Economic Program for Kenya ______
    An Employment- Targeted Economic Program for Kenya ___________________________________________________ Robert Pollin Mwangi wa Githinji~ ~ James Heintz Department of Economics and Political Economy Research Institute (PERI), University of Massachusetts-Amherst COUNTRY STUDY SUPPORTED BY THE INTERNATIONAL POVERTY CENTRE This is an independent report produced by a team of international and national consultants supported by the International Poverty Centre in Brasilia (IPC). This report is part of a wider global research programme encompassing several other countries. The views in this report are the authors’ and not necessarily IPC’s. However, the IPC regards this report as an important contribution to the debate on economic policies and employment programmes in Kenya as well as in other countries in Africa. Copyright © 2007 POLITICAL ECONOMY RESEARCH INSTITUTE (PERI) Gordon Hall / 418 N. Pleasant St., Suite A Amherst, MA, USA, 01002 http://www.umass.edu/peri An Employment-Targeted Economic Program for Kenya: Brief Highlights of Major Proposals The principal focus of our study is to develop effective policies for greatly ex- panding decent employment opportunities in Kenya. As we use the term, de- cent employment means a work situation that enables people to at least maintain him/herself and his/her family above a reasonable poverty line. The government of Kenya has committed itself to generating 500,000 new jobs per year at least through 2007. We certainly embrace this goal. At the same time, there are wide disparities in the types of employment opportunities avail- able in Kenya. A high proportion of people working full time at jobs are still unable to support themselves and their families above a poverty-line level.
    [Show full text]
  • Choice of Attractions, Expenditure and Satisfaction of International Tourists to Kenya /Pius Odunga Phd-Thesis, Wageningen University
    Choice of Attractions, Expenditure and Satisfaction of International Tourists to Kenya Pius Ongoro Odunga Promotor: prof. dr. H. Folmer Hoogleraar in de Algemene Economie Wageningen Universiteit, Nederland prof. dr. G. Antonides Hoogleraar in de Economie van Consumenten en Huishoudens Wageningen Universiteit, Nederland Co-promotor: prof. dr. W.J.M. Heijman Hoogleraar in de Regionale Economie Wageningen Universiteit, Nederland Promotiecommissie: prof. dr. J. Lengkeek, Wageningen Universiteit dr. J.H.L. Oud, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen prof. dr. A.F. Mkenda, University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania prof. dr. A. Meister, Massey University, Nieuw Zeeland Dit onderzoek is uitgevoerd binnen de onderzoekschool Mansholt Graduate School of Social Sciences Choice of Attractions, Expenditure and Satisfaction of International Tourists to Kenya Pius Ongoro Odunga Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van de rector magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit, Prof.dr.ir. L. Speelman, in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 28 juni 2005 des namiddags te half twee in de Aula ISBN: 90-8504-291-0 Odunga, Pius Choice of Attractions, Expenditure and Satisfaction of International Tourists to Kenya /Pius Odunga PhD-thesis, Wageningen University. – With ref. – With summary in Dutch Acknowledgements I have been supported by many people in my academic life and this has enabled me to come this far. Besides these people, I thank my brains, my thoughts, my hands, and my corporal body for they are always helpful to me. I now have the opportunity to thank some of those people, who have contributed towards this achievement. The research project leading to this thesis was funded by the MHO-TOURISM project (under the auspices of NUFFIC): Strengthening the Teaching and Research Capacity of the Department of Tourism.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Economy Analysis of the Budget Process in Kenya
    Political Economy Analyses of Countries in Eastern and Southern Africa Case Study – Kenya Political Economy Analysis May 2017 Table of contents Abbreviations 5 Executive Summary 9 Introduction 11 1 Politico-economic historical context 13 2 Key actors in advocacy for children 19 3 Structure and actors in the budget process 37 4 Advocacy entry points for resource allocation 51 Conclusion 59 Appendix 1 List of interviewees 61 Appendix 2 List of references 63 3 Abbreviations BAC Budget and Appropriation Committee BPS Budget Policy Statement BROP Budget Review and Outlook Paper CA County Assembly CBEF County Budget and Economic Forum CFSP County Fiscal Strategy Paper CIDP County Integrated Development Plan CORD Coalition for Reforms and Democracy CRA Commission on Revenue Allocation CSO Civil society organisation DP Development Partner EAC East African Community ECDE Early Childhood Development Education ESARO Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Office FSA Fiscal space analysis FY Financial year GDP Gross domestic product IBP International Budget Partnership ICT Information and Communication Technology IEA Institute of Economic Affairs IEBC Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission KADU Kenya African Democratic Union KANU Kenya African National Union KEPSA Kenya Private Sector Alliance KIPPRA Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis Ksh Kenyan Shilling MCA Member of County Assembly MOEST Ministry Of Education, Science and Technology MP Member of Parliament MTP Medium Term Plan MoH Ministry of Health NARC National Alliance
    [Show full text]
  • Youth, Peace and Security in Kenya by Olawale Ismail
    Youth, peace and Security in Kenya by Olawale Ismail Youth, Peace and Security in Kenya Revised Draft 12/12/2017 1 Youth, peace and Security in Kenya by Olawale Ismail 1. Introduction Kenya underscores the spirit and letter of UNSC Resolution 2250 in many ways. Over the last decade, Kenya’s political-security volatility has been well documented by extant research and media reports. Incidence of political and election-related violence, radicalization and violent extremism, inter-ethnic and inter-communal clashes, pastoralist violence, and state-led violence dot Kenya’s peace and security landscape in the last 10 years. While most of these peace and security issues predate the last decade, their scale, spread, intensity and impacts are unprecedented. As in similar contexts, much of research and policy attention have focused mostly on the role of young women and men largely as victims and perpetrators of violence, respectively. However, emerging pointers, as encapsulated in UNSCR 2250, signpost the crucial role and contribution of young people to preventing violence, responding to violence and rebuilding peace, and informed contributions to the security and stability of communities, countries and world at large. Kenya is no different; female and male youth on their own and/or in collaboration with other stakeholders, actively contributes to conflict prevention, reconciliation and peacebuilding in Kenya. Accordingly, this report presents an overview of the contemporary peace and security challenges in Kenya, and the responses of young people in the form of their roles and contributions to peacebuilding efforts. This case-study was commissioned by UNFPA and PBSO for the Progress Study on YPS requested by SCR 2250, with funding support from SIDA.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya: Agricultural Sector
    Public Disclosure Authorized AGRICULTURE GLOBAL PRACTICE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PAPER Public Disclosure Authorized KENYA AGRICULTURAL SECTOR RISK ASSESSMENT Public Disclosure Authorized Stephen P. D’Alessandro, Jorge Caballero, John Lichte, and Simon Simpkin WORLD BANK GROUP REPORT NUMBER 97887 NOVEMBER 2015 Public Disclosure Authorized AGRICULTURE GLOBAL PRACTICE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PAPER KENYA Agricultural Sector Risk Assessment Stephen P. D’Alessandro, Jorge Caballero, John Lichte, and Simon Simpkin Kenya: Agricultural Sector Risk Assessment © 2015 World Bank Group 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org E-mail: [email protected] All rights reserved This volume is a product of the staff of the World Bank Group. The fi ndings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily refl ect the views of the Executive Directors of the World Bank Group or the governments they represent. The World Bank Group does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of the World Bank Group concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. World Bank Group encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clear- ance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone: 978-750-8400, fax: 978-750-4470, http://www.copyright .com/.
    [Show full text]